4022 score on benchmark
I have attached the photo check it out
ROM : mwakious3D v11.3
Kernel : yoda v.09RC2
Cpu clock : 1.8ghz dual core
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using xda premium
You have very hot phone
What do you mean?
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using xda premium
Battery life?
On 1.8ghz it draines 95% in 2 hours i only chat in whatsapp no gaming no browsing not bad actually and this kernel is still beta we can beat the quad core
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using xda premium
elias17 said:
On 1.8ghz it draines 95% in 2 hours i only chat in whatsapp no gaming no browsing not bad actually and this kernel is still beta we can beat the quad core
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
by the way , on freeza's and cobraboy's ROM , I and most CDMA users gets 4200-4600 quadrant scores......yeahhh and that's without overclocking!!!!!!! imagine the scores at 1.8 ghz.
If we ever get linaro optimized cm9 or any Rom....scores would be much higher.
I doubt that buddy! Wihout overclocking?? Thats nearly impossible:/
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using xda premium
mnomaanw said:
by the way , on freeza's and cobraboy's ROM , I and most CDMA users gets 4200-4600 quadrant scores......yeahhh and that's without overclocking!!!!!!! imagine the scores at 1.8 ghz.
If we ever get linaro optimized cm9 or any Rom....scores would be much higher.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And if I remember right, that ROM is cooked to give you higher benchmark scores, but that does not translate into real world speed. Honestly, benchmark scores are relatively useless as I've had ROMs with mediocre scores feel a lot zippier than ones with high scores.
Yeah u are correct and lot of people have a wrong idea about benchmarks ! Like they compare a galaxy s2 i9100 with custom rom that got 4700 to a one x that scored 4700 but they dont realise that the one x is running a 720p display 1280x720 and the s2 800x480 so the one x has way more pixels to push ! If the one x was tested at 480p it would of smoked the s2
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using xda premium
I love our phone. It keeps getting better and better!
elias17 said:
4022 score on benchmark
I have attached the photo check it out
ROM : mwakious3D v11.3
Kernel : yoda v.09RC2
Cpu clock : 1.8ghz dual core
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Check this
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
elias17 said:
I doubt that buddy! Wihout overclocking?? Thats nearly impossible:/
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And yes it is possible I have a cdma Evo and on gb with a custom rom I got 4500 on quady with stock kernel the rom was very smooth and tweaked the crap out of
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
Cpu clocks?? Which rom is that?
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using xda premium
Thats from a cdma user
And if I remember right, that ROM is cooked to give you higher benchmark scores, but that does not translate into real world speed. Honestly, benchmark scores are relatively useless as I've had ROMs with mediocre scores feel a lot zippier than ones with high scores.
So its only cooked to give u high benchmark scores only
But on my phone with 4022 i can play nova 3 so smoothly no lags
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using xda premium
coal686 said:
And if I remember right, that ROM is cooked to give you higher benchmark scores, but that does not translate into real world speed. Honestly, benchmark scores are relatively useless as I've had ROMs with mediocre scores feel a lot zippier than ones with high scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I know but that ROM was much smoother on my EVO.
I don't depend on benchmarks as the screen resolution differs from phone to phone but there are "OFF SCREEN" gpu benchmarking apps too that does not depend on screen res.
And adreno 220 scores much better in normal gpu benchmark apps also like nenamark, scores a few fps better than Mali 400 though we have higher res!
I posted the above post just to show OP that much higher scores are possible as he himself posted his quad scores comparing to devices with higher resolution.
---------- Post added at 03:13 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:11 PM ----------
elias17 said:
Yeah u are correct and lot of people have a wrong idea about benchmarks ! Like they compare a galaxy s2 i9100 with custom rom that got 4700 to a one x that scored 4700 but they dont realise that the one x is running a 720p display 1280x720 and the s2 800x480 so the one x has way more pixels to push ! If the one x was tested at 480p it would of smoked the s2
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No offense, but that's what you did .
