I am on the hunt for an AOSP JB build that has no memory leaks and is somewhat stable enough.
I kinda use the stock TW camera a lot, so there's got to be some sort of valid replacement for it, whether it's already included or available as an apk.
I think that the memory leak on JB has not been fixed yet in any rom.
Personally, I'll stay with CM9 final for a couple of weeks, waiting for the latest big bugs to be fixed before jumping to CM10.
All JB roms have memory leak. They are labeling them with the term "stable" quit loosely
jhericurls said:
All JB roms have memory leak. They are labeling them with the term "stable" quit loosely
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gotcha. The term stable doesn't solely mean it's the opposite of unstable. I'd like to believe a stable ROM has everything working and all (major) kinks sorted out.
There are a few "fixes" for the memory leak that make it pretty bearable. I would recommend looking into them if you can, JB is quite nice.
jhericurls said:
All JB roms have memory leak. They are labeling them with the term "stable" quit loosely
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Couldn't have said it better myself. I wish I could shout it from the rooftops. A ROM with a memory leak, buggy camera and more is not stable. Hey I got a ROM booting! [STABLE] F*ck yeah! I think CM is the only one that got it right by not calling it stable, and branding it a preview, since it's nowhere near the finished product.
Then noobs are flamed when they ask why something is broken. Don't brand it as stable, don't confuse people. Say it's an alpha release, and it will have bugs, then have a reason to call them out on their stupidity.
joshnichols189 said:
There are a few "fixes" for the memory leak that make it pretty bearable. I would recommend looking into them if you can, JB is quite nice.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
JB is more than quite nice. I would now since I rolled JB on my Gnex before switching to the S3.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
best rom
try ressurection remix
When do you guess we'll have the memory leak fixed and various other glitches fixed?
Theshawty said:
When do you guess we'll have the memory leak fixed and various other glitches fixed?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When the Samsung source is leaked/released.
Sent from my GT-I9300
joshnichols189 said:
When the Samsung source is leaked/released.
Sent from my GT-I9300
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do they usually release source? If they do, it should be available sometime near the beginning of September.
Related
With all the kernels and releases coming out, what is the general consensus on when ICS ROMs will be considered stable or feature-complete?
Was the recent i777 leak what developers were looking for to complete/optimize ICS ROMs? Or are we still waiting on i777 kernel source? Is Entropy's kernel a long-term solution?
Just wondering when to flash.
Thanks forum.
joebobjoe said:
With all the kernels and releases coming out, what is the general consensus on when ICS ROMs will be considered stable or feature-complete?
Was the recent i777 leak what developers were looking for to complete/optimize ICS ROMs? Or are we still waiting on i777 kernel source? Is Entropy's kernel a long-term solution?
Just wondering when to flash.
Thanks forum.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would say we already have some stable ics roms like aokp and shomans rom and a few others im running ics now its perfect
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
But I remember being schooled about "oh we need i777 kernel source before we get ICS" whenever I inquired. We don't seem to have i777 source, but i9000 is good enough?
Let me rephrase my question, how much better will the current ROMs get when i777 kernel source is released? Will we see an AOSP ROM?
ymcmbforever said:
I would say we already have some stable ics roms like aokp and shomans rom and a few others im running ics now its perfect
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
joebobjoe said:
But I remember being schooled about "oh we need i777 kernel source before we get ICS" whenever I inquired. We don't seem to have i777 source, but i9000 is good enough?
Let me rephrase my question, how much better will the current ROMs get when i777 kernel source is released? Will we see an AOSP ROM?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I honestly doubt the i777 kernel source will affect us whatsoever unless of coarse some type of nfc is included
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
I have yet to find a single bug running Shoman's rom. Your mileage may vary, read the thread et cetera but if you're asking when to flash I'd just go for it.
+1 on Shoman's ICS rom. It has operated flawlessly for me.
