Hello everyone.
I am running Pure ICS 7.2 Rom and like it very much.
Now i'm in need of finding the most suitable kernel that does not differ alot from stock kernel.
It does not need alot of functionality.
I just want it to be very stable, fast and light..
So no need for 100 of features im not going to need anyways.
The only feature I currently need is the BLN mod.
All the kernels support this, but in the mean time they support 100 of other things, which leads me to the conclusion, the kernel becomes bloated.
Can someone recommend me the most lightweight/fast/stable kernel.
May i remind you, I dont need overclock,underclock,governors,scheudlers etc etc.. I just want to leave it as is!!!!
NEAK kernel says
"The lightest kernel for I9100 ever made!!"
But I find that hard to believe if one looks at the feature list.. It is HUGE!!!!
Thanks in advance
Try neak,its fast and light.im currently using it
Sent from my GT-I9100
neak is good but give a try to siyah too all depends the way u use it an ull get ur results as which kernel is good for u.no one will tell tht a perticular kernel is the no 1...we all experiment an thts the way it is......cheeerz
Tried a few liking Neat Rom stock and rooted and if you want the ICS look just add ICS Domination 4.1
mobileguynz said:
Tried a few liking Neat Rom stock and rooted and if you want the ICS look just add ICS Domination 4.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
please read before posting - or try understand the difference between a kernel and rom...
@op the only way to find out is test them yourself - recommended with BLN, would be neak or siyah obviously
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
Please guys be more precise and read the first post again!!!
I know I can just try different kernels as the first few posts suggest.
But c'mon guys why reinvent the wheel with kernels as well?
I know its a good idea to try different ROMS, and I give the same advice to others, and I have already tried my share of ROMS.
But its just plain stupid doing the same with kernels as well.
In the siyah forum post, some people complain about random restarts etc. The kernel motto is "One kernel to rule them all"..
I DONT NEED SO POWERFULL KERNEL!
I dont need 100 features, 100 governors, support for CM9 and all its functionality etc. etc.. I just want to install and go.
Dont want to play around with scheudlers, governors, OC/UC etc. etc..
You guys catch my drift?
I have very specific demands which I stated in the first post.
I didn't just ask "Which kernel should I use..."
Therefore please only post something, if you have something usefull to say. Not just try NEAK kernel! And why exactly should i try NEAK kernel?
In that forum, people complain about lagging issues etc..
I DONT NEED THAT!
I need a kernel I can flash and forget! Dont want to visit XDA every 2 days to check for updates to the kernel!
Exactly like stock kernels and ROMS. They are only updated maybe once every 6 months or so, because they are stable, and dont crash too often!
I need to have the same experience with the kernel!
well mate, to be honest with ya ICS kernels still obviously aren't 100% stable as sources have only been released for a short period... it obviously sounds like you want a stock Kernel or a kernel similar to SpeedMod, but guess what? they don't have BLN which you stated you wanted. Both Neak and siyah do, and are decent choices, some people prefer one over the other, there is no one better choice, definitely at this current stage in ICS development - so choose one this is why people are saying test one and see for yourself; otherwise move back to gb if you really need BLN and complete stability.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
Thanks man for your honest post
Coming from HTC Desire, I was kind of shocked Samsung omitted the notification led ( why o'why would they do that )
And off course all the reviews of SGS2 were praising the phone so much, they didn't state the obvious con of not including this led
Why don't you stay with the cf root kernel until the other kernels get a stable version?
mcmanuf said:
Thanks man for your honest post
Coming from HTC Desire, I was kind of shocked Samsung omitted the notification led ( why o'why would they do that )
And off course all the reviews of SGS2 were praising the phone so much, they didn't state the obvious con of not including this led
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know what you mean! I had a galaxy s2, however was stolen and found a HTC Desire cheap, so used that for a while, loved the led notification light! However couldn't overlook the fact of the speed of the galaxy s2 and finding one cheap shortly after (thanks ebay!), I reverted back to the s2; one thing its missing is the led, for sure! Though while we do have BLN, it does affect the battery life so isn't really ideal. Though back on topic, if we wait a month I believe we will have stable, fast kernels (whilst also having BLN of course ) , which will shred gb and the custom kernels we had for that.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
Related
I've been browsing the development threads for weeks now and the more I read the more confused I get regarding which Kernel to use on my GS2 (XXKG2). I guess like everybody I'd like the best combination between maximum speed, battery durability and safety.
