hi,
i'm new on jelly bean (upgraded from ice cream sandwitch this night), and i have a little problem.
when i buy a app, i make a backup copy (manually) in order to not have to remember my installed apps
when i wipe.
but since JB, all my new apps are installed in /data/app-asec and the format is .asec
a possibility to convert into .apk or is possible to backup the .asec and reinstall from the .asec file?
thank's
bartito said:
hi,
i'm new on jelly bean (upgraded from ice cream sandwitch this night), and i have a little problem.
when i buy a app, i make a backup copy (manually) in order to not have to remember my installed apps
when i wipe.
but since JB, all my new apps are installed in /data/app-asec and the format is .asec
a possibility to convert into .apk or is possible to backup the .asec and reinstall from the .asec file?
thank's
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am also having the same problem as yours. I usually manually pull .apk from data/app and keep it safely in PC. But now, every purchased app is sitting in data/app-asec with .asec extension encrpyted package, except a free app is still lying peacefully in data/app. This structure changed because of JB update ( every app is only in data/app for ICS ). Only method I came up with is using Ti-Backup and copy .apk out from backup folder.
However, I am still appreciated with any other solution to due with this encrypted install package. ( Since I prefer to pull .apk file manaully as usual ) :good:
Sounds like you are purchasing apps then making a copy in order to refund the app while keeping a copy. This is frowned upon here on XDA and is considered warez. Your thread will be reported to a moderator now.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Mattix724 said:
Sounds like you are purchasing apps then making a copy in order to refund the app while keeping a copy. This is frowned upon here on XDA and is considered warez. Your thread will be reported to a moderator now.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
NO!
I'm developer, and I buy all my apps!
I save a backup of all my apps in order to don't have to re-download every time I make a wipe.
No more than do!
Mattix724 said:
Sounds like you are purchasing apps then making a copy in order to refund the app while keeping a copy. This is frowned upon here on XDA and is considered warez. Your thread will be reported to a moderator now.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No it's not warez so back. They ud nothing wrong with backing up their apks. No one even mentioned warez so stop jumping into conclusions. Report the thread, its not gonna get any ware.
On topic: actually never thought of that idea to back up. Thanks op but I can see why Google is doing this, I think they changed it because of people who upload their apks online. It is a sheve how some people have to ruin it for others
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
We'll leave it up to the moderator to decide whether this thread should stay open. You personally might not be doing this to get free apps but other members might see this as another way to get around this in order to obtain free apps.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Mattix724 said:
We'll leave it up to the moderator to decide whether this thread should stay open. You personally might not be doing this to get free apps but other members might see this as another way to get around this in order to obtain free apps.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I completely agree with you. Like I said Google made a good decision doing this. But the op didn't intend it for that reason.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Mattix724 said:
Sounds like you are purchasing apps then making a copy in order to refund the app while keeping a copy. This is frowned upon here on XDA and is considered warez. Your thread will be reported to a moderator now.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, it is not what you are thinking. He just intended to keep backup and restore them back in case apps are not working properly. For me, I have own 5-6 Android devices and I don't want to log in Google account in every device to download apps. So I just use only one device to download them and share to the rest of mine.
By the way, I'm also a dev. and I will not do something like that surely! I know how much pain is in developing one app.
On topic : .asec is needed to be decrypted back to .apk. Someone knows how ?
GoLfWRC said:
No, it is not what you are thinking. He just intended to keep backup and restore them back in case apps are not working properly. For me, I have own 5-6 Android devices and I don't want to log in Google account in every device to download apps. So I just use only one device to download them and share to the rest of mine.
By the way, I'm also a dev. and I will not do something like that surely! I know how much pain is in developing one app.
On topic : .asec is needed to be decrypted back to .apk. Someone knows how ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm wondering the same thing. I want to decompile some paid apps to support the multi windows feature on the note 2.
Now, I have found those paid apps hidden in mnt/asec. Not sure about if it is encrypted with a device keycode but you may give it a try though. Hope this help.
Mattix724 said:
We'll leave it up to the moderator to decide whether this thread should stay open. You personally might not be doing this to get free apps but other members might see this as another way to get around this in order to obtain free apps.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And how so, pray tell ?
I'm also in the same predicament as the OP, and i consider Google's move in JB as a blatant denial of EU (and especially french) law, which clearly states that every individual who legally purchases an app (or any other cultural "product", insofar as they can be called this way) has a (almost) god-given RIGHT to make a backup copy for safekeeping.. And it is especially infuriating considering that google wouldn't even fix their stupid "play store" app so it'd display the list of all purchased apps (as it used to do in the pre-ICS market app), making any new ROM-install a living nightmare when it comes to remembering all the apps you ****ing PAID FOR in the first place !!!
And why would you people report someone who asks such a question, automatically condemning him on no tangible grounds, making yourself the judge, jury and executioner in the process ??? it is especially stupid from you, considering that using this way to get free apps is a no-go, since the play store automatically recognizes if you purchased an app and if you didn't, it denies you any updates to the said app... You'd have to be a ****ing retard to opt for such an option, and I trust that (most) XDA members are way smarter than this (with the exception of the despicable people who rat out others on no justifiable grounds, that is)...
Are you an app-developer, or someone who actually has an interest to defend in this deal ? Your "senior member' status tells me you ain't, and my personal intuition tells me that you're no more than a lambda user who (unlike me) has probably never written down a single line of code in his whole life, nothing more than an (almost) "lamer", as we used to call them in the good old Amiga/AtariST days when I first learned programming in 68K assembler... Nothing wrong with that, except that it makes your opinion on this whole issue void of any credit, much less attention...
"Word to the wise" (and actually the easiest, most surefire way of living a long, healthy and troublefree life) : unless you have some personal interest to defend in the process, mind your own f-ing business, you nosy basterds !!
Ratting out on others is bad practice, and an recipe for trouble... Had you done this to me IRL, it would have guaranteed you a whacking 500g of very bony meat directly from my right arm right across your ugly mug.. And you even might have considered yourself as lucky at that, because I know a few very unfriendly people who for much less than this would actually have gone so far as to 'suicide' you with 2 or 3 bullets to the head, and your sorry remains would only have been discovered 30 or 40 years from now, in the cement foundations of a building undergoing demolition...
</flame off>
(My apologies to any people who might have felt offended by my words, but I can't help it, I ****ing hate delators... They're the first step to most of the horrors that my (and many other european) country has had to live in its darkest hours, sometime during the mid-20th century -during WW2, for the most ill-understanding of whoever might be reading this... Those scars never heal, they can only fade out very slowly. :s)
Many thanks to GoLfWRC a couple apps that I have updatedand for some reason wouldn't update on my ouya. Thanks again
Hi
i love xda
Query
So finally there is no solution??
what if i just want to restore my own app stored in asec folder after a ROM upgrade?
i put the files in .android_secure folder but it does nothing
Any help will be appreciated !!
Thanks
Interesting topic.
As I release a mod of a MIUI ROM weekly I asked myself some of the questions mentioned here.
MIUI system backup tool that comes with the ROM is of course not able to backup the ASEC folder stuff.
So users can backup the entire system (all settings, theme stuff, apps, contacts etc.) but not the encrypted paid apps.
Annoying thing. I wonder if it would be illegal to build a workaround, and if it is implementable somehow.
.asec files are actually little images mounted in /mnt/asec/. You can find a folder for each app there. And the pkg.apk in that folder is what you need. Other things in that folder are extracted from the apk.
Related
Hey everybody!
Last time I gave my new s2 to my girlfriend, she installed an strange app from the market called pesoguin sakura dance (free) (should be on top if you search "tamagotchi" - it was surely the last time i handed it over to her haha).
Reading a comment like "damaged my phone" about the app unsettled me a bit and leads me to the question, if an app from the market could damage my/a phone irreparable?
I tested that app with lookout and didn't find anything. If you look on over 260 averaged 4 stars ratings and 50 - 250 000 downloads you shouln't think that there's something wrong. But, as i said, there's that comment; and i heard from another guy that there could be apps, which change the os of a phone.
Am I too careful and there's nothing (with this app) that should upset me or are there apps which do sth without me realizing anything.
Thanks.
May I ask what your previous phone was?
stoney73 said:
May I ask what your previous phone was?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
May I ask what your previous car was?
any serious and helpfull comments?
