Related
Has anyone run Quadrant yet, on their Evo 3D. I have never seen results like this, blows all other phones out of the water. I hit 2105 on it. On my regular Evo rooted, with custom rom, the most i hit is 1100 ish. I am amazed.
Yours is low, my friend said he got about 2250 and the one in the sprint store got about 1500
If the one in the Sprint store got 1500, I think mine is pretty high.
1809
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA Premium App
Highest I have gotten so far is 2343 but these scores really don't mean much.
1000000000000
Because benchmarks don't matter.
2460 here but like he said, doesn't mean much.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
mchuang said:
If the one in the Sprint store got 1500, I think mine is pretty high.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My bad I missed that was your original evo that got 1100. But yeah the one at the sprint store was really low compared to the rest for some reason.
Try cf-bench if you want a more accurate benchmark for dual core devices..
I agree it doesn't mean much but I consistently get 1980-2010. Can't wait till we get root and overclock.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
2141 , For now
i just scored 1952 and then i scored 5132 on cf-bench.... Kinda sad considering that according to benchmarks the Galaxy S2 kills this one :/ avging a 1000 more wtf!
2317 on quadrant
5292 on cf
58.208 on the old linpack
43.8 fps on nenamark1
26.2 fps on nenamark2
60.8 fps on neocore
Edit: new linpack 201.754 highest, really inconsistent tho
mchuang said:
I have never seen results like this, blows all other phones out of the water.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure if serious....
You know what I say when people try and brag about benchmarking scores?
"Oh yeah, I have an ICQ account number that is only 5 digits long!" They respond with "what does that have to do with anything?"
My response. "Yes, exactly"
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
I got... OVER NINE THOUSAND!!!!
LOL @ quadrant
E3D
felacio said:
You know what I say when people try and brag about benchmarking scores?
"Oh yeah, I have an ICQ account number that is only 5 digits long!" They respond with "what does that have to do with anything?"
My response. "Yes, exactly"
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I remember when a 5 digit icq number was actually worth a nice chunk of change. Mine is 6. lol
I do see some value in benchmarks actually. They're good for tracking changes made on the same piece of hardware. People that blindly diss them don't really get what they're for...
felacio said:
You know what I say when people try and brag about benchmarking scores?
"Oh yeah, I have an ICQ account number that is only 5 digits long!" They respond with "what does that have to do with anything?"
My response. "Yes, exactly"
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Funny quadrant don't matter unless its your device with the high score oh then it matters and that applies for every single damn spec we beef over it don't matter unless its your spec that's higher see watch My LG 2x has 8 gigs rom hows it fell to have 4 ?? Don't matter to you guys unless I said 2x ram witch is 512 Evo 3D is 1gig Oh Now that matters cause its you spec that's higher its one big Ass game
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
felacio said:
You know what I say when people try and brag about benchmarking scores?
"Oh yeah, I have an ICQ account number that is only 5 digits long!" They respond with "what does that have to do with anything?"
My response. "Yes, exactly"
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Funny quadrant don't matter unless its your device with the high score oh then it matters and that applies for every single damn spec we beef over it don't matter unless its your spec that's higher see watch My LG 2x has 8 gigs rom hows it fell to have 4 ?? Don't matter to you guys unless I said 2x ram witch is 512 Evo 3D is 1gig Oh Now that matters cause its you spec that's higher its one big Ass game
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
That live wallpaper test honestly made me cringe a little. I am willing to bet though that most live wallpapers I use like microbes will work flawless, so that's all that matters. I'm not very worried about quadrant benchmarks either, at least not right now with the latest update and all seeming to be a little buggy.
Sent from my Inspire 4G using Tapatalk
HarmonyFlame said:
That live wallpaper test honestly made me cringe a little. I am willing to bet though that most live wallpapers I use like microbes will work flawless, so that's all that matters. I'm not very worried about quadrant benchmarks either, at least not right now with the latest update and all seeming to be a little buggy.
