Been searching for kernel that has android 4.3 support, I was on Dorimax kernel but unfortunately its not working for me, I found the kangbang kernel but its not working for me either, any ideas?
I'm looking more in kernels that has good battery life and support 4.3. thanks..
I'm running cm10.2 btw.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
chelv19 said:
Been searching for kernel that has android 4.3 support, I was on Dorimax kernel but unfortunately its not working for me, I found the kangbang kernel but its not working for me either, any ideas?
I'm looking more in kernels that has good battery life and support 4.3. thanks..
I'm running cm10.2 btw.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What do you mean "not working for you"?? There's an AOSP kernel by Gustavo_s as well, but I don't know if it's been updated for 4.3 yet. That's pretty much your options AFAIK. I use Dori & it works great. So what issues are you having? A kernel doesn't just "not work".
Hopper8 said:
What do you mean "not working for you"?? There's an AOSP kernel by Gustavo_s as well, but I don't know if it's been updated for 4.3 yet. That's pretty much your options AFAIK. I use Dori & it works great. So what issues are you having? A kernel doesn't just "not work".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the battery, my battery seems to drain fast..
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Paradroid 3.99 the best ROM
Sent from my GT-i9100 using xda app-developers app
Related
Hey
This last weekend I rooted and installed different roms to try. Most of them still have poor wifi performance, just like stock.
Is there a way to make wifi better? Maybe flashing a new kernel, a new modem or something?
Thanks.
Modems/Radios are meant for Service network provider thingies, like your signal. Whereas, Kernels are for more "internal" things, they affect battery life and WIFI.
so i suggest you flash a custom kernel that best suits you
I hope this helps!
Thanks!
I was thinking of trying siyah kernel. Is it the best one for Wi-Fi performance or is there another one better?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Sensamic said:
Thanks!
I was thinking of trying siyah kernel. Is it the best one for Wi-Fi performance or is there another one better?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you're on ICS, Siyah and Franco both worked well for me, if you're on JB, Siyah alpha/beta builds are the only option until the i9300 sources are released.
dantheman122 said:
If you're on ICS, Siyah and Franco both worked well for me, if you're on JB, Siyah alpha/beta builds are the only option until the i9300 sources are released.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Despite Siyah is on beta build for jb, it's very stable...
Sensamic said:
Thanks!
I was thinking of trying siyah kernel. Is it the best one for Wi-Fi performance or is there another one better?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I cant quite tell cause it's a matter of how you set it.. but imo, siyah is the bomb
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
I flashed siyah 1.5.3 with CM10 teamasek rom but wifi still doesnt work. I dont options for wifi inside Stweaks.
I will keep trying with other roms.
What I want is the best combo for the best wifi performance. Best combo rom - kernel - whatever. I really need to improve my wifi performance at home.
is Project Butter working on leak Xxlsj Rom or any Custom rom ?
can you guys please clarify if is working or not ?
Any custom rom support project butter ?
Project butter is working on the leaked XXLSJ rom and all the custom roms based on XXLSJ (like NeatRom v4.0, Wanamlite v13, etcetera).
Project butter isn't working on CM10 nightlies and all the CM10 based roms...
(You should post this in the Q & A forum, and with the search function you would get the answer)
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Are you sure? latest jellybam rom supports hwconposer api 0.3 and open gralloc, those parts are supposed to make project butter work, am i wrong?
This much stuttering is not possible with butter. I'm on chameleon based on LSJ and it shows sign of lag which CM doesn't even without butter, I'm on this ROM coz of camera.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
Sh4Dy said:
This much stuttering is not possible with butter. I'm on chameleon based on LSJ and it shows sign of lag which CM doesn't even without butter, I'm on this ROM coz of camera.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To be fair this is a leaked ROM. Samsung don't even intend us to use it. We should wait for the official build. I'm sure there will be a big difference
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
Sh4Dy said:
This much stuttering is not possible with butter. I'm on chameleon based on LSJ and it shows sign of lag which CM doesn't even without butter, I'm on this ROM coz of camera.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try running stock LSJ then we can talk about this again.
MaKTaiL said:
Try running stock LSJ then we can talk about this again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It isn't that great. CM 10 is definitely smoother
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
MaKTaiL said:
Try running stock LSJ then we can talk about this again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was on stock lsj for long. The day izap released I flashed it. Its debloated so should be smoother.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
---------- Post added at 03:27 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:24 PM ----------
fatjivi said:
To be fair this is a leaked ROM. Samsung don't even intend us to use it. We should wait for the official build. I'm sure there will be a big difference
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Precisely, I've heard even S3 JB didn't have butter working. Tell you what, codeworkx, entropy and espen have worked more than Samsung's whole team who worked on Samsung JB, read the whole saga in Entropy's G+ post.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
Sh4Dy said:
Precisely, I've heard even S3 JB didn't have butter working. Tell you what, codeworkx, entropy and espen have worked more than Samsung's whole team who worked on Samsung JB, read the whole saga in Entropy's G+ post.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I read then whole thing. Its on the cm10 thread as well. Not the whole story I guess, but enough to understand Samsung is just trolling us and have no intention of helping. They constantly promise source codes and then release some outdated crap which we don't even need. Either they are retarded or just doing this for laughs. Either way its these guys who are keeping the s2 alive coz Sammy dev team is too busy smoking pot. I too am on chameleon ROM due to the bugs on cm(thanks to Sammy and their top secret source codes)
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
fatjivi said:
It isn't that great. CM 10 is definitely smoother
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no its not.
i was running cm10 for more than 3 month and the ss leak is waaay smoother.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
carlocarrera said:
no its not.
i was running cm10 for more than 3 month and the ss leak is waaay smoother.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is something debatable. So there can be no definite answer to this.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
carlocarrera said:
no its not.
i was running cm10 for more than 3 month and the ss leak is waaay smoother.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM10(non vsync) with Siyah kernel is butttterrrryyyy! no lag whatsoever. Samsung one has microlag. stuttering, this discussion won't ever come to a conclusion but I find official builds to be smoother than vsync one. Try it with Siyah and your mind will be blown! Samsung one is smoother in some areas but lags in some and texture distortion. Gfx are messed up.
xp
Sh4Dy said:
CM10(non vsync) with Siyah kernel is butttterrrryyyy! no lag whatsoever. Samsung one has microlag. stuttering, this discussion won't ever come to a conclusion but I find official builds to be smoother than vsync one. Try it with Siyah and your mind will be blown! Samsung one is smoother in some areas but lags in some and texture distortion. Gfx are messed up.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:victory:
I have found some roms with vSync experimental builds. Did anyone tried it ? what are your opinions?
I am currently using 4.0.3 LP9 with Siyah 5.0.1, There is no micro lag whatsoever but still i want to upgrade to the latest 4.1.2 leak to taste.o
+1 @ sammy's leak is smoother than cm10
Can't wait for official JB next week :thumbup:
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
Chairmansaab said:
xp
:victory:
I have found some roms with vSync experimental builds. Did anyone tried it ? what are your opinions?
I am currently using 4.0.3 LP9 with Siyah 5.0.1, There is no micro lag whatsoever but still i want to upgrade to the latest 4.1.2 leak to taste.o
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most buttery experience allround official Cm10 (not 10.1) with Siyah, or Chameleon ROM based on JB, it is smooth but lags sometimes.
I used to love vsync but now it's no more that smooth.
Edit: Ah, fu*k it, I'm off.
Someone who can guide me with this????
CM10.1/Semaphore
daworship said:
Someone who can guide me with this????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm really enjoying CM10.1 (latest nightlies) with Semaphore kernel.
n8r said:
I'm really enjoying CM10.1 (latest nightlies) with Semaphore kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
how's the battery life? and how stable is that build?
daworship said:
how's the battery life? and how stable is that build?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Battery life is excellent (all-day; I charge at night so I haven't seen it go any longer)
CM10.1 runs stable -- I've had days of uptime and no crashes.
I recommend baked or super nexus both in dev section. And my unofficial semaphore with customers features kernel
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda premium
cannondaleV2000 said:
I recommend baked or super nexus both in dev section. And my unofficial semaphore with customers features kernel
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Uhhu pulling ng for your own stuff. If that's the case I have three ports Ive created and hopefully I'll be uploading liquid smooth
Sent from my HTC One S using xda app-developers app
n8r said:
Battery life is excellent (all-day; I charge at night so I haven't seen it go any longer)
CM10.1 runs stable -- I've had days of uptime and no crashes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice, is this with heavy use or normal?
daworship said:
Nice, is this with heavy use or normal?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just normal.
n8r said:
Just normal.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Should i try the new version of the semaphore kernel?
Yeah it works great
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda premium
Is anyone out there using a non-Semaphore based kernel?
In my experience, Phore (and its variants) is fast & smooth, but for reasons I have yet to surprise, after a few days my poor refurb can't handle it & becomes a kernel panic landmine.
Again, not bashing Semaphore (why would I? It's awesome).
Just looking for something that might prove more stable on MY finicky phone besides the stock CM kernel.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD
Try devil. Are you on a 4.1.2 or 4?2.2 ROM?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda premium
cannondaleV2000 said:
Try devil. Are you on a 4.1.2 or 4?2.2 ROM?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
4.2.2 in ever changing rotations.
Haven't tried Devil in a few months, so maybe I'll five it a swing.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD
I am using the NEAK Kernel on the Illusion ROM. Any setup settings for kernel that are incredible? Not new to flashing or romming or rooting just looking for opinions so don't wanna hear none that noob junk.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda premium
nickhex89 said:
I am using the NEAK Kernel on the Illusion ROM. Any setup settings for kernel that are incredible? Not new to flashing or romming or rooting just looking for opinions so don't wanna hear none that noob junk.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey is that kernel overckock capable and can I use it on pac man 4.3?
Nope, 4.2 kernels don't work with 4.3
Sent from my VZW Note II using XDA DEV
NEAK is generally built around installing and letting it do it's thing. The engine app has modes you can select that do most of the work. Honestly I just let it do it's thing and it's fine. Now the sounds app is another story.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda premium
I am running neak on carbon ROM. And let me tell you, its a beast. I installed the uneak engine app and chose the battery saver option and I have been getting at least 7 hours screen time and around 18 hours total time. Thats under heavy use. If into light I'm sure I could get a day or two.
veloct said:
Nope, 4.2 kernels don't work with 4.3
Sent from my VZW Note II using XDA DEV
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually.....I've got N.E.A.K. running on Paranoid Android 4.3 Alpha without a hitch. I figured I'd give it a shot and see if it boots, and to my surprise, it does and worked. I reverted back to 4.2.2 because of some other graphics anomalies which were outlined in the CM and PA threads.
I just switched to alliance rom recently and and need to find the link to the most updated neak kernel again anyone with link info?
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda premium
Go to the thread in my signature, it's in there.
Thanks for your help
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda premium