Related
Demonizing Kernelz​
These are the first Kernels I have ever built so go easy on me. There are two versions AOSP GB and AOSP ICS. Currently there is no major modifications, as I get more experience I will start posting change logs and upload source code. For now we will keep all discussion in the thread. Please report any problems, or concerns. As of now I will only be uploading the zImage.
GB Beta: GB KERNEL
ICS Sense Beta: See Scroslers ROM ICS Kernel
ICS AOSP ALPHA: ALPHA
ICS ALPHA PROBLEMS: Well as with all alpha status kernels, I would not recommend daily use. Its a work in progress! Stay Posted for updates.
NO DATA
NO WIFI
NO ADB
NO USB MOUNTING
Awesome dude, you're the first to have an AOSP kernel for us. To bad we don't have a rom for it, but hey, progress is progress
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA App
yeah been up all night messing with it and finally got it to compile. Well right now I'm working on porting an ICS ROM so we shall see how it goes.
Hit up droid vicious, he has an MIUI port he could test with
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk
antispiral said:
.............
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You'll be thanking me when you have ICS on your Rezound.
Personally can't wait to see some AOSP on this phone.
This is awesome. I have been getting discouraged by not having any updates on AOSP progress lately.
Is it an ICS kernel or gingerbread?
I would be ecstatic with a CM7 port right now.
x3demond3x said:
Ok so iI built a KANG of the Tiamat AOSP Kernel for the Rezound. I am taking no credit. All credit goes to TIAMAT.
I am not sure this works, again this is AOSP so it has to be tested with an AOSP Port. If anyone has one please contact me for testing.
Thank You
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can I get a link? I have several aosp ports in the works
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk
A link would be nice, if you believe its presentable in your opinion
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA App
please post
please! post that stuff sos we can get some NON-Sense roms flowing!!!
I have been working on my own CM7 port so tonight I'll throw this in and see what happens
Been waiting for an AOSP kernel. I have been trying to compile my own but still don't know what I'm doing yet...
a.mcdear said:
I have been working on my own CM7 port so tonight I'll throw this in and see what happens
Been waiting for an AOSP kernel. I have been trying to compile my own but still don't know what I'm doing yet...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If anyone has an AOSP, CM7 or (preferably) a CM9 ROM built and wants a tester for the ROM/kernel combination send me a PM with the info/links.
Deathbyfugu said:
If anyone has an AOSP, CM7 or (preferably) a CM9 ROM built and wants a tester for the ROM/kernel combination send me a PM with the info/links.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I, like countless others, would also be willing to test, I'm sure.... Thanks for all the work!
FYI The only changes that need to be made for aosp are a few things for the touchscreen and to use the aosp WiFi module instead of htcs. Theres nothing that that should have prevented someone from booting aosp with the stock kernel... They just wouldn't have touch initially, which as a five minute fix. I also wouldn't use this kernel as the base for an aosp build since its highly modified and it will be difficult to separate kernel issues from ROM issues. I'll build a completely stock kernel with just the aosp changes later, if that's what's been holding everyone up.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA App
I just want an aosp rom idc who makes the kernel!
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA App
I check 20 times a day for an aosp Rom. Thanks Chad!!
chad0989 said:
FYI The only changes that need to be made for aosp are a few things for the touchscreen and to use the aosp WiFi module instead of htcs. Theres nothing that that should have prevented someone from booting aosp with the stock kernel... They just wouldn't have touch initially, which as a five minute fix. I also wouldn't use this kernel as the base for an aosp build since its highly modified and it will be difficult to separate kernel issues from ROM issues. I'll build a completely stock kernel with just the aosp changes later, if that's what's been holding everyone up.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA App
chad0989 said:
FYI The only changes that need to be made for aosp are a few things for the touchscreen and to use the aosp WiFi module instead of htcs. Theres nothing that that should have prevented someone from booting aosp with the stock kernel... They just wouldn't have touch initially, which as a five minute fix. I also wouldn't use this kernel as the base for an aosp build since its highly modified and it will be difficult to separate kernel issues from ROM issues. I'll build a completely stock kernel with just the aosp changes later, if that's what's been holding everyone up.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Got this phone JUST YESTERDAY in the hopes that AOSP would follow shortly, so all of this news is going to give me an Androrgasm, srsly
chad0989 said:
FYI The only changes that need to be made for aosp are a few things for the touchscreen and to use the aosp WiFi module instead of htcs. Theres nothing that that should have prevented someone from booting aosp with the stock kernel... They just wouldn't have touch initially, which as a five minute fix. I also wouldn't use this kernel as the base for an aosp build since its highly modified and it will be difficult to separate kernel issues from ROM issues. I'll build a completely stock kernel with just the aosp changes later, if that's what's been holding everyone up.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From the changes I made, it looked to me as if it was completely stock with AOSP changes. Tiamat hasn't made this official so there is very few or no modifications. But man I wish I would of asked! This thing was a pain!
