What made us go from aosp 2.3 to aokp 4.0 what's the difference? I understand what kanging is but why do all stock ics roms say aokp instead?
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
AOKP is a specific popular ICS ROM available for multiple devices. It is not AOSP, but it is based on AOSP with features added.
jalem said:
AOKP is a specific popular ICS ROM available for multiple devices. It is not AOSP, but it is based on AOSP with features added.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This. It's in the same vein as MIUI.
Sent from my SGH-I777
Related
Why isn't there a Gingerbread AOSP port for the Optimus One?
andy572 is an AOSP Gingerbread AFAIK
ciaox said:
andy572 is an AOSP Gingerbread AFAIK
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess it's AOSP insofar as it's built on Code Aurora and CM sources which both have their roots in AOSP, but isn't that the case with all Android ports?
aosp (android open source project) is the pure original android source which manufacturers use to build their branded phones also used by branches like CM and eventually devs use for their custom roms. everything is based on aosp. it the "source". if you want to call a rom aosp based then it must be completely vanilla
mprou said:
aosp (android open source project) is the pure original android source which manufacturers use to build their branded phones also used by branches like CM and eventually devs use for their custom roms. everything is based on aosp. it the "source". if you want to call a rom aosp based then it must be completely vanilla
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's what I thought. There's none for the P500 right?
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA Premium App
DigitalAnalog said:
That's what I thought. There's none for the P500 right?
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well...the way I see it if you want to get the closest to aosp for a particular device then you'll have to take a stock rom and strip it from all the branded code and bloatware.
That's the curse of android. It's getting modified by manufacturers and carriers so much that it can work to each one device with all this different hardware and gui and filled with bloatware and in result it's becoming a bit difficult to be talking about vanilla version. vanilla compared to what?
i'm trying to working on it pure gingerbread....but it is not simple!
Please try your best devs.. ;-)
any AOKP roms?? For cdma?
Or any reliable ICS roms with some customization? Like bottom status bar and no sense!
All we have for this thing is freaking sense roms and I hate them.... I need some vanilla android
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Wordlywisewiz said:
any AOKP roms?? For cdma?
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
?? Did you check the Dev forum? LINK
Yes I did....
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Psteve said (not quoting him and dont bother pming him) that there are a few developers looking into porting it over... best info I can give on the subject
There's always KM7
Wordlywisewiz said:
any AOKP roms?? For cdma?
Or any reliable ICS roms with some customization? Like bottom status bar and no sense!
All we have for this thing is freaking sense roms and I hate them.... I need some vanilla android
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
there's a cm9 unofficial alpha which isnt very stable (last i checked), there's an ICS ROM which works pretty well (it's called ICS AOSP 4.0.3 or something like that) which I'm running in boot manager along side InfectedROM Eternity 3.0, and there's an unofficial MIUI v4. All of those are made by Joelz. There are other ROMs too, those are just the ones I thought of off the top of my head. You need to read more if you've been to the dev section and still haven't found a single ICS or AOSP ROM
AOKP is going to be a stretch until ICS is properly released. I'm sure it'll be ported with a lot of things working, but also lot of things missing.
We've had AOKP ports for a few weeks now.. Check the CM9 thread.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA Premium App
HI,
im wondering whats the big difference between these two mods?
Are both based on the new kernel of htc?
which one is better at the moment?
Px80 said:
HI,
im wondering whats the big difference between these two mods?
Are both based on the new kernel of htc?
which one is better at the moment?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First off, HTC has nothing to do with it.
Secondly, both versions of CM are based off open source Android and tweaked to the CM team's desires and wants.
CM7 is based off of Gingerbread.
CM9 is from Ice Cream Sandwich
I'd do some research if I were you.
New versions of android.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Just wondering if anyone is working on this, how many people are waiting for it, etc... I like stock android more than sense and with all the htc one based roms out there, is it easier to do a one based GPE Rom than porting CM to our device?
I'd use CM, but I like my Bluetooth audio more than stock android.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 2
dogginsteed said:
Just wondering if anyone is working on this, how many people are waiting for it, etc... I like stock android more than sense and with all the htc one based roms out there, is it easier to do a one based GPE Rom than porting CM to our device?
I'd use CM, but I like my Bluetooth audio more than stock android.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i heard that GPE isnt even stock android, its just de-sensed. besides, there are a million different 4.2.2 AOSP roms already, i dont think anyone would even bother porting over GPE. just my opinion
Every AOSP Rom so far that I've found doesn't have working Bluetooth audio though. The GPE Roms aren't just de-sensed to my knowledge, they aren't AOSP, but they are close enough for me.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 2
dogginsteed said:
Just wondering if anyone is working on this, how many people are waiting for it, etc... I like stock android more than sense and with all the htc one based roms out there, is it easier to do a one based GPE Rom than porting CM to our device?
I'd use CM, but I like my Bluetooth audio more than stock android.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think joelz was at one point
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda premium
We know that there are lots of AOSP based ROMs, such as CM, omni, etc. But why nearly all the developers don't like to migrate original AOSP to our phones, but only CM, omni, carbon, and so many custom ROMs? What's wrong with the original Google code? Anyone know the reason about that? I know that these custom ROMs have many additional features, but I just like pure Android.
No answers？
Sent from my GT-I8190N using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Mostly it is that I think your mistaking google code for pure aosp. They are 2 different things. A pure aosp build has no options and is very plain. Most don't want the bare bones. Also this a development forum, which means that we don't settle core base software. Anyone can sync and build a stock rom
Sent from my One using Tapatalk
zelendel said:
Mostly it is that I think your mistaking google code for pure aosp. They are 2 different things. A pure aosp build has no options and is very plain. Most don't want the bare bones. Also this a development forum, which means that we don't settle core base software. Anyone can sync and build a stock rom
Sent from my One using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got it. Thank you. But in my opinion, build a pure aosp is not easy as you say, probably I'm new here
gaotxx said:
I got it. Thank you. But in my opinion, build a pure aosp is not easy as you say, probably I'm new here
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Depending on the device all you have to do is a set up a build setup, then sync the repo and build it. Not that hard.