Yeah ur right lets say i am comapring to the atrix 4g which is a qhd phone too
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using xda premium
elias17 said:
Yeah ur right lets say i am comapring to the atrix 4g which is a qhd phone too
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then you should change the title from quad to dual.
gonna change the title to smoking the dual cores but i dont know to change to title on the xda app any help?
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using xda premium
gonna change the title to smoking the dual cores but i dont know to change to title on the xda app any help??
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using xda premium
Related
Why the g2x had SO MUCH better benchmark scores now before anyone says I'm *****ing know that I'm not I'm just asking why 2 phones with the same processors have such diff scores the photon NEVER goes over 60 fps in quadrant but the g2x gets like 100+ and out had 1080p video recording like wtf was motorola thinking sprints best motorola phone is average now a data now I'm just asking why cause that's really annoying but honestly this is just a question not *****ing again
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
because moto blur takes up more processing power ALSO the the photon has a 1ghz dual core and teh e4gt has a 1.2 ghz dual core. same ram i believe... but honestly until internet speeds are crazy increaded and battery life is maximized idc they all run around the same speed imo.
I think the G2X uses a different cpu/gpu.
clifton421 said:
I think the G2X uses a different cpu/gpu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No the g2x uses the tegra 2 same thing
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
I think it's software Optimization.
Its almost the same spec,and maybe our photon dont use its full power to conserve battery? Like shut down one core or something?
another viewpoint its the drivers.
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
Motorola has qHD resolution, so the gpu has to push 25% more pixels.
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
Isn't g2x stock vanilla android? That makes a world of difference
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
I thought it used hummingbird processor
Gh0zt718 said:
No the g2x uses the tegra 2 same thing
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
The MoPho runs circles around the POS!
Sent from my MoPho using the XDA Premium app
Gh0zt718 said:
Why the g2x had SO MUCH better benchmark scores now before anyone says I'm *****ing know that I'm not I'm just asking why 2 phones with the same processors have such diff scores the photon NEVER goes over 60 fps in quadrant but the g2x gets like 100+ and out had 1080p video recording like wtf was motorola thinking sprints best motorola phone is average now a data now I'm just asking why cause that's really annoying but honestly this is just a question not *****ing again
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
One of the things that throws of the result is the nonstandard resolution of the Photon. This odd screen size requires scaling be used to run most benchmarks full screen. On an unscaled Smartbench run the scores are much higher than scaled and are fairly close to the GSII NVidia.
Gh0zt718 said:
No the g2x uses the tegra 2 same thing
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are three different CPU's used in the GSII (NVidia, Samsung, Qualcomm). The benchmarks vary with the Qualcomm being the bottom of the list.
hello
i want to change from htc sensation to atrix 4G but i want to know..how much Atrix can get it in quadrant advanced..i want 2D & 3D result
which CPU & GPU is better ?? atrix or sensation ??
Quadrant will produce an inaccurate result because it is not dual core. There plenty of benchmark threads for reference.
Antutu seems to be a decent and well spoken about spp. Comparisons to other phones aswell as other options also has its own setcpu style program.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Anyone know if theres an app, or some way to overclock the gpu?
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using xda premium
Chances are no. I believe it has to be done on a kernel level. Also if an app says it does I would definitely stay away from the app Lol also have you tried the better drivers I've read that improve performance on gsm modles ??
#Root_Hack-Mod*Always\
Post your Quadrant scores. I got my stock EVO LTE as high as 5,278. What's yours?
Antebios said:
Post your Quadrant scores. I got my stock EVO LTE as high as 5,278. What's yours?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got my stock EVO as high as 5,278 too
Just did this one but I've gotten over 5200 in the past.
Sent from my EVO LTE!!
I mostly get around 5100, but this was my best.
I use Antutu for bench mark... I like that it gives sd read and write speeds
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
It took running quadrant about 6 times but I finally got it above 5200 typically I get about 5000
Sent from my EVO using XDA
it might be just me but it looks like our scores are mostly memory and io Our CPU seems worse than the one x, any idea why?
Sent from my EVO using XDA
Here's my AnTuTu screenshot. I got a score of 6891.
Hey, I only got 4867. What gives?
Sent from my EVO LTE using XDA
sslbaron said:
Hey, I only got 4867. What gives?
Sent from my EVO LTE using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't worry about it. I was able to get in the 7000s with my evo 3d and my Rezound with oc kernels and that is with the s3. Antutu can be a little buggy
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
I'm using viperROM. Got 5782 on Quadrant. CPU scores higher with viperROM, very close to the HTC One X.
Stock
from my LTEvo that will not have 4G coverage utill after I buy my next phone ......
I ran my fully stock phone once and got a 4800 flat. I was BLOWN away at the difference in graphics compared to my OG EVO.
Not to shabby?
Sent from my ADR6350 using XDA
People put way too much merit into benchmarks. Does your phone run smoothly and allow you to multi task everything you need to? If so, I think your phone is passing the human benchmark.
Sent from my Evo 4G LTE using Tapatalk
These benchmarks don't mean anything. The true benchmarks that matter are the ones the TRULY test the hardware.
Brought To You By TapTalk 2 Via LTevo
Yeah I didn't get a good score in cm9 I guess thats the one more accurate and sense 4.0 blows them up.
Sent from my HTC EVO 4G LTE
However in CM9 all the games run perfectly. GTA3 runs way better in cm9 and temple run is very very smooth.
Sent from my HTC EVO 4G LTE
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Quadrant may be good for bragging rights but it does little in terms of actual benchmarking....
Sent from LTEvo using XDA Premium
From the standard GPU clock to 266mhz 2d and 320mhz 3d doesn't seem much higher than the stock clock speeds. Is there any way to get the 3d to about 400mhz or any higher than 320mhz? Honestly I should of just bought the HTC evo 4g Lte.. Anyway any help will be thanked. I was trying to find a phone for gaming and thought this would be nice but I guess i didn't research enough. I feel that it can do better than 40 fps on games (with a lot of lag spikes). But I did get a newer ROM today so I'll try it out.
Sent from my Evo 3D CDMA using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Which game are you playing? ROM and kernel effect fps. I've seen a kernel that over clocked the GPU that high but was unstable
Sent from my DOWNGRADED EVO 3D now Free
jcfunk said:
Which game are you playing? ROM and kernel effect fps. I've seen a kernel that over clocked the GPU that high but was unstable
Sent from my DOWNGRADED EVO 3D now Free
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I play a lot of games such as. Modern combat 4, blitz brigade (if I put this in high performance it runs nice), Asphalt 8, Most of the Gameloft free (graphical games not the little 40mb 2d ones). Also the amazing spiderman. I have my GPU over clocked to 266mhz 2d and 320mhz 3d right now (or as kernel tuner says) I just feel it can go higher. What ROM/kernel do you have? I guess I could try it out. I'm currently on pacman 4.3.1 jb. I used to have 4.2.2 PAC ROM. Now I really like gingerbread ROMs the best because I think they are lighter and faster, but the problem is, either when I get a GB ROM there is a stock kernel or if there is a ROM with a pre kernel in it, the download isn't there, and if I have one with a stock kernel I can't find a GB kernel anywhere. If you can find one or know of I link of where I can get one that would be awesome! Because if i can have gb with it overclocked it will go super fast!!!Thanks for replying.
Sent from my Evo 3D CDMA using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
TeChNoC4AzY said:
I play a lot of games such as. Modern combat 4, blitz brigade (if I put this in high performance it runs nice), Asphalt 8, Most of the Gameloft free (graphical games not the little 40mb 2d ones). Also the amazing spiderman. I have my GPU over clocked to 266mhz 2d and 320mhz 3d right now (or as kernel tuner says) I just feel it can go higher. What ROM/kernel do you have? I guess I could try it out. I'm currently on pacman 4.3.1 jb. I used to have 4.2.2 PAC ROM. Now I really like gingerbread ROMs the best because I think they are lighter and faster, but the problem is, either when I get a GB ROM there is a stock kernel or if there is a ROM with a pre kernel in it, the download isn't there, and if I have one with a stock kernel I can't find a GB kernel anywhere. If you can find one or know of I link of where I can get one that would be awesome! Because if i can have gb with it overclocked it will go super fast!!!Thanks for replying.
Sent from my Evo 3D CDMA using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I recommend mirage kernel, it'll work wonders on your phone but there's no GB version of it
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Obeezy562 said:
I recommend mirage kernel, it'll work wonders on your phone but there's no GB version of it
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've used it before but I'll flash it again. Are there any GB kernels out at all? Or still avalible?
Sent from my Evo 3D CDMA using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Try out Virus's ROM
http://www.forums.infectedrom.com/showthread.php?t=561
Had ziggy kernel
Sent from my DOWNGRADED EVO 3D now Free
jcfunk said:
Try out Virus's ROM
http://www.forums.infectedrom.com/showthread.php?t=561
Had ziggy kernel
Sent from my DOWNGRADED EVO 3D now Free
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you using this ROM ATM? And do I have to register to download it?
Sent from my Evo 3D CDMA using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
No and no, lol used this ROM before ICS.
http://old.androidfilehost.com/main/EVO_3D_Developers/Virus/Eternity/Buildbox/3.0/
Sent from my DOWNGRADED EVO 3D now Free
jcfunk said:
No and no, lol used this ROM before ICS.
http://old.androidfilehost.com/main/EVO_3D_Developers/Virus/Eternity/Buildbox/3.0/
Sent from my DOWNGRADED EVO 3D now Free
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You that link you put is for the kitkat ROM? Lol i tried it and its way to buggy. Plus it doesn't even have a custom kernel for it...the gsm version of kitkat is better for now..but i cant use it.
Sent from my Evo 3D CDMA using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
? kitkat? That's Eternity by Virus.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
---------- Post added 21st November 2013 at 12:03 AM ---------- Previous post was 20th November 2013 at 11:25 PM ----------
Have you try Mean ROM ? Your asking for ginger bread?
Sent from my DOWNGRADED EVO 3D now Free
Evo 3d runs the new games like asphalt 8 , mc4 on low-medium quality..... Spiderman, gangstar rio, gangstar vegas, asphalt 7 and nova 3 look even worse as they run on very low graphics. Very little draw distance and lack of smoke, special lighting, destruction effects, makes gameplay unpleasant.
On iphone, ipad , galaxy s2, s3, s4 , note , note 2, note 3 (exynos) and many adreno 320 (obviously) play them better. But the exynos sgs2 which was released with evo 3d is much better in gaming. Watch gameplay of some games on YouTube, you will notice the extra effects and smoothness. Speaking the truth, the gameplay of any game is better with better graphics and much better fps on apple devices compared to android phones released with them or even little later.
Sent from my Evo 3D CDMA using Tapatalk
jcfunk said:
? kitkat? That's Eternity by Virus.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
---------- Post added 21st November 2013 at 12:03 AM ---------- Previous post was 20th November 2013 at 11:25 PM ----------
Have you try Mean ROM ? Your asking for ginger bread?
Sent from my DOWNGRADED EVO 3D now Free
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whoops your right sorry i was in another tab when i pressed your link, and i have not tried mean ROM. Can i please have a link to it? Does it have a kernel with it?
Sent from my Evo 3D CDMA using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Here is Mean ROM ICS
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1645211
Here is GB
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1466362
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
jcfunk said:
Here is Mean ROM ICS
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1645211
Here is GB
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1466362
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks! I'm about to try out the GB now.
Sent from my Evo 3D CDMA using XDA Premium 4 mobile app