Best wallpaper for battery life? - Galaxy S III Q&A, (US Carriers)

Ignoring live wallpapers, is there a good "blank" wallpaper that would minimize battery usage? all white? all black? My phone is a tool, I don't really care about fancy backgrounds, and I saw something on cnet about certain wallpapers causing greater battery drain based on the screen technology. (Obviously live wallpapers would).

Black or dark ones
Sent from my SGH-T959 using Tapatalk 2

Yeah just get a totally black wallpaper, that would be best. CM9 and 10 even have a "no wallpaper" thing built in for totally black. that would use the least. Though as the poster above said, preferably ones that are darker tend to use less battery life.

I've been using android since I've had my HTC dream/g1. And back then things would help with battery life. I've played with sync on, sync off, brightness on low, wallpapers, dark themes, etc etc you get the point.
At this point in my android "career" I have come to the conclusion that if i keep sync on, Bluetooth on, have whatever i want for a background and the battery life will always be the same.
If you want good battery life buy an extended battery, or don't use your phone. With eveyything on except wifi(I don't have it) I only drop a bit over half a percent every hour. That's on my sgs3. The next step is rooting and running different kernels which can make a difference.
Sent from my SGH-I747M using Tapatalk 2

Related

Do you use live wallpapers?

This poll is to see how many people actually use a live wallpaper.
Not really, they look nice but I get better battery life without.
Sent from my Droid using XDA App
No. I just haven't found one that I love.
Powered by Axura with a dash of Voodoo
i get bored with them too quickly. plus i think i get bettery battery results without it
Sent from beyond the Galaxy
for the most part... no.
i mean i use them from time to time maybe for a day or two. but i always find myself going back to normal wallpapers.. unless im showing off then i'd be like check this out lol
I've used microbes for a month. It looks good with gingerbread themed beautiful widgets. Also my battery lasts from 630 to 9.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
I usually keep an empty (black) wallpaper. But that's just me
I used one from time to time until I found Solar Winds and I have been using it since (about 2 weeks) I have not seen any adverse effects on battery life. I still get 20-25 hours.
Lethal_NFS said:
This poll is to see how many people actually use a live wallpaper.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use them.
Sent using Tapatalk...
Vibrant w/ Nero v4.1 + Voodoo = Beastmode
I use them, I usually have the Nexus S live wallpaper, but just switched over to the Solar Winds one. I have a hard time using a stationary wallpaper now, I sigh when I see my boring desktop wallpaper!
Nope. It's nice to show off your Android phone Live Wallpaper to your friends, but for practical use, I would still just use a static wallpaper.
I think this poll should have more options because I barely use Live Walls but from time to time I do and keep it for a while.
I voted No but only because its only every so often that I do.
I use Live Wallpaper on my Samsung Vibrant its called Solar Winds its so cool!!!
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Sometimes, but mostly I just keep a static one.
I mean, they look nice and all, but they drain your battery faster.
I used 8-bit waterfall for a while (recommended for game nerds) but it was harshing my battery. Then I used solar wind for a while but I just got over looking at moving **** all the time.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Yes. I'm using Original Flurry. Goes good with my black theme (Obsidian v5 beta).
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
I use microbes and the swirling galaxy. I bought the phone to use it, f all about batterylife, im where it can be charged usually and have the spare battery pack. I have no idea what battery life will be with a static wallpaper. My phone works great with nero, I was about to give up on it until I started putting roms on it
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S - powered by Team Whiskeyâ„¢
I too use a live wallpaper. I find my self partial to the nexus and nexus s style wallpapers so I use this one called pl3x highly customizable to the point where I experience little to no additional battery drain. On an average day I still get 16-20 hours worth of battery (50-100 txts, ~40MB web usage, no gps, no wifi, occasional tethering)
mikecbr97 said:
Not really, they look nice but I get better battery life without.
Sent from my Droid using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 i do like the live wall paper especially the microbes but it drains the battery more than normal wall papers
deeoh1084 said:
+1 i do like the live wall paper especially the microbes but it drains the battery more than normal wall papers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Poorly made live wallpapers have poor battery life. Well made live wallpapers like solar winds, however, have virtually no effect on battery life at all.

