I haven't seen any benchmark posts yet, so I figured I would make one. I'm currently on stock unrooted, no overclock, 32 GB Class 4 microSD card.
I ran three test suites, Quadrant, AnTuTu, and Passmark. Passmark is a link since it doesn't have a one page score screen, nor does it locate the microSD card since it's not in the old default location.
Quadrant:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
AnTuTu:
Passmark:
http://www.androidbenchmark.net/baseline.php?ids=46129
I'm interested to see what scores others have, especially those who got the chance to root and install the CPU overclock module.
So, I decided to run a benchmark on my second Droid Incredible 4G, since I hadn't done one since it was replaced. To my surprise, it's even better!
Look at that! 178 point increase! And I thought that was great until I ran it again! (which probably only improved because the processes were in memory now)
My phone is better than the One X! Though the bar looks slightly longer for the One X. Regardless, I'm pretty ecstatic.
100% stock and unrooted, so don't ask.
Since the 4.0.4 update:
This is great! Here are my results, bone stock.
Sent from my HTC Incredible 4G on Verizon's periodically blazing fast and mostly reliable 4G LTE network using xda-developers app
What's that? This thread is dead? Nah.
CM-10.2, kernel 3.4.62, 1.2GHz, interactive governor
AnTuTu Benchmark 4.0.3
Screenshots stitched together since 960px is too short for AnTuTu:
pacman 4.2(my own rom)
this is a screenshoot of my current rom(pacman rom) the kernel is stock cyanogenmod right now, been tweking the rom interactive 1.5ghz
What do these benchmarks measure?
Related
post your htc flyer benchmarks here (neocore , quadrant , linpak, nenamark)
any one got one
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I should Hope it beats the phones you listed!
cant you use something on par with the tablet, like another tablet?
upperkingjr said:
I should Hope it beats the phones you listed!
cant you use something on par with the tablet, like another tablet?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tablets.use.the same internals as smartphones.
here is mine. how you guys have such a high score?
L.E. got it better!
Has any one tried neocore
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using XDA App
This was my third run but they were all about the same.
Why does the flyer get such low score in quadrant? My Motorola Defy (oc to 1000mhz) gets a lot more than that.
drinkluder1 said:
Why does the flyer get such low score in quadrant? My Motorola Defy (oc to 1000mhz) gets a lot more than that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because your phone is junk! No just kidding, the quadrant score don't mean anything that I can find? On my old sgs I was rooted over clock my bench mark was like 1200 my wife was stock her bench mark was like 700 and to login to the Internet, go into sites, download apps, games everything was the same speed as mine?
Sent from my LT15i using XDA Premium App
What're you guys stable at? I'm stable with:
480/825 normal
320/600 charging
320/600 screen off(may need to raise because it takes a few seconds for calls to come through?)
I can play things like NFS Shift smoothly, never really had any problem at 825.
Optimus V running Aosp 2.3.4
How do you run at 825 stable!? goddamn champion you are!
I run 320/787 MHz @ smartass Gov
Ima champ, but you a champion lol
I run at 480/806 mhz, but I get kernel panics once in a while...
lol i'm not too sure about that, i heard it has to do with the "batch" your cpu was made in. maybe I gotta good one. I might try 844.
Edit: I'm trying it now...about to run nfs and some quadrants to see if anything goes wrong.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
2.3.3 stock with OC kernel .
I tried earlir 245/806 and got 1300+ quadrant score, but i moved back to 600 to save some battery.
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA App
That's my score on quadrant : Performance 245/768.
And that's with neocore:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1121958&highlight=clocked
I remain at 320/729 and its prrfectly stable for me.
Proud owner of lg optimus one
I am looking for system/build.prop last few line from the ics leak. If you can screenshot it that would be great. Also anyone running stock. 173 please do the same. My speeds do not seem to be quite as good on ics as they were and I would really like to check this out.
This is all the way at the bottom
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
thank you
Here ya go...
And for whatever it's worth, my speeds have increased ~25% with the new build and new radios, and this isn't in the best reception area/with full bars either...
I have NO idea what people are complaining about with this build (not saying this at you, I'm saying it to you) but hardware acceleration, the new kernel, the new radios and a 720p screen resolution make this an almost entirely new phone. Still the thinnest on the market and the fastest too (with overclocking). Now the most up to date as well!
Thank you. I must just be in a bad area
sovrce said:
Here ya go...
And for whatever it's worth, my speeds have increased ~25% with the new build and new radios, and this isn't in the best reception area/with full bars either...
I have NO idea what people are complaining about with this build (not saying this at you, I'm saying it to you) but hardware acceleration, the new kernel, the new radios and a 720p screen resolution make this an almost entirely new phone. Still the thinnest on the market and the fastest too (with overclocking). Now the most up to date as well!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You mean qHD. The phones display doesn't have the ability to push 720p. The resolution is 540 x 960
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA
Something must have improved with the update. (posted this on phandroid too)
Before update -- full benchmark -> scores between 4100 and 4300
After update -- full benchmark -> scores between 4900 and 5350 (with a couple that went down to 4500)
Ran quadrant 20 times before and after. Didn't install anything new or make any changes.
mycuzinvinny said:
Something must have improved with the update. (posted this on phandroid too)
Before update -- full benchmark -> scores between 4100 and 4300
After update -- full benchmark -> scores between 4900 and 5350 (with a couple that went down to 4500)
Ran quadrant 20 times before and after. Didn't install anything new or make any changes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. I keep thinking that I would do this but hadn't.
I will confirm your results. I was getting 4300-4500 or so before. Now I am getting 4700-5350. Nice to be at the top of the chart
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my Fireball using Xparent Blue Tapatalk 2
Nice to see this. It definitely feels smoother.
I noticed it was running way better after the update. Didn't run any tests...just a lot snappier and more responsive
Sent from my ADR6410LVW using xda app-developers app
BEFORE
---------------AFTER
I was an avid user of Chrome on my GNex until I found the stock Browser was faster. Now today, I wanted to see for myself which browser was faster using benchmark tests.
As unreliable as some benchmarks can be, there is some truth regarding scored. The lowest score pictured was on the stock Browser, and chrome had the highest score. I was surprised.
Both tests were, of course, ran with all background apps closed, same governor, cfq scheduler, etc.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 2
BFirebird101 said:
I was an avid user of Chrome on my GNex until I found the stock Browser was faster. Now today, I wanted to see for myself which browser was faster using benchmark tests.
As unreliable as some benchmarks can be, there is some truth regarding scored. The lowest score pictured was on the stock Browser, and chrome had the highest score. I was surprised.
Both tests were, of course, ran with all background apps closed, same governor, cfq scheduler, etc.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wonder if that "fastest score" is the new stock Android S4.
JerzeyLegend said:
I wonder if that "fastest score" is the new stock Android S4.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Possibly
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 2