Related
Hey
Stock camera vs CM7 camera quality? Comparison anyone?
Did anyone do comparison side by side, which one was better?
Thanks.
CM& camera is pretty ****ty imo and slower them stock samsung camera
smakked said:
CM& camera is pretty ****ty imo and slower them stock samsung camera
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 this is the sole reason why i dont use CM as my daily driver
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
cm & miui cameras are very poor related to Stock on..
In two words CM camera is "Epic Fail"
ricey1986 said:
+1 this is the sole reason why i dont use CM as my daily driver
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly the words I had in mind.Even the alternative camera apps in the Market don't quite satisfy me.
But people,it's AOSP camera,not CM7 camera.CM has nothing to do with it.Although we can all agree it sucks anyway.
Um, yeah and its an AOSP camera. Just like everything in CM7 is AOSP. Just like everything has been modified, including the camera.
I think that warrants justification enough to call it 'CM7' camera.
Necrolust said:
Um, yeah and its an AOSP camera. Just like everything in CM7 is AOSP. Just like everything has been modified, including the camera.
I think that warrants justification enough to call it 'CM7' camera.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really?Holy cow,I didn't know they had modified it.I looked into it a little and only saw that AOSP camera is even worse.Just as fugly,but with less features.Way to go Google!
I hope ICS camera is usable for Christ's sake...
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Call me stupid, but where do I find any info about the details of the nightlies to the CM9 on: http://get.cm/?device=p4wifi
I'm pretty happy with the one from 2 weeks back, but would gladly update if they're significant, e.g. working front cam
antic604 said:
Call me stupid, but where do I find any info about the details of the nightlies to the CM9 on: http://get.cm/?device=p4wifi
I'm pretty happy with the one from 2 weeks back, but would gladly update if they're significant, e.g. working front cam
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are a bunch if changelogs available on the net but to save you the hassle. Front cam doesn't work
Sent from my GT-P7510 using XDA Premium HD app
There is no CM9 out which is using the newest 3.1 Kernel. But try BeeGees CM9 Build, ist uses the new kernel where are the frontcam is working. Click me
I was pretty surprised to see a new nightly come out last night and still without a working camera yet the CM10 builds out there it does work.. Shame that the CM development for the tab is so spotty (at best).
http://changelog.bbqdroid.org/#p4wifi/cm9/
Thanks guys! Appreciated
styckx said:
I was pretty surprised to see a new nightly come out last night and still without a working camera yet the CM10 builds out there it does work.. Shame that the CM development for the tab is so spotty (at best).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pershoot is the device maintainer for out tabs for cm. Until he he is happy with sorting out a) - the bugs on kernel 3.1 then it'll be "Sent out" to cm who will then start using it to build frsh nightlies & probably cm10 ones aswell
Sent from my GT-P7510 using XDA Premium HD app
Hey guys, i want to move on from ICS to JB, I have seen that the flykernel is a pretty good one... Which rom is the best in terms of:
1. Battery life
2. Performance
3. Stable
Thanks a lot for your future tips or recommendations.
Valtrex11 said:
Hey guys, i want to move on from ICS to JB, I have seen that the flykernel is a pretty good one... Which rom is the best in terms of:
1. Battery life
2. Performance
3. Stable
Thanks a lot for your future tips or recommendations.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try CyanogenMod 10. Its stable, fast and almost everything working except front camera (It will work in future update)
you can also try p.a.c.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1803076
First hint : pac is the only one that has everything working, just sayin.
Kafka Datura said:
First hint : pac is the only one that has everything working, just sayin.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pac does not have front camera working, as far as I know..
xzeiP said:
Pac does not have front camera working, as far as I know..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Completely does, at least on my phone.
Ill try Pac, I hope everything is working there fine
My phone too. PAC is great but I can't get great battery life from it. Not disastrous life just a lot faster drain than the best ICS builds. Don't think it copes with the widgets i use.
Sent from my Xperia Ray using xda premium
Kafka Datura said:
Completely does, at least on my phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Originally Posted by xzeiP View Post
Pac does not have front camera working, as far as I know..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cam not working with face unlock and tango application for me. skype working,normal camera working too.
i use the rom in daily use,still the best for me. and i have no special fast battery drain.
Pac is the best
Sent from my Xperia Ray using Tapatalk 2
Not a commercial(or maybe it is), but try my Nyandroid AOSP Jally Bean, it's the only fully AOSP rom out there and it has fixed front camera (in release 3 wich is uploading ATM), and it is clean and pure AOSP.
flykernel for JB roms is the best?
Valtrex11 said:
flykernel for JB roms is the best?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How can you compare when one is a kernel and another is a rom?
