bat script to check if android is rooted - Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

can anyone help me out with an
adb bat script that will check weather android is rooted
root files are located
superSU -- /system/app
su binary -- /system/xbin symlinked to /system/bin
i can find functions but nothing that is adb bat script.
any help would he appriciated.

Related

[Q] Not rooted anymore?!!

i Rooted my phone a few months ago and installed a few roms but didnt like any of my options so i kept the phone rooted with the stock look. now i want to try a new rom and my phone is telling me my phone isnt rooted any more...
any suggestions??
What is telling you that you are not rooted? Like trying to run certain root apps? How did you root? Which bootloader? Does is say s-on or s-off?
Sent from the MIUI powered 3d
the rejection i am getting on rom manager is "an error occured while attempting to run privileged commands... sorry i am kinda a beginner on my 3D..rooting on my evo prior was so much simpler...and i used to use shoot me and all of a sudden it couldnt acess root permissions...
on my boot screen it says
s-off
hboot1.4.1000
radio 0.97.10.0530
ramseyattar said:
the rejection i am getting on rom manager is "an error occured while attempting to run privileged commands... sorry i am kinda a beginner on my 3D..rooting on my evo prior was so much simpler...and i used to use shoot me and all of a sudden it couldnt acess root permissions...
on my boot screen it says
s-off
hboot1.4.1000
radio 0.97.10.0530
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you have superuser installed on your phone?
ramseyattar said:
the rejection i am getting on rom manager is "an error occured while attempting to run privileged commands... sorry i am kinda a beginner on my 3D..rooting on my evo prior was so much simpler...and i used to use shoot me and all of a sudden it couldnt acess root permissions...
on my boot screen it says
s-off
hboot1.4.1000
radio 0.97.10.0530
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
looks like your bootloader is still unlocked, which is a very good sign.
more than likely the permissions on your root access where changed at some point in time. either from loading a ROM or removing/adding superuser.apk incorrectly.
my application, root checker pro, will show all the necessary information in order to troubleshoot.
my guess would be, you'll probably need to install the superuser.zip file from recovery mode and that should add the /system/bin/su binary for Superuser.apk back and set the permissions as 4755 on the su binary. this is the most common and simplist method of properly restoring root access for Superuser.apk users.
if you want, feel free to post up the root checker pro results and we can specifically troubleshoot. hope that helps!
joeykrim said:
looks like your bootloader is still unlocked, which is a very good sign.
more than likely the permissions on your root access where changed at some point in time. either from loading a ROM or removing/adding superuser.apk incorrectly.
my application, root checker pro, will show all the necessary information in order to troubleshoot.
my guess would be, you'll probably need to install the superuser.zip file from recovery mode and that should add the /system/bin/su binary for Superuser.apk back and set the permissions as 4755 on the su binary. this is the most common and simplist method of properly restoring root access for Superuser.apk users.
if you want, feel free to post up the root checker pro results and we can specifically troubleshoot. hope that helps!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
my results were:
Root Access is not properly configured or was not granted.
The following link is a suggested Guide for obtaining root access on your device. No guarantee the guide will work. Please use the guide with CAUTION!! Suggested guide for your device:
http://www.revolutionary.io/
Superuser.apk - com.noshufou.android.su - version 3.0.6 is installed!
System Environment PATH: /sbin /vendor/bin /system/sbin /system/bin /system/xbin
The adb binary is set to default shell user access as a standard non-root user
Standard su binary location: ls -l /system/bin/su:
---xr---wt root root 26324 2011-08-12 15:27 su
Standard su binary location: ls -l /system/xbin/su:
lrwxrwxrwx root root 2011-09-07 20:28 su -> /system/bin/su
Alternate su binary location:
/sbin/su: Permission denied
Alternate su type binary location:
/system/xbin/sudo: No such file or directory
SU binary not found or not operating properly
ramseyattar said:
my results were:
Root Access is not properly configured or was not granted.
The following link is a suggested Guide for obtaining root access on your device. No guarantee the guide will work. Please use the guide with CAUTION!! Suggested guide for your device:
http://www.revolutionary.io/
Superuser.apk - com.noshufou.android.su - version 3.0.6 is installed!
System Environment PATH: /sbin /vendor/bin /system/sbin /system/bin /system/xbin
The adb binary is set to default shell user access as a standard non-root user
Standard su binary location: ls -l /system/bin/su:
---xr---wt root root 26324 2011-08-12 15:27 su
Standard su binary location: ls -l /system/xbin/su:
lrwxrwxrwx root root 2011-09-07 20:28 su -> /system/bin/su
Alternate su binary location:
/sbin/su: Permission denied
Alternate su type binary location:
/system/xbin/sudo: No such file or directory
SU binary not found or not operating properly
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Those results are perfect in that they show exactly what the issue is!
If you are familar with ADB, the process is very simple to fix your root access. I've done this many times! A basic but important process to learn, in my opinion.
Reboot to recovery, from a computer type, adb shell and issue two commands as follows:
mount /system /system
chmod 4755 /system/bin/su
go ahead and reboot.
Alternatively, if you're not familar with adb, the next simpliest approach, in my opinion would be to load the Superuser-3.0.6-efgh-signed.zip file onto your sdcard. reboot into recovery and "flash"/install the .zip file. The superuser.zip file will execute the above commands for you.
Run Root Checker Pro again and it should trigger superuser prompting whether or not to grant root checker access. go ahead and grant it root access.
Root Checker Pro should confirm you have root access and for the /system/bin/su line it should show an "s" in the middle of the permissions, example: rwxsr-xr-x root root 26324 2011-08-12 15:27 su . the "s" being in the middle is important as this is the setuid bit essentially granting the su binary superuser permission/access.
Reasons the permissions were changed on the /system/bin/su binary ... really hard to say but we can narrow down the causes. In order to change the permission, the process/device/application would need root access. Everything executed in recovery mode usually runs as root and many users don't inspect the updater-script file of the ROM .zip before they load.
Sometimes flashing ROMs, which aren't setup properly, will remove or set incorrect permissions removing the setuid bit on the su binary.
Also, flashing an OTA file would definitely remove the setuid bit on the su binary.
Hope that helps!

