Hey guys vote for the Xperia P Stock ROM with Gingerbread Ice Cream Sandwich Jelly Bean!!!
State the reason you vote for each version.
Fine.
GB : I love the looks of it, but the UI isn't that smooth (Google starts polishing their UI from ICS)
ICS : Definitely more minimalist. And UI is extremely snappy and smooth. Apps run greatly on it and I love it.
JB : UI framerate is noticeably higher,but they actually bugs me sometimes. The UI is a bit messy for my taste, the launcher dock is very very ugly for my taste. And I love the icons on ICS much better,personally I like icons on the ICS firmware better. (Because I like cyan, blue,and purple)
I think we are talking about stock firmware here,but if I were to use stock firmware,I would stay on ICS.
If I really want to use JB,which I am currently using at the time of writing this, I would pick CM10,and customize the ui to my likings.
Now I'm using the XU,but I've used the ported stock JB,I'm not going to talk about the performance here,but the UI design is just a mess in my opinion.
Sent from my Xperia U running cm10 using xda premium
XDA_Bruno said:
Fine.
GB : I love the looks of it, but the UI isn't that smooth (Google starts polishing their UI from ICS)
ICS : Definitely more minimalist. And UI is extremely snappy and smooth. Apps run greatly on it and I love it.
JB : UI framerate is noticeably higher,but they actually bugs me sometimes. The UI is a bit messy for my taste, the launcher dock is very very ugly for my taste. And I love the icons on ICS much better,personally I like icons on the ICS firmware better. (Because I like cyan, blue,and purple)
I think we are talking about stock firmware here,but if I were to use stock firmware,I would stay on ICS.
If I really want to use JB,which I am currently using at the time of writing this, I would pick CM10,and customize the ui to my likings.
Now I'm using the XU,but I've used the ported stock JB,I'm not going to talk about the performance here,but the UI design is just a mess in my opinion.
Sent from my Xperia U running cm10 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For me
gingerbread:which is great performance then any other upgrade version(which is the most great version of SONY)
ice cream sandwich:great look and performance is not bad
jelly bean:nice looking and animation but got something lag there.
JB!
For me it's definitely JB, cause it's the smoothest one !
At xperia mini, GB & CM7 was waaaaaaaaaaaaaay better, but with xperia p i cant say that i prefer GB
CM9 is the best rom for me but lacks camera performance, especialy if you have the camera mod on ICS/JB
Maybe only for that i will change back to stock based rom
I'm still using GB because GB version is so fast , smooth , more RAM , perfect signal , and especially battery is very good .
As I realized,free ram not always means fast performance
At android I mean
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
aftergr said:
As I realized,free ram not always means fast performance
At android I mean
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have maked the test with some games on my XP ( detail test CPU , GPU and battery consumption between stock GB vs stock JB ) . Each game i play about 30 minutes .
Asphalt 6:
GB : very good ( 30minutes consume 24% battery ) - JB : good (29%)
Asphalt 7:
GB : very good (32%)- JB : a bit lag (38%)
Deer hunter reload:
GB : very good (22%) - JB : good but slow (26%)
Spider man :
GB : very good (30%) - JB : very good (31%)
Nova 3:
GB : good (38%) - JB : some lags (43%)
....................
And i noticed if receive message while playing game . JB have more lags but no matter with GB .
CPU/GPU on GB is perfect because GB have more RAM than JB and bravia engine on GB work perfectly .
After one week make the test , i turn back to GB .
belity said:
I have maked the test with some games on my XP ( detail test CPU , GPU and battery consumption between stock GB vs stock JB ) . Each game i play about 30 minutes .
Asphalt 6:
GB : very good ( 30minutes consume 24% battery ) - JB : good (29%)
Asphalt 7:
GB : very good (32%)- JB : a bit lag (38%)
Deer hunter reload:
GB : very good (22%) - JB : good but slow (26%)
Spider man :
GB : very good (30%) - JB : very good (31%)
Nova 3:
GB : good (38%) - JB : some lags (43%)
....................
And i noticed if receive message while playing game . JB have more lags but no matter with GB .
CPU/GPU on GB is perfect because GB have more RAM than JB and bravia engine on GB work perfectly .
