woooooooooow
i think there is a probleme in vallemo my touchpad beat down tf prime and all tablets and phones using aokp rom
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
can you tell me your scores guys
I'd love to see some vellamo results from someone running that 2.157ghz kernel.
i love the part where its so small you can see nothing to verify the validity
ive also ran some Benchmarks on AOKP rom (plain, just GAPPS intalled)
standard
Quadrant: 2457
Vellamo: 1139
1,2GHZ
Quadrant: 2578
Vellamo: 1133
1,5GHZ
Quadrant: 2486
Vellamo: 1236
1,7GHZ
Quadrant: 2876
Vellamo: 1349
only the transformer prime beat me on 1,7GHZ but i can live with that^^
overall im very happy with the performance, especially when i think of the price i paid for the touchpad and how much the transformer prime costs
Related
Does anyone know a good rom kernal combo to score around 3500+ on quadrant? Preferably ICS?
Derp...what was the deciding factor for needing to post this in the dev section? The Aokp discussion thread would of been a great place for this topic.
I don't always base my ROM choice on synthetic benchmarks but when I do I choose Quadrant.
Just for giggles, I updated Quadrant and ran it. On 35.1, glitched, at 110% OC, mine did 1400.
I think that's the first one I've ran since voodoo was inflating the scores and making our phones look really fast.
htim95 said:
Does anyone know a good rom kernal combo to score around 3500+ on quadrant? Preferably ICS?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good luck
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA
I have a transformer prime and I decided to upgrade to jelly bean using one of the CM10builds. After loading I noticed that the CPU is listed as a ARM processor. I don't remember looking at it before the upgrading. Is this an known issue with the CM10 builds??? Also if this is wrong , it should be. What determines the CPU listing? the Kernel???? any idea how to resolve?
Using the app "system tuner pro" it shows the CPU as arm and only one CPU core is being used. I would ask in the dev group if I had posted more and not lurked in the groups for so long.
I'm not sure what it's supposed to display but the tegra 3 is made up of ARM cortex A9 CPU cores
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
ARM is the most common processor architecture familly in Android devices. It's not a bug.
Didn't find a thread for the device so started a new one. Anyone else with this device?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent fra min Nexus 6P via Tapatalk
The antutu score is from my own device, recieved today
Sent fra min Nexus 6P via Tapatalk
I just bought the 4/32 version. It's a beast. Would love to see some development for it.
I have been researching the newer android tv boxes and the two with the highest benchmark scores and best 4k results are the H96 and Yundoo Y8, both of which feature the Rockchip RK3399 chipset. But there are lots of bad reviews for both when it come to reliability of the hardware. Overheating, freezing and units not working properly out of the box. I was just wondering what you guys experience has been?
I have this box firmware version 20171013. It is realy nice and the antutu score is 81000 wtih this firmware.
Since many ask about benchmarks, I figured "why not start a thread". You're welcome to post your own benchmarks here. Please state rom and kernel version and methodology used
Code:
[B]Methodology:[/B] Cold boot. Recent Apps cleared.
[B]Rom:[/B] crDroid Android v3.3 [June 4]
[B]Kernel:[/B] SmokeR21.5 Beta 3 [28.06.2017]
Performance profile: Gamer
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Performance profile: Usual
Palm Trees said:
Since many ask about benchmarks, I figured "why not start a thread". You're welcome to post your own benchmarks here. Please state rom and kernel version and methodology used
Performance profile:Gamer
Performance profile:Usual
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get 84k on antutu
Hi guys, I just got my s21+ a few days ago and did geekbench and got 500 single core and 2200 multicore, I also tried antutu and got like 550000 points, what do you think the reason is?
Thank you!
Bloatware, apps running in background and/or not optimized.
xXNuafaXx said:
Hi guys, I just got my s21+ a few days ago and did geekbench and got 500 single core and 2200 multicore, I also tried antutu and got like 550000 points, what do you think the reason is?
Thank you!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Power saving mode may be enabled?
Clear system cache too...
S21 exynos, not a bad score
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
My compute score is highest to at 7464, running exynos, performance has been amazing
Just ran it again and got even higher