Related
Dear friends,
I just install Cyanogenmod 7.2 RC0 (built 2/10/12) on my HTC Aria.
After this I have some problems:
1. Home and Search Buttons doesn't work;
2. Screenlock doesn't work ( I tried pattern lock configuration).
Have you any experience?
Need your help.
Best regards,
Mamuka
gijua_rx7 said:
Dear friends,
I just install Cyanogenmod 7.2 RC0 (built 2/10/12) on my HTC Aria.
After this I have some problems:
1. Home and Search Buttons doesn't work;
2. Screenlock doesn't work ( I tried pattern lock configuration).
Have you any experience?
Need your help.
Best regards,
Mamuka
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try doing a clean install.
What do you mean in "clean install"?
Is it better to install "Nightly" then "RC"?
Please, give me a download link for CM 7.2 fully working version without any bugs.
gijua_rx7 said:
What do you mean in "clean install"?
Is it better to install "Nightly" then "RC"?
Please, give me a download link for CM 7.2 fully working version without any bugs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It means to wipe everything before flashing. Try the one in this post: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=24340035&postcount=250. Nightlies are more updated than RCs.
Theonew said:
It means to wipe everything before flashing. Try the one in this post: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=24340035&postcount=250. Nightlies are more updated than RCs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but the nightlies are more buggy than the rc's, the rc's are more buggy than the stable. The stable versions are just what the name says, IMO The stable versions are the best if you dont want to deal with bugs. If you are like me and dont mind them then go with nightlies or the RC's. Personally I am using the RC from the cyanogenmod site.
benbailey84 said:
but the nightlies are more buggy than the rc's, the rc's are more buggy than the stable. The stable versions are just what the name says, IMO The stable versions are the best if you dont want to deal with bugs. If you are like me and dont mind them then go with nightlies or the RC's. Personally I am using the RC from the cyanogenmod site.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The one I linked to has no noticeable bugs. Also, if something is a nightly, it doesn't mean that it needs to have bugs. Usually just the earlier nightlies have bugs.
Theonew said:
It means to wipe everything before flashing. Try the one in this post: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=24340035&postcount=250. Nightlies are more updated than RCs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you very much. This version works without problems.
Problem's with twitter
Sorry me for my bad english.
I was installed CuanogenMod 7.2.0-RC1 and after that twitter hasn't working. How I
make to work that?
Thanks you.
Dn4g said:
Sorry me for my bad english.
I was installed CuanogenMod 7.2.0-RC1 and after that twitter hasn't working. How I
make to work that?
Thanks you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
only install gapp.
bigboss555 said:
only install gapp.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
could you tell me a titles of this gapp. Where I can get it? Google Play?
Dn4g said:
could you tell me a titles of this gapp. Where I can get it? Google Play?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gapps are available here: http://goo.im/gapps/gapps-gb-20110828-signed.zip.
Theonew said:
Gapps are available here
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have installed gapps, but Twitter doesnt want to work anyway.
hi,
my first post in the go/sola/p/u forum. i really like the idea of a clean version of android without bloatware and the proprietary ui of the device manufacturers. so i was wondering if there is any rom based on cm10 or cm9 currently in the works for our devices?
srprashant91 said:
so i was wondering if there is any rom based on cm10 or cm9 currently in the works for our devices?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
FXP is working on it. Check this page.
jsel said:
FXP is working on it. Check this page.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
waiting eagerly for a release. stock androids give the best user experience imo
Maybe is it real now?
I owuld appreciate to test it, but I don't know how, if it like AOKP or something like that.
http://get.cm/?device=umts_spyder
http://wiki.cyanogenmod.org/w/Umts_spyder_Info
sound great!
but i think it just like the official AOKP
even though we have a good news again!
yyh2503 said:
sound great!
but i think it just like the official AOKP
even though we have a good news again!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortnatly, I've tried to flash just like AOKP but it stucks in "booting..." (with the android and engines in the background)
I've not tried in slot 1, I'm little affraid installing into slot 1 and brick or something else
Sv: [rom][gsm] cm 10.1 official
There is already a thread http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2028020
Sent from my XT910 using xda premium
guibovo said:
Maybe is it real now?
I owuld appreciate to test it, but I don't know how, if it like AOKP or something like that.
http://get.cm/?device=umts_spyder
http://wiki.cyanogenmod.org/w/Umts_spyder_Info
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is because of Hashcode's hard work and extraordinary amount of input into the Unofficial CM10.1, I am sure he will make a new post himself. I dont think you meant to steal his glory tho.
BlueEditionE6 said:
This is because of Hashcode's hard work and extraordinary amount of input into the Unofficial CM10.1, I am sure he will make a new post himself. I dont think you meant to steal his glory tho.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Uuh, sorry, I really did not see his post. ;$
My apologizes.
guibovo said:
Unfortnatly, I've tried to flash just like AOKP but it stucks in "booting..." (with the android and engines in the background)
I've not tried in slot 1, I'm little affraid installing into slot 1 and brick or something else
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you must be on a jb kernel....be careful with ics kernel,probably brick the device
Vallerino WR said:
I think you must be on a jb kernel....be careful with ics kernel,probably brick the device
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it's the opposite
Yes, it is, you must be on ICS kernel, that's the reason it has some bugs still, as BT one... IMHO
Enviado desde mi MOTOROLA RAZR usando Tapatalk 2
But I can ONLY install into sot_1?
Or are there a way to instal into slot_2?
Are there any problem installing in slot_1?
romdroid. said:
There is already a thread http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2028020
Sent from my XT910 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're wrong, it's a unofficial release. The one in this topic is a Official Release from cryanogen team.
Installed using BMM in slot 2, with the "why_we_have_to_skip_devfs_setup_myth.zip" patch.
Works great! Camcorder working but still no flash with de camera.
Anárhér said:
You're wrong, it's a unofficial release. The one in this topic is a Official Release from cryanogen team.
Installed using BMM in slot 2, with the "why_we_have_to_skip_devfs_setup_myth.zip" patch.
Works great! Camcorder working but still no flash with de camera.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why the CM, and the AOKP are made in ICS Kernel? Why the developers don't use the JB Kernel of the leaked Verizon?? Something prevents it?
Maybe because it's not an official version (it's a leaked).
guibovo said:
Maybe is it real now?
I owuld appreciate to test it, but I don't know how, if it like AOKP or something like that.
http://get.cm/?device=umts_spyder
http://wiki.cyanogenmod.org/w/Umts_spyder_Info
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's an image for download in the Nightly's session. You may download it and flash. That's all. I did it here through Safestrap 3.11 on Slot 1 and it wokred very well.
This ROM is awesome, but there still some artifacts and some other bugs known from AOKP.
But, for the whole thing, the system is sort of stable.
The official cm and aokp Roms are the same as Hashcode and Dhackers unofficial roms. The only difference is that we get updates directly from the aokp and cm teams now instead of Hashcode and Dhacker having to merge the changes from aokp and cm.
The official builds will stay on the ics kernel until the official jellybean build is released from Motorola. And probably will have to wait until Motorola releases the kernel source code.
Anárhér said:
You're wrong, it's a unofficial release. The one in this topic is a Official Release from cryanogen team.
Installed using BMM in slot 2, with the "why_we_have_to_skip_devfs_setup_myth.zip" patch.
Works great! Camcorder working but still no flash with de camera.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dude dont be stupid. its the same developer and the thread needs only to change the title to "official" from "unofficial" use common sense
I'm testing
I'm testing this rom since yesterday and it's very stable...
My razr has the ICS kernel, and I used Boot Manager on slot3 to test... Needed to patch devfs to boot..
The ROM is fast... but some old problems... like camera flash... the bluetooth I cant test since I dont have any BT devices...
Google now working... camera recording working... notification bar is the new 4.2.2 one
when flash camera is working it will be my default ROM...
awesome..
romdroid. said:
dude dont be stupid. its the same developer and the thread needs only to change the title to "official" from "unofficial" use common sense
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First, you need to be more polite with people you don't know. And second, despite the official build is only "cm" merged with hashcode's work it's still a new build since only now it will receive support from cyanogen team (not only about the razr port, which probably will continue to be hashcode's work, but about functionality, apps and more). But you're right, changing hashcode's thread title resolves, till he do that,it's the only thread that talk about the official release.
couillu44 said:
Maybe because it's not an official version (it's a leaked).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, but the ROM's make with the JB Kernel are very good and eliminate bugs such as camera flash and bluetooth.
>.< Is only for the JB kernel dude ? |
This was just a personal hobby project, but it seems many people are using these builds, so I'm starting this thread to keep the main CM thread clean.
The nightly is built at 6:30AM IndianStandardTime (GMT+5:30), and contains all changes synced till then. The most prominent difference between these builds and the official ones is that there builds are compiled using the Linaro toolchain. To me, this results in a smoother UI, and better battery life than the official builds. From time to time, these builds may also contain some hotfixes for small problems on official builds, and they may also contain some cherrypicks.
You can just install these builds over official builds without a data wipe. You can even go back to the official builds without a data wipe.
Download link: https://copy.com/vJqpoVqwoUXJ
Please check MD5 before flashing.
What are the drawbacks of building with Linaro? I assume there must be some, if the official build is not using this, right?
TheSaw said:
What are the drawbacks of building with Linaro? I assume there must be some, if the official build is not using this, right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The drawbacks are that theoretically, there might be some unexpected side effects if building from a non-standard compiler. I personally haven't seen any since I've been using it. Also, I think the CM team thinks Linaro is just placebo, and hence they don't use it.
kalpik said:
Please check MD5 before flashing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you please provide the MD5sum?
I'm glad you opened an independent thread for your build!
Keep it up!!
chrhei said:
Can you please provide the MD5sum?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The MD5s are also present in the link.
Is the pixelated icons fixed on your latest build: "6-25-2013"??
thanks..
markjamezmark said:
Is the pixelated icons fixed on your latest build: "6-25-2013"??
thanks..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, they are fixed. Just so you know, they will be fixed in the next official nightly too
kalpik said:
Yes, they are fixed. Just so you know, they will be fixed in the next official nightly too
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice! That's I've waiting for. Currently downloading your personal compiled build.
Do you have any ideas when the final/stable build will be released?
markjamezmark said:
Do you have any ideas when the final/stable build will be released?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Never, as our devices are't fully open source
kalpik said:
Never, as our devices are't fully open source
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is hotfix? Sry for noob question
And where is changelog?
dinos3 said:
What is hotfix? Sry for noob question
And where is changelog?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are no stupid questions, only stupid answers
I'm sorry I didn't explain it better in the OP. By hotfix, I mean like the icon pixellation issue that was present in the past few official nightly builds wasn't there on mine. So from time to time, if I find some problem in the official nightlies, and I can fix them, the fixes will be included in my builds
kalpik said:
There are no stupid questions, only stupid answers
I'm sorry I didn't explain it better in the OP. By hotfix, I mean like the icon pixellation issue that was present in the past few official nightly builds wasn't there on mine. So from time to time, if I find some problem in the official nightlies, and I can fix them, the fixes will be included in my builds
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks
Are you going to write changelog maybe?
Changelog is the same as the official changelog
Going to flash this because.
A) last few roms I Flashed have either broken phone or Gps won't lock never both working.
b) and cos cyanogen mod is my preferred base for a rom
thanks buddy will report back after installing
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
Just to be sure: Can I fix your build over the official CM10.1 nightly without a full wipe and go back to the official Nightly when needed?
Edit: Chrome reports m-10.1-20130625-UNOFFICIAL-i9100.zip as malicious "m-10.1-20130625-UNOFFICIAL-i9100.zip scheint schädlich zu sein."
feydakin said:
Just to be sure: Can I fix your build over the official CM10.1 nightly without a full wipe and go back to the official Nightly when needed?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is correct
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
diddly3000 said:
Going to flash this because.
A) last few roms I Flashed have either broken phone or Gps won't lock never both working.
b) and cos cyanogen mod is my preferred base for a rom
thanks buddy will report back after installing
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When GPS don't lock in a nightly, wipe cache partitions and dalvik cache and fix permitions. Ever works for me.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
feydakin said:
Chrome reports m-10.1-20130625-UNOFFICIAL-i9100.zip as malicious "m-10.1-20130625-UNOFFICIAL-i9100.zip scheint schädlich zu sein."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup, I have seen that too. But I think Chrome does not like copy.com.
Nice rom so far. Gps works as does phone
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
Hello to everyone! I have a question about my Xperia Neo V (Haida). I want to change my ROM (currently AntiBillOS CM10.1) to a more stable and with fewer bugs. I'm tempted to Legacy Xperia by Mike, but I opened this thread to ask an opinion on all ROM based on Android 4.2.2, with strengths and weaknesses. In particular, I am looking for a ROM that is stable, faster and with less bugs as possible, with root permissions and superuser, of course. I also wanted to consider Legacy Xperia CM10.2 by Mike, but I have read that it is still at an embryonic stage. I await your answers.
Sorry for my English. :angel:
Definitely CM10.1 because of lesser bugs. CM10.2 is being fixed but it's laggy at this moment & some of the hardware doesn't work. Hopefully most of bugs will be fixed soon. So I'd suggest you to flash latest CM10.1 by Mike.
Cheers!!
Is it really necessary to create new thread for this..
ak070 said:
Definitely CM10.1 because of lesser bugs. CM10.2 is being fixed but it's laggy at this moment & some of the hardware doesn't work. Hopefully most of bugs will be fixed soon. So I'd suggest you to flash latest CM10.1 by Mike.
Cheers!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks again for your reply. I chose the CM10.1 by Mike as you suggested. Just one question: if I were to upgrade to a future build, can I use the built-CM update?
No you can not update unofficial ROMs through CM Updater in Settings. You have to manually check on respective development thread if an update is available you have to download it & flash it manually.
ak070 said:
No you can not update unofficial ROMs through CM Updater in Settings. You have to manually check on respective development thread if an update is available you have to download it & flash it manually.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So I need to repeat the full-wipe and full apps reinstall process?
pierpo84 said:
So I need to repeat the full-wipe and full apps reinstall process?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No just flash over.. No wipes needed for same version..
deccen90 said:
No just flash over.. No wipes needed for same version..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for reply!