International N7100 kernels on i605 (VZW)?? - Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note II

So there aren't very many kernel options for AOSP/CM ROMs on the VZW Note 2. Does anyone know if kernels for the International Note 2 (N7100) would work on the VZW i605?

Check out Imnuts' PeanutButta Jelly...running it since Friday and it's great.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2154378

tfly212 said:
Check out Imnuts' PeanutButta Jelly...running it since Friday and it's great.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2154378
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's for TW ROMs, not AOSP/CM. I asked in his thread if he would create an AOSP/CM version but haven't gotten a response yet.

Ah...sorry. Missed that part. Good luck in the search.

My guess would be no and don't try. You can always ask the developer try a pm see if they respond. What do you need a new kernel for? It usually is a bad idea to screw with the kernel as it can cause major problems if you do something wrong.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda premium

DJ1994 said:
My guess would be no and don't try. You can always ask the developer try a pm see if they respond. What do you need a new kernel for? It usually is a bad idea to screw with the kernel as it can cause major problems if you do something wrong.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes but new kernels can often greatly increase battery life and otherwise improve performance while adding features...

I have never really experienced that except with over clocking. And neither of those is a problem in this phone.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda premium

strikeir13 said:
So there aren't very many kernel options for AOSP/CM ROMs on the VZW Note 2. Does anyone know if kernels for the International Note 2 (N7100) would work on the VZW i605?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In short yes. But flash the LTE version kernels (N7105)

Related

4.0.1 and 4.0.3 Leak out for Int'l S II

Same source as the last "official" leak.
These two are also Touchwizzed.
http://www.sammobile.com/2011/12/31/exclusive-2-new-android-4-0-1-and-4-0-3-roms/
jcracken said:
Same source as the last "official" leak.
These two are also Touchwizzed.
http://www.sammobile.com/2011/12/31/exclusive-2-new-android-4-0-1-and-4-0-3-roms/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I feel a bit excited.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
I could honestly care less about these as roms I just want aosp/cm9 on my phone so I hope these help codeworkx and the team
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
Nick281051 said:
I could honestly care less about these as roms I just want aosp/cm9 on my phone so I hope these help codeworkx and the team
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you could care less, then you should start carrying less.
Oh, you mean you could NOT care less. Got it.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
Nick281051 said:
I could honestly care less about these as roms I just want aosp/cm9 on my phone so I hope these help codeworkx and the team
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you do know that these leaks are what givs the developers the resources to make the aosp builds work correctly rite?
sEnT fRoM mY ExYnOs PoWeReD MoNsTeR
No kernel source, so of little use to I777.
The fun starts when we get kernel source.
Entropy512 said:
No kernel source, so of little use to I777.
The fun starts when we get kernel source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly. Even on CM9 alpha, I777(GB) modems do not allow audio in calls(everything else works). Like you mentioned, seems like RIL/modem interface is broken making GB modems useless at the moment.
mike21pr said:
you do know that these leaks are what givs the developers the resources to make the aosp builds work correctly rite?
sEnT fRoM mY ExYnOs PoWeReD MoNsTeR
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you didn't read the "I hope these help codeworkx and the team" and they did they fixed the ril
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
Nick281051 said:
you didn't read the "I hope these help codeworkx and the team" and they did they fixed the ril
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ril is fixed for I9100 users(EU version), not for us I777 users yet, until we get kernel source.
eep2378 said:
Ril is fixed for I9100 users(EU version), not for us I777 users yet, until we get kernel source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kernel source will not likely help us with RIL/modems - but it might allow us to reverse engineer the RIL interface and figure out what's wrong.
Either way - it's not looking good if GB modems don't work. Either way - without kernel source, too much is broken to even start.
Entropy512 said:
Kernel source will not likely help us with RIL/modems - but it might allow us to reverse engineer the RIL interface and figure out what's wrong.
Either way - it's not looking good if GB modems don't work. Either way - without kernel source, too much is broken to even start.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We may be in luck - the i9100 users were/are using gingerbread modems on their ICS builds. I may try the latest KK6 with it today without modification.
akira02rex said:
We may be in luck - the i9100 users were/are using gingerbread modems on their ICS builds. I may try the latest KK6 with it today without modification.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried KK6, KH7, and KJ1 yesterday with no luck. Give it shot if you want. Those users are also on using the I9100 not the I777(I believe that the issue for us)
More on this here(post 1357):http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1410400&page=136
So I9100 users can use GB modems, but I777 users cant? According to the referenced post above we cant use I900 modems but they can use ours?
I saw a video of how this looks. Samsung Sucks. The TW makes ICS looks exactly the same as Gingerbread. Can't wait until a stock ICS rom works..
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
akira02rex said:
We may be in luck - the i9100 users were/are using gingerbread modems on their ICS builds. I may try the latest KK6 with it today without modification.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's good news - if I9100 users can use GB modems, that means that only the audio output libs may be a problem for us once kernel source is released. This could be a pain to deal with, but hopefully the same Samsung Noise Reduction hacks that worked on Sammy-based ROMs could be ported to CM.
Entropy512 said:
That's good news - if I9100 users can use GB modems, that means that only the audio output libs may be a problem for us once kernel source is released. This could be a pain to deal with, but hopefully the same Samsung Noise Reduction hacks that worked on Sammy-based ROMs could be ported to CM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I checked out the phone.apk for the correct references in the xmls and noise suppression was gone already from what I could see. This was in the latest airbus build ala cm9.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
akira02rex said:
I checked out the phone.apk for the correct references in the xmls and noise suppression was gone already from what I could see. This was in the latest airbus build ala cm9.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM builds don't have noise suppression control in the first place - so it would have to be added and then set, since the default doesn't work for us.
Come on, it's just a leak, isn't it?
I bet the official tw will be much better.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777
eep2378 said:
I tried KK6, KH7, and KJ1 yesterday with no luck. Give it shot if you want. Those users are also on using the I9100 not the I777(I believe that the issue for us)
More on this here(post 1357):http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1410400&page=136
So I9100 users can use GB modems, but I777 users cant? According to the referenced post above we cant use I900 modems but they can use ours?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was referring to a thread on XDA for the i9000 (NOT i9100) users. They were using gingerbread modems on their ICS builds.
But, in regards to data I had no issue with the latest build from airbus (cm9) using a modem built for the i9100. Sadly, in audio calls did not work. Has anyone experimented using Google Voice instead as a workaround?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUP8TBIveic
4.0.3 WITHOUT touchwiz
pham818 said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUP8TBIveic
4.0.3 WITHOUT touchwiz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok now I felt like I was just teased
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777

Looking for testers for a ROM

If you are interested and able to provide helpful feedback, I am looking for a few testers. My rom is based on 2.3.4 and is seriously debloated (120MB). If you need stock apps, this rom may not be for you.
What base is it? (not just android version)
penguinlogik said:
What base is it? (not just android version)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
UCKH7 base
UCKH7 modem
Siyah 2.6.7 kernel
Oh damn... that is tempting. I got the absolute best battery life on UCKH7, but man, switching roms is so much work, and the one I currently have is really stable. If only I had an extra SGSII
penguinlogik said:
Oh damn... that is tempting. I got the absolute best battery life on UCKH7, but man, switching roms is so much work, and the one I currently have is really stable. If only I had an extra SGSII
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's alright, I'm sure others will want to give it a try.
Making another swirl into the ROM business I see brother...welcome back
Yea, I'm actually on my 7th revision of this rom
I'll bite. With nandroid what is there to lose?
Sent from my Galaxy S II (i777)
I like 2.3.4
I like kh7
I like siyah 2.6.7
Count me in!
I would like to try it, might as well because I could test and then nandroid back to my current rom!
Sent from the depths of College Station
I would like to test it out. I have the whole weekend to try something new.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
I'm interested but not too interested in Siyah kernel. No offense to any devs I'm just a lot happier with Entropys DD Kernel.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
AntwanL said:
I'm interested but not too interested in Siyah kernel. No offense to any devs I'm just a lot happier with Entropys DD Kernel.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can flash Entropy's kernel after flashing the ROM.
Sent from myphone.
Just to let everyone know there are known issues with this ROM which is why I am doing private testing. Everyone uses their phone differently and I am always surprised at what kind of feedback I get. I will PM everyone with the download link and all you need to do is PM me back your findings.
jazzboyrules said:
You can flash Entropy's kernel after flashing the ROM.
Sent from myphone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha I know.
But if Siyah was the intended kernel my test won't be consistent with what is expected.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
AntwanL said:
Haha I know.
But if Siyah was the intended kernel my test won't be consistent with what is expected.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You could let me know if using DD has a negative effect on the rom. But I guess you'd have to use it at least once with siyah in order to compare.
ryude said:
You could let me know if using DD has a negative effect on the rom. But I guess you'd have to use it at least once with siyah in order to compare.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't mind giving Siyah another go, why not
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
If you need more testers let me know. I'll play around with it and try a bunch of stuff. Can i drink beer while i do it?
No more testers until the next release. Everyone has been extremely helpful in finding bugs so I thank all of you.
Cool, good luck with it, bro.

(SOLVED) Kernel Recommendation

I'm rooted running stock ics and am looking for an oc kernel. I will consider switching to a custom yet stockish rom in order to accommodate the kernel suggestion.
Please.... I know you've seen this thread before, but I've comed over the development section, searched my ass off, and yes, even Google this.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
why are you so desperate for an OC kernel?
what doesn't your phone do with a stock kernel?
Because I want my new note to run as well as my old note, but I don't want to run the same rom.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
no 2 phones are the same; setup your new phone exactly the way your old one was, and see if it works exactly like the first one..
adding an kernel that you can OC is NO GUARANTEE that your phone will run "better"..overclocking often causes issues, and based on a lot of your posts that I have read, you probably should not bother with overclocking at this point..
What post have you read that suggest that I don't need an oc kernel at this point? Why are you so against me over clocking my phone. This is my 3rd note and my first 2 ran a hell of a lot better over clocked. I'm convinced that it makes a difference, so do you have a suggestion for me in regards to a specific kernel?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
I'm on stock ICS and I use this kernel. I have never OC'd it though. I only use it for BLN functionality.
LittleRedDot said:
What post have you read that suggest that I don't need an oc kernel at this point? Why are you so against me over clocking my phone. This is my 3rd note and my first 2 ran a hell of a lot better over clocked. I'm convinced that it makes a difference, so do you have a suggestion for me in regards to a specific kernel?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if you are on your THIRD note now, I assume its because you have bricked 2 of them?
wase4711 said:
if you are on your THIRD note now, I assume its because you have bricked 2 of them?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you have read so many of my posts why are you assuming anything? It sounds like you haven't read any of my posts. If you had you would know that I've never bricked a phone and both previous phones were sent back for charging port issues. It sounds like you've had a bad morning and are taking it out on me, please don't post unless you have a suggestion.
To the other poster, thank you for your recommendation, I'll look into it now.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
BlackZenith said:
I'm on stock ICS and I use this kernel. I have never OC'd it though. I only use it for BLN functionality.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh thanks mate! That kernel is working out for me!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2

Need for speed issues?

Does anyone else have an issue with need for speed most wanted? It lags like crazy for me on cleanrom 3.5 with the stock kernel.
Runs perfect for me on stock
willlay said:
Does anyone else have an issue with need for speed most wanted? It lags like crazy for me on cleanrom 3.5 with the stock kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try Perseus kernel and see if the lag goes away.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
Stock kernel here. Running smooth.
Sent using Tapatalk
DroidOnRoids said:
Try Perseus kernel and see if the lag goes away.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^^this and also make sure to overclock your gpu to 733 or 800
Sent from my Vzw galaxy note 2 running beans rom
I've noticed lag on stock too.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda app-developers app
nnnnr14 said:
^^this and also make sure to overclock your gpu to 733 or 800
Sent from my Vzw galaxy note 2 running beans rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Overclocking anything by that amount is a terrible idea
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda app-developers app
I find it funny that people need to overclock for something that runs fine on stock.
Maybe you should just remove the offending party, be it rom or kernel?
adrynalyne said:
I find it funny that people need to overclock for something that runs fine on stock.
Maybe you should just remove the offending party, be it rom or kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kind of like supercharging a Ferrari. All you're showing me is how small it really is...
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
adrynalyne said:
I find it funny that people need to overclock for something that runs fine on stock.
Maybe you should just remove the offending party, be it rom or kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's your ROM of choice?
BennyJr said:
What's your ROM of choice?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm just using a joint project thing between me and imnuts.
I think he is releasing it soon if he hasn't already.
I guess ill try the perseus kernel after work and see what it does.
Runs fine on rooted stock.
I'm on beanstown's rooted stock deodexed ROM with stock kernel, runs just fine for me.
It's retarded that the AI cops only ever go after YOU and leave the other AI racers alone. What the hell, EA?
Please read forum rules before posting
Questions go in Q&A
Thread moved
Thank you for your cooperation
Friendly Neighborhood Moderator
I just got max payne, nfs most wanted , and gta 3 last night (theyre all $0.99 right now.) Im on beans build 4 stock kernel and they all run fine. It took forever to download the extra files on the rockstar games but other than that its all good.
Sent from my SCH-I605

ATT kernel source code released

http://www.androidpolice.com/2013/0...ng-with-the-long-lost-thunderbolt-ics-source/
Curious to see what changed so I'm downloading it now but man is it slow. Is everyone at xda downloading it now or something? Usually 100MB is quick on my connection.
Also keep in mind 1.26 may be older than 1.29 but the revision .10 is newer than .3 so this may have some benefit.
Update: International firmware just got source code released for .12. Let's see what happens tonight. This could be interesting. .12 I believe has the touchscreen fix in it!
CheesyNutz said:
http://www.androidpolice.com/2013/0...ng-with-the-long-lost-thunderbolt-ics-source/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So what is the significance of the release of this kernel for those of us who may not understand?
kayone73 said:
So what is the significance of the release of this kernel for those of us who may not understand?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is primarily useful for kernel developers who mod the stock kernel.
GermanGuy said:
It is primarily useful for kernel developers who mod the stock kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok i'll rephrase my question:
What performance benefits can one gain from tweaking/modding a stock kernel?
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
kayone73 said:
Ok i'll rephrase my question:
What performance benefits can one gain from tweaking/modding a stock kernel?
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lots of different tweaks that developers work on, it all depends - saving battery life, better color reproduction, overclocking with possible better performance and...and....and...

Categories

Resources