At the moment I'm using stock with CPU Master.
Any thoughts?
Hm, tough thing to answer.
Chainfire root- The simplest one out there. Keeps the kernel close to Stock.
Ninphetamine- Supports BLN, Overclocking, Voltage Tweaks etc.
There are few others too, but as I haven't tried them won't comment. Any kernel can be used with Stock firmware. Can't say about Custom firmwares as I am not interested.
Regards.
[KERNEL] SpeedMod SGS2 [K1-T27 CWM4 CIFS ROOT]
Forget about Ninphetamine unless you want to overclock.
neophyte's mirage kernel is also good for batt life. it has finer tweak settings for voltages as compared to other kernels.
I've tried them all ninpo kernel and speedmod are two of the best. Currently using the tweaked speedmod by rage which allows undervolting. Ninpo kernel gives excellent standby idle rate.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
I like speedmod because i dont bother about BLN or overclocking. (1.2 GHz not good enough for you? ) And i find the governer to be more aggressive and stable on speedmod. It spends more time on the lower frequencies too, saving more battery.
I'm trying the speedmod kernel but even though the benchmark is higher it doesn't seem as fast as the original XXKG2. For instance, I'm using "Photo Wall live wallpaper" and whenever I wake up the phone it takes like a second to refresh and load the photos...this didn't happen with XXKG2 (it was instantaneous).
What is a faster but still stable kernel alternative?
You could ask a 100 people and get 100 different answers.
The kernel that is best for you is the one you try and like the best. Just because one person likes a kernel doesn't mean you will as you've already found out.
Man up, do some downloading and find out for yourself.
Bynar010 said:
You could ask a 100 people and get 100 different answers.
The kernel that is best for you is the one you try and like the best. Just because one person likes a kernel doesn't mean you will as you've already found out.
Man up, do some downloading and find out for yourself.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How helpful. I think you might just have been Ghandi in a different life.
There is a reason why I've posted this in the Q&A instead of in the development section where I would probably get an answer like yours.
I don't take chances with a 600us$ phone and won't be installing all available kernels when I can get advice here first (the reason forums like this actually exists and the reason why I love them...well, most of the time).
Photos live wallpaper etc would be more of a rom thing, than a kernel thing.
As far as best or what have you kernel, there is no best, i find ninphetamine to be good, you may not, and this might just end up turning into another thread of generic repetition and general uselessness.
The best way is to try them, as the person above said.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
I am using KG6 with ninpheghamine 2.1.3 and quick and giving me almost two days of battery life but again maybe other kernels out there are better. You can try other ones and compare.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
rawfa said:
How helpful. I think you might just have been Ghandi in a different life.
There is a reason why I've posted this in the Q&A instead of in the development section where I would probably get an answer like yours.
I don't take chances with a 600us$ phone and won't be installing all available kernels when I can get advice here first (the reason forums like this actually exists and the reason why I love them...well, most of the time).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Christ on a bike. You do understand what you are getting into when you start dicking around with your phone and custom kernels don't you? You don't take chances with a 600 dollar phone - I'm afraid you are doing, everytime you install any custom rom or custom kernel. However there is no more risk in installing one custom kernel than another custom kernel (when they are out of beta anyway), but what people prefer is massively subjective! Theres no such thing as "the most balanced kernel" because people have differing views on which kernel offers this for them.
If your not sure about a kernel why not read the thread for that kernel and see what feedback its got. If you open a thread like this you'll get a ton of differing answers as you've seen already and its not going to keep you happy.
Sorry if you don't find my advice helpful, but I've managed to find the ROM I like and the kernel I like by TRYING them. Neither of which have been mentioned in this thread by the way, but I'm not going to say its best for you, because you likely use your phone for different scenarios than me.
If your going to step into the brave world of custom kernels, rooting, roms, themes, mods etc the best thing you can do - and I say this genuinely, and meaning to be helpful - is to read up on said things and try the ones you like the sound of and you trust to be safe.
veyka said:
Photos live wallpaper etc would be more of a rom thing, than a kernel thing.
As far as best or what have you kernel, there is no best, i find ninphetamine to be good, you may not, and this might just end up turning into another thread of generic repetition and general uselessness.
The best way is to try them, as the person above said.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. I've been reading good things about ninphetamine. I will give it a try.
veyka said:
Photos live wallpaper etc would be more of a rom thing, than a kernel thing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Couldn't this be GPU related? Do you think apps like Chainfire3D or Overclocking free (GPU/CPU) would fix it?