After one week make the test , i turn back to GB .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats cause you confront stock jb
With CM9 for example i have 200mb less free than GB but the game performance is a little bit better
Stock based roms for example are much better than stock JB
Stock jb is not good at all at XP
ICS rocking like hell
VIVA ics
ICS
ICS <3
Ics with jb apps
Related
I have switched from samsung LP7 rom to AOSP (F1 GNex) and then AOKP (hydrogen).
and I really love the overall UI smoothness on both, however I did notice that 3D graphics performance is not as good as in the samsung ics rom.
This is very noticeable (low frame rate lag) in games like Modern Combat 3 and ShadowGun..
Anybody knows the reason why?
Note: I did not underclock/undervolt the cpu or gpu
same issue here on all AOSP and AOKP roms i think there is real problem in GPU driver in Aosp OR screen refresh rate and until now not fixed i really hate the fps drops in games i feel like i have a **** device not sgs2
btw if u run antutu when it come in 3d graphic test(knight) in start of test the fps get stuck at 51 fps like 10-15 second then it goes up and in nena mark 2 when u look in the fps meter u can see the fps gose up an down like hell in all aosp roms and the test lag as hell the u will got 46 on sammy rom the test run so so smooth and the fps much better no fps drops and u will got between 52-54 fps
this issue is keeping me on sammy rom but i really like the Aosp and Aokp i really hope it will fix soon
Agreed.
yahyoh said:
in nena mark 2 when u look in the fps meter u can see the fps gose up an down like hell in all aosp roms and the test lag as hell the u will got 46 on sammy rom the test run so so smooth and the fps much better no fps drops and u will got between 52-54 fps
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can confirm this.
Can it be fixed im cm9?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA
iamnotkurtcobain said:
Can it be fixed im cm9?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
idk there is many things to fix in Aosp roms and most impotent thing is the laggy 3d thing that issue keep away from cm or aokp roms but i really like them
u can ask codeworkx for fix but he will ignore u and i think he is busy with i9100G too as i read in cm thread
btw there is problem with ram too
in sammy rom i got more than 1070 points in aosp only 890 in quadrant i got more than 3200 in ram points in aosp 2000
so for now sammy rom is best in every thing performance-stability-for games - etc
in GB the Aosp roms was slightly better in every thing than sammy rom but idk what happened in ics it become the opposite or maybe sammy but some magic in there ics roms
darkchazz said:
I have switched from samsung LP7 rom to AOSP (F1 GNex) and then AOKP (hydrogen).
and I really love the overall UI smoothness on both, however I did notice that 3D graphics performance is not as good as in the samsung ics rom.
This is very noticeable (low frame rate lag) in games like Modern Combat 3 and ShadowGun..
Anybody knows the reason why?
Note: I did not underclock/undervolt the cpu or gpu
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree
yahyoh said:
idk there is many things to fix in Aosp roms and most impotent thing is the laggy 3d thing that issue keep away from cm or aokp roms but i really like them
u can ask codeworkx for fix but he will ignore u and i think he is busy with i9100G too as i read in cm thread
btw there is problem with ram too
in sammy rom i got more than 1070 points in aosp only 890 in quadrant i got more than 3200 in ram points in aosp 2000
so for now sammy rom is best in every thing performance-stability-for games - etc
in GB the Aosp roms was slightly better in every thing than sammy rom but idk what happened in ics it become the opposite or maybe sammy but some magic in there ics roms
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree
Enviado do meu GalaxyS2 usando Tapatalk 2.1
maybe you can get driver sources from samsung so codeworkx can work on them
other wise you have to live with it
sadly samsung doesnt provide sources besides kernel
in fact no manufacturer does
which is the biggest drawback in aosp rom or phones like s2
but the advantages out weight the problems aosp ftw
what the hell the thread moved to Q&A thanks for mod now no one will see it
So it's a driver problem I assume ?
AOKP & CM9 roms are slow compare to AOSP & Sam roms. I usualy get 59.8 fps on antutu benchmark at knights where as on AOKP & CM9 roms it doesn't go beyond 54-56 fps. IMO try 4.0.3 roms instead of 4.0.4 ! You will feel the difference.
And one more thing try Siyah 3.0.0rc1 - 3.0.1. (Device gets quite hot but it gives you nice fps on HD games like MC3,Shadowgun, Asphalt 6).
