So I've installed paranoid android and I'm pretty happy with it (especially being able to use the camera again!) but I'm wondering if CM10 might not be faster on my YP-G70 or more stable.
Has anybody out there tried both and found one to be faster or more stable than another?
dstarfire said:
So I've installed paranoid android and I'm pretty happy with it (especially being able to use the camera again!) but I'm wondering if CM10 might not be faster on my YP-G70 or more stable.
Has anybody out there tried both and found one to be faster or more stable than another?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello,
They both consist of the same bugs, since Paranoid is based on the CM10 Rom. Any biased feed back about peoples personal experiences might not be of best interest.
Hope this answers your question.
dstarfire said:
So I've installed paranoid android and I'm pretty happy with it (especially being able to use the camera again!) but I'm wondering if CM10 might not be faster on my YP-G70 or more stable.
Has anybody out there tried both and found one to be faster or more stable than another?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They are built from the same device tree and are nearly identical except for PA enhancements.
Use both and see which one is better?
Paranoid is a good choice
Related
Just got a brand new Razr Maxx on the cheap! So excited to have freedom from my charger! Made the switch from galaxy nexus just because of the battery life. Anyways, I have rooted the device and installed safestrap 3.0, and I want to install CM10 but I don't know the difference between Kexec and Stock type builds. Can someone please explain the differences for me? From what I've read I think maybe kexec builds can run custom kernels? I did a bunch of searching but I'm clueless still. Although rombitch.com is down, I found a download page on goo.im for hashcode's cm10 builds here (http://goo.im/devs/Hashcode/spyder/cm10). Does hashcode upload the same builds as the ones on rombitch.com/spyder, or does anyone have a link for the latest version? Are there any drawbacks from going OEM stock to CM10? From older posts i found in my search battery life and signal issues were present but I'm curious what you all think currently. I am pretty happy with the stock motoblur ics and bloat apps removed surprisingly, but after just 1 day of use I'm already eager to try and get the purest android experience.
Thanks
Wes
wtfmate913 said:
Just got a brand new Razr Maxx on the cheap! So excited to have freedom from my charger! Made the switch from galaxy nexus just because of the battery life. Anyways, I have rooted the device and installed safestrap 3.0, and I want to install CM10 but I don't know the difference between Kexec and Stock type builds. Can someone please explain the differences for me? From what I've read I think maybe kexec builds can run custom kernels? I did a bunch of searching but I'm clueless still. Although rombitch.com is down, I found a download page on goo.im for hashcode's cm10 builds here (http://goo.im/devs/Hashcode/spyder/cm10). Does hashcode upload the same builds as the ones on rombitch.com/spyder, or does anyone have a link for the latest version? Are there any drawbacks from going OEM stock to CM10? From older posts i found in my search battery life and signal issues were present but I'm curious what you all think currently. I am pretty happy with the stock motoblur ics and bloat apps removed surprisingly, but after just 1 day of use I'm already eager to try and get the purest android experience.
Thanks
Wes
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know the differences other than stock is what is in the OTA ICS builds?
But I do know that what is on goo should be identical to what's on rombitch and rombot.
Sent from my CM10 XT912
Yes kexec can run custom kernels but the builds currently have some big issues, especially the lack of deep sleep so it kills your battery. Moving to cm10 you lose the ability of web top, HDMI, and screen rotation animation.
Full-Throttle Team
moderator at bdhroms.freeforums.org
prsterero said:
Yes kexec can run custom kernels but the builds currently have some big issues, especially the lack of deep sleep so it kills your battery. Moving to cm10 you lose the ability of web top, HDMI, and screen rotation animation.
Full-Throttle Team
moderator at bdhroms.freeforums.org
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
also I believe that camera is not working in kexec roms
thanks alot everyone. I got a stock-cm10 build up and running with safestrap v3 and it's running great.
wtfmate913 said:
thanks alot everyone. I got a stock-cm10 build up and running with safestrap v3 and it's running great.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did u use Hashcode Rom? I run it in slot 1 and LOVE it. Never a problem. Camera works great!
