Share your Experiance Of Differant Android Versions On Optimus One - Optimus One, P500, V General

Share your experience with different android versions on our beloved optimus one ...
here is mine
2.2 (official) = best battery life and Stability
2.3(official)=decreased battery life compared to 2.2
2.3(Cm7)=Amazing perfomance , best for gaming
4.0 (cm9)= Decreased perfomance compared to 2.3 but better than jellybean
4.1(cm10)=Smooth compared to ics and ginger bread , but battery life is not good as we could get in gb or ics
4.2(cm10.1)=Smooothest......
camera quality decreased compared to ics , gb and jb 4.1
i felt that the best one is GB for all over perfomance...
like gaming and battery life
Sent from my HTC-Butterfly using xda premium

---

would be sweet if we would have 2.2 with some new tweaks and jb theme
it would have greatest battery life with minimum ram consumption, decent speed and it would look like jelly bean.
what else does an average user need?

---

I like stock gb most!
2.2 It was the best!
2.3- most stable with least bugs. can be used with custom kernel, which is a best combination for stability and performance. ( my current running rom )
2.3.7- light weight, fast with least bugs and themes for cm7 make it look great too!
4.04 pure cm9- I like the Google talk of ics and the themes too, Rom lags a bit, camera is not so promising.
4.1- I have never used it
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda app-developers app

---

2.2 stock Rom is good but voice recording sucks
2.3 stock battery life very bad, audio recording bad
2.3 cyanogenmod is slow but stable
4.0 cm9 best Rom in my opinion, fast stable, good battery life
4.1 smooth and fast, would be best if it had good battery life
4.2 worst battery life
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda app-developers app

---

2.2-bad, stable and a medium performace for a simple user
2.3 LG - the baterry life is awesome but have.some issues and good performance
2.3.7 cm - exelent performabce but the baterry life lost an 15%
4.0.4 cm9.2.1 - exelent best performance and stability and baterry is like gb
4.1.2 - bad :/
4.2.2 - is really awesome but need fix the baterry drain and stability
Enviado desde mi LG-P500h
CM9.2.1 sorry for my bad english
Saludos desde Mexico

---

2.2 stable
2.3 best camera, great battery
2.3.7 fast, good battery
4.0 a bit slow compared to 4.1
4.1 I have been using aokp 4.1.2 and right now i have 78% of battery after 14h50mins of use. I make some calls, alot of sms, watched smth like 30mins of a movie in mx player, listened to some music. I think its a great, its fast and it doesnt spend alot of battery and least compared to what im used in other 4.1.2 roms
4.2 Smooth but bad battery life

---

Sent gran my LG-P500 using xda premium
2.2 great battery & perfomance
2.3 médium battery médium performance rare FC
4.0 until now the best
4.1 4.2 sucks battery performer audio lags FC dsp problemas
Sorry for my poor english

---

2.2 Used for abt 1 month aftr buying phone then nvr flashed it
2.3 -stock based- bug free good battery (thundervn kernel)
2.3.7 -more features more bugs
Phone.apk fc'ed many times and i missed imp calls
4.0.4 -Epicness unleashed...little more battery consuming....camera exposures need to b fixed
4.1/4.2 - Not perfect but does the job.
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda app-developers app

---

2.3- Excellent battery life with Francos Kernel :good:
4.0.1 - This was a CM rom and was one of the best :highfive:
4.1.x - CM10, buggy as hell:silly:
4.2.2 - AOKP Bytecode's version, excellent so far! Been running it for about 2 hours now, replaced the stock launcher with nemus launcher.:good:

---

2.2 Never used it, when booted the first time, got an update, upgraded to 2.3
2.3 Stock - stable, average battery life
4.0 the best - stable, customizable, good battery life with 3.x kernel.
4.1 - battery drain :|
4.2 - needs stability and improving battery life

---

Use right click to fix typing errors on thread name
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium

---

Left4DeadMW said:
Use right click to fix typing errors on thread name
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But I use it on phone
No pc
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium

---

2.3 More stable
I feel 2.3 is the most stable and has better performance.

---

2.2 - best battery life ,horrible performance
2.3.3 (stock) -good battery life ,average performance
2.3.7-(cm7.2)-best performance , average battery life
4.0.4- smooth , good battery life with 3.x kernels
4.1.2 -smoothest,best audio quality,mediocre battery
4.2.x -worst of the lot crappy performance with crappy battery
Sent from my GT-N8000 using xda app-developers app

---

2.2=average battery, average performance.
2.3 LG stock = good battery than froyo but little low performance
2.3.7=good battery, good performance, best roms imo
4.0.4=smooth but limited multitasking due to more ram usage, average battery
I didn't try 4.0 builds with 3.x kernels.
4.1 and 4.2 not tried...

---

Share your experience of different etc...even standard android has typo mistakes suggestion
Sent from my LG-P500..

---

My experience with P505
Froyo = antiquated, but usable if all you require is a simple smart phone
Gingerbread (Stock) = Less antiquated with more options, but stock is so proprietary which I don't appreciate
Gingerbread (2.3.7) = All the plusses of stock Gingerbread with more customization and less proprietary. Excellent battery life.
ICS (4.0.4) = non-proprietary with more options and much more pleasing UI. RAM consumption can be a negative, but using the V6 Supercharger scripts seems to really give a boost. As for battery life, I am still getting about 2 days of usage which is more than ample as long as I'm using one of sweetnsour's .35 kernels.
JB = Beautiful user interface and similar RAM consumption to ICS, however battery drain still needs to be tackled for me to consider using it as a daily driver. Work with the 3.0.x kernels may be promising with increasing both battery drain and performance.
I use the LG Phoenix P505, so most ROMs require me to flash a P505 compatible kernel so my options are a little more limited.