Hi Galaxy SII users! For the first N.E.A.R. ROM (New Era Android Rom), what type of rom would you like to see? A Gingerbread based rom again but with the N.E.A.K. kernel integrated and specially modified for it or a new ICS based rom but for the moment without N.E.A.K. (because has not yet been released kernel source)? Vote all!!!!
I have already voted for ICS XD
I voted GB as ICS is not yet mature. And I need a stable ROM I can depend on for personal use and also for work.
Let ICS wait until Samsung delivers us a full grown version and then use that as base for a new ROM.
GB without NEAK .
jje
lucabaldo3 said:
Hi Galaxy SII users! For the first N.E.A.R. ROM (New Era Android Rom), what type of rom would you like to see? A Gingerbread based rom again but with the N.E.A.K. kernel integrated and specially modified for it or a new ICS based rom but for the moment without N.E.A.K. (because has not yet been released kernel source)? Vote all!!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is one big ass signature OOps my bad pc playing games on me...GB without the NEAK though
Stifler69 said:
That is one big ass signature OOps my bad pc playing games on me...GB without the NEAK though
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ahahh! XD Now I have scaled it
JJEgan said:
GB without NEAK .
jje
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sorry but simone and I are in the same TEAM and so it would make no sense not to cooperate you'll see that the coupled N.E.A.K. + N.E.A.R. will bring good results
Forget GB...ICS is the way.
JJEgan said:
GB without NEAK .
jje
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stifler69 said:
That is one big ass signature OOps my bad pc playing games on me...GB without the NEAK though
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If we release a rom, it will be WITH NEAK Kernel....
So please, if you don't like it, just go for another rom, maybe u don't know that customizing a rom is pretty much simple, anyone can do that and it's mainly do a stupid theme (very easy), mod 2-3 apps (or better copy from others), and add a few scripts that no one knows what are they doing...
I've developed ROMs for the GS1, and all i can say is that a rom is ONLY made by a kernel for performances, smoothness and battery life
All the rest is graphical, that's why the NEAR Project is meant to give NEAK users a really good and almost perfect user interface and experience to enjoy their phones as much as possible with the smoothness of NEAK Kernel
Don't like my opinion? Just go away and search for another usual "ROM", probably kanged from other good devs
simone201 said:
If we release a rom, it will be WITH NEAK Kernel....
So please, if you don't like it, just go for another rom, maybe u don't know that customizing a rom is pretty much simple, anyone can do that and it's mainly do a stupid theme (very easy), mod 2-3 apps (or better copy from others), and add a few scripts that no one knows what are they doing...
Its headed a POLL what type of rom would you like to see . I answered so now you are saying you dont want replies ???? Or only want replies you like .
All the rest is graphical, that's why the NEAR Project is meant to give NEAK users a really good and almost perfect user interface and experience to enjoy their phones as much as possible with the smoothness of NEAK Kernel
Same old same old hard kernel sell XX kernel is best YY kernel is better .
Have i used NEAK yes do i use it now NO .
jje
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GB all the way for me for NEARv1 without a shadow of doubt.
Only when ICS sources are released, and is stable, look into the possibility of an ICS NEARv2 with ICS NEAK
(I know, I don't want much!)
JJEgan said:
simone201 said:
If we release a rom, it will be WITH NEAK Kernel....
So please, if you don't like it, just go for another rom, maybe u don't know that customizing a rom is pretty much simple, anyone can do that and it's mainly do a stupid theme (very easy), mod 2-3 apps (or better copy from others), and add a few scripts that no one knows what are they doing...
Its headed a POLL what type of rom would you like to see . I answered so now you are saying you dont want replies ???? Or only want replies you like .
All the rest is graphical, that's why the NEAR Project is meant to give NEAK users a really good and almost perfect user interface and experience to enjoy their phones as much as possible with the smoothness of NEAK Kernel
Same old same old hard kernel sell XX kernel is best YY kernel is better .
Have i used NEAK yes do i use it now NO .
jje
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You didn't understand my right....
The poll is about what kind of NEAR Rom do u want to see...there are 2 options, u said a third one that it will be surely not used....that's all
We gave u 2 options, if u don't want one of them, just don't post here saying that NEAK is bad etc...
Also, as i read, u know almost nothing on how are kernels made, and i'm thinking u see a ROM as a Kernel, when they are completely different in way of development and skills needed
Just my 2 cents
PS: and please don't say that a rom is better than another when only the theme is different
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
simone201 said:
PS: and please don't say that a rom is better than another when only the theme is different
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But N.E.A.R. will be something more than a simple teme
lucabaldo3 said:
But N.E.A.R. will be something more than a simple teme
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah sure!
That's why we work toghether!!
I want Simply Honey...best rom i used on my galaxy s
I vote for gb for now cause ics at this moment has to many bugs so alot of people will complain..but when there is a stable ics version then no doubt ics ( had the galaxy nexus for 2 months and ics..when stable..is great )
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
GB N.E.A.R. all the way at the moment.
Until a stable and usable version of ICS comes out, then it must be GB.
There's already too many half arsed attempts at ICS ROM's out there already. I want something that is 100% stable and usable.
D_Magic said:
I want Simply Honey...best rom i used on my galaxy s
I vote for gb for now cause ics at this moment has to many bugs so alot of people will complain..but when there is a stable ics version then no doubt ics ( had the galaxy nexus for 2 months and ics..when stable..is great )
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hahaha thanks mate!
Unfortunately, this is my new project, with lucabaldo3, but it will be as good as SH was on the I9000!
simone201 said:
Hahaha thanks mate!
Unfortunately, this is my new project, with lucabaldo3, but it will be as good as SH was on the I9000!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol i'm 100% sure it will be as good as SH, i knew you coulnd't resist making a rom for the sgs2.
Maybe ics is the way to go now although there isn't a real good base to work with, you can get familiar with ics and try things out...and ics looks more like Simply Honey then gb
Whatever you guys gonna do you know ill test things out for you
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
We gave u 2 options, if u don't want one of them, just don't post here saying that NEAK is bad etc...
One i did not say NEAK was bad i gave an answer on my first post GB No NEAK no more . OK i misunderstood the rather ambiguous original post .
Also, as i read, u know almost nothing on how are kernels made, and i'm thinking u see a ROM as a Kernel, when they are completely different in way of development and skills needed
Just my 2 cents
and please don't say that a rom is better than another when only the theme is different
Thats one good reason for me to disregard anything you say as being valid .
Why well you seem to be able to twist words and put a totally different context in to the reply .
You say i have no idea how kernels are made nothing in my posts on this thread give any indication as to that .
You keep banging on about custom roms and me thinking a kernel is a rom nonsense .
You jump in again with a lack of knowledge and say
and please don't say that a rom is better than another when only the theme is different
Where the f^^^ have i said that .
Fact i have a self customized rom not from XDA .
Fact that rom has had a number of kernels installed over a number of weeks kernels not themes .
Fact kernel of choice is not based upon builders hype and lets face it they are all hyped as the best yet . its actually based upon two factors one my usage and two an independent test .
Fact is my original reply was a mistake as i read the OP wrong or misunderstood its context .
Fact you then jump down my throat in a number of posts accusing me of not knowing what a kernel is and thinking like some ignorant noob saying one kernel is better cause it has a better theme .
Now my regard for Devs and the work they do is very high even for the ones where i don't use their stuff . it would have been for you also before you started slagging me off with your unfounded comments .
I have no intention of prolonging your stupid replies by posting in this thread again .
jje
JJEgan said:
We gave u 2 options, if u don't want one of them, just don't post here saying that NEAK is bad etc...
One i did not say NEAK was bad i gave an answer on my first post GB No NEAK no more . OK i misunderstood the rather ambiguous original post .
Also, as i read, u know almost nothing on how are kernels made, and i'm thinking u see a ROM as a Kernel, when they are completely different in way of development and skills needed
Just my 2 cents
and please don't say that a rom is better than another when only the theme is different
Thats one good reason for me to disregard anything you say as being valid .
Why well you seem to be able to twist words and put a totally different context in to the reply .
You say i have no idea how kernels are made nothing in my posts on this thread give any indication as to that .
You keep banging on about custom roms and me thinking a kernel is a rom nonsense .
You jump in again with a lack of knowledge and say
and please don't say that a rom is better than another when only the theme is different
Where the f^^^ have i said that .
Fact i have a self customized rom not from XDA .
Fact that rom has had a number of kernels installed over a number of weeks kernels not themes .
Fact kernel of choice is not based upon builders hype and lets face it they are all hyped as the best yet . its actually based upon two factors one my usage and two an independent test .