I9100 source is what we needed. We're only a little bit behind I9100 now. I9100 ICS has some nasty stability problems, I'm hoping to fix them before releasing DD for ICS. I'm working with gokhanmoral and a few others on it, it's not I777 unique.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
SHOstock ICS rom is amazingly stable and already in 5th release with more on the way
CM9 now has nightly builds for I-777. I fell in love with CM7 and am really liking the official CM9 nighty builds so far.
ICS leak
The ICS i777 leak, which has been bundled as a cwm zip without bootloaders
is working good for me with only a few minor bugs
alarms not working
wifi only scans after toggle
battery stats graph crashes
I don't know how this compares to i9100, the ICS leak is the first I've tried.
It's stable enough for me to not look back and stick with ICS
I'd definitely recommend SHOstock2, it's head and shoulders above the ATT leak in a lot of ways and I haven't had a single crash or noticed any bugs since installing RC4.
hbar said:
I'd definitely recommend SHOstock2, it's head and shoulders above the ATT leak in a lot of ways and I haven't had a single crash or noticed any bugs since installing RC4.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with the uclc2 leak, I had the following issues: Titanium Backup would not install any of my games+data and 1/2 my apps would not install. From what I could tell were any of the apps and games that I had moved over to sd card would not be restored under the leak. Than all of a sudden, my phone had locked up after getting most of my apps *from the batch restore missing apps and data* and quit even getting service when wifi was on and try to turn off wifi = lockup/reboot. Really weird after 4 hours of running it. Under SHOstock2 Rc4 everything restored properly and even upgrading to rc5 which gave back the multi toggle options and running very stable. Zero issue with it.
HTH,
Charlie
I've been running LilChris's phone-bricker with zero problems. Restored apps and data using tibu. Fast and smooth.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using XDA
Been running the AOKP build from Ported Dev thread with no major problems. Only problem is that when I am listening to music and a text or notification comes in, the music volume is lowered by 2 notches, then when I try to turn it up it goes by about 3 notches. Its a balancing act to get the volume back. Thats my only grippe. I havent had much time to read so I dont know if the newer ICS roms have fixed that issue.
It seems like all the ROMs have a few little glitches. Is there an ICS ROM that can record video at 1080p? Or connect to a 5GHz AP? Or has HDMI/MHL functionality?
I'm switching to the first one that does all 3. I'd be really excited if we can get NFC too.
Entropy512 said:
I9100 source is what we needed. We're only a little bit behind I9100 now. I9100 ICS has some nasty stability problems, I'm hoping to fix them before releasing DD for ICS. I'm working with gokhanmoral and a few others on it, it's not I777 unique.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is what gets me excited. It's always great to hear that developers from the android community are working together to bring exciting features to our phones. Thanks for all of your hardwork. I wish I would have stayed a computer engineering in college so I could help out, but it you all need testers let me know.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
ferrocene said:
It seems like all the ROMs have a few little glitches. Is there an ICS ROM that can record video at 1080p? Or connect to a 5GHz AP? Or has HDMI/MHL functionality?
I'm switching to the first one that does all 3. I'd be really excited if we can get NFC too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try lp3 stock from i9100 forum.. Flash with mobil odin but make sure in same flash you use entropy kernel and one of are modems. Then switch usr touchkey file.. Instructions in port section for file.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-2
So, uh, whats the point of this thread? Why do we need another ICS thread? If this is truly different than the main ICS thread then it can stay open, but from what im reading, its not.
Red5 said:
So, uh, whats the point of this thread? Why do we need another ICS thread? If this is truly different than the main ICS thread then it can stay open, but from what im reading, its not.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea I now see why the mods are so close-happy in this sub-forum. I'm sorry, I didn't mean to invoke a flood of ROM-reviews by starting this thread. All I had wanted was a general outlook of ROM-stability coming from official leaks and releases.
We are going to receive update for ICS soon. I just came across an article that I would like to share the differences between both OS and understand more about them. I'm sure you are all professional with the LEAK ICS by now.
It's also explain why the RAM we've seen is lesser then in GB OS
Mod, if you think it's not a right place, just close it
http: //www.androidauthority.com/android-2-3-gingerbread-vs-android-4-0-ice-cream-sandwich-37742/
Thanks for the link. It was a nice intro to ICS.
I'm new on Android and GB is pretty cool (rocking Saurom 7.1). I wasn't really sure what ICS features were new over what I already have.
Im on gingerbread with Saurom Rom and love it. Tried the Ics. Leak and had some issues with It so i went back to Saurom Rom
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
I must have missed the part of the article that explains why the RAM is less in ICS vs GB?
sweetboy02125 said:
We are going to receive update for ICS soon. I just came across an article that I would like to share the differences between both OS and understand more about them. I'm sure you are all professional with the LEAK ICS by now.
It's also explain why the RAM we've seen is lesser then in GB OS
Mod, if you think it's not a right place, just close it
http: //www.androidauthority.com/android-2-3-gingerbread-vs-android-4-0-ice-cream-sandwich-37742/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lindenhurst said:
Im on gingerbread with Saurom Rom and love it. Tried the Ics. Leak and had some issues with It so i went back to Saurom Rom
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 I tried ICS roms too only to be disappointed I mean don't get me wrong I really appreciate the devs but the ICS leak is so unstable it makes it no fun,I'll just wait for official ICS until I flash another leak build, I'm also using Saurom 7.1. IMO its the best so far
Maybe it is because I'm a bit new at this, but after running ICS leak for a couple weeks, I really do not see the big advantage over Gingerbread. It seems like an incremental upgrade and nota revamp of the operating system.
Compared to Saurom Rom, it was no big deal. I guess compared to stock GB, it is noticeably faster.
I guess we'll see soon enough.
I'm on stock unrooted and I just want a rooted, hassle-free experience. So which rom right now has the least known complications? Just a quick look at the development section makes me think it might be the Unofficial Rom.
Any recommendations?
I'm pretty happy with the alpha 2 from DAGr8. His third version gave me too many problems. The other roms' forums seem full of problems with the store or messages...I guess just try a few. If you nandroid where you are now switch back shouldn't be too hard
Budge said:
I'm on stock unrooted and I just want a rooted, hassle-free experience. So which rom right now has the least known complications? Just a quick look at the development section makes me think it might be the Unofficial Rom.
Any recommendations?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There aren't many at the moment. I would suggest staying stock with some tweaks until our phone becomes more widespread(it's still new)
I just flashed theunofficial and so far it hasn't given me any problems.
Sent from my Galaxy Note
I would give unofficial a try. It is by far the most stable custom rom I have ever used. It has never frozen, given me FCs, or had weird random issues. So basically it works flawlessly and this is the first custom rom I can honestly say that about.
uncleTed said:
I'm pretty happy with the alpha 2 from DAGr8. His third version gave me too many problems. The other roms' forums seem full of problems with the store or messages...I guess just try a few. If you nandroid where you are now switch back shouldn't be too hard
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Sent from my ICS powered Note
xda1zero said:
There aren't many at the moment. I would suggest staying stock with some tweaks until our phone becomes more widespread(it's still new)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I want to try at least one Rom, then I may go to this.
uncleTed and thephoneguyusa, have you tried Unofficial and you still recommend alpha2? Thanks.
Budge said:
I want to try at least one Rom, then I may go to this.
uncleTed and thephoneguyusa, have you tried Unofficial and you still recommend alpha2? Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have used unofficial and it is good as well but if you want ICS not Gingerbread alpha2 is the way to go in my opinion.
Sent from my ICS powered Note
I have flashed all the roms and i keep coming back to Saurom 7.1 I do like the unofficial as well. You have to at least try 2 of them to test around with because really comes down to personal preference when many roms become stable.
toucan203 said:
I have flashed all the roms and i keep coming back to Saurom 7.1 I do like the unofficial as well. You have to at least try 2 of them to test around with because really comes down to personal preference when many roms become stable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 - Saurom 7.1 FTW
thephoneguyusa said:
+1
Sent from my ICS powered Note
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
uncleTed said:
I'm pretty happy with the alpha 2 from DAGr8. His third version gave me too many problems. The other roms' forums seem full of problems with the store or messages...I guess just try a few. If you nandroid where you are now switch back shouldn't be too hard
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 as well. I've been on Alpha 2 since it was put out and its been pretty much rock solid. Alpha 3 was different story.
toucan203 said:
I have flashed all the roms and i keep coming back to Saurom 7.1 I do like the unofficial as well. You have to at least try 2 of them to test around with because really comes down to personal preference when many roms become stable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+ 1 for Saurom 7.1. It's the only one I've ever used due to the fact it's never given me a reason to look anywhere else...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
+1 - Saurom 7.1 Here as well still!
I like the latest Unofficial...no FC's, nothing extra to flash, and it has a great theme.
Saurom. Nothing better period
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
+1 unofficial is a great rom I'm also useing with the SPB shell 3D, it's so fast and smooth. So much eye candy
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
I also must jump on the Unofficial bandwagon as it is "very" stable. I was on Solaris for a while but it seems to be out of the picture for now. But if you want a hassle-free experience, go for the Unofficial.
Another for "The Unofficial". Great ROM, very stable and smooth.
Dag_8 Alpha II is the best ICS out so far. It's currently my daily driver.
Alpha III caused SMS issues and other FCs.
If playing4sheezy comes out with Beta 2 for NOTEWorthy then I'll be switching to it, because it is the smoothest, cleanest, ICS out yet...
A Question
I have a question for the folks using alpha II, what do you like about it over Alpha I? I keep comming back to Alpha I because it is the most stable for me.
Cheers
BR
Well, all the Sense 4 ROMs drain my battery like its nobody's business, and personally I really don't seem to like Sense anymore. I know that newtoroot came out with an AOSP rom awhile back in like February, but has anyone been working on one since? And I know people "claim" to have AOSP roms but all of them are still using sense's SystemUI, so im looking for a FULL AOSP rom. thanks to anyone who can help.
zZDave_Stud said:
Well, all the Sense 4 ROMs drain my battery like its nobody's business, and personally I really don't seem to like Sense anymore. I know that newtoroot came out with an AOSP rom awhile back in like February, but has anyone been working on one since? And I know people "claim" to have AOSP roms but all of them are still using sense's SystemUI, so im looking for a FULL AOSP rom. thanks to anyone who can help.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since this is a pretty touchy subject... I'll handle it.
We do not have full functioning AOSP roms. The rezound has very difficult tech to reverse engineer. The AOSP roms that do exist all have no data, text, or call capability. Not even wifi. A few have tried to work on getting AOSP over but either stopped in the hopes that the ICS OTA stuff will help or they just dumped the rezound completely. I just hope you don't get flamed.
What hurts the rezound, was that everyone was expecting to get it and then immediately switch to ICS so the gingerbread development lacked a lot. And leaks don't really help us at all as far as ICS goes. Here we are 8 months after the debut of ICS and we are still left out in the cold.
There are a few people still trying to make AOSP happen, but for now, senseless is as close as you'll get.
bukithd said:
Since this is a pretty touchy subject... I'll handle it.
We do not have full functioning AOSP roms. The rezound has very difficult tech to reverse engineer. The AOSP roms that do exist all have no data, text, or call capability. Not even wifi. A few have tried to work on getting AOSP over but either stopped in the hopes that the ICS OTA stuff will help or they just dumped the rezound completely. I just hope you don't get flamed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not gonna get flamed. But newtoroots AOSP Rom was so close to perfect, ril worked, everything ran perfectly, except for a few bugs here and there. I would love if some awesome dev out there would take that Rom, fix it up, and put it on the forums. That's my two cents. Thanks for the feedback man.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
zZDave_Stud said:
I'm not gonna get flamed. But newtoroots AOSP Rom was so close to perfect, ril worked, everything ran perfectly, except for a few bugs here and there. I would love if some awesome dev out there would take that Rom, fix it up, and put it on the forums. That's my two cents. Thanks for the feedback man.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That wasn't aosp brohan. I reiterate, no aosp, only SENSELESS
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
I know but it actually used an AOSP SystemUI which is all that I really want. I can post pics if necessary (though it'll be hard on my phone lol)
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Let's not flame this guy. Let's turn this into a productive thread about AOSP even though we have scattered comments about AOSP/AOKP/CM in random threads.
Chad is working on RIL issues in his upcoming kernel. Chad is an extremely busy student so don't expect anything soon although he has gotten calls/sms/1x data working.
We really don't have an updated version of CM9 or AOKP but since we don't have data for them yet, there is no reason to make a ROM bot for them automatically compiling roms nightly.
OK now let's get productive. We have GB source. I don't understand why we don't have a CM7 rom yet. Well, I didn't understand why until I tried do compile/port one myself. I am not an expert at compiling from source especially when our device isn't officially supported but my port won't boot past the splash screen. I am thinking about putting the port up in the dev section and turning it into a community project. I have tried the Demonizing AOSP kernel and I have compiled multiple CM7 kernels from source but still no booting.
I know CM7 is GB based but it's better than nothing at least until we get ICS source.
Quada said:
Let's not flame this guy. Let's turn this into a productive thread about AOSP even though we have scattered comments about AOSP/AOKP/CM in random threads.
Chad is working on RIL issues in his upcoming kernel. Chad is an extremely busy student so don't expect anything soon although he has gotten calls/sms/1x data working.
We really don't have an updated version of CM9 or AOKP but since we don't have data for them yet, there is no reason to make a ROM bot for them automatically compiling roms nightly.
OK now let's get productive. We have GB source. I don't understand why we don't have a CM7 rom yet. Well, I didn't understand why until I tried do compile/port one myself. I am not an expert at compiling from source especially when our device isn't officially supported but my port won't boot past the splash screen. I am thinking about putting the port up in the dev section and turning it into a community project. I have tried the Demonizing AOSP kernel and I have compiled multiple CM7 kernels from source but still no booting.
I know CM7 is GB based but it's better than nothing at least until we get ICS source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fix RIL would still be necessary for CM7 as it is for CM9. So given our most recent leaks/RUUs, makes since to focus on one vs. The other... Gingerbread is ooooooold
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
Quada said:
Let's not flame this guy. Let's turn this into a productive thread about AOSP even though we have scattered comments about AOSP/AOKP/CM in random threads.
Chad is working on RIL issues in his upcoming kernel. Chad is an extremely busy student so don't expect anything soon although he has gotten calls/sms/1x data working.
We really don't have an updated version of CM9 or AOKP but since we don't have data for them yet, there is no reason to make a ROM bot for them automatically compiling roms nightly.
OK now let's get productive. We have GB source. I don't understand why we don't have a CM7 rom yet. Well, I didn't understand why until I tried do compile/port one myself. I am not an expert at compiling from source especially when our device isn't officially supported but my port won't boot past the splash screen. I am thinking about putting the port up in the dev section and turning it into a community project. I have tried the Demonizing AOSP kernel and I have compiled multiple CM7 kernels from source but still no booting.
I know CM7 is GB based but it's better than nothing at least until we get ICS source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the feedback man. And goodluck on your AOSP GB Rom man. And one quick question, (hope I don't sound like a noon) umm, who exactly is chad?
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Quada said:
Let's not flame this guy. Let's turn this into a productive thread about AOSP even though we have scattered comments about AOSP/AOKP/CM in random threads.
Chad is working on RIL issues in his upcoming kernel. Chad is an extremely busy student so don't expect anything soon although he has gotten calls/sms/1x data working.
We really don't have an updated version of CM9 or AOKP but since we don't have data for them yet, there is no reason to make a ROM bot for them automatically compiling roms nightly.
OK now let's get productive. We have GB source. I don't understand why we don't have a CM7 rom yet. Well, I didn't understand why until I tried do compile/port one myself. I am not an expert at compiling from source especially when our device isn't officially supported but my port won't boot past the splash screen. I am thinking about putting the port up in the dev section and turning it into a community project. I have tried the Demonizing AOSP kernel and I have compiled multiple CM7 kernels from source but still no booting.
I know CM7 is GB based but it's better than nothing at least until we get ICS source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's interesting. I always just assumed everyone was so focused on ICS/CM9 that they just never bothered with CM7. I would probably use CM7 over our current crop of ICS choices to be honest.
zZDave_Stud said:
Thanks for the feedback man. And goodluck on your AOSP GB Rom man. And one quick question, (hope I don't sound like a noon) umm, who exactly is chad?
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1437198&page=70 <<<< chad. Try to refrain from bugging him though, like I said, he is very busy.
fo0you said:
Fix RIL would still be necessary for CM7 as it is for CM9. So given our most recent leaks/RUUs, makes since to focus on one vs. The other... Gingerbread is ooooooold
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes but it would be much much easier to fix because we has source. Chad even said that 99% of the issues is just rearranging libraries in the kernel.
dogswind said:
That's interesting. I always just assumed everyone was so focused on ICS/CM9 that they just never bothered with CM7. I would probably use CM7 over our current crop of ICS choices to be honest.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would use CM7 over ICS sense as well. I believe a lot of users on here would feel the same.
Quada said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1437198&page=70 <<<< chad. Try to refrain from bugging him though, like I said, he is very busy.
Yes but it would be much much easier to fix because we has source. Chad even said that 99% of the issues is just rearranging libraries in the kernel.
I would use CM7 over ICS sense as well. I believe a lot of users on here would feel the same.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright thanks for letting me know who he was. So now, basically, Chads upcoming kernel will make all current AOSP roms a daily driver (with ril working)? Please tell me if this is incorrect. If its not then I'm actually kind of excited!
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Quada said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1437198&page=70 <<<< chad. Try to refrain from bugging him though, like I said, he is very busy.
Yes but it would be much much easier to fix because we has source. Chad even said that 99% of the issues is just rearranging libraries in the kernel.
I would use CM7 over ICS sense as well. I believe a lot of users on here would feel the same.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yesss I'd love to have a cm7 . I actually just downgraded back to gb firmware
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
zZDave_Stud said:
Alright thanks for letting me know who he was. So now, basically, Chads upcoming kernel will make all current AOSP roms a daily driver (with ril working)? Please tell me if this is incorrect. If its not then I'm actually kind of excited!
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no guarantee of him getting 3g/4g data working, but if he does then ICS AOSP roms will become a reality.
Quada said:
There is no guarantee of him getting 3g/4g data working, but if he does then ICS AOSP roms will become a reality.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright awesome, thanks for the replies everyone, I can't wait for chad's kernel. And I believe that atm I would use CM7 over the assortment of ics roms we have as well.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
zZDave_Stud said:
Alright thanks for letting me know who he was. So now, basically, Chads upcoming kernel will make all current AOSP roms a daily driver (with ril working)? Please tell me if this is incorrect. If its not then I'm actually kind of excited!
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't hold my breath. Bottom line is that there has been no updates released to the "public" in a couple of months, just word of mouth that they have it working, except for a few bugs.
Quada said:
Let's not flame this guy. Let's turn this into a productive thread about AOSP even though we have scattered comments about AOSP/AOKP/CM in random threads.
Chad is working on RIL issues in his upcoming kernel. Chad is an extremely busy student so don't expect anything soon although he has gotten calls/sms/1x data working.
We really don't have an updated version of CM9 or AOKP but since we don't have data for them yet, there is no reason to make a ROM bot for them automatically compiling roms nightly.
OK now let's get productive. We have GB source. I don't understand why we don't have a CM7 rom yet. Well, I didn't understand why until I tried do compile/port one myself. I am not an expert at compiling from source especially when our device isn't officially supported but my port won't boot past the splash screen. I am thinking about putting the port up in the dev section and turning it into a community project. I have tried the Demonizing AOSP kernel and I have compiled multiple CM7 kernels from source but still no booting.
I know CM7 is GB based but it's better than nothing at least until we get ICS source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think making it a community rom is a pretty good idea.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
zZDave_Stud said:
I know but it actually used an AOSP SystemUI which is all that I really want. I can post pics if necessary (though it'll be hard on my phone lol)
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If that's all you really need then use Slim or CleanRom DE. Slim especially has pretty much all of Sense stripped away either is worlds better for battery life.
Chad is doing what protekk couldnt do.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
Newt is currently working on aokp. Says he has calls and texts working so far and next step is data.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
Hi guys,
I am currently on AOKP ICS M6 and really like the stability of it. With JB 4.1.2 out, would you guys reckon that it will be stable enough for use as a daily driver?? My Nexus device runs well with JB 4.1.2 and I kinda like the fluidity and added functions of it. Will hope that I can replicate that in my SGS2.
Which build will be a good place to start if I am most concerned about stability and battery life?? CM10 nightlies? Kinda disappointed that CM has dropped supported for SGS2 and I am wondering if this affects the quality of the nightlies.
CM10 is pretty stable, for sure you can use it as daily driver.
tobyhund said:
Hi guys,
I am currently on AOKP ICS M6 and really like the stability of it. With JB 4.1.2 out, would you guys reckon that it will be stable enough for use as a daily driver?? My Nexus device runs well with JB 4.1.2 and I kinda like the fluidity and added functions of it. Will hope that I can replicate that in my SGS2.
Which build will be a good place to start if I am most concerned about stability and battery life?? CM10 nightlies? Kinda disappointed that CM has dropped supported for SGS2 and I am wondering if this affects the quality of the nightlies.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Take a look at rootbox jb 3.0. That with dorimanx 7.4 is really stable and has good battery life.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
kilometers4 said:
Take a look at rootbox jb 3.0. That with dorimanx 7.4 is really stable and has good battery life.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
played around with various JBs. I find that they are quite stable apart from the occasional FCs.
However, this one bug really irritates me and will be the deal breaker for JB: >>> Half Volume Bug!!!
Can I confirm that this bug is common across all versions of JB, be it AOKP/CM??
tobyhund said:
played around with various JBs. I find that they are quite stable apart from the occasional FCs.
However, this one bug really irritates me and will be the deal breaker for JB: >>> Half Volume Bug!!!
Can I confirm that this bug is common across all versions of JB, be it AOKP/CM??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
for now its a known issue on all JB roms be it AOKP or CM10, but u can boost a bit if ur using Siyah or Dorimanx kernels with xtweaks app
Sun90 said:
for now its a known issue on all JB roms be it AOKP or CM10, but u can boost a bit if ur using Siyah or Dorimanx kernels with xtweaks app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks for the tip.. :good:
but the wouldnt it just make the jumps in audio volume between steps bigger???
tobyhund said:
played around with various JBs. I find that they are quite stable apart from the occasional FCs.
However, this one bug really irritates me and will be the deal breaker for JB: >>> Half Volume Bug!!!
Can I confirm that this bug is common across all versions of JB, be it AOKP/CM??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe its just me, but I'm on Paranoid Android 2.5 and theres no volume issues whatsoever. First time I took a call after flashing this rom almost popped me eardrums out. Worth a try if that's what is stopping you from going JB 4.1.2 . No FCs so far either.
I often run piers unofficial aokp and sometimes official builds and I haven't experienced that bug. Not even once.
Oh and I'm obiesly talking about jb.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
tobyhund said:
played around with various JBs. I find that they are quite stable apart from the occasional FCs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know about the fcs. I've been using rb since the beginning and haven't had any...
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium