Hi guys..
I install RR V2..6.1 in my SGS2 i'm been use for 3 days whith fluxi kernel on conservative governor.
I'm was reading the forum and i see lot's of post whith syrah kernel..
Someone can say me the basic pro and cons please?
I'm not sure if i will change to syrah kernel for best performance and battery life.
I'm a conservative user. i'd like lot's of battery in my phone. i'm a pasive user (facebook, soundhound, whatsapp, dolphin browser, and mayybee on weekends Hard games like Max payne and Spiderman)
I have aoonen battery 2500 mAh
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Bye.
It's not a question about pros and cons, it's about what you expect from your phone. You have to try them all and choose what you want and serves you best.
I used Fluxxi, Siyah, CM9 and others kernels. I enjoy more the Siyah, because I believe it hands to you more performance on the CPU's and the touch is better, with more configurations on the tweaks then others kernels delivers. But a lot of people prefers Fluxxi, and others prefers other kernels.
delawalla said:
It's not a question about pros and cons, it's about what you expect from your phone. You have to try them all and choose what you want and serves you best.
I used Fluxxi, Siyah, CM9 and others kernels. I enjoy more the Siyah, because I believe it hands to you more performance on the CPU's and the touch is better, with more configurations on the tweaks then others kernels delivers. But a lot of people prefers Fluxxi, and others prefers other kernels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
basically the battle is between Fluxxi and Syrah
WeeMaNcL said:
basically the battle is between Fluxxi and Syrah
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
u have already tried fluxi and have a bench mark of batt life for a head start, now u can try siyah v3.4.1 and see for a cpl of charge cycles and make out the difference
Related
Okay what is better eugenes super i/o
or team whiskeys 1300 overclocked kernel?
dont care about battery life though
Depends on what you're looking for.
Eugene's kernel is "stock" while tw's oc kernel is I9k based.
If you want speed, I'd suggest ttabbal's voodoo kernel (or one of the new stock voodoo kernels).
"if you amplify everything, nothing is heard"
I'd go Eugene's or the Voodoo. Less issues, as some phones can't handle OCing.
Team whiskeys d.o.w with axura and oclf works great
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
I'd never risk my file system for a higher quadrant score but that's me. Ttabbal's voodoo kernel or Supercurio's mass injected voodoo stock kernel for the Vibrant would be recommended. Lower quadrant score, but still very fast and more stable.
Alanrocks15 said:
Okay what is better eugenes super i/o
or team whiskeys 1300 overclocked kernel?
dont care about battery life though[/QUOTE
Some phones doesn't even support overclocking and your phone may freeze.
Now, since you are asking and not testing yourself, you are most likely a novice to low intermediate user. I wouldn't screw up with OC if that is the case. Also being based in a I9000 kernel, some other issues may and will araise.
Also Vodoo is fine, but brings a new set of issues (like forgetting to disabling it when flashing something else. Quadrant score is insane, but it does not mean the system is actually faster. Quadrant is not a very safe messure right now, it is only used because is the only one available.
These both kernels, will eat up ypur battery pretty fast.
eugenes super IO, seems to be very balanced, Does not bring the excitements nor the headhaches of oc and voodo, a great performance (i've been using it for a few days), do not feel any lags, no lost directories or any other weird thing like freezing, missing icons and the such, and an excellent battery life.
These are my 20 cents in the matter
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well i tried all of them bro and i found that i liked Super IO, and DOW14 came in second truly nice kernel fast and powerful with the oclf!! soo give dow14 a try if you dont care about battery life
The weird part of my phone is that on 1.2 and 1.4 ghz it freezes and the on 1.3 ghz its perfect?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Good signal, data speed and battery life on Android 4 (ICS):
- ROM: Resurrection 9.2 forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1436854
- KERNEL: untouched
- MODEM/RADIO: KI4 forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1277593
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
____________________________________
Good signal, data speed and battery life:
- GalaxyZero 0.47 Rom and
- Phenomenal 1.1 kernel.
- Modem file is untouched (KI1 with KI4 better speed)
Here are the links:
Rom forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1320868
Kernel forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1351191
Modem forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1277593
After 8 hours with mobile data on
77% accu left. Think this is a very good combination.
The recent XWK** or XXK** modems all worked fine for me so far.
What modem SW are you running at the moment?
KI4 is best for me (simyo). after 2days im at 87% battery with medium workday usage. KI4 + CM7 nightly #94 + Siyah 2.0 Kernel (no UC/UV) + only 3G active. pretty impressive.
UUK3 said:
Hi people, someone can tell me a good modem version for O2 germany? With good signal, data speed and battery consumption?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As I am on O2 in Germany too, I recommend to use the XXKI3 or XXKI4 modem.
They both are nearly equal in performance and battery life.
Some say that XXKI4 is a little bit better in wifi/mobile switching times, and other say that XXKI3 is a little bit better for battery life.
For me, both worked fine and I could not really see a significant difference at all.
So, it is your choice !
P.S.: Just to be sure, here is a link where to find the current modem files => http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=17967764&postcount=5
There are more links available ... but I think that one is OK to post here.
xxki4
im also in the o2 network, but with lidl mobile, live in berlin, so its a big city, lots of signal most of the time, was first on kg1, wasnt that bad, but ki4 is a lot better, so i would recommend it.
im on darkyrom2 base xxki3, ki4 modem, siyahkernel 2.0, no uc or uv, but changed the governor from on demand to smartassv2, use a darktheme and darkthemed laucher (go launcher ex) black (live starsfield) background, i also froze the samsung hubs and apps, and get 18 h of really good use, 5 1/2 h (on average) of display on (at about 15% brightness), before all the tweaks i was getting 3 1/2-4 hours of screen on time and about 12 hours alltogeher.
Ive been trying to find the best performance/reliability from some of our kernels and have a question.
HTC stock kernel quadrant 2500
HTC stock kernel antutu 5200-5400
DSB's kernel quadrant 1700
DSB's kernel antutu 5600
SO my question is, how can stock be that much faster in quadrant? I know benchmarkas generally dont matter but thats an 800 point diffrence. DO you guys feel that stock is faster? And how come antutu doesnt reflect that big of a diffrence?
mforminio7 said:
Ive been trying to find the best performance/reliability from some of our kernels and have a question.
HTC stock kernel quadrant 2500
HTC stock kernel antutu 5200-5400
DSB's kernel quadrant 1700
DSB's kernel antutu 5600
SO my question is, how can stock be that much faster in quadrant? I know benchmarkas generally dont matter but thats an 800 point diffrence. DO you guys real stock is faster? And how come antutu doesnt reflect that big of a diffrence?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You'll learn very quick here that many believe quadrant to be insanely inaccurate. Only look at antutu for results.
Tho benchmarks vary, it all matters how fluid the phone feels while using it.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA App
and everyone knows that most all benchmarks are hit or miss... it all about how it feels to you
After 11 hours of use, with widgets & apps running on the latest version of quadrant I got the following on Scott's ics 3.1
Seems good to me
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Khayos said:
After 11 hours of use, with widgets & apps running on the latest version of quadrant I got the following on Scott's ics 3.1
Seems good to me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm talking about gingerbread stock vs non stock kernels not ics. I know ics scores higher in benchmarks.
I get 2550 using quadrant and its pretty much the same every time and I'm stock but I take these app with a grain of salt.
Sent from my GT-P7510 using xda premium
Lol I got 1730 with DSBs on 1.8ghz, obviously thats waayy wrong. I got higher than that with my old Desire at 1.15ghz, my old galaxy got over 3k a lot. Lol.
my galaxy s2 can only have 2 hours of screen on time, can someone give me any information about screen time especially for 3D games?
maybe because the battery? my s2 is 2nd hand and the battery is made on 2011-8-8, its already 2 years,if you had buy a new battery please give information about screen on time with the new battery,especially on 3D games
my s2 is on stock JB 4.1.2 with speedmod kernel k5-8 and use pure perfomance script
battery test on gsmarena with the ics firmware can run 5 hours of internet browsing and 7 hours of video playback screen on time,it is true?
can anyone give advice for battery time latest ics 4.0.4 vs jb 4.1.2 stock?
amdultra said:
my galaxy s2 can only have 2 hours of screen on time, can someone give me any information about screen time especially for 3D games?
maybe because the battery? my s2 is 2nd hand and the battery is made on 2011-8-8, its already 2 years,if you had buy a new battery please give information about screen on time with the new battery,especially on 3D games
my s2 is on stock JB 4.1.2 with speedmod kernel k5-8 and use pure perfomance script
battery test on gsmarena with the ics firmware can run 5 hours of internet browsing and 7 hours of video playback screen on time,it is true?
can anyone give advice for battery time latest ics 4.0.4 vs jb 4.1.2 stock?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First of all,do not compare ICS with JB.Normally jellybean will have less battery,as it is a more recent Android,and it needs more performance.If battery is 2 years old,I suggest you to change it.Here is a nice and good battery,that I'm using too Battery.About software,I recommend you NeatROM with Apolo Kernel 4.12 Extreme v0.
i'm getting almost 5 hour but as you can see I didn't make proper test
using chameleon rom apolo 4.12 light hyper governor
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
With and without Ram Plus enabled The higher score is with Ram Plus disabled.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
How many runs did you make?
hand-filer said:
With and without Ram Plus enabled The higher score is with Ram Plus disabled.
View attachment 5862993
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I never get this results
aureum said:
How many runs did you make?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
3 including the one I ran a few minutes ago.
I need to test it again. I did not get such diff between ram off and on.
hoss_n2 said:
I never get this results
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To be honest I was a little surprised to get these results.
hand-filer said:
To be honest I was a little surprised to get these results.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The best I could get may be my device is not that good or very bloated
Best score so far: https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/292528
Guess what...we should all be proud of the device that we have in our hands. The single-core results are eerily close to my M1Pro MacBook Pro! Multicore is something else..but yeah we should be proud!
Guess what...we should all be proud of the device that we have in our hands. The single-core results are eerily close to my M1Pro MacBook Pro! Multicore is something else..but yeah we should be proud!
Well, afterall, i dont think device with 12GB or more RAM need RAM plus feature to begin with. This feature is a gimmick for lower range device, so that brand can market it to look like it have bigger memory.
otonieru said:
Well, afterall, i dont think device with 12GB or more RAM need RAM plus feature to begin with. This feature is a gimmick for lower range device, so that brand can market it to look like it have bigger memory.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup. I turned it off on my phone and the phone is averaging 8GB of RAM used.