Related
Can we expect Dell to release the kernel source? Are they required to release it?
Yes.......
they are supposed to release it ...
weather they do is another thing...
and if they don't who's gona fight em ... no one can afford it
http://gpl-violations.org/
how do we tell them that we want the source of dell and get them to get it??
@MattAtDell tweeted the other day in reply to some other random user that he would look into it, so its a good outlook that the kernel source will be made available... This will probably be the first phone I'd be willing to try and build a kernel for, lol. I'm sure we'd have a vanilla build of Android 2.1 (probably a bit broken) already IF we had the kernel source, 1.6 and 2.1 run the same kernel version 2.6.29 (froyo is 2.6.32 so it might actually take a bit more effort). This also explains why they show a 2.1 build even though they've committed to go straight to 2.2.
Random user my arse..
He was the first one from Dell that bothered to respond to *MY*query.
You can already build a vanilla froyo including kernel, but its taking a lot of experimenting to get a working combination of settings (I'm using the codearoura (qualcomm) surf ) git..
I may try a generic android git to see if it works..
jmhalder said:
@MattAtDell tweeted the other day in reply to some other random user that he would look into it, so its a good outlook that the kernel source will be made available... This will probably be the first phone I'd be willing to try and build a kernel for, lol. I'm sure we'd have a vanilla build of Android 2.1 (probably a bit broken) already IF we had the kernel source, 1.6 and 2.1 run the same kernel version 2.6.29 (froyo is 2.6.32 so it might actually take a bit more effort). This also explains why they show a 2.1 build even though they've committed to go straight to 2.2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any success compiling a kernel 2.6.33+ for Streak?
Any success compiling a kernel for Dell Streak? Where to start for it? I've been trying cyanogen kernels, but they don't seem to work or maybe I am doing something wrong creating the boot.img file. Any doc for it?
Thanks in advance!
Kernel source for Dell Streak?
Hi,
I was wondering whether the android kernel uses some kind of standardized kernel versions and configurations that allow people to add a module to an existing kernel in, let's say a dell streak tablet/smartphone.
Is it easy to get the kernel configuration and patches to compile modules for the streak?
Do they put some kind of locking so that nobody having a jtag tool can make the configuration changes to make the kernel read a new module?
jsmanrique said:
Any success compiling a kernel for Dell Streak? Where to start for it? I've been trying cyanogen kernels, but they don't seem to work or maybe I am doing something wrong creating the boot.img file. Any doc for it?
Thanks in advance!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ive had lots of success in building kernels, its just that none of them boot!
(technically I think this is known as not succeeding )
Building != Booting
So we have same situation... It's not a matter of building a kernel but booting it right on the device.
But what would be failing? Has anybody seen any log about what is happenning during boot to know what is failing? Because I would understand that a valid kernel would boot the device but some parts that would need propietary code wouldn't work (for example wifi, or whatever)... but no boot at all is quite strange.
Can anyone confirm at least a successful module compiling/running?
Not me
maxrfon said:
Can anyone confirm at least a successful module compiling/running?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not me! Is it really impossible the get it running?
If you ask dell for the linux source code, they must provide it. They have to make the exact source code available that can be used to compile the shipped binaries.
If they won't make it available upon request go inquire with http://gpl-violations.org as recommended earlier.
hey dcordes glad to see you here, I have asked via a few avenues, but was waiting till its available in the USA before pressing them further
theres a Guy popped up on modaco yesterday that thinks the boot.img needs 2k page file but 4k padding and suggested some changes to makeimg to get it to boot properly.
I'll play again later on
quiet bump, tweet by me:
http://www.twitlonger.com/show/3g0ebt
I also put something on twitter.
If you are as pissed as everybody about the lack of the sources, go write a mail to https://lists.gpl-violations.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
They are the attorney to each user of GPL licensed software ! They will tell you what to do. If you browse the archives they will advise to keep asking for sources. We did that. No it's time to collect evidence of the ignored requests and take further steps.
But first we should let that mailing list know ! If nobody will mail it in the next few days I will. I don't have the device but I hate industry going ignorant on customers. It is also an insult to everybody working on the Linux kernel source code. And that's many and includes myself.
cheers
dcordes said:
But first we should let that mailing list know ! If nobody will mail it in the next few days I will. I don't have the device but I hate industry going ignorant on customers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do have the device.
http://lists.gpl-violations.org/pipermail/legal/2010-September/002235.html
Hi all,
i want to start with AOSP 4.2 for our SGS3 i9300 - is anybody interested to develop and publish a AOSP based rom with me?
I'm a real application developer (C,C++,JAVA,PHP,MySQL,some Oracle PLSQL) and now its some cold out - i have time to do
some nice things
I think a team of 2 or 3 developers should be enough to develop on this rom, as we can use a lot from AOSP 4.1.2
### EDIT
As long as no one has found to help, here a short description of current progress:
- Code is pure based on AOSP 4.2 but some snippets of CyanogenMod to bring up hardware (camera,graphics,audio)
- Device is bootable (no other boot.img required anymore)
- Bootanimation is working
- Mount of partitions is working
- Deodexing is working
- adb, debuggerd and root access is working
Not working: a lot
- Graphic not working perfect, needs a kernel patch or a working gralloc/hwcomposer/hwconverter to work without laggy PMEM)
- Camera can not be activated due to a missing function call (undefined reference, maybe it can be solved with a newer driver)
- Audio: missing speaker device (Code have to reworked to work with stagefright and tinyalsa libs)
- USB/internal SDCard: cant be mounted (error message sounds like the device is mounted twice, have to find the error in init process)
- RIL not working (Java file from CM10 have to be integrated in frameworks/opt/telephony)
Currently, i'm working on the Graphic problem and USB part to bring up the device to a stable UI
Way to go man. Good luck to you!
Good luck ...!! Im waiting
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Good evening,
Well how have you imagined that? Do you have build something like that before or would this be your first attempts to build up a rom from scratch? Do you know what's all necessary to contribute for that?
I would try to help you, but I have clearly to say that I haven't done anything like this before. I'm in the last term of my study of technical computer sciences, working in a company as application programmer for C/C++ and Java(Android). Due to my studies I have also some knowledge about hardware programming, down to read/writing some code in assembler. I would be interested to this if I get introduced to the topic and some help with the necessary tool chain wouldn't hurt too ^^.
greetings
hop3l3ss1990 said:
Good evening,
Well how have you imagined that? Do you have build something like that before or would this be your first attempts to build up a rom from scratch? Do you know what's all necessary to contribute for that?
I would try to help you, but I have clearly to say that I haven't done anything like this before. I'm in the last term of my study of technical computer sciences, working in a company as application programmer for C/C++ and Java(Android). Due to my studies I have also some knowledge about hardware programming, down to read/writing some code in assembler. I would be interested to this if I get introduced to the topic and some help with the necessary tool chain wouldn't hurt too ^^.
greetings
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have successfully built a rom in year 2010 for the LG-P500 device, based on CM7 and modified it in a strange way, so i included a lot of nice things
written from scratch - this rom was a unicate ... later, i developed the "Phoenix Launcher" for Gingerbread enabled devices, but its development is currently
frozen because its strange to support every or almost every device with a bugless launcher. In the last months i learned a lot about android and have to re-think about
what i'm able to do, and what i want to do. In the summer of 2011 i bought my SGS3, the first thing i was doing was to remove that samsung crap from my device and
have installed AOKP. So now it's time to do my own thing again - i want to have AOSP as i think for me its the best Android solution for myself and want to publish it
to other users who think "thats ok for me" too
In short, it doesnt matter if its your first rom - its enough if you know about basic things like "how is android doing all that nice things", "how to debug code", "how to fix
some bugs (even strange bugs)" and some experience with git and github. All other you can learn in a very short time - i've learned the most of things with try & error
andy572 said:
I have successfully built a rom in year 2010 for the LG-P500 device, based on CM7 and modified it in a strange way, so i included a lot of nice things
written from scratch - this rom was a unicate ... later, i developed the "Phoenix Launcher" for Gingerbread enabled devices, but its development is currently
frozen because its strange to support every or almost every device with a bugless launcher. In the last months i learned a lot about android and have to re-think about
what i'm able to do, and what i want to do. In the summer of 2011 i bought my SGS3, the first thing i was doing was to remove that samsung crap from my device and
have installed AOKP. So now it's time to do my own thing again - i want to have AOSP as i think for me its the best Android solution for myself and want to publish it
to other users who think "thats ok for me" too
In short, it doesnt matter if its your first rom - its enough if you know about basic things like "how is android doing all that nice things", "how to debug code", "how to fix
some bugs (even strange bugs)" and some experience with git and github. All other you can learn in a very short time - i've learned the most of things with try & error
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This all sounds interesting for me and yes I like the idea of developing a own clean rom with some cool additional stuff, too. But what would be the first steps to a new rom? Have you begun with all the administration stuff like setting up a new gitrepo, make a to do list etc...?
