Related
Hi
After updating to FW 2.1.02 I hoped to get a n-wireless speed connection with my router (other devices connect in n speed without problem) as the changelog of the fw 2.1.02 says that n-wireless is now enabled.
But I still have a 54 Mbit speed mentionned in the connection details.
I have a dualband router. Both freqs are configured to have 300 Mbit.
The A70 doesn't see the 5 MHz network (because I think it has a 2.4 GHz chip inside).
Other devices connect to my router with n-speed on the 2.4 GHz net.
How about you? Any success after fw upgrade or still 54 Mbit connection?
Any solution for that "problem"?
(I want n-connection, when the A70 says it has a n-chip inside...)
I have the same issue !!!! i'm using a sagem fast 3304 >>300mbps
Archos when will we have wifi-N SUPPORT !!!!! And Flash support ....... ¿
Not working for me either with wireless n.
I'm only seeing 54mbit so far.
Same here.
This is the answer from a member of the R&D team of Archos:
courville said:
wifi chipset supports single stream thus caps at 65MBps raw PHY rate. It has also all aggregation features of the IEEE802.11n standards that enable to save the silent periods over the air and increase throughput efficiency.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
kitsune44fr said:
This is the answer from a member of the R&D team of Archos:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And thats exactly what my wireless router shows me as connection speed for the archos: 65 mb/s. So it's definitely a n-connection but limited to 65 MB. So there will probably never be a faster speed with that device, as the Archos guy points out that it's a hardware limtation of the chip .
One more proof that it's an error to always see 811n as synonymous to 300 MB/s.
My phone is running on CM7 Beta 3 and I want to overclock it to 1.5 Ghz I followed the inscructions here http://bugbig.com/how-to-overclock-motorola-atrix-4g-to-1-5-ghz
and when I typed on the emulator : ''insmod olympus_overclock.ko'' it was written : insmod: init_module 'olympus_overclock.ko' failed (exec format error)
I'm running on Faux's kernel (faux123) so what can I do to overclock my phone to 1.5 Ghz ?
Thank you in advance
Why 1.5? What's magic about that number? Doubt we will ever see 1.5 on Atrix. Dual core already gets hot enough at 1.1 and there is no cooling available. Different to a single core OC.
Assimilated via WinBorg 4G
that guide is extremely outdated. the kernel module you're trying to use was released before the bootloader was unlocked, and as far as i've read from Faux123 there is something limiting our ability to overclock that we just haven't broken through yet.
belig1234 said:
My phone is running on CM7 Beta 3 and I want to overclock it to 1.5 Ghz I followed the inscructions here http://bugbig.com/how-to-overclock-motorola-atrix-4g-to-1-5-ghz
and when I typed on the emulator : ''insmod olympus_overclock.ko'' it was written : insmod: init_module 'olympus_overclock.ko' failed (exec format error)
I'm running on Faux's kernel (faux123) so what can I do to overclock my phone to 1.5 Ghz ?
Thank you in advance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A few things to consider.
May be the kernel you are using is not meant to work with CM7 Beta.
May be you are following the steps but the guide itself is broken.
May be you are trying to OC your phone to 1.5 GHz but the script is broken.
You said you are running Faux's kernel, well that kernel is only taking your phone to 1.1 GHz, how and why do you expect your phone to magically OC itself to 1.5?
Just 2 cents : I agree with CaelanT, this phone is a Monster itself. When you OC your phone to 1.1, it just bloody flies... Whats the need to OC it all the way to 1.5? Also, while OC'd, it heats up like a *****... I have seen my phone temperature reaching > 45 degrees... Man, it feels like a burning charcoal... I am just wondering if one will actually end up blowing up his/her phone just cuz of OC'd phone.
I actually keep mine underclocked...
Cheers!!!
creativedevil said:
A few things to consider.
May be the kernel you are using is not meant to work with CM7 Beta.
