I'm getting ready to get an s3, but I'm getting confused now. I see it advertised as 1.4 quad core on the international version, but AT&T and Verizon say its 1.5 dual core. Anybody know if this is correct, or misprint on both Verizon & AT&T?
If you could bother as muchs as search forums or google you would allready know.. anyways it's correct information as american versions comes with snapdragon s4 krait with LTE chip inside and dual core.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA
4G LTE apparently has issues working properly with the quad core chip in the GS3. So north america is getting a dual core variant so the network will work properly.
Early reports states that when the next android OS arrives, it fixes the issues the quad core chipset is currently having...but that remains to be seen.
Related
The way I understood the news from today, the LTE hardware is definitely present in EU devices but will simply technically not work in certain countries. Is my assumption correct?
I wonder if that feature will be useful in the future at all then if the frequencies used here are not supported at all?
My understanding is the Lte will be a different galaxy 3 version.
The real question is will the LTE model have the quad core chip or a dual core chip like the One X.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Has there been anything from Samsung that states that the US version will have the S4 chipset. It just does not make an sense that it would not have a chipset made by Samsung. I am guessing we are going get a solid answer on the 29th when they go on their world tour.
I remember their being two conflicting articles from an anonymous Samsung executive about the dual core chip set and LTE compatibly.
As of right now, everything about dual core in US is just rumors. Some sound very reliable. As for me, I highly doubt that the exynos quad would be compatible with Sprint, Verizon, and AT&T LTE network as well as T-mobile HSPA+ 42Mbps. So yeah, chances are there won't be any quad core here
I read a few articles claiming that only T-Mobile would get the quad-core Exynos, but this makes absolutely no sense. The GS3 is 21mbps max, while T-Mobile's "4G" is 42mbps. So, I really doubt that T-Mobile will get the Exynos version, unless they decide that 2 extra cores has more market value than 42mbps HSPA+.
So, it is likely that T-Mobile will get a version that is crippled with the Qcomm S4 chip. Because of the incompatibility of LTE+Exynos, it is also possible for Verizon, ATT, etc to get the dual core version as well. For example, the HTC One X had to be switched to S4 to work on AT&T's LTE network.
Heard long shot rumour US maybe get exynos 5 with arm cortex a-15 2ghz dual core. I'd be OK with that if no exynos 4 quad in US. A-15 performance might be on par with quad A-9.
Though most likely if qualcomm S4 I'm going international.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using Tapatalk 2
trailblazerz11 said:
Heard long shot rumour US maybe get exynos 5 with arm cortex a-15 2ghz dual core. I'd be OK with that if no exynos 4 quad in US. A-15 performance might be on par with quad A-9.
Though most likely if qualcomm S4 I'm going international.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any Cortex-A15 would destroy the quad-core Exynos 4412. But the chance of an A15 being released for the US version is almost nonexistent.
saltmine said:
But the chance of an A15 being released for the US version is almost nonexistent.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe for an upgraded version? Like they did with the Skyrocket or T989...
Can someone shed some light on this for me? I just don't understand why we get to watch HTC come out with the "amazing" quad core One X just to find out that the U.S. carriers only get the dual core version. And now the exact same thing is happening with the Galaxy SIII.
http://androidspin.com/2012/06/01/t-mobile-samsung-galaxy-s-iii-appears-looks-great/
What is the deal with this? Who/what is preventing the quad core version from being offered by the mobile carriers here in the U.S.? Obviously, we can still go buy the GSM version to solve this but then it's not backed by the carrier and there is little to no warranty options for damage/theft. Plus the price difference is really quite large ($200 on contract vs $700 GSM).
So, what's the deal?
the quad core does not play nice with the LTE radios
essentially not working with Verizon and ATT's LTE 4g
But with T-Mobile running on HSPA+ the quad core should work just fine. Why do T-Mobile customers have to suffer due to their competitors inability to adapt?
sn0warmy said:
But with T-Mobile running on HSPA+ the quad core should work just fine. Why do T-Mobile customers have to suffer due to their competitors inability to adapt?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess that is T-Mobile's decision not to grab the quad core over the dual core.
The international phone will work with ATT 3G and T-Mobile, but does not work for LTE Networks.
So technically ATT & T-Mobile could have opted for the quad core
kls629 said:
I guess that is T-Mobile's decision not to grab the quad core over the dual core.
The international phone will work with ATT 3G and T-Mobile, but does not work for LTE Networks.
So technically ATT & T-Mobile could have opted for the quad core
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hm, I wonder if it was cheaper for ATT & T-Mobile to go with the dual core from Samsung over the quad core. They probably also didn't feel it was necessary to pay additional for the quad core since their U.S. competitors aren't going to offer it anyway...
Either way it's annoying, but such is life.
Unless I'm mistaken, to make up for the lack of quad core, the USA model gets 2GB ram.
Personally, I think the handset situation in America is terrible, they have to get locked handsets and pay to receive calls. It's appalling, feel sorry for the customers
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Paid £500 for this "Superphone" and it's gonna be fit for the bin when we eventually get 4g, but I guess it's a good way for Samsung to make more money.
Aren't the dual cores used on the USA version a more advanced cpu than the quadies found on the International s3? I have a feeling the difference in performance between the 2 will be negligible
I'm curious about the technical reasons why the quad core doesn't play with the LTE radio. Does the S4 have functions that the Exynos cannot do or is something about more cores bad for the 4G radio?
Edit: Found out why. Qualcomm is the only one with a modem certified for DC-HSPA
Source: http://www.tmonews.com/2012/05/editorial-why-a-snapdragon-s4-galaxy-s-iii-is-awesome/
Michael_P said:
Paid £500 for this "Superphone" and it's gonna be fit for the bin when we eventually get 4g, but I guess it's a good way for Samsung to make more money.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You should enquire about the JUMP tariff....you get to upgrade every 6 months
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
sn0warmy said:
But with T-Mobile running on HSPA+ the quad core should work just fine. Why do T-Mobile customers have to suffer due to their competitors inability to adapt?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
42 Mbps HSPA+ support apparently also requires a Qualcomm radio.
My galaxy s3 is international unlocked version. Currently I'm using tmobile in America, however I only get edge2 network speed. My plan has 3G network included, and I asked the customer for helping, they said because mine is unlocked version, so I only can get edge network. Is it true?
Btw, how to make sure s3 is quad core or dual core, there is no way to see in the phone settings. Mine is international unlocked version and it supposed to be quad core, just want to make sure.
Thank you.
Unlocked GS3 only doesn't support T-Mobile's 1700MHz network so you're stuck on Edge. The only solution would be switching to AT&T for now. As for how to check quad core cpu, you can use some of the benchmark tools and look up system info.
kobexu said:
INTERNATIONAL GS3 only doesn't support T-Mobile's 1700MHz network so you're stuck on Edge. The only solution would be switching to AT&T for now. As for how to check quad core cpu, you can use some of the benchmark tools and look up system info.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fixed that for you.
OP: the international one is quad core.
Sent via some sort of internet thing
kobexu said:
Unlocked GS3 only doesn't support T-Mobile's 1700MHz network so you're stuck on Edge. The only solution would be switching to AT&T for now. As for how to check quad core cpu, you can use some of the benchmark tools and look up system info.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. I asked AT&T worker before, seemed they weren't positive.
So... Galaxy SIII in Europe comes with quad core processor - or so I've read... Why does the US only get dual core?? Can I use a European SIII on US T-Mobile network if I can get one?
svavrek said:
So... Galaxy SIII in Europe comes with quad core processor - or so I've read... Why does the US only get dual core?? Can I use a European SIII on US T-Mobile network if I can get one?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The US version has qualcomm chip which supports LTE, the Exynos does not... INTL version has 1GB RAM, and qualcomm has 2GB RAM, yes you can use an unlocked INTL I9300 on T-Mobile but will not get LTE and have less RAM... The trade-offs are up to you...
svavrek said:
So... Galaxy SIII in Europe comes with quad core processor - or so I've read... Why does the US only get dual core?? Can I use a European SIII on US T-Mobile network if I can get one?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because the Exynos processor doesn't work with T-Mobile's non-standard 42Mbps on AWS (1700 MHz) and it also doesn't work with the LTE. You can use the international one on T-Mobile but you'll only get EDGE data. If you use it on AT&T though you'll get up to HSPA+ because most of Europe uses the same bands as AT&T (850/1900 MHz). If you want to use international phones, T-Mobile is the worst carrier to be on in terms of data speeds, but they're moving to the same frequency as AT&T, so eventually you'll be able to use it on T-Mobile with up to 21 Mbps.
B-Naughty said:
The qualcomm chip supports LTE, the Exynos does not... INTL version has 1GB RAM, and qualcomm has 2GB RAM, yes you can use an unlocked INTL I9300 on T-Mobile but will not get LTE and have less RAM... The trade-offs are up to you...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To be fair, the i9300 is a lot faster than the US models. But to be honest, unless you game, you won't notice a different. The 2GB of RAM was a "whoops, my bad" from Samsung for having to switch processors; RAM does not affect performance unless you have too little RAM. Even the Nexus 7 comes with 1GB of RAM. But anyways, it depends how you use your phone. The other big thing is that the US models have the "bug" or "feature" where you might lose your IMEI when flashing anything to the phone, with no chance (so far) to get it back, meaning you'd have to do a warranty swap to get a working phone. The i9300 also gets major updates first. Development, I would say, is about the same for both though.
svavrek said:
So... Galaxy SIII in Europe comes with quad core processor - or so I've read... Why does the US only get dual core?? Can I use a European SIII on US T-Mobile network if I can get one?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll try to reply in a nice way before you get flamed by someone. The quad core version (International) does not support LTE, hence we have the dual core setup which does support LTE. You can use an international device on ATT and T Mobile minus LTE. If I recall correctly you may not even get HSPA + either but I don't know if that is true or not.
---------- Post added at 09:45 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:45 AM ----------
Product F(RED) said:
Because the Exynos processor doesn't work with T-Mobile's non-standard 42Mbps on AWS (1700 MHz) and it also doesn't work with the LTE. You can use the international one on T-Mobile but you'll only get EDGE data. If you use it on AT&T though you'll get up to HSPA+ because most of Europe uses the same bands as AT&T (850/1900 MHz). If you want to use international phones, T-Mobile is the worst carrier to be on in terms of data speeds, but they're moving to the same frequency as AT&T, so eventually you'll be able to use it on T-Mobile with up to 21 Mbps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Damn you beat me to it.
Damn we be on this one... LOL
Slight correction. There is a quad-core Exynos that supports LTE. Korea got it, but it wasn't completed by the time the US variants were in full production.
The Root said:
Slight correction. There is a quad-core Exynos that supports LTE. Korea got it, but it wasn't completed by the time the US variants were in full production.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because the LTE radio is separate from the Exynos SoC. The Exynos itself does not support LTE. Think HTC Thunderbolt. What this results in is horrible battery life. The Galaxy Tab 7.7 did the same thing with the Exynos dual-core, adding a separate LTE radio with the Exynos processor. If you need LTE, you're better off with the Snapdragon S4 (which is no slouch btw). We're at a cell phone generation where all CPU's perform pretty much the same (current gen meaning S4 - Tegra 3 - Exynos Quad) until you really push them. So again, unless you're benchmarking or heavily gaming, you won't notice a difference.
Also, yes you'll get HSPA+ on AT&T (I'm using my i9300 on Straight Talk), but only EDGE on T-Mobile.
Product F(RED) said:
The other big thing is that the US models have the "bug" or "feature" where you might lose your IMEI when flashing anything to the phone, with no chance (so far) to get it back, meaning you'd have to do a warranty swap to get a working phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm starting to think even Samsung doesn't have a clue what's really going on with that... or a very ingenius way to sell some phones at full price... Hasn't deterred me any...
B-Naughty said:
I'm starting to think even Samsung doesn't have a clue what's really going on with that... or a very ingenius way to sell some phones at full price... Hasn't deterred me any...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Samsung supports developers. They gave the entire CyanogenMod team Galaxy S II's when they first came out. They hired Steve Kondik (Cyanogen), and they worked with XDA devs to try and fix the ICS recovery perma-brick issue on the SII, Note, and other phones. It's probably the carriers that messed with the software without knowing what they were doing.
if you haven't heard already from previous posts the USA s3 supports lte and the UK one doesn't and we also have 2gb of ram they do not but they have a quad core chip to even it out and to be fair.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S III using Tapatalk 2