[Q] Busybox

Hey,
So a few months ago, I installed either an older version of Busybox, or the newer version I installed never stuck. Basically, I have two folders that contain the busybox commands: /sbin and /system/xbin. In Terminal Emu., when I enter a Busybox command, it seems to only acknowledge the older folder (/sbin). eg if I type in "busybox ifconfig..." or "busybox ipconfig...." I'm told that there's no such command, in so many words. How do I go about fixing this?
Would it mess anything up if I moved the contents of the newer folder (/system/xbin) into /sbin ?
Also, should there be a busybox file located anywhere (ie a file in root that's executed when "busybox" is typed into Term. Emu?) I can only locate the one in the internal sdcard directory ("busybox-stericon")
Thanks
bumpity
alljokingaside said:
Hey,
So a few months ago, I installed either an older version of Busybox, or the newer version I installed never stuck. Basically, I have two folders that contain the busybox commands: /sbin and /system/xbin. In Terminal Emu., when I enter a Busybox command, it seems to only acknowledge the older folder (/sbin). eg if I type in "busybox ifconfig..." or "busybox ipconfig...." I'm told that there's no such command, in so many words. How do I go about fixing this?
Would it mess anything up if I moved the contents of the newer folder (/system/xbin) into /sbin ?
Also, should there be a busybox file located anywhere (ie a file in root that's executed when "busybox" is typed into Term. Emu?) I can only locate the one in the internal sdcard directory ("busybox-stericon")
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm no expert, but based on my experience with Linux, I'd say that the safest thing to do would be to create a symbolic link of all the files in /system/xbin/busybox (or wherever) to /sbin/busybox (or wherever)
If you could post the directory listings of "/sbin" and "/system/xbin" it might help.
alljokingaside said:
Hey,
So a few months ago, I installed either an older version of Busybox, or the newer version I installed never stuck. Basically, I have two folders that contain the busybox commands: /sbin and /system/xbin. In Terminal Emu., when I enter a Busybox command, it seems to only acknowledge the older folder (/sbin). eg if I type in "busybox ifconfig..." or "busybox ipconfig...." I'm told that there's no such command, in so many words. How do I go about fixing this?
Would it mess anything up if I moved the contents of the newer folder (/system/xbin) into /sbin ?
Also, should there be a busybox file located anywhere (ie a file in root that's executed when "busybox" is typed into Term. Emu?) I can only locate the one in the internal sdcard directory ("busybox-stericon")
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is a directory hierarchy in the Android file system.
You can normally see three different directories for binaries. These have the following priority:
/system/bin
/system/xbin
/sbin
This means that if there are two binaries with the same filename, the binary in the more prioritised map will be executed.
In your case, the /system/xbin has a higher priority than /sbin.
As I see it, you have the following choices:
Keep them co-existing. To select an indiviual binary, enter
/sbin/busybox [function] [arguments]
or
/system/xbin/busybox [function] [arguments].
Remove the unwanted one.
If you are unsure of which you want to discard,
just enter the commands as written in the first choice (without any functions of course).
I hope this post helps you.