Live Wallpaper

Just a quick question, how do you guys feel about live wallpapers?
Too much of a battery drain? Ruins performance? Anyone use them?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
I don't use them, I think they slightly impact battery life.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
They are pretty, and in some cases they are even useful... but they certainly impact battery life.
They impact battery life, but the screen is so much better to look at. I personally use the nexus live wallpaper. I get through the day with about 30% battery left on moderate use so no biggie.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
This is hilarious, I just installed the free matrix one to see how cool it looked. Setcpu bounced back and forth from 200-800, with a normal picture wallpaper it sits at 200 at idle. lol I used to use beautiful live weather(or whatever it's called) and loved that because it showed the current weather for my area in the wallpaper...so cool. That was always my favorite by far.
its my understanding that they only use more battery when being displayed, and stay idle when not displayed, correct?
I use Ice Galaxy wallpaper and get around 12-15 hours with moderate to heavy usage.
i could be wrong here but it almost seems like they use more battery regardless of whether the screen is on or not. anyone have any input on this?

Official Battery Savings Thread*

OK here is the official SGS2 I777 Battery saving thread. I don't mean to be a culprit and post "another battery saving thread", but I am. So get over it. This thread is meant to maintain the battery savings threads, all in one place. INCLUDING: Battery savings tips, philosophies, and other methods of efficiently managing the charge that your battery witholds. Since I searched through basically all of the 17 pages in both the I777 and regular SG2 to collect all this. NOTE: THIS THREAD IS NOT MEANT TO ADDRESS BATTERY DRAIN PROBLEMS OR ANYTHING OF THE LIKE. DO NOT POST YOUR PROBLEMS HERE. This is simply a collection of what I found to be the most essential threads and information regarding efficient use of battery charge and battery savings. I'll update this every few months, or as I see fit. I don't see things changing much since the way a battery works, and our android os will be relatively similar over the years.
I realize that people looking for this information could just go through all the threads like any other xda troll would be the first to point out, but I also recognize the noob community for this phone (I was once there myself) and would like to be helpful in providing it all in one place to prevent others from wasting their time, whether deserving or not
BATTERY SAVING THREADS:
*Basically what I did here is I just weeded out all the crap and gave you the threads that are actually of use*
Here is your basic, comprehensive Battery Saving thread:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1234264
(It contains many simple changes that are obvious to some, including lower brightness, turning off animations, and then more complex changes such as under volting and fast dormancy)
More general tips plus freezing apps and undervolting:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1335864&highlight=battery
More general tips: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1443603&highlight=battery+life
THE TWO THINGS THAT KILL YOUR BATTERY THE MOST:
Super AMOLED Screen: Now it's all apparent to us at this point that android screens (S-amoled's) kill very large amounts of battery. You will save copious amounts of battery if you do not use your screen as much, hence why half of the people posting their battery stats have screen on like once an hour for half a second. They basically don't use their phones.
Data/Radio: Ever notice that when you put your phone on airplane mode before you go to bed, when you wake up it's only gone down by about 1%? That's because you're not getting any service, and have no data coming in. Believe it or not, the phones hardware is pretty efficient. CPU's don't use very much idle power at all, and I expect that to stay the same, even with quad-core processors coming out. It's mostly the over air things (and screen ) that kill our battery. Data itself uses a **** ton of battery. On a daily basis (And I've tried just about all the roms; CM7,CM9, MIUI (GB and ICS), SammyTW ones, etc.) I use a considerable amount of data. I try to have my data on most of the day since I get facebook notifiations and send/receive MMS's, but on the days where I have it off for a couple hours I start to notice, damn, my battery is still pretty high
EDIT: Using Edge/2G saves a lot of battery if you're someone who needs data on most of the day. I recently switched to instead of intermitedly turning data on and off, just having Edge on all day (for notifications) and then switching to 3G when I needed to browse or use maps, etc. Idle usage of Edge vs. 3G is probably around 40% less battery consumption (my opinion), it works really well for me.
PHILOSOPHIES:
If you want to compare your own battery life with others to get a better idea about things, check out this thread:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1498303&highlight=undervolt