I think Code debugging and writing some new stuff wouldn't be a problem for me but what are you meaning excactly with "how is android doing all that nice things"? How it build up, deep level architecture? Well, I know how the "normal" Linux system is working, how modules are getting loaded into the kernel... But how this is correctly working on android I have to learn at first and if there is a chance to do that I would do it
Currently on my S3 is SlimBean and till that there is still no update to 4.2 I'm happy with it, but exploring something new would be pretty cool
Do you have an IRC chat room or something like that? I've to go offline now, my girlfriend wants more attention.^^ But If you want, I' m willing to try to contribute to the rom
PS. I'm sorry for my bad English and hope its understandable, but outside from here you can talk to me in German ^^
If you want to help the AOSP experience on our phones the best place to do it is with the CyanogenMod guys. You'll find pretty much everything based on AOSP (including people that port Vanilla AOSP and AOKP) is using a CM kernel.
They're likely working on the merge now in terms of getting CM10.1 out (with Android 4.2) but most of our CM guys are pretty burned out on working with Samsung's subpar reference material to get basic stuff working (mostly HWC). If you think you could help with this, this would be provide a massive boost to the whole community that want to run these phones on an AOSP based ROM and they would be very grateful.
Gotta warn you though it sounds like it'll be an uphill struggle to get the rest of the stuff working right; unless Samsung release some decent sources for HWC.
Currently i have only downloaded the AOSP sources and started to integrate most of the configs. Currently it cant compile because AOSP is not AOKP/CM10
where i got the device and vendor directories, so i have to make some changes in the basic system. if it's compiling to the end, i open a fresh github account
and upload all my modifications. The compile process stops currently on audio,OMX plugins, graphics and camera - most of that are small pieces of changes
i have to make - i think, tomorrow (its monday in germany here) i can upload all and then we can start to develop on
andy572 said:
Currently i have only downloaded the AOSP sources and started to integrate most of the configs. Currently it cant compile because AOSP is not AOKP/CM10
where i got the device and vendor directories, so i have to make some changes in the basic system. if it's compiling to the end, i open a fresh github account
and upload all my modifications. The compile process stops currently on audio,OMX plugins, graphics and camera - most of that are small pieces of changes
i have to make - i think, tomorrow (its monday in germany here) i can upload all and then we can start to develop on
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wish i could help (just started learning JAVA ) ! gl with this awesome project
Nice to see you here, I remember you from the P500 forums.
Xda user krarvind should be able to give you some useful hints, you will have to contact him through the RD forum as his pm is locked down, or I could possibly put him in contact with you
slaphead20 said:
Xda user krarvind should be able to give you some useful hints, you will have to contact him through the RD forum as his pm is locked down, or I could possibly put him in contact with you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you, it would be nice if you can contact him
andy572 said:
Thank you, it would be nice if you can contact him
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, will mention it to him
andy572 said:
Currently i have only downloaded the AOSP sources and started to integrate most of the configs. Currently it cant compile because AOSP is not AOKP/CM10
where i got the device and vendor directories, so i have to make some changes in the basic system. if it's compiling to the end, i open a fresh github account
and upload all my modifications. The compile process stops currently on audio,OMX plugins, graphics and camera - most of that are small pieces of changes
i have to make - i think, tomorrow (its monday in germany here) i can upload all and then we can start to develop on
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How it's going forward?
Maybe it could be useful to publish the github link when it's ready and some more information like staus, on first post
In the next days I have some trouble with my exams ( in two weeks I'm completely finished with my studies ^^) but I think if there is something to do I'll find some time to work on.
Good Luck Dude~
I haven't tried AOSP yet.
Hope someday i can give it a go.:silly:
hop3l3ss1990 said:
How it's going forward?
Maybe it could be useful to publish the github link when it's ready and some more information like staus, on first post
In the next days I have some trouble with my exams ( in two weeks I'm completely finished with my studies ^^) but I think if there is something to do I'll find some time to work on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
current state:
- patched android/build so we can compile the kernel within the main compile process
- patched android/build main.mk file so we can use OpenJDK or Oracle JDK
- added android/vendor/aokp and android/vendor/samsung tree from AOKP (its the most useful directory structure)
- added android/hardware from AOKP so we have all that Exynos things that are needed, even by AOSP
- modified android/frameworks/native/include so a OMX Plugin header can be found
- modified android/libhardware and patched gralloc module
currently it compiles to the Webkit library, most of all apps, libs and binaries are building without errors - the next problem
to solve is the PRODUCT_COPY_FILES ****: nothing of proprietary files are copied to the android/out directory, seems like
a bug in android/build too.
For only 2 days trying to compile to the end without errors its a very good cut
here we go: it compiles to the end and a flashable "JOP40" zip could be created
tryed to flash, but it gives errors in CWM: have to remove the recovery folder and the recovery.sh file from etc folder in the ota zip file, but it doesnt boot up - got a black screen only.
do we need a new or patched kernel instead the CM10 smdk421x one?
Well does it have all the closed source libraries fron the phone? If not, it wont boot. Dont think i am calling you stupid, you obviously know what you are doing, but maybe you forgot. Idk. Check that. Try running a log cat and debug that.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
b-eock said:
Well does it have all the closed source libraries fron the phone? If not, it wont boot. Dont think i am calling you stupid, you obviously know what you are doing, but maybe you forgot. Idk. Check that. Try running a log cat and debug that.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the hint, yes i have all files included - i cant connect to adb, i see only small colored point on the top left side and a sensor
is red blinking (the one to the right of the speaker.
That would be the proximity sensor near the top front speaker. Cant connect, adb binary in /system/bin or xbin?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
NEED HELP
Hello guys, I'm working on a generic tree for our beloved device Honor 7, but not getting enough success, so each and every of you are invited to help me create a new device tree for AOSP 5.1 ROM or CM 12.1, so that we can taste the Stock Android too.
The benefits of these ROMs are that the device will get more fast and stable as there will be minimum apps and bloatwares installed.
So, it is a humble request, that whosoever have any knowledge about creating a tree from scratch please help me.
I have created a skeleton of the tree but it is not a success too as there are many things we still have to consider.
@sminki and @kenshiwara, we will setup an organization on GitHub so everyone can contribute there only.
Hi,
It will be wonderfull to have CM on our honor7.
Sorry mate. You haven't seen my troubles over the last few weeks then
After my H7 'died', I got a warranty replacement phone, and unlocking was proving impossible, each day was bringing more frustration and anger so i've sold it!
That's it, i'm out of the "honor" business for good (hence the "unsupported" bit on the recovery and kernel threads), but as a parting "gift", here's a few things that may help "the cause".
Sorry, the length of this post got out of control! :silly:
device tree starting point:
https://github.com/TeamWin/android_device_huawei_p8 - it's similar enough, that with a little editing and boom, we had our recovery*
https://github.com/debbiche/android_device_huawei_p8 - another fuller "tree" (wip), again the p8 is similar enough to use as a base
https://github.com/Gibbon99/android_device_huawei_hwgemini - mediapad x2 - another kirin
if you're insane, you could get the dtb files (iirc - i got these from compiling the source) and decompile, but this contains EVERYTHING, theses files are huge, many hundred kb and would take days to get the info out you need (if there is any!)
cm
have a look at codeworkx H6 git, it's the closest device you'll find that has CM actually running on it, albeit CM11 (and abandoned!)
https://github.com/codeworkx/proprietary_vendor_huawei
https://github.com/codeworkx/android_device_huawei_h60-common
other things:
osm0sis' kitchen out of the many boot image unpack/repack tools, this worked the best with huawei boot/recovery images
* with this in mind, anyone running Linux can pull apart my recovery, fix the issues in default.prop, add extra partitions to fstab and repack it. then post it for everyone else to use.
with the sh!tty way fastboot is on these phones, and the way modem binaries get patched, you're going to have to look for a way to write these in recovery (scripted with dd i imagine) so that everyone can use without having the ballache that is B100,B121,B140 etc etc to get to a version that will work with your ROM. this for me is where it's all going to hurt! (and end with bricks!)
final thing - the kernel source is terrible, it is so far removed from AOSP that simple things that you could normally just drop in, like cpu governors won't work. unless you really know C++ and how to debug it's gonna be near stock (like mine funnily enough!)
Good luck chaps :good: it's gonna be a hell of a ride!
sminki said:
Sorry mate. You haven't seen my troubles over the last few weeks then
After my H7 'died', I got a warranty replacement phone, and unlocking was proving impossible, each day was bringing more frustration and anger so i've sold it!
That's it, i'm out of the "honor" business for good (hence the "unsupported" bit on the recovery and kernel threads), but as a parting "gift", here's a few things that may help "the cause".
Sorry, the length of this post got out of control! :silly:
device tree starting point:
https://github.com/TeamWin/android_device_huawei_p8 - it's similar enough, that with a little editing and boom, we had our recovery*
https://github.com/debbiche/android_device_huawei_p8 - another fuller "tree" (wip), again the p8 is similar enough to use as a base
https://github.com/Gibbon99/android_device_huawei_hwgemini - mediapad x2 - another kirin
if you're insane, you could get the dtb files (iirc - i got these from compiling the source) and decompile, but this contains EVERYTHING, theses files are huge, many hundred kb and would take days to get the info out you need (if there is any!)
cm
have a look at codeworkx H6 git, it's the closest device you'll find that has CM actually running on it, albeit CM11 (and abandoned!)
https://github.com/codeworkx/proprietary_vendor_huawei
https://github.com/codeworkx/android_device_huawei_h60-common
other things:
osm0sis' kitchen out of the many boot image unpack/repack tools, this worked the best with huawei boot/recovery images
* with this in mind, anyone running Linux can pull apart my recovery, fix the issues in default.prop, add extra partitions to fstab and repack it. then post it for everyone else to use.
with the sh!tty way fastboot is on these phones, and the way modem binaries get patched, you're going to have to look for a way to write these in recovery (scripted with dd i imagine) so that everyone can use without having the ballache that is B100,B121,B140 etc etc to get to a version that will work with your ROM. this for me is where it's all going to hurt! (and end with bricks!)
final thing - the kernel source is terrible, it is so far removed from AOSP that simple things that you could normally just drop in, like cpu governors won't work. unless you really know C++ and how to debug it's gonna be near stock (like mine funnily enough!)
Good luck chaps :good: it's gonna be a hell of a ride!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, this will help enough and I was not aware of your troubles
I got a device tree working with CM12.1 and USB debugging, but Mali was a showstopper. Now I'm fighting with CM13 instead... Generally, the B313 ROM is far less hacky, but we lose the open source kernel for a while until they release one.
I will set up a GitHub tree with what I have when I get CM13 compiling again, however keep in mind that you need to patch the boot.img manually to use the closed-source B313 kernel until Huawei releases the source for that, which probably won't happen at the very least until it's fully in OTA. I'd love some help from someone who is more experienced, especially with the Mali drivers which are the worst of pains.
EDIT: I got CM13 compiling again. Let's hope for the best.
EDIT2: Mali works! Sadly, that currently depends on Huawei's libgui.so which brings in a huge chunk of Huawei's patched libraries - otherwise, it segfaults in strange places. Any ideas?
Is there any whatsapp group of honor 7.I want to join it.
udayraj99 said:
Is there any whatsapp group of honor 7.I want to join it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stop spamming
Omg I think I will never receive a Custom ROM for PLK-UL00 as they didn't release source code for that and device tree is way far
Mee too
omkarpranavxxx said:
Omg I think I will never receive a Custom ROM for PLK-UL00 as they didn't release source code for that and device tree is way far
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As an indian user evwn i feel i made wrong choice....should have gone for one plus x
asiekierka said:
I got a device tree working with CM12.1 and USB debugging, but Mali was a showstopper. Now I'm fighting with CM13 instead... Generally, the B313 ROM is far less hacky, but we lose the open source kernel for a while until they release one.
I will set up a GitHub tree with what I have when I get CM13 compiling again, however keep in mind that you need to patch the boot.img manually to use the closed-source B313 kernel until Huawei releases the source for that, which probably won't happen at the very least until it's fully in OTA. I'd love some help from someone who is more experienced, especially with the Mali drivers which are the worst of pains.
EDIT: I got CM13 compiling again. Let's hope for the best.
EDIT2: Mali works! Sadly, that currently depends on Huawei's libgui.so which brings in a huge chunk of Huawei's patched libraries - otherwise, it segfaults in strange places. Any ideas?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello, did any of the CM compiled fully to be a flashable zip? if yes, then have you flashed it and took logcat?
Nishadan said:
As an indian user evwn i feel i made wrong choice....should have gone for one plus x
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup lesson learnt snapdragon or nothing frm now on
maybe you know
I post link - http://download-c.huawei.com/downlo...oadId=62086&version=204465&siteCode=worldwide
Honor 7 Open Source（PLK-L01_Android5_0_2_EMUI3_1_kernel_EN)
Any progress?
I hope I can do something,it is nice to see cm for honor 7.
Since it has been a while that any Info came out of this thread I have to ask.. Is anyone still working the tree?
I normaly do not ask for etas but in this case it would be useful if the thread is abandoned that we could know the reasons and Problems so maybe someone else could join in with a different approach
cycovision said:
Since it has been a while that any Info came out of this thread I have to ask.. Is anyone still working the tree?
I normaly do not ask for etas but in this case it would be useful if the thread is abandoned that we could know the reasons and Problems so maybe someone else could join in with a different approach
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm a bit busy to continue my work on the tree, but after my exams I will continue to work on tree with Android 6.0 source. Hope it goes well.
DigiGoon said:
I'm a bit busy to continue my work on the tree, but after my exams I will continue to work on tree with Android 6.0 source. Hope it goes well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
good luck with your exams
Until then you can use this
New ROM for Honor 7 PLK-L01.
DigiGoon said:
Until then you can use this
New ROM for Honor 7 PLK-L01.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can we get a kitkat rom if your work with the device tree is done ? I really do miss kitkat[emoji20]
Sent from my PLK-TL01H using XDA-Developers mobile app
muhammad Shohayeb said:
Can we get a kitkat rom if your work with the device tree is done ? I really do miss kitkat[emoji20]
Sent from my PLK-TL01H using XDA-Developers mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will be developing AOSP 6.0, if others can give it a try then maybe we can get it.
I have the idea for an unified build from quite some time, but only now I'm trying to bring it to life.
Looking at LineageOS github and gerrit you can see that other devices (klte, m8) have the same stupid amount of variants, but they have merged them into one device repo.. So why can't this happen for the Note4?
Following their steps I've created an unified android_device_samsung_trlte (that includes SM-N910F/trltexx, SM-N910G/trltedt, SM-N910T/trltetmo, SM-N910W8/trltecan, SM-N910P/trltespr, SM-N910R4/trlteusc and SM-N910V/trltevzw), this proprietary_vendor_samsung and added this commit to the android_device_samsung_trlte-common that I'm currently using.
For now I'm able to use those repos to build a LineageOS-14.1 build that boots up, but w/o sim and camera being recognized.. For what I've tested (on trltexx) wifi and (strangely) bluetooth are working. Something is probably wrong with specific device blobs not being recognized/used properly.
