hotcakez kernel versions - AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717

Does anyone know if the newest kernel in Flapps CM10.1 Kang the same as the 3.1.2 experimental kernel or is it an updated version?

ishken said:
Does anyone know if the newest kernel in Flapps CM10.1 Kang the same as the 3.1.2 experimental kernel or is it an updated version?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Flapp is still a dev but focused on a new biz he's starting. The current kernel release is the 3.1.2 version.
pm sent btw.

Based on his forum, looks like he reverted back to a earlier kernel. If your on his ROM just use one of those many apps to determine the current kernel.
$ø|\/|£ťhïñğ ¢ű$ț¤|\/| ⁴.².²

Related

[Q] AOKP vs Resurrection ICS!

Hi
I am looking for a stable but feature filled ROM as I am going for vacations. The most recent version 2.4.1 of resurrection ICS seem to have some issues as per the comments. So I wanted to know whether the issues are the same in stock AOKP? and shall I go for AOKP stock rather than resurrection ICS if I want a stable build?
shaxter said:
Hi
I am looking for a stable but feature filled ROM as I am going for vacations. The most recent version 2.4.1 of resurrection ICS seem to have some issues as per the comments. So I wanted to know whether the issues are the same in stock AOKP? and shall I go for AOKP stock rather than resurrection ICS if I want a stable build?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the other aokp rom is rootbox
but the bugs in aokp are in all the rom which are aokp based
as aokp team dosin support s2 officially
shaxter said:
Hi
I am looking for a stable but feature filled ROM as I am going for vacations. The most recent version 2.4.1 of resurrection ICS seem to have some issues as per the comments. So I wanted to know whether the issues are the same in stock AOKP? and shall I go for AOKP stock rather than resurrection ICS if I want a stable build?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would recommend rootbox 1.3 with SiyahKernel. Very very good rom
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
believe me I tried most of all but hydra H2O so far is the best I ever had
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

[Q] CM version of Hellybean 02-26 build?

Hi
I wanted to use siyah on the new Hellybean 4.2.2 02-26 nightly build. But I was not sure if this had the new (post 2-21) CM 10 with the new Mali drivers. Does anyone know? How can I tell the version of CM this rom is using?
Thanks!
disector89 said:
Hi
I wanted to use siyah on the new Hellybean 4.2.2 02-26 nightly build. But I was not sure if this had the new (post 2-21) CM 10 with the new Mali drivers. Does anyone know? How can I tell the version of CM this rom is using?
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If u don't even know what version of the rom you're running then u got a lot of reading to do.
Sent from my Pink Unicorn stable
Thanks! Very helpful!
The build number is "cm_i777-userdebug 4.2.2 JDQ39 eng.derteufel1980.20130226.221711 test-keys".
The CynaogenMod version is "Hellybean-20130225-i777"
I wasnt sure if the dates in these referred to the Hellybean dev's own build or the CM version it was derived from.
Appreciate any education here.
disector89 said:
Thanks! Very helpful!
The build number is "cm_i777-userdebug 4.2.2 JDQ39 eng.derteufel1980.20130226.221711 test-keys".
The CynaogenMod version is "Hellybean-20130225-i777"
I wasnt sure if the dates in these referred to the Hellybean dev's own build or the CM version it was derived from.
Appreciate any education here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe.... I dunno... PM the developer of the ROM?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2

ViperX+ 2.0.1 with Sweep2Wake

Hello folks,
I am a fan of the ViperX+ Rom and I recently updated to 2.0.1.
Everything works fine except the Sweep2Wake option which isn't available.
Seems like the original kernel does not support this like the EliteKernel does. But the EliteKernel won't work with Sense5.
Is there any way I can get Sweep2Wake running on the current Rom?
not until kernel source is released.
Phoenix09 said:
not until kernel source is released.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
too bad
but thanks for the info mate

[Q] why are we still using linux kernel 3.0

linux kernel 4.1 released why are we still using 3.0? I am just wondering
nhmanas said:
linux kernel 4.1 released why are we still using 3.0? I am just wondering
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Porting a new linux kernel to a device is not simple. It brings a lot of stability issues if the kernel version is too new, and so most developers stick with a LTS release such as v3.4.104. Most s2 kernels are at kernel version 3.0.101 because it is found to be stable, and so they stick with the mentality that 'if it ain't broke, don't fix it'.
gsstudios said:
Porting a new linux kernel to a device is not simple. It brings a lot of stability issues if the kernel version is too new, and so most developers stick with a LTS release such as v3.4.104. Most s2 kernels are at kernel version 3.0.101 because it is found to be stable, and so they stick with the mentality that 'if it ain't broke, don't fix it'.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I really love your kernel and you are the new kernel master of i9100 now for me. Then why don't you use v3.4.104? My friend's phone is s4 mini and he is using a v3.4.x.x kernel. I think it is stable to use
nhmanas said:
I really love your kernel and you are the new kernel master of i9100 now for me. Then why don't you use v3.4.104? My friend's phone is s4 mini and he is using a v3.4.x.x kernel. I think it is stable to use
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Honestly, I think I don't have enough developing experience to do such task chhapil is also thinking to update linux version, but is also unsure whether to upgrade to a newer version or downgrade to 3.4.104.
gsstudios said:
Honestly, I think I don't have enough developing experience to do such task chhapil is also thinking to update linux version, but is also unsure whether to upgrade to a newer version or downgrade to 3.4.104.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for your replies. I have 2 more questions.
1. What are the pros of upgrading 3.4.104 kernel
2. So our device is official cm12.1 now and sources are online. Will you release a lollipop kernel?
nhmanas said:
Thank you for your replies. I have 2 more questions.
1. What are the pros of upgrading 3.4.104 kernel
2. So our device is official cm12.1 now and sources are online. Will you release a lollipop kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-s2/development-derivatives/kernel-dorimanx-lp-5-x-x-t3145879
nhmanas said:
Thank you for your replies. I have 2 more questions.
1. What are the pros of upgrading 3.4.104 kernel
2. So our device is official cm12.1 now and sources are online. Will you release a lollipop kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. Some pros of updating Linux kernel could include increased speed and security (since 3.0.101 kernels are not updated anymore) .
2. I guess you didn't see my Sig? Noppy already linked my dorimanx lp kernel thread. Yes, it works perfectly with cm12.1, however doesn't work yet on other roms like paranoid android and slimlp.
gsstudios said:
1. Some pros of updating Linux kernel could include increased speed and security (since 3.0.101 kernels are not updated anymore) .
2. I guess you didn't see my Sig? Noppy already linked my dorimanx lp kernel thread. Yes, it works perfectly with cm12.1, however doesn't work yet on other roms like paranoid android and slimlp.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
omg thats what I'm waiting for thanks for all mate