Dunno! Hoping to get some answers
rkath. said:
any serious and helpfull comments?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Reason being it's a pretty stupid question
Unless the app *gets* (by that I mean, you approve) root access, it ain't screwing anything up...
It's always a good practise to read over the permissions the app requires and ask yourself "Does it really need these?"
Btw... please uninstall Lookout...
hmm..stupid question, ya?
so i heard sth. what you obviously didnt hear, namely that there are definetly malicious apps which get root-access without me approving that.
and please get me in the enjoyment of your knowledge why i shouldnt use lookout
Micksta said:
Reason being it's a pretty stupid question
Unless the app *gets* (by that I mean, you approve) root access, it ain't screwing anything up...
It's always a good practise to read over the permissions the app requires and ask yourself "Does it really need these?"
Btw... please uninstall Lookout...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
come on it wasnt stupid
made me think about those viruses on the market place
rkath. said:
hmm..stupid question, ya?
so i heard sth. what you obviously didnt hear, namely that there are definetly malicious apps which get root-access without me approving that.
and please get me in the enjoyment of your knowledge why i shouldnt use lookout
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pretty sure Superuser would pop-up with any request for root access, don't think there is a way around that...
I am against running an Anti-Virus/Malware client on my phone. IMO it's a stupid idea. I don't want to get in an argument, if you want to run Lookout or similar apps, I'm not going to stop you. It's like the 'why use a Task Manager/App-Killer' argument...
Micksta said:
Pretty sure Superuser would pop-up with any request for root access, don't think there is a way around that...
I am against running an Anti-Virus/Malware client on my phone. IMO it's a stupid idea. I don't want to get in an argument, if you want to run Lookout or similar apps, I'm not going to stop you. It's like the 'why use a Task Manager/App-Killer' argument...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i dont think that he has asked a stupid question, asked people if they know of any dangerous apps isnt a bad question. you say su would pop up if it was going to be something bad, but you assume he is rooted
I feel a valid concern has been raised in the OP.
The apps available in the marketplace should be vetted but as we know its not.
after rooting the phone...it more or less becomes like the home PC.
personally i download apps only from big corporations...but i do understand most ppl like to try out new & tempting stuff on their phones...
since i access lots of personal accounts from my phone, i keep away from apps which comes from sources i havent heard before...
ignorance is bliss at times...
Crucio_ said:
i dont think that he has asked a stupid question, asked people if they know of any dangerous apps isnt a bad question. you say su would pop up if it was going to be something bad, but you assume he is rooted
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think he asked a stupid question either. I have found a few malicious apps in the Market that download unwanted garbage to your phone. It surprises me that the Market does not screen out such apps before posting.
That said, I think he definitely needs a new girlfriend.
Sent from Galaxy Tab with XDA app
Robin M said:
That said, I think he definitely needs a new girlfriend.
Sent from Galaxy Tab with XDA app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hahaha...no she's cute and no..she isn't someone whos playing tamagotchi stuff
b2t. should i be in sorrow after downloaded pesoguin sakura dance? the developer artsplanet inc isnt that small..
btw. my phone is rooted.
thanks in advance!
nobody that can calm me? :/
Micksta said:
Pretty sure Superuser would pop-up with any request for root access, don't think there is a way around that...
I am against running an Anti-Virus/Malware client on my phone. IMO it's a stupid idea. I don't want to get in an argument, if you want to run Lookout or similar apps, I'm not going to stop you. It's like the 'why use a Task Manager/App-Killer' argument...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can get round the superuser popup on many phones... So it's not enough to rely on that alone.
I suggest you do run a reliable AV program if you are at all concerned
Btw, few apps are likely to cause serious harm.
If something gets root, in theory it can cause a lot of damage, but normally they aim to quietly install other files without you knowing.
So if you want to start clean, remove and wipe your sd, clear all app data, and reflash the latest rom via odin or kies
If an app had root, it could have modified your system partition, so the reflash matters.
But in theory, someone could delete everything from your phone, or brick it (on some devices), though I am not aware of any such apps
yes there are very dangerous apps in Android Market like this one for example Albanian Keyboard wich is steals all u data like a key logger and no one in there are doing anything to ban or remove that crap
qwerty warrior said:
May I ask what your previous car was?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
of course you can.
so what do you think about that pesoguin sakura dance app (free)?
rkath. said:
so what do you think about that pesoguin sakura dance app (free)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Shouldn't be that problematic especially as most security holes are patched in gingerbread. AFAIK the most viruses are only able to harm FroYo and lower OS'es.
hey people,
i have been reading as of late that cyber crime has been increasingly growing on smartphones. should i install AV protection on my atrix is the question.
what is your opinion?
No.
As long you don't download warez apps - you are safe.
Something I've been wondering about is video files. I get a lot of video files from questionable places and I'm just wondering if these can ever contain anything malicious. Any thoughts?
I use Lookout, if you ever install third party or non-Market apps I would recommend it, although in 14+mo I have only found one app it flagged as malicious as I was trying to install it.
It's a great question to ask.
All my apps come from the Android Market, but I browse the net a lot.
Most of it is normal websites, but I still wonder if and when it will become "necessary". (then again there's always the emails)
Especially since Android is growing, and not all hackers are friendly...
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Coming from CrackBerry site where everyone touts BB security and thinks there is someone on every street corner just waiting to hack your phone.. I've wondered this as well. However.. I've yet to read of anyone ever having their financials stolen due to cellphone hackery. Of course.. anything's possible.. but I think as long as your smart about WHAT your downloading and from where.. there shouldn't be any issues. Most of the Trojans out there come direct from China and aren't being plagued in our Market.. yet. At least Google's good about yanking apps that are deemed malicious when they do discover them.
^ The only one that really caught my attention was the wallpaper malware incident a while back.
I'm pretty good at trying to figure out why an app needs permissions, but the average user doesn't care which IMO is kinda scary...
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
Android security problems are GREEEEEATLY exaggerated. When the media finds one malware app, they start spreading the news all over the internet.
Though, in 99% of cases such app isn't even on the Android market.
Well guess what? Same goes for iPhone - if you jailbreak and install an app outside the iTunes market that contains malware - you get screwed.
So yeah, the only way to get malware is by installing something from an untrustworthy source.
Additionally, you can use an app like Permissions Denied to monitor / retract permissions from untrustworthy apps.... or better yet - just don't install such apps in the first place. There are always alternatives for everything.
I've known for some time that the app permissions and data about us being sent to companies via our 'free' apps has always been scandelous. If you don't know about this, there are countless studies by reputable organisations, simply google it.
Like many of us here, I've owned a number of hot Xperia phones, and a few days ago got a new one! But, I updated an app, and when I opened it, I got a shock with how far the permissions are going. The updated app said note: we're going to collect this data about your device. The three pieces that pi**ed me off today are:
1. Phone number
2. Android device ID
3. Info. about all apps on phone
If you're famialiar with why Facebook is one of the greatest marketing successes of our time, then you probably, like me, like to protect your privacy on your phone. I don't think Google is all bad, and there are so many apps which help you in this regard.
Without voiding the warranty of my new phone, I cannot yet get root. I need root to install all sorts of apps which help protect me and my life. Would you tell a stranger on the street your name, age, what's on your phone, phone number, the sites you visit etc? I wouldn't do that. I'm frustrated right now, caught between saving my new warranty and not selling my life for a few stupid 'free' games. I think there is a misstep here. OK the manufacturers let us modify software at our own risk, but they sell the stories of our phones living in an app heaven/bountyland/happy place, but don't do anything to help us protect our privacy.
I agree with you completely. But there are methods to root your phone without unlocking the bootloader (if you still think they will discover, you just have to flash a stock firmware before taking to the store and done)
Sent from my LT26i with Tapatalk 2
Thanks buddy. I've tried all locked-bootloader roots available in this section, flashtool and others.
p.s. for anyone interested in one in this stuff, probably my favourite app (requires root) is LBE Privacy Guard. I used it on other Xperias and there's nothing it can't do!
Wow tinfoil hat alert...
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
CrazyPeter said:
Wow tinfoil hat alert...
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow, you can't post anything on this site without an irrelevant sarcastic answer.
Why can't you just root using this? http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1886460
Straight forward and quick. Then if you need to send your phone in just flash back to your standard stock firmware??
Thanks very much! I have tried that one though, and posted a report - it fails on my phone. It works for some phones (especially the S and P) but not on all the 2012 Sony phones. I've rooted a few phones before, so I check all the things you have to do and can't find the problem. No one with my phone has posted success with that tool so I doubt it's just me.
I seen in the data usage, some of the free apps have been upload a LOT of data, when they have no reason to e.g. a free live wallpaper. It makes me so angry I just want to nuke the software and not install anything new until root is sorted.
On wed. work gave us all note 2 for our new hand held devices. The thing is the software we use for work is in the makings. like a scanner app. They took out the play store so we can not download anything. Now I have been an android guy since day 1, I cant write code on anything like that but i root and rom with the best of them. i can root this pig and get the things back on here what i need. I have a few guys counting on me to get it done. I just want some feed back as what I should do. Mind you they did send out a disclaimer saying dont do this or download that. can they really catch me?
Probably not, but if they did how bad are the repercussions?
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
Some companies have root checkers for their secure network. So can they tell of you're rooted, probably not. However your phone may not connect to your needed services, but you could try a root hider and may get around it
Sent from my SGH-T889 using xda app-developers app
Also what ya gonna do if they are standing there and demand your phone to check it. Just think through the risks first.
Also yeah it may block you with a root checker and overcoming that is a PITA but doable.
Also be prepared to loose everything if you somehow leak private company information.
This sounds a littler different than companies who just check for root. Your company has gone a step further than that. They are obviously pretty serious.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda app-developers app
nosympathy said:
Also what ya gonna do if they are standing there and demand your phone to check it. Just think through the risks first.
Also yeah it may block you with a root checker and overcoming that is a PITA but doable.
Also be prepared to loose everything if you somehow leak private company information.
This sounds a littler different than companies who just check for root. Your company has gone a step further than that. They are obviously pretty serious.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 to all of this. Do you like your job? They may consider your intent to unlock THEIR device as theft. Sounds like they are going through a lot of trouble to keep them secure.
Please read forum rules before posting
Questions and help issues go in Q&A
Thread moved
Thank you for your cooperation
Friendly Neighborhood Moderator
1) Yes they can tell, quite easily.
2) Its not worth the loss of your job.
3) If your the guy in charge of the rooting, you get fired the rest of the sheep get warnings.
4) The reason to lock up a device is for security reasons while your device has work realted information on it. Even a contact list /addressbook is valuable information if it has CEO/CFO/CTO direct phone numbers/emails/IM etc... Let alone emails containing intellectual property or trade secrets.
I have run systems & network security for several companies and while I make exceptions depending on the request and/or person. If you do it and they ever want to terminate you....... they just found a way to fire you *with cause* aka no unemployment any time.
Also: I didn't even mention customized mobiletracker/CarrierIQ and similar background services that announce to me everything your running/useage/software versions etc... the moment your device authenticates with any cellular/wireless network and has connectivity.
http://www.verizonwireless.com/dam/support/pdf/system_update/galaxys4.pdf
I woke up this morning and on my phone was a request to update from Verizon, it was an official update.
I haven't seen anything anywhere and I can't believe that I am one of the first on XDA to get this;
I go first!
Lol :laugh:
Lol, spam is spam!
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
No offense, but you are a little late to the party. The update has been out for a week now.
See these threads:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2731099 - Thread created on first rollouts
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2658480 - Discussion thread
The only nice thing is that VZW finally released info on the update.
Omega360 said:
No offense, but you are a little late to the party. The update has been out for a week now.
See these threads:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2731099 - Thread created on first rollouts
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2658480 - Discussion thread
The only nice thing is that VZW finally released info on the update.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't think I was the first but I haven't been following lately so I didn't see anything. How do you get rid of that constant nag?
What is so exciting about an update that essentially kills write permissions to the SD card and adds more bloat? Not being sarcastic. Just do not see the benefit. S4 seems fine, pre update.
JMO
rushless said:
What is so exciting about an update that essentially kills write permissions to the SD card and adds more bloat? Not being sarcastic. Just do not see the benefit. S4 seems fine, pre update.
JMO
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Didn't add more bloat. Please explain in detail what bloat you are talking about. Most bloat can be turned off. As a matter of fact, one of the best parts of the update is the ability to disable bloat from the app drawer. Also, 4.4 added the framework for Tap to Pay. There are plenty of reasons to update. Kit Kat runs better for me and has features I find very useful.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
MedleHed said:
Didn't add more bloat. Please explain in detail what bloat you are talking about. Most bloat can be turned off. As a matter of fact, one of the best parts of the update is the ability to disable bloat from the app drawer. Also, 4.4 added the framework for Tap to Pay. There are plenty of reasons to update. Kit Kat runs better for me and has features I find very useful.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't believe you can disable KNOX(crap) without root. There are probably a few other verizon apps that cannot be disabled without root.
Knox? I haven't had a problem with it... It does nothing on my phone. Can you please explain what your problem is with Knox?
Sent from my SCH-I545 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
You CAN disable knox....The only thing I wish I could disable that u can't is the stupid security update notifications
Sent from my SCH-I545 using xda app-developers app
It's not that it's a bad update by any means, 4.4 code has a lot of efficiencies over 4.3, but with as long as the wait was i guess people over hyped it and expected more new end-user features.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
My phone didn't show the update till a few hours ago. At first I was semi excited, then I remembered I still plan on rooting the crap out of the thing..... Verizon and their slow nonsense don't sit well with me sometimes.
D3Seeker said:
My phone didn't show the update till a few hours ago. At first I was semi excited, then I remembered I still plan on rooting the crap out of the thing..... Verizon and their slow nonsense don't sit well with me sometimes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you want the update and be rooted, go here --> http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2726868
rushless said:
What is so exciting about an update that essentially kills write permissions to the SD card and adds more bloat? Not being sarcastic. Just do not see the benefit. S4 seems fine, pre update.
JMO
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Honestly, the SD card "issue" is so overblown its not funny. It doesn't kill write permissions... what it does do, is make it so that apps don't have the right to go willy nilly across you card, to folders it shouldn't have permission to (unless you agree that a random app you download should have the ability to muck with other programs folders).
I made the jump on my phone more than a month ago, and my day to day impacts are NILL. Poweramp still plays all my music just fine, and not one program has had a FC or any other issue. In fact, had i not read articles from other people about the sky falling, i would have never known anyway....
Divine_Madcat said:
Honestly, the SD card "issue" is so overblown its not funny.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's an unexpected, undocumented change. That you don't run applications which get broken doesn't mean that others aren't hurt by it.
Google is the new Microsoft - they think because they're successful they can do no wrong, but in reality they're clueless about a lot of things. Big enough to not care, and it's the users who get hurt.
Adding *nix permissions to a vfat volume is the right thing to do (short of requiring a modern file system on an SD card), but they're doing it wrong by not phasing it in so apps can accommodate the change.
Well, fill me in. What broke? What app needs to write willy nilly to folders it shouldn't be in that is now no longer working?
For all the moaning people give, i seem to have trouble finding REAL problems...
Divine_Madcat said:
Well, fill me in. What broke? What app needs to write willy nilly to folders it shouldn't be in that is now no longer working?
For all the moaning people give, i seem to have trouble finding REAL problems...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Subsonic is one example. Here's a detailed explanation with another example.
Your Google-fu is weak.
mike.s said:
Subsonic is one example. Here's a detailed explanation with another example.
Your Google-fu is weak.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At the end of the thread, its reported fixed, and your other article is from 2012 and has nothing to do with any of this.
Keep trying....
As it is.. apps may write to any folder they own, and may read from every folder. Unless the app is badly written, this change should honestly be a non issue.
Divine_Madcat said:
Honestly, the SD card "issue" is so overblown its not funny.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree 100%
Divine_Madcat said:
At the end of the thread, its reported fixed, and your other article is from 2012 and has nothing to do with any of this.
Keep trying....
As it is.. apps may write to any folder they own, and may read from every folder. Unless the app is badly written, this change should honestly be a non issue.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL. It was "fixed" by manually changing things in the application, fortunately the app had a setting where the storage path can be configured by the user, many don't. KitKat broke something which worked before because it introduced new restrictions with no prior warning to developers.
The linked article is about this issue, exactly. You didn't read the comments, did you? Or try searching ? The change has been around for a while (back to Honeycomb), but manufacturers worked around it for most devices. Now Google seems to be enforcing it as a requirement with KitKat (or Samsung decided to not do the work-around anymore, we'll see). Maybe it's not causing you problems, but it is causing problems for people.