[Q] K47 / C9_89 an S3 Clone [Solved]

OK, I'm running into difficulties with this phone..
..It arrive pre-rooted, I installed Titanium Backup and removed iReader.
In the Play store I noticed that SuperUser and Google Keyboard needing updating but when I tried to do so all I got was "Error Installing - Package file was not signed correctly" which I assume has something to do with a slightly different version of the program initially installed?
Then I went into SuperUser itself, clicked on the spanner icon, scrolled down and tapped on the check for updates button..
..indeed it found an update and proceeded to update in a similar style terminal box.
However.. according to Titanium I no longer have root access, I quickly downloaded Root Checker Basic which also confirmed this.. bugger I thought.
Moving onwards, I just downloaded SRS Root from srsroot.com. Tried rooting and it exited out saying I already had root access.. hmmm, so then I removed root access, the phone rebooted and then I re-applied the root.
Although I am still suffering from not having proper root access :crying:
Please help me to get full root access back again, thanks in advance. :angel:
SpongeR0b said:
OK, I'm running into difficulties with this phone..
..It arrive pre-rooted, I installed Titanium Backup and removed iReader.
In the Play store I noticed that SuperUser and Google Keyboard needing updating but when I tried to do so all I got was "Error Installing - Package file was not signed correctly" which I assume has something to do with a slightly different version of the program initially installed?
Then I went into SuperUser itself, clicked on the spanner icon, scrolled down and tapped on the check for updates button..
..indeed it found an update and proceeded to update in a similar style terminal box.
However.. according to Titanium I no longer have root access, I quickly downloaded Root Checker Basic which also confirmed this.. bugger I thought.
Moving onwards, I just downloaded SRS Root from srsroot.com. Tried rooting and it exited out saying I already had root access.. hmmm, so then I removed root access, the phone rebooted and then I re-applied the root.
Although I am still suffering from not having proper root access :crying:
Please help me to get full root access back again, thanks in advance. :angel:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
UPDATE : After running Root Checker Pro it told me that SuperSU wasn't installed.. I downloaded that from the play store and re ran Root Checker Pro, it now tells me..
Root Access is not properly configured or was not granted.
Super User Application Status:
SuperSU application - version 1.91 - is installed!
System File Properties for Root Access:
Standard Location
Check Command: ls -l /system/bin/su:
Result: /system/bin/su: No such file or directory
Analysis: File /system/bin/su does not exist.
Standard Location
Check Command: ls -l /system/xbin/su:
Result: -rwsr-sr-x root root 22364 2014-01-27 21:08 su
Analysis: Setuid attribute is present and root user ownership is present. Root access is correctly configured for this file! Executing this file can grant root access!
Alternative Location
Check Command: ls -l /sbin/su:
Result: /sbin/su: Permission denied
Analysis: File system permissions restricted and denied access.
Alternative Location
Check Command: ls -l /system/xbin/sudo:
Result: /system/xbin/sudo: No such file or directory
Analysis: File /system/xbin/sudo does not exist.
Root User ID and Group ID Status:
SU binary not found or not operating properly
System Environment PATH: /sbin /vendor/bin /system/sbin /system/bin /system/xbin
ADB Shell Default User:
ADB shell setting for standard access, stored in default.prop, is configured as: root user - ro.secure=0
Results provided on your K47/C9_89 device by Root Checker Pro version 1.3.4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I still have Root Explorer on the phone and seem to be able to navigate through the normally hidden directories.
Suggestions please!
To my surprise, I bit the bullet today and reset my phone to stock defaults..
..unfortunately even this still did not fix the incomplete root
Please help!
EDIT : I've been tinkering again.. Here's what I understand (and what I've done)
System\bin\ - Kinda not the most important place to store a file relating to an installed .apk's
System\xbin\ - The more important place (kinda like the System32 directory) relaing to installed .apk's
System\app\ - The directory where the .apk file's themselves live (kinda like Program Files\xxx Application)
Well I noticed I had an .apk in apps called root_Superuser.apk and this was present even after un-rooting my phone.
I removed this file, using these commands :
adb remount
adb pull /system/app/root_Superuser.apk
Seemingly this didn't remove the file, so then I tried :
adb remount
abd shell rm -f /system/app/root_Superuser.apk
After a quick reboot this had indeed removed Superuser, then I reused the SRS Tool to re-root.
Then I read that SU 3.0.2 was a safer bet.. (although it was a post from 2011 - attached)
So I downloaded that and proceeded to push the superuser.apk and su files into their correct places (as below)
adb remount
adb push superuser.apk /system/app/
adb push su /system/xbin/
adb push su /system/bin/
After the files were correctly in place I needed to set the correct file permissions, I did this as follows :
abd shell
[email protected]:/ # CHMOD 644 /system/app/superuser.apk
[email protected]:/ # CHMOD 777 /system/xbin/su
[email protected]:/ # CHMOD 777 /system/bin/su
Finally I realised I had given /xbin/su the incorrect permissions so ammended them to :
abd shell
[email protected]:/ # CHMOD 4755 /system/xbin/su
[email protected]:/ # CHMOD 4755 /system/bin/su
The reason why I am writing exactly what I did is so I myself don't forget anything and also to show others how to do stuff should I be doing it correctly!? I wasn't sure if the su needed to go into xbin or bin so I put it into both directories and thus I can remove which ever one is incorrect once I get a reply from somebody!
Here's my current log from Root Checker Pro - I shall not be doing anything else without further assistance.
Root Access is not properly configured or was not granted.
Super User Application Status:
Superuser application - version 3.0.2 - is installed!
SuperSU application - is NOT installed.
System File Properties for Root Access:
Standard Location
Check Command: ls -l /system/bin/su:
Result: -rwsr-xr-x root root 22140 2008-02-29 02:33 su
Analysis: Setuid attribute is present and root user ownership is present. Root access is correctly configured for this file! Executing this file can grant root access!
Standard Location
Check Command: ls -l /system/xbin/su:
Result: -rwsr-xr-x root root 22140 2008-02-29 02:33 su
Analysis: Setuid attribute is present and root user ownership is present. Root access is correctly configured for this file! Executing this file can grant root access!
Alternative Location
Check Command: ls -l /sbin/su:
Result: /sbin/su: Permission denied
Analysis: File system permissions restricted and denied access.
Alternative Location
Check Command: ls -l /system/xbin/sudo:
Result: /system/xbin/sudo: No such file or directory
Analysis: File /system/xbin/sudo does not exist.
Root User ID and Group ID Status:
SU binary not found or not operating properly
System Environment PATH: /sbin /vendor/bin /system/sbin /system/bin /system/xbin
ADB Shell Default User:
ADB shell setting for standard access, stored in default.prop, is configured as: root user - ro.secure=0
Results provided on your K47/C9_89 device by Root Checker Pro version 1.3.4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SpongeR0b said:
To my surprise, I bit the bullet today and reset my phone to stock defaults..
..unfortunately even this still did not fix the incomplete root
Please help!
EDIT : I've been tinkering again.. Here's what I understand (and what I've done)
System\bin\ - Kinda not the most important place to store a file relating to an installed .apk's
System\xbin\ - The more important place (kinda like the System32 directory) relaing to installed .apk's
System\app\ - The directory where the .apk file's themselves live (kinda like Program Files\xxx Application)
Well I noticed I had an .apk in apps called root_Superuser.apk and this was present even after un-rooting my phone.
I removed this file, using these commands :
adb remount
adb pull /system/app/root_Superuser.apk
Seemingly this didn't remove the file, so then I tried :
adb remount
abd shell rm -f /system/app/root_Superuser.apk
After a quick reboot this had indeed removed Superuser, then I reused the SRS Tool to re-root.
Then I read that SU 3.0.2 was a safer bet.. (although it was a post from 2011 - attached)
So I downloaded that and proceeded to push the superuser.apk and su files into their correct places (as below)
adb remount
adb push superuser.apk /system/app/
adb push su /system/xbin/
adb push su /system/bin/
After the files were correctly in place I needed to set the correct file permissions, I did this as follows :
abd shell
[email protected]:/ # CHMOD 644 /system/app/superuser.apk
[email protected]:/ # CHMOD 777 /system/xbin/su
[email protected]:/ # CHMOD 777 /system/bin/su
Finally I realised I had given /xbin/su the incorrect permissions so ammended them to :
abd shell
[email protected]:/ # CHMOD 4755 /system/xbin/su
[email protected]:/ # CHMOD 4755 /system/bin/su
The reason why I am writing exactly what I did is so I myself don't forget anything and also to show others how to do stuff should I be doing it correctly!? I wasn't sure if the su needed to go into xbin or bin so I put it into both directories and thus I can remove which ever one is incorrect once I get a reply from somebody!
Here's my current log from Root Checker Pro - I shall not be doing anything else without further assistance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great to see the Root Checker apps being used! Given you posted a link back to this thread in the Root Checker thread I'm posting my reply here.
The route I usually take and recommend, which does all of those steps you've performed, such as copying files and setting the correct permissions, is to load an "official" .zip file from the custom recovery.
If you have a custom recovery, I'd recommend loading SuperSU.zip, which has worked very well for me on my devices: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1538053
From the XDA post, there is a link to the .zip file that can be downloaded and loaded in the custom recovery: http://download.chainfire.eu/supersu
If you don't have a custom recovery, I think most of the steps you've taken are correct, but based on the Root Checker Pro output I'd be concerned that the Superuser.apk file you installed and the su binary aren't communicating and might be out of sync. This can be caused by many reasons but the solution is to make sure you installed a matching .apk and su binary.
Hope that helps and good luck!
joeykrim said:
Great to see the Root Checker apps being used! Given you posted a link back to this thread in the Root Checker thread I'm posting my reply here.
The route I usually take and recommend, which does all of those steps you've performed, such as copying files and setting the correct permissions, is to load an "official" .zip file from the custom recovery.
If you have a custom recovery, I'd recommend loading SuperSU.zip, which has worked very well for me on my devices: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1538053
From the XDA post, there is a link to the .zip file that can be downloaded and loaded in the custom recovery: http://download.chainfire.eu/supersu
If you don't have a custom recovery, I think most of the steps you've taken are correct, but based on the Root Checker Pro output I'd be concerned that the Superuser.apk file you installed and the su binary aren't communicating and might be out of sync. This can be caused by many reasons but the solution is to make sure you installed a matching .apk and su binary.
Hope that helps and good luck!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your reply JoeyKrim, unfortunately I don't think a custom recovery is available for this phone at present? I've had SuperSu on my device and to be honest not a great deal worked using it. I've also had both CWM / TWRP installed on the phone and both of them cannot find a suitable ROM to implement. I guess because of the phone being fairly new and a knock off doesn't exactly help me! :cyclops:
I will re-root my device and if that isn't successful manually try to match both superuser.apk and su binary with yet another version of superuser!
EDIT :
Here's what I've tried this morning (unfortunately now I have ran out of time and must get ready for college)
adb remount
adb push Superuser.apk /system/app/
adb push su /system/xbin/
adb push su /system/bin/
adb shell
[email protected]:/ # CHMOD 644 /system/app/Superuser.apk
[email protected]:/ # CHMOD 4755 /system/xbin/su
[email protected]:/ # CHMOD 4755 /system/bin/su
Superuser available to download from http://hosted.androidsu.com/superuser/
Using: su-3.0.1-d-signed.rar I get Superuser v3.0.1 (36), Su binary vnull (legacy)
su-3.0.1-efgh-signed.zip I get Superuser v3.0.1 (36), Su binary vnull (legacy)
Unsure of differences between d & efgh versions? Moved onto next version..
su-3.0.2-efgh-signed.zip I get Superuser v3.0.2 (37), Su binary vnull (legacy)
Renamed ([email protected]:/ # mv Superuser.apk root_Superuser.apk) seemingly no difference?
I was wondering if root allowed apps were renamed as root_appName.apk - I've left the file
name as this (i.e. Superuser.apk is NOT in my system/app/ directory and yet Superuser still
runs fine???)
Superuser-3.0.6-efgh-signed (Only binary updated) v3.0.2 (37), Su binary vnull (legacy)
su-bin-3.0.3.2-efghi-signed.zip Superuser v3.0.2 (37), Su binary vnull (legacy)
Isn't Su binary 3.0.3.2 the more up to date binary??? According my my Superuser's self update
it is?
Trying this release? - Also copied Superuser.apk to root_Superuser.apk as well this time..
Superuser-3.1-arm-signed Unable to check the versions.. different menu
Additionally myt Root Explorer (root_Root explorer.apk) now cannot gain root access which
is the first time this has EVERY occured
Superuser-3.1.1-x86-signed Unable to check the versions.. different menu
OK, so I know for sure that 3.1 is a more recent version of Superuser than I have ever had on
my phone, and of course root explorer doesn't now work, so trying an older version..
Superuser-3.0.7-efghi-signed.zip Superuser v3.0.7(41), Su binary v3.1
Again.. Root explorer no longer working.. tried deleting root_Superuser.apk
(adb shell rm -f /system/app/root_Superuser.apk)
Hasn't seemed to do anything different.. Removing all SuperUser files, ran out of time to
experiment with. Annoyed that now even my Root Explorer isn't working, I seem to be going
backwards and not forwards!!
After un-rooting (using SRSRoot) I once again have access to my Root Explorer??? Weird.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
O.K, I'm ready for step by step instructions, anybody know how to help me please?
EDIT :
Thanks to tijsh111 for providing a working root solution to my problem..
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2219062&nocache=1

Debugging busybox

Hi, I'd like to ask a general question about busybox. I've added busybox binary into ramdisk root directory of boot.img. I've set busybox binary permissions to 0777 in init.rc, in order to be sure not getting any denied permissions issues.
I've put an exec command into init.rc for using busybox cp and it worked because it really made a copy of default.prop in ramdisk root directory. I've also put a start service line into init.rc That service is essentially a busybox sh call for launching a shell script. Unfortunately, it seems shell script is not executed because some cp and echo commands which I put inside it have not effects.
Looking for around the www, it looked like redirection ('>', '>>', ...) is not prohibited by busybox. So, i've also tried to redirect
command output to a file, but file was not created.
So, how could I debug busybox? Any ideas?

[MOD] [Stratos/Pace] Universal init.d Enabler!

What is init.d?
init.d is a folder placed in /system/etc wich has been legendary used since the old android times to run scripts at boot. I've decided to make this simple script becouse lots of my users on my AmazBoost MOD thread were asking how they can enable init.d on stock ROM or simply on an unsupported ROM. It's easy to run and doesn't require any kind of coding skills!
What you need
- AmazFit Stratos/Pace
- Rooted ROM
How to install
1) Download the mod zip from download link and unzip it
2) Connect the wath to the PC
3) Place the enable.sh file inside your adb folder and open there a command prompt (or terminal for Mac OS/linux) then type the following codes:
Code:
adb root
adb push enable.sh /sdcard/
adb shell sh /sdcard/enable.sh
4) Done!
5) You NEED to reinstall the mod running the installer after every ROM update!
Changelog
First release!
Download and enjoy!
https://goo.gl/HYqEZt
If my work was useful always press thanks!​
There is a typo in the script:
touch /system/ect/install-recovery.sh
chmod 755 /system/etc/install-recovery.sh
chown 0:2000 /system/ect/install-recovery.sh
should be
Code:
touch /system/etc/install-recovery.sh
chmod 755 /system/etc/install-recovery.sh
chown 0:2000 /system/etc/install-recovery.sh
jprelay said:
There is a typo in the script:
touch /system/ect/install-recovery.sh
should be
Code:
touch /system/etc/install-recovery.sh
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ooops didn't check it perfectly just used a Compiler to see if there were some syntax errors, thanks I'll updating the file now!
Inviato dal mio G8141 utilizzando Tapatalk
Script name and command name don't match either, enabler.sh
I think that I found a solution..I wish is helpful !
1) First of all you need to have unlock bootloader and then run the temporary root
(check in "PERMANENT INSTALL" description)
AFTER ROOTING LETS GO FOR UNIT SUPPORT!
I used the init.d support through terminal emulator
2) Download the term-init.sh v3 .
3) Connect the watch to your PC.
4) Place the term-init.sh file inside your adb folder and open the command prompt.. then type the following codes:
(if adb shell or adb root not working, try to disconnect and connect your watch )
Code:
adb root
adb push term-init.sh /sdcard/
(or you can drag and drop it in your sdcard)
adb shell sh /sdcard/ term-init.sh
5) After that go and run the installer.bat file from Amazboost folder!
6) Done!​
I tried this tools but i have error
Code:
+ $'\r'
: not foundble.sh[12]:
/sdcard/enable.sh[13]: syntax error: 'if' unmatched
tminhnhat said:
I tried this tools but i have error
Code:
+ $'\r'
: not foundble.sh[12]:
/sdcard/enable.sh[13]: syntax error: 'if' unmatched
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here too, the OP seems to have been making a lot of mistakes in his scripts
How is the init.d supposed to be enabled?
Hi, i want to enable AmazBoost so i came to this post to enable init.d but i lost, i dont understand what i need to do, when i follow the instructions i get this error.
########################################################
# #
# AmazFit universal init.d enabler by @AmazDev #
# #
########################################################
Mounting system...
Usage: mount [-r] [-w] [-o options] [-t type] device directory
: not foundbler.sh[12]:
/sdcard/enabler.sh[13]: syntax error: 'if' unmatched
I have Stratos 2 A1619
I have a Stock ROM 2.3.6.0 Unlocked
Thanks
---------- Post added at 05:20 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:04 PM ----------
Hi, i tried with the other instructions but again i have a error:
C:\Program Files (x86)\Minimal ADB and Fastboot>adb shell sh /sdcard/term-init.sh
Init.d Enabler by Ryuinferno @ XDA
Script NOT running as root!
Superuser access not granted!
Please type 'su' first before running this script...
C:\Program Files (x86)\Minimal ADB and Fastboot>su
'su' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
kostasntamas said:
I think that I found a solution..I wish is helpful !
1) First of all you need to have unlock bootloader and then run the temporary root
(check in "PERMANENT INSTALL" description)
AFTER ROOTING LETS GO FOR UNIT SUPPORT!
I used the init.d support through terminal emulator
2) Download the term-init.sh v3 .
3) Connect the watch to your PC.
4) Place the term-init.sh file inside your adb folder and open the command prompt.. then type the following codes:
(if adb shell or adb root not working, try to disconnect and connect your watch )
Code:
adb root
adb push term-init.sh /sdcard/
(or you can drag and drop it in your sdcard)
adb shell sh /sdcard/ term-init.sh
5) After that go and run the installer.bat file from Amazboost folder!
6) Done!​
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hi mate, do you modify the term-init.sh?
may i know which version of busybox that you are using?
currently im using the busybox from here: https://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=78031249&postcount=107
and when i try to install term-init.sh, i encountered below error:
Code:
grep applet NOT FOUND!
run-parts applet NOT FOUND!
Required applets are NOT FOUND!
Please reinstall busybox!
illkid69 said:
hi mate, do you modify the term-init.sh?
may i know which version of busybox that you are using?
currently im using the busybox from here: https://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=78031249&postcount=107
and when i try to install term-init.sh, i encountered below error:
Code:
grep applet NOT FOUND!
run-parts applet NOT FOUND!
Required applets are NOT FOUND!
Please reinstall busybox!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i have same problem do u find any solution?
Is anybody enable init.d on stock fw?
Hi,
I'm trying to install the Amazboost tweaks on my rooted Stratos (A1619) with Global FW (2.3.10.5) but I suspect that the installation of the tweaks via busybox is not running correctly. I have followed precisely the procedures with success but there is no log in the AmazBoost/LOGS folder after the reboot.
I have installed the last version of busybox (V1.29.3 for MIPS) in both /system/bin and /system/xbin but no log at all.
Some posts said that init.d is not working with stock fw.
Is that true?
Is anybody can help me to check if init.d can be enabled on my rooted Stratos (A1619) with Global FW (2.3.10.5)? And how can we verify that it works?
Thanks
Hi,
I'm still trying to understand why init.d is not running on my Stratos (A1619) with Global FW (2.3.10.5).
The init.d script refers to the "run-parts" file located in the /system/xbin/ directory.
But run-parts is not present.
I have found one file coming from the xperia x10 forum but it is not working on the Stratos: /system/xbin/run-parts: not executable: 32-bit ELF file
Is somebody could provide me this run-parts file compliant with the Stratos? (or help me to understand why the amazboost tweaks are not correctly installed)

Categories

Resources