[kernel][unofficial][trim] [eol]apolo jb 4.1.2

The Background:​JB is far gone as of now, but i still love what Samsung delivered with JB 4.1.2 on my beloved SII.
Also @pedestre has stopped any more builds to the APOLO kernel.
I'm a maintainer for Dorimanx JB Builds but I also love APOLO kernel for its sability.
But now its missing some key features like TRIM,ISOREC and may be newer toolchains.
So these are my unofficial builds for the STOCKNEAT ROM.
DISCLAIMER:
ONLY FOR JB 4.1.2 Based Roms
No feature requests like add this governor or scheduler or other exotics. My idea is to keep this stable and key missing things
I'm not responsible for bricked devices or wrong version flashing
You are using this kernel at your own responsibility
——— !!!!!!!! YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED !!!!!!!! ———
FEATURES:
This kernel include the following additional features:​
* New Uber toolchain 5.3
* TRIM Enabled
CREDITS:
All credits to go original developer pedestre
Download
http://chhapil.github.io
XDA:DevDB Information
Unofficial Stock APOLO Kernel, Kernel for the Samsung Galaxy S II
Contributors
chhapil
Source Code: https://github.com/chhapil/Kernel-Apolo-JB-4.1.2
Kernel Special Features:
Version Information
Status: No Longer Updated
Current Stable Version: 4.22
Stable Release Date: 2016-05-06
Created 2016-05-07
Last Updated 2016-10-16​
Good work @chhapil, the only thing missing with apolo was trim, so a welcome development......
i flash today this kernel.works perfect. Thank you so much for your hard work !!!:good::laugh:
Great work..... Am on NeatRom and trim is indeed a welcome feature in Apolo .... Couldn't see IsoRec support in the feature list... Has it been implemented? ... Will be downloading and testing as well...
No IsoRec yet, the current ramdisk doesn't allow currant implementation of isorec. I don't have enough time plus as per Lanchon's suggestion I'll wait got better implementation of isorec
chhapil said:
No IsoRec yet, the current ramdisk doesn't allow currant implementation of isorec. I don't have enough time plus as per Lanchon's suggestion I'll wait got better implementation of isorec
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's fine... Take your time.... We're already lucky to get new supports for our quite old device....
chhapil said:
Version Information
Status: Stable
Current Stable Version: 4.22
Stable Release Date: 2016-05-06
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Vibration does not work!
Rufusin said:
Vibration does not work!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haven't faced this issue.
Vibration does not work as well as on the official apollo 15, not 15b
Rufusin said:
Vibration does not work as well as on the official apollo 15, not 15b
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
never had this issue, which ROM are you using?
chhapil said:
never had this issue, which ROM are you using?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Official I9100XWMS3
This is a known bug in the kernel apolo v. 4.15!
Apolo 4.15b for SAMMY JB ROMS (Removed vibration interface compared with 4.15)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 Please enable vibration again (if possible)
Vibration does work after a reboot but only for a minute or so.
Fwuffy86 said:
+1 Please enable vibration again (if possible)
Vibration does work after a reboot but only for a minute or so.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same problem for me
@chhapil apolo 4.22 work fine but not work vibration you fix it?or development stopped?
latino81 said:
@chhapil apolo 4.22 work fine but not work vibration you fix it?or development stopped?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure if I can fix it
Development I can not say stopped but I'm not working on this kernel as of now
EOL
End of life guys, cant give more updates or fixes.
Be at peace
Hello, @chhapil
I am testing 4.1.2 JB to see if it is faster than LOS micro-g. WHich kernel should I use to get twrp 3 ISOREC ? which kernel do you like most ?
Dorimanx JB 4.1.2 Kernel = Dorimanx-V8.47v059-JB-SGII
OR
APOLO JB 4.1.2 Kernel=Apolo-4.22_Regular-CWM
Currently I am on JB 4.1.2. stock I9100XWLSE and twrp v2.8.7
---------- Post added at 01:57 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:35 PM ----------
apprently, only the dorimanX for JB is compatible iwth ISOREC Twrp.
I installed it in TWRP 2.8.7, then insstalled TWRP 3.1, wiped cache+DATA, but the phone is in bootloop at the screen with SAMSUNG and the blue disc
Well i installed I9100XXLSJ and wiped factory reset in philz_touch_6.48, then installed your kernel and it works.... Now installing twrp 3 ISOREC !

Categories

Resources