x3demond3x said:
From the changes I made, it looked to me as if it was completely stock with AOSP changes. Tiamat hasn't made this official so there is very few or no modifications. But man I wish I would of asked! This thing was a pain!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where did you pull the source from? You said Tiamat so I assumed you used their 8x60 Tiamat source as the base.
http://git.tiamat-dev.com/8x60/htc-kernel-msm8x60/
If you used the vigor branch it looks like they haven't done anything at all to it yet so it may just be fine. But in that case I would remove Tiamat kang from the title since you didn't kang anything from them if you made all the changes yourself... Haha.
Edit, I see where you pulled from, it looks like they started a new branch:
http://git.tiamat-dev.com/8x60/tiamat-kernel
It may or may not work, it doesn't look like they've made too many changes to it but its using the ruby kernel as the base with vigor files added to it, I still say it would be best to use the kernel straight from htc with just the changes for AOSP added.
Well, all the Sense 4 ROMs drain my battery like its nobody's business, and personally I really don't seem to like Sense anymore. I know that newtoroot came out with an AOSP rom awhile back in like February, but has anyone been working on one since? And I know people "claim" to have AOSP roms but all of them are still using sense's SystemUI, so im looking for a FULL AOSP rom. thanks to anyone who can help.
zZDave_Stud said:
Well, all the Sense 4 ROMs drain my battery like its nobody's business, and personally I really don't seem to like Sense anymore. I know that newtoroot came out with an AOSP rom awhile back in like February, but has anyone been working on one since? And I know people "claim" to have AOSP roms but all of them are still using sense's SystemUI, so im looking for a FULL AOSP rom. thanks to anyone who can help.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since this is a pretty touchy subject... I'll handle it.
We do not have full functioning AOSP roms. The rezound has very difficult tech to reverse engineer. The AOSP roms that do exist all have no data, text, or call capability. Not even wifi. A few have tried to work on getting AOSP over but either stopped in the hopes that the ICS OTA stuff will help or they just dumped the rezound completely. I just hope you don't get flamed.
What hurts the rezound, was that everyone was expecting to get it and then immediately switch to ICS so the gingerbread development lacked a lot. And leaks don't really help us at all as far as ICS goes. Here we are 8 months after the debut of ICS and we are still left out in the cold.
There are a few people still trying to make AOSP happen, but for now, senseless is as close as you'll get.
bukithd said:
Since this is a pretty touchy subject... I'll handle it.
We do not have full functioning AOSP roms. The rezound has very difficult tech to reverse engineer. The AOSP roms that do exist all have no data, text, or call capability. Not even wifi. A few have tried to work on getting AOSP over but either stopped in the hopes that the ICS OTA stuff will help or they just dumped the rezound completely. I just hope you don't get flamed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not gonna get flamed. But newtoroots AOSP Rom was so close to perfect, ril worked, everything ran perfectly, except for a few bugs here and there. I would love if some awesome dev out there would take that Rom, fix it up, and put it on the forums. That's my two cents. Thanks for the feedback man.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
zZDave_Stud said:
I'm not gonna get flamed. But newtoroots AOSP Rom was so close to perfect, ril worked, everything ran perfectly, except for a few bugs here and there. I would love if some awesome dev out there would take that Rom, fix it up, and put it on the forums. That's my two cents. Thanks for the feedback man.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That wasn't aosp brohan. I reiterate, no aosp, only SENSELESS
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
I know but it actually used an AOSP SystemUI which is all that I really want. I can post pics if necessary (though it'll be hard on my phone lol)
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Let's not flame this guy. Let's turn this into a productive thread about AOSP even though we have scattered comments about AOSP/AOKP/CM in random threads.
