AT&T Galaxy Note VS. International Version: Side by Side comparison. - AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717

By TechnoBuffalo

Damn what quadrant is he using cause I don't get that.
Sent from the Almighty Note!

Yeah theres something weird about those scores. He was definitly using the old quadrant for the international but from everything I have seen the ATT places very close to the INT with the new quadrant. Not much of a "review"

1700.... what? I got 3900 my first time, and then broke around 4000 every other time.

imitenotbecrazy said:
Yeah theres something weird about those scores. He was definitly using the old quadrant for the international but from everything I have seen the ATT places very close to the INT with the new quadrant. Not much of a "review"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It was most definitely the old quadrant, the video was probably recorded before quadrant was updated, but who said anything about a review..?

3954 using updated quadrant.
Pushed 4300 on older version.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App

Related

What's your Evo3d Benchmark on Quadrant?

Has anyone run Quadrant yet, on their Evo 3D. I have never seen results like this, blows all other phones out of the water. I hit 2105 on it. On my regular Evo rooted, with custom rom, the most i hit is 1100 ish. I am amazed.
Yours is low, my friend said he got about 2250 and the one in the sprint store got about 1500
If the one in the Sprint store got 1500, I think mine is pretty high.
1809
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA Premium App
Highest I have gotten so far is 2343 but these scores really don't mean much.
1000000000000
Because benchmarks don't matter.
2460 here but like he said, doesn't mean much.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
mchuang said:
If the one in the Sprint store got 1500, I think mine is pretty high.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My bad I missed that was your original evo that got 1100. But yeah the one at the sprint store was really low compared to the rest for some reason.
Try cf-bench if you want a more accurate benchmark for dual core devices..
I agree it doesn't mean much but I consistently get 1980-2010. Can't wait till we get root and overclock.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
2141 , For now
i just scored 1952 and then i scored 5132 on cf-bench.... Kinda sad considering that according to benchmarks the Galaxy S2 kills this one :/ avging a 1000 more wtf!
2317 on quadrant
5292 on cf
58.208 on the old linpack
43.8 fps on nenamark1
26.2 fps on nenamark2
60.8 fps on neocore
Edit: new linpack 201.754 highest, really inconsistent tho
mchuang said:
I have never seen results like this, blows all other phones out of the water.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure if serious....
You know what I say when people try and brag about benchmarking scores?
"Oh yeah, I have an ICQ account number that is only 5 digits long!" They respond with "what does that have to do with anything?"
My response. "Yes, exactly"
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
I got... OVER NINE THOUSAND!!!!
LOL @ quadrant
E3D
felacio said:
You know what I say when people try and brag about benchmarking scores?
"Oh yeah, I have an ICQ account number that is only 5 digits long!" They respond with "what does that have to do with anything?"
My response. "Yes, exactly"
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I remember when a 5 digit icq number was actually worth a nice chunk of change. Mine is 6. lol
I do see some value in benchmarks actually. They're good for tracking changes made on the same piece of hardware. People that blindly diss them don't really get what they're for...
felacio said:
You know what I say when people try and brag about benchmarking scores?
"Oh yeah, I have an ICQ account number that is only 5 digits long!" They respond with "what does that have to do with anything?"
My response. "Yes, exactly"
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Funny quadrant don't matter unless its your device with the high score oh then it matters and that applies for every single damn spec we beef over it don't matter unless its your spec that's higher see watch My LG 2x has 8 gigs rom hows it fell to have 4 ?? Don't matter to you guys unless I said 2x ram witch is 512 Evo 3D is 1gig Oh Now that matters cause its you spec that's higher its one big Ass game
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
felacio said:
You know what I say when people try and brag about benchmarking scores?
"Oh yeah, I have an ICQ account number that is only 5 digits long!" They respond with "what does that have to do with anything?"
My response. "Yes, exactly"
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Funny quadrant don't matter unless its your device with the high score oh then it matters and that applies for every single damn spec we beef over it don't matter unless its your spec that's higher see watch My LG 2x has 8 gigs rom hows it fell to have 4 ?? Don't matter to you guys unless I said 2x ram witch is 512 Evo 3D is 1gig Oh Now that matters cause its you spec that's higher its one big Ass game
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App

