Hi. I would like to ask Why there isn't stable CM 10.1 for i9100 when i9100g already has it!
when I go to stable CM for i9100 the page is empty, why?
http://download.cyanogenmod.org/?type=stable&device=i9100
Although we dont have a prper stable release i think it works fine. You should try it
Enviado desde mi GT-I9100 usando Tapatalk 2
Simple.....exynos source codes....and Samsungs refusal to release them.....CM roms will NEVER be classed as 'stable' without this code.
But that isn't to say that they are particularly UNstable.....yes, there may be a few minor bugs, but for day to day use they're fine......
And imo, the CyanogenMod team has done a brilliant job in spite of the lack of cooperation from Samsung. .....
Sent from my rooted, de bloated, stock JB powered S2 via PhilZ kernel and XDA developers app
yes, most CM developers abandoned all exynos device development.
Sent from the little guy
Thanks for your response. I'm using nightly build of CM10.1, and it works great except some problems here and there.
You can find info on any build in the CM thread.
Sent from...this is not even my S2
Related
Hi!
Where can i find "old" cm10 nightly builds for s2?
In get.cm site there are only cm10.1 builds
Thanks
_Reve_ said:
Hi!
Where i can find "old" cm10 nightly builds for s2?
In get.cm site there are only cm10.1 builds
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's wrong with the 10.1 builds? They are nearly perfect anyway, and as far as I know, the exynos4 hack is still present in cm10, whereas the 10.1 builds are secure. I believe you still can get the builds on the get.cm website if you look hard enough.
Sent from my GT-I9100
i tested 10.1 for a while and in my opinion is slower than cm10 version (maybe because i upgrade from cm10 without wipe?).
furthermore in 10.1 there are many things that are useless IMHO (tile,user-switch,daydream).
i searched on get.cm but i really don't find anything about cm10 for s2.
SocketReve said:
i tested 10.1 for a while and in my opinion is slower than cm10 version (maybe because i upgrade from cm10 without wipe?).
furthermore in 10.1 there are many things that are useless IMHO (tile,user-switch,daydream).
i searched on get.cm but i really don't find anything about cm10 for s2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes you should wipe everything and do a clean install bcz cm10.1 is a different android version. BTW nobody uses cm10 now bcz 10.1 is better
Thanks my friend
Hi guys,
FIRST, this is NOT(!!) a thread for asking which is the best ROM.
i'm coming from Galaxy S2, and i'm using Omega and crDroid for a while...
on the S2 i had AOKP or AOSP but here, i cant find any stable version.
on the S2 there were JellyBam, RootBox etc.
any one can point for a STABLE DAILY USE rom aosp or aokp?
all i see is compiled nightlies and i dont know if that is stable enough...
thanks for the help.
Shahar.
You've clearly not searched enough.
Jellybam and Rootbox are available for the S3.
Search in the dev forums
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
mikep99 said:
You've clearly not searched enough.
Jellybam and Rootbox are available for the S3.
Search in the dev forums
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually i did.. but do you the word nightlies in my post? Looking for a non jellybam stable release...
Had som issue with that one...
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
shahar2k9 said:
FIRST, this is NOT(!!) a thread for asking which is the best ROM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kinda is...
shahar2k9 said:
Hi guys,
FIRST, this is NOT(!!) a thread for asking which is the best ROM.
i'm coming from Galaxy S2, and i'm using Omega and crDroid for a while...
on the S2 i had AOKP or AOSP but here, i cant find any stable version.
on the S2 there were JellyBam, RootBox etc.
any one can point for a STABLE DAILY USE rom aosp or aokp?
all i see is compiled nightlies and i dont know if that is stable enough...
thanks for the help.
Shahar.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
None of the Jellybean based cm based ROMs are stable. So at the moment you will not find what you are looking for. They all have clearly listed bugs.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
"Hi guys,
FIRST, this is NOT(!!) a thread for asking which is the best ROM.
i'm coming from Galaxy S2, and i'm using Omega and crDroid for a while...
on the S2 i had AOKP or AOSP but here, i cant find any stable version.
on the S2 there were JellyBam, RootBox etc.
any one can point for a STABLE DAILY USE rom aosp or aokp?
all i see is compiled nightlies and i dont know if that is stable enough...
thanks for the help.
Shahar."
@shahar2k9
Why don't you try supernexus 2.0. It's based on jelly bean 4.2.1 and it is nice and stable. I am using it as a daily driver along with a lot of other people. I would definitely check it out if I were you.
shahar2k9 said:
Hi guys,
FIRST, this is NOT(!!) a thread for asking which is the best ROM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That might not be what you intended but as you can see from the post 1 above this one, that's what this thread is becoming.
Nightlies are actually more stable than most people give them credit for... just look around in the dev forum, find a ROM you like the look of, flash it. If you are satisfied, great, if not then move onto a different ROM.
Thread closed.
I am using Samsung Galaxy Ace 2.
I was doing a research about CyanogenMod, and I read that allmost everywhere there are some things that doesnt work. For example camera,bluetooth etc.
I just rooted my phone Just for that mod.... and if I cant get my cam or BT to work I dont find it useful. Is there any chance of getting fully working cyanogenmod ?
Thanks
Well that is all up to the hard working devs of your phone
It might take sometime to fix it or it might never be fixed. It depends on if the rom is official cyanogenmod or a unofficial rom and how much effort devs are willing to put in.
Sent from my HTC Velocity 4G using Tapatalk 4 beta
WildfireDEV said:
Well that is all up to the hard working devs of your phone
It might take sometime to fix it or it might never be fixed. It depends on if the rom is official cyanogenmod or a unofficial rom and how much effort devs are willing to put in.
Sent from my HTC Velocity 4G using Tapatalk 4 beta
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2rCwCSEq8Q&list=LL_udn4T-kC_V7hISFvRRy3w&feature=mh_lolz
Could you tell me if this is the official rom? I cant really understand. I would like to get official one if possible.
if its not from http://get.cm/ then its not official cm rom from cm dev/maintainer.
an0nym0us_ said:
if its not from http://get.cm/ then its not official cm rom from cm dev/maintainer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cant find one for my phone there. Searching is weird..
From the official page. If its ment for Ace. will it work for ace 2 as well ?
And do any of u guys use CM too ? And is it official or not ?
Guess there isnt a CM for ace 2. what a shame :/
rihardszz said:
Cant find one for my phone there. Searching is weird..
From the official page. If its ment for Ace. will it work for ace 2 as well ?
And do any of u guys use CM too ? And is it official or not ?
Guess there isnt a CM for ace 2. what a shame :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well seeing as the ace us a different device from the ace 2 you really can't flash roms made for a different phone unless you know how to port it to your phone.
Sent from my HTC Velocity 4G using Tapatalk 4 beta
---------- Post added at 08:14 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:12 AM ----------
You could look at this rom
http://forum.cyanogenmod.com/topic/73631-cm10-sakura-droid-project-samsung-galaxy-ace-2/
Sent from my HTC Velocity 4G using Tapatalk 4 beta
Ace 2 doesn't have Official CM Support.
These bugs in unofficial builds are due to lack of sources from companies that are reluctant to open source their drivers.
Hey guys!
As you maybe know, we have the newest Android 4.4 but only a 3.0 Kernel. But we need the newer versions since Android is based of this new ones and if the gap between our version and Google's version is too big, it will take a long time to reach this. So i would say: "We need a newer kernel, let's go for it!" and i wanted to know if anybody is willing or if somebody is even able to port the 3.4 (or a newer version like 3.10 or 3.12) to our device to get better performance and to be safe to get all updates. If anybody is able and wants to help, please write it here or PM me. Also we should form a dev team to have the control over this project.
So if anybody is willing to, I will really appreciate it. I start this project on my own and you can join in to help and contribute your knowledge to this project. I will provide more info if needed. And yes, I know that it will be difficult but it is possible to reach the target.
Greets and best regards,
markey
If you want, have a look over here:Thread in development discussion section
Edit1: As i've seen in the poll, everybody (till now) wants the 3.4 kernel to be ported. So I have another question: Do you want me to port the 3.10 (or higher) Kernel also, after the 3.4 is running stable?
If yes, just write at the end of your post. Thanks. :good:
Edit2: I have decided to start porting the 3.1x+ Kernel based on dorimanx' sources first and then will try to port 3.4 cause 3.4 will have a better ability to be well integrated into Android till now and 3.10+ will take us one step further and keep us on track for the next Android versions which will be propably based on 3.8 or 3.10 Kernel.
If you have questions what this upgrade will (roughly) bring us, have a look at my last post in this thread.
This is great. It will be HARD, but, worth it. Just, maybe, this will see completion one day. I'll copy in kernel devs if I were you.
@DerTeufel1980
Sent from my Omni 4.4 Galaxy S3. Proud Googy Beta tester.
Great to see this! We need 3.4.x kernel!!
Regards :good:
Yes we can
tapatalked with my i9300
ROM: CyanogenMod 11
Kernel: Googy-Max2 (r3p2)
Googy to the rescue?!
Sent from my Omni 4.4 Galaxy S3. Proud Googy Beta tester.
It will be great!!!! Good luck, man:good:
Yes. Its gsear. Wait!!!
Sent from my GT-I9300 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Let the fun begin
Envoyé de mon GT-I9300 en utilisant Tapatalk
This a is a great quest ... my props to the dev !
About kernel
3.4 would be amazing
3.10/12 more than we ever could ask
Thanks for u guys doing what samsung never cared to do for us
Enviado do meu GT-I9300 através de Tapatalk
googy_anas said:
Let the fun begin
Envoyé de mon GT-I9300 en utilisant Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We have lift off!
Sent from my Nexus 7 (2014) using Tapatalk. My mobile is an Omni run Galaxy S3.
Stunning idea! I just wish I already had the knowledge and the time to help, but I really hope this takes off!
edit. go for 3.10-3.12 of course, the Sky's the limit, but 3.4 is a good stopgap as it runs on similar Samsung-devices ...
Someone could try merging dorimanx smdk4210 (s2) Kernel. He has already merged most of 3.13, and our s3 kernel is also working for s2, after cm had merged some parts.
Gesendet von meinem SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 mit Tapatalk 2
DerTeufel1980 said:
Someone could try merging dorimanx smdk4210 (s2) Kernel. He has already merged most of 3.13, and our s3 kernel is also working for s2, after cm had merged some parts.
Gesendet von meinem SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 mit Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for that great info DerTeufel, I will see when I can start to merge it and work on it. So it would mean, we could directly start at 3.13. Isn't that great? I will search for his git, and then i will compare our actual kernels with a 3.0 s2 kernel and see what i have to change. Most difficult part will be to get it booting...rest shouldn't be a thing that big. Let's wait and see.
markey97 said:
Thank you for that great info DerTeufel, I will see when I can start to merge it and work on it. So it would mean, we could directly start at 3.13. Isn't that great? I will search for his git, and then i will compare our actual kernels with a 3.0 s2 kernel and see what i have to change. Most difficult part will be to get it booting...rest shouldn't be a thing that big. Let's wait and see.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great idea! Hope it goes well.
Sent from my Nexus 7 (2014) using Tapatalk. My mobile is an Omni run Galaxy S3.
Maybe stupid question, this kernel will be used only on AOSP Roms?, or may run on sammy roms?
niikko said:
Maybe stupid question, this kernel will be used only on AOSP Roms?, or may run on sammy roms?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No its no stupid question, just ask if you want to know anything. You're welcome and i am here to answer questions :good:
And now to your question: For now, its meant to run on AOSP ROMs and then afterwards, I will take a deeper look and see if I can get it running good on Sammy, so just wait a bit
And I think I will add features of googy-max kernel, devil-kernel, boeffla-kernel...whatever you want, just write it then when its running fine, and i will try to add it.
I also already thought about adding dual-boot, so yes, you will most likely see Sammy support in this kernel. And afterwards, I will try to make it a kexec kernel and get multiROM or sth like this running, to have e.g. Android and Ubuntu Touch on 1 single device
dat shi cray
samisax said:
dat shi cray
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What do you want to say with that?
Does this have any sense?
Very nice initiative. Devs in SGS Plus (i9001) also made a fully working 3.4 kernel from the scratch (CAF sources at least ) and now they can release KitKat without pains
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk
sanefirst said:
Very nice initiative. Devs in SGS Plus (i9001) also made a fully working 3.4 kernel from the scratch (CAF sources at least ) and now they can release KitKat without pains
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha I know, I own this device myself and followed all developement of the 3.4 Kernel and all other work done by ADC team. :good: They used CAF sources but we will use sources from dorimanx cause we have an exynos processor.
Erik is a good dev, isn't he? Thanks to him we also got dual boot and I think we can also get further versions of Android thanks to ADC team.
Well, we will see how good I can get this working in a short time.
Tbh, i know just jack about ROMs and aokp or aosp builds.
Im much confused between what are and the differences b/w AOSP and AOKP builds. and what is Omega (is it a ROM? or is the base for AOKP. i mean i just dont understand all this confusion .. u get the idea how much i know )
if CM is a ROM and AOSP is its base, then is CM also on AOKP ? if im wrong in what i understand pls correct and teach me from zero.
i know about rooting phone just confused between all the technical terms and ROMs and builds and whats Omega, and hows it diff from CM etc. etc.
Pls im desperate and eager. Anybodies time is greatly appreciated
Thanks!
just btw, using galaxy s3 (intl.) rooted and cm11 nightly flashed.
All ROMs are based on AOSP. Since that's the thing people call Android. There are then ROMs that are based on any of the 3 biggest ROMs out there. So you might see a ROM that's based on CM which in turn is based on AOSP.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk
SMillerNL said:
All ROMs are based on AOSP. Since that's the thing people call Android. There are then ROMs that are based on any of the 3 biggest ROMs out there. So you might see a ROM that's based on CM which in turn is based on AOSP.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
alright i get your point.. but then is CM also on AOKP now? and what is Omega? and what could be better Omega or CM ?
akijazz05 said:
alright i get your point.. but then is CM also on AOKP now? and what is Omega? and what could be better Omega or CM ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, CM is not on AOKP. They are two completely different derivatives of AOSP. I have no idea what omega is. You'll just have to do some research for yourself.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk