Has anyone run Quadrant yet, on their Evo 3D. I have never seen results like this, blows all other phones out of the water. I hit 2105 on it. On my regular Evo rooted, with custom rom, the most i hit is 1100 ish. I am amazed.
Yours is low, my friend said he got about 2250 and the one in the sprint store got about 1500
If the one in the Sprint store got 1500, I think mine is pretty high.
1809
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA Premium App
Highest I have gotten so far is 2343 but these scores really don't mean much.
1000000000000
Because benchmarks don't matter.
2460 here but like he said, doesn't mean much.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
mchuang said:
If the one in the Sprint store got 1500, I think mine is pretty high.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My bad I missed that was your original evo that got 1100. But yeah the one at the sprint store was really low compared to the rest for some reason.
Try cf-bench if you want a more accurate benchmark for dual core devices..
I agree it doesn't mean much but I consistently get 1980-2010. Can't wait till we get root and overclock.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
2141 , For now
i just scored 1952 and then i scored 5132 on cf-bench.... Kinda sad considering that according to benchmarks the Galaxy S2 kills this one :/ avging a 1000 more wtf!
2317 on quadrant
5292 on cf
58.208 on the old linpack
43.8 fps on nenamark1
26.2 fps on nenamark2
60.8 fps on neocore
Edit: new linpack 201.754 highest, really inconsistent tho
mchuang said:
I have never seen results like this, blows all other phones out of the water.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure if serious....
You know what I say when people try and brag about benchmarking scores?
"Oh yeah, I have an ICQ account number that is only 5 digits long!" They respond with "what does that have to do with anything?"
My response. "Yes, exactly"
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
I got... OVER NINE THOUSAND!!!!
LOL @ quadrant
E3D
felacio said:
You know what I say when people try and brag about benchmarking scores?
"Oh yeah, I have an ICQ account number that is only 5 digits long!" They respond with "what does that have to do with anything?"
My response. "Yes, exactly"
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I remember when a 5 digit icq number was actually worth a nice chunk of change. Mine is 6. lol
I do see some value in benchmarks actually. They're good for tracking changes made on the same piece of hardware. People that blindly diss them don't really get what they're for...
felacio said:
You know what I say when people try and brag about benchmarking scores?
"Oh yeah, I have an ICQ account number that is only 5 digits long!" They respond with "what does that have to do with anything?"
My response. "Yes, exactly"
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Funny quadrant don't matter unless its your device with the high score oh then it matters and that applies for every single damn spec we beef over it don't matter unless its your spec that's higher see watch My LG 2x has 8 gigs rom hows it fell to have 4 ?? Don't matter to you guys unless I said 2x ram witch is 512 Evo 3D is 1gig Oh Now that matters cause its you spec that's higher its one big Ass game
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
felacio said:
You know what I say when people try and brag about benchmarking scores?
"Oh yeah, I have an ICQ account number that is only 5 digits long!" They respond with "what does that have to do with anything?"
My response. "Yes, exactly"
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Funny quadrant don't matter unless its your device with the high score oh then it matters and that applies for every single damn spec we beef over it don't matter unless its your spec that's higher see watch My LG 2x has 8 gigs rom hows it fell to have 4 ?? Don't matter to you guys unless I said 2x ram witch is 512 Evo 3D is 1gig Oh Now that matters cause its you spec that's higher its one big Ass game
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
Related
http://m.zdnet.com/blog/gadgetreviews/99-for-at-ts-3d-phone-lg-thrill-4g-confirmed/26496
shook187 said:
http://m.zdnet.com/blog/gadgetreviews/99-for-at-ts-3d-phone-lg-thrill-4g-confirmed/26496
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Eh going by price, it makes it seem cheap to me. Will it sell more, possibly cus of price. But will it be better.....nahhhh
Sent in 3D fashion
I don't see it as competition but an expansion of 3D directed content. Hope more 3D phones come out.
Sent from my BEASTO 3D using XDA Premium App
It only has a 1ghz dual processor so, not as good as the 3vo right off the bat.
twcrosno said:
It only has a 1ghz dual processor so, not as good as the 3vo right off the bat.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"Though the HTC Evo 3ds dual core CPU clocks at a slightly faster speed at 1.2 GHz, the Thrill 4G makes up for its slower clock speed with its dual memory channels." Dual channels?
No 4G, slower, half the RAM. PERFECT!!!
More importantly, why the hell would you care? I can't concern myself with the Jones's or what they are buying.
Honestly? Have you used an LG phone? There is no comparison. It's not competition. Not to mention it might be cheaper to start with but consider the network its on and the price you pay to be on that network.......we win in the end.
Noiro said:
I don't see it as competition but an expansion of 3D directed content. Hope more 3D phones come out.
Sent from my BEASTO 3D using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly. I don't really consider it "competition". It's another 3d phone on another network. Hopefully, it will help with the increased 3d market as fast as apps, games and other content.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
Yeah, I wouldn't get to cranked up over this. 99 bucks? You get what you pay for.
My ''xDU4L C0R3 SH00T3Rx'' shot you down in 3D!
Meh doesn't even come close.
twcrosno said:
It only has a 1ghz dual processor so, not as good as the 3vo right off the bat.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL
Are you serious?
It will run circles around the Evo 3d.
KingKuba13 said:
LOL
Are you serious?
It will run circles around the Evo 3d.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe half circles
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA Premium App
Lol ok guys, be nice. Can someone explain to us all though how dual memory channels will make up for the slower cpu and less ram? Someone with knowledge please help us all out lol. Not this wah wah ****
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA Premium App
It may be $100 cheaper, but remember AT&T has a $325 ETF not $200 like Sprint. Plus their rate plans are a little bit more expensive.
Specs wise, it might be lower resolution but if it's like the 2x it's an IPS panel verses SLCD which looks better if it doesn't have the light bleed problem that plagued the 2x. As for dual channel memory, it allows the memory to be interacted with faster, but can't be filled if that makes any sense. So there can't be as memory hungry apps running, but it does help benchmarks for speed.
the LG has a TI WiLink chipset which is better (has more features like ANT+) than our Broadcom's.
KingKuba13 said:
LOL
Are you serious?
It will run circles around the Evo 3d.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Someone get this poor kid a doctor. He hit his head pretty hard.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA Premium App
I am actually happy! Regardless if it is better or not, the more 3d phone out there the more 3d content!!!
http://www.gsmarena.com/lg_optimus_3d-review-622.php
Oh I was wandering why nobody I know has an optimus 3D.
Sent from my EVO 3D on the now or later network
iliapiano said:
I am actually happy! Regardless if it is better or not, the more 3d phone out there the more 3d content!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This should be true. They need a couple more and we should start seeing 3D content like crazy.
Sprint and soon ATT. Then tmobile then Verizon?
Sent from my EVO 3D on the now or later network
By TechnoBuffalo
Damn what quadrant is he using cause I don't get that.
Sent from the Almighty Note!
Yeah theres something weird about those scores. He was definitly using the old quadrant for the international but from everything I have seen the ATT places very close to the INT with the new quadrant. Not much of a "review"
1700.... what? I got 3900 my first time, and then broke around 4000 every other time.
imitenotbecrazy said:
Yeah theres something weird about those scores. He was definitly using the old quadrant for the international but from everything I have seen the ATT places very close to the INT with the new quadrant. Not much of a "review"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It was most definitely the old quadrant, the video was probably recorded before quadrant was updated, but who said anything about a review..?
3954 using updated quadrant.
Pushed 4300 on older version.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App
I'm thinking of upgrading to this device from a SGII. But I really want to be able to tell the difference if I'm going to make this upgrade. Would have went to a sprint store and tested this myself if that were possible.
I was curious and ran a quadrant benchmark and here's what I got
Almost identical as yours. Lol
____________
Just Flash It !!!
Because benchmarks are so useful. The benchmark can drastically change depending on what type of storage you use or other factors that barely effect real performance.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2
MДЯCЦSДИT said:
Because benchmarks are so useful. The benchmark can drastically change depending on what type of storage you use or other factors that barely effect real performance.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you know of a better way to test to see if something is upgrade or not?
I love the new resolution and screen size and increased ram but that isn't enough for me to upgrade.
Thanks to all who posted results.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2
When I first got the phone they were much lower, quad was around 3100, wonder why, I didn't make any changes
Edit: oops on the antutu shot lol it was 6500ish
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda premium
MДЯCЦSДИT said:
Because benchmarks are so useful. The benchmark can drastically change depending on what type of storage you use or other factors that barely effect real performance.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cause it's fun to have big numbers!!
rgregg504 said:
When I first got the phone they were much lower, quad was around 3100, wonder why, I didn't make any changes
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah my benchmarks were all over the place, ranging from 3500 to 5000.