Juice Defender + others: I am a fan of this application. I used to use it for the first couple months I had the phone and it made a significant difference (mostly because of data deactivation). It makes 20-35% difference in savings from having not micro-managed anything yourself to then using the app. There are other variations of JD, GreenPower, Battery Booster, etc.
If you want more information about Undervolting, or the process, please check out:
http://checkrom.com/threads/more-ba...ry-before-posting-about-bad-battery-life.542/
Fast Dormancy effects the trafficway in which your data makes it to your phone, both effecting the speed at which is arrives, and the battery it consumes while doing so. Check out this thread:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1111581&highlight=fast+dormancy
Underclocking and Overclocking: These are ways of tweaking your CPU usage. Underclocking is known for when you limit the maximum frequency, your CPU can clock to. So in laymans terms, what that transaltes to is your 1.2 GHz (1200 MHz) processor, can be changed to a 0.8 GHz (800 MHz) processor, if you were to underclock it to 800 Mhz. This is helpful to some almost completely dependant on your usage.
More elaborate, drawn out explanation: While your phone is idling, or sitting with the screen off, it is sitting at 200 MHz (lowest default - if you go lower than that your phone can become unstable [screen not turn on, etc.]), so underclocking won't help you improve battery usage much if you just keep your phone off most of the day. Undervolting would help more with that. if you however, find that you play lots of games, or mindless swipe across homescreens all day confused, or perhaps photo editing apps, or other things that use the maximum cpu frequency; then you will find that having your phone underclocked to 800 MHz, forces your cpu to work less during those heavy maintence situations, but in turn, prevents heavy battery drain. What this translates to in daily use: If you play angry birds, your phone's cpu might be jumping up to 1200 MHz (depends on your kernel settings - usually it's set to ondemand, in which case it will do so) during those swipes when the bird flys across the screen. However, that is not a very cpu intensive action, so if you were underclocked to 800 MHz, you probably wouldn't see any difference (lag, stutters) in your game play. However, if you were playing a 3D defense game, or esentially any other 3D game which requires you to scroll around the map, or has many many things on the screen at once (beyond fruit ninja and angry birds), then you would notice a difference in performance due to underclocking. I mention all of this because underclocking will be most effective during those situations, but it can also be the most hindering, in those same situations. All depends on how you're using your phone and what you're trying to achieve, while maintaining a certain level of quality.
Overclocking works the opposite, if you are trying to reach a certain level of performance (you just downloaded a new 3D MMO dungeon defense game and your phone is jittering and laggy during gameplay), beyond your default 200-1200 MHz clocked cpu, you may overclock up to 1600 MHz (some devs don't like you doing it - because it is essentially quite harmful for your cpu if used for a longer period of time), also depending on the kernel (again, devs created them) you may not be able to overclock, but on the majority you can.
To Underclock you will need an app called SetCpu (or equivalent) in order to change your over-underclock rate, as well as the scaling of your kernel (ondemand, performance [max frequency, all the time], conservative, etc.), also some roms have clocking options built in (such as AOKP).
For information regarding Underclocking check out: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1238580&highlight=underclock
If you're just straight up looking for a better battery saving rom, look here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1439179&highlight=battery
If you want to know more about Android OS, and how it goes about consuming battery, check out this thread:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1290020
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last but not least, if you do most or all of these methods but you're still not happy? You can always turn your phone off, I heard that saves a lot of battery
If you care, leave thanks at the bottom. If not that's cool. I'm not into the whole publicity thing, I just like helping.
First, juice defender does not help at all and btw s amoleds save battery vs lcds
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
Very useful compilation of battery related threads. Good job VanillaCracker <claps>
Super AMOLED Screen: Now it's all apparent to us at this point that android screens (S-amoled's) kill very large amounts of battery. You will save copious amounts of battery if you do not use your screen as much, hence why half of the people posting their battery stats have screen on like once an hour for half a second. They basically don't use their phones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AMOLEDs are supposed to be more energy efficient than LCDs I thought. That being said, I think one problem might be that many users of the former tend to keep their screens very bright because they are such a beauty to look at. I get what I think is good battery life by adjusting the brightness of my screen down when on battery only and by fine-tuning auto brightness settings.
One of the nice things about the S-AMOLED screen is that when it shows blacks, it's not using pixels. Pixels are actually turned off for the blacks. You can get further battery saving by using darker themes and inverted apps. Of course, that's not to everyone's liking. Me, I tend to like darker, tending towards minimalist screens as opposed to bright, busy ones, so it's a win for me.
Nick281051 said:
First, juice defender does not help at all and btw s amoleds save battery vs lcds
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First, in reading my paragraph I was speaking of JD's helpfulness in relation to not micro-managing (turning off data, etc.) anything yourself. In this case JD helps a lot....
Second, I didn't bash any part of our AMOLED screens, but they use a lot of battery...idk anything about how they compare to other screens, and idc...that has nothing to do with my post. We all have I777's, and that's the way it is, so I'm not too concerned of other screens.
I will say, that in light of reading most of your comments (which are found everywhere) , evidently, that you do at least make a good point, most of the time.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using XDA
Yes data drains battery. If you are rooted (I hope you are since you are reading this on xda), you should get Droidwall. It's a firewall for your phone which limits certain apps to use network data, wifi data, or neither. Useful if you are also a little bit paranoid :silly:.
Another amazing app I also use is called llama. It is similar to tasker but it's free. This app allows me to set profiles and actions based on location (antenna mast instead of GPS to save battery) and other triggers. Not sure how ICS manages BT and Wifi scanning but those things use to drain my battery under GB so I got into a habit of toggling them on/off. Llama can do it automatically for me because I am lazy or sometimes I forget to.
I think any phone screen can be a big battery drainer if left on long and are set really bright. I have a habit of hitting the power button after I am done using it as opposed to just letting it shut off by itself.
xhepera said:
AMOLEDs are supposed to be more energy efficient than LCDs I thought. That being said, I think one problem might be that many users of the former tend to keep their screens very bright because they are such a beauty to look at. I get what I think is good battery life by adjusting the brightness of my screen down when on battery only and by fine-tuning auto brightness settings.
One of the nice things about the S-AMOLED screen is that when it shows blacks, it's not using pixels. Pixels are actually turned off for the blacks. You can get further battery saving by using darker themes and inverted apps. Of course, that's not to everyone's liking. Me, I tend to like darker, tending towards minimalist screens as opposed to bright, busy ones, so it's a win for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They are more efficient than LCD's, and I made no notion to say they weren't. I simply said that they were one of the two main culprits of battery drain. I'm not saying our phones suck cus they have AMOLED screens, it's actually awesome. I'm just saying, like any other phone, having the screen on lot is going to kill your battery.
Yeah on stock (rooted after a month) I used to use auto-brightness most of the time, and sammy's auto seems a little brighter than necessary by default (so I'd keep it on 40% some days). But after switching around to different rooms (before I started tweaking auto-brightness) having brightness at what I'd actually consider an adequate level, versus a little bit brighter makes a huge difference. When the screen looks just a little too dull in all situations it really takes away from the experience hah
Also, I know black pixels are technically off on AMOLEDS, but I've noticed on many occasion when using in a room with no light on at night (pitch black, essentially) that when rebooting and hitting the yellow triangle screen (mostly black) you can see the black area of the screen. It's not completely black. It's definitely a very real looking black, but it still looks like there's a backlight behind the screen. Is that the case? Can anyone confirm?
Sent from my SGH-I777 using XDA
. . .idk anything about how they compare to other screens, and idc...that has nothing to do with my post.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
While it may not have anything to do with your post, per se, I think it's a good idea for people to be educated about our screens since many *are* coming from the LCD world and some of the rules they're used to don't apply. And some of those rules very definitely have an effect on battery life, like the rendering of blacks that I mentioned above.
VanillaCracker said:
They are more efficient than LCD's, and I made no notion to say they weren't. I simply said that they were one of the two main culprits of battery drain. I'm not saying our phones suck cus they have AMOLED screens, it's actually awesome. I'm just saying, like any other phone, having the screen on lot is going to kill your battery.
Yeah on stock (rooted after a month) I used to use auto-brightness most of the time, and sammy's auto seems a little brighter than necessary by default (so I'd keep it on 40% some days). But after switching around to different rooms (before I started tweaking auto-brightness) having brightness at what I'd actually consider an adequate level, versus a little bit brighter makes a huge difference. When the screen looks just a little too dull in all situations it really takes away from the experience hah
Also, I know black pixels are technically off on AMOLEDS, but I've noticed on many occasion when using in a room with no light on at night (pitch black, essentially) that when rebooting and hitting the yellow triangle screen (mostly black) you can see the black area of the screen. It's not completely black. It's definitely a very real looking black, but it still looks like there's a backlight behind the screen. Is that the case? Can anyone confirm?
Sent from my SGH-I777 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is the case with LED screens. In a mostly black scene, the individual pixels for the black area are not lit, however there is still a backlight lighting the screen itself which you may see bleed through. This is of course assuming the phone LED works at least somewhat similarly to a TV.
xhepera said:
While it may not have anything to do with your post, per se, I think it's a good idea for people to be educated about our screens since many *are* coming from the LCD world and some of the rules they're used to don't apply. And some of those rules very definitely have an effect on battery life, like the rendering of blacks that I mentioned above.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I agree with you on that. It is more the manner of criticism which he spoke it that I am not favorable of, not necessarily the information which he shared. Which is why I wrote what I did at the end of my comment.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using XDA
Ahem....let me try to get his thread back on track.
I agree wih your comments vanillacracker. On a gb rom if I disable auto sync it helps me a lot wih battery life because he signal is really awful at my work. So I guess if the signal is bad it tries to sync amd keeps doing it for a long time whih really drains the battery. Disabling background data helps even more but I like to get my emails so I do not.
Sammy based roms are the best wih auto brightness quickness. Aosp roms are always slow to react. I hate when I step outside and the screen takes for ever to adjust. But the sammy based roms also have high default brightness as you mentioned.
Ps: do not feed the trolls. Just report them.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda app-developers app
Tophaholic said:
Ahem....let me try to get his thread back on track.
I agree wih your comments vanillacracker. On a gb rom if I disable auto sync it helps me a lot wih battery life because he signal is really awful at my work. So I guess if the signal is bad it tries to sync amd keeps doing it for a long time whih really drains the battery. Disabling background data helps even more but I like to get my emails so I do not.
Sammy based roms are the best wih auto brightness quickness. Aosp roms are always slow to react. I hate when I step outside and the screen takes for ever to adjust. But the sammy based roms also have high default brightness as you mentioned.
Ps: do not feed the trolls. Just report them.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will agree with you on most of your points and yes you are correct about the signal, the worse your signal is the more it affects the battery. Also, tasks aokp has the option now to change the reaction speed so if you like aosp but hate the reaction speed that is an option.
How exactly was I trolling? I know you're referring to me, I made a criticism of two points out of the entire thing and he tells me I'm a troll and that I need to take an anti depressant. What exactly did I do wrong?
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
Amobius said:
That is the case with LED screens. In a mostly black scene, the individual pixels for the black area are not lit, however there is still a backlight lighting the screen itself which you may see bleed through. This is of course assuming the phone LED works at least somewhat similarly to a TV.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ohh alright that makes a lot of sense then. Thanks a lot, that was really helpful for me! Yeah cus in the completely black screen sometimes I can see the little splotches that look like it's where the backlight is squished against the screen or something. I noticed the marks are in a different spot on my current I777 than they were on my old one (replaced cus power button stopped working). Yeah it would make sense that AMOLED's came around the same time LED's started getting more popular in TVs too (few years ago), pretty baller technology for a phone! I'm loving it haha
Nick281051 said:
Way to come back with a personal attack, it's been proven in many cases that JD does not help and if anything hurts battery life. I used to use it and now I don't with no hit on battery. I'm not depressed thank you very much. I reported you for that one. I wasn't saying anything bad or personal but you had to go ahead and do it.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I disagree with you that Juice defender does not improve battery life. I am aware that obviously running an app in the background (Juice defender in this case) uses battery. But if the app is disabling your data (data uses battery..more than the juice defender app uses) then it's not possible for it to not increase battery.....just logic there. Anyway I'm sure there's been reports that say it does and does not increase battery, it's been obvious to me that it does, and it's logical to assume it does (if you know what I'm addressing) too. So I'll say to each their own. I do not wish to argue about things anymore, I will not edit my thread to your liking, you may simply dismiss that tip if you'd like.
I do not care about a report, I'm sure most people see the way I act and understand my reasoning. I probably overreacted a bit to your initial response , I've edited my accords. :cyclops:
BTW, VC, thanks for the compilation. Hopefully it will prove useful to folks!
VanillaCracker said:
I disagree with you that Juice defender does not improve battery life. I am aware that obviously running an app in the background (Juice defender in this case) uses battery. But if the app is disabling your data (data uses battery..more than the juice defender app uses) then it's not possible for it to not increase battery.....just logic there. Anyway I'm sure there's been reports that say it does and does not increase battery, it's been obvious to me that it does, and it's logical to assume it does (if you know what I'm addressing) too. So I'll say to each their own. I do not wish to argue about things anymore, I will not edit my thread to your liking, you may simply dismiss that tip if you'd like.
I do not care about a report, I'm sure most people see the way I act and understand my reasoning. I probably overreacted a bit to your initial response , I've edited my accords. :cyclops:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for being mature about it, that makes me infinitely less mad And i respect you for thay, ill edit mine as well
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
Nick281051 said:
I will agree with you on most of your points and yes you are correct about the signal, the worse your signal is the more it affects the battery. Also, tasks aokp has the option now to change the reaction speed so if you like aosp but hate the reaction speed that is an option.
How exactly was I trolling? I know you're referring to me, I made a criticism of two points out of the entire thing and he tells me I'm a troll and that I need to take an anti depressant. What exactly did I do wrong?
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude.....no offense but your first post was pretty disrespectful....hence my comment. However your quoted post was very useful. I believe in one thing...you give respect you get respect.
Now...getting back to the topic....good point about tasks rom....I did try it out but frankly speaking it is still not at par with sammy base roms wih regards to auto brightness. It does rock otherwise.
I am currently on ktoonsezs MIUI port (love that guy. No homo)....and m pretty happy with the auto brightness
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda app-developers app
Tophaholic said:
Dude.....no offense but your first post was pretty disrespectful....hence my comment. However your quoted post was very useful. I believe in one thing...you give respect you get respect.
Now...getting back to the topic....good point about tasks rom....I did try it out but frankly speaking it is still not at par with sammy base roms wih regards to auto brightness. It does rock otherwise.
I am currently on ktoonsezs MIUI port (love that guy. No homo)....and m pretty happy with the auto brightness
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes now that I think about it I did come off douchey, and I apologize to the op for that
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
Tophaholic said:
Dude.....no offense but your first post was pretty disrespectful....hence my comment. However your quoted post was very useful. I believe in one thing...you give respect you get respect.
Now...getting back to the topic....good point about tasks rom....I did try it out but frankly speaking it is still not at par with sammy base roms wih regards to auto brightness. It does rock otherwise.
I am currently on ktoonsezs MIUI port (love that guy. No homo)....and m pretty happy with the auto brightness
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If the only thing which is holding you from using aokp is the auto brightness, there is a flashable zip in the fluxxi thread which gives great settings.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda app-developers app
Amobius said:
That is the case with LED screens. In a mostly black scene, the individual pixels for the black area are not lit, however there is still a backlight lighting the screen itself which you may see bleed through. This is of course assuming the phone LED works at least somewhat similarly to a TV.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OLED screens do not have a backlight. That is one of the things that make them much more power efficient than LCD. The pixels themselves in an OLED display generate light.

[Q] GB vs JB Battery Usage?

Is there a real difference? I thought I read somewhere that somebody got optimal battery life and performance by running GB over JB.
Is this true?
I believe it. Newer versions of Android have cool new stuff. Unfortunately cool new stuff runs in the background. So an older version of Android may have less stuff running in the background.
However we have some pretty cool devs that can cook up some smooth roms and may increase battery life.
I myself think it all depends on the user. How many apps or tasks running depends on you. Also using dark or black themes can greatly help improve battery life. The screen on my phone with a solid white picture can be on for 4 hours. Where it can stay on for 8 hours displaying a black picture. Also cell signal matters. A slow weak signal drains faster. Being on Wi-Fi helps.
There's just Soooo many factors to consider!!
440bro said:
I believe it. Newer versions of Android have cool new stuff. Unfortunately cool new stuff runs in the background. So an older version of Android may have less stuff running in the background.
However we have some pretty cool devs that can cook up some smooth roms and may increase battery life.
I myself think it all depends on the user. How many apps or tasks running depends on you. Also using dark or black themes can greatly help improve battery life. The screen on my phone with a solid white picture can be on for 4 hours. Where it can stay on for 8 hours displaying a black picture. Also cell signal matters. A slow weak signal drains faster. Being on Wi-Fi helps.
There's just Soooo many factors to consider!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea I know that much is very true, just when I had a Note I didn't have a chance to try out the 2 firmwares to see which one worked longer and better so I could tell whether JB really was a improvement or a glorified enhancement.
Invest in a backup battery and carry it in your lunch box or whatever. Run jellybeans. It's worth it, then over clock and under volt.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
mv1luv said:
Invest in a backup battery and carry it in your lunch box or whatever. Run jellybeans. It's worth it, then over clock and under volt.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea I've got a ebay buy it now auction saved for a generic 5400mah battery and a official mugen 5400mah battery back cover...
I won my mom a Note for 140 for christmas, she's 66 and has carpel tunnel syndrome and even had surgery on her wrists and had something done where they clip the veins and arteries and then reattach them. Had a crudy lil lg dynamic and a resistive touchscreen loved android but the soft screen wouldn't cooperate with the way she touched it, that and she even said it was too small and needed something like my note 2 with the bigger screen and buttons.
Next up on the list is to create a simple one or two paged dumbed down minimalistic theme that's lockable and can't have the widgets rearranged accidentally by hard slip of the hand(Sometimes she presses things too hard or not hard enough, barely any feeling in her fingers at all), then load the local grocery, drug and retail store app's on it a couple receipt app's qvc, shophq and hsn on it for her too.

Possible to have always on lockscreen to show time like Nokia Lumais

Somehow Nokia Lumias are managing to have an always on screen using plain ol LCD and not OLED tech... apparently the battery drain is minimal something like 1% a day.... the author reckons that it's something to do with the screen brightness being really reduced or something...
Is this possible to implement with the Truesmart because this would really be a killer feature!!!
http://allaboutwindowsphone.com/features/item/18191_Nokia_works_a_LCD_miracle-Glan.php
That is pretty damn cool
The nearest i could find was clock view, this allows you just to show the time with a mainly black screen and with the brightness turned right down...
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.kimscom.clockview
Im going to see how much of a drain it is, but the backlight is still on so prolly plenty; Thing is on a lumia the battery is gonna be pretty bad compared to a smartwatch so a days worth of battery is good for a phone but terrible for a watch..

Categories

Resources