Related
Hi guys,
sorry if some might already answered this question, but i was unlucky with my search and im n00b to the Android system ( been use IOS for years)
my question is, what is the different for me with a SGS3? is it just a updated Android release?
currently im running with the XXALF2 version now and with that i can use all the SGS3 function, but what about IMM76I, does it have same function (smart call, smart stay and smart alert?) and what is the different ?
thanks in advance.
IMM76I is AOKP rom more custom rom and XXALF2 is orginal Samsung rom full whit blotware.But you haw XXALF2 custom made roms like Omega , Wanam and other.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Hmm people are loving empty spaces rather than bloatwares sorry softwares . And how misleading it would be introduce those words to new users ?
《tapatalked from galaxy s3》
thanks for the quick reply.
so with the AOKP i dont have the same function as the samsung custom rom, if i decide to flash IMM76I ?
when you say bloatware you mean software reporting status to samsung ?
nic0dk said:
thanks for the quick reply.
so with the AOKP i dont have the same function as the samsung custom rom, if i decide to flash IMM76I ?
when you say bloatware you mean software reporting status to samsung ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Aosp roms will miss ssome features of Samsung rom . Like you won't have smart stay, pop up play, etc etc. Aosp is meant for pure Google experience like galaxy nexus. Yeah people call additional software's from Samsung as bloatwares
《tapatalked from galaxy s3》
Thanks mate. I'm better understand it now, what about kernels, does it have anything to do with these release?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using XDA
nic0dk said:
Thanks mate. I'm better understand it now, what about kernels, does it have anything to do with these release?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it depends on the kernel, some kernels only support samsung roms and some kernels support both samsung and aosp.
as of now it is safe to use aosp roms with thier own kernels, in a few days of time custom kernels like siyah will support both aosp and samsung roms.
bala_gamer said:
as of now it is safe to use aosp roms with thier own kernels, in a few days of time custom kernels like siyah will support both aosp and samsung roms.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Siya already does.
OP,
I would suggest staying with the samsung based roms for now. You're new to samsung android. Get used to the features and how you can use your phone.
I always used AOSP Roms (Android open source project) to replace my HTC roms but I knew what functionality I was missing.
I too am new to Samsung and finding lots of cool features that are samsung only.
There is no way I will be going to AOSP yet. And this is from someone who developed AOSP for HTC devices, so obviously I am a big fan of AOSP.
Im just saying, theres a lot of benefit from samsung roms so work out what they are before trying aosp then you will see what (if anything) is missing for you.
rootSU said:
Siya already does.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah it does, but not recommended for new users with aosp as of now. would suggest the OP with stock roms for some months atleast..
alright, i agree - the features in the stock rom are awesome and i wont miss that by any chance, the problem with me is that im love to custom everything instead of standard and sometimes it have its backfire effect
the Omega seems to still have all the feature and i would maybe stick to that one for now.
about the AOSP, do you believe there will come a release that support all the currently feature SGS3 have in the future ?
cheers and thanks
bala_gamer said:
yeah it does, but not recommended for new users with aosp as of now. would suggest the OP with stock roms for some months atleast..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what does OP mean ?
nic0dk said:
what does OP mean ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its not hard to guess... its the Original Poster and thats you
nic0dk said:
about the AOSP, do you believe there will come a release that support all the currently feature SGS3 have in the future ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very doubtful. Usually none of teh features can be ported. Sometimes a couple of the basic ones can be.
thanks guys, im learn alot today, things starting to make sens
Hi guys,
I'm new in the Samsung scene, I've Always used HTC phones before. My question is not how to flash (i'll first search for it myself), but if anyone could recommend me a rom with the look and feel of the SGS3 software.
I've searched but couldn't find anything i think works 99%.
thx
killerbie said:
Hi guys,
I'm new in the Samsung scene, I've Always used HTC phones before. My question is not how to flash (i'll first search for it myself), but if anyone could recommend me a rom with the look and feel of the SGS3 software.
I've searched but couldn't find anything i think works 99%.
thx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try Resurrection remix 2.6.1. Based on ICS and stable as a rock. I'm pretty new myself and been using it for a while.Easy to install and no issues whatsoever. :good:
First of all, are you sure you have an i9100 and not an i9100G, a skyrocket (AT&T or Rogers), a Galaxy S2 LTE HD, etc?
If you do have an i9100, this is the forum for you. If not, try and find your right forum...
I'd look in the SGS2 android dev forums and not the Original Android Dev forums. Alot of cooks have ROMs with SGS3-like themes... And there's possibly a touchwiz5 mod in the themes section. I know the ripple lockscreen was ported too...
To be honest, alot of ROMs exist but it's a question of taste... I know Resurrection remix is a popular one. Alot of people switched to Cyanogenmod when ICS hit though, as ICS wasn't up to par for Samsung's implementation...
Your best bet is to flash a custom kernel with CWM recovery in Odin (Alot of guides to do this) like CF-Root and then grab ROMs and flash them through CWM. If you want a kernel that's able to dual boot, you can use DreamKernel, Siyah, etc. That way you can get one ROM going and test a second ROM as a secondary. Dual booting can be achieved because we have a 500MB partition on our phones that isn't used for anything... Fun, is it not?
And The other rom is pfittech ics rom and is also stable and he is working on stable jb rom as among other devs
mad-monk said:
And The other rom is pfittech ics rom and is also stable and he is working on stable jb rom as among other devs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ditto for rootbox.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
RR or RB
wow guys really thanks!!! I'm really happy to get so much information! I can do everything myself now thank you a lot :')
I think i'll wait untill a port of the new JB update for the S3 gets ported
I've always used Slim ICS, very light weight and customizable.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
killerbie said:
wow guys really thanks!!! I'm really happy to get so much information! I can do everything myself now thank you a lot :')
I think i'll wait untill a port of the new JB update for the S3 gets ported
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There allready trying to port the ics sgs3 rom to the sgs2 but that is a bit stuck coz of kernel base and file being over 500mb...maybe there in better luck with a jb kernel and jb Os
-Grift- said:
RR or RB
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed i'm a big resurrection remix fan, the dev updates his rom uber frequently, more than most others. Respect!!
gr8ednz said:
Agreed i'm a big resurrection remix fan, the dev updates his rom uber frequently, more than most others. Respect!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd go with rootbox. Just because the dev updates more frequently does not mean it's a better rom. The ones who don't update frequently just mean they don't have bugs to fix...
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Hi everyone!
Is the latest build (06.07) of the below given Rom based on JB or ICS?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1710679
I searched a lot but couldnt confirm exactly.
Thanks!
xy12344321 said:
Hi everyone!
Is the latest build (06.07) of the below given Rom based on JB or ICS?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1710679
I searched a lot but couldnt confirm exactly.
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I take it you didn't see any of the screenshots in post 1?
xy12344321 said:
Hi everyone!
Is the latest build (06.07) of the below given Rom based on JB or ICS?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1710679
I searched a lot but couldnt confirm exactly.
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
first try to go thro the OP of the same thread ma8
u can make out from those screen shots whether its ICS or JB for sure
as posted by other you can see it by the screenshots however aokp build 40 is an ics version mate
It clearly shows you in the screens that its ICS. (Android 4.0.4).
JB = Android 4.1
How can I add the kill process function to long back press ??
please don't tell me to use any rom. I want to add it to my rom.
anybody ??!
is that a hard thing to ask ?
I searched for a similiar thread. there isn't any.
If you want an useful reply, give useful info (ROM, Android version...)
antonio1475 said:
If you want an useful reply, give useful info (ROM, Android version...)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry I didn't know about that.
it's ICS 4.0.4, base: XWLPX and it's alliance V4 rom
Then I'd say no. There is JKay deluxe mod which I've read includes back to kill feature, but there is no version of the mod for XWLPX
antonio1475 said:
Then I'd say no. There is JKay deluxe mod which I've read includes back to kill feature, but there is no version of the mod for XWLPX
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but the kill process does exist for XWLPX
it's in simplistic V rom. it's also based on XWLPX
khaled_7 said:
but the kill process does exist for XWLPX
it's in simplistic V rom. it's also based on XWLPX
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you are saying that Samsung XWLPX has the option to enable back to kill, but Simplistic V ROM doesn't? So ask the Simplistic V ROM developer to make it available, no?
antonio1475 said:
So you are saying that Samsung XWLPX has the option to enable back to kill, but Simplistic V ROM doesn't? So ask the Simplistic V ROM developer to make it available, no?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the simplistic HAS IT !!
NOT ORIGINAL SAMSUNG !
simplistic is based on XWLPX
I tried to ask him but seems he doesn't come online so much
khaled_7 said:
the simplistic HAS IT !!
NOT ORIGINAL SAMSUNG !
simplistic is based on XWLPX
I tried to ask him but seems he doesn't come online so much
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL I confused Alliance with Simplistic (I thought they were the same). I don't use tht kind of ROMs so I don't know their names. Excuse me on that.
You should ask in the ROM thread. I don't see a way you can add the feature yourself... Good luck
antonio1475 said:
LOL I confused Alliance with Simplistic (I thought they were the same). I don't use tht kind of ROMs so I don't know their names. Excuse me on that.
You should ask in the ROM thread. I don't see a way you can add the feature yourself... Good luck
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no problem.
What roms do you use then ? dont say AOkp or cyanogen please
khaled_7 said:
no problem.
What roms do you use then ? dont say AOkp or cyanogen please
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then I'll say nothing
antonio1475 said:
Then I'll say nothing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont even know why they waste their time in this project.
they are so buggy plus the lack som samsung features AND official jelly bean is so close.
khaled_7 said:
I dont even know why they waste their time in this project.
they are so buggy plus the lack som samsung features AND official jelly bean is so close.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL you don't even know the purpose of developing and the work and innovation they do. They miss some Samsung propietary features, but they have lots of more (depending on the person) useful features AND it goes months ahead official updates (on i9100 the difference will be a few months, in some devices will be longer, and in some devices Cyanogen is the only update they will see).
Think before saying so many foolishness in so few words. I'm done here bye
antonio1475 said:
LOL you don't even know the purpose of developing and the work and innovation they do. They miss some Samsung propietary features, but they have lots of more (depending on the person) useful features AND it goes months ahead official updates (on i9100 the difference will be a few months, in some devices will be longer, and in some devices Cyanogen is the only update they will see).
Think before saying so many foolishness in so few words. I'm done here bye
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not talking about other devices -___-
the innovation things you talk about will make many think twice before using them and lose battery life, stability & many things I don't remember.
Hi mates, My S3 is over a year old now and the TW redraw issue is still here. So I decided to use a custom Rom. I tried to research CyanogenMod ROM and I'm little confused. Could someone please answer my questions below?
1. Version 10.1 is Jellybean 4.2 and 10 is 4.1?
2. I can see version 10.1 with "nightly" build thread. Does this means that this is not a stable build yet?
3. What is the stable version for I9300 Galaxy S3?
4. I know that this is the most popular CustomRom and the devs are doing this for free and it's unfair to ask this question. But how can we make sure that this rom doesn't have anything that can steal our private info? Like Keyloggers, malwares, etc?
5. Could you please provide me a link of the best way to install this rom?
TIA
Hi there fellow,
1. Yes.
2. Yes.
3. See 2
4.Well I guess you'll just need to trust the dev like all of us doing.
Same as for stock roms they can also potentially retrieve your info. Maybe you'll find this useful for you:
https://plus.google.com/100275307499530023476/posts/iLrvqH8tbce
5. Just visit the development and original development sections and look for the AOSP ones.
Cheers
Thanks mate, but number 3 is quite confusing, 10.1 is not stable right?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Try the CM discussion thread .
jje
wicked1683 said:
Thanks mate, but number 3 is quite confusing, 10.1 is not stable right?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And cm10.1 is not yet stable
Convey your thanks using the thanks button rather than posting it in words.
wicked1683 said:
Hi mates, My S3 is over a year old now and the TW redraw issue is still here. So I decided to use a custom Rom. I tried to research CyanogenMod ROM and I'm little confused. Could someone please answer my questions below?
1. Version 10.1 is Jellybean 4.2 and 10 is 4.1?
2. I can see version 10.1 with "nightly" build thread. Does this means that this is not a stable build yet?
3. What is the stable version for I9300 Galaxy S3?
4. I know that this is the most popular CustomRom and the devs are doing this for free and it's unfair to ask this question. But how can we make sure that this rom doesn't have anything that can steal our private info? Like Keyloggers, malwares, etc?
5. Could you please provide me a link of the best way to install this rom?
TIA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Visit this link and look out for your device
Hope this helped you