AT&T Samsung Galaxy S2 Skyrocket is Snapdragon

yep, it's true. The new at&t GS2 "skyrocket" will rock a snapdragon which can beat beaten with a 1.2 ghz exynos.
and if you have it oc'd to 1.6ghz like i do.... then you know the rest. lol
plus, if you're worrying about LTE, the GS2 get's 21mbps up as well as the "skyrocket". so really, if you want a bigger screen with less power, get the new one.
I'll keep my GS2 and try out the HTC Vivid as well for the camera.
pguillory08 said:
yep, it's true. The new at&t GS2 "skyrocket" will rock a snapdragon which can beat beaten with a 1.2 ghz exynos.
and if you have it oc'd to 1.6ghz like i do.... then you know the rest. lol
plus, if you're worrying about LTE, the GS2 get's 21mbps up as well as the "skyrocket". so really, if you want a bigger screen with less power, get the new one.
I'll keep my GS2 and try out the HTC Vivid as well for the camera.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Trusted source link please
Nvm, you're spreading rumors... 2 posts.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
I work there lol. but i go back to work on thursday, so i'll see if i can get some documentation for you man. i know it sucks, but yeah :/
i wanted it for a sec. and i'm still iffy, bc that snapdragon might not be that bad.
wack. i can't post a link!
pguillory08 said:
I work there lol. but i go back to work on thursday, so i'll see if i can get some documentation for you man. i know it sucks, but yeah :/
i wanted it for a sec. and i'm still iffy, bc that snapdragon might not be that bad.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where is "there" at&t or samsung...but then again i wouldn't believe u untill u proved it lol
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using xda premium
Overclock
How did you overclock...and what effect does it have on the phone...
lol at&t man, my bad.
and i used the zedomax OC kernal.
I'm a beginner on this from an iphone and so far i'm loving this phone more than anything.
now i'm trying to see what ROM i want on here. i seen a lot of ppl going with CM7.
any thoughts guys?
Where do you live that gets 21 MBPS on HSPA?
The fastest I ever got was 5MBPS and that was in an AT&T store. Everywhere else is only 1-3MBPS.
vl221 said:
Where do you live that gets 21 MBPS on HSPA?
The fastest I ever got was 5MBPS and that was in an AT&T store. Everywhere else is only 1-3MBPS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I too would like to know about 21mbps. Also I saw you said you can't post links but you work for at&t. What exactly did you read our have documentation of that has the specs of the skyrocket? Does the document have all the specs of the phone? Some people are saying things like it has 1.3 ram instead of 1. Are you able to clarify some of these speculations and tell us what exactly this phone is supposed to have?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
xAnimal5 said:
Trusted source link please
Nvm, you're spreading rumors... 2 posts.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, since the Exynos only comes in 1.2Ghz and 1.4Ghz we know for sure it's not that.
Here's the stats for the version launched in Korea. It's Qualcomm.
http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/09/samsung-galaxy-s-ii-lte-phone-surfaces-in-korea-codenamed-celox/
My bad, I meant capable of getting 21mbps.
But yeah, if you wanna pay a restocking fee of $35 for the phone plus an extra $80, and a weaker pro lessor. Do it. Just saying. My gs2 on 1.4-1.6ghz is awesome.
Yeah. I'm new on here so I can't post links yet it's 1gb of ram. Even the nexus isn't exynos.
pguillory08 said:
My bad, I meant capable of getting 21mbps.
But yeah, if you wanna pay a restocking fee of $35 for the phone plus an extra $80, and a weaker pro lessor. Do it. Just saying. My gs2 on 1.4-1.6ghz is awesome.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No restocking fee for people who purchased it on Amazon. Free return shipping also.
pguillory08 said:
Yeah. I'm new on here so I can't post links yet it's 1gb of ram. Even the nexus isn't exynos.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AT&T website showed 1.3GB. Someone posted a link yesterday on the skyrocket thread..
If you search, I have seen up to 14mbps down and usually 1.1 up. I posted a pic of it...
below are 2 recent pics...
Posted by Mr.Junky on other post. http://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone1=4124&idPhone2=4130
Only issue I see is that it list the OG SGS2 as still having the FM radio and the pic of the Ltd version is of a i9100 or something with the physical home button.
Sent From My KICKASS CM7 AT&T SGS2
RockRatt said:
Posted by Mr.Junky on other post. http://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone1=4124&idPhone2=4130
Only issue I see is that it list the OG SGS2 as still having the FM radio and the pic of the Ltd version is of a i9100 or something with the physical home button.
Sent From My KICKASS CM7 AT&T SGS2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think that will be the Skyrocket will it?
I would love to have a physical home button.
vl221 said:
No restocking fee for people who purchased it on Amazon. Free return shipping also.
AT&T website showed 1.3GB. Someone posted a link yesterday on the skyrocket thread..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well that's what's up on Amazon. But yeah, no 1.3gb ram.
Are those specs confirmed to be the Skyrocket?
The specs of this phone is really getting crazy. I just googled skyrocket and another site was saying qhd screen resolution. Haha. I know that its not true but its funny how nobody can get this right.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
shansmi said:
If you search, I have seen up to 14mbps down and usually 1.1 up. I posted a pic of it...
below are 2 recent pics...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I live in DFW as well but have never seen speeds like that. Maybe it's the time of day you ran the test. What speeds are you getting during the day when the network is busier?

AT&T Galaxy Note Benchmarked by Phone Arena

That live wallpaper test honestly made me cringe a little. I am willing to bet though that most live wallpapers I use like microbes will work flawless, so that's all that matters. I'm not very worried about quadrant benchmarks either, at least not right now with the latest update and all seeming to be a little buggy.
Sent from my Inspire 4G using Tapatalk
HarmonyFlame said:
That live wallpaper test honestly made me cringe a little. I am willing to bet though that most live wallpapers I use like microbes will work flawless, so that's all that matters. I'm not very worried about quadrant benchmarks either, at least not right now with the latest update and all seeming to be a little buggy.
Sent from my Inspire 4G using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As a International GNote owner I was impressed. I have never tried a live wallpaper so do not know if the International would fare better, I doubt it. The screen transitions on static wallpaper looked impressive. Would have thought the Quadrant would be higher and the Antutu was right there with the International at 6400+
Overall it looks as though the ATT model has optimized touch wiz well. Initially, the International Note was laggy until a few updates were able to optimize and speed it up significantly.
Overall I think it looks great!
planoman said:
As a International GNote owner I was impressed. I have never tried a live wallpaper so do not know if the International would fare better, I doubt it. The screen transitions on static wallpaper looked impressive. Would have thought the Quadrant would be higher and the Antutu was right there with the International at 6400+
Overall it looks as though the ATT model has optimized touch wiz well. Initially, the International Note was laggy until a few updates were able to optimize and speed it up significantly.
Overall I think it looks great!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your honesty instead of bashing the device,enjoy your note because i know i'll enjoy mines
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using xda premium
That was rather.....meh. But I have no doubt the geniuses at xda will get this thing humming in no time.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
jpeg42 said:
That was rather.....meh. But I have no doubt the geniuses at xda will get this thing humming in no time.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I went from a 900 quadrant score on my SGS4G to a 3.5k so yeah I am sure it will be souped up in no time.
When he opened the app drawer, ATT crapware.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
ICS
I wonder how much better the Note will get with ICS?
Weird, this benchmarks considerably lower than the international version.
http://pocketnow.com/android/samsung-galaxy-note-review
A little disappointing if this is what att version does.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
http://www.gottabemobile.com/2012/02/14/samsung-galaxy-note-initial-speed-and-battery-tests/
The other issue is battery life. Yesterday I used the Galaxy Note heavily since it was my first day and I wanted to try everything. The result is that the battery was down to 4% after about 6 hours.​
Not too surprising when overusing your phone the first day though.
mron0903 said:
Weird, this benchmarks considerably lower than the international version.
http://pocketnow.com/android/samsung-galaxy-note-review
A little disappointing if this is what att version does.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is not weird at all. Qualcomm chip just can't compete with Exynose in these benchmarks. It's a well known fact.
jpeg42 said:
http://www.gottabemobile.com/2012/02/14/samsung-galaxy-note-initial-speed-and-battery-tests/
The other issue is battery life. Yesterday I used the Galaxy Note heavily since it was my first day and I wanted to try everything. The result is that the battery was down to 4% after about 6 hours.​
Not too surprising when overusing your phone the first day though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
jpeg42,
Did you write the article? Nice job. The battery is something I am looking at closely before getting the ATT version. I have found 25-30% brightness more than adequate on my GNote and as you say it takes several cycles to see the full capacity on the battery. The other area I am interested in is Bluetooth. The International GNote has a BT that is superb! My skyrocket BT sucks and I am hoping it is not because of LTE. The LTE network in Dallas and Texas is top notch which is why I am considering the ATT model. Any insights will be appreciated.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using XDA App
foxbat121 said:
It is not weird at all. Qualcomm chip just can't compete with Exynose in these benchmarks. It's a well known fact.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True, but I wasn't expecting such a huge difference considering that the att note is still a 1.5ghz phone. It's a little disappointing because my atrix benchmarks are around the same at a 1ghz clock speed.
I know rom development is going to be big with the note which is one of the reasons I'll be getting one, along with lte.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Benchmark and real world experience are two different thing. Qualcomm chip is 1-gen older than Exynos.
The new quadrant benchmark that he was using has lower scores in general., I just retested my Dell Streak using the new quadrant and the scores were about 500 points lower. The international note should be re-benchmarked with this new quadrant for perspective. If you notice the other benchmark scores arent really that off par.
Interestingly, Phone Dog just did an update on his 30 day challenge with the Note and just switched to the AT&T version. He's saying that in actual use, he feels like the Snapdragon has been faster than the Exynos. Granted, it's only been a day of use, but still interesting to hear from someone who's been using the International version for a few days and picks up the AT&T version.
http://www.phonedog.com/videos/samsung-galaxy-note-challenge-day-11/
Once we can freeze the bloatware, I'm sure its gonna fly! Even the international version would suffer with all of that installed...
Sent from my Dell Streak using Tapatalk
New Quadrant score for stock Intl. GNote
ucanthang29 said:
The new quadrant benchmark that he was using has lower scores in general., I just retested my Dell Streak using the new quadrant and the scores were about 500 points lower. The international note should be re-benchmarked with this new quadrant for perspective. If you notice the other benchmark scores arent really that off par.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here is my stock Intl GNote on the new quadrant. Was a 4105 now 3753. As many are saying there are objective and subjective benchmarks. The app benchmarks are objective and the personal experience (Flipping the screens etc.) is subjective (Aaron on phone dog). Not sure what the ATT quadrant is, but in the subjective observations I have had on the videos, it looks fine and even snappy. Lisa on mobile tech review says they are comparable and that is good enough for me! lol! The Intl. GNote was not that snappy on screen transitions for a couple of updates but is pretty speedy now! The phones are comparable on the things I will use a phone for and for 90+% of us either model will be fine in performance in my opinion.

Lets see some benchmarks

I'm thinking of upgrading to this device from a SGII. But I really want to be able to tell the difference if I'm going to make this upgrade. Would have went to a sprint store and tested this myself if that were possible.
I was curious and ran a quadrant benchmark and here's what I got
Almost identical as yours. Lol
____________
Just Flash It !!!
Because benchmarks are so useful. The benchmark can drastically change depending on what type of storage you use or other factors that barely effect real performance.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2
MДЯCЦSДИT said:
Because benchmarks are so useful. The benchmark can drastically change depending on what type of storage you use or other factors that barely effect real performance.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you know of a better way to test to see if something is upgrade or not?
I love the new resolution and screen size and increased ram but that isn't enough for me to upgrade.
Thanks to all who posted results.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2
When I first got the phone they were much lower, quad was around 3100, wonder why, I didn't make any changes
Edit: oops on the antutu shot lol it was 6500ish
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda premium
MДЯCЦSДИT said:
Because benchmarks are so useful. The benchmark can drastically change depending on what type of storage you use or other factors that barely effect real performance.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cause it's fun to have big numbers!!
rgregg504 said:
When I first got the phone they were much lower, quad was around 3100, wonder why, I didn't make any changes
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah my benchmarks were all over the place, ranging from 3500 to 5000.
Here's mine, 16gb white us on sprint.
Thanks for the benchmarks. After reviewing the results I may have to pass on this one. It was either a sg3 or a psp and after seeing the gpu scores I'm going to go with the psp vita. I didn't really have a upgrade yet so I was actually considering either buying one off contract or buying a family members upgrade.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2
numero9 said:
Here's mine, 16gb white us on sprint.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess nicer phones do go faster haha
Sent from my SPH-L710 using XDA

[Q] iPhone 5 benchmarks

http://www.businessinsider.com/iphone-5-a6-processor-benchmark-2012-9
Anyone know what program they used to get these numbers, and what would a lean, non-stock EVO 4G LTE run?
Thanks
its called Geekbench
eww
kevg77 said:
http://www.businessinsider.com/iphone-5-a6-processor-benchmark-2012-9
Anyone know what program they used to get these numbers, and what would a lean, non-stock EVO 4G LTE run?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the s3 was just under the iphone running ics but hit over 1700 on jellybean. the processor looks respectable but really just an upper end score and not better than a top android phone running jellybean. that said benchmarks are funny. my n7 only hits 3500 on quadrant but wins in antutu over my lte.
i just ran it on my lte with tranquility rom and hit 1627
i got a 1606
still higher than the iphone 5
flex360 said:
i got a 1606
still higher than the iphone 5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah and our phone is three months old too.
Just pulled 1692 on Bareback rom, Nova launcher. OC at 1674
OC to 1809 got 1796 score.
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
meh, I liken benchmarks to making great dyno numbers with your car but not producing at the track
scott_0 said:
meh, I liken benchmarks to making great dyno numbers with your car but not producing at the track
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seen a guy bragging about marks and showing his car off. The first time the idiot hits the track, torque flips the car and he looks like he's about to cry
I don't think you can compare oc kernels. Should test stock. Either way the lte wins
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
what benchmark are they talking about?? what app they using?????? nevermind i just baught the app only 99 cents... ok i got 1640 not to shabby!! question why does the evo LTE get no love?? half the time its not even talked about when it comes to testing.. always talking about the one s and x... the evo lte beats every phone that i have seen.. real talk... why do people sleep on our phone...?
evo401 said:
what benchmark are they talking about?? what app they using?????? nevermind i just baught the app only 99 cents... ok i got 1640 not to shabby!! question why does the evo LTE get no love?? half the time its not even talked about when it comes to testing.. always talking about the one s and x... the evo lte beats every phone that i have seen.. real talk... why do people sleep on our phone...?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was wondering the same thing, but its probably because our phone is not international.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium

Categories

Resources