Sent from my Inspire 4G using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As a International GNote owner I was impressed. I have never tried a live wallpaper so do not know if the International would fare better, I doubt it. The screen transitions on static wallpaper looked impressive. Would have thought the Quadrant would be higher and the Antutu was right there with the International at 6400+
Overall it looks as though the ATT model has optimized touch wiz well. Initially, the International Note was laggy until a few updates were able to optimize and speed it up significantly.
Overall I think it looks great!
planoman said:
As a International GNote owner I was impressed. I have never tried a live wallpaper so do not know if the International would fare better, I doubt it. The screen transitions on static wallpaper looked impressive. Would have thought the Quadrant would be higher and the Antutu was right there with the International at 6400+
Overall it looks as though the ATT model has optimized touch wiz well. Initially, the International Note was laggy until a few updates were able to optimize and speed it up significantly.
Overall I think it looks great!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your honesty instead of bashing the device,enjoy your note because i know i'll enjoy mines
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using xda premium
That was rather.....meh. But I have no doubt the geniuses at xda will get this thing humming in no time.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
jpeg42 said:
That was rather.....meh. But I have no doubt the geniuses at xda will get this thing humming in no time.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I went from a 900 quadrant score on my SGS4G to a 3.5k so yeah I am sure it will be souped up in no time.
When he opened the app drawer, ATT crapware.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
ICS
I wonder how much better the Note will get with ICS?
Weird, this benchmarks considerably lower than the international version.
http://pocketnow.com/android/samsung-galaxy-note-review
A little disappointing if this is what att version does.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
http://www.gottabemobile.com/2012/02/14/samsung-galaxy-note-initial-speed-and-battery-tests/
The other issue is battery life. Yesterday I used the Galaxy Note heavily since it was my first day and I wanted to try everything. The result is that the battery was down to 4% after about 6 hours.
Not too surprising when overusing your phone the first day though.
mron0903 said:
Weird, this benchmarks considerably lower than the international version.
http://pocketnow.com/android/samsung-galaxy-note-review
A little disappointing if this is what att version does.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is not weird at all. Qualcomm chip just can't compete with Exynose in these benchmarks. It's a well known fact.
jpeg42 said:
http://www.gottabemobile.com/2012/02/14/samsung-galaxy-note-initial-speed-and-battery-tests/
The other issue is battery life. Yesterday I used the Galaxy Note heavily since it was my first day and I wanted to try everything. The result is that the battery was down to 4% after about 6 hours.
Not too surprising when overusing your phone the first day though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
jpeg42,
Did you write the article? Nice job. The battery is something I am looking at closely before getting the ATT version. I have found 25-30% brightness more than adequate on my GNote and as you say it takes several cycles to see the full capacity on the battery. The other area I am interested in is Bluetooth. The International GNote has a BT that is superb! My skyrocket BT sucks and I am hoping it is not because of LTE. The LTE network in Dallas and Texas is top notch which is why I am considering the ATT model. Any insights will be appreciated.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using XDA App
foxbat121 said:
It is not weird at all. Qualcomm chip just can't compete with Exynose in these benchmarks. It's a well known fact.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True, but I wasn't expecting such a huge difference considering that the att note is still a 1.5ghz phone. It's a little disappointing because my atrix benchmarks are around the same at a 1ghz clock speed.
I know rom development is going to be big with the note which is one of the reasons I'll be getting one, along with lte.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Benchmark and real world experience are two different thing. Qualcomm chip is 1-gen older than Exynos.
The new quadrant benchmark that he was using has lower scores in general., I just retested my Dell Streak using the new quadrant and the scores were about 500 points lower. The international note should be re-benchmarked with this new quadrant for perspective. If you notice the other benchmark scores arent really that off par.