I know AOKP & CM9 have lots of nice tweaks but they are not yet optimized & have some touch problems likr when you swipe left it goes right etc )
:| Bye
Chairmansaab said:
AOKP & CM9 roms are slow compare to AOSP & Sam roms. I usualy get 59.8 fps on antutu benchmark at knights where as on AOKP & CM9 roms it doesn't go beyond 54-56 fps. IMO try 4.0.3 roms instead of 4.0.4 ! You will feel the difference.
And one more thing try Siyah 3.0.0rc1 - 3.0.1. (Device gets quite hot but it gives you nice fps on HD games like MC3,Shadowgun, Asphalt 6).
I know AOKP & CM9 have lots of nice tweaks but they are not yet optimized & have some touch problems likr when you swipe left it goes right etc )
:| Bye
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what u mean by AOSP
as i know AOSP is cm9 or F1 rom
Hello guys, I wonder if there is any custom rom for Xperia Neo V, which run the games without any lag, or at least with minimum of lags.
sorry for bad english!
vioxxter said:
Hello guys, I wonder if there is any custom rom for Xperia Neo V, which run the games without any lag, or at least with minimum of lags.
sorry for bad english!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't really tested much but as far as I know it goes like GB(Codename 9, X-GAMER) > JB(CM10, AOKP) > ICS
Imo ICS is the least optimised for gaming, but bear in mind that I haven't really done any real benchmarks so I might be wrong on this, someone should back me up first
of course GB i better for gaming but i dont have mush problem with ICS:good:
GB are the best for gaming man
u can try codename he's fast n
Stable
Of course GB because is lighter than ICS
For all the fools answers (not eveyone)
He asked ICS AND JELLY BEAN! NO GINGERBREAD.
I really dont know which one is fastest but bear in mind that JB needs more ram, and has many bugs.
it depends...
well of course it depends on what kind of games are you playing...as guys/girls said JB uses more ram and its still under development, but if you have nice tuned ics its definetely better...i sugest you to take a day off for your phone and just try roms...it cant hurt and you will find the rom that suits you best
gb, ics generates as many compatibility problems or close by themselves.
apart gives you more free RAM
there are many ICS custom roms that good for games
vioxxter said:
Hello guys, I wonder if there is any custom rom for Xperia Neo V, which run the games without any lag, or at least with minimum of lags.
sorry for bad english!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM9 , i.e. ICS and Jelly sandwich are pretty good RAMwise, and therefore good for playing games.
Moreover if you want a lag free gaming, close all background running apps before running games, as 512 MB is never enough RAM for gaming.
check it out
drmann89 said:
CM9 , i.e. ICS and Jelly sandwich are pretty good RAMwise, and therefore good for playing games.
Moreover if you want a lag free gaming, close all background running apps before running games, as 512 MB is never enough RAM for gaming.
check it out
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ohh..dear....i tested in JB and ICS both....ofcourse JB has good benchmarks..
but gaming experince is same in both......remember GB is best for gaming...otherwise u can buy PS3 or XBOX
How is GB lighter than JB? Why is that?
I know that JB have some tweaks like better multitasking and that may consume ram, but shouldn't JB be as lighter as GB if you just disable everything it has working in background? I'm asking this because recetly i changed from JB to GB for better gaming experience and it's really faster in GB. Then i was wondering why can't i make JB as fast as GB even if just for about some minutes, for the gaming experience...
ffp. said:
How is GB lighter than JB? Why is that?
I know that JB have some tweaks like better multitasking and that may consume ram, but shouldn't JB be as lighter as GB if you just disable everything it has working in background? I'm asking this because recetly i changed from JB to GB for better gaming experience and it's really faster in GB. Then i was wondering why can't i make JB as fast as GB even if just for about some minutes, for the gaming experience...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GB for gaming and JB for beautiful interface
Saingpor said:
GB for gaming and JB for beautiful interface
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know that and you didn't answered none of my questions :laugh:. I would like to see a better explanation.
Greetings my dear friends.
I'm here to give my verdict on the upgrade to ICS after 2 months using the ICS Stock ROM I could finish something. Read and understand.
I have an XPERIA U ST25a retail brazilian.
Sure, the stock ICS ROM is very attractive, all good new stuff found in Android 4.0 are very good, like the new UI or settings menu, the toggles easily accessible are very useful, but the apparent instability and slowness (in moments) make me think why I bought this phone, and also think about going back to the old but great stock GB ROM.
And yes, i use ICS ROM, I made my own modifications and tweaks to the all-bloated ICS Stock ROM get the maximum performance.
But the bugs are really ridiculous.
The battery only charges sometimes if the phone is restarted, otherwise the indicator will be locked at 39%, for example.
The camera seems to be slow compared to the old Stock GingerBread ROM.
The open / close applications is not slow, but sometimes the application takes to respond as if something sucking the system performance.
All these bugs may (or may not) be Sony's problem, but since the era of my old devices I have these SAME problems in some ICS ROMs (I've also tested the FXP CM9 rom, and believe me, if you fill up with apps, will be slow too).
It seems that Android 4.0 ICS is always buggy and slow, and then Eclair 2.1 (horrible) then followed by the 2.2 Froyo (good).
My conclusion: Don't upgrade if you hate a phone will be a little bit slower.
I just do not go back to stock GB ROM why I still enjoy a good user interface instead of performance.
But if you do not like one bit of minimal slowdowns or some bugs, DO NOT bother upgrading to ICS. Just a beautiful day, we have the long awaited Jelly Bean. Even if it is a CM10, the "Butter Project" realizes disappear with lags. And all these little problems may be fixed.
I just let my experience here on this upgrade does not seem that there be a good idea.
Thank you very much
What ics firmware build number are you talking about?
Sent from my Jellybean Xperia S
About any ICS firmware. I've tested B.1.10, B.1.54 and C.1.10 and of these three have similar and different problems. Its a problem about android 4.0 that have been build focused on research data...
Ics is a very ram hungry ...if u have a device which has ram 512 or below that, them trust me it's best to stay at GB.. In my Xperia P ICS eats up 500MB of my ram.i am just left with 430 MB of usable memory...
Sent from my LT22i using Tapatalk 2
techno-np said:
Ics is a very ram hungry ...if u have a device which has ram 512 or below that, them trust me it's best to stay at GB.. In my Xperia P ICS eats up 500MB of my ram.i am just left with 430 MB of usable memory...
Sent from my LT22i using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But in android free ram doesn't mean more performance, lag will only appear when RAM reaches the "lag level" (30~25 free ram)
Here on my XPU i have 120~140MB free and i don't have any lag. BTW if you install a bunch of crappy apps and let the bloatware of Sony installed you will certainly will get some lag. Even on a XPP with 1GB of RAM you can feel some lags, i've already tested yet!
Yes if you say it like that.. Then yes under a microscope ICS does lag a bit.it's inevitable even the quad cores lag in ics from time to time.. But hey that's why there is JB for the rescue...
Sent from my LT22i using Tapatalk 2
Moved to Q&A
Salo-S said:
Greetings my dear friends.
I'm here to give my verdict on the upgrade to ICS after 2 months using the ICS Stock ROM I could finish something. Read and understand.
I have an XPERIA U ST25a retail brazilian.
Sure, the stock ICS ROM is very attractive, all good new stuff found in Android 4.0 are very good, like the new UI or settings menu, the toggles easily accessible are very useful, but the apparent instability and slowness (in moments) make me think why I bought this phone, and also think about going back to the old but great stock GB ROM.
And yes, i use ICS ROM, I made my own modifications and tweaks to the all-bloated ICS Stock ROM get the maximum performance.
But the bugs are really ridiculous.
The battery only charges sometimes if the phone is restarted, otherwise the indicator will be locked at 39%, for example.
The camera seems to be slow compared to the old Stock GingerBread ROM.
The open / close applications is not slow, but sometimes the application takes to respond as if something sucking the system performance.
All these bugs may (or may not) be Sony's problem, but since the era of my old devices I have these SAME problems in some ICS ROMs (I've also tested the FXP CM9 rom, and believe me, if you fill up with apps, will be slow too).
It seems that Android 4.0 ICS is always buggy and slow, and then Eclair 2.1 (horrible) then followed by the 2.2 Froyo (good).
My conclusion: Don't upgrade if you hate a phone will be a little bit slower.
I just do not go back to stock GB ROM why I still enjoy a good user interface instead of performance.
But if you do not like one bit of minimal slowdowns or some bugs, DO NOT bother upgrading to ICS. Just a beautiful day, we have the long awaited Jelly Bean. Even if it is a CM10, the "Butter Project" realizes disappear with lags. And all these little problems may be fixed.
I just let my experience here on this upgrade does not seem that there be a good idea.
Thank you very much
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock ROM: go for GingerBread otherwise CM.
Rgds.
Salo-S said:
But in android free ram doesn't mean more performance, lag will only appear when RAM reaches the "lag level" (30~25 free ram)
Here on my XPU i have 120~140MB free and i don't have any lag. BTW if you install a bunch of crappy apps and let the bloatware of Sony installed you will certainly will get some lag. Even on a XPP with 1GB of RAM you can feel some lags, i've already tested yet!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think lag by alot of app is open. So I endtast and free ram. It Work fine with me.
I prefer the GB which is less power hungry on RAM compared to ICS.
ICS, I find it laggy.
Most games lag on ICS compared to GB.
For me, if I'll choose, I'll go for Custom ROM based on ICS(not the stock one that sony distributed). If you don't like stock ROM then I'll stick to GB because ICS consumes more RAM than GB.
Hey guys,
This may seem to be a little cliched, but I wanted to flash a really responsive ROM.
I have sony xperia neo V bought about a year and a half back.
I have Cynogenmod 9 flashed
I really think ROMs are subjective, hence I wanted to have my wants ready:-
1. It must be responsive, dialer must be fast. Touchscreen shouldn't lag. ( cynogen9 after some days is unfortunatly sluggish ;( )
2. I dont care about looks. It can be as ugly as possible. I want functionality.
3. HD gaming and all are not needed. I need to play basic games.
4. FM Radio must work. I really miss it in cynogenmod9
5. WiFi, bluetooth, 2g/3g, camera: all must work. I dont want them to get enhanced. Just work.
6. Speed.
7. Froyo, ICS, JB. I dont care. I want a responsive, fast phone.
Can you guys please help me out with that. I tried to find a few ROMs, but none describes if FM works. Almost everyone says its fastest out there. I think you guys can help out according to my needs.
PS: The Stock rom sucked. And after ICS update it sucked and bit both.
moronictides said:
Hey guys,
This may seem to be a little cliched, but I wanted to flash a really responsive ROM.
I have sony xperia neo V bought about a year and a half back.
I have Cynogenmod 9 flashed
I really think ROMs are subjective, hence I wanted to have my wants ready:-
1. It must be responsive, dialer must be fast. Touchscreen shouldn't lag. ( cynogen9 after some days is unfortunatly sluggish ;( )
2. I dont care about looks. It can be as ugly as possible. I want functionality.
3. HD gaming and all are not needed. I need to play basic games.
4. FM Radio must work. I really miss it in cynogenmod9
5. WiFi, bluetooth, 2g/3g, camera: all must work. I dont want them to get enhanced. Just work.
6. Speed.
7. Froyo, ICS, JB. I dont care. I want a responsive, fast phone.
Can you guys please help me out with that. I tried to find a few ROMs, but none describes if FM works. Almost everyone says its fastest out there. I think you guys can help out according to my needs.
PS: The Stock rom sucked. And after ICS update it sucked and bit both.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Codename by emanxperia is really stable and really fast and it is GB
Sent from Xperia neo L
moronictides said:
Hey guys,
This may seem to be a little cliched, but I wanted to flash a really responsive ROM.
I have sony xperia neo V bought about a year and a half back.
I have Cynogenmod 9 flashed
I really think ROMs are subjective, hence I wanted to have my wants ready:-
1. It must be responsive, dialer must be fast. Touchscreen shouldn't lag. ( cynogen9 after some days is unfortunatly sluggish ;( )
2. I dont care about looks. It can be as ugly as possible. I want functionality.
3. HD gaming and all are not needed. I need to play basic games.
4. FM Radio must work. I really miss it in cynogenmod9
5. WiFi, bluetooth, 2g/3g, camera: all must work. I dont want them to get enhanced. Just work.
6. Speed.
7. Froyo, ICS, JB. I dont care. I want a responsive, fast phone.
Can you guys please help me out with that. I tried to find a few ROMs, but none describes if FM works. Almost everyone says its fastest out there. I think you guys can help out according to my needs.
PS: The Stock rom sucked. And after ICS update it sucked and bit both.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i would strongly recommend you to try the AtoMic GB 7! its very fast stable with zero bugs and ics look! everything works like a charm! also it has a great battery life and awesome gaming experiance!!! if i could use one word then that would be BEST i believe i gave you an idea! try it and im sure you wont be disappointed!
moronictides said:
I want a responsive, fast phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i tried alot of roms out there for neo v and if you really want a responsive, fast phone,...buy a new phone...
all roms get laggy after some time of usage.
codename x has only a few bugs, is quite responsive (but after a week you have to reboot because of heavy lags) and stable.
someone also said, that cm7 has great performance on neo v, but i haven't tried it so far.
JJ's Hybrid ROM, Ultimate HD, Jelly Sandwich, Ice Cream Purness are all great roms with only a few bugs, stable and if you reboot your phone every 1-2 days they are all quite fast.
I preffer JJ's as it has pure AOSP feeling and i cant remember that it has any bugs but Ultimate HD might be a little faster than the other ICS roms.
There are tons of other ics roms, but they are all very similar in performance.
The fastest rom imo is polished blood but it is not really stable with alot of bugs (no hdmi, no fm iirc, camera not fully working...) (well didnt used it for quite a while, maybe it is better now)
i am about to try out pure xperia hd. the creator claims ice cream purness with better performance. that would be great as icp from thillinac is one of the best ics roms for sure and if it would have a little better (hopefully long term) performance, it could be the perfect rom.
ICS ROMs are very laggy...
GB: X-GAMER, Codename
JB: AOSP by mike or AOKP
mastero9017 said:
ICS ROMs are very laggy...
GB: X-GAMER, Codename
JB: AOSP by mike or AOKP
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Also include in jb super jelly bean 3.0 by harsh use it with fusion v5.1 it will meet all your requirements
Sent from my Xperia Neo V using xda premium
---------- Post added at 12:40 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:36 AM ----------
avinashrocks1990 said:
Also include in jb super jelly bean 3.0 by harsh use it with fusion v5.1 it will meet all your requirements
Sent from my Xperia Neo V using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And if you remove one of your requirements I.e gaming you can install supercharger script you won't face any lag ever even if you don't restart your phone
Although you won't need it on fusion kernel coz it's awesome
Sent from my Xperia Neo V using xda premium
Try moAOKP with Fusion 5.0 or 5.1
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=39936498
fka said:
i tried alot of roms out there for neo v and if you really want a responsive, fast phone,...buy a new phone...
all roms get laggy after some time of usage.
codename x has only a few bugs, is quite responsive (but after a week you have to reboot because of heavy lags) and stable.
someone also said, that cm7 has great performance on neo v, but i haven't tried it so far.
JJ's Hybrid ROM, Ultimate HD, Jelly Sandwich, Ice Cream Purness are all great roms with only a few bugs, stable and if you reboot your phone every 1-2 days they are all quite fast.
I preffer JJ's as it has pure AOSP feeling and i cant remember that it has any bugs but Ultimate HD might be a little faster than the other ICS roms.
There are tons of other ics roms, but they are all very similar in performance.
The fastest rom imo is polished blood but it is not really stable with alot of bugs (no hdmi, no fm iirc, camera not fully working...) (well didnt used it for quite a while, maybe it is better now)
i am about to try out pure xperia hd. the creator claims ice cream purness with better performance. that would be great as icp from thillinac is one of the best ics roms for sure and if it would have a little better (hopefully long term) performance, it could be the perfect rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why do u know that these rom need to reboot 1-2 days? I don't see any notice in their thread!
g.man.7489 said:
Why do u know that these rom need to reboot 1-2 days? I don't see any notice in their thread!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's recommend to restart your phone in 1-2 days
As apps start locking memory space (ram)
And eventually your phone becomes laggy
Sent from my Xperia Neo V using Tapatalk 2
Again a thread with "fastest rom"
Please try by yourself and feel the things by yourself
The fastest rom is:.... An old nokia 3310:silly:
:::[ Pandemic Quote.:: Im The Godfather Of St Octane TF Packs !!
Press Thanks If You Like My Work/Advice !!!