IMO, PAC rom is the best. You get the best support on the thread, with every two weeks (more or less) updates and currently dev is building 4.2 roms. Have a go at it ^^
Valtrex11 said:
flykernel for JB roms is the best?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
p.a.c. and cm10 is rom that i suggest to use with flykernel v0.5a(jb)..for flykernel v.8 it support most ics rom..
first of all wrong section to post, there is a general or a q&a section but there is no such thing of best rom, best rom for me will prbably not suit you, and will be worse for you, and saying one is better than other is not ok for developers, try them all and choose the one you like more
It seems that the roms i have seen aren't fully functional.There's always something broken like the camera,Bluetooth etc.At least from the roms i see here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1720457
Could one of you guys give me a nice stable rom that has everything the stock has and more.I would like ICS but anything thats better than the stock is fine.Thanks.
Nitrosolid said:
It seems that the roms i have seen aren't fully functional.There's always something broken like the camera,Bluetooth etc.At least from the roms i see here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1720457
Could one of you guys give me a nice stable rom that has everything the stock has and more.I would like ICS but anything thats better than the stock is fine.Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
which player do you have?
also for future reference please post questions here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2283877
goldflame09 said:
which player do you have?
also for future reference please post questions here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2283877
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the Samsung Galaxy WiFi 5.0 (international version).
Nitrosolid said:
I have the Samsung Galaxy WiFi 5.0 (international version).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i far as i know, there is a way to use camera but as for bluetooth, i thought i was working. the only completely fixed roms you will find are GB
also as far as stability goes, they are all pretty stable
goldflame09 said:
i far as i know, there is a way to use camera but as for bluetooth, i thought i was working. the only completely fixed roms you will find are GB
also as far as stability goes, they are all pretty stable
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What custom rom do you use?
Nitrosolid said:
What custom rom do you use?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i have a 4.0 so my roms wouldnt be any good on your device.
as for how i know, ive been around here long enough to find out
Nitrosolid said:
It seems that the roms i have seen aren't fully functional.There's always something broken like the camera,Bluetooth etc.At least from the roms i see here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1720457
Could one of you guys give me a nice stable rom that has everything the stock has and more.I would like ICS but anything thats better than the stock is fine.Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The only bug on 4.2.2 Rom is the back camera not saving images. Recording still works and the front camera works, so unless you need the rear facing camera to take stills, a ROM based on 4.2.2 is your best option. Everything works just as well or better than stock, but if you want everything working, GB ROMs are the only option
Sent from my Nexus 7 using XDA Premium HD app
Supermaster34 said:
The only bug on 4.2.2 Rom is the back camera not saving images. Recording still works and the front camera works, so unless you need the rear facing camera to take stills, a ROM based on 4.2.2 is your best option. Everything works just as well or better than stock, but if you want everything working, GB ROMs are the only option
Sent from my Nexus 7 using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Jellybean? Hmm i wonder if it will slow down my device.I will look into them.Thanks
Nitrosolid said:
Jellybean? Hmm i wonder if it will slow down my device.I will look into them.Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it will not slow down your device at all
Nitrosolid said:
Jellybean? Hmm i wonder if it will slow down my device.I will look into them.Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it will make it much faster
Sent from my YP-G70 using xda app-developers app
Use stock rom!
Sent from my YP-G70 using xda app-developers app
Hey everyone.
Hope someone can help me.
Two questions basically:
1. Is there a way to get stock camera like quality with an AOSP rom? Last time I checked the picture and video quality was really really terrible in AOSP roms like CM, etc. Has this improved or is it possible to instal the Touchwiz camera on CM to get the stock picture and video quality?
2. What about battery life? I also remember it being much worse than stock. Any suggestions to make it better and more like Touchwiz rom? Maybe there's a good kernel that I should try to extend the battery life?
Thanks!
Sensamic said:
Hey everyone.
Hope someone can help me.
Two questions basically:
1. Is there a way to get stock camera like quality with an AOSP rom? Last time I checked the picture and video quality was really really terrible in AOSP roms like CM, etc. Has this improved or is it possible to instal the Touchwiz camera on CM to get the stock picture and video quality?
2. What about battery life? I also remember it being much worse than stock. Any suggestions to make it better and more like Touchwiz rom? Maybe there's a good kernel that I should try to extend the battery life?
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
(1) cameras are mostly fixed and quality is also quite ok. I still feel Samsung was better in the past (whereas long time on aosp here)
(2) in the beginning, you are correct, battery was terrible, or at least less than TW roms, now I get nearly the same time out of it. (using slimbean)
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Sensamic said:
Hey everyone.
Hope someone can help me.
Two questions basically:
1. Is there a way to get stock camera like quality with an AOSP rom? Last time I checked the picture and video quality was really really terrible in AOSP roms like CM, etc. Has this improved or is it possible to instal the Touchwiz camera on CM to get the stock picture and video quality?
2. What about battery life? I also remember it being much worse than stock. Any suggestions to make it better and more like Touchwiz rom? Maybe there's a good kernel that I should try to extend the battery life?
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. Yes, it is almost the same.
2. Now battery life is the same, if not better than stock TouchWiz
I've gone through some AOSP rom threads and I still see people complaining about the camera
Is there some camera app that I would need to install or only use the AOSP stock camera that comes with the AOSP roms?
tomosh22 said:
1. Yes, it is almost the same.
2. Now battery life is the same, if not better than stock TouchWiz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could you recommend which AOSP rom should I try that has these two requests?
Sensamic said:
I've gone through some AOSP rom threads and I still see people complaining about the camera
Is there some camera app that I would need to install or only use the AOSP stock camera that comes with the AOSP roms?
Could you recommend which AOSP rom should I try that has these two requests?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't seen any complaints and when i'm not running a nightly the camera is great.
Cyanogenmod, I'm using it and in my opinion its the best ROM available, ive never had a single crash on stable versions (nightlies crash on the camera) battery life is great, performance is better than a lot of ROMs but not quite as good as Liquid Smooth and camera quality is also great. Beware that on the current CM11 nightlys the camera makes the phone crash so use CM10.2 instead.
tomosh22 said:
I haven't seen any complaints and when i'm not running a nightly the camera is great.
Cyanogenmod, I'm using it and in my opinion its the best ROM available, ive never had a single crash on stable versions (nightlies crash on the camera) battery life is great, performance is better than a lot of ROMs but not quite as good as Liquid Smooth and camera quality is also great. Beware that on the current CM11 nightlys the camera makes the phone crash so use CM10.2 instead.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks!
How much screen on time you usually get with CM? Similar to stock samsung or more?
Sensamic said:
Thanks!
How much screen on time you usually get with CM? Similar to stock samsung or more?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Definitely more with same apps installed.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Give a thank if I helped you
JellyYogurt said:
Definitely more with same apps installed.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Give a thank if I helped you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which ROM are you using.
Iqbal Ansari said:
Which ROM are you using.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried cyanogenmod 10.2 last time for like 2-3 weeks. This is one of my battery stats
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Give a thank if I helped you
JellyYogurt said:
I tried cyanogenmod 10.2 last time for like 2-3 weeks. This is one of my battery stats
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Give a thank if I helped you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is screen on time.
Maybe you have not tried Stock ML2 yet. It is far better than 10.2 in terms of battery(according to your stats.)
I'm at 55% after 20 hours with 2 hours screen on time(heavy to moderate usage).
Iqbal Ansari said:
What is screen on time.
Maybe you have not tried Stock ML2 yet. It is far better than 10.2 in terms of battery(according to your stats.)
I'm at 55% after 20 hours with 2 hours screen on time(heavy to moderate usage).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What apps/games were u using?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Give a thank if I helped you
JellyYogurt said:
What apps/games were u using?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Give a thank if I helped you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wifi almost 60% of the time.
Heavy browsing around 40 min.
Whatsapp wechat intstagram twitter email (keep checking every hour) (no auto sync)
10 min calling.
Heavy camera usage took around 30+ pics.
maybe 15 min music.
No gaming at all.
I have 70+ apps installed.
Iqbal Ansari said:
Wifi almost 60% of the time.
Heavy browsing around 40 min.
Whatsapp wechat intstagram twitter email (keep checking every hour) (no auto sync)
10 min calling.
Heavy camera usage took around 30+ pics.
maybe 15 min music.
No gaming at all.
I have 70+ apps installed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How was tat even heavy... Try using 3G for youtube and xda
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Give a thank if I helped you
JellyYogurt said:
How was tat even heavy... Try using 3G for youtube and xda
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Give a thank if I helped you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you tried ML2 and still think that Aosp has better battery life.
Then which rom are you using, I would like to use it too.
Iqbal Ansari said:
Have you tried ML2 and still think that Aosp has better battery life.
Then which rom are you using, I would like to use it too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am using ML2 now too Have u used cyanogenmod 10.2? How long?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Give a thank if I helped you
JellyYogurt said:
I am using ML2 now too Have u used cyanogenmod 10.2? How long?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Give a thank if I helped you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Never used it at all thats why I was asking. I dont use custom roms cause of the battery and camera.
Thinking of using slimbean 4.3.1. Have you used it. Any review.
Iqbal Ansari said:
Never used it at all thats why I was asking. I dont use custom roms cause of the battery and camera.
Thinking of using slimbean 4.3.1. Have you used it. Any review.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nvr used slim bean. For aosp I only used cyanogenmod cos I am a fan of touchwiz and samsung camera
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Give a thank if I helped you