Hmm I'm on a kexec rom (LiquidSmooth) and deep sleep is working great and the camera also works flawlessly.
Edit: I just realised that OP was created ages ago
Hello there. Yes I have hashcodes ROM installed but at the moment I'm running the new AOKP build that is newly posted. Hashcodes works great but for some reason I still get a problem with the ROM getting stuck at a black screen sometimes when I boot and I can't figure it out. Tried older safe strap version. Deleted ROM slot1 completely...fresh installs...fixed permissions....and I still get that problem.
Comparison
Camera on stock roms is better
also the stability is better on stock roms rarely any crashes
some stock roms give the ability to use some of the motorola goodies.
whereas with kexec u get
smoother UI and android 4.2.2
Innovative features like integrated pie controls and customization( try liquidsmooth)
and also the ability to overclock with the use of the JBX OCE kernel by dtrail1
<---hit thanks if i helped any of u! :laugh:
Gautam Padirooted said:
Camera on stock roms is better
also the stability is better on stock roms rarely any crashes
some stock roms give the ability to use some of the motorola goodies.
whereas with kexec u get
smoother UI and android 4.2.2
Innovative features like integrated pie controls and customization( try liquidsmooth)
and also the ability to overclock with the use of the JBX OCE kernel by dtrail1
<---hit thanks if i helped any of u! :laugh:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kexec does not have FHD video recording, not even HD, only SD works for now. Well, you can use LG camera and it does work Full HD but it is not a standard app. Newer dtrail kernels are very stable, I have not had a reboot for over a week, just look @ some screenshots in his kernel thread. CM10.1 is very fast, very overclockable (1.5Ghz in my case) while vanilla rom (ICS or JB) are less overclockable (up to 1.35Ghz) and slower on top of that. They offer some futures not found in CM - webtop mode and working HDMI for example (not to forget about FHD recording).
Debloated vanilla rom would be a good compromise, especially with some custom launcher.
mat9v said:
Kexec does not have FHD video recording, not even HD, only SD works for now. Well, you can use LG camera and it does work Full HD but it is not a standard app. Newer dtrail kernels are very stable, I have not had a reboot for over a week, just look @ some screenshots in his kernel thread. CM10.1 is very fast, very overclockable (1.5Ghz in my case) while vanilla rom (ICS or JB) are less overclockable (up to 1.35Ghz) and slower on top of that. They offer some futures not found in CM - webtop mode and working HDMI for example (not to forget about FHD recording).
Debloated vanilla rom would be a good compromise, especially with some custom launcher.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is this vanilla ROM of which you speak?
Sent from my XT912 using Tapatalk 2
garywojdan81 said:
What is this vanilla ROM of which you speak?
Sent from my XT912 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Those are Motorola roms.
mat9v said:
Those are Motorola roms.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, never heard stock ROMs referred to that way.
Sent from my XT912 using Tapatalk 2
mat9v said:
Kexec does not have FHD video recording, not even HD, only SD works for now. Well, you can use LG camera and it does work Full HD but it is not a standard app. Newer dtrail kernels are very stable, I have not had a reboot for over a week, just look @ some screenshots in his kernel thread. CM10.1 is very fast, very overclockable (1.5Ghz in my case) while vanilla rom (ICS or JB) are less overclockable (up to 1.35Ghz) and slower on top of that. They offer some futures not found in CM - webtop mode and working HDMI for example (not to forget about FHD recording).
Debloated vanilla rom would be a good compromise, especially with some custom launcher.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All of this will be fixed, be patient, hashcode is working on it! And yes I do prefer Cm 10.1 over stock rom to be honest. I never had any issues with cm 10.1 RC2.
HDMI, webtop and 1080p recording is on his todo-list and I am confident that he will fix it.
