HTC DROID DNA how far can Overclock and safe O.C? - HTC Droid DNA

hello guys im new here and i want to ask how far... the CPU can Overclock without Risk... and i know that a safe O.C is 1.7GHz but use 1.89GHz is good? and how far the Phone is goiing to handle this and the life of the Phone? as i know overlock a Video CArd,CPU can make more short the life of the Device... so is the same with this phone? i know the The Qualcom CPU is 1.5GHz but the normal Speed is 1.7GHz... i dont know why HTC DOWN CLOCK THE CPU... if the CPU can Handle 1.72GHz

darkhelio said:
hello guys im new here and i want to ask how far... the CPU can Overclock without Risk... and i know that a safe O.C is 1.7GHz but use 1.89GHz is good? and how far the Phone is goiing to handle this and the life of the Phone? as i know overlock a Video CArd,CPU can make more short the life of the Device... so is the same with this phone? i know the The Qualcom CPU is 1.5GHz but the normal Speed is 1.7GHz... i dont know why HTC DOWN CLOCK THE CPU... if the CPU can Handle 1.72GHz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure how far you can OC this device, but the reason they usually underclock slightly is twofold, heat and battery life. The higher the CPU clock speed, the more heat generated, and the lower the battery life.

codeprimate said:
I'm not sure how far you can OC this device, but the reason they usually underclock slightly is twofold, heat and battery life. The higher the CPU clock speed, the more heat generated, and the lower the battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok thanks bro

It is completely device dependent. Some people could be unstable at 1.7 while others could be fine at 1.89.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app

Ok veo thanks
Sent from my HTC Droid DNA using xda premium

What are you guys using to OC? Any app on the market or is there an HTC prefered app?

SetCPU is probably the most popular and to be 100% honest Overclocking is harmful to these devices there is a reason why HTC decided to place the clock speed at 1.5GHz... there isnt enough cooling provided to really push it past the limits but to each thier own I guess... Ive done it before and I really havent found it to increase the overall usage to my device... I had my old phone OC'd to 1890MHz and the only thing that changed was the benchmark numbers the normal day to day stuff still stayed the same like switching between apps and what not...

.torrented said:
SetCPU is probably the most popular and to be 100% honest Overclocking is harmful to these devices there is a reason why HTC decided to place the clock speed at 1.5GHz... there isnt enough cooling provided to really push it past the limits but to each thier own I guess... Ive done it before and I really havent found it to increase the overall usage to my device... I had my old phone OC'd to 1890MHz and the only thing that changed was the benchmark numbers the normal day to day stuff still stayed the same like switching between apps and what not...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with that. I'm mostly interested in lowering the CPU speed for better battery life. Was curious of what everyone was using. I currently have the NoFrills CPU Control app. Although it is very basic, it does the trick. I've been running 1ghz max and battery life has greatly increased. If I feel the need for speed, I just set it back to 1.5ghz. As you said, I haven't found a need to go beyond that.

Same here, OCing increased benchmark scores but no noticeable difference when using it. And when it got hot (really fast when OCing and benchmarking) the thermal protection pulled the reins in and scores plummeted.
You just need to get rid of the bloat and unused services, or install a slimmed down rom.

Kernal to use for OC?
Im running [ROM] DNA Super Stock 2.06.605.1_710R v1.0 4/24/13
is there a kernal I can flash to OC my DNA? i tried to change my cpu Mhz but it wont budge
I want to use this rom: [17.01][DNA/X920D/E][ROM][GSM][GLOBAL] Virtuous DNA+ v.2.0.0 [Sense 4+ / OC / Stable]
--but it doesnt support VZW
thanks

Chenzo57 said:
Im running [ROM] DNA Super Stock 2.06.605.1_710R v1.0 4/24/13
is there a kernal I can flash to OC my DNA? i tried to change my cpu Mhz but it wont budge
I want to use this rom: [17.01][DNA/X920D/E][ROM][GSM][GLOBAL] Virtuous DNA+ v.2.0.0 [Sense 4+ / OC / Stable]
--but it doesnt support VZW
thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Beastmode Kernel
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2021714

Related

[Q] How hot is too hot?

I installed the webtop over hdmi mod on my Atrix and while testing it out, it got very warm in my hand. I opened the setcpu app and noticed that while overclocked to 1.3GHz, the CPU was running at 75C! I lowered it back down to the stock 1GHz and the temp slowly went down and settled at 63C.
It seems that while in webtop mode, the CPU is taxed at 100% all the time so I'm wondering if it's safe to stay overclocked when using webtop.
Everyone has different opinions of what is too hot around here.
IMO the cooler the better. IMI No Atrix should have a temp above 60c and I'm not even comfortable with above 50c either...
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
I have experienced the same problem and worried that something may fry.... I have had mine overclocked at 1.45 using debian linux and all of a suddent he phone freezes and restarts.... Since it did it to me the second time I have kept my phone at 1Ghz... I am new at this so please don't beat me up too bad for being a noob... Just want to see if maybe undervolting it a little might help or hurt it?
Thanks in advance
Here are some tips I can offer
1.Try re-flashing your custom kernel and see if that fixes the web-top thing and over heating
Whenever the phone is plugged to the web-top it will naturally overheat so it's kinda expected remember now it's gotta work harder since its displaying on lap-dock or TV,but if you can cook an egg on it it might be too hot...lol
2.Set profile for temperature on setcpu so this way once you reach for example 100F your phone will clock down a little and so it might help the heat issue.You can set even more than one temp profile so this way when it reaches 96 it goes down a little then when it reaches 100 it will clock down a little more and such.
3.If that doesn't help,which in my situation it did.Flash a different kernel mayb it's just the one you're using that is causing funny stuff to happen.
Edit: not sure but i think undervolting helps battery but causes more heat,I myself don't undervolt I just created litterally a bunch of setcpu profiles for battery level,screen off,incall,charging,temp,and time and I'm getting 13 hour days at 1.3Ghz and temp profiles have been helping by clocking down when it's too hot therefore saving battery and drastic overheating.I dontlike my phone going anything over 104F it gets me paranoid,but that's just me.
I tried reflashing the kernel but it didn't change anything. I'm using Faux's 1.3GHz overclock kernel for Gingerbread (2.6.32.9). Is there something else I should be using?
sk8trix said:
Edit: not sure but i think undervolting helps battery but causes more heat,I myself don't undervolt I just created litterally a bunch of setcpu profiles for battery level,screen off,incall,charging,temp,and time and I'm getting 13 hour days at 1.3Ghz and temp profiles have been helping by clocking down when it's too hot therefore saving battery and drastic overheating.I dontlike my phone going anything over 104F it gets me paranoid,but that's just me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do what sktrix said in rest of his post.
I use the stopgap 1.0GHz kernel, and UV does lower temperatures. I would definitely try UV'ing a wee bit. You don't need to go crazy. I am using the following with great results for both temp and battery life:
-50
-50
-75
-75
-75
-100
-100
My setcpu profile clocks it back if I reach 60C, (I idle in the low to mid 30's). Under heavy load I reach around 52C max which is quite acceptable.
Now, granted I am not using Webtop, but the end result for UV should be the same. Lower temps and better battery life. You may also want to try just using 1.0GHz when on Webtop. The phone has more than enough power at this clock speed.
There is a bug with faux's kernel that causes the webtop to clock the phone at max speeds until restart.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
I know I'm straying from my correct forums here, however I have an LG Optimus 2X which like the Atrix, is a Tegra 2 CPU.
Our phones get VERY hot, I have had my CPU up to 86C before I decided to back off the stress test. CPUs are very good at handling high temperatures, and IMO you will see no ill effects from doing so, I am unsure of whether or not the Tegra 2 has thermal throttling/shut down, but in my experience they should be fine to around 80C.
The only issue I can forsee is the battery, batteries HATE high temperatures and it is awful for their life span, this is why your laptop batteries turn to crap after 1-2 years, even if low charge cycles, because they are always hot.
I would not be concerned about anything in the 70C realm, at all.
Alcapone263 said:
There is a bug with faux's kernel that causes the webtop to clock the phone at max speeds until restart.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Experienced this countless times. More with the latest 1.45Ghz, but it did happen on the previous release. When I dopped the mhz with setcpu, it wont scale but stay at max cpu. It even did it a few times without using the webtop.
g2tegg said:
Experienced this countless times. More with the latest 1.45Ghz, but it did happen on the previous release. When I dopped the mhz with setcpu, it wont scale but stay at max cpu. It even did it a few times without using the webtop.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So which overclocked kernel is best for webtop? I too have noticed where the CPU hangs at 100% at 1.45Ghz for a while when disconnected but it is always there when im in webtop mode.... How is Faux 1.3Ghz kernel with webtop?
ericemir said:
So which overclocked kernel is best for webtop? I too have noticed where the CPU hangs at 100% at 1.45Ghz for a while when disconnected but it is always there when im in webtop mode.... How is Faux 1.3Ghz kernel with webtop?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It will still hang at 1.3ghz, though it's a known bug. I just stick with the 1.0 enhanced, there's no noticeable real-world difference from going over 1.0ghz anyway, it's just a benchmark gimmick. Right now, the software that's out there is optimized to run on existing hardware w/o overclocks. I've run Shadowgun at 1.45ghz and didn't see any difference over the 1.0 enhanced.
Now, if we were trying to run games that were coded specifically or faster-paced chipsets then we'd need overclocking to catch up much like you would in the PC arena. That, however, is not happening in the cell phone market just yet.
treehumper said:
I just stick with the 1.0 enhanced, there's no noticeable real-world difference from going over 1.0ghz anyway, it's just a benchmark gimmick.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's the advantage to running a custom kernel if you're not overclocking? Forgive me if this is a stupid question lol. Still a noob.
cjrhoades said:
What's the advantage to running a custom kernel if you're not overclocking? Forgive me if this is a stupid question lol. Still a noob.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bump.
Anyone?
cjrhoades said:
Bump.
Anyone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Read the history at the following:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=15387385&postcount=1
You will see a lot more optimization than just upping the clock speed. One of the reasons the 1.0GHz kernel works much better than the stock kernel. Also, the ability to undervolt saving battery life.
IMO there is no need for 1.3GHz or 1.45GHz in everyday use of a phone. The only benefit is for OC'ing bragging rights. Until we can control phone temperatures better, it's pointless to risk the substantial heat increase on ALL internal components for extended periods of time which results from much increased CPU temperatures.
CaelanT said:
Read the history at the following:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=15387385&postcount=1
You will see a lot more optimization than just upping the clock speed. One of the reasons the 1.0GHz kernel works much better than the stock kernel. Also, the ability to undervolt saving battery life.
IMO there is no need for 1.3GHz or 1.45GHz in everyday use of a phone. The only benefit is for OC'ing bragging rights. Until we can control phone temperatures better, it's pointless to risk the substantial heat increase on ALL internal components for extended periods of time which results from much increased CPU temperatures.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see... guess that explains why the phone doesn't really feel any faster when it's overclocked. I'll flash the 1GHz kernel then.
Thanks for the info.
Not sure if this is the same with phones but normally a CPU should stay at 40C idle and 50C load. Maximum would be 60C while benching or something.
If it goes above that I would definitely underclock/undervolt.
cjrhoades said:
what's the advantage to running a custom kernel if you're not overclocking? Forgive me if this is a stupid question lol. Still a noob.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
also has other fixes besides overclocking you can go read them in the kernel threads

overcloking pros and cons??

hey guys i install custom karnel on my xpera mini...now i can overclock up to 2 ghz..i just wanted to know pros and cons of overclocking..
pros- increased speed and less lagging,
cons- short battery time, increased temprature.
Is it possible to underclock it to get more battery or shelf life from the phone?
we can overclock and underclock if we install custom karnel..
wynradaure said:
Is it possible to underclock it to get more battery or shelf life from the phone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah. Root your phone, and install SetCpu, and you can Underclock freely and thus save lots of battery
akshay13071990 said:
hey guys i install custom karnel on my xpera mini...now i can overclock up to 2 ghz..i just wanted to know pros and cons of overclocking..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Overclock will give you temporary boosts and lets you to showoff, and to get super high benchmark scores , but its not for regular use
Overclocking reduces battery performance and increases heating of device, which might cause your device to get unstable
and of course high temp = bad for the hardware so be careful
My SE mini works very well at 1610 Mhz.No crash,no instability but I use high frequency for max 2-3 hours or when I want to play without lagging
Pros
Immensely fast speed
Massive score on Quadrant
No lag or crashes
Cons
Battery life goes down fast
Phone temp goes up - Massive problem
Phone might get bricked if the phone gets unstable (Happened to my friend)
I only overclock my phone whenever I play games or need to switch between apps constantly. Though I always keep on 1024 as that is the default setting
Recently I overclocked to 2ghz was chkin stability and gosh I burned my battery, its workin but fone keeps restarting n I had to buy new one!! Dis is d con
Pro: faster n better performance!!
Overclock can cuz serious damage too!! But its fine to showoff a lil but in controlled envionment for a short tym!
sent from mangoe's eii
Overclocking is not actually advisable because there are chances that it will affect your phone and might screw it up in the long run .
Battery drain is inevitable and you will experience it .
Phone will heat up
It may not be good for the other internal components because of the over heat-unlike computers a mobile is not actually equipped with much of cooling system.
There is a good reason why the manufacturer has set a clock speed ,otherwise isn't it better for them to just overclock a phone and sell it for a higher price ?
People who design the custom kernels are just telling the maximum possible value they could overclock to.
Pros-
Bigger numbers
Little more faster performance
it recommended to not overclock always..just overclock when you really need it..
What are peoples thoughts on a modest overclock to bring me back up to the performance I am used to?
Say taking an ACTIVE up to 1300 or so.
With these new NON-OC kernels, are they undervolted? I have seen claims of absolutely massive battery life and I'm reasonably sure some of those were using cpu throttling and an overclock.
So confused at this point. Also heard some of the newer ACTIVE handsets cannot even be rooted.
bandario said:
What are peoples thoughts on a modest overclock to bring me back up to the performance I am used to?
Say taking an ACTIVE up to 1300 or so.
With these new NON-OC kernels, are they undervolted? I have seen claims of absolutely massive battery life and I'm reasonably sure some of those were using cpu throttling and an overclock.
So confused at this point. Also heard some of the newer ACTIVE handsets cannot even be rooted.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As in most things if you not overdo it you can enjoy the benefits of better performance without risking your phone.My xperia mini is running up to 1200 (1024 stock). Also minimum speed 122 instead of 245.So better performance when you need it and lower consumption when phone is sleeping.Overall i got the same battery life, 2-3 days as with stock rom.The best thing to do is get an app that lets you make profiles.Like when screen is off min cpu 122 - max cpu 384 etc...
I don't know about these new kernels you're talking about but cpu throttling is something stock kernels do also (if by cpu throttling you mean cpu speed adjustment)

Is There Any Point Of Overclocking?

Hey fellow XDAers
I'm currently running LeeDroids awesome GSM Rom, with his Kernel and a lot of others the stock speeds are 384mhz - 1.51ghz (using LagFree governor).
I'm just wondering is there any point of having it boosted from 1.18ghz to 1.51ghz or is it just overkill? I can see the Sense UI is slightly smoother, but I'm not really sure how the battery life is affected by the OC.
If I wanted to save battery life, would it be best to reduce it back to 1.18ghz or use a different governor (and what one?)
Thanks in advance,
Louis
Gsm and cdma processors default speeds are different?
overclocked
lhayati said:
Hey fellow XDAers
I'm currently running LeeDroids awesome GSM Rom, with his Kernel and a lot of others the stock speeds are 384mhz - 1.51ghz (using LagFree governor).
I'm just wondering is there any point of having it boosted from 1.18ghz to 1.51ghz or is it just overkill? I can see the Sense UI is slightly smoother, but I'm not really sure how the battery life is affected by the OC.
If I wanted to save battery life, would it be best to reduce it back to 1.18ghz or use a different governor (and what one?)
Thanks in advance,
Louis
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes i read overclocking do take a toll on ur battery just like an engine more horsepower/cylinder more gas lol if u really need the extra speed try juce defender or something to help save you your battery while over clocking. Hope this helps
I keep mine at 1.2ghz max as it is fast enough like that, and makes the battery last longer.
Yeah point off overclocking is that we don't need buy an new device to get some extra speed. But I think on 1.2 it runs fine to.
No sorry, I think I worded that incorrectly. I mean with custom Kernels they usually are 1.51ghz by default.
oohaylima said:
Gsm and cdma processors default speeds are different?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh and do people know if by default it's 1.18 or 1.21? I know it's not much difference, but i'm a little ocd
lhayati said:
Oh and do people know if by default it's 1.18 or 1.21? I know it's not much difference, but i'm a little ocd
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1.18ghz /10char
If you want insane speed is what you gain tho you don't gain better battery life More speed the less life... . Both cores running all the time will eat it up.
If you push it too high you can burn it up.. Depends on what you want outta things...
Well the second core isn't so active as far as I know. It has been more designed to jump in when needed.
But reason most custom roms include an overclock off 1.51Ghz is because the cpu was designed for it, HTC just under clocked it, but in the HTC Sensation XE they not underclocked it.
lhayati said:
No sorry, I think I worded that incorrectly. I mean with custom Kernels they usually are 1.51ghz by default.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah, I see now. I get what you're saying now. Overclocking is good, but becomes detrimental when the freq starts sucking the life out the battery.
Aren't we underclocked from the jump. I though Chad Goodman said the actual processor speed is 1.5 by default. Per Qualcomm specs at least.
Sent from my Clean Rom'd HTC Flyer using XDA Premium.
In short, yes.
OC'ing makes your phone much faster and, also helps out with benchmarks. However, battery saving is not an issue either. Most CPU control apps will allow you to set a different frequency when the phone is closed so it saves batter. For example, I'm on zr3d right now and my normal profile is 1.7x ghz. When the screen is off, it scales conservatively from 192 to 540 mhz. Gives better performance and better battery.
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using XDA Premium HD app
jdeoxys said:
In short, yes.
OC'ing makes your phone much faster and, also helps out with benchmarks. However, battery saving is not an issue either. Most CPU control apps will allow you to set a different frequency when the phone is closed so it saves batter. For example, I'm on zr3d right now and my normal profile is 1.7x ghz. When the screen is off, it scales conservatively from 192 to 540 mhz. Gives better performance and better battery.
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol That will save you life when your screen is off but not when your running a game or hammerin away at stuff
OC beyond Quallcoms spec 1.53ghz is pointless and good for nothing but killing your battery. There are a great many here who gush over high benchmarks but that means absolutely nothing in "real world" performance no matter how much they tell themselves that it does. Just sayin....
Thanks for all your reply's
But for the average use (browsing, video streaming, bit of gaming, messaging) what should I set as my max OC as? And what is the best governor for battery + performance.
troyboytn said:
OC beyond Quallcoms spec 1.53ghz is pointless and good for nothing but killing your battery. There are a great many here who gush over high benchmarks but that means absolutely nothing in "real world" performance no matter how much they tell themselves that it does. Just sayin....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope.jpeg. I was playing canabalt the other day at 1.5X ghz. It was the tiniest bit choppy so I upclocked to 1.7. Perfect performance and, also real world performance I believe(actually it's a game so its not real life).
Best settings I'd say would be 1.5 ghz on interactive/intellianthrax guvner while screenon and .5 or .3 ghz conservative/powersave while screen off. Or, for heavy stuff, go all the way up to 1.7/1.8 ghz.
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using XDA Premium HD app

crank it up.

now hat we're unlocked lets overclock and undervolt and see if we can get 10k quadrant and a week out of the battery..lol
no but seriously how much do you guys think we can turn this thing up (overclock) and it be stable? (like its really needed..i cant get it to lag now as it is) once we get a kernel that is
blackbass595 said:
now hat we're unlocked lets overclock and undervolt and see if we can get 10k quadrant and a week out of the battery..lol
no but seriously how much do you guys think we can turn this thing up (overclock) and it be stable? (like its really needed..i cant get it to lag now as it is) once we get a kernel that is
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1800 is a VERY good starting point.... I ran a kernel when I had the International variant and it was FAST!! I think it was called "Bullet" kernel...?
blackbass595 said:
now hat we're unlocked lets overclock and undervolt and see if we can get 10k quadrant and a week out of the battery..lol
no but seriously how much do you guys think we can turn this thing up (overclock) and it be stable? (like its really needed..i cant get it to lag now as it is) once we get a kernel that is
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was looking stuff up on that today. The highest I could find documented was 1900 on the cpu and 800 on the gpu.
For everyday usage, overclocking is useless, even for gaming. Undervolting can be beneficial, but from what I've seen, the latest processors get approximately the same battery life on stock voltage as they do undervolted.
imnuts said:
For everyday usage, overclocking is useless, even for gaming. Undervolting can be beneficial, but from what I've seen, the latest processors get approximately the same battery life on stock voltage as they do undervolted.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hey thats good to know...like i stated though. if there ever was a phone that needed over clock this one IS NOT it. i cant bog it down right now and believe me ive tried. someone out there might can but i cant.
imnuts said:
For everyday usage, overclocking is useless, even for gaming. Undervolting can be beneficial, but from what I've seen, the latest processors get approximately the same battery life on stock voltage as they do undervolted.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just like to play around with different kernels but the kernel I was using def made the device snappier and I had some killer benchmarks! But you are right though! Custom kernels on this device is not really necessary...
I plan on building a custom kernel then, hopefully tomorrow night or possibly Saturday. I do have some plans to improve it, but nothing related to the CPU or GPU going faster, just having other stuff operate better and getting rid of anything not needed.
shojus said:
1800 is a VERY good starting point.... I ran a kernel when I had the International variant and it was FAST!! I think it was called "Bullet" kernel...?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hope I don't get another lemon CPU... my TBolt's would only overclock to 1.4G, anything above and it locked up.
DaWolf850 said:
I hope I don't get another lemon CPU... my TBolt's would only overclock to 1.4G, anything above and it locked up.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's better than me. I could run 1200 for weeks but at 1400 about every other day it would restart randomly.
IvanNCase said:
That's better than me. I could run 1200 for weeks but at 1400 about every other day it would restart randomly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HA. My TBolt stayed stable at 1200, but ANYTHING higher than that and it would crap out on me.
I could run my bolt stable at 1700 all day. Kept it at 14 for a month no issues. Stayed at 13 the rest of the time. Course at 17 it was like it was running on a watch battery with the amount of time it would last. Lol
Eh I ran 1.6Ghz on my Thunderbolt 24/7 and with the 2750mah battery it lasted me days.
On a phone like that there was a significant improvement to the end user that justified the overclock. Now on the Note 2 I'd expect there to be very few who would want an overclock at all. I am part of the very few however. I play a lot of emulators on my phone and for N64 and Playstation I need all the raw CPU power I can get. Yep, even on this beast of a phone I still get some lag and stuttering on those emulators. The reason being is the same as PC gaming. AMD thinks that by adding more and more cores to their processors they can win the performance arena. Unfortunately they are wrong. Intel has the right idea, 4 cores is plenty now let's improve the efficiency and performance of those specific cores.
Same goes for our phones. Quad core is the most I'd ever want in my computers, anymore is just a waste. Now let's get better architecture for the processor to maximize clock-for-clock performance. And overclocking those cores helps it in apps that don't support more than one or two cores, because the baseline performance for each core is boosted.
So yeah, can't wait for a 1.8Ghz kernel

[Q] Any Fix for Laggy Wildblood by Gameloft?

Hi,
I just finished installing and launching wildblood 1.1.0(lates ver.) i noticed that it is very laggy even in max CPU Clock 1700GHZ.
Anyone know how to fix, or knows where i can find one.. :3
btw im using stock kernel.
gigzterebirth said:
Hi,
I just finished installing and launching wildblood 1.1.0(lates ver.) i noticed that it is very laggy even in max CPU Clock 1700GHZ.
Anyone know how to fix, or knows where i can find one.. :3
btw im using stock kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Overclocking the CPU to improve gameplay is pretty much irrelevant unless you just want to keep your hands warm. If you want better frame rates you should overclock the GPU but even still the you shouldn't expect huge results as unfortunately the mali 400mp4 is getting a little old these days and at the stock gpu freq it just isn't powerful enough, but overclocking to 530 or 600mhz does make the game feel more responsive at the expense of the usual trade off with overclocking such as heat and battery life.
Wrong section, post in QA

Categories

Resources