Fact is my original reply was a mistake as i read the OP wrong or misunderstood its context .
Fact you then jump down my throat in a number of posts accusing me of not knowing what a kernel is and thinking like some ignorant noob saying one kernel is better cause it has a better theme .
Now my regard for Devs and the work they do is very high even for the ones where i don't use their stuff . it would have been for you also before you started slagging me off with your unfounded comments .
I have no intention of prolonging your stupid replies by posting in this thread again .
jje
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Damn, you sir got some serious issues!
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Hi all. I m new to SGS2 got it last month.. But that time CM9 was bi famous.. But battery backup sucked.. So thinking of going back to GB(Not for stock!!) CM7. So can anyone tell me which is the best kernel for CM7...
Thanks in advance!!
Having been here a while, you should know better than to ask a question like that. Stick to the stock CM7 kernel or try some compatible kernels till you find one you like.
you realize cm7 default kernel is optimized for best working and battery, thus i really dont understand for thinking to best that!
MistahBungle said:
Having been here a while, you should know better than to ask a question like that. Stick to the stock CM7 kernel or try some compatible kernels till you find one you like.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The old city ppl we ll be knowing gud and bad abt there city.. I m a new comer.. However CM7 is losing its existence.. I searched upto 4 pages back but no clue of GB kernels.. SO i asked..
BTW thanks for the REPLY:good:
Thread closed
Best ROM, best kernel, those threads don't last here. The best one is the one that works well on your phone. Try them on for size and make your own decision.
Before to make this a debate. I must say that this is all my personal opinions.
I wish you all to know that I have probably flashed all kinds of roms, SEEKING to find some kind of PERFECT rom, but you all know that we as humans will never get and accept something that is perfect, as perfect. (just love be4 she dumps you xD)
So continuing with this thread, I wish to share my experiences with you ALL <3 and hopefully answer all of your questions.
Stock CM9 KERNEL/ROM
Pros: The best one i have tried with almost never changing Battery life, I love it and always return to this bad guy after a bunch of roms with bad battery life. You must get this!
Cons: Little to none customization when it comes to governors.
Siyah x
Pros: considered as the best kernel for almost 78% of the XDA(not really, hehe), they like this because of the multiple governors and for being one of the best kernels with cero problems, always updating. Apart from it, it also supports 2nd rom in recovery, so its perfect.
Cons: as all other kernels, in order to get best battery life, you need to tweak them, change voltages, and it takes time, without changing anything from this kernel, the battery life goes to 90% from 100% with only 4 minutes.
Other kernels
Pros: you get to try new kernels...Woohooo!!!
Cons:just not as good as siyah kernels without customizing them.
So I hope you find this as a little entertainment for both, me and you, with love, bye!....
Seriously, what's the meaning of this thread?
How about a new comparison?
This thread VS this comment
This thread
PROS -
•Something to pass my time
•Keeps a mod busy when they come along and close it
CONS -
•Threads of this kind aren't allowed on XDA because a simple debate can easily get out of hand
•It's a pointless thread and wastes peoples time
This comment
PROS -
•It passes time
•It's kinda funny
•Makes me seem like an arse
CONS -
•None
I'm a product of the system I was born to destroy!
awww
Jokesy said:
Seriously, what's the meaning of this thread?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It really was a nice topic... just letting people know how wonderful stock cm9 is.
Sorry if it didnt make any sense for you :/
Well I like rootbox with fluxi kernel.
Pros-I like it,nothing else matters
Cons-None
Lol
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Ahhh... I dont have anything to say... But debate usually results in a fight...
Peace
Hit Thanks & It will Disappear
Sent from S II Running Official ICS 4.0.4 with Siyah 4.1 [/size]
i am updateing my thunderbolt rom to te latest version. i dont know mutch about kernels. but the coices coming wit the rom is: 3 Kernel selection (siyah,doriminax,CM10) [AROMA]. witch kernel is the best?? i dont care about overclocking at all cause it works smooth without. i hvae read that some kernels makes the phone fastermbetter battery. pleas say witch of the 3 kenels i shoud use?? Thank u!
tonymb91 said:
i am updateing my thunderbolt rom to te latest version. i dont know mutch about kernels. but the coices coming wit the rom is: 3 Kernel selection (siyah,doriminax,CM10) [AROMA]. witch kernel is the best?? i dont care about overclocking at all cause it works smooth without. i hvae read that some kernels makes the phone fastermbetter battery. pleas say witch of the 3 kenels i shoud use?? Thank u!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
FAST REPLY!!!!
tonymb91 said:
i am updateing my thunderbolt rom to te latest version. i dont know mutch about kernels. but the coices coming wit the rom is: 3 Kernel selection (siyah,doriminax,CM10) [AROMA]. witch kernel is the best?? i dont care about overclocking at all cause it works smooth without. i hvae read that some kernels makes the phone fastermbetter battery. pleas say witch of the 3 kenels i shoud use?? Thank u!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know the answer to your question: the best kernel is ...... - the one which works best for you
How can you find out about that:
1. Read about kernel's tunables
2. Flash a kernel
3. Try settings which fit to your needs
4. Observe how your phone behaves on those settings
5. Finetune your settings - if required.
6. Keep the kernel if it meets your expectations or
7. Repeat the steps 1 - 6 on another kernel.
Regards
One made the internet to help remove dectatorial barriers, but one ended up following more laws than before...
He just needed quick help! He had to choose from 3 kernels..
It's like seeing someone drawing and yelling "look, the sign says you're not allowed to swim"...
@OP use dorimanx. It's the most battery sparing for my use
Sent with a homing pigeon
riro1612 said:
One made the internet to help remove dectatorial barriers, but one ended up following more laws than before...
He just needed quick help! He had to choose from 3 kernels..
It's like seeing someone drawing and yelling "look, the sign says you're not allowed to swim"...
@OP use dorimanx. It's the most battery sparing for my use
Sent with a homing pigeon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What if in a few minutes two other guys like you will post here something like that:
The first one: @OP use Siyah works best for me!
The second one: @OP use CM10 works best for me!
And what then? Do you really think that you helped him telling what is best for you? Don't think so.
Regards
Many40 said:
What if in a few minutes two other guys like you will post here something like that:
The first one: @OP use Siyah works best for me!
The second one: @OP use CM10 works best for me!
And what then? Do you really think that you helped him telling what is best for you? Don't think so.
Regards
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't only mention "works best for me". He asked what's the best kernel for making the phone faster and that extends the battery. I shared my experiences of battery sparing with this ROM. And he needed a quick help. Or should he halt his ROM installation and try the kernels just for not being an exception that needs others' experiences and saving his time? Although, he could always have the time to try kernels but AFTER installing the ROM
Sent with a homing pigeon
dorimanx is really good try the mali version its véry good for screen off battery saving and screen on performance **extweaks** its my daily driver.
riro1612 said:
I didn't only mention "works best for me". He asked what's the best kernel for making the phone faster and that extends the battery. I shared my experiences of battery sparing with this ROM. And he needed a quick help. Or should he halt his ROM installation and try the kernels just for not being an exception that needs others' experiences and saving his time? Although, he could always have the time to try kernels but AFTER installing the ROM
Sent with a homing pigeon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What you are saying is very subjective. The rom developer wouldn't include a kernel which is not suitable for daily use to the installation package, so any of the kernels would be good enough for "the first shot" as far as quick decision is required.
BTW, do you really know what are you saing:
"kernel for making the phone faster and that extends the battery"?
Performance and battery saving are rather two extremities - if you tweak a kernel to make your phone faster / more responsive - definately the phone will drain more battery and vice versa.
So important is to find a balance. But this balance might be different for different phones (piece of hardware), firmwares as well as the users
Regards
Many40 said:
What you are saying is very subjective. The rom developer wouldn't include a kernel which is not suitable for daily use to the installation package, so any of the kernels would be good enough for "the first shot" as far as quick decision is required.
BTW, do you really know what are you saing:
"kernel for making the phone faster and that extends the battery"?
Performance and battery saving are rather two extremities - if you tweak a kernel to make your phone faster / more responsive - definately the phone will drain more battery and vice versa.
So important is to find a balance. But this balance might be different for different phones (piece of hardware), firmwares as well as the users
Regards
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes indeed, but he asked and in order to give an answer, you must really have tried this specific kernel so that you can advise him..
Yes I know, but I didn't want to only talk about battery consumption or he would complain about performance, not to forget that the performance of dorimanx is good.. I would rather lose a discussion than not providing help for someone needing it^^
But it doesn't matter what we do, people with "which is the better ROM, kernel, horses" would always ask this question because these ones get registered to just ask it...
Sent with a homing pigeon