Blur 1.3 or 1.4 oc/uv kernels - Motorola Photon 4G

I originally posted this on jokersax's forum, since that's as close to the problem as I can, but hasn't been any luck there.
http://forum.jokersax.com/discussion/45/photon-1-3-kernels
Does anyone have live links to both the cm7 and blur kernels posted here?
http://www.jokersax.com/developer-pages/jokersax/motorola-photon-kernels/
XDA pointed me here, it seems that these links have been dead for quite a while.
I'm stock rooted, unlocked, I just flashed oleg's blur OC, but wifi is broke on it, which is a deal breaker.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=24875355&postcount=59
So right now I'm looking for a oc/uv kernel with a working wifi stack
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Also playing around with oleg's kernel I noticed that my rear LED Torch/Flash is not working either. Which is also a rather huge deal breaker.
I'm trying my damnedest not to flash another ROM, I'm just trying to eke as much power out of my phones as I can without things breaking on it.

Have you tried this thread? http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1362140 My understanding is that a few of those don't have the wifi modules working but some do.
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium

There are mirrors of the kernels you are wanting at www.motosunfire.com.

Acvice said:
There are mirrors of the kernels you are wanting at www.motosunfire.com.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you kindly.

Related

Is there a half decent rom for this phone?

ive read some of the threads and not been encouraged. basically looking for a 2.2 based rom, no less capability than stock. I mean whats the point in flashing a phone if I cant even use stereo bluetooth? Looking for better processing speed, no bloatware, faster internet speeds, but not losing stock abilitys
gingerbread themes would be a plus
rodimus_prime said:
ive read some of the threads and not been encouraged. basically looking for a 2.2 based rom, no less capability than stock. I mean whats the point in flashing a phone if I cant even use stereo bluetooth? Looking for better processing speed, no bloatware, faster internet speeds, but not losing stock abilitys
gingerbread themes would be a plus
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Adrynalyne's Super Clean 2.9 with one of his EB16 kernels.
rodimus_prime said:
ive read some of the threads and not been encouraged. basically looking for a 2.2 based rom, no less capability than stock. I mean whats the point in flashing a phone if I cant even use stereo bluetooth? Looking for better processing speed, no bloatware, faster internet speeds, but not losing stock abilitys
gingerbread themes would be a plus
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As far as most of us in this forum are concerned its Adrynalyne's Super Clean ROM's here are links to his ROMS and his new kernal.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=983395 ROM
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=995015 Kernal
I have tried just about everything out there and this works much better IMO than anything else, especially stock.
EDIT: You will need to look around in this section for themes that work with the version of rom you use, but there are alot of GB ones in there. http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=722
DaleV said:
As far as most of us in this forum are concerned its Adrynalyne's Super Clean ROM's here are links to his ROMS and his new kernal.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=983395 ROM
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=995015 Kernal
I have tried just about everything out there and this works much better IMO than anything else, especially stock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 I could not agree any more. Oh, and to the OP, just so you know, Bluetooth DOES work on Adynalyne's new kernel, that Dave just linked you to.
Dread This Day said:
+1 I could not agree any more. Oh, and to the OP, just so you know, Bluetooth DOES work on Adynalyne's new kernel, that Dave just linked you to.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dave?? Nice typo..LOL
rodimus_prime said:
faster internet speeds
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ROMs (and kernels for that matter) cannot give you faster internet speeds. The only thing that will give you a faster connection will be a better signal, and the only thing on your phone that can give you a better signal that you can change is the modem. What ROMs and kernels can do is make the connection more consistent, so the connection speed doesn't fluctuate as much, but that is the best you could hope for.