Chad is working on RIL issues in his upcoming kernel. Chad is an extremely busy student so don't expect anything soon although he has gotten calls/sms/1x data working.
We really don't have an updated version of CM9 or AOKP but since we don't have data for them yet, there is no reason to make a ROM bot for them automatically compiling roms nightly.
OK now let's get productive. We have GB source. I don't understand why we don't have a CM7 rom yet. Well, I didn't understand why until I tried do compile/port one myself. I am not an expert at compiling from source especially when our device isn't officially supported but my port won't boot past the splash screen. I am thinking about putting the port up in the dev section and turning it into a community project. I have tried the Demonizing AOSP kernel and I have compiled multiple CM7 kernels from source but still no booting.
I know CM7 is GB based but it's better than nothing at least until we get ICS source.
Quada said:
Let's not flame this guy. Let's turn this into a productive thread about AOSP even though we have scattered comments about AOSP/AOKP/CM in random threads.
Chad is working on RIL issues in his upcoming kernel. Chad is an extremely busy student so don't expect anything soon although he has gotten calls/sms/1x data working.
We really don't have an updated version of CM9 or AOKP but since we don't have data for them yet, there is no reason to make a ROM bot for them automatically compiling roms nightly.
OK now let's get productive. We have GB source. I don't understand why we don't have a CM7 rom yet. Well, I didn't understand why until I tried do compile/port one myself. I am not an expert at compiling from source especially when our device isn't officially supported but my port won't boot past the splash screen. I am thinking about putting the port up in the dev section and turning it into a community project. I have tried the Demonizing AOSP kernel and I have compiled multiple CM7 kernels from source but still no booting.
I know CM7 is GB based but it's better than nothing at least until we get ICS source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fix RIL would still be necessary for CM7 as it is for CM9. So given our most recent leaks/RUUs, makes since to focus on one vs. The other... Gingerbread is ooooooold
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
Quada said:
Let's not flame this guy. Let's turn this into a productive thread about AOSP even though we have scattered comments about AOSP/AOKP/CM in random threads.
Chad is working on RIL issues in his upcoming kernel. Chad is an extremely busy student so don't expect anything soon although he has gotten calls/sms/1x data working.
We really don't have an updated version of CM9 or AOKP but since we don't have data for them yet, there is no reason to make a ROM bot for them automatically compiling roms nightly.
OK now let's get productive. We have GB source. I don't understand why we don't have a CM7 rom yet. Well, I didn't understand why until I tried do compile/port one myself. I am not an expert at compiling from source especially when our device isn't officially supported but my port won't boot past the splash screen. I am thinking about putting the port up in the dev section and turning it into a community project. I have tried the Demonizing AOSP kernel and I have compiled multiple CM7 kernels from source but still no booting.
I know CM7 is GB based but it's better than nothing at least until we get ICS source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the feedback man. And goodluck on your AOSP GB Rom man. And one quick question, (hope I don't sound like a noon) umm, who exactly is chad?
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Quada said:
Let's not flame this guy. Let's turn this into a productive thread about AOSP even though we have scattered comments about AOSP/AOKP/CM in random threads.
Chad is working on RIL issues in his upcoming kernel. Chad is an extremely busy student so don't expect anything soon although he has gotten calls/sms/1x data working.
We really don't have an updated version of CM9 or AOKP but since we don't have data for them yet, there is no reason to make a ROM bot for them automatically compiling roms nightly.
OK now let's get productive. We have GB source. I don't understand why we don't have a CM7 rom yet. Well, I didn't understand why until I tried do compile/port one myself. I am not an expert at compiling from source especially when our device isn't officially supported but my port won't boot past the splash screen. I am thinking about putting the port up in the dev section and turning it into a community project. I have tried the Demonizing AOSP kernel and I have compiled multiple CM7 kernels from source but still no booting.
I know CM7 is GB based but it's better than nothing at least until we get ICS source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's interesting. I always just assumed everyone was so focused on ICS/CM9 that they just never bothered with CM7. I would probably use CM7 over our current crop of ICS choices to be honest.
zZDave_Stud said:
Thanks for the feedback man. And goodluck on your AOSP GB Rom man. And one quick question, (hope I don't sound like a noon) umm, who exactly is chad?
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1437198&page=70 <<<< chad. Try to refrain from bugging him though, like I said, he is very busy.
fo0you said:
Fix RIL would still be necessary for CM7 as it is for CM9. So given our most recent leaks/RUUs, makes since to focus on one vs. The other... Gingerbread is ooooooold
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes but it would be much much easier to fix because we has source. Chad even said that 99% of the issues is just rearranging libraries in the kernel.
dogswind said:
That's interesting. I always just assumed everyone was so focused on ICS/CM9 that they just never bothered with CM7. I would probably use CM7 over our current crop of ICS choices to be honest.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would use CM7 over ICS sense as well. I believe a lot of users on here would feel the same.
Quada said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1437198&page=70 <<<< chad. Try to refrain from bugging him though, like I said, he is very busy.
Yes but it would be much much easier to fix because we has source. Chad even said that 99% of the issues is just rearranging libraries in the kernel.
I would use CM7 over ICS sense as well. I believe a lot of users on here would feel the same.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright thanks for letting me know who he was. So now, basically, Chads upcoming kernel will make all current AOSP roms a daily driver (with ril working)? Please tell me if this is incorrect. If its not then I'm actually kind of excited!
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Quada said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1437198&page=70 <<<< chad. Try to refrain from bugging him though, like I said, he is very busy.
Yes but it would be much much easier to fix because we has source. Chad even said that 99% of the issues is just rearranging libraries in the kernel.
I would use CM7 over ICS sense as well. I believe a lot of users on here would feel the same.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yesss I'd love to have a cm7 . I actually just downgraded back to gb firmware
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
zZDave_Stud said:
Alright thanks for letting me know who he was. So now, basically, Chads upcoming kernel will make all current AOSP roms a daily driver (with ril working)? Please tell me if this is incorrect. If its not then I'm actually kind of excited!
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no guarantee of him getting 3g/4g data working, but if he does then ICS AOSP roms will become a reality.
Quada said:
There is no guarantee of him getting 3g/4g data working, but if he does then ICS AOSP roms will become a reality.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright awesome, thanks for the replies everyone, I can't wait for chad's kernel. And I believe that atm I would use CM7 over the assortment of ics roms we have as well.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
zZDave_Stud said:
Alright thanks for letting me know who he was. So now, basically, Chads upcoming kernel will make all current AOSP roms a daily driver (with ril working)? Please tell me if this is incorrect. If its not then I'm actually kind of excited!
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't hold my breath. Bottom line is that there has been no updates released to the "public" in a couple of months, just word of mouth that they have it working, except for a few bugs.
Quada said:
Let's not flame this guy. Let's turn this into a productive thread about AOSP even though we have scattered comments about AOSP/AOKP/CM in random threads.
Chad is working on RIL issues in his upcoming kernel. Chad is an extremely busy student so don't expect anything soon although he has gotten calls/sms/1x data working.
We really don't have an updated version of CM9 or AOKP but since we don't have data for them yet, there is no reason to make a ROM bot for them automatically compiling roms nightly.
OK now let's get productive. We have GB source. I don't understand why we don't have a CM7 rom yet. Well, I didn't understand why until I tried do compile/port one myself. I am not an expert at compiling from source especially when our device isn't officially supported but my port won't boot past the splash screen. I am thinking about putting the port up in the dev section and turning it into a community project. I have tried the Demonizing AOSP kernel and I have compiled multiple CM7 kernels from source but still no booting.
I know CM7 is GB based but it's better than nothing at least until we get ICS source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think making it a community rom is a pretty good idea.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
zZDave_Stud said:
I know but it actually used an AOSP SystemUI which is all that I really want. I can post pics if necessary (though it'll be hard on my phone lol)
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If that's all you really need then use Slim or CleanRom DE. Slim especially has pretty much all of Sense stripped away either is worlds better for battery life.
Chad is doing what protekk couldnt do.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
Newt is currently working on aokp. Says he has calls and texts working so far and next step is data.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
Hopefully this is the right section for a question like this...
I'm currently running stock ROM, s-off using Dirty Racun method. I'd like to switch up to a custom mod because I'm frustrated by the lack of customization on stock. I'd like to know which of the 2 ROMs is most like stock and basically, which you prefer and why. Not looking to start a war thread here so keep it civil, options more than welcome though. I'd like to make use of the following features so if one doesn't have them, please let me know:
Wake-on-volume
Overclock
Thanks in advance for your input
Spider96 said:
Hopefully this is the right section for a question like this...
I'm currently running stock ROM, s-off using Dirty Racun method. I'd like to switch up to a custom mod because I'm frustrated by the lack of customization on stock. I'd like to know which of the 2 ROMs is most like stock and basically, which you prefer and why. Not looking to start a war thread here so keep it civil, options more than welcome though. I'd like to make use of the following features so if one doesn't have them, please let me know:
Wake-on-volume
Overclock
Thanks in advance for your input
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well, then you should go with the viper, the wake on volume was in cm10.1, but buggy so they removed it
EDIT: actually the wake on volume is working on cm 10.1 now in the latest unofficial release 0406
And if that wasn't a deal breaker would you still make that recommendation?
Sent from my ADR6410LVW using xda premium
Spider96 said:
And if that wasn't a deal breaker would you still make that recommendation?
Sent from my ADR6410LVW using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well i'm running cm, but i like both, i just kinda switch back and forth, run one for awhile then the other when i want a change,both are good roms
Aosp all day for me hands down
I love sense personally but always love to try new flavors of android, overclock is done with both, by modules and kernel on cm10 and by module on sense, however a sense kernel release will take place next week by me
And about wake on volume, if it is necessary, use viper
Sent from my TF300T using xda app-developers app
Viper is awesome but I don't know how anyone can prefer a sense based ROM over CM...
Sent from my Incredible 4G LTE using xda app-developers app
I personally like CM right now, though both are excellent ROMs in my opinion. I just prefer the overall "feel" of CM and I love a more stock experience...I find Sense a waste of resources that could better be placed elsewhere. though you can opt out of it with Viper. That being said, I would give them both a try and see which one suits you better! They are both amazing, it's really just a matter of preference...
Spider96 said:
Hopefully this is the right section for a question like this...
I'm currently running stock ROM, s-off using Dirty Racun method. I'd like to switch up to a custom mod because I'm frustrated by the lack of customization on stock. I'd like to know which of the 2 ROMs is most like stock and basically, which you prefer and why. Not looking to start a war thread here so keep it civil, options more than welcome though. I'd like to make use of the following features so if one doesn't have them, please let me know:
Wake-on-volume
Overclock
Thanks in advance for your input
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if you prefer aosp: cm
if your prefer sense: viper
that about sums it up
Make a NAND of both and enjoy the best of both worlds. Problem solved :beer:
I'm using viperLTE with infernal kernel and I get great results
Sent from my ADR6410LVW using xda app-developers app
I'm using the same exact setup and I love it too...
Sent from my ADR6410LVW using xda premium
been running viper forever... gonna have to break down and install the inferal kernel at some point soon... just need to download and flash it right?
j13smiley said:
been running viper forever... gonna have to break down and install the inferal kernel at some point soon... just need to download and flash it right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes if you are s off
Yeah, Jose makes it easy like that
Sent from my ADR6410LVW using xda premium
switching back and forth
What are best practices for switching back and forth between CM10 and Viper? NAND backups, but what about Titanium? Can that be used to preserve SMS messages? Or is it too unreliable to do titanium backups between the different types of ROMs? Thanks for your input.
-Drew
Spider96 said:
Yeah, Jose makes it easy like that
Sent from my ADR6410LVW using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you shouldn't have a problem with titanium between the 2 roms just make sure you fix app permissions
PACman, paranoid kicks ass
I have reached that point where I no longer care for the benchmarks and stuff. I don't use my phone for intense gaming or app usage anymore so as long as the ROM is smooth, can do some multitasking briskly and has no to little bugs, I am ok.
Currently, my favorite is CM10.1.2 because it can do gapless playback in Google Music and I am a sucker for it! I am a fan of PAC-rom too but I am not sure if it is stable for our phone.
Go for CM10.1.2 with a 3.0 kernel for the best of both worlds - stability and the latest Android (mdm series CM 10 is great).
Personally I prefer the CyanogenMod ROMs (more official to get deeper) because you can customize the hell out of them. They do have the overclocking you are looking for, and yes, in one of the recent updates, they put in wake-vol-buttons. I like it because the themes are just awesome and the support is excellent. Nightly updates and nightly fixes (for the most part). There are somethings that I would like CyanogenMod to fix such as the external SD card usb mass storage not mounting on PC. That is a major drag. That is the only thing that I can think of right now that I hate about CyanogenMod. Hope this review on it helps!
Alright, I am a kernel dev from the Xperia Z forums. @Thraxzzz wanted me to develop a custom stock kernel for the ultra. Mind you, I don't have the device myself, but with a little help from beta testers, I could probably develop one.
But before that, I would like to how many would actually use one, if I bring out a build.
Here's my kernel for the Z.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2409003
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
EDIT: Remember, to use a custom kernel, you'll NEED to unlock your bootloader.
If the kernel would support great overclocking and underclocking capabilities plus swapfile memory support, i would definitely go for it!!
Typed along the gumline
capitansid said:
If the kernel would support great overclocking and underclocking capabilities plus swapfile memory support, i would definitely go for it!!
Typed along the gumline
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course, all that would be included. But I need many testers. :good:
I use a custom kernel for the ability overclock and undervolt. The latter is most important to me in order to save power and make the device run cooler (it really helps on the Z). I am using your kernel on the Z too, btw.
E90 Commie said:
I use a custom kernel for the ability overclock and undervolt. The latter is most important to me in order to save power and make the device run cooler (it really helps on the Z). I am using your kernel on the Z too, btw.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Excellent. Alright, I'll get to work. And glad to know you're using my kernel
Sent from my C6603
alnikki25k said:
Alright, I am a kernel dev from the Xperia Z forums. @Thraxzzz wanted me to develop a custom stock kernel for the ultra. Mind you, I don't have the device myself, but with a little help from beta testers, I could probably develop one.
But before that, I would like to how many would actually use one, if I bring out a build.
Here's my kernel for the Z.
EDIT: Remember, to use a custom kernel, you'll NEED to unlock your bootloader.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I always end up using a custom kernel on all my devices, just for the little tweaks. Overclocking Im not really concerned with, they devices are normally more than fast enough. A little undervolting is sometimes helpful. Some speaker tuning options for the Z Ultra would be nice.
The only thing i need is a kernel for me to enhance the color (gamma) of the display, much like what asus and samsung did to their product lineup.
I would like a kernel that also supports sweep2wake and doubletap2wake, I'm using one on my Nexus 7 (2013), it is great and I love doubletap!
Mucho79 said:
I would like a kernel that also supports sweep2wake and doubletap2wake, I'm using one on my Nexus 7 (2013), it is great and I love doubletap!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
beerope said:
The only thing i need is a kernel for me to enhance the color (gamma) of the display, much like what asus and samsung did to their product lineup.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
baileyjr said:
I always end up using a custom kernel on all my devices, just for the little tweaks. Overclocking Im not really concerned with, they devices are normally more than fast enough. A little undervolting is sometimes helpful. Some speaker tuning options for the Z Ultra would be nice.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright, I could implement most of those features, but obviously need time. Let me get to working on it now. :good:
EDIT: Also, would any of you be willing to help me financially to afford this device? Just a request. I can work without it. But would obviously work better with it.
alnikki25k said:
Alright, I could implement most of those features, but obviously need time. Let me get to working on it now. :good:
EDIT: Also, would any of you be willing to help me financially to afford this device? Just a request. I can work without it. But would obviously work better with it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I could, but honestly I would gladly donate 50 bucks to anybody who could port a stock 4.3 as if it was a Z Ultra Google Play Edition...
I used Siyah on my S3 since it was developed for it, but now I left it behind (together with the dual boot capability) with CM 10.2 and used the CM stock kernel since.
I used it to overclock, undervolt, better the speaker and headphones volumes etc.
Looking forward to trying your future kernel, I have another week to wait for my handset to come yet...
fastest83 said:
I could, but honestly I would gladly donate 50 bucks to anybody who could port a stock 4.3 as if it was a Z Ultra Google Play Edition...
I used Siyah on my S3 since it was developed for it, but now I left it behind (together with the dual boot capability) with CM 10.2 and used the CM stock kernel since.
I used it to overclock, undervolt, better the speaker and headphones volumes etc.
Looking forward to trying your future kernel, I have another week to wait for my handset to come yet...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah, the GPe. I'll look into that too. For now, I have to see what changes MSM8974 brings in for the kernel. Sweet, I'll get to work after I get some sleep lol :good:
Looking forward to see your kernel on our Zu. Just got to look at the Op of your Z thread and it look really good. Hope intelidemand can be use on this CPU.
Sent from my C6802 using Tapatalk 4
Excellent. Thanks for your interest. Expect an initial release soon But you people have to test it for me
alnikki25k said:
Also, would any of you be willing to help me financially to afford this device? Just a request. I can work without it. But would obviously work better with it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Still waiting on my device for the moment, but I always like to make a small donation to the devs working on useful tools. Hopefully many people will see fit to do the same... It soon adds up..
Nice, waiting for this one. Hope you include screen color adjustments. Like the z has.
Sent from my C6833 using xda app-developers app
Please help to provide the custom kernel with undervolting, better the speaker, longlasting battery, and better headphones volumes
pipatl said:
Please help to provide the custom kernel with undervolting, better the speaker, longlasting battery, and better headphones volumes
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure. That would all eventually develop in the kernel
angel.grin said:
Nice, waiting for this one. Hope you include screen color adjustments. Like the z has.
Sent from my C6833 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have to study the panel drivers first. I am sure they all work the same way, but just to be sure.
baileyjr said:
Still waiting on my device for the moment, but I always like to make a small donation to the devs working on useful tools. Hopefully many people will see fit to do the same... It soon adds up..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hope so too. It really is a pain to develop without the device. I mean it's not impossible, but it limits you in so many ways.
Sent from my C6603
Wow,you used my name xD this is the first time i got tagged in post Will wait for the kernel,willing to test it mate
Backed Up TA already
Mistake
Sent from my C6802 using Tapatalk 4
Interesse in it
If doen correctly ill root my device for it
Sent from my C6833 using xda app-developers app
ok so ive been looking around for kernels for both of my devices lgg2 and n5 and ive noticed that theres a kernel with "knock on" but i also saw a sweep to wake and im sure people would donate because it would make the device better so yea, if a kernel developer has time start making a kick as$ kernel ill donate to whoever comes up with it first
cyan pac said:
ok so ive been looking around for kernels for both of my devices lgg2 and n5 and ive noticed that theres a kernel with "knock on" but i also saw a sweep to wake and im sure people would donate because it would make the device better so yea, if a kernel developer has time start making a kick as$ kernel ill donate to whoever comes up with it first
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think a thread is needed for this, but..
Also, there already is a custom kernel..
cyan pac said:
ok so ive been looking around for kernels for both of my devices lgg2 and n5 and ive noticed that theres a kernel with "knock on" but i also saw a sweep to wake and im sure people would donate because it would make the device better so yea, if a kernel developer has time start making a kick as$ kernel ill donate to whoever comes up with it first
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A kernel for Sweep2wake I am also looking:good:
btm fdr said:
I don't think a thread is needed for this, but..
Also, there already is a custom kernel..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i know there are custom kernels like wootevers and idk the others name but i mean like sweep2wake and stuff ive seen it all over n5 but yea i like the idea, but i am not skillled enough to make it/port it, im looking for a feature pack kernel not a overclocked slightly modified one. sorry i had to rant about it
I wouldnt mind seeing more dev for kernel...or roms...but kernel is important.
Dont need kernel for that, install nova and screen on
Sent from my LG-G2 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Are there more kernels out there. Only see Woots custom kernel.
Sent from my LG-D800 using Tapatalk 2
I think S2W can be implemented by @Wootever , his kernel is @faux123 based, (Who make S2W possible for N5), but i don't know if faux make S2W open source, if he make it, we can get it.
jeff5347 said:
Are there more kernels out there. Only see Woots custom kernel.
Sent from my LG-D800 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is another kernel, but this one is for d802, don't know if it works for other versions.
Here is the link http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2525446
I just want a kernel that disables the damn content adaptive brightness.
Sent from my Nexus 7 FHD using Tapatalk 4
I would like some more chicken Kernel Sanders
Sent from my LG G2 using xda app-developers app
Is like a kernel for vs980 that works with malludus
Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk
What do you guys think of maybe ask franco(or other recognized developer) if he can do a kernel for G2 and then do a bounty??
i opened a bounty thread to bring stratosk(semaphore kernel) to LG G2
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2563676