Here's mine, 16gb white us on sprint.
Thanks for the benchmarks. After reviewing the results I may have to pass on this one. It was either a sg3 or a psp and after seeing the gpu scores I'm going to go with the psp vita. I didn't really have a upgrade yet so I was actually considering either buying one off contract or buying a family members upgrade.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2
numero9 said:
Here's mine, 16gb white us on sprint.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess nicer phones do go faster haha
Sent from my SPH-L710 using XDA
http://www.businessinsider.com/iphone-5-a6-processor-benchmark-2012-9
Anyone know what program they used to get these numbers, and what would a lean, non-stock EVO 4G LTE run?
Thanks
its called Geekbench
eww
kevg77 said:
http://www.businessinsider.com/iphone-5-a6-processor-benchmark-2012-9
Anyone know what program they used to get these numbers, and what would a lean, non-stock EVO 4G LTE run?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the s3 was just under the iphone running ics but hit over 1700 on jellybean. the processor looks respectable but really just an upper end score and not better than a top android phone running jellybean. that said benchmarks are funny. my n7 only hits 3500 on quadrant but wins in antutu over my lte.
i just ran it on my lte with tranquility rom and hit 1627
i got a 1606
still higher than the iphone 5
flex360 said:
i got a 1606
still higher than the iphone 5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah and our phone is three months old too.
Just pulled 1692 on Bareback rom, Nova launcher. OC at 1674
OC to 1809 got 1796 score.
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
meh, I liken benchmarks to making great dyno numbers with your car but not producing at the track
scott_0 said:
meh, I liken benchmarks to making great dyno numbers with your car but not producing at the track
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seen a guy bragging about marks and showing his car off. The first time the idiot hits the track, torque flips the car and he looks like he's about to cry
I don't think you can compare oc kernels. Should test stock. Either way the lte wins
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
what benchmark are they talking about?? what app they using?????? nevermind i just baught the app only 99 cents... ok i got 1640 not to shabby!! question why does the evo LTE get no love?? half the time its not even talked about when it comes to testing.. always talking about the one s and x... the evo lte beats every phone that i have seen.. real talk... why do people sleep on our phone...?
evo401 said:
what benchmark are they talking about?? what app they using?????? nevermind i just baught the app only 99 cents... ok i got 1640 not to shabby!! question why does the evo LTE get no love?? half the time its not even talked about when it comes to testing.. always talking about the one s and x... the evo lte beats every phone that i have seen.. real talk... why do people sleep on our phone...?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was wondering the same thing, but its probably because our phone is not international.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
I was able to overclock my note 2 to 1800,,, benchmarked at 19206
ronschuck said:
I was able to overclock my note 2 to 1800,,, benchmarked at 19206
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How is the battery after flashing?
ronschuck said:
I was able to overclock my note 2 to 1800,,, benchmarked at 19206
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats actually a little low...bump your gpu up to 640mhz. that got me a best score of 20091.
Yeah I've seen a few others reach over 20,000.
See if your phone can benchmark with the GPU clocked at 800mhz. You'll see some good scores there
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
Meh.
DNA does more than 20k stock.
adrynalyne said:
Meh.
DNA does more than 20k stock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah and it feels much slower in real usage, so who cares about synthetic benchmarks?
Exchanging the DNA for the Note 2 yesterday was the best decision I've ever made. This thing absolutely smokes the DNA in real world performance, most importantly getting around the UI. And the battery life kills it too.
Other than the very sharp screen, the DNA has absolutely nothing going for it compared to other high end smartphones. Not to mention mediocre battery life and laughable storage space. Sense is still awful after all of these years as well. Very slow and heavy.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda premium
adrynalyne said:
Meh.
DNA does more than 20k stock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do not agree with what you say but I will defend your right to say it.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
By now isnt everyone's unlocked Note2 overclocked to 1800?
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
WizeGuyDezignz said:
Yeah and it feels much slower in real usage, so who cares about synthetic benchmarks?
Exchanging the DNA for the Note 2 yesterday was the best decision I've ever made. This thing absolutely smokes the DNA in real world performance, most importantly getting around the UI. And the battery life kills it too.
Other than the very sharp screen, the DNA has absolutely nothing going for it compared to other high end smartphones. Not to mention mediocre battery life and laughable storage space. Sense is still awful after all of these years as well. Very slow and heavy.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
agreed! benchmarks really dont mean much to me...and if i had to guess adrynalyne was just trolling because he hates these type of threads. the lg optimus g breaks 20k easily aswell but i would never own one.
---------- Post added at 11:36 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:33 AM ----------
lostnuke said:
By now isnt everyone's unlocked Note2 overclocked to 1800?
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
actually i keep mine at stock clockspeed with powersaving turned on...plenty fast and it nets me killer battery life. currently at 18hrs up time, 4hr15min screen on, 53% battery.
droidstyle said:
agreed! benchmarks really dont mean much to me...and if i had to guess adrynalyne was just trolling because he hates these type of threads. the lg optimus g breaks 20k easily aswell but i would never own one.
---------- Post added at 11:36 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:33 AM ----------
actually i keep mine at stock clockspeed with powersaving turned on...plenty fast and it nets me killer battery life. currently at 18hrs up time, 4hr15min screen on, 53% battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So that's your secret to getting 7-8 hours on screen time - power saver mode lol. How low does power saver mode clock down the max CPU speed to?
EDIT: Never mind. Power saver brings the CPU down to 1100 Mhz lol Gosh.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
I think since Project butter, benchmarks and high power cpu's arent necessary. Unless you do a lot of gaming.
WizeGuyDezignz said:
Yeah and it feels much slower in real usage, so who cares about synthetic benchmarks?
Exchanging the DNA for the Note 2 yesterday was the best decision I've ever made. This thing absolutely smokes the DNA in real world performance, most importantly getting around the UI. And the battery life kills it too.
Other than the very sharp screen, the DNA has absolutely nothing going for it compared to other high end smartphones. Not to mention mediocre battery life and laughable storage space. Sense is still awful after all of these years as well. Very slow and heavy.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To each their own. I've had both, and I can tell you the Note 2 isn't faster. You just have to look past the animations speeds.
Gahh Its Lee said:
I do not agree with what you say but I will defend your right to say it.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You do not agree that the DNA has higher benchmarks stock?
Alrighty then
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=34670749&postcount=32
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=34671231&postcount=34
That was before kernel source released.
droidstyle said:
agreed! benchmarks really dont mean much to me...and if i had to guess adrynalyne was just trolling because he hates these type of threads. the lg optimus g breaks 20k easily aswell but i would never own one.
---------- Post added at 11:36 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:33 AM ----------
actually i keep mine at stock clockspeed with powersaving turned on...plenty fast and it nets me killer battery life. currently at 18hrs up time, 4hr15min screen on, 53% battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You got it, friend. That was exactly my stance
adrynalyne said:
To each their own. I've had both, and I can tell you the Note 2 isn't faster. You just have to look past the animations speeds.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, keeping benchmarks out of it, how is the DNA faster? In which areas? I have also owned both and it wasn't faster at all for me.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda premium
The DNA's gpu is much better. I'm sure within the next couple of years that will show with games that will be coming out. On the other hand, I'm sure the Note 2 will still be able to play them with some settings turned down, and the DNA will only be able to hold a couple at a time.
WizeGuyDezignz said:
Ok, keeping benchmarks out of it, how is the DNA faster? In which areas? I have also owned both and it wasn't faster at all for me.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Like I said, to each their own. I didn't say the Note 2 was slower, nor did I say the DNA was faster. Read more carefully please and be objective.
flaring afro said:
The DNA's gpu is much better. I'm sure within the next couple of years that will show with games that will be coming out. On the other hand, I'm sure the Note 2 will still be able to play them with some settings turned down, and the DNA will only be able to hold a couple at a time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I saw the Note 2 has the Mali 400 MP. Isn't that the same GPU that's in the Galaxy S3? If so, I wonder why Samsung didn't 'up' the specs in that department.
DroidOnRoids said:
Yeah, I saw the Note 2 has the Mali 400 MP. Isn't that the same GPU that's in the Galaxy S3? If so, I wonder why Samsung didn't 'up' the specs in that department.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably not ready for rollout to cellular devices.
adrynalyne said:
You do not agree that the DNA has higher benchmarks stock?
Alrighty then
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=34670749&postcount=32
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=34671231&postcount=34
That was before kernel source released.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Na I was just being an ass. I respect you a ton I rarely argue anything. To each their own I dont care about benchmarks but some people do.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2