I'm not worried or dissatisfied, was just answering a question really I'm using CM10.1 myself and really happy with it.
mat9v said:
I'm not worried or dissatisfied, was just answering a question really I'm using CM10.1 myself and really happy with it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know just answering some of question for members who have not tested cm 10.1 and are worried about the performance
wtfmate913 said:
Hello there. Yes I have hashcodes ROM installed but at the moment I'm running the new AOKP build that is newly posted. Hashcodes works great but for some reason I still get a problem with the ROM getting stuck at a black screen sometimes when I boot and I can't figure it out. Tried older safe strap version. Deleted ROM slot1 completely...fresh installs...fixed permissions....and I still get that problem.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same black screen problem here with AOKP on slot 2- BMM.
and there're same complains on same problem with cm and liquidsmooth
Hi all,
I keep reading but I don't seem to find a definite answer for this question. I read somewhere that because of i9300 processor (samsung didn't reveal the codes or sth) the performance and battery life on Custom ROM based on AOSP and CM is not as satisfactory as Stock or Touch-wiz based roms.
Is this true? I love to use CM but the battery indeed seems to drain faster. Any idea of when i9300 users might get to use solid AOSP or CM based ROMs?
Thanks mates!
I am curious about this too. It seems that AOSP ROMS will always be imperfect as long as the Exynos codes arent released.
PAING1990 said:
Hi all,
I keep reading but I don't seem to find a definite answer for this question. I read somewhere that because of i9300 processor (samsung didn't reveal the codes or sth) the performance and battery life on Custom ROM based on AOSP and CM is not as satisfactory as Stock or Touch-wiz based roms.
Is this true? I love to use CM but the battery indeed seems to drain faster. Any idea of when i9300 users might get to use solid AOSP or CM based ROMs?
Thanks mates!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have messed around with a few ROMS (mainly sammy based one's) and using a SAMMY ROM with a new launcher is a strong base.
Why not start by finding a good sammy based ROM (i'm using Viking ROM although may switch to HyperLight) get a nice setup, then you can simply backup and mess with ASOP & CM yourself knowing you have a rock solid alternative to fall back on.
You can make up your own mind then ^^
PAING1990 said:
Hi all,
I keep reading but I don't seem to find a definite answer for this question. I read somewhere that because of i9300 processor (samsung didn't reveal the codes or sth) the performance and battery life on Custom ROM based on AOSP and CM is not as satisfactory as Stock or Touch-wiz based roms.
Is this true? I love to use CM but the battery indeed seems to drain faster. Any idea of when i9300 users might get to use solid AOSP or CM based ROMs?
Thanks mates!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cm10 is rock stable and has better battery life than sammy. (For me) but camera has some problems. Just try it. You can always revert it to sammy
themate1987 said:
Cm10 is rock stable and has better battery life than sammy. (For me) but camera has some problems. Just try it. You can always revert it to sammy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM10 is still nightly build right? I tried some ROMs like slimbean and liquid smooth but the battery performance is significantly not as good as stock. Am i right?
Yes right...
The stock ROM gives awesome battery life...
I tried CM10 but it seems to drain battery faster...i mean not that faster...
On my galaxy sl i9003 you cant even imagine what actually battery drain is....
Life 7hrs and gone but on my S3 the battery is OK about a day or day and a half and still 34% left !!
Sent from my Galaxy SL !! (Y)
simratcs said:
Yes right...
The stock ROM gives awesome battery life...
I tried CM10 but it seems to drain battery faster...i mean not that faster...
On my galaxy sl i9003 you cant even imagine what actually battery drain is....
Life 7hrs and gone but on my S3 the battery is OK about a day or day and a half and still 34% left !!
Sent from my Galaxy SL !! (Y)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wah. A day and a half??? I can't even achieve it with stock rom. What kind of tweaks do you use?
I just rooted a while ago and have just been flashing ROM this and that. Have never tried custom kernels or mods.
Would love to hear some tweaks that will last me 1.5 days with CM10. haha. Share with me bro.
