Quadrant score with ics - Motorola Droid RAZR

What quadrant score do you get with stock ics on your phone?
I get around 2800 which to me seems low
Sent from my DROID RAZR using xda premium

I agree it's not that high. But, quadrant score aren't a fully accurate measure of how a system runs. I used to get the same score on my desire z with a ics port when clocked at 1ghz.
Sent from my XT910 using xda premium

i got 5977 on stock ICS

dbittle59 said:
i got 5977 on stock ICS
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess you're talking about AnTuTu... never ever you got this points on Quadrant. My best points was 3240, but on Custom ICS.
Gesendet von meinem XT910 mit Tapatalk 2

2967 rooted stock ics. Although i believe quadrant means nothing.
__
€ incognito »
™

HSD-Pilot said:
I guess you're talking about AnTuTu... never ever you got this points on Quadrant. My best points was 3240, but on Custom ICS.
Gesendet von meinem XT910 mit Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry yes u are correct antutu

Hindle1225 said:
2967 rooted stock ics. Although i believe quadrant means nothing.
__
€ incognito »
™
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can't compare different Devices with Quadrant, that's right. But you can see if changes on your Phone (Roms/Scripts...) take effect in positiv way or not.
Gesendet von meinem XT910 mit Tapatalk 2

HSD-Pilot said:
But you can see if changes on your Phone (Roms/Scripts...) take effect in positiv way or not.
Gesendet von meinem XT910 mit Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with that statement, but.... In my experience with editing scripts, framework mods or roms. You can tell effectiveness of said above changes just with use. Sometimes your your phone will run better but quadrant will say otherwise and visa versa.
__
€ incognito »
™

Mines always 3200 +. Doesn't matter if I reboot or d; nothing to just use it and randomly run quafrant
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

I like running Sunspider. It's run through your browser and runs Java tests. It's a very thorough benchmark and something I run before and after every update, or when I get a new device. Lower numbers are better, as the results are in milliseconds taken to run the test.
http://www.webkit.org/perf/sunspider-0.9.1/sunspider-0.9.1/driver.html

Noob here....how do you check this ?? i just manually updated my razr to ICS and would like to check this score for S & M's....please and thank you!

blueizee said:
Noob here....how do you check this ?? i just manually updated my razr to ICS and would like to check this score for S & M's....please and thank you!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Download the Quadrant app from the Play Store and run the test.

For the chip that phone has you should get around 2500/3500 which is pretty good on quadrant. That app is really accurate i had the htc sensation which got around 2700 quadrant score. Now i own the htc evo 4g lte and it get around 5100 quadrant score. You can feel the difference in the speed. The newer s4 chip make any phone that has it fast. I was a skeptic of the power the s4 Qualcomm chip but i believe now. Twice as fast as last year duel cores.
Sent from my EVO using XDA Premium App

WizeGuyDezignz said:
Download the Quadrant app from the Play Store and run the test.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Going to give it a try now...THANKS!
---------- Post added at 07:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:13 PM ----------
ok i ran full benchmark and its not showing me any results...what am i looking for...too damn confusing for me
and its asking to send my results to the web and i do so and then it just shows me a graph of a bunch of phones and tablets...thats it >??

blueizee said:
Going to give it a try now...THANKS!
---------- Post added at 07:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:13 PM ----------
ok i ran full benchmark and its not showing me any results...what am i looking for...too damn confusing for me
and its asking to send my results to the web and i do so and then it just shows me a graph of a bunch of phones and tablets...thats it >??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL, no problem! Your score should be inside the bar graph that says "Your phone" or "Your device". I forget what it exactly says without looking at it right now lol.

s
my maximum memory ram available is 285mb, how do I solve this???

Quadrant +/- 3200
Antutu 6442

Related

[Q] Sunspider benchmarks?

Anyone done it?
Btw.
Samsung GalaxyS: 6300
HTC Desire: ~5000
HTC DesireHD: 2500 (O'c to 1.5GHz)
Apple iPad2: 2100
SGSII?
Edit: Samsung GalaxyS: 3100 (CM7), 2133 @ 1.44GHz
From PC Pro:
It loaded the full BBC homepage in four seconds dead, completed the SunSpider test in three seconds, and most impressive of all, gained a score of 3,460 points in the Android-specific Quadrant test.
pulser_g2 said:
From PC Pro:
It loaded the full BBC homepage in four seconds dead, completed the SunSpider test in three seconds, and most impressive of all, gained a score of 3,460 points in the Android-specific Quadrant test.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess those 3seconds mean 3000ms because test ran for at least 10seconds or more. That is comparable to DHD, but it means sunspider is not threaded and hence irrelevant because browser definately uses both cores.
How could iPad score that well? I guess browser is much optimized.
if you give me a link i'll run it now.
Like this?
nordichardware.se/images/labswedish/artiklar/Smartphones/samsung.galaxy.s.2/fullimages/sunspider.png
Burko said:
if you give me a link i'll run it now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.webkit.org/perf/sunspider-0.9.1/sunspider-0.9.1/driver.html
DemonoftheMall said:
Like this?
nordichardware.se/images/labswedish/artiklar/Smartphones/samsung.galaxy.s.2/fullimages/sunspider.png
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hmm. 3400 is not as fast as I expected...
3167
Burko
Burko said:
3167
Burko
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I expected at least iPad2 scores, but more important is that browser is generally very fast and smooth and it runs flash
2477 here.
baron von bubba said:
2477 here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Overclocked or just governor performance?
running @ 1500mhz. not really played with the govener settings yet, need to find out a little more about the differences between the settings.
1919 here, im beating the Ipad hahahaha, overclocked, dolphin browser/desktopmode. No major tweaks btw
Edit: Jumped to 2100 on the second run, the test seems to differ from time to time.
5678, [email protected]3, JVH, no o'c. GSII here I come
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
2133! SGS1 CM7 @1.44GHz
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
1346 with Opera mobile 10 @ 1660 MHZ with angelom rom
edit: got right now 1289 with same config as above

[Q] (Q)Best rom and kernel for longest On time

After 2 weeks using my At&t atrix I realize that this handphone doesnt meet my requirement. I hope i can have a phone that will stand minimum a day without plug in for charging. Using my atrix for twitter, browsing and 4 miling list, it only can stand for maximum 8 hours.
Can anyone suggest me what is the best rom (and maybe kernel) for longest on time...?
thanks before
greyrevolver said:
After 2 weeks using my At&t atrix I realize that this handphone doesnt meet my requirement. I hope i can have a phone that will stand minimum a day without plug in for charging. Using my atrix for twitter, browsing and 4 miling list, it only can stand for maximum 8 hours.
Can anyone suggest me what is the best rom (and maybe kernel) for longest on time...?
thanks before
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have tried a bunch of ROM's. All give good battery life with Faux Stopgap+ 1.0GHz kernel. You will have to UV to get the best life. I am now getting 12+ hours with pretty heavy use, and could go 40hrs with low to medium use. Currently on Darkside ROM, but get same results with CM7 also.
I have WiFi and data on all day, but get best battery life using WiFi with screen on only and turning Wifi off while at work, which is how I can achieve the times above.
Ok, thanks for the info,already flash the kernel and will see if this kernel can make my phone stand for a day
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
CM7 nightly build 20 gave me the longest standby time. But I guess every phone is different.
After using the kernel for a day, the result isn't very good. Only stand for 6 hours.I attach the batt statistic. Why when the phone in idle the batt consume still high?
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
I think that the answer to this question isnt as clear as one may think...
1. CM7 while working good is still in beta, and Im assuming that it will stay there until CM9 arrives...
2.MIUI one of the more popular roms is currently in Alpha stages.
I believe that these two are probaly the most popular ROMs around, and not just for the MAtrix. I think that once we start seeing stable builds of both, it would just come down to a matter of preference.
For the time being, I use CM7. Its stable enough for everyday use, however it still has bugs here and there.
I'm desperately waiting for CM9 and I think that MIUI definitively deserves a try. In the near future I'm positive that this question would be a little bit easier to answer.
Btw what the best way to do UV ?
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
SetCPU is the best way
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
crossxn said:
SetCPU is the best way
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, try the apps, I set the voltage to 850 for cpu 1000, the phone is boot loop. Is there any suggest for best setting the cpu voltage?
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
greyrevolver said:
Yes, try the apps, I set the voltage to 850 for cpu 1000, the phone is boot loop. Is there any suggest for best setting the cpu voltage?
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have to experiment. Every phone is different. There are already numerous threads with info on this. Also, I now use System Tuner Pro instead of SetCPU. More options and better overall in my opinion.
---------- Post added at 01:12 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:12 PM ----------
greyrevolver said:
After using the kernel for a day, the result isn't very good. Only stand for 6 hours.I attach the batt statistic. Why when the phone in idle the batt consume still high?
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have to UV as I mentioned before to get the best results.
CaelanT said:
Have to experiment. Every phone is different. There are already numerous threads with info on this. Also, I now use System Tuner Pro instead of SetCPU. More options and better overall in my opinion.
---------- Post added at 01:12 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:12 PM ----------
You have to UV as I mentioned before to get the best results.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You do UV using system tuner pro? Ok ill try that apps..
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk

Geekbench Anyone?

Can someone with an overclocked S3 1.6ghz or 1.7ghz please run Geekbench?
I want to see the score vs the new A6 which just got featured and i cant run overclocked myself right now.
Thanks
Is Geekbench an accepted Benchmark? How accurate is it? The scores seem to be all over the place with the Nexus 7 with the crappy tegra 3 beating the GS3 in one test while the GS3 beating it in another. Don't really trust it if the results change on the fly like that. haha
irzero said:
Can someone with an overclocked S3 1.6ghz or 1.7ghz please run Geekbench?
I want to see the score vs the new A6 which just got featured and i cant run overclocked myself right now.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For what it's worth here:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032744
It was set at 1704mhz
Here is 1600mhz:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032776
For gits and shiggles here is 1400mhz:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032818
To compare clock for clock I set to 1000mhz, but left at quad core...though not sure it that actually matters...
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032862
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
2081 you got on 1.7ghz, running ics..
My name is Optimus Prime and I send this message..
irzero said:
Can someone with an overclocked S3 1.6ghz or 1.7ghz please run Geekbench?
I want to see the score vs the new A6 which just got featured and i cant run overclocked myself right now.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I posted some scores on Beyond3D:
Nebuchadnezzar said:
I'm getting 1854, 1574, 1292 respectively for 4, 3 and 2 cores. So the final score doesn't seem to scale that well with cores, which is obvious consindering there's single-core performance tests.
Here's the Exynos [email protected] 1Ghz with only 2 cores for a clock-for-clock comparison;
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/compare/1032330/1030202
And here's @ stock 1.4Ghz with 4 cores, frequency locked:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/compare/1032351/1030202
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The A6 clearly and undisputedly has the upper hand here. The score may be lower but we're talking about vast IPC and frequency disparities here. The Cortex's are getting slaughtered in memory bandwidth.
And here's a 1704MHz bench for the hell for it: 2283 score.
Would be interesting if somebody with a Krait phone would run it at 1GHz and stock frequency respectively.
I hit 1800 at stock on Jelly bean Omega rom V26.
I might try and clock this phone and see what happens
What a junk benchmark.. kept running It till I got this.. my lowest was 1520..
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Wanam Lite Stock stock LI1 blows the iphone away, I get 1780.
NOTE: My S3 is not OC'd, this was at the default 1400mhz with stock kernel (3.0.31-111170 [email protected] #1
Tomatoes8 said:
Is Geekbench an accepted Benchmark? How accurate is it? The scores seem to be all over the place with the Nexus 7 with the crappy tegra 3 beating the GS3 in one test while the GS3 beating it in another. Don't really trust it if the results change on the fly like that. haha
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fade777 said:
What a junk benchmark.. kept running It till I got this.. my lowest was 1520..
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any benchmark tool will be 'all over the place' depending on what is running in the background. Yes, you can turn off wireless, BT, data etc., but apps will still be launching and closing in the background which will affect the score. After all, these are supposed to be multitasking devices aren't they ?
Also, it's an inaccurate score if you actually go and forcibly disable system apps that would be running on a stock device, just to get a faster score.
Best way to use ANY benchmark tool is to get the device as near to stock as you can (consider a rom flash / data reset followed by very basic config) and then run the test a few times and take an average score. When I run benchmarks (Antutu, Quadrant, Geekbench), my results are often 'all over the place', so if I go with just one test, it would be luck of the draw really.
That said, my average score on S3 stock, rooted, unclocked in Geekbench 2.3.4 is 1586.
Funnily, when overclocked, the average was 1537
im on official (unofficial ) jellybean im updating to the latest leak now then i will come back with results that rape apple a6 cpu hard and in the arse
1830 at stock is my best so far without optimising anything other than a reboot.
The scores are higher on everything other than Memory Performance which is where Apple have beefed up the SoC.
How many points iphone5 do?
Enviado do meu GT-I9300
eric-filth said:
How many points iphone5 do?
Enviado do meu GT-I9300
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1601
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
This is my score... I use stock jb xxdli7...
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
This benchmark tests a combination of single and multi-threaded tasks. So obviously it will be all over the place when comparing an A9 quad-core phone to an A15 or Krait dual core phone. The phones also run differently clocked/speed memory, so tasks which are memory intensive would give a higher score to phones with faster memory.
I'm running Siyah kernel on Omega v26.1 and consistently get scores between 2000 and 2100. Only over-clocked to 1600MHz though.
siyah kernel + setcpu(performance,deadline,1704MHz)
Lucmuzz said:
I'm running Siyah kernel on Omega v26.1 and consistently get scores between 2000 and 2100. Only over-clocked to 1600MHz though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My score was almost identical with 1.6ghz on Omega 26.1
xtechx said:
For what it's worth here:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032744
It was set at 1704mhz
Here is 1600mhz:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032776
For gits and shiggles here is 1400mhz:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032818
To compare clock for clock I set to 1000mhz, but left at quad core...though not sure it that actually matters...
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032862
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gits and Shiggles! I like that one Gotta rember that!
Now to my answer: You just posted a useless thread and flamed about us members, now you want us to help you?
"How about you get a life?" Is what you said. Go ask someone else, or use the search engine by the same company that created Android "Google", ever heard of it? It's a really good site!
Let us know, what you have found..
familyguy59 said:
Gits and Shiggles! I like that one Gotta rember that!
Now to my answer: You just posted a useless thread and flamed about us members, now you want us to help you?
"How about you get a life?" Is what you said. Go ask someone else, or use the search engine by the same company that created Android "Google", ever heard of it? It's a really good site!
Let us know, what you have found..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What the f*ck are you talking about, you absolute schizo! :what:
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium

Whats your nenamark2 benchmark?

Just downloaded this app and would like to compare
Changed my device name to one x to gain access to games which devs marked as not compatible
At 1.2 GHz stock rom modified by me
Kernel panic
Sent from my iPhone 4s running ics 4.0.4
.587 custom by me, stock kernel (locked bl)
updated drivers
Judging by benchmark???
Then why are you here..? Go and get a new device with high hardware ability, and you can get Amazing benchmarks.......
Benchmarks means nothing, it will just confuse you & make you think 'am i a fool?? Why did i buy this device'?? ........
Mine
Auto Signature™ by Tapatalk 2.6 Beta said:
Sent from my WT19i using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My result,
Sent from my ST15i using xda premium
stanlin salu said:
Judging by benchmark???
Then why are you here..? Go and get a new device with high hardware ability, and you can get Amazing benchmarks.......
Benchmarks means nothing, it will just confuse you & make you think 'am i a fool?? Why did i buy this device'?? ........
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That ain't gonna happen man!
Just broke my friends score with his nexus s!
I first thought he may get above 50fps, but to my disappointment it was just 23
As I am asking my friends to tell me their nenamark I am realizing that this phone can go further and has a lot of development left to do
Sent from my iPhone 4s running ics 4.0.4
Lol, Bencmark score will constantly change every minutes, thats why benchmark is not reliable
Singgih4050 said:
Lol, Bencmark score will constantly change every minutes, thats why benchmark is not reliable
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're right!
But, my phone is constant @45.8fps - 47.0fps
Sent from my ST15i using xda premium
Exactly
@Kuriboo
Sent from my iPhone 4s running ics 4.0.4

Antutu finally updated.

I know benchmarks don't matter except for the theoretical performance of a device but Antutu finally updated their app and I was curious how other people's 6Ps were doing on the 3D benchmark. Post your screenshots.
I'll download the 3D benchmark, and let you know when it's finished.
Update: not such a big score...
Time to close a few running background apps and see if it matters..
Update2: tried again, with another lower score... Thermal throttling perhaps..?
Update 3: Better this time.
Enviado do meu Nexus 6P através de Tapatalk

			
				
Casmo said:
I'll download the 3D benchmark, and let you know when it's finished.
Update: not such a big score...
Time to close a few running background apps and see if it matters..
Update2: tried again, with another lower score... Thermal throttling perhaps..?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Reboot then force close the apps that start on boot. I'm about to try that to see if the Marshmallow memory management is better than previous versions.
That's a possibility. I just got this and my phone wasn't running hot. Benchmarks are so inconsistent and useless in most situations. Lol. My only guess for a practical application of this benchmark is to see what ROM runs better on the same hardware. The only real way to compare hardware would be to be running the same exact ROM on each phone then see how well the hardware can perform the tasks with that ROM, but then, the results could be in favor of the losing device with a different ROM. This is impossible to do though because certain things are required for certain hardware. I'm going off on a tangent now so I'm gonna stop here. Haha.
My 6P is very fast. Does that count?
WizeGuyDezignz said:
My 6P is very fast. Does that count?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes! Just the answer I was looking for.
Well, let it cool a bit, the results gets higher
Enviado do meu Nexus 6P através de Tapatalk
Yep pretty good
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
chubby65 said:
Yep pretty good
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which rom?
looks good to me...
ncsuwolfs said:
looks good to me...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How's this look?
Full stock.
WizeGuyDezignz said:
Which rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock rom with elementalX
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
very nice score... Did you do some overclocking with elementalx and what are your settings ??
Thanks.
chubby65 said:
Stock rom with elementalX
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
fethi2 said:
very nice score... Did you do some overclocking with elementalx and what are your settings ??
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No overclocking just kept everything as stock just enjoying the extras that come with the kernel mate
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
Are you using Snapdragon 850 or something ??
And of course Adreno 500
joe_donkor said:
How's this look?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
---------- Post added at 01:40 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:37 PM ----------
Very nice well done and happy for you then
chubby65 said:
No overclocking just kept everything as stock just enjoying the extras that come with the kernel mate
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
fethi2 said:
Are you using Snapdragon 850 or something ??
And of course Adreno 500
---------- Post added at 01:40 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:37 PM ----------
Very nice well done and happy for you then
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is the first phone I've had that I feel that overclocking isn't needed
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
chubby65 said:
This is the first phone I've had that I feel that overclocking isn't needed
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ab-so-lutely! Haven't even rooted my 6P yet (normally done within a couple of days) :good:

Categories

Resources