DaleV said:
Dave?? Nice typo..LOL
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HAHA! I'm sorry! DALE* Been a rough day...lol.
Faster internet speeds...go sign up for a 4g plan...
Definitely go for Adrynalyne's Super Clean ROM's, they're awesome, Im running his Superclean 2.9.0 rom right now and I love it.
What threads have you been reading? Im super encouraged everytime I browse through here...
Oh and +1 for superclean
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Hmm I was under the impression that a kernel could give you better net speeds if the default kernel has throttling enabled. Im pretty sure the fascinate fits into this category....
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA Premium App
bobloblaw1 said:
Hmm I was under the impression that a kernel could give you better net speeds if the default kernel has throttling enabled. Im pretty sure the fascinate fits into this category....
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
there is no throttling enabled in the kernel or rom. Any throttling Verizon is going to do is on the network side, and no kernel or rom you flash is going to do anything to fix it. The issue with the stock kernel, at least the Eclair one, was that during periods of high data usage, the kernel drivers weren't coded well and they would easily bog down under load due to the issues and cause heavy fluctuation in your connection speeds. SirGatez fixed the issue in his Eclair kernel, and I'm sure that when the Froyo source is released, or if he gets the i9000 source working, he'll do the same thing again with that. But, there is no throttling or other bandwidth control setup.
im trying to find a guide on how to install this rom suggested but im not seeing many details
rodimus_prime said:
im trying to find a guide on how to install this rom suggested but im not seeing many details
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you don't see many details you need to start reading. This place is saturated. All you need to do is search.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA Premium App
Yukaia said:
Definitely go for Adrynalyne's Super Clean ROM's, they're awesome, Im running his Superclean 2.9.0 rom right now and I love it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All I read about is problems with Superclean... sod, mms
Sent from my rooted froyo Fascinate
rodimus_prime said:
im trying to find a guide on how to install this rom suggested but im not seeing many details
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seriously??? You cant find anything about installing superclean?? Where exactly are you looking?
Sent from my rooted froyo Fascinate
ziggy484 said:
All I read about is problems with Superclean... sod, mms
Sent from my rooted froyo Fascinate
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A rom is, as good as the operator and what that operator may have installed on his or her device. Sod, mms, and clock lag and other issues are not the fault of the rom.
rodimus_prime said:
im trying to find a guide on how to install this rom suggested but im not seeing many details
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=948722
good day.
Another +1 for super clean.
As a further example of how complications are usually the fault of the user..... I was rooted running S.C. 2.9.1 voodoo EB16 Kernal and I starting having restart problems and even a bootloop at one point.... This was not the ROM but a theme I had decided to flash over it. Anything outside of what is provided for you in the Super Clean threads is a gamble.
Currently after returning to stock I am running the same set-up minus the theme and am having no issues. Running smoother and faster than ever.
chopper the dog said:
A rom is, as good as the operator and what that operator may have installed on his or her device. Sod, mms, and clock lag and other issues are not the fault of the rom.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=948722
good day.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so any issues are not the fault of the rom? What planet are you on? Btw, I went for sc 2.9 and it is good so far. Is that because adrynalyn made an awesome rom or because im a good "operator"?
Sent from a Superclean Fascinate
Smooth Operator?
Sent from my blue steel, debloated, battery sucking, froyo lovin, galaxy s ;D

google apps for 2.3.5???? need download link :)

i am currently on phiremod's fusion v1 2.3.5 rom
it said that google apps dont come with it and have to be manually installed and to get it from rom manager. i dont have the paid version of rom manager
anyone have a link to google apps?? thanks in advance
Go on birgertimes trigger 2.3.5 rom he has a link there I believe
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Flash the gapps from cm7
Sent from a phone with android 2.3.5
Save yourself some headache and use the source, not some knockoff. CM7 is what you should really be using.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
I keep wanting to switch from Liberty GB to CM7 for DX but everytime I look at reviews it says camera/camcorder don't work, youtube don't work, & GPS maybe.. That review was from June 17th.. Anybody got a up to date review on that ROM..
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk
jzero88 said:
Save yourself some headache and use the source, not some knockoff. CM7 is what you should really be using.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nothing wrong with "plain CM7", but Birgertime's version is hardly a knockoff. If it weren't for him, we'd still be using mute/unmute on calls in CM7 and GPS would still not work. Many of his fixes have been rolled back into the official CM7 for Vibrant.
YvesSaintYuki said:
I keep wanting to switch from Liberty GB to CM7 for DX but everytime I look at reviews it says camera/camcorder don't work, youtube don't work, & GPS maybe.. That review was from June 17th.. Anybody got a up to date review on that ROM..
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
check cyanognemod.com forums for the device, and see what people are saying about it.
however, since you posted this in the vibrant themes and apps section your chances of getting an answer go down... significantly
if you really want to you can go through the change log http://cm-nightlies.appspot.com/?device=cdma_shadow
or go through all of the cdma_shadow commits on gerrit http://review.cyanogenmod.com/#q,st...yanogenMod/android_device_motorola_shadow,n,z
lotherius said:
Nothing wrong with "plain CM7", but Birgertime's version is hardly a knockoff. If it weren't for him, we'd still be using mute/unmute on calls in CM7 and GPS would still not work. Many of his fixes have been rolled back into the official CM7 for Vibrant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
actually the gps fix was done by karl hegbloom, Roman pulled the commit and put it into his build after Atin passed on it (there is more to the story and some more tweaking was done by all parties)
but here is the link for gapps
http://goo-inside.me/gapps/gapps-gb-20110613-signed.zip
lotherius said:
Nothing wrong with "plain CM7", but Birgertime's version is hardly a knockoff. If it weren't for him, we'd still be using mute/unmute on calls in CM7 and GPS would still not work. Many of his fixes have been rolled back into the official CM7 for Vibrant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No intention of knocking any of the other Dev's here at all. In most cases that "I've" seen, ROMS built off of CM7 which already has issues of its own, tend to have more issues than not. I haven't tried any other GB ROM other than CM7 so I don't have any experience with them. I do know CM7 has worked perfectly for me so far, and I do know most of the problems encountered are from the end users.
Cheers
EDIT: Is phiremod even Birgertime's ROM? It's also built off of CM7 #74.
jzero88 said:
No intention of knocking any of the other Dev's here at all. In most cases that "I've" seen, ROMS built off of CM7 which already has issues of its own, tend to have more issues than not. I haven't tried any other GB ROM other than CM7 so I don't have any experience with them. I do know CM7 has worked perfectly for me so far, and I do know most of the problems encountered are from the end users.
Cheers
EDIT: Is phiremod even Birgertime's ROM? It's also built off of CM7 #74.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
there is a phiremod based of GB in rootzwiki

Quad with ziggy kernel

I have been playing with some kernels. This is what can be obtained eith ziggy's kernel. And to think, until recently, je didn't even have a 3D. If the score is not clear it is 4447
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
EDIT: My bad, Mods, please move this to the Eternity thread in the CDMA development forum. Sorry, and thanks!
what is your current setup?rom, mods?, clock speed and governor?also, ive gotten great scores with ziggy's kernel as well but had a known issue of wake call ( where the phone is asleep and when someone would call, the phone screen would be black and not wakeup). This is a known issue and Virus has mentioned its kernel related. Virus has gotten Ziggy a Evo 3D, so hopefully he can correct this issue as his kernel is by far the best performing and battery life Ive tested.
Just a friendly reminder that this doesn't really belong here, it's more fitting in general, or even apps/themes.
That having been said, Ziggy's kernels were always really good on the OG 4g, but I have had nothing but problems with them on the Evo3D. I know he recently got the Evo so hopefully they'll improve, but even with the latest I'm getting issues with reboots, lockups (those are with it clocked to 1188, not OC'ed at all for testing purposes), and also the infamous 'unable to wake the screen on incoming call'. In other kernels that's a sign that 2 way recording is enabled, but I don't believe Ziggy's have that functionality.
I've also been able to achieve 4300/4400+ with Warm 2.3 and BCBlend 0.3.
How come Ziggy doesnt have his own thread with his kernels. Does he only want it on ViperRom or is there somewhere other than XDA where he has them.
fifedogg said:
How come Ziggy doesnt have his own thread with his kernels. Does he only want it on ViperRom or is there somewhere other than XDA where he has them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
His kernels are not for ViperROM. You'll find them on Synergy, and Eternity.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
DDiaz007 said:
His kernels are not for ViperROM. You'll find them on Synergy, and Eternity.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I meant to say Synergy. I was curious why he doesnt have his own thread.
fifedogg said:
I meant to say Synergy. I was curious why he doesnt have his own thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't no, he did have a thread on the Evo 4G forums, but he stopped supporting it I think. He does have his own site for his kernels.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
shortyboy said:
what is your current setup?rom, mods?, clock speed and governor?also, ive gotten great scores with ziggy's kernel as well but had a known issue of wake call ( where the phone is asleep and when someone would call, the phone screen would be black and not wakeup). This is a known issue and Virus has mentioned its kernel related. Virus has gotten Ziggy a Evo 3D, so hopefully he can correct this issue as his kernel is by far the best performing and battery life Ive tested.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Eternity,1.4 w/ziggy417. No mods, themes or whatever. CPU at 1.7 set on demand. Funny thing is that I have never seen the wake call issue at all. Go figger.
smw6180 said:
Just a friendly reminder that this doesn't really belong here, it's more fitting in general, or even apps/themes.
That having been said, Ziggy's kernels were always really good on the OG 4g, but I have had nothing but problems with them on the Evo3D. I know he recently got the Evo so hopefully they'll improve, but even with the latest I'm getting issues with reboots, lockups (those are with it clocked to 1188, not OC'ed at all for testing purposes), and also the infamous 'unable to wake the screen on incoming call'. In other kernels that's a sign that 2 way recording is enabled, but I don't believe Ziggy's have that functionality.
I've also been able to achieve 4300/4400+ with Warm 2.3 and BCBlend 0.3.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
See, the only issue I have ever had was my screen going whacky as if though someone was pushing buttons all over the place. I re-applied he ROM over my existing setup and everything has been fine since then. Now, if we coold only find the common denominator.
alexv59 said:
See, the only issue I have ever had was my screen going whacky as if though someone was pushing buttons all over the place. I re-applied he ROM over my existing setup and everything has been fine since then. Now, if we coold only find the common denominator.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well technically the common denominator is Ziggy's kernels. I've had identical problems with them on multiple ROM's and two different Evo3D's.
smw6180 said:
Well technically the common denominator is Ziggy's kernels. I've had identical problems with them on multiple ROM's and two different Evo3D's.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL and for me his kernels have been the best and most stable.
alexv59 said:
I have been playing with some kernels. This is what can be obtained eith ziggy's kernel. And to think, until recently, je didn't even have a 3D. If the score is not clear it is 4447
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
EDIT: My bad, Mods, please move this to the Eternity thread in the CDMA development forum. Sorry, and thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try and do your runs on the Free version of Quadrant. I always get quite a bit higher on the paid version.
I put some screenshots in my post so you can see what the ziggy kernel is doing for me on Synergy
Here is my best quadrant so far. 4500+
Cf bench
Antutu
best linpack only 105 though. No pictures of that.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
I love the kernal, it's one of the best out there right now. I'm on eternity 1.4.1 1.7oc ondemand. It's a beast
Can someone post this kernel for me.
Evo 3D in full Affect

[Q] Is CM7 Ready Yet?

Hey guys,
I'm no babby to installing beta software or flashing or any of this business. However, I'm just wondering if CM7 is ready for so-called "prime time" on the Atrix yet. I don't really care about the fingerprint sensor or webtop at all. Sans those two things how is everything else working on there these days? How is battery life and overall system stability?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1257574
Sent from my CM860
From my experience its great. Battery life is identical to a blur rom, and performance is very good. Also no stability issues that I've seen.
It's my daily driver. Best experience on the Atrix yet for me. Battery life is great. I usually get through the whole day. now that it's merged it should just get better and better. I'd suggest it.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Just do it.... it's technically out of beta now.
Only things that don't work:
- Finger Print Scanner
- Webtop
- Horizontal HDMI Mirroring
- Dock Audio
As far as battery goes, that's pretty much subjective from user to user... also depends with kernel you decide to run... if you want good battery life on CM7, might want to try Faux's enhanced stock kernel & add some undervolting.
When you say, dock audio, does this just mean the audio cable that splits off of the power cable doesn't work? Does Bluetooth audio still works when it's the car dock?
GatorRuss said:
When you say, dock audio, does this just mean the audio cable that splits off of the power cable doesn't work? Does Bluetooth audio still works when it's the car dock?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://modmymobile.com/forums/661-m...xp-cyanogenmod-7-1-atrix-b-n.html#post4099387
Might want to ask that in the CM7 thread.
Swiftks said:
Just do it.... it's technically out of beta now.
Only things that don't work:
- Finger Print Scanner
- Webtop
- Horizontal HDMI Mirroring
- Dock Audio
As far as battery goes, that's pretty much subjective from user to user... also depends with kernel you decide to run... if you want good battery life on CM7, might want to try Faux's enhanced stock kernel & add some undervolting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
may be a dumb request but can you or anyone explain uv to me and maybe how to do it i know use setcpu or antutu but not sure what im doing thanks for any help im using enhanced stock but wld like to try the others 2 just figured they would need uv
This CM7 is pretty beastie so far. Great battery. Faux's 1.45ghz kernel. Stock I used to have to charge about 9pm @ 25%. Nowits still about 45%. Of course your mileage may vary......
As to the post above me, do you even use Google?
http://www.google.com/m?gl=us&sourc...htf=&his=&maction=&q=undervolt+android&flip=0
http://www.google.com/m?devlocsessi...=&htf=&his=&maction=&q=undervolt+atrix&flip=0
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=505419
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
fleurdelisxliv said:
may be a dumb request but can you or anyone explain uv to me and maybe how to do it i know use setcpu or antutu but not sure what im doing thanks for any help im using enhanced stock but wld like to try the others 2 just figured they would need uv
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Theres a thread in the theme section about setcpu only a few days old that has good undervolting info.... sorry, can't link on mobile.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Thanks guys. I went ahead and flashed it and loving it so far!
I'm glad you flashed it! I was really hesitant to leave the safe, stable world of deblurred roms and venture into fingerprint-scanner-less world of CM7. However, with it out of Beta I finally took the plunge and it opened up a whole new world to me. Now having taken the red pill, I can never go back.
CM7 is without a doubt the most powerful rom available. It is so good that it makes me hesitation regarding lack of fingerprint scanner silly.
bzmotoninja83 said:
This CM7 is pretty beastie so far. Great battery. Faux's 1.45ghz kernel. Stock I used to have to charge about 9pm @ 25%. Nowits still about 45%. Of course your mileage may vary......
As to the post above me, do you even use Google?
http://www.google.com/m?gl=us&sourc...htf=&his=&maction=&q=undervolt+android&flip=0
http://www.google.com/m?devlocsessi...=&htf=&his=&maction=&q=undervolt+atrix&flip=0
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=505419
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks master of google
I flashed the new version and i dont know what is happening but mine is too slow to scroll apps, change screen, etc. Does anyone here is happening samething?
I'm using CM7 and am blown away by the speed,features, and how clean it is.
There naturally are quirks, as its still in beta. The only major issue I've had is lack of ability to control permissions.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
I had similar issues. I think they're related to the cooked in ADW Launcher. I just replaced it with Launcher Pro, and my homescreen and app drawer scroll smoothly and quickly.
As much as I love CyanogenMod its a no go for me.
The only reason I use the Atrix 4G and consider it a superb smartphone is because on Webtop and Fingerprint Scanner. Whitout those two key things, I might have moved to something else like the SGS2.
Too bad those features are not priorities for CyanogenMod devs I presume.
Cheers
Sent from my Atrix using Tapatalk
Rayan said:
As much as I love CyanogenMod its a no go for me.
The only reason I use the Atrix 4G and consider it a superb smartphone is because on Webtop and Fingerprint Scanner. Whitout those two key things, I might have moved to something else like the SGS2.
Too bad those features are not priorities for CyanogenMod devs I presume.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not to sound abrasive, but it has nothing to do with priorities.You should read up on what they are facing with those two things.
And for the record, about that sgs2...
tapatalk.com/mu/62b1ab7e-2202-f2a7.jpg
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
xhazk said:
Not to sound abrasive, but it has nothing to do with priorities.You should read up on what they are facing with those two things.
And for the record, about that sgs2...
tapatalk.com/mu/62b1ab7e-2202-f2a7.jpg
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome scores!
But unfortunately that doesn't help with Webtop and Fingerprint Scanner problem... :/
But I'm glad to see those scores nonetheless!
Thank you for sharing that!
Cheers!
Sent from my Atrix using Tapatalk
Rayan said:
Awesome scores!
But unfortunately that doesn't help with Webtop and Fingerprint Scanner problem... :/
But I'm glad to see those scores nonetheless!
Thank you for sharing that!
Cheers!
Sent from my Atrix using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why don't you use Aura or Alien or any of the other custom ROMs that DO have those features? They're still way faster and leaner than the stock moto builds.

An AOSP ROM?

Well, all the Sense 4 ROMs drain my battery like its nobody's business, and personally I really don't seem to like Sense anymore. I know that newtoroot came out with an AOSP rom awhile back in like February, but has anyone been working on one since? And I know people "claim" to have AOSP roms but all of them are still using sense's SystemUI, so im looking for a FULL AOSP rom. thanks to anyone who can help.
zZDave_Stud said:
Well, all the Sense 4 ROMs drain my battery like its nobody's business, and personally I really don't seem to like Sense anymore. I know that newtoroot came out with an AOSP rom awhile back in like February, but has anyone been working on one since? And I know people "claim" to have AOSP roms but all of them are still using sense's SystemUI, so im looking for a FULL AOSP rom. thanks to anyone who can help.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since this is a pretty touchy subject... I'll handle it.
We do not have full functioning AOSP roms. The rezound has very difficult tech to reverse engineer. The AOSP roms that do exist all have no data, text, or call capability. Not even wifi. A few have tried to work on getting AOSP over but either stopped in the hopes that the ICS OTA stuff will help or they just dumped the rezound completely. I just hope you don't get flamed.
What hurts the rezound, was that everyone was expecting to get it and then immediately switch to ICS so the gingerbread development lacked a lot. And leaks don't really help us at all as far as ICS goes. Here we are 8 months after the debut of ICS and we are still left out in the cold.
There are a few people still trying to make AOSP happen, but for now, senseless is as close as you'll get.
bukithd said:
Since this is a pretty touchy subject... I'll handle it.
We do not have full functioning AOSP roms. The rezound has very difficult tech to reverse engineer. The AOSP roms that do exist all have no data, text, or call capability. Not even wifi. A few have tried to work on getting AOSP over but either stopped in the hopes that the ICS OTA stuff will help or they just dumped the rezound completely. I just hope you don't get flamed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not gonna get flamed. But newtoroots AOSP Rom was so close to perfect, ril worked, everything ran perfectly, except for a few bugs here and there. I would love if some awesome dev out there would take that Rom, fix it up, and put it on the forums. That's my two cents. Thanks for the feedback man.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
zZDave_Stud said:
I'm not gonna get flamed. But newtoroots AOSP Rom was so close to perfect, ril worked, everything ran perfectly, except for a few bugs here and there. I would love if some awesome dev out there would take that Rom, fix it up, and put it on the forums. That's my two cents. Thanks for the feedback man.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That wasn't aosp brohan. I reiterate, no aosp, only SENSELESS
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
I know but it actually used an AOSP SystemUI which is all that I really want. I can post pics if necessary (though it'll be hard on my phone lol)
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Let's not flame this guy. Let's turn this into a productive thread about AOSP even though we have scattered comments about AOSP/AOKP/CM in random threads.
Chad is working on RIL issues in his upcoming kernel. Chad is an extremely busy student so don't expect anything soon although he has gotten calls/sms/1x data working.
We really don't have an updated version of CM9 or AOKP but since we don't have data for them yet, there is no reason to make a ROM bot for them automatically compiling roms nightly.
OK now let's get productive. We have GB source. I don't understand why we don't have a CM7 rom yet. Well, I didn't understand why until I tried do compile/port one myself. I am not an expert at compiling from source especially when our device isn't officially supported but my port won't boot past the splash screen. I am thinking about putting the port up in the dev section and turning it into a community project. I have tried the Demonizing AOSP kernel and I have compiled multiple CM7 kernels from source but still no booting.
I know CM7 is GB based but it's better than nothing at least until we get ICS source.
Quada said:
Let's not flame this guy. Let's turn this into a productive thread about AOSP even though we have scattered comments about AOSP/AOKP/CM in random threads.
Chad is working on RIL issues in his upcoming kernel. Chad is an extremely busy student so don't expect anything soon although he has gotten calls/sms/1x data working.
We really don't have an updated version of CM9 or AOKP but since we don't have data for them yet, there is no reason to make a ROM bot for them automatically compiling roms nightly.
OK now let's get productive. We have GB source. I don't understand why we don't have a CM7 rom yet. Well, I didn't understand why until I tried do compile/port one myself. I am not an expert at compiling from source especially when our device isn't officially supported but my port won't boot past the splash screen. I am thinking about putting the port up in the dev section and turning it into a community project. I have tried the Demonizing AOSP kernel and I have compiled multiple CM7 kernels from source but still no booting.
I know CM7 is GB based but it's better than nothing at least until we get ICS source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fix RIL would still be necessary for CM7 as it is for CM9. So given our most recent leaks/RUUs, makes since to focus on one vs. The other... Gingerbread is ooooooold
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
Quada said:
Let's not flame this guy. Let's turn this into a productive thread about AOSP even though we have scattered comments about AOSP/AOKP/CM in random threads.
Chad is working on RIL issues in his upcoming kernel. Chad is an extremely busy student so don't expect anything soon although he has gotten calls/sms/1x data working.
We really don't have an updated version of CM9 or AOKP but since we don't have data for them yet, there is no reason to make a ROM bot for them automatically compiling roms nightly.
OK now let's get productive. We have GB source. I don't understand why we don't have a CM7 rom yet. Well, I didn't understand why until I tried do compile/port one myself. I am not an expert at compiling from source especially when our device isn't officially supported but my port won't boot past the splash screen. I am thinking about putting the port up in the dev section and turning it into a community project. I have tried the Demonizing AOSP kernel and I have compiled multiple CM7 kernels from source but still no booting.
I know CM7 is GB based but it's better than nothing at least until we get ICS source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the feedback man. And goodluck on your AOSP GB Rom man. And one quick question, (hope I don't sound like a noon) umm, who exactly is chad?
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Quada said:
Let's not flame this guy. Let's turn this into a productive thread about AOSP even though we have scattered comments about AOSP/AOKP/CM in random threads.
Chad is working on RIL issues in his upcoming kernel. Chad is an extremely busy student so don't expect anything soon although he has gotten calls/sms/1x data working.
We really don't have an updated version of CM9 or AOKP but since we don't have data for them yet, there is no reason to make a ROM bot for them automatically compiling roms nightly.
OK now let's get productive. We have GB source. I don't understand why we don't have a CM7 rom yet. Well, I didn't understand why until I tried do compile/port one myself. I am not an expert at compiling from source especially when our device isn't officially supported but my port won't boot past the splash screen. I am thinking about putting the port up in the dev section and turning it into a community project. I have tried the Demonizing AOSP kernel and I have compiled multiple CM7 kernels from source but still no booting.
I know CM7 is GB based but it's better than nothing at least until we get ICS source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's interesting. I always just assumed everyone was so focused on ICS/CM9 that they just never bothered with CM7. I would probably use CM7 over our current crop of ICS choices to be honest.
zZDave_Stud said:
Thanks for the feedback man. And goodluck on your AOSP GB Rom man. And one quick question, (hope I don't sound like a noon) umm, who exactly is chad?
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1437198&page=70 <<<< chad. Try to refrain from bugging him though, like I said, he is very busy.
fo0you said:
Fix RIL would still be necessary for CM7 as it is for CM9. So given our most recent leaks/RUUs, makes since to focus on one vs. The other... Gingerbread is ooooooold
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes but it would be much much easier to fix because we has source. Chad even said that 99% of the issues is just rearranging libraries in the kernel.
dogswind said:
That's interesting. I always just assumed everyone was so focused on ICS/CM9 that they just never bothered with CM7. I would probably use CM7 over our current crop of ICS choices to be honest.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would use CM7 over ICS sense as well. I believe a lot of users on here would feel the same.
Quada said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1437198&page=70 <<<< chad. Try to refrain from bugging him though, like I said, he is very busy.
Yes but it would be much much easier to fix because we has source. Chad even said that 99% of the issues is just rearranging libraries in the kernel.
I would use CM7 over ICS sense as well. I believe a lot of users on here would feel the same.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright thanks for letting me know who he was. So now, basically, Chads upcoming kernel will make all current AOSP roms a daily driver (with ril working)? Please tell me if this is incorrect. If its not then I'm actually kind of excited!
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Quada said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1437198&page=70 <<<< chad. Try to refrain from bugging him though, like I said, he is very busy.
Yes but it would be much much easier to fix because we has source. Chad even said that 99% of the issues is just rearranging libraries in the kernel.
I would use CM7 over ICS sense as well. I believe a lot of users on here would feel the same.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yesss I'd love to have a cm7 . I actually just downgraded back to gb firmware
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
zZDave_Stud said:
Alright thanks for letting me know who he was. So now, basically, Chads upcoming kernel will make all current AOSP roms a daily driver (with ril working)? Please tell me if this is incorrect. If its not then I'm actually kind of excited!
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no guarantee of him getting 3g/4g data working, but if he does then ICS AOSP roms will become a reality.
Quada said:
There is no guarantee of him getting 3g/4g data working, but if he does then ICS AOSP roms will become a reality.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright awesome, thanks for the replies everyone, I can't wait for chad's kernel. And I believe that atm I would use CM7 over the assortment of ics roms we have as well.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
zZDave_Stud said:
Alright thanks for letting me know who he was. So now, basically, Chads upcoming kernel will make all current AOSP roms a daily driver (with ril working)? Please tell me if this is incorrect. If its not then I'm actually kind of excited!
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't hold my breath. Bottom line is that there has been no updates released to the "public" in a couple of months, just word of mouth that they have it working, except for a few bugs.
Quada said:
Let's not flame this guy. Let's turn this into a productive thread about AOSP even though we have scattered comments about AOSP/AOKP/CM in random threads.
Chad is working on RIL issues in his upcoming kernel. Chad is an extremely busy student so don't expect anything soon although he has gotten calls/sms/1x data working.
We really don't have an updated version of CM9 or AOKP but since we don't have data for them yet, there is no reason to make a ROM bot for them automatically compiling roms nightly.
OK now let's get productive. We have GB source. I don't understand why we don't have a CM7 rom yet. Well, I didn't understand why until I tried do compile/port one myself. I am not an expert at compiling from source especially when our device isn't officially supported but my port won't boot past the splash screen. I am thinking about putting the port up in the dev section and turning it into a community project. I have tried the Demonizing AOSP kernel and I have compiled multiple CM7 kernels from source but still no booting.
I know CM7 is GB based but it's better than nothing at least until we get ICS source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think making it a community rom is a pretty good idea.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
zZDave_Stud said:
I know but it actually used an AOSP SystemUI which is all that I really want. I can post pics if necessary (though it'll be hard on my phone lol)
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If that's all you really need then use Slim or CleanRom DE. Slim especially has pretty much all of Sense stripped away either is worlds better for battery life.
Chad is doing what protekk couldnt do.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
Newt is currently working on aokp. Says he has calls and texts working so far and next step is data.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2

Categories

Resources