Interestingly, Phone Dog just did an update on his 30 day challenge with the Note and just switched to the AT&T version. He's saying that in actual use, he feels like the Snapdragon has been faster than the Exynos. Granted, it's only been a day of use, but still interesting to hear from someone who's been using the International version for a few days and picks up the AT&T version.
http://www.phonedog.com/videos/samsung-galaxy-note-challenge-day-11/
Once we can freeze the bloatware, I'm sure its gonna fly! Even the international version would suffer with all of that installed...
Sent from my Dell Streak using Tapatalk
New Quadrant score for stock Intl. GNote
ucanthang29 said:
The new quadrant benchmark that he was using has lower scores in general., I just retested my Dell Streak using the new quadrant and the scores were about 500 points lower. The international note should be re-benchmarked with this new quadrant for perspective. If you notice the other benchmark scores arent really that off par.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here is my stock Intl GNote on the new quadrant. Was a 4105 now 3753. As many are saying there are objective and subjective benchmarks. The app benchmarks are objective and the personal experience (Flipping the screens etc.) is subjective (Aaron on phone dog). Not sure what the ATT quadrant is, but in the subjective observations I have had on the videos, it looks fine and even snappy. Lisa on mobile tech review says they are comparable and that is good enough for me! lol! The Intl. GNote was not that snappy on screen transitions for a couple of updates but is pretty speedy now! The phones are comparable on the things I will use a phone for and for 90+% of us either model will be fine in performance in my opinion.
So, apparently the One X absolutely destroys the Nexus AND the Transformer Prime. Now THAT'S impressive. Looks like the Snapdragon S4 is promising.
www.product-reviews.net/2012/03/27/htc-one-x-benchmarks-on-att-embarrass-galaxy-nexus/
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA
Why--oh why does it NOT have expandable memory? :'(
What, 32GB ain't enough for ya?
If it comes to sprint I'm definitely getting it. Crushed the asus transformer woe that's one mighty fine dual core
#Root-Hack_Mod*Always\
Terepin said:
What, 32GB ain't enough for ya?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
as the product focus mostly on that oversized camera, not having the ability to hot swap memory cards for what you are filming is just fsking stupid...
---------- Post added at 01:31 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:01 PM ----------
flomexico said:
So, apparently the One X absolutely destroys the Nexus AND the Transformer Prime. Now THAT'S impressive. Looks like the Snapdragon S4 is promising.
www.product-reviews.net/2012/03/27/htc-one-x-benchmarks-on-att-embarrass-galaxy-nexus/
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
looks like that the biggest increases comes from switching between a 266mhz single channel memory interface (s3) to the new 500mhz dual channel one more than from core optimization (which should be still pretty nice as it is cortex-a15-like)
freeza said:
Why--oh why does it NOT have expandable memory? :'(
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That irks the hell out of me, especially when SDXC cards are going to be cropping up more commonly.
Still going to buy it though.
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
freeza said:
Why--oh why does it NOT have expandable memory? :'(
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, my sentiments exactly, but the number one reason that I refuse to buy the x one is the lack of removable battery..... hell no to that.
Thank god for this phone. I love the non removable battery, I hate seeing phones that look like they have car batteries attached to them, no wonder why iPhone users think android people are retarded
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
It says that it scored a 4900 on quadrant, but yet blows away the Transformer Prime. I've tested mine and scored an 5088 with Quadrant. Here is my proof. I am not dissing the One X by any means, I am just stating my Prime can pull the same #'s on tests. To me its how well the OS is built for the phone and what kind of developers we have to make what HTC gives us and transform it into a beast.
bloodrain954 said:
Thank god for this phone. I love the non removable battery, I hate seeing phones that look like they have car batteries attached to them, no wonder why iPhone users think android people are retarded
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For me it's more about choice. You don't have to attach those large batteries but you can if you want to. And all my friends who have iPhones say after a year or so they can't hold a charge any longer. But you can't do anything about that on the iPhone. At least you can replace the standard battery on most Android phones.
But yeah two reasons I won't be getting the One is the lack of expandable storage and no removable battery. I have maps and media installed on my phone and that takes up a good portion of the memory. Also, I need to switch out batteries when I cover E3 or CES as that thing gets used a lot for SMS in communicating with the team (talking is horrible with all the noise at these things) and reading emails and appointments.
The performance does look great and I do like the car dock mode for the One. Honestly, if the Sprint variant had LTE, removable battery, and SD Card slot, I'd swap out my EVO 3D for it
I think the phone looks nice but it's not for me. I have the galaxy note which has expandable memory and battery. That's really important for me. Batteries get worn down or are defective. I had an iPhone 4 which came with a defective battery and all I could do is send it back. If it were any other phone I'd just buy a new one and ask to have it reimbursed. Who knows how the battery life will be on a device with that many cores. Hmmm... I'm still not tempted.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Note.
doeboy711 said:
It says that it scored a 4900 on quadrant, but yet blows away the Transformer Prime. I've tested mine and scored an 5088 with Quadrant. Here is my proof. I am not dissing the One X by any means, I am just stating my Prime can pull the same #'s on tests. To me its how well the OS is built for the phone and what kind of developers we have to make what HTC gives us and transform it into a beast.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your not comparing apples to apples there...you OC'd nodded the Prime. I'm sure they were comparing it to bone stock on both devices.
The Prime should win out GPU wise from what I've read but rest is at the very least a toss up if not S4 in favor...
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
I just enabled the 1.6 that Asus put in there after they gave us ICS. Before ICS, the 1.6 config was not in there, but afterwards it was. So we, Prime owners, just enabled it. I have rooted my Prime, but have not unlocked it or flashed a custom ROM/Kernel yet.
Are there screws somewhere on the phone (like the iPhone) that could be taken off to have access to removing the battery?
ssojyeti2 said:
Are there screws somewhere on the phone (like the iPhone) that could be taken off to have access to removing the battery?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would assume there has to be, because there has to be a way for them to replace a faulty battery in case it ever happens.
I to am hating the no memory card and no removable battery.
I'm not bothered by the battery at all. If it ends up being faulty, get a new one. I can see why the people who travel a lot might miss an extended battery, but there are car chargers and a lot of other accessories that can make that more bearable.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA Premium App
What about if your phone bootloops and you need to pull battery?
Sent from my Xoom using xda premium
xblackvalorx said:
What about if your phone bootloops and you need to pull battery?
Sent from my Xoom using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There will most likely be a three finger reboot method
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
SoraX64 said:
I'm not bothered by the battery at all. If it ends up being faulty, get a new one. I can see why the people who travel a lot might miss an extended battery, but there are car chargers and a lot of other accessories that can make that more bearable.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What part of "non user-replaceable battery" didn't you understand .
I was able to overclock my note 2 to 1800,,, benchmarked at 19206
ronschuck said:
I was able to overclock my note 2 to 1800,,, benchmarked at 19206
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How is the battery after flashing?
ronschuck said:
I was able to overclock my note 2 to 1800,,, benchmarked at 19206
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats actually a little low...bump your gpu up to 640mhz. that got me a best score of 20091.
Yeah I've seen a few others reach over 20,000.
See if your phone can benchmark with the GPU clocked at 800mhz. You'll see some good scores there
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
Meh.
DNA does more than 20k stock.
adrynalyne said:
Meh.
DNA does more than 20k stock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah and it feels much slower in real usage, so who cares about synthetic benchmarks?
Exchanging the DNA for the Note 2 yesterday was the best decision I've ever made. This thing absolutely smokes the DNA in real world performance, most importantly getting around the UI. And the battery life kills it too.
Other than the very sharp screen, the DNA has absolutely nothing going for it compared to other high end smartphones. Not to mention mediocre battery life and laughable storage space. Sense is still awful after all of these years as well. Very slow and heavy.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda premium
adrynalyne said:
Meh.
DNA does more than 20k stock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do not agree with what you say but I will defend your right to say it.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
By now isnt everyone's unlocked Note2 overclocked to 1800?
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
WizeGuyDezignz said:
Yeah and it feels much slower in real usage, so who cares about synthetic benchmarks?
Exchanging the DNA for the Note 2 yesterday was the best decision I've ever made. This thing absolutely smokes the DNA in real world performance, most importantly getting around the UI. And the battery life kills it too.
Other than the very sharp screen, the DNA has absolutely nothing going for it compared to other high end smartphones. Not to mention mediocre battery life and laughable storage space. Sense is still awful after all of these years as well. Very slow and heavy.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
agreed! benchmarks really dont mean much to me...and if i had to guess adrynalyne was just trolling because he hates these type of threads. the lg optimus g breaks 20k easily aswell but i would never own one.
---------- Post added at 11:36 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:33 AM ----------
lostnuke said:
By now isnt everyone's unlocked Note2 overclocked to 1800?
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
actually i keep mine at stock clockspeed with powersaving turned on...plenty fast and it nets me killer battery life. currently at 18hrs up time, 4hr15min screen on, 53% battery.
droidstyle said:
agreed! benchmarks really dont mean much to me...and if i had to guess adrynalyne was just trolling because he hates these type of threads. the lg optimus g breaks 20k easily aswell but i would never own one.
---------- Post added at 11:36 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:33 AM ----------
actually i keep mine at stock clockspeed with powersaving turned on...plenty fast and it nets me killer battery life. currently at 18hrs up time, 4hr15min screen on, 53% battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So that's your secret to getting 7-8 hours on screen time - power saver mode lol. How low does power saver mode clock down the max CPU speed to?
EDIT: Never mind. Power saver brings the CPU down to 1100 Mhz lol Gosh.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
I think since Project butter, benchmarks and high power cpu's arent necessary. Unless you do a lot of gaming.
WizeGuyDezignz said:
Yeah and it feels much slower in real usage, so who cares about synthetic benchmarks?
Exchanging the DNA for the Note 2 yesterday was the best decision I've ever made. This thing absolutely smokes the DNA in real world performance, most importantly getting around the UI. And the battery life kills it too.
Other than the very sharp screen, the DNA has absolutely nothing going for it compared to other high end smartphones. Not to mention mediocre battery life and laughable storage space. Sense is still awful after all of these years as well. Very slow and heavy.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To each their own. I've had both, and I can tell you the Note 2 isn't faster. You just have to look past the animations speeds.
Gahh Its Lee said:
I do not agree with what you say but I will defend your right to say it.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You do not agree that the DNA has higher benchmarks stock?
Alrighty then
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=34670749&postcount=32
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=34671231&postcount=34
That was before kernel source released.
droidstyle said:
agreed! benchmarks really dont mean much to me...and if i had to guess adrynalyne was just trolling because he hates these type of threads. the lg optimus g breaks 20k easily aswell but i would never own one.
---------- Post added at 11:36 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:33 AM ----------
actually i keep mine at stock clockspeed with powersaving turned on...plenty fast and it nets me killer battery life. currently at 18hrs up time, 4hr15min screen on, 53% battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You got it, friend. That was exactly my stance
adrynalyne said:
To each their own. I've had both, and I can tell you the Note 2 isn't faster. You just have to look past the animations speeds.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, keeping benchmarks out of it, how is the DNA faster? In which areas? I have also owned both and it wasn't faster at all for me.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda premium
The DNA's gpu is much better. I'm sure within the next couple of years that will show with games that will be coming out. On the other hand, I'm sure the Note 2 will still be able to play them with some settings turned down, and the DNA will only be able to hold a couple at a time.
WizeGuyDezignz said:
Ok, keeping benchmarks out of it, how is the DNA faster? In which areas? I have also owned both and it wasn't faster at all for me.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Like I said, to each their own. I didn't say the Note 2 was slower, nor did I say the DNA was faster. Read more carefully please and be objective.
flaring afro said:
The DNA's gpu is much better. I'm sure within the next couple of years that will show with games that will be coming out. On the other hand, I'm sure the Note 2 will still be able to play them with some settings turned down, and the DNA will only be able to hold a couple at a time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I saw the Note 2 has the Mali 400 MP. Isn't that the same GPU that's in the Galaxy S3? If so, I wonder why Samsung didn't 'up' the specs in that department.
DroidOnRoids said:
Yeah, I saw the Note 2 has the Mali 400 MP. Isn't that the same GPU that's in the Galaxy S3? If so, I wonder why Samsung didn't 'up' the specs in that department.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably not ready for rollout to cellular devices.
adrynalyne said:
You do not agree that the DNA has higher benchmarks stock?
Alrighty then
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=34670749&postcount=32
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=34671231&postcount=34
That was before kernel source released.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Na I was just being an ass. I respect you a ton I rarely argue anything. To each their own I dont care about benchmarks but some people do.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
Looking for benchmarks from our new n6p. I've done antutu so far. On par with 5x. 45k ish. This is stock on the oldest/first factory image.
I realize our device does not bench great but I've been using it most of the day and it's very snappy more proof benchmarks don't mean much, but if we bench stock then unencrypted, and use custom governed we have something to compare to.
First quadrant
Geek bench
Apologies for the noob question. - but looking at the antutu benchmark screenshot, does it mean that a nexus 6 performs better than the 6p?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You guys are getting low benchmarks...
Ran antutu yesterday and got 57k, and 1310/3950 in geekbench.
Got 62410 in AnTuTu..
?? i get 45k with my 2013 nexus 5, does it heats up or it throtles down too much?
Got this on mine.
Androbench...The NAND is WAY faster than the Nexus 6.
suvo_bh said:
Apologies for the noob question. - but looking at the antutu benchmark screenshot, does it mean that a nexus 6 performs better than the 6p?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not a chance , this phone hasnt stalled once for me yet
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
italia0101 said:
Not a chance , this phone hasnt stalled once for me yet
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's an obvious relief
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Around 50k?? My OPO gets 48k-49k stock.
Those 62K is more on par of what I expected to see.
Would love to see more benchmark scores. I'm waiting till end of Nov for mine.
Rev.Krazy.X said:
4700?? My OPO gets 4800-4900
Those 6200 is more on par of what I expected to see.
Would love to see more benchmark scores. I'm waiting till end of Nov for mine.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OPO is 1080, 6P is 2k. Working harder and using more resources to draw the extra pixels.
Batfink33 said:
OPO is 1080, 6P is 2k. Working harder and using more resources to draw the extra pixels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Man you quoted me before I edited my post for typo's lol
QHD shouldn't make that much of a difference. Note 5 and S6 have QHD and pulling 66K. Yes better processor but not 16k better.
Rev.Krazy.X said:
Man you quoted me before I edited my post for typo's lol
QHD shouldn't make that much of a difference. Note 5 and S6 have QHD and pulling 66K. Yes better processor but not 16k better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Remember the S810 is being throttled heavier than the Exynos also.
richport29 said:
Got this on mine.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you! I was about to cancel my order (for the 3rd time). Whoops...... forgot that I started buying accessories to prevent me from canceling again! But glad to see good scores.
wayne8821212 said:
Thank you! I was about to cancel my order (for the 3rd time). Whoops...... forgot that I started buying accessories to prevent me from canceling again! But glad to see good scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Every review and users are saying it's lightning fast but I guess if I downloaded an app that gave me an arbitrary number I would also cancel/sell my phone ?
Coming from a note 5, I don't notice any real world difference. Smoother with no bloat, no aggressive memory management. Runs great!
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
suvo_bh said:
Apologies for the noob question. - but looking at the antutu benchmark screenshot, does it mean that a nexus 6 performs better than the 6p?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I may have run that in the first ten minutes of first boot and it may not represent actual readings? Now I've had 1 day of use I ran the test again, however now I'm not encrypted.
Antutu:
Geekbench: https://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/4014427
Stock, unrooted