CyanogenMod plans a quick leap to Jelly Bean for version 10, existing devices likely to tag along
The crew's early looks suggest that there will only be a few minor tweaks needed to merge Google's latest with the custom Android code, making CyanogenMod 10 a relative snap to produce. The update's release is still very much up in the air without the Android Open Source Project code available to modify; that said, device compatibility also isn't expected to be an obstacle. Any device that can run CyanogenMod 9 should run version 10 when it's released. As long as we're willing to wait for a stable 9.0 to emerge first, there are few barriers to making Jelly Bean that much sweeter.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/05/cyanogenmod-plans-a-quick-leap-to-jelly-bean-for-version-10/
while our cm9 is not stable yet, when we grab official ics drivers, it should be easy to jump jellybean wagon
Is it really gonna be cm10? Figured they would do like 9.x
Sent from my MB855 using xda app-developers app
DWake014 said:
Is it really gonna be cm10? Figured they would do like 9.x
Sent from my MB855 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yep.
Many have asked whether JB will be CM9.1 or CM10. Keeping with the pattern thus far, every newly named AOSP update results in a bump to the CM major version. This has the added benefit of fitting into the pattern of [insert codename position in the english alphabet] = CM version. Examples being: G is the 7th letter thus CM7, I is the 9th letter thus CM9 and J = 10.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://plus.google.com/117962666888533781522/posts/PNJutPNhixo
DWake014 said:
Is it really gonna be cm10? Figured they would do like 9.x
Sent from my MB855 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because CyanogenMod's Eclair, Froyo, and Gingerbread were CM 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3? Wait a minute, my Gingerbread CM ROM is 7? Confusing?
They didn't do point releases for Android's 2.0 point releases; no reason they'll do it for 4.0's point releases.
The number is the numerical placement of the code word in this instance j is the tenth letter so cm10 just as I is the 9th. They plan to keep using this naming structure from what I read.
Sent from my MB855 using Tapatalk 2
I vote for it to be called CMX
U know u want it.
But I am looking forward to a stable version of Google now. And that camera. Seems legit. Estimated time before alpha release around Aug/Sept maybe? But that's just my guess. I personally have no idea.
Sent from my CND'd MoPho
Jellybean source has dropped!! http://www.zdnet.com/google-open-so...-4-1-for-third-party-modification-7000000570/
When will the roms be released?
Sent from my MB855 using xda app-developers app
apidroid said:
When will the roms be released?
Sent from my MB855 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really? an eta on something that just dropped? Psh.
meeok2 said:
Jellybean source has dropped!! http://www.zdnet.com/google-open-so...-4-1-for-third-party-modification-7000000570/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But still no Photon drivers, so nothing terribly exciting IMHO...............
willysp said:
But still no Photon drivers, so nothing terribly exciting IMHO...............
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here. Still waiting on those drivers Motorola, Hello!!!
lroy said:
Same here. Still waiting on those drivers Motorola, Hello!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What does drivers do?
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
LexLuger82 said:
What does drivers do?
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Drivers are directions that tells your hardware how to interact with the software. At this point, we are frankenstein. We use different parts of other phones in order to make ours work. We need directions explicitly for our phone.
Sent from my CM9ed MoPho!
Acvice said:
Drivers are directions that tells your hardware how to interact with the software. At this point, we are frankenstein. We use different parts of other phones in order to make ours work. We need directions explicitly for our phone.
Sent from my CM9ed MoPho!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh ok
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
Acvice said:
Drivers are directions that tells your hardware how to interact with the software. At this point, we are frankenstein. We use different parts of other phones in order to make ours work. We need directions explicitly for our phone.
Sent from my CM9ed MoPho!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well with that in mind, I would imagine we'll be able to use most of the Atrix drivers when that's released, since that's 99% the same phone, and is scheduled for a Q3 ICS release, as opposed to the Photon's Q4.
bray424 said:
Well with that in mind, I would imagine we'll be able to use most of the Atrix drivers when that's released, since that's 99% the same phone, and is scheduled for a Q3 ICS release, as opposed to the Photon's Q4.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was just thinking this the other day. Then it dawned on me... What do I know? Hope that statement is true.
Sent from my MB855 using xda app-developers app
It has a snapdragon processor, we have tegra.
Sent from my CM9ed MoPho!
Acvice said:
It has a snapdragon processor, we have tegra.
Sent from my CM9ed MoPho!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AFAIK, the Atrix has the Nvidia Tegra 2 and the Atrix 2 uses a TI Omap CPU.
hirent said:
AFAIK, the Atrix has the Nvidia Tegra 2 and the Atrix 2 uses a TI Omap CPU.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He was referring to the atrix 2.. And i could have sworn i read it had a snapdragon. Guess i was mistaken.
Sent from my CM9ed MoPho!
Acvice said:
He was referring to the atrix 2.. And i could have sworn i read it had a snapdragon. Guess i was mistaken.
Sent from my CM9ed MoPho!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm pretty sure he just said atrix, in reference to the original atrix, which is on motorola's update schedule for a Q3 ICS update.
And yes, my thought's exactly, I'd expect heavy driver reuse from that update.
Related
Hello, I have an Atrix rooted with an unlocked bootloader, running Faux's Enhanced stock kernal. I was just wonder how I would upgrade when/if ICS comes to the Atrix. Would you SBF to 2.3.4 stock and OTA rom there, or is a Fruitcake option possible? I was just wondering, because I am determined not to brick this phone...hopefully ever.
When that moment comes, we all know what to do, don't worry.
Its still a while away for that, the source isn't even released yet.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Please stop creating these useless redundant threads, we already have a few ICS threads! Post in one of those!
WiredPirate said:
Please stop creating these useless redundant threads, we already have a few ICS threads! Post in one of those!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If i could "Thank" you 100x i would..
Sass86 said:
Its still a while away for that, the source isn't even released yet.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ummm, yes it is actually.
jgc121 said:
Ummm, yes it is actually.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no, the SDK was released. this doesn't equal the source for ICS.
the SDK for Honeycomb was released, but the source was never released. that's why we've never seen a honeycomb version of Cyanogenmod; as long as the SDK is all we have we won't be able to get a completely stable port of ICS out on any device
Alcapone263 said:
no, the SDK was released. this doesn't equal the source for ICS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
QFT
10char
Alcapone263 said:
no, the SDK was released. this doesn't equal the source for ICS.
the SDK for Honeycomb was released, but the source was never released. that's why we've never seen a honeycomb version of Cyanogenmod; as long as the SDK is all we have we won't be able to get a completely stable port of ICS out on any device
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're right, i mis-read - my bad
I just read this on Pulse... I know I've read that it may eventually come, but this looks like a good sign
http://androidcommunity.com/atts-ga...s-galaxy-note-and-skyrocket-are-next-20120327
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
No CM9 until there are drivers and all that released for the note. I know the Skyrocket is close, but until things are settled with that kind of stuff, they normally won't work on the device.
Looking forward to it though!
Talderon said:
No CM9 until there are drivers and all that released for the note. I know the Skyrocket is close, but until things are settled with that kind of stuff, they normally won't work on the device.
Looking forward to it though!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i thought qualcom already released the drivers for the note
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Only GPU drivers.
Eric-1987 said:
Only GPU drivers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i knew that lol dunno what I was thinking
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
kornklown69 said:
i thought qualcom already released the drivers for the note
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If they did, then we just need a CM Dev to step up and dev!!
I know that not all devices get a dev, that is why there are "KANG" versions out there. Individual Dev does the work from CM source, but is not officially supported by the CM team.
Only time will tell.
Seen this over on Android Police, and theres no mention of it here in our beloved LTEvo thread! Linaro is coming to CM9, and it sounds like very soon! Says to nearly double the speed on ICS. Heres the link:
http://www.androidpolice.com/2012/0...e-and-now-parts-of-it-are-being-added-to-cm9/
CAN NOT WAIT!
Wow....the interview was over and google's android was still running it's benchmark. Amazing stuff, can't wait till it's implemented into CM9. Thanks for this OP, it was a good read/video.
/drools for CM9+Linaro
JBQ said that they actually merged some of the Linaro code into Google's internal master branch. You know you've written good code when Google accepts it into AOSP.
From Google+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/100865424702789108139/posts/FkY3eiqeeq4
Jean-Baptiste Queru Yesterday 3:11 PM (edited) +8
We've already merged some of Linaro's changes into AOSP (and therefore into Google's internal master branch), a few weeks ago. Some more are pending review and look promising.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sounds pretty awesome, but I had never really planned on going back to AOSP... wonder if any of this would be able to be implemented into a Sense-based ROM? That would get me excited.
Zameus said:
Wow....the interview was over and google's android was still running it's benchmark. Amazing stuff, can't wait till it's implemented into CM9. Thanks for this OP, it was a good read/video.
/drools for CM9+Linaro
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought so too! - and, they make a button for that But I appreciate it just the same!
Traceamount said:
I thought so too! - and, they make a button for that But I appreciate it just the same!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was JUST about to hit that thanks button... until I saw this.
jk.
So does anybody know if an official CM9 build is coming to the LTEvo?
SPreston2001 said:
So does anybody know if an official CM9 build is coming to the LTEvo?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its seem this is as official as it gets.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1683384
Sent from my EVO 4G LTE
david279 said:
Its seem this is as official as it gets.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1683384
Sent from my EVO 4G LTE
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Beat me to it lol. Yea Kush is getting close it looks like. Once the data/sms are straightened out, I'll be all over it awaiting Linaro
from what I gathered watching that video, it seemed that we will not benefit from this....
Seemed the changes done were kernel level and geared to the specific SoC the Nexus runs...saying they were CPU optimizations, and that it mainly was cleaning the "bad code" allowed in -o2 optimization, and once cleaned they were able to run through o3 optimization...
correct me if im wrong in that thinking though...
still pretty cool!
.... http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1700919
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
david279 said:
Its seem this is as official as it gets.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1683384
Sent from my EVO 4G LTE
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How is it in any way official? It says unofficial right in the title.
nabbed said:
How is it in any way official? It says unofficial right in the title.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol where do you think they are building it from?
Sent from my Touchpad using xda premium
nabbed said:
How is it in any way official? It says unofficial right in the title.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"official as it gets"
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
Lmao. And Sgt that would suck if it is soc specific...
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
ckoadiyn said:
Lmao. And Sgt that would suck if it is soc specific...
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I mean im sure some of it is real general Android related stuff in the kernel that could be ported over to other SoC's....But the guy was fairly clear it was CPU related and delt with cleaning up the code to be able to do -o3 optimization on it...
deff need to read up on it more though...
Unofficial, I believe, means that it isn't supported by the CM team.
As i read the story its unofficial because its still being reviewed to be added to the tree.
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using XDA Premium HD app
sgt. slaughter said:
I mean im sure some of it is real general Android related stuff in the kernel that could be ported over to other SoC's....But the guy was fairly clear it was CPU related and delt with cleaning up the code to be able to do -o3 optimization on it...
deff need to read up on it more though...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well if its CPU stuff then manufacturers need to be doing the optimizing basically and google would have to change their code for the CPU as well. In order for this to happen......right?
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
nabbed said:
Unofficial, I believe, means that it isn't supported by the CM team.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Officially you are wrong, lol
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
When do you guys think when we will see this surface e?
Sent from my MB855 using xda app-developers app
HAHAHAHHH please get it correct. There is NO ICS 4.1. Android 4.1 is called Jelly Bean. Anyways until the source code is released (probably in 2 weeks), the CM team has nothing to work with and they only build from source. NO EXCEPTIONS.
Joker mentioned in his cm9 thread that he's working on porting Jelly. no eta.
Sent from my MB855 using Tapatalk 2
ericdabbs said:
HAHAHAHHH please get it correct. There is NO ICS 4.1. Android 4.1 is called Jelly Bean. Anyways until the source code is released (probably in 2 weeks), the CM team has nothing to work with and they only build from source. NO EXCEPTIONS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually there is no ICS source for Photon so technically CM9 is not built from source so that's not entirely true.
MikeyLee said:
Actually there is no ICS source for Photon so technically CM9 is not built from source so that's not entirely true.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He meant Google source not motorola Google didn't release the source yet
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
People should stop asking these questions... We will have fully working jb when we get 4.0 kernel and drivers and when joker has the time to implement them to the jb rom.
MikeyLee said:
Actually there is no ICS source for Photon so technically CM9 is not built from source so that's not entirely true.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes i meant Google source for Jelly Bean. I am aware that Motorola hasn't come out with the ICS source because the ICS upgrade hasn't even come out yet. It is still being developed for Q4.
Acvice said:
People should stop asking these questions....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe this was a valid question .
I just received my photon, coming from droid incredible 2. So far I feel that the since forums are more polite and have more devs with more courtesy .
Sent from my MB855 using xda app-developers app
hightech316 said:
I believe this was a valid question .
I just received my photon, coming from droid incredible 2. So far I feel that the since forums are more polite and have more devs with more courtesy .
Sent from my MB855 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see your point, but its the same as asking when were getting ics... I understand youre new to the photon forums, and welcome aboard. But when you see a new thread every couple days asking about the release date of ics (and now jb) for the past 8 or 9 months it gets agitating. Especially because if people would bother scanning through just the threads on page one they would quickly find the answer to this and many other commonly asked questions. I try to be as helpful and polite as i can, but just as its a rule of thumb to think before you speak, also should it be a rule of thumb to read before you post. I apologize if i offended you.
Sent from my CM9ed MoPho!
Acvice said:
its a rule of thumb to think before you speak, also should it be a rule of thumb to read before you post. I apologize if i offended you.
Sent from my CM9ed MoPho!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The dinc forums were constantly flooded , I agree with you I apologize if I came off rude.
I'll do my best to keep them clean and contribute when possible.
Maybe make this thread as a hub of 4.1 progression & updates ?
Digging new sunfire
Sent from my MB855 using xda app-developers app
I wouldn't mind checkin out JB. That notification bar is nice. I wanna try it out haha.
Sent from my CND'd MoPho
Your title is incorrect. No such thing. ICS is 4.0. JB is. 1. If I had to guess, NEVER! May her a hack, but official release, never. Hell, I have doubts on ICS!
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
dsims7_2000 said:
Your title is incorrect. No such thing. ICS is 4.0. JB is. 1. If I had to guess, NEVER! May her a hack, but official release, never. Hell, I have doubts on ICS!
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-57469087-94/google-releases-android-4.1-source-code/
Sent from my SGH-I777 using XDA
wow,
ill take time to read it.
so now were going to wait who's the next to release custom jelly?
:d
na7q said:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-57469087-94/google-releases-android-4.1-source-code/
Sent from my SGH-I777 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay joker, mangle that ****
Sent from my CM9ed MoPho!
Acvice said:
Okay joker, mangle that ****
Sent from my CM9ed MoPho!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't played with CM9 for a long time. How is the maturity of the ROM? Is it pretty stable or is it still kinda buggy. I remember the last time I used it, it had problems with viewing websites in landscape mode. Any outstanding problems with the ROM that should be fixed before jumping into Jelly Bean?
ericdabbs said:
I haven't played with CM9 for a long time. How is the maturity of the ROM? Is it pretty stable or is it still kinda buggy. I remember the last time I used it, it had problems with viewing websites in landscape mode. Any outstanding problems with the ROM that should be fixed before jumping into Jelly Bean?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's due to lack of drivers. It's otherwise pretty bug free. We just need some drivers to get it all working properly.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using XDA
ericdabbs said:
I haven't played with CM9 for a long time. How is the maturity of the ROM? Is it pretty stable or is it still kinda buggy. I remember the last time I used it, it had problems with viewing websites in landscape mode. Any outstanding problems with the ROM that should be fixed before jumping into Jelly Bean?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its nearly release candidate quality. I too left for a while but recently went back to it and am in love all over again . The rotation bug has been fixed in the most recent update but at a performance cost. Most are reporting that the performance decline is negligible though. Considering that it has taken many months for ics to mature to this point, i would imagine that it would take some time to get jb stable. We are getting ever closer to proprietary ics drivers and kernel though.
Sent from my CM9ed MoPho!
na7q said:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-57469087-94/google-releases-android-4.1-source-code/
Sent from my SGH-I777 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, but still no drivers for the Photon .......
---------- Post added at 01:46 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:44 PM ----------
Acvice said:
Its nearly release candidate quality. I too left for a while but recently went back to it and am in love all over again . The rotation bug has been fixed in the most recent update but at a performance cost. Most are reporting that the performance decline is negligible though. Considering that it has taken many months for ics to mature to this point, i would imagine that it would take some time to get jb stable. We are getting ever closer to proprietary ics drivers and kernel though.
Sent from my CM9ed MoPho!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
An ignorant but sincere question - how are we getting closer to Photon drivers?
willysp said:
Yeah, but still no drivers for the Photon .......
---------- Post added at 01:46 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:44 PM ----------
An ignorant but sincere question - how are we getting closer to Photon drivers?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I say that in the hopes that moto actually releases ics in october-december as promised.
Sent from my CM9ed MoPho!
Acvice said:
I say that in the hopes that moto actually releases ics in october-december as promised.
Sent from my CM9ed MoPho!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you - that's the answer I expected. Just wait for stock ICS......
willysp said:
Thank you - that's the answer I expected. Just wait for stock ICS......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock ics will permalock my bootloader so is worthless to me. We just need it to rip it apart.
Sent from my CM9ed MoPho!
Acvice said:
I say that in the hopes that moto actually releases ics in october-december as promised.
Sent from my CM9ed MoPho!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Never looks like it
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
LexLuger82 said:
Never looks like it
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortunately im inclined to agree with ya. Trying to look on the bright side though.
On a side note.. Why is it that we cant build an ics kernel from scratch? What exactly do they have that we need?
Sent from my CM9ed MoPho!
hmm
no photon?
Acvice said:
On a side note.. Why is it that we cant build an ics kernel from scratch? What exactly do they have that we need?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Support from nvidia. Tegra is so much different. If we would have omap processor, everything would be working now with faux, joker, turl, epsylon, and others.
peetr_ said:
Support from nvidia. Tegra is so much different. If we would have omap processor, everything would be working now with faux, joker, turl, epsylon, and others.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
****
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium