Hello, I wanted to ask you, who are a community of experts, to take off a question.
Why us with the galaxy s3 int we are still stuck at version 3.0.xx kernel? and for example users with galaxy s plus they have kernel versions 3.4
There are some incompatibilities?
is a problem of the processors Exynos?
Thanks for your attention
because you shouldn't compare versions in different devices.
PS read the sticky threads before posting. Qs go into Q&A
Because Samsung. Exynos or not, they keep certain kernel versions a long time.
On the other hand, if it works and works well, why upgrade?
Glebun said:
because you shouldn't compare versions in different devices.
PS read the sticky threads before posting. Qs go into Q&A
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry for the error (if there is any mod that can move the discussion in Q & A :good
Anyway I did this comparison because it was the first terminal that came to my mind,
why do you say that I should not compare your different terminals?
Theshawty said:
Because Samsung. Exynos or not, they keep certain kernel versions a long time.
On the other hand, if it works and works well, why upgrade?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, no, it works well for what it is just my question on this fact because you can get to a kernel upgrade (perhaps in the end it does not change anything)
Volpe92 said:
No, no, it works well for what it is just my question on this fact because you can get to a kernel upgrade (perhaps in the end it does not change anything)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Custom kernels usually have a higher linux version.
Theshawty said:
Custom kernels usually have a higher linux version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's right! ... But also the various Temasek, Googy, Siyah etc. to s3 are stationary to that version 3.0.xx, for what I wondered why even the custom kernel does not make a version upgrade
Volpe92 said:
It's right! ... But also the various Temasek, Googy, Siyah etc. to s3 are stationary to that version 3.0.xx, for what I wondered why even the custom kernel does not make a version upgrade
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The US S3's have the 3.4 kernel now I believe. They are all Qualcomm-equipped devices, though.
Theshawty said:
The US S3's have the 3.4 kernel now I believe. They are all Qualcomm-equipped devices, though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh .... then it is assumed to be due to the processor Exynos and its sources to blame? : (
We are forced to keep up with updates to Samsung?
If so I put his soul in peace because you are no longer heard from those sources : Angel:
Volpe92 said:
Oh .... then it is assumed to be due to the processor Exynos and its sources to blame? : (
We are forced to keep up with updates to Samsung?
If so I put his soul in peace because you are no longer heard from those sources : Angel:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think so, yeah.
Yes they're different kernel strains.
3.0.85 is the latest in one strain used in aosp (3rd July) released the same day as 3.4.52
https://www.kernel.org
They run in parallel
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
rootSU said:
Yes they're different kernel strains.
3.0.85 is the latest in one strain used in aosp (3rd July) released the same day as 3.4.52
https://www.kernel.org
They run in parallel
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for site
you see that needs to stay that way ...
In fact, I now mount the Temasek 3.0.85 great kernel
Last thing: but essentially have no difference the two versions?
Volpe92 said:
Thank you for site
you see that needs to stay that way ...
In fact, I now mount the Temasek 3.0.85 great kernel
Last thing: but essentially have no difference the two versions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
3.4 is supposedly better.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
3.4 over 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 introduces bugfixes (obviously) but more important, it introduces new "features".
I put features in " because often a new feature will be a hardware driver or a new protocol or method.
However, these new features wont be relevant to all hardware sets. For example, I don't need my s3 kernel to provide support for the latest broadcom Gigabit pci-x network card or update chipset drivers for the intel i7-540M laptop processors....
In 3.0.x we get the same bug fixes. There's really no point updating the base version if it doesn't include a feature we need.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
rootSU said:
3.4 over 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 introduces bugfixes (obviously) but more important, it introduces new "features".
I put features in " because often a new feature will be a hardware driver or a new protocol or method.
However, these new features wont be relevant to all hardware sets. For example, I don't need my s3 kernel to provide support for the latest broadcom Gigabit pci-x network card or update chipset drivers for the intel i7-540M laptop processors....
In 3.0.x we get the same bug fixes. There's really no point updating the base version if it doesn't include a feature we need.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have centered the answer : D this is what I wanted.