It needs some work but I think this is a good base to start with.
trltexx/trltedt blobs are from here;
trltetmo/trltecan blobs are from here;
trltespr/trlteusc blobs are from here;
trltevzw is using trltespr blobs for now (there are no guaranteed working blobs repos for it at the moment, the only (WIP) way is to establish which are needed and extract them from hsbadr's builds).
The kernel is the same that I'm using for the not unified builds (android_kernel_samsung_trlte), at the moment testing if the klte's way of using the international variant defconfig works for us too.. other options are to add something like this commit to remove the need of a variant defconfig or merge the different defconfigs into one and use that instead.
Source:
unified_android_device_samsung_trlte
unified_android_device_samsung_trlte-common
unified_proprietary_vendor_samsung
android_kernel_samsung_trlte
I was going to share this anyway, but I'm sharing it now (even if there are still major problems) because I have a very limited free time where I can work on it, so, maybe, someone of you will join/fork/clone this project and help me out, finalizing it earlier and better (the support of experienced developers is needed and much appreciated).
I'm now going to mention the SeniorMembers/RecognizedContributors/RecognizedDevelopers that, maybe, have interest in this project.
@fattire @hsbadr @SaintZ93 @SferaDev @TheBr0ken @ZION959
If you get it to work, @_mone, I'll switch my daily builds to this unified one.
On a related matter, there seems to be a typo in the name of one of your repos: unified_andorid_device_samsung_trlte.
Let me also add @lilferraro to the list of devs, as I use his device tree to build for trltespr.
I built this and it boots, with the same issues you have (no SIM detected, camera is busted). Took a bunch of of logs. Getprop shows ro.build.fingerprint is trltetmo (which is right), ro.bootimage.build.fingerprint is trlte. Wifi and bluetooth are working. Mediaserver/libcameraservice service crashes repeatedly. I agree with you that having a unified tree for the entire Note 4 line is the way to go. I tried manually copying the blobs from /system/blobs/tmo/ to /system/lib and /system/vendor/lib but it didn't help.
what proprietary blobs did you use for sprint?
All device trees for the note 4 pie builds are up at
GitHub.com/tripLr-dev
User forum at Telegram
https://t.me/triplr_dev_users
Thanks to @_mone
And @ripee
I will do a test build of my Ubuntu Touch port using this unified repo and report back if anyone is interested. My port still needs a couple things to work but the stuff that works now should be enough to give me a good idea if it will work or not.
tigerpro357 said:
I will do a test build of my Ubuntu Touch port using this unified repo and report back if anyone is interested. My port still needs a couple things to work but the stuff that works now should be enough to give me a good idea if it will work or not.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let us know what you need
Source code
GitHub.com/triplr-dev
Contact me on telegram t.me/telegram to get you in touch with testers and developers. .
I am EXTREMELY interested in a touch port.
Thanks
Also GitHub.com/underscoremone for all the older stuff
I actually have my work on github already, I am also on telegram in the ubports groups, and if you would like to help my repo is probably the best place to start (unless you prefer duplicating work) I only have sensors and the stylus left for hardware (both of which I have been trying to get working) the stylus is an issue on the ubports side but I dont understand the code enough for mir. I haven't had a chance to test the unified repo yet, but I will once I have a few minutes to actually do it.
I wonder how it work to create xda threads for Ubuntu touch, since they seem to have their own forums.
I think adding Ubuntu touch to xda would be an additional resource for users and developers.
tripLr said:
I wonder how it work to create xda threads for Ubuntu touch, since they seem to have their own forums.
I think adding Ubuntu touch to xda would be an additional resource for users and developers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree, as all I really see on xda as far as Ubuntu Touch goes is prebuilt downloads which is good for letting people try it, but when I started I initially looked into xda but found no help. I do hope to see that change in the future though
Nice to see someone actually wanting to still develop for this device.. I love this Note4 still.
doubledragon5 said:
Nice to see someone actually wanting to still develop for this device.. I love this Note4 still.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here
We have several developers for note 4 snapdragon and exynos
T.me/triplr_dev_users
See you there
Roms
Tiny.cc/triplr
Tiny.cc/ripee
And many links in XDA for ROM threads
Post comments in XDA, and bug reports and logs in telegram
Android 10 in progress
Thanks @_mone
The lineage-17.1 thread is up!
[ROM][UNOFFICIAL][10] LineageOS 17.1 [tblte][trlte][trlteduos]
If you don't mind not having a working fingerprint sensor, or audio through the headphone jack, then Q is stable enough for daily use. As always when coming from an older rom version, it is highly recommended not to waste your time dirty flashing and just clean flash.
Q is still a work in progress, so I will still be releasing Pie builds, though maybe not as often. As in years past, once the Q bugs have been fixed up to the current Pie level, I will post about when my last Pie build will be. I will upload it to the Downloads tab located at the top of each page of this thread, and link it in the OP.
As we all know, official Android upgrades for the Nokia 6.1 Plus have ended with the Android 10 update and we will only be getting security patches going forth. However, some of us have the drive and desire to try out newer releases of Android, but we can't exactly shell out more money for a new device that will receive those updates.
Some of you might be aware that to make Android 11 (and beyond) ROMs a reality, any device needs a Device Tree and a Vendor Tree, and currently, there are no full trees for our device.
That's where I come in - again some of you might already be aware, but I have been working on full device and vendor trees for this device, with proper commit histories (flashbacks) so as to maintain order in the community. The trees are WIP, but the progress can be followed in the links below.
Device Tree
Vendor Tree
My current roadmap is as follows (I will update this list as and when I finish those things)
1. Finish the Device Tree by adding "configs," "rootdir," "ramdisk," and "symlinks"
2. Work on the Vendor Tree and pull missing blobs from the device
3. Build and test LineageOS with my trees - 31st build tested, device boots, sensors RIP
4. Maybe build other ROMs till android 11 arrives
Hoping to extend the life of this device,
Sid
Stonks
He attac,
He protec,
But most importantly
He got our bac
cocacola pepsi,
sid bhaiya sexy!
Cheers bro, I'm all for this!
Bumping the thread since I'm halfway done.
Also noticed another dev is close to releasing "source built vendor."
Dear dev, I challenge you to make your trees public.
Sid127 said:
Bumping the thread since I'm halfway done.
Also noticed another dev is close to releasing "source built vendor."
Dear dev, I challenge you to make your trees public.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do it I am with you Coca Cola Pepsy developer :silly:
Moderator Information
Hello OP, I have moved this thread from Development to General as there is no ROM available yet. Please report this thread or contact me again if you have a ROM and kernel source links available, I can move this into Development section then.
Thanks.
Regarding the recent sparks of controversy and mods being involved and a certain someone posting this on their public channel -
Forgot to say few kids started doing criticism again better my answer do by your own or learn from scratch
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have only one response to the
message - I HAVE done it by myself and I HAVE learned from scratch, and my trees (which can be viewed by anyone) are evidence of the same. My GitHub history can be followed to see exactly HOW I learned too - my modifying Motorola (Chef) trees.
Also, one question for everyone - considering we had vendorless builds for our device since Android Pie, am I the only one who finds it suspicious that said dev built vendor sources only around the same time I did? I just would like to take a look at said Dev's work and verify.
Cheers,
Sid
Bumping thread since I finally made progress
After 31 excruciating builds, I'm abandoning my trees. My vendor repo got taken down in a DMCA notice for a proprietary library, and I just don't have the motivation to continue on my Device Tree after being seemingly stuck on a device which boots but nothing works. My tree is still gonna be up on my GitHub for anyone to refer to. As for ROMs, the Official LOS trees work great and that's what I'll be using for builds. Though I didn't finish what I started, I learned a lot and am thankful for the journey.
Cheers,
Sid
Edit: vendor repo is up again and I have removed the disputed lib
I wish you had maintained it as you've already done most of the work. What is the end node of device trees which marks its completion?
Volski_ said:
I wish you had maintained it as you've already done most of the work. What is the end node of device trees which marks its completion?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will try and maintain it, but they've been abandoned for the time being... with Android R on the horizon, it didn't make much sense to spend countless hours trying to fix Android 10 trees. Device trees can be called complete when ROMs built using them are stable enough for daily use with every function working as intended.