Related
anyone know that what is difference between Unofficial CM9 Nightly and alpha 0.6 ?
hki_peter said:
anyone know that what is difference between Unofficial CM9 Nightly and alpha 0.6 ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nightlies are probably going to be less stable.
Basically, when you get a nightly, it's not yet been released. It's what somebody was working on last night...when they quit working on it, whether successful in what they had been working on or not, it was uploaded - hence the name, nightly.
And now you know.
And knowing's half the battle.
sean is here. said:
Nightlies are probably going to be less stable.
Basically, when you get a nightly, it's not yet been released. It's what somebody was working on last night...when they quit working on it, whether successful in what they had been working on or not, it was uploaded - hence the name, nightly.
And now you know.
And knowing's half the battle.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well its slightly more than just something someone happened to be working on and left it!
I'm using the KANG of 20120216 and finding it is far better than my experience with .06!
And I'm about to flash 20120217.
pa49 said:
Well its slightly more than just something someone happened to be working on and left it!
I'm using the KANG of 20120216 and finding it is far better than my experience with .06!
And I'm about to flash 20120217.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
EDIT: I re-read this reply after posting my response, and the first sentence is just incorrect. A 'nightly' is nothing "more than just something someone happened to be working on and left it".
The rest is subjective opinion, but the definition of what a nightly is can be found clearly explained below.
I think you've misunderstood me, or something else somewhere along the line.
I'm not saying that they're better or worse than official releases.
I was merely pointing out that the way they come about, is that they aren't fully evaluated and tested for stability in order to be released publicly as a finished product.
Before a major release, devs will typically spent time testing their software themselves, in addition to sending it out to 'focus groups' (they aren't REALLY focus groups but serve the same function) where they are further tested...then upon completion of testing, or when a threshold of minimum functionality has been reached (often with a pre-specified maximum number of bugs or critical failures) they can be released publicly.
Nightlies don't go through that extensive testing. That's where the name comes from. The devs 'clock out' and the ROM is built, and posted as a 'nightly'.
From the CM Team:
... Lastly we have the Nightlies, which are as volatile as a firmware can get. These releases keep coming at an interval of a day or two and if you do end up trying one of these, do not be alarmed if the your device goes cuckoo on you. These ROMs are largely untested, and as advised by CyanogenMod, not meant for use for an average user. These releases, are meant to test untested waters with tweaked codes that may or may not break your phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My understanding was that the nightlies were being built automatically by a script that pulls the most recent source from the cm server. As new code is added daily by devs it is automatically put into nightly builds for testing.
joggerman said:
My understanding was that the nightlies were being built automatically by a script that pulls the most recent source from the cm server. As new code is added daily by devs it is automatically put into nightly builds for testing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As far as I'm aware, you are correct.
Hey guys,
I just want to add, the one of the developers of the official CM9 alpha release is recommending users install the nightly as there may not be an official update pushed put anytime soon.
http://liliputing.com/2012/02/nightly-builds-of-cyanogenmod-9-for-the-hp-touchpad-now-available.html
Anyone know which nightly is pretty stable?
wonshikee said:
Anyone know which nightly is pretty stable?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
go for alpha 1 as dalingrin said the nightlies won't be based on alpha 1 until a few days later.
I'm confused - what are the differences/advantages/disadvantages/progress/status of the two options of CM9 ROMs?
MunJeni
WinSuk
"official" CM9 (which I haven't really seen yet)
Maybe I'm the only one confused, but these two ROM developers seem to be working both together and separately.
Don't get me wrong - I'm thrilled that multiple people are working on an ICS ROM for the Aria. I just want to know what the differences are.
Thanks,
Dan
They use different kernels. as far as I know thats pretty much it. I'm running munjini's currently and it works great for the most part
80+% of munjeni's ROM came from mine, if that helps. Yet everyone is exploding over it
I think that the projects should be merged with the best parts in each one. You both do great work and it should be best for the community to combine efforts and avoid confusion and supporting two projects.
CaptainMaki said:
I think that the projects should be merged with the best parts in each one. You both do great work and it should be best for the community to combine efforts and avoid confusion and supporting two projects.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Already tried that.
CaptainMaki said:
I think that the projects should be merged with the best parts in each one. You both do great work and it should be best for the community to combine efforts and avoid confusion and supporting two projects.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried but all my commit pushed to WinSuk github was reverted so I opened separated git using initial repo from WinSuk and started working separated... but builds between WinSuk and me is not drastically diferent, thing about 2 roms is good thing becouse we have 2 diferent tests and we are at finish abble to merge good things between 2 roms!
if you both be able to work together in the end that would be awesome and the best for the community.
Again, thanks for both of you on all the hard work you put into this.
Big thanks to you both. I have been running the Munjeni May 10 build for just a few days now but it is working great. I love how fast the GPS gets a lock (easily 20x faster than CM7.2).
what navigation software are you using. cause I'm still have trouble with getting a fast lock on some of them.
CaptainMaki said:
what navigation software are you using. cause I'm still have trouble with getting a fast lock on some of them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock Android Maps and Navigation. However, the first time it did say I was a full 2 states away. Letting it settle for a day seemed to do the trick.
Hi Kazuni et al, are you developing a non-Samsung themed JB ROM for the I9305? Something like the many CM10/ParanoidAndroid ROMs that are available for the I9300? Would be great to have a "purer" ROM for this new flagship....less of the Samsung customization
This has been discussed several times before but the I9305/I9300 share most of the same components, less the radio correct? If so, would the I9300 ROMs work if they're used w/ a 9305 radio instead? So it would be an easier way to port 9300-developed ROMs over?
Would love to see this, esp if it's built on the new 4.1.2!
There are other differences as well like a different partition layout, but I guess that they might partially work if configured with a compatible layout, would likely have no sound or modem functionality without proper work, a Rom compiled for this model would be better.
Sent from my GT-I9305 using xda app-developers app
I have asked xplodwild in the cm10 thread uf any if team hacksung are able time work on a port. We can but hope!!!
mys3 said:
I have asked xplodwild in the cm10 thread uf any if team hacksung are able time work on a port. We can but hope!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have my fingers crossed. After putting CM10 on a relatives SG3 I want in on the action bad.
I intend to jump in and have a go at CM10 for the i9305 when I receive mine this week. It will be my first attempt at a complete ROM so don't hold your breath or anything.
farnsbarns said:
I intend to jump in and have a go at CM10 for the i9305 when I receive mine this week. It will be my first attempt at a complete ROM so don't hold your breath or anything.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:good: You go champ! Let us know how you progress!
Man I hope there is a CM10 rom soon. I want to get started on rooting, I am an iOS refugeee!!! All im doing is watching people on youtube with CM10/Paranoid Android and being jealous. =(
farnsbarns said:
I intend to jump in and have a go at CM10 for the i9305 when I receive mine this week. It will be my first attempt at a complete ROM so don't hold your breath or anything.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh I will be holding my breath!
bleepsake said:
Man I hope there is a CM10 rom soon. I want to get started on rooting, I am an iOS refugeee!!! All im doing is watching people on youtube with CM10/Paranoid Android and being jealous. =(
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't get me wrong, but didn't you notice the big ****storm about samsung being developer unfriendly and the exynos platform being the hell on earth?
Some of our guys are very sick of samsung and are not going to touch any of the new samsung devices.
Not saying that nobody will port it, but i recommend you to sell this device as fast as possible and get a new upcoming nexus device if you really wanna run AOSP based roms.
If you like laggy and buggy AOSP roms and especially waiting for round about 6 months to get a new android version, stay on what you're currently owning.
codeworkx said:
Don't get me wrong, but didn't you notice the big ****storm about samsung being developer unfriendly and the exynos platform being the hell on earth?
Some of our guys are very sick of samsung and are not going to touch any of the new samsung devices.
Not saying that nobody will port it, but i recommend you to sell this device as fast as possible and get a new upcoming nexus device if you really wanna run AOSP based roms.
If you like laggy and buggy AOSP roms and especially waiting for round about 6 months to get a new android version, stay on what you're currently owning.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't really expect you to add something positive to this topic.!. I really hope that all of us that just got the I9503 didn't buy it for only running AOSP based roms. If that was the case I would buy the upcoming LG nexus that's NOT the case for me. And SamsungExynos posted a tweet today "full availability of integrated source code for #Exynos 4 family of processors on OrigenBoard by the end of 2012"
I wonder what will happen to all these devs that left the GS3 because of samsung not releasing the Source. And then now it looks like they will b releasing something soon, Are you all going to come back? Or just let new and upcoming devs take over. I Feel that with all sources released on this device with the Quad Core and 2gb Ram DAMMMM how smoooth will a proper built CM10 run. And to be honest My device is very smooth as it is. I am not dying for CM10 i actually like the new touchwiz, I like features and animations. And with all of that , this is still hell smooth in my opinion. Either way To me its a win win, if they release the source GREAT if not oh well still very good!!... But i do believe they will release it.
btemtd said:
I wonder what will happen to all these devs that left the GS3 because of samsung not releasing the Source. And then now it looks like they will b releasing something soon, Are you all going to come back? Or just let new and upcoming devs take over. I Feel that with all sources released on this device with the Quad Core and 2gb Ram DAMMMM how smoooth will a proper built CM10 run. And to be honest My device is very smooth as it is. I am not dying for CM10 i actually like the new touchwiz, I like features and animations. And with all of that , this is still hell smooth in my opinion. Either way To me its a win win, if they release the source GREAT if not oh well still very good!!... But i do believe they will release it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
-----> "for OrigenBoard" <-----
It's a exynos development board and has not much to do with samsung smartphones.
The ICS code was broken, outdated and mostly unusable on phones.
The same code is now available again.
I really don't expect a wonder.
From what andreilux has seen and stated below it does not seem like the old stuff and samsung continue to update. Last update was done earlier today here is what andreilux said in the exynos petition page in the i9300:
(They released the 5250 development board and site together with a 800 page user's manual, something which we didn't have before for any SoC. I'll have to see what they uploaded on the Git as it's quite a lot.
Edit: from what I can see at first glance they have 4.1.1 Jellybean sources up there and apparently the newest stuff.
Sent from my GT-I9305 using xda app-developers app)
So it seems samsung is pulling up there sox and getting **** done. Maybe christmas came early i also have news from a great dev getting our devic. (I9305) but must not say who at this point
btemtd said:
From what andreilux has seen and stated below it does not seem like the old stuff and samsung continue to update. Last update was done earlier today here is what andreilux said in the exynos petition page in the i9300:
(They released the 5250 development board and site together with a 800 page user's manual, something which we didn't have before for any SoC. I'll have to see what they uploaded on the Git as it's quite a lot.
Edit: from what I can see at first glance they have 4.1.1 Jellybean sources up there and apparently the newest stuff.
Sent from my GT-I9305 using xda app-developers app)
So it seems samsung is pulling up there sox and getting **** done. Maybe christmas came early i also have news from a great dev getting our devic. (I9305) but must not say who at this point
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will this dev build ROMs or only Kernels?
All i want for my nice i9305 is a real good dev
Stony-D said:
Will this dev build ROMs or only Kernels?
All i want for my nice i9305 is a real good dev
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
kernel is the most important thing here atm...but a good cm or aosp were pretty hell for this phone !
i heard miui will release a jb version for i9300 soon so this porting would be easy
Yes he does. But not saying anything more for now
Sent from my GT-I9305 using xda app-developers app
Omfg sorry for spam but the dev will build really ROMs?
Sorry Spaming here but a CM10 Rom for my I9305 would be realy Great.
+1 to non-Samsung-based JB rom like CM10, PA or PACman's mix of all three I'm picking up my i9305 this weekend (South Africa) and really hope that some of the big dev's take to this handset.. number of roms at current is dis-heartening :crying: :crying:
---------- Post added at 04:15 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:32 PM ----------
codeworkx said:
-----> "for OrigenBoard" <-----
It's a exynos development board and has not much to do with samsung smartphones.
The ICS code was broken, outdated and mostly unusable on phones.
The same code is now available again.
I really don't expect a wonder.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi codeworkx.. this is a copy of a post I made on another i9305 thread, it seems more relevant here tho..
Samsung have released the source code for the i9305.. here and I noticed it's also on Github here does this mean there's a chance of more dev's buying into this device for custom rom and kernel devving
defibitely deserves a plus one on this. cm10 porterssss please i would love to experience a proper stock jb theme
Sent from my Beautiful GT-I9305 using Tapatalk
I realize this is the age-old question everytime a new milestone comes out, but I'm eating lunch and it's kind of quiet around here. :laugh:
Quiet indeed.
If Lollipop makes it to the i9100, then I will do my best to make sure that it makes it to the i777.
The i9100 has a MASSIVE following, but a lot of the devs have moved on to newer devices that are better supported by the manufacturers.
Either way, my fingers are crossed, and hopefully we'll have some code-savvy help if I get stuck. (I'm looking at you @rogersb11 and @TheGeekyNimrod )
desteele said:
I realize this is the age-old question everytime a new milestone comes out, but I'm eating lunch and it's kind of quiet around here. :laugh:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If it gets Lollipop I'll be shocked as it didn't get kitkat officially. In fact, it didn't even get a jelly bean 4.2.x update from at&t. Now if you mean custom lollipop roms, then I am sure the sgh-i777 will get at least a few.
cyril279 said:
Quiet indeed.
If Lollipop makes it to the i9100, then I will do my best to make sure that it makes it to the i777.
The i9100 has a MASSIVE following, but a lot of the devs have moved on to newer devices that are better supported by the manufacturers.
Either way, my fingers are crossed, and hopefully we'll have some code-savvy help if I get stuck. (I'm looking at you @rogersb11 and @TheGeekyNimrod )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm still hanging around lol. I know CyanideMod isn't updated super frequently but I wanted to try and bring this old dog something that had, well basically everything lol. So many additions that I've really even shocked myself. From shifted cm where I stated the changes I deleted my branches and started over for CyanideMod. I plan to as I mentioned bring at least one Lollipop build to the i777 and of course will give @cyril279 and @TheGeekyNimrod any useful advice that I can in aiding them bring it as well. I'm quite content with CyanideMod at this point so probably won't myself be focused on Lollipop for awhile as I just dumped at least 2 straight months into it LOL. BUT to answer the OP it will indeed see the i777
rogersb11 said:
I'm still hanging around lol. I know CyanideMod isn't updated super frequently but I wanted to try and bring this old dog something that had, well basically everything lol. So many additions that I've really even shocked myself. From shifted cm where I stated the changes I deleted my branches and started over for CyanideMod. I plan to as I mentioned bring at least one Lollipop build to the i777 and of course will give @cyril279 and @TheGeekyNimrod any useful advice that I can in aiding them bring it as well. I'm quite content with CyanideMod at this point so probably won't myself be focused on Lollipop for awhile as I just dumped at least 2 straight months into it LOL. BUT to answer the OP it will indeed see the i777
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The biggest thing I think we will face is updates needed for the device trees. I'm sure there will be a few other snags along the way, but the device tree is a must in order for anything to work. I know CM, Carbon, Slim, Omni, and all the rest will eventually update to Lollipop, and when they do, I plan on updating my builds as well. There's not a lot of us maintaining anything for this device, but I think the general consensus is that we will stick around and try to keep this never dying device on par with the rest of em.
i just want to put out a thanks to you guys for keeping it alive. it was a pleasant surprise to end up back on my gs2 and see that there are still great roms to run my 360 on. it was also a great reminder as to why i don't really need the latest and greatest phone to enjoy owning one.
-patrick
Hopefully you have all seen it by now, but through alpha builds and the genius work of @rogersb11 there are Lollipop builds in the development section now.
phermey said:
i just want to put out a thanks to you guys for keeping it alive. it was a pleasant surprise to end up back on my gs2 and see that there are still great roms to run my 360 on. it was also a great reminder as to why i don't really need the latest and greatest phone to enjoy owning one.
-patrick
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree 100% with you
I know this is yesterday's news but I felt compelled to post this and get other users input on this topic.
http://www.cyanogenmod.org/blog/releases-11-12-final
What I don't understand is Cyanogen's priorities when it comes to which devices get 11, 12 or 12.1. I completely understand about phasing out CM11/KitKat as that is now a rather "old" version of android. However what I don't understand is why a device as new/old as ours (Aug 2013 is not THAT old) is stuck on CM12 (and now a final Snapshot build as of 6/25)? I mean, the Galaxy S3 is even getting 12.1 builds. I'm wondering if its because that was a far more popular device than the G2 was?
Just wanted to put this out there and see what other people think and find out what they're running currently on their G2 variant. I own the US T-Mobile D801 variant and do NOT want to run stock (LG) Lollipop since my device tends to run extremely HOT on it. I know not everyone was complaining about their G2 overheating on stock LP but I notice a considerable difference running CM12.
So, how do you guys feel about this? Do you even care or what?
t3chn0s1s said:
I know this is yesterday's news but I felt compelled to post this and get other users input on this topic.
http://www.cyanogenmod.org/blog/releases-11-12-final
What I don't understand is Cyanogen's priorities when it comes to which devices get 11, 12 or 12.1. I completely understand about phasing out CM11/KitKat as that is now a rather "old" version of android. However what I don't understand is why a device as new/old as ours (Aug 2013 is not THAT old) is stuck on CM12 (and now a final Snapshot build as of 6/25)? I mean, the Galaxy S3 is even getting 12.1 builds. I'm wondering if its because that was a far more popular device than the G2 was?
Just wanted to put this out there and see what other people think and find out what they're running currently on their G2 variant. I own the US T-Mobile D801 variant and do NOT want to run stock (LG) Lollipop since my device tends to run extremely HOT on it. I know not everyone was complaining about their G2 overheating on stock LP but I notice a considerable difference running CM12.
So, how do you guys feel about this? Do you even care or what?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We haven't had nightlies for a while now. What you see as nightlies aren't really worthwhile builds, they didn't have any device or kernel fixes for the g2.
A new 11 build is coming probably because half the android userbase relies on kitkat at the moment.
As for the s3, it's not getting CM12 nor 12.1, not the international version at the least. Archi is maintaining an unofficial version, but it still carries the bugs from 10.0/10.1.
Lastly, this is the commit that requires to be merged in order for the builds to even be considered started:
http://review.cyanogenmod.org/#/c/93181/
Without it, nothing CAF related can be merged, and as such, no CM12.1 builds can be had for our device. I believe the reason it's not merged because not all of the variants have a lollipop release, if they ever will get one. Also the whole bootstack/amount of users who don't reed is astonishingly dangerous to handle, so rashed simply preferred to skip building for now.
Finally, it's not that popular of a device. It's a nexus without being a nexus with a locked bootloader, which is a pain in the ass and not too many maintainers have it left (they either went with G3 or skipped LG entirely, as did a whole bunch from the exynos team back in the day).
t3chn0s1s said:
I saw you responded to my post about CM12 nightlies not continuing for the G2. Wanted to ask you (since you didn't mention) what 5.1 (CAF source) ROM you're running? What would you suggest for a stable AOSP ROM that has device/kernel specific updates for our G2s?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why not reply to me in this thread then?
I'm running official euphoria builds. Any caf roms run fine. They are all based on the same LG-devs CAF device source + kernel source. Some roms have specific tweaks, but as far as functionality, they all work the same way (ie: if bluetooth deep sleep is broken, it's most likely broken in every rom).
Choristav said:
Why not reply to me in this thread then?
I'm running official euphoria builds. Any caf roms run fine. They are all based on the same LG-devs CAF device source + kernel source. Some roms have specific tweaks, but as far as functionality, they all work the same way (ie: if bluetooth deep sleep is broken, it's most likely broken in every rom).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry - was on my phone when I saw your replies and it was just easier for me to respond in the other thread.
Anyways.. thanks for the info. I've done some research and I'm a bit more informed about CAF and what it means to device specific sources, ROMs, etc. Are you just using the stock Euphoria kernel or something else?
On this forum @varund7726 builds his rather excellent ResurrectionRom from the latest CM code release. I suggest you use that. For the D803, @zr239 has beaten all odds including LG not releasing CAF code, to build a fully functional pure CM 12.1 ROM that closely tracks official CM repos.
Lg G2 has it pretty good !
@Choristav
I wanted to clarify something you said in your initial response to my OP. You said the S3 wasn't going to get CM12 or 12.1 but when I navigate to the CM downloads page for ANY S3 variant - they ALL have CM12.1 nightlies still being generated. What exactly did you mean?
t3chn0s1s said:
@Choristav
I wanted to clarify something you said in your initial response to my OP. You said the S3 wasn't going to get CM12 or 12.1 but when I navigate to the CM downloads page for ANY S3 variant - they ALL have CM12.1 nightlies still being generated. What exactly did you mean?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I checked, you are right, several of the qualcomm variants have cyanogenmod support. This means that they have active maintainers, but they also don't have to deal with locked bootloader crap, which is why the bump commit is so important for our device.
I only mentioned the international version, which support was dropped because it had a lot of issues thanks to its closed source exynos processor (it requires extra work, and some stuff doesn't end up working anyway).
Not really much to say, the commit is already in CM's gerrit, it's just waiting for review. Maybe it's a CTS-side issue?
Aside from that, being a maintainer doesn't really require much, just effort and presence. It's not an easy task, I'm just saying anyone can apply to be a maintainer and get nighties rolling for a device you might not even have heard of.
@Rashed97 is the man for our G2 when it comes to CM. Dont mind nightlies as long as Rashed is around
Note: he is currently busy with the One M9 but we will hopefully see some cool stuff from him in the future.
Not really a big deal, last I remember those nightlies were still using outdated jellybean components. I wouldn't use them, I would use something on the G2 forums like Rashed97 builds like someone else said.
I don't think that the availability of nightlies has to do with the device itself so much as it has to do with someone maintaining the g2 and building roms, so nightlies could come back at any time if someone steps up and does it.
Ploxorz said:
Not really a big deal, last I remember those nightlies were still using outdated jellybean components. I wouldn't use them, I would use something on the G2 forums like Rashed97 builds like someone else said.
I don't think that the availability of nightlies has to do with the device itself so much as it has to do with someone maintaining the g2 and building roms, so nightlies could come back at any time if someone steps up and does it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And it appears you're correct as there is another nightly build up with today's date. I apparently posted this thread prematurely.
Guys I wouldnt worry to much about CM, its not like they are the only (or even best) option in the forums. If you guys want development then dig in and make some for it.
zelendel said:
Guys I wouldnt worry to much about CM, its not like they are the only (or even best) option in the forums. If you guys want development then dig in and make some for it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are absolutely right. I had no idea until I posted this thread that CM nightlies did not contain any device specific updates. I honestly NEVER used to like CM at all. I honestly hated it... until owning a OnePlus One. I originally had the G2 right when it came out in 2013 and sold it off long ago & moved on to better devices - but when my OPO got stolen about 2 months back or so - I had to find a relatively cheap, but decent device and the G2 was the best bang for the buck (5.2" display, quick charge 2.0, 3000 mAh battery) and no other phones in 2013 came close to the specs the G2 had at the time.
So, now that I know CM is basically a sh*t ROM for this device I'll be moving on to a ROM that is compiled using CAF sources. Thanks everyone for your input!
Somehow doesn't look too good so far:
https://jira.cyanogenmod.org/browse/CYAN-6556
But why oh why?
The LG G2 still is such a modern and powerful device. It might be almost two years "old", but it's way better than a lot of other current devices.
I am using AICP on my g2. It is based on CM(5.1.1).
What's the best place to follow updates / changes to the CAF stuff?
I know there's a handful of ROMs based on CAF sources, I'm not too interested in the changelogs of those ROMs, more following the progress of CAF before it eventually all gets merged into CM12.1.
Is this it? https://github.com/lg-devs/android_device_lge_g2-common/commits/cm-12.1-caf
seanp25 said:
What's the best place to follow updates / changes to the CAF stuff?
I know there's a handful of ROMs based on CAF sources, I'm not too interested in the changelogs of those ROMs, more following the progress of CAF before it eventually all gets merged into CM12.1.
Is this it? https://github.com/lg-devs/android_device_lge_g2-common/commits/cm-12.1-caf
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would watch the Code Aurora forums where CAF comes from.
zelendel said:
I would watch the Code Aurora forums where CAF comes from.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's better to watch public activity on Rashed97's github. He is CM maintainer for LG G2 and he brought up CAF sources for our devices.
adamz667 said:
It's better to watch public activity on Rashed97's github. He is CM maintainer for LG G2 and he brought up CAF sources for our devices.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. It's far better to watch the main code base. Cm messes too much up by not testing code before merging.
zelendel said:
No. It's far better to watch the main code base. Cm messes too much up by not testing code before merging.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay, but @seanp25 probably want to follow source changes for our device, not common CAF source.
Just saw this:
Çetin ÇÖNE wrote on Jul 26 11:18 AM:
Why there is no nighlies it's really stable. Merge it please
Seth Shelnutt wrote on Jul 26 1:26 PM:
There are no nightlies because SELinux is not enabled. Sensors break with it enabled and I don't have time to address it yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Source:
http://review.cyanogenmod.org/#/c/103673/
Some days after that there came this:
http://review.cyanogenmod.org/#/c/103674/
So maybe there soon will be 12.1 nightlies?