May be you are following the steps but the guide itself is broken.
May be you are trying to OC your phone to 1.5 GHz but the script is broken.
You said you are running Faux's kernel, well that kernel is only taking your phone to 1.1 GHz, how and why do you expect your phone to magically OC itself to 1.5?
Just 2 cents : I agree with CaelanT, this phone is a Monster itself. When you OC your phone to 1.1, it just bloody flies... Whats the need to OC it all the way to 1.5? Also, while OC'd, it heats up like a *****... I have seen my phone temperature reaching > 45 degrees... Man, it feels like a burning charcoal... I am just wondering if one will actually end up blowing up his/her phone just cuz of OC'd phone.
I actually keep mine underclocked...
Cheers!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+10
/10 chars
Hi,
If there is a limit on clock frequencies, in my experience that implies a multiplier register needs to be changed. But a 50% overclock is rather ambitious, 10% is probably the safest range.
Cheers!
NFHimself said:
Hi,
If there is a limit on clock frequencies, in my experience that implies a multiplier register needs to be changed. But a 50% overclock is rather ambitious, 10% is probably the safest range.
Cheers!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Excessively overclocking mobile devices - is an incredibly stupid idea,... unless you have no problem getting a hardbrick one day.
Try overclocking your desktop PC up to 50% without additional cooling and let us know how it goes. Phones have NO cooling, they weren't meant to be overclocked that much.
Besides our current Tegra 2 setup has enough performance for everything available on Android at this moment.
If anything is lagging for you, that's because:
1. Motorola released crappy laggy motoblur
2. some app developer released crappy laggy app
Why does overclocking always turn into a penis measuring contest?
Focus on software optimisation, not on more raw performance to make up for crappy code.
ok thank you everyone I'll stick with kernel faux123
xploited said:
Excessively overclocking mobile devices - is an incredibly stupid idea,... unless you have no problem getting a hardbrick one day.
Try overclocking your desktop PC up to 50% without additional cooling and let us know how it goes. Phones have NO cooling, they weren't meant to be overclocked that much.
Besides our current Tegra 2 setup has enough performance for everything available on Android at this moment.
If anything is lagging for you, that's because:
1. Motorola released crappy laggy motoblur
2. some app developer released crappy laggy app
Why does overclocking always turn into a penis measuring contest?
Focus on software optimisation, not on more raw performance to make up for crappy code.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
The internet has heard your complaint and will adjust itself accordingly. Lol
Cheers!
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Faux just tweeted ATRIX can be overclocked to 1.3 http://rootzwiki.com/showthread.php?t=1873
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
I just overclocked my sgs 2 to 1.6ghz so I'm sure the Atrix will get there soon.
Sent from my Xoom using xda premium
I would like to see 1.5ghz too. hopefully our chipset can handle that
When I look in system info in quadrant after running full bench it only shows 1 core but when I reboot or end application and relaunch it recognizes both cores.
belig1234 said:
My phone is running on CM7 Beta 3 and I want to overclock it to 1.5 Ghz I followed the inscructions here http://bugbig.com/how-to-overclock-motorola-atrix-4g-to-1-5-ghz
and when I typed on the emulator : ''insmod olympus_overclock.ko'' it was written : insmod: init_module 'olympus_overclock.ko' failed (exec format error)
I'm running on Faux's kernel (faux123) so what can I do to overclock my phone to 1.5 Ghz ?
Thank you in advance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That module doesnt work, please check 0.1.8 from faux, everybody is having bootloops, but im loving to have 1.3ghz OC ^^
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
ChongoDroid said:
I just overclocked my sgs 2 to 1.6ghz so I'm sure the Atrix will get there soon.
Sent from my Xoom using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SGS2 starts out with dual core 1.2GHz, so technically you haven't reached a .5GHz OC there. Even if you did, comparing the SGS2 to the Atrix is apples to oranges.
The problem with the Atrix is not only whether the hardware will OC to 1.5GHz. Heat is the biggest problem, and with very high temps on a 1.1GHz OC under load I doubt as I mentioned before we will ever reach 1.5GHz.
I don't know what temps the SGS2 processor gets to, so I can't comment on that.
1.1/1.2 GHz is quite fast enough for me, and as someone else said, it just turns into an epeen war, with no actual rhyme or reason for wanting to OC so high other than to see if it is possible, which is all good and well.
I can OC my PC way higher than it currently is, but I choose a conservative approach because I do not want to fry any components, have graphical artifacts, etc. Same goes for my phone. I want stability and to not have to wave it around in the air to manually actively cool it!
CaelanT said:
SGS2 starts out with dual core 1.2GHz, so technically you haven't reached a .5GHz OC there. Even if you did, comparing the SGS2 to the Atrix is apples to oranges.
The problem with the Atrix is not only whether the hardware will OC to 1.5GHz. Heat is the biggest problem, and with very high temps on a 1.1GHz OC under load I doubt as I mentioned before we will ever reach 1.5GHz.
I don't know what temps the SGS2 processor gets to, so I can't comment on that.
1.1/1.2 GHz is quite fast enough for me, and as someone else said, it just turns into an epeen war, with no actual rhyme or reason for wanting to OC so high other than to see if it is possible, which is all good and well.
I can OC my PC way higher than it currently is, but I choose a conservative approach because I do not want to fry any components, have graphical artifacts, etc. Same goes for my phone. I want stability and to not have to wave it around in the air to manually actively cool it!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hahahaha well said! but how is comparing the 2 apples to oranges??? aren't they almost identical
I have used the cpu5.sh script to overclock the prime to 1.6Ghz, and benchmark shows a good improvement. I started streaming a 720P movie, mkv format, and everything played perfect but after only 5minutes the whole aluminum frame started to heat up noticeably . So I suggest waiting for some tested overclocked rom's before overclocking to be sure you don't blow it up.
You cant say it is the CPU tweak.
1.5 & 1.6 are built into this CPU. So, technically, your not "over clocking" as your not taking this chip beyond it's design spec. It is a 1.6 capable chip.
Moto did the same thing in the first Droid. They sent the phone out "under clocked" and then later did an update and gave users a claimed speed boost, but all they did was ope up the chip to it's full capable speed & sold it as a speed improvement. That is all that has been done here, we just beat Asus to it.
Lock-N-Load said:
You cant say it is the CPU tweak.
1.5 & 1.6 are built into this CPU. So, technically, your not "over clocking" as your not taking this chip beyond it's design spec. It is a 1.6 capable chip.
Moto did the same thing in the first Droid. They sent the phone out "under clocked" and then later did an update and gave users a claimed speed boost, but all they did was ope up the chip to it's full capable speed & sold it as a speed improvement. That is all that has been done here, we just beat Asus to it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're looking at it way to simple. The fact that the tegra3 chip is capable of running at higher speed, does not mean that in the Prime it is designed to do so.
Not saying you can't run at those speeds, but at extreme conditions (warm weather) , it could be a problem.
Yeah, I don't buy into that the "Prime is not designed to" argument nor that it is the proven issue here for what I said and given the CPU tweak he is talking about does not ramp all cores so I can't see an issue that would cause one to fret... but we can agree to disagree.
What the OP should have done was use CPU Spy and look and see for how long and IF he was even using 1.5 or 1.6 speeds.
Hey - I do think we need to be careful using these tweaks and things should be watched, but give the chip is 1.6 capable, I fully believe the Prime and the cpu's can take it just fine. And either way, this is not "over clocking" technically speaking.
I would imagine (could be wrong) that this chip has overheat and quite possibly overvolt protection. Almost every chip in the last 6-8 years has had this. I remeber turning my athlon x2 on with no heatsink and it actually stayed on for about 10 minutes before turning off. Even at 1.3-1.4 it can overheat. Infact the small overclock will be minimal on heat gain until additional voltage is applied. I would be suprised.if this overclock heated this chip up more than 5 c vs stock.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk
benefit14snake said:
I would imagine (could be wrong) that this chip has overheat and quite possibly overvolt protection. Almost every chip in the last 6-8 years has had this. I remeber turning my athlon x2 on with no heatsink and it actually stayed on for about 10 minutes before turning off. Even at 1.3-1.4 it can overheat. Infact the small overclock will be minimal on heat gain until additional voltage is applied. I would be suprised.if this overclock heated this chip up more than 5 c vs stock.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
IT DOES. Viperboy already confirmed this while looking around in the kernel or whatever. He posted that response in his thread in developement section. IT HAS a failsafe mechanism. I would love to know more details about it though.
PLUS what op said could be said about stock also. THE PRIME BACKPLATE GETS hot in regular performance mode. PLUS I've ran the "Real True" Overclocking. That's the combination of viperboy control mod n system tuner where all 4 cores are maxed out to 1.6Ghz. VIPERBOY control mod alone doesn't do that. PRIME runs fine n does get hot sometimes. It depends on what you doing. PLUS its always good to have a battery temperature widget so you always see the temp. IF CPU is working like crazy. You will see the battery temp go up alot. PRIME was actually designed with 1.6ghz in mind. THats why its part of the kernel. ALL ASUS did was disable it for battery longevity purposes.
Regarding the 1.6Ghz and cpuspy I had just reset the timer before I started streaming and afterwords it showed it had used 99% of the time at 1.6Ghz
Sendt from my Transformer Prime TF201 with Tapatalk
Guys, look up "speed binning". Not every CPU is capable of max speed.
tinky1 said:
Guys, look up "speed binning". Not every CPU is capable of max speed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.pcpitstop.com/news/maxpc/overclock.asp
I read it. Long story short, Tegra3 can easily handle it. Its all about money. WHY would Asus/Nvidia release its first quad core device already maxed out? They want people to be more hyped up down the road when they easily enable the 1.6ghz on future devices, which will have the exact same tegra3 chip in them. Prime was their testing device for future speed increases down the road on future devices. Another reason theybdidnt enable it was because tl promote battery longevity. IF IT wasn't possible or supported or tested already, it wouldn't be in the kernel for us to easily enable it with root access.
If speed binning was an issue most people would need additional voltage to get to 1.6ghz. While this may be the case i in my experiences (HUGE PC overclocker) dont believe this to be the case. I have personally achieved a 1.8 to 3.4ghz overclock on -25c temps. So i have a bit of experience.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk
I posted this in another thread, but the Lenovo tablet running the Tegra 3, shown at CES, is being advertised as running at 1.6ghz.
No worries about running at that speed. Once the bootloader is opened up, I'd feel perfectly fine running at 2.0ghz myself.
Sent from my cellular telephone using magic
Are there any hacks, settings, or drivers that can be adjusted in either the os, or bt stack, or wifi drivers to help reduce the repeating key/mouse stutter that seems to be common in KitKat when on wifi simultaneously? Keyboard pro is a help but it is still very hard to use the bt peripherals effectively whilenthey are jumping all around the screen......
I have heard this is only an issue on 2.4 GHz networks, is that true?
The wifi and Bluetooth are on the same chip. They don't like to run at the same time! It's a hardware issue, not software that no manufacturer seems to care about. Every Android device I have used has issues when using both at the same time. For example, Bluetooth headphones for watching youtube videos means the wifi cuts out every few minutes. A possible solution would be a cheap usb Bluetooth dongle via USB otg.
Use 5 GHz Wifi, then the problem should be solved.
hasenbein1966 said:
Use 5 GHz Wifi, then the problem should be solved.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My gateway router only offers 2.4ghz. Do most home network devices, ie: Tv, blueray, printers, all support 5 GHz or is that only on new or special devices?
A router which has 5 Ghz WiFi always also has 2.4 Ghz because indeed only some devices support 5 Ghz, so a router with only 5 Ghz would be very limited in usage.
Hi there
I'm trying to achieve the best bandwidth over wifi which i need for local file transfer, but strangely enough my Redmi note 4x (Mido) can't get any higher than 150 Mbps link speed over wifi.
My router Asus rt-ac3100 can handle way more than that.
Looking at SD625 specs reveal that the SOC can peak up to 364Mbps.
I used a bunch of 7.1 and 8.1 ROMs but they all have the same results
So i'm wondering what is the limiting factor, and if there is anything to bypass it
The phone's WiFi chipset only supports N bands. It's a/b/g/n only. Though you'd think it'd connect a bit higher, since N allows for 600Mbps. My laptop is stuck with an Intel a/b/g/n card and I get a link speed of 240 to 270Mbps when connected via 5 Ghz.
How far away is your router? My router is in my room, where I am right now with all my devices. Though the link speed on my Note 4 is still capped to 150Mbps. Strange. Don't know if it's a fixed hardware limit or something else. I previously checked on MIUI and now on LOS 15.1. Both show the same 150Mbps link speed.
My LeEco x722 (SD820, 802.11ac WiFi) got 866Mbps easily. I also had another Snapdragon 625 phone, but with AC WiFi. It too got a pretty high link speed of around 600Mbps. I think the issue is that the wireless chipset in the Note 4 is very poor.
sk8223 said:
The phone's WiFi chipset only supports N bands. It's a/b/g/n only. Though you'd think it'd connect a bit higher, since N allows for 600Mbps. My laptop is stuck with an Intel a/b/g/n card and I get a link speed of 240 to 270Mbps when connected via 5 Ghz.
How far away is your router? My router is in my room, where I am right now with all my devices. Though the link speed on my Note 4 is still capped to 150Mbps. Strange. Don't know if it's a fixed hardware limit or something else. I previously checked on MIUI and now on LOS 15.1. Both show the same 150Mbps link speed.
My LeEco x722 (SD820, 802.11ac WiFi) got 866Mbps easily. I also had another Snapdragon 625 phone, but with AC WiFi. It too got a pretty high link speed of around 600Mbps. I think the issue is that the wireless chipset in the Note 4 is very poor.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The router is in the same room as i am with no obstacles between.
I found (at gsmarena.com) that Mido only support up to wifi N (no AC) even though the SoC support AC standard, probably due to the implantation of cheap radio hardware, and because most phones optimized for efficiency it run only on a single radio band that is why 150Mbit and not the 300/600mb advertised even for wifi N standard.
The news left me disappointed, for a top midrange phone not to support AC, i guess something to consider in my next phone
The twin brother of mido the Mi A1 which is literally a Redmi note 4x play edition support AC wifi. Moreover the Mediatec version (nickel) also support AC wifi, so why xiaomi left the redmi note 4x without?
The more i dive the more i feel betrayal.
kmaljane said:
The twin brother of mido the Mi A1 which is literally a Redmi note 4x play edition support AC wifi. M1qoreover the Mediatec version (nickel) also support AC wifi, so why xiaomi left the redmi note 4x without?
The more i dive the more i feel betrayal.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe it is a driver from the firmware and/or kernel that doesn't allow full speed N or AC to work. I have looked into most of the software and cannot find what is stopping it.
Try wired connection by buying usb adapter maybe? Have you tried flashing latest dev firmware along with rom that might help.
RapGodS said:
Try wired connection by buying usb adapter maybe? Have you tried flashing latest dev firmware along with rom that might help.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wired connection is not an option for a phone. I tried both stable and dev firmware with a bunch of roms and it is always the same 150 Mbit link.
Gsmarena listed the phone as Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n enabled device. So it it official, no AC for mido