As you say you "run in parallel" : Highfive:
Thank you very much for your reply and to all those who responded
Volpe92 said:
As you say you "run in parallel"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep. From the link I posted on the last page, kernels 3.0, 3.2 and 3.4 are longterm support, meaning these kernels will continue to be updated for some time.
Related
[KERNEL] International FROST Kernel
NOTICE: This is COMPATIBLE with AOSP+ AND PureAosp JellyBean 4.3!
Just a statement regarding kernel source: The Kernel Source is of course covered under GPL version 2. Free software does NOT mean no work or time was spent working on it. I have donated a large sum of my free time to hack this kernel. If you use my modified kernel source in parts or in its entirety, I kindly ask you mention its origins and to send me a github pull request or PM whenever you find bugs or think you can help improve my kernel hack further. This way the entire community will truly benefit from the spirit of open source. Thank you !
THIS KERNEL IS CURRENTLY IN TESTING STATUS AND NOT BETA OR STABLE
*Features*
Quad Core is disabled by default, the X+ will now turn into a Dual core device (this can be changed with the performance governor)
Memory features are = to that of a 3.4 android kernel
more to come
XDA:DevDB Information
Frost, a Kernel for the HTC One X+
Contributors
Lloir, tombriden, corne, Maxwen, faux123
Kernel Special Features:
Version Information
Status: Testing
Created 2013-09-18
Last Updated 2013-09-30
Reserved
Reserved
Re: [KERNEL] SUPER WIP Pizza Kernel AT&T
Thb I know I dont have this phone but I planing on getting it and didn't see a linaro optimized just saying its a change of pace ...if u don't put it in its cool and anyone saying linaro doesn't do anything is crazy if its there why not use it ..its different could mean better
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app
don728871 said:
Thb I know I dont have this phone but I planing on getting it and didn't see a linaro optimized just saying its a change of pace ...if u don't put it in its cool and anyone saying linaro doesn't do anything is crazy if its there why not use it ..its different could mean better
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure the Linaro optimizations consist of both changes made to the Android Open Source Project (and CM) as well as a special toolchain that uses GCC 4.7. Because this is a kernel that is only offered in its source form, it is up to you to build it with the Linaro toolchain if you want to see the performance benefits that can arise from the Linaro optimizations. Also Lloir was somewhat specific in telling you not to make feature requests (I would consider Linaro such a request), so you might want to read his post a bit more closely next time.
The link doesn't work! It's dead link!
Can you fix it?
fantik_m said:
The link doesn't work! It's dead link!
Can you fix it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can go here. This is the most up to date that i could find.
TheJokah said:
You can go....... This is the most up to date that i could find.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks but same sh***it bro...
fantik_m said:
Thanks but same sh***it bro...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is a link to the kernel source. you would have to build the kernel yourself. if your looking for a CM kernel for ATT HOX+, then i would wait for a fully working CM rom first. There is still audio issues with CM, however devs are working on it. Be patient :laugh:
TheJokah said:
This is a link to the kernel source. you would have to build the kernel yourself. if your looking for a CM kernel for ATT HOX+, then i would wait for a fully working CM rom first. There is still audio issues with CM, however devs are working on it. Be patient :laugh:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and i'm ultra busy this month so i have VERY little time to debug or work on ATT X+
Lloir said:
and i'm ultra busy this month so i have VERY little time to debug or work on ATT X+
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can take as long as you want. Nobody is trying to rush your fantastic work. Keep it up bro! :highfive:
[No message]
Hey guys!
As you maybe know, we have the newest Android 4.4 but only a 3.0 Kernel. But we need the newer versions since Android is based of this new ones and if the gap between our version and Google's version is too big, it will take a long time to reach this. So i would say: "We need a newer kernel, let's go for it!" and i wanted to know if anybody is willing or if somebody is even able to port the 3.4 (or a newer version like 3.10 or 3.12) to our device to get better performance and to be safe to get all updates. If anybody is able and wants to help, please write it here or PM me. Also we should form a dev team to have the control over this project.
So if anybody is willing to, I will really appreciate it. I start this project on my own and you can join in to help and contribute your knowledge to this project. I will provide more info if needed. And yes, I know that it will be difficult but it is possible to reach the target.
Greets and best regards,
markey
If you want, have a look over here:Thread in development discussion section
Edit1: As i've seen in the poll, everybody (till now) wants the 3.4 kernel to be ported. So I have another question: Do you want me to port the 3.10 (or higher) Kernel also, after the 3.4 is running stable?
If yes, just write at the end of your post. Thanks. :good:
Edit2: I have decided to start porting the 3.1x+ Kernel based on dorimanx' sources first and then will try to port 3.4 cause 3.4 will have a better ability to be well integrated into Android till now and 3.10+ will take us one step further and keep us on track for the next Android versions which will be propably based on 3.8 or 3.10 Kernel.
If you have questions what this upgrade will (roughly) bring us, have a look at my last post in this thread.
This is great. It will be HARD, but, worth it. Just, maybe, this will see completion one day. I'll copy in kernel devs if I were you.
@DerTeufel1980
Sent from my Omni 4.4 Galaxy S3. Proud Googy Beta tester.
Great to see this! We need 3.4.x kernel!!
Regards :good:
Yes we can
tapatalked with my i9300
ROM: CyanogenMod 11
Kernel: Googy-Max2 (r3p2)
Googy to the rescue?!
Sent from my Omni 4.4 Galaxy S3. Proud Googy Beta tester.
It will be great!!!! Good luck, man:good:
Yes. Its gsear. Wait!!!
Sent from my GT-I9300 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Let the fun begin
Envoyé de mon GT-I9300 en utilisant Tapatalk
This a is a great quest ... my props to the dev !
About kernel
3.4 would be amazing
3.10/12 more than we ever could ask
Thanks for u guys doing what samsung never cared to do for us
Enviado do meu GT-I9300 através de Tapatalk
googy_anas said:
Let the fun begin
Envoyé de mon GT-I9300 en utilisant Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We have lift off!
Sent from my Nexus 7 (2014) using Tapatalk. My mobile is an Omni run Galaxy S3.
Stunning idea! I just wish I already had the knowledge and the time to help, but I really hope this takes off!
edit. go for 3.10-3.12 of course, the Sky's the limit, but 3.4 is a good stopgap as it runs on similar Samsung-devices ...
Someone could try merging dorimanx smdk4210 (s2) Kernel. He has already merged most of 3.13, and our s3 kernel is also working for s2, after cm had merged some parts.
Gesendet von meinem SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 mit Tapatalk 2
DerTeufel1980 said:
Someone could try merging dorimanx smdk4210 (s2) Kernel. He has already merged most of 3.13, and our s3 kernel is also working for s2, after cm had merged some parts.
Gesendet von meinem SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 mit Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for that great info DerTeufel, I will see when I can start to merge it and work on it. So it would mean, we could directly start at 3.13. Isn't that great? I will search for his git, and then i will compare our actual kernels with a 3.0 s2 kernel and see what i have to change. Most difficult part will be to get it booting...rest shouldn't be a thing that big. Let's wait and see.
markey97 said:
Thank you for that great info DerTeufel, I will see when I can start to merge it and work on it. So it would mean, we could directly start at 3.13. Isn't that great? I will search for his git, and then i will compare our actual kernels with a 3.0 s2 kernel and see what i have to change. Most difficult part will be to get it booting...rest shouldn't be a thing that big. Let's wait and see.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great idea! Hope it goes well.
Sent from my Nexus 7 (2014) using Tapatalk. My mobile is an Omni run Galaxy S3.
Maybe stupid question, this kernel will be used only on AOSP Roms?, or may run on sammy roms?
niikko said:
Maybe stupid question, this kernel will be used only on AOSP Roms?, or may run on sammy roms?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No its no stupid question, just ask if you want to know anything. You're welcome and i am here to answer questions :good:
And now to your question: For now, its meant to run on AOSP ROMs and then afterwards, I will take a deeper look and see if I can get it running good on Sammy, so just wait a bit
And I think I will add features of googy-max kernel, devil-kernel, boeffla-kernel...whatever you want, just write it then when its running fine, and i will try to add it.
I also already thought about adding dual-boot, so yes, you will most likely see Sammy support in this kernel. And afterwards, I will try to make it a kexec kernel and get multiROM or sth like this running, to have e.g. Android and Ubuntu Touch on 1 single device
dat shi cray
samisax said:
dat shi cray
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What do you want to say with that?
Does this have any sense?
Very nice initiative. Devs in SGS Plus (i9001) also made a fully working 3.4 kernel from the scratch (CAF sources at least ) and now they can release KitKat without pains
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk
sanefirst said:
Very nice initiative. Devs in SGS Plus (i9001) also made a fully working 3.4 kernel from the scratch (CAF sources at least ) and now they can release KitKat without pains
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha I know, I own this device myself and followed all developement of the 3.4 Kernel and all other work done by ADC team. :good: They used CAF sources but we will use sources from dorimanx cause we have an exynos processor.
Erik is a good dev, isn't he? Thanks to him we also got dual boot and I think we can also get further versions of Android thanks to ADC team.
Well, we will see how good I can get this working in a short time.
linux kernel 4.1 released why are we still using 3.0? I am just wondering
nhmanas said:
linux kernel 4.1 released why are we still using 3.0? I am just wondering
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Porting a new linux kernel to a device is not simple. It brings a lot of stability issues if the kernel version is too new, and so most developers stick with a LTS release such as v3.4.104. Most s2 kernels are at kernel version 3.0.101 because it is found to be stable, and so they stick with the mentality that 'if it ain't broke, don't fix it'.
gsstudios said:
Porting a new linux kernel to a device is not simple. It brings a lot of stability issues if the kernel version is too new, and so most developers stick with a LTS release such as v3.4.104. Most s2 kernels are at kernel version 3.0.101 because it is found to be stable, and so they stick with the mentality that 'if it ain't broke, don't fix it'.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I really love your kernel and you are the new kernel master of i9100 now for me. Then why don't you use v3.4.104? My friend's phone is s4 mini and he is using a v3.4.x.x kernel. I think it is stable to use
nhmanas said:
I really love your kernel and you are the new kernel master of i9100 now for me. Then why don't you use v3.4.104? My friend's phone is s4 mini and he is using a v3.4.x.x kernel. I think it is stable to use
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Honestly, I think I don't have enough developing experience to do such task chhapil is also thinking to update linux version, but is also unsure whether to upgrade to a newer version or downgrade to 3.4.104.
gsstudios said:
Honestly, I think I don't have enough developing experience to do such task chhapil is also thinking to update linux version, but is also unsure whether to upgrade to a newer version or downgrade to 3.4.104.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for your replies. I have 2 more questions.
1. What are the pros of upgrading 3.4.104 kernel
2. So our device is official cm12.1 now and sources are online. Will you release a lollipop kernel?
nhmanas said:
Thank you for your replies. I have 2 more questions.
1. What are the pros of upgrading 3.4.104 kernel
2. So our device is official cm12.1 now and sources are online. Will you release a lollipop kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-s2/development-derivatives/kernel-dorimanx-lp-5-x-x-t3145879
nhmanas said:
Thank you for your replies. I have 2 more questions.
1. What are the pros of upgrading 3.4.104 kernel
2. So our device is official cm12.1 now and sources are online. Will you release a lollipop kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. Some pros of updating Linux kernel could include increased speed and security (since 3.0.101 kernels are not updated anymore) .
2. I guess you didn't see my Sig? Noppy already linked my dorimanx lp kernel thread. Yes, it works perfectly with cm12.1, however doesn't work yet on other roms like paranoid android and slimlp.
gsstudios said:
1. Some pros of updating Linux kernel could include increased speed and security (since 3.0.101 kernels are not updated anymore) .
2. I guess you didn't see my Sig? Noppy already linked my dorimanx lp kernel thread. Yes, it works perfectly with cm12.1, however doesn't work yet on other roms like paranoid android and slimlp.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
omg thats what I'm waiting for thanks for all mate
Will this phone ever see official Cyanogenmod roms?
No. Le will never release kernel sources. So you will never have pure CM roms. The CM roms will be based on official ones like 16S, 17S etc.
sanke1 said:
No. Le will never release kernel sources. So you will never have pure CM roms. The CM roms will be based on official ones like 16S, 17S etc.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
zsajak said:
Will this phone ever see official Cyanogenmod roms?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Never say never it's being worked on
deadman96385 said:
Never say never it's being worked on
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Without the kernel sources?
zsajak said:
Without the kernel sources?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With the kernel source
deadman96385 said:
With the kernel source
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought they are not going to release the sources?
zsajak said:
I thought they are not going to release the sources?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
deadman96385 said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure I understand
deadman96385 said:
With the kernel source
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think the kernel sources have been leaked or some enterprising dude has managed to extract the device tree.
sanke1 said:
I think the kernel sources have been leaked or some enterprising dude has managed to extract the device tree.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That would be fantastic, lack of cyanogenmod is the only thing that keeps me from buying the device.
deadman96385 said:
Never say never it's being worked on
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could you maybe be clearer on this? How likely is it that this is actually going to happen?
I don't know @deadman96385, but i think if a User which such "Experience" in a Community like XDA Developers tells you that the kernel sources may be release, i think you just have to be a Little bit Patient and anytime your dreams will be fulfilled... am i right deadman?
Antisound said:
I don't know @deadman96385, but i think if a User which such "Experience" in a Community like XDA Developers tells you that the kernel sources may be release, i think you just have to be a Little bit Patient and anytime your dreams will be fulfilled... am i right deadman?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct
Antisound said:
I don't know @deadman96385, but i think if a User which such "Experience" in a Community like XDA Developers tells you that the kernel sources may be release, i think you just have to be a Little bit Patient and anytime your dreams will be fulfilled... am i right deadman?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I guess, its just this is the key reason whether I decide to buy this phone or not, dont want to be stuck with chinese roms in the future.
Hi,
Well we already have resurrection remix which is more than decent.
OK... Maybe with a precompiled kernel but still.
I use it as a daily driver and encountered no problems so far except for a slightly too high battery drain.
But a device tree would allow to build other ROMs which would be really cool...
Regards
@deadman96385 it's already in the mid of september.. do you still see any realistic chance that we're gonna see some kernel source or a cyanogenmod in the future. if you do.. of which timeframe do we talk? days, weeks months?
NexusPenguin said:
Hi,
Well we already have resurrection remix which is more than decent.
OK... Maybe with a precompiled kernel but still.
I use it as a daily driver and encountered no problems so far except for a slightly too high battery drain.
But a device tree would allow to build other ROMs which would be really cool...
Regards
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What are the main disadvantages between precompiled kernel and the use of kernel sources?
Also, I recommend checking htcmania Spain forum, because Parasite_remix is cooking Mooke and CM13 ROMs with 17S firmware.
chemavilla said:
What are the main disadvantages between precompiled kernel and the use of kernel sources?
Also, I recommend checking htcmania Spain forum, because Parasite_remix is cooking Mooke and CM13 ROMs with 17S firmware.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
With the custom kernel, that one can be "optimized" for the device and all missing drivers can be added. At least, that is what I have been told but I'd be glad to be proven wrong.
For the htcmania link : thanks a ton, but I don't think I'll use it.
I sold the x820. Battery drain was really too high and even with moderate use, I could barely get through the day
Finding a replacement was tough, but I am trying the Xiaomi mi5 and Moto X Style (Pure) to see if they can do the job...
Both have flaws the x820 had not. And I honestly must admit that I am missing the x820 already
Regards.
NexusPenguin said:
Hi,
With the custom kernel, that one can be "optimized" for the device and all missing drivers can be added. At least, that is what I have been told but I'd be glad to be proven wrong.
For the htcmania link : thanks a ton, but I don't think I'll use it.
I sold the x820. Battery drain was really too high and even with moderate use, I could barely get through the day
Finding a replacement was tough, but I am trying the Xiaomi mi5 and Moto X Style (Pure) to see if they can do the job...
Both have flaws the x820 had not. And I honestly must admit that I am missing the x820 already
Regards.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pretty bad to hear this.
Sadly though, more and more people are leaving the Le Max2 camp. If only they would release the sources...
Anyhow, good luck with your next device
chemavilla said:
What are the main disadvantages between precompiled kernel and the use of kernel sources?
Also, I recommend checking htcmania Spain forum, because Parasite_remix is cooking Mooke and CM13 ROMs with 17S firmware.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are a few problems with using prebuilt kernels.
1. Upstream changes in Android source code might need related kernel changes, if you don't have the kernel source you can't do this.
2. For the same reason, you may be stuck on old android versions if the kernel isn't compatible with newer versions
3 Vendor may have customized some android frameworks and made related kernel changes. As CM wouldn't have these changed frameworks, some features may not work (although this doesn't appear to be an issue with this phone as the CM builds for it seems to be fully functional)
After compiling roms for a couple devices and learning about the android rom, i have decided to dabble in the arts
of kernel compiling, i started with my main device the Nexus 6p, learnt a fair bit compiling kernels for it, so i decided to
come back to this device for testing purposes and trying to test and go back to ARM device which is completely different.
Now with the Nexus device i went full updated linux kernel first then gave updates, but this time ill be doing something a little
different, i will upstream some kernel updates, plus caf updates then i will give a release, or for example, the first realease i will
give you guys will be 3.4.2 kernel version, just to get things going, then next release will be a higher version.
I hope all of you like it i will be adding alot of stuff in the coming months.
All releases will keep up to date and working with latest CM roms
Here is the download link just click on the kernel and it will download
XDA:DevDB Information
WinXkernel, Kernel for the LG G3
Contributors
winxuser
Source Code: [url]https://github.com/winxdroid/android_kernel_lge_g3[/URL]
Kernel Special Features:
Version Information
Status: Testing
Created 2017-02-08
Last Updated 2017-02-15
CHANGELOG
15/02/17
updated to 3.4.15
added adreno idler
added new powersuspend
added power efficient workqueue
added voltage control
added kcal
08/02/17
Latest LineageOS kernel update
Updated to 3.4.2
it is compatible to stock rom or fulmics rom?
No it's not, this is for lineageos nougat roms
Could you please give us more info about this kernel? Thanks in advance.
Ducatuca said:
Could you please give us more info about this kernel? Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well at the moment it's stock lineage kernel,, I am currently upstream IMG the current 3.4.x updates, and it will also have alot of improvements
really good to see another dev on g3 , thanks for effords ! i will try as soon as possible.
Can you inform me about the kernel versions i dont quite understand what the differences are
Thanks
lintol23 said:
Can you inform me about the kernel versions i dont quite understand what the differences are
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok so stock stock kernel you get with stock rom or even custom like CyanogenMod/lineageos has a kernel version of 3.4, each incremental update after that eg 3.4.1 or even 3.4.100 has many fixes and updates within the kernel, some do nothing for our device but others can, a small code change in one file can impact the way the kernel works
karasumert98 said:
really good to see another dev on g3 , thanks for effords ! i will try as soon as possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No worries I have had this device for many years tried, got a new device and just forgot about it lol, like I said I had been working on the Nexus 6p that I have and decided to try out with this one
This kernel reboots after a short period on rr5.8...
kehne said:
This kernel reboots after a short period on rr5.8...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont know good.. But rr is lineage? This kernel is for lineage if i good understand
Sealant said:
I dont know good.. But rr is lineage? This kernel is for lineage if i good understand
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep, RR based on linage. So basically it should work, but after 10-30sec the ROM reboots
I can't wait for up to 3.4.113
What devices does this kernel support? I have the vs985
Does this work on all lg g3 variants ?. Because I dont want to flash this and brick my lg g3 d852. Thanks
MaddMaxx636 said:
What devices does this kernel support? I have the vs985
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
TeamAndroid14 said:
Does this work on all lg g3 variants ?. Because I dont want to flash this and brick my lg g3 d852. Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This kernel only supports d855 as it is the device I have
kehne said:
This kernel reboots after a short period on rr5.8...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I'm running latest lineageos and I have never had it reboot on me. Are you using any kernel manager apps at all, as I haven't been able to add and customisation to it just it. It may panic because it's reaching for something it doesn't have
No reboots here either,
Im running the latest official Lineage .
if u have kernel mod or any other kernel tuner installed try to go back to your basic settings or just delete the app and install it again after your first boot.
Really smooth kernel !
Hi... Can you had the savoca Patch to use with Wheatstone.apk? Can use my phone without it
Enviado do meu LG-D855 através de Tapatalk