Is there anyway we can take the stock ics kernel (linux 3.0) and overclock it to 1.5ghz? Or is the kernel source needed for that
majid25 said:
Is there anyway we can take the stock ics kernel (linux 3.0) and overclock it to 1.5ghz? Or is the kernel source needed for that
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Short answer is no.
There is a longer answer of yes, although I'm not qualified or experienced enough to give it.
And yes, I think you need the source to do it.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA
Don't think so
Related
New to xda, have a rooted, unlocked 2.3.4 ATT atrix.
I'm running faux123's kernel, just wondering what other kernel choices are out there, for over-clocking, etc.
Ty
If I am not wrong so far are 3:
Fau123's: Actually is the one I am using fast & stable, just the bug of the battery after install that need to re calibrate after been install (easy fix)
Edgan: Stable & conservative Nice to give a try
Kholk: Last thing I read, he trow the towel until Motorola release the source of GB code due to a bug in the WIFI module
Kadarn said:
New to xda, have a rooted, unlocked 2.3.4 ATT atrix.
I'm running faux123's kernel, just wondering what other kernel choices are out there, for over-clocking, etc.
Ty
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Is the kernel source only released for moto 2.2 right now?
Yes.
The gb kernel is not officially released.
It's source code will be released after the official release of gb I think..
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
mramirezusa said:
If I am not wrong so far are 3:
Fau123's: Actually is the one I am using fast & stable, just the bug of the battery after install that need to re calibrate after been install (easy fix)
Edgan: Stable & conservative Nice to give a try
Kholk: Last thing I read, he trow the towel until Motorola release the source of GB code due to a bug in the WIFI module
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ty, I have noticed faux123 to be pretty stable also. Possibly will try edgan's tonight.
Sent from my MB860
Paschalis said:
Yes.
The gb kernel is not officially released.
It's source code will be released after the official release of gb I think..
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So how ironic. All this time the 2.2 kernel source has been available, but nobody could compile their own kernel cause with a locked boot loader it couldn't be flashed. Now that we have unlock, everybody is on 2.3.4 so nobody wants a 2.2 custom kernel.
Has anybody tried making a custom 2.2 kernel and flashing it to a 2.2 ROM now that its possible? I'd imagine the kernel will have lots of similar code between the two...
I think the reason the answer is NO because you will loose some proprietary hardware, that I don't think so Motorola will release those codes (aka fingerprint reader)
RogerPodacter said:
So how ironic. All this time the 2.2 kernel source has been available, but nobody could compile their own kernel cause with a locked boot loader it couldn't be flashed. Now that we have unlock, everybody is on 2.3.4 so nobody wants a 2.2 custom kernel.
Has anybody tried making a custom 2.2 kernel and flashing it to a 2.2 ROM now that its possible? I'd imagine the kernel will have lots of similar code between the two...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Maybe a stupid question but i have my reasons to ask this
Is it posible to run old Gingerbread kernel(2.6.x.x) on ICS based ROM's simply by flashing zImage (or whole boot.img) without recompiling kernel
Im guessing not but i need to ask
I'm pretty sure it wont work cuz completely different android versions so u would have to swap out the modules and pretty much have to build from source codes and a lot of work to get it running but by then its not gb anymore and I think u may have though there might be a possibility of getting oc from a gb kernel to ics but it won't work like that
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
Its not because of OC its because of USB OTG
OTG works with Leedroid kernel but i need ICS because of some app that runs only on ics
I guess i will have to wait for someone to add this to ics kernel
pedja1 said:
Its not because of OC its because of USB OTG
OTG works with Leedroid kernel but i need ICS because of some app that runs only on ics
I guess i will have to wait for someone to add this to ics kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haven't you tried it ?
Are kernels from ICS backwards compatible with Jellybean?
majid25 said:
Are kernels from ICS backwards compatible with Jellybean?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you mean forward compatible. :laugh:
I don't think that they are, but I do think that since JB is an incremental upgrade from ICS, it might be easier for the kernel devs to use the ICS source to make JB kernels. Of course, I'm not a kernel dev, so I could be totally wrong.
coal686 said:
I think you mean forward compatible. :laugh:
I don't think that they are, but I do think that since JB is an incremental upgrade from ICS, it might be easier for the kernel devs to use the ICS source to make JB kernels. Of course, I'm not a kernel dev, so I could be totally wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the correction lol
Sent from my PG86100 using xda app-developers app
Agrebren and the "OTHER" kernel both work on JB
The ICS update was released in 2 different countries according to the development forums so I decided to put the firmware on my US Galaxy Tab 10.1. I saw that there was a way to root it already, but once I got it rooted, I found no way to overclock, so does anyone know if there is an overclockable kernel for the official ICS? Does Pershoot have any? Thanks
Hi,
same issue here.
The ICS Kernel from Pershoot is for CM9/10 only and won't work with official ICS from samsung (tried it, no WiFi and Auto Brightness isn't working)
Anyone?
-ThyMaster
Tapa talk is going crazy for me lol.
Basically a custom kernel for the current Official ICS release cannot be made until Samsung release the source code for it. Which they have not done yet.
Once they do, devs like pershoot, will be able to create custom kernels like those currently available for the honeycomb release.
RavenY2K3 said:
Tapa talk is going crazy for me lol.
Basically a custom kernel for the current Official ICS release cannot be made until Samsung release the source code for it. Which they have not done yet.
Once they do, devs like pershoot, will be able to create custom kernels like those currently available for the honeycomb release.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hm,
Kernel sources have been released, any one found a OC 3.x kernel so far?
- ThyMaster
Yes I got one oc kernel build by myself.
Runs fine at 1.2 Ghz but when I clock higher it run into boot loops.
Working for three days on it and I cant seem to figure it out.
I didnt have this problem with the old source code.
Building my own kernels for 6 months now.
My 3.1.10 kernel has bfq scheduler and voodoo sound support and runs at 1.2 Ghz.
I dont make my kernels public because I dont have time to answer noob questions.
But if you interested I could upload the kernel to this threath.
Sent from my GT-P7500 using XDA Premium HD app
overclock
brieuwers said:
Yes I got one oc kernel build by myself.
Runs fine at 1.2 Ghz but when I clock higher it run into boot loops.
Working for three days on it and I cant seem to figure it out.
I didnt have this problem with the old source code.
Building my own kernels for 6 months now.
My 3.1.10 kernel has bfq scheduler and voodoo sound support and runs at 1.2 Ghz.
I dont make my kernels public because I dont have time to answer noob questions.
But if you interested I could upload the kernel to this threath.
Sent from my GT-P7500 using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
See http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1833136
i was expecting the ics releases to have the 3.x Linux kernels but they do not seem to have it. can anyone tell me is it because of htc or does the tbolt not support the kernel...
The leaked ics rom has a 3x kernel. Our aosp doesn't have a 3x kernerl because we don't have ics source for the kernel yet.
Sent from my Thunderbolt using Tapatalk 2
disconnecktie said:
The leaked ics rom has a 3x kernel. Our aosp doesn't have a 3x kernerl because we don't have ics source for the kernel yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This confused me and still does. I thought each Android release went hand-in-hand with a certain kernel version (or higher).
Eclair = Linux kernel 2.6.29
Froyo = 2.6.32
Gingerbread = 2.6.35
Ice Cream Sandwich = 3.0.1
Jelly Bean = 3.1.10
I put the x because I wasn't sure of the exact numbers after the three.
Sent from my Thunderbolt using Tapatalk 2
disconnecktie said:
I put the x because I wasn't sure of the exact numbers after the three.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I understand, but my point was, the AOSP ICS leak is using a 2.6.35 kernel. I would think that makes this a Gingerbread ROM, not an ICS one. I've asked about this in Liquid's thread but got no responses...
hallstevenson said:
I understand, but my point was, the AOSP ICS leak is using a 2.6.35 kernel. I would think that makes this a Gingerbread ROM, not an ICS one. I've asked about this in Liquid's thread but got no responses...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No it is ics framework and system UI. The gb kernel was modified to work with ics. The most important part of the kernel that changed from gb to ics was the ramdisk.
Sent from my Thunderbolt using Tapatalk 2
disconnecktie said:
No it is ics framework and system UI. The gb kernel was modified to work with ics. The most important part of the kernel that changed from gb to ics was the ramdisk.
Sent from my Thunderbolt using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would using the GB kernel be causing some of the display and camera weirdness that folks are calling 'driver' issues on and off? It's awesome that they even got it working at all, let alone as well as it does.
Aggraxis said:
Would using the GB kernel be causing some of the display and camera weirdness that folks are calling 'driver' issues on and off? It's awesome that they even got it working at all, let alone as well as it does.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is exactly the reason for the issues with the camera and some of the graphical issues
Sent from my Thunderbolt using Tapatalk 2
thanks i did not realize that it had a 3.x kernel
i feel like a total n00b.