If you can tolerate the few minor issues/glitches here and there, nothing beats CM10.
sidthegreatest said:
If you can tolerate the few minor issues/glitches here and there, nothing beats CM10.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
dualboot: the best solution
sidthegreatest said:
If you can tolerate the few minor issues/glitches here and there, nothing beats CM10.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
okay. So i do not need any kernel and tweaks for excellent battery life is it?
tried so often cm9&cm10, lately slimbean.
was AOSP fan on my desire, but not on the s3 (yet)
none of them made me stick to AOSP for more than 1week...
too many "bugs" - minor things who annoyed me like: **** camera&video (unstable), battery life, calling bugs (low voice volume) etc
ive to admit that slimbean + siyah kernel beats everything, the battery life is rly nice (nearly liek sammy roms). siyah kernel helps alot concerning the battery life on AOSP!
still ive to use a sammy rom cuz of stability and reliability.
id look forward to a fully working AOSP rom, hopefully soon.
themate1987 said:
Cm10 is rock stable and has better battery life than sammy. (For me) but camera has some problems. Just try it. You can always revert it to sammy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What good is a ROM that is stable (as in doesn't crash) but ISN'T fully functional (as in has issues w/ hardware) ?
I want a ROM that is both stable and fully functional, even if it isn't the benchmark champion.
For me, the stock ROMs offer the best of the 2 worlds: they are stable and functional.
Yeah, let the flame start, but I am yet to see an AOKP/AOSP/CM ROM that doesn't have a single issue with hardware.
So, stock ROMs for me are the winner.
I use NOVA Launcher Prime, BTW, but the TouchWiz that came with today's stock JB (France, XEF) is extremely fast and as customizable as Nova Launcher.
Simonetti2011 said:
What good is a ROM that is stable (as in doesn't crash) but ISN'T fully functional (as in has issues w/ hardware) ?
I want a ROM that is both stable and fully functional, even if it isn't the benchmark champion.
For me, the stock ROMs offer the best of the 2 worlds: they are stable and functional.
Yeah, let the flame start, but I am yet to see an AOKP/AOSP/CM ROM that doesn't have a single issue with hardware.
So, stock ROMs for me are the winner.
I use NOVA Launcher Prime, BTW, but the TouchWiz that came with today's stock JB (France, XEF) is extremely fast and as customizable as Nova Launcher.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is miui rom that offers sammy+miui experience. I think it's called rayglobe, but it's based on 4.0.4 so it is never as smooth as jb
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
So, I'm not an Android N00B or even a CyanogenMOD N00B -- I'm just a Motorola N00B. I've been hacking CM9 on HTC and Samsung phones for years so I don't need any "how-to" help.
I've gone through the forum here and I can't make heads or tails about what the general consensus is about different ROM's.
I don't need (or even want, really) Jelly Bean so I'm looking for a pretty vanilla (but solid) CM9 ROM.
Also, are there any issues with different radios and call quality? I ran into that a lot on the T989 (TMobile Galaxy S2) and I'd like to avoid it if I can.
svet-am said:
So, I'm not an Android N00B or even a CyanogenMOD N00B -- I'm just a Motorola N00B. I've been hacking CM9 on HTC and Samsung phones for years so I don't need any "how-to" help.
I've gone through the forum here and I can't make heads or tails about what the general consensus is about different ROM's.
I don't need (or even want, really) Jelly Bean so I'm looking for a pretty vanilla (but solid) CM9 ROM.
Also, are there any issues with different radios and call quality? I ran into that a lot on the T989 (TMobile Galaxy S2) and I'd like to avoid it if I can.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Performance, working features and stability have come along way since cm9. I'd be looking at epinter's cm10 or cm10.1. But there are camera / video camera issues with all including cm9. If you want cm and with all things working then it would be cm7. Once we have a new kernel the cm9/10/10.1 roms will finally be fully optimized.
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk 2
jjwatmyself said:
Performance, working features and stability have come along way since cm9. I'd be looking at epinter's cm10 or cm10.1. But there are camera / video camera issues with all including cm9. If you want cm and with all things working then it would be cm7. Once we have a new kernel the cm9/10/10.1 roms will finally be fully optimized.
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ICS ROMs based running on the leaked kernel are pretty good too, and include all the features except fingerprint reader and Lapdock support, the cons may be the battery life (Sometimes problematic AFAIK) and stability (Only for a little handful of users).
There is a CM10 ROM based on the leaked kernel but it's no longer under development, I think you'll prefer using ICSrom in that case.
Slymayer said:
ICS ROMs based running on the leaked kernel are pretty good too, and include all the features except fingerprint reader and Lapdock support, the cons may be the battery life (Sometimes problematic AFAIK) and stability (Only for a little handful of users).
There is a CM10 ROM based on the leaked kernel but it's no longer under development, I think you'll prefer using ICSrom in that case.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is there one that you suggest? :angel:
I am currently on MIUI v5 (latest one) and one thing I hate abtou MIUI is the amount of available ram I have. I am constantly facing crashes if I try to run music app along with Google Maps or any two apps simultaneously.
I get a feeling that every 4.4 rom around is still "under development" or so i think. I have tried to flash the 4.3 roms but they're too "heavy" for the system. I am looking for something light yet stable.
So my question is whether it's worth flashing a 4.4.2 rom or staying at aosp 4.3 rom until a stable version of 4.4 is released by any of the mastermind devs out there.
Please do not close this thread as I am obviously not asking about the "best" rom but rather the version of android.
Any help?
I think 4.4.2 is pretty stable for example Slimkat, it is already in RC Status.
Or try Cyangoen Mod M4.
mischa_martin said:
I think 4.4.2 is pretty stable for example Slimkat, it is already in RC Status.
Or try Cyangoen Mod M4.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I indeed know that 4.4.2 is pretty much an upgrade over 4.3 aosp roms but my main question was, what does it offer over 4.3, for everyday use, which can persuade me to choose.
shad0wboss said:
I indeed know that 4.4.2 is pretty much an upgrade over 4.3 aosp roms but my main question was, what does it offer over 4.3, for everyday use, which can persuade me to choose.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
4.4 has a much lighter system requirements so ur phone shld technically have more free ram and less sluggish than 4.3
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Hej guys,
at the moment I'm running my Xperia Pro with:
CyanogenMod version: 10-20130103-UNOFFICIAL-iyokan
Android version: 4.1.2
Kernel: 2.6.32.9-FXP
Build number: cm_iyokan-userdebug 4.1.2
I'm running it for around a year now and I'm really not satisfied with the performance and stability. Everything is really not snappy, apps take really long to load and I've to wait to use it! Using Maps or Chrome is a hell and not reliable when I need them. (Most of my apps are on SD and I don't think I'm experiencing memory problems.)
When I set up the phone last year I tried in the beginning the "newest" available Android version at that time and sticked to it. I guess this was my fault. Now I want to fix this and get finally the best performance and reliability and wanted to ask you for help. I think a downgrade is the best solution. Perhaps also to a custom and minimal rom. Do you have any suggestions what I should use? I would like to go for cyanogen again but I'm open for input. What are you using?
Thanks in advance, I'm looking forward to your suggestions.
I use the newest ultimate hd (ics) and it runs fast enough with phone overclocked to 1,4ghz. I'd suggest u try it if you haven't already.
Sent from my MK16i using xda app-developers app
CarbonRom
I've been looking into KitKat roms, and I just flashed the CarbonRom.
So far, I'm really happy with the stability and the performance.
Though keep in mind I've OCed to 1.4gHz.
Along with all the features involved, I think it's one of the best roms I've tired in the past few years!
From my experience, these ROMs are the fastest, great performance and with great battery life out of all I've tested so far:
ICS: Xperia Ultimate HD (awesome battery life)
JB: (4.1.2) Super JellyBean and (4.3.1) LegacyXperia 10.2
KK: CarbonROM
You should, of course, flash many and see for yourself which one matches your expectations. And I haven't tested all (yet, haha. ), but from the ones I have, those are the best for <me>. And maybe don't expect too much, there's only a number of things software can do (or improve) when the hardware is very limited.
Currently I'm between CarbonROM and LX 10.2 and I think they're both pretty great and stable.
for me one of the best was superjellybean.. very fast,very smooth, and kitkat themed
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2134257
:good: