Hi,
I thought you guys with G900H (Exynos variant) might want to try this out.
Stock min freqs (500 and 800MHz):
http://forum.xda-developers.com/devdb/project/dl/?id=7080
Min 200MHz for A7 and A15 clusters - might have better battery life but it will be less smooth... maybe:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/devdb/project/dl/?id=7081
Please let me know which version works better for you and I'll keep those min freqs as default.
Sources:
https://github.com/drakester/SM-G900H_Kernel
I have done a couple of things to improve battery life, but overall it's very minimally modified from stock.
See Github for changelogs and to behold the innards of my laughable attempt at getting a kernel running.
It also has a working implementation of Wolfson Control (thanks to AndreiLux!).
Hopefully I'll have enough time later to implement a robust Synapse-based control for it.
All credits of most things to:
@AndreiLux - A lot of help and guidance implementing Wolfson Control
@halaszk88
@Alberto96
@franciscofranco
@Christopher83 - toolchain
The only thing I have done is try and test applying their work into this device, my knowledge is very limited.
If you really want to donate, donate to them, not to me. It wouldn't exist without their effort.
Flash this under your own risk! It trips Knox counter!
Under no circumstances I'm responsable for any harm to your devices.
I'm not going to add stuff I don't want/need, before you ask for:
5000 governors
5000 i/o schedulers
CPU OC
I might add:
GPU OC
Changelog:
0.2:
Fixed updater script, this caused a silent error on flash.
Note: This kernel is based on NE2 firmware, it most likely will not boot in older versions.
The OP is the most mysterious and hidden part of xda, if you read all the way here you are awesome, congrats!
XDA:DevDB Information
Universal5422 Custom Kernel, Kernel for the Samsung Galaxy S 5
Contributors
drakester09
Kernel Special Features:
Version Information
Status: No Longer Updated
Created 2014-06-18
Last Updated 2014-07-21
Great work mate, always need more devs for G900H.
Will test it out soon.
dude plz build custom rom for our sm-g900H,we waiting for few days... btw Great jon and we ty xD
Στάλθηκε από το SM-G900H μου χρησιμοποιώντας Tapatalk
Airboner said:
dude plz build custom rom for our sm-g900H,we waiting for few days... btw Great jon and we ty xD
Στάλθηκε από το SM-G900H μου χρησιμοποιώντας Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe, someday when I have enough spare time... :silly: Unfortunately there's a lot to learn and very little time.
Thank you finally some development i will try them and get back to you THanks for this )
---------- Post added at 07:09 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:16 PM ----------
what exactly is wolfson contol and how do you use it ??
---------- Post added at 07:27 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:09 PM ----------
I have tried the lower frequency one but I dont see it running at 200 instead still at 500 much I change this manually? Or is it auto scripted/
Tim34 said:
[/COLOR]I have tried the lower frequency one but I dont see it running at 200 instead still at 500 much I change this manually? Or is it auto scripted/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My mistake , I added the wrong boot.img to that zip. I'm uploading a fixed version.
drakester09 said:
My mistake , I added the wrong boot.img to that zip. I'm uploading a fixed version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cool let me know ill try it out ......
Thanks for reporting that, I double checked and found something wrong. A redownload/reflash is advised for everyone.
Updated both zips as the updater-script had an error with the target path, please try them now.
I swear I wasn't testing the placebo effect on you guys. :laugh: Honest mistake.
Didn't notice because I had the image flashed previously using flashify (way faster than going to recovery and flashing).
I only tested that the zips were functional and no errors were reported in recovery. But the error was silently dropped.
drakester09 said:
Thanks for reporting that, I double checked and found something wrong. A redownload/reflash is advised for everyone.
Updated both zips as the updater-script had an error with the target path, please try them now.
I swear I wasn't testing the placebo effect on you guys. :laugh: Honest mistake.
Didn't notice because I had the image flashed previously using flashify (way faster than going to recovery and flashing).
I only tested that the zips were functional and no errors were reported in recovery. But the error was silently dropped.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cool Bro... I am running the lower cpu version and it is very smooth. If the battery turns out to be better this will be a excellent daily kernel. Thank you so much for helping us all out....
Maybe one day you will get free time and make a nice rom for this phone hahaha here is to hoping
Tim34 said:
Cool Bro... I am running the lower cpu version and it is very smooth. If the battery turns out to be better this will be a excellent daily kernel. Thank you so much for helping us all out....
Maybe one day you will get free time and make a nice rom for this phone hahaha here is to hoping
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe....
Please let us know how it works for you. I want to see how both variants behave in different setups (apps, usage).
Thanks a lot.
drakester09 said:
Maybe....
Please let us know how it works for you. I want to see how both variants behave in different setups (apps, usage).
Thanks a lot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure will do so and post later )
Sorry. I'm thinking about whether I should buy a warranted G900H Octa or an exported set G906 with Snapdragon 805. I don't really care about the QHD vs FHD screen though. But from this thread, I want to ask the SoC Exynos 5422 uses the same cluster immigration like Note 3 S4 or the new HMP implementation like Exynos 5260 Hexa? Thanks.
hung2900 said:
Sorry. I'm thinking about whether I should buy a warranted G900H Octa or an exported set G906 with Snapdragon 805. I don't really care about the QHD vs FHD screen though. But from this thread, I want to ask the SoC Exynos 5422 uses the same cluster immigration like Note 3 S4 or the new HMP implementation like Exynos 5260 Hexa? Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same as Hexa, new HMP.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/7811/samsungs-exynos-5422-the-ideal-biglittle-exynos-5-hexa-5260
They actually moved the kernel version to 3.10 to get it supported.
thank you for cauze of your custom kernel,my phone bricked -.- i hope that the stock freq you uploaded its also stock kernel..
pff i try to connect my phone with pc and doesnt recognise my own sd...plz delete this kernel,may be others users like me damage their phone
drakester09 said:
Same as Hexa, new HMP.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/7811/samsungs-exynos-5422-the-ideal-biglittle-exynos-5-hexa-5260
They actually moved the kernel version to 3.10 to get it supported.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. I asked this because when I compare the GS5 G900H to Note 3 Neo with Aututu, the former didn't show a much better result, while it has 2 more cores and all of these cores running at a higher clock.
hung2900 said:
Thanks. I asked this because when I compare the GS5 G900H to Note 3 Neo with Aututu, the former didn't show a much better result, while it has 2 more cores and all of these cores running at a higher clock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Benchmarks aren't all the story. Plus it really depends on who did the benchmark.
This device benches 36-38k on stock. I seriously doubt that the Note 3 neo gets that.
Edit according to GSM arena it gets 32k on a 720p screen, S5 is 1080p. There's no way you can compare them.
Sent from my SM-G900H using Tapatalk
Airboner said:
thank you for cauze of your custom kernel,my phone bricked -.- i hope that the stock freq you uploaded its also stock kernel..
pff i try to connect my phone with pc and doesnt recognise my own sd...plz delete this kernel,may be others users like me damage their phone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Read the OP. I'm not responsible for anything that happens to your device. It's your own responsibility. Welcome to xda. Sorry to be so blunt.
I tested both zips on the device coming from bone stock. Tim also flashed it and got no issues.
Both kernels aren't OC in any way that they could brick your device. You did something wrong or your recovery did so. I used PhilZ to test.
Might post instead what zip you flashed and also which custom recovery you had so we can help you instead of posting baseless accusations.
Have you flashed any mods or something else?
I tested this with stock rom, xposed, root and knox disabled by super su. The only thing that might come to mind is that somewhere knox is to blame.
drakester09 said:
Read the OP. I'm not responsible for anything that happens to your device. It's your own responsibility. Welcome to xda. Sorry to be so blunt.
I tested both zips on the device coming from bone stock. Tim also flashed it and got no issues.
Both kernels aren't OC in any way that they could brick your device. You did something wrong or your recovery did so. I used PhilZ to test.
Might post instead what zip you flashed and also which custom recovery you had so we can help you instead of posting baseless accusations.
Have you flashed any mods or something else?
I tested this with stock rom, xposed, root and knox disabled by super su. The only thing that might come to mind is that somewhere knox is to blame.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How can this brick your phone. I have it running whole day and its awesome. Using the lower cpu version and getting excellent battery. I use my phone alot with my sport using endomondo for over 3 hours cycling with podkicker and I have 62% still. Its smooth too no lagg on the lower cpu. So you deff did something wrong. I use stock latest update wannam and exposed module all knox crap deleted and rom debloated. CWM recovery and no problems.
---------- Post added at 07:46 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:42 PM ----------
Tim34 said:
Sure will do so and post later )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To the OP. I have no problems with the lower cpu kernel. Here is what i have found. Smooth and effecient. I used my phone with endomondo 3 hours with GPS and podkicker today and its evening here now. So far 9h26m with 60% battery left. 2h48min screen on time. There is no lagg with your kernal on the lower cpu as you thought so im happy with it. Want to see how long my battery will last. I use power saving mode as well and no stuttering.... Im happy :fingers-crossed:
Tim34 said:
To the OP. I have no problems with the lower cpu kernel. Here is what i have found. Smooth and effecient. I used my phone with endomondo 3 hours with GPS and podkicker today and its evening here now. So far 9h26m with 60% battery left. 2h48min screen on time. There is no lagg with your kernal on the lower cpu as you thought so im happy with it. Want to see how long my battery will last. I use power saving mode as well and no stuttering.... Im happy :fingers-crossed:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. What I don't like about 200MHz min is that I'm seeing too much oscillation in the CPU frequencies, A7 cores ends up jumping to 1GHz more often than with 400 or 500MHz min, I'm going to experiment and maybe set it to 400...
drakester09 said:
Thanks. What I don't like about 200MHz min is that I'm seeing too much oscillation in the CPU frequencies, A7 cores ends up jumping to 1GHz more often than with 400 or 500MHz min, I'm going to experiment and maybe set it to 400...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cool let me know and ill test it
Related
I have searched our Forum for anything on this phone overheating and there is one thread that I came across, but most people did not really have this issue at all. I mean in normal usage doing pretty much nothing my phone holds at 45-50C, given that is with all four cores operating, and if I play a game the cores have reached 70C and up, I am almost certain that is simply too high for this phone to be operating at. Also, even when I use eco mode the phone still idles around 40C and will reach temps as high as 64C. I am just wondering if I am alone or people have actually tested this also and have results similar to mine. I was hoping maybe there might be potential fixes for this or would I need to get a replacement device?
Don't have a great answer for you but I can tell you the phone has some safeguards in place. One that I am aware of is the screen brightness will self-dim until the phone temp drops.
Arlington- as in TX.?
Pony Express said:
Don't have a great answer for you but I can tell you the phone has some safeguards in place. One that I am aware of is the screen brightness will self-dim until the phone temp drops.
Arlington- as in TX.?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I live in Arlington, TX. Yeah, I noticed the self-dim feature, but that happens way too much, and too often, I mean I rarely get to use the phone at 100% brightness and no phone should be like that in my opinion. I am just curious if other people are dealing with similar issues, but I am checking eco mode now and my temps on idle are 36C-38C, its when I actually use my phone as a quad core phone, shocking, that it gets waaay hotter. I mean its hot on the back of the phone when I touch there and when I check the temp with an app. I feel I should be able to use my quad core as a quad core when need be, not have it get so hot its unbearable to hold, plus I don't want to do any damage with it reaching 70C temps.
Me, too in Arlington.
I would definitely say based on that it would be a good idea to exchange it, those temps are a bit much.
All og's get hot like that when playing games, etc. It is just how it is designed - like it or not / love it or leave it, lol.
I would have preferred they make the phone a little thicker with more heat sink so it could run full speed all the time when needed.
But they didn't. So, oh well. Maybe my next phone will fix that someday.
Jason
Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk 2
Pony Express said:
Me, too in Arlington.
I would definitely say based on that it would be a good idea to exchange it, those temps are a bit much.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Darn, I was hoping for something else, ha. Oh well, guess I will be dealing with that then, meh.. By any chance could you tell me your temps you are getting? So, I know what is normal for the device?
With 5 mins. light use (wi-fi, web, phone call, 2 texts, no gameplay) 25.4 C
---------- Post added at 03:28 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:16 PM ----------
If you are using a phone for AT&T network on T-mo, it is possible that is adding to the temp prob, not an expert here just an educated guess that the more it tries to find network signal the warmer it may get.
Pony Express said:
With 5 mins. light use (wi-fi, web, phone call, 2 texts, no gameplay) 25.4 C
---------- Post added at 03:28 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:16 PM ----------
If you are using a phone for AT&T network on T-mo, it is possible that is adding to the temp prob, not an expert here just an educated guess that the more it tries to find network signal the warmer it may get.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, but this happen on wifi only with data and no sim card installed, I am waiting to get an at&t sim card, lol. Shouldn't have done it online, but it cost 99 cents, instead of $15 bucks in the store.
Good call... hope it helps !!
Pony Express said:
Good call... hope it helps !!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, the strange thing is that I reverted back to stock everything, no root, or unlocked boot loader, and my overheating issue has been solved.. Weird. I only get around 35C even doing a benchmark with all four cores running at the same time. I think the Base rom and kernels still have some bugs that need to be worked out. I idle at 22C now, woot!
Glad to hear that!! Nice work.
am using the new build from Team Nocturnal with no probs. You might want to read through the thread first as some are having issues.... point is, no overheating and battery life seems good so far.
One thing I learned by testing, even going to the extent of exchanging my phone 2 days ago - if you charge your phone while it is off and unplug the charger it will drain the battery because it does not shut down the charge animation. The workaround is to simply turn the phone on and let it boot, either leave it on or then it is ok to turn off.
Pony Express said:
Glad to hear that!! Nice work.
am using the new build from Team Nocturnal with no probs. You might want to read through the thread first as some are having issues.... point is, no overheating and battery life seems good so far.
One thing I learned by testing, even going to the extent of exchanging my phone 2 days ago - if you charge your phone while it is off and unplug the charger it will drain the battery because it does not shut down the charge animation. The workaround is to simply turn the phone on and let it boot, either leave it on or then it is ok to turn off.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh wow, I did not even know that was an issue, ha, well, thanks for the heads up on that and I think I have to send my phone off to LG sadly, according to AT&T, but when I get it back I will be looking into their new base rom, I did skim the thread a little, and I am glad to hear there is no overheating. I am not sure if it was a kernel issue or the base rom itself, which is puzzling.
You may have selected Sk8's kernel during The Base's installation. I can't speak for it myself, but it's different than the stock kernel and may have been causing the problem?
Speculation at best.
No worries, Its what I am doing right now, just speculating, I mean I actually selected both kernels in the base rom, and tested them out. I was trying to figure out what the issue was. I think it might not have left me do a clean install, as I did select Sk8's Kernel first. So, I am thinking that the kernel stuck, even when I did a full wipe, before reinstalling and using the other kernel. I also was getting Kernel crashes, and it kept showing up a kernel crash screen, and asked me to go into download mode to store the dump file on my computer. I am new to android/Linux things, I am far more familiar with Windows based things, but android is the freedom OS of mobile devices. I like the customizations and things you can do with it, lol. Its sweet, and I am learning everyday, so that I can possible become a Dev later on. I have ported some things before and I know other forms of coding, just not the required programming languages for Linux.
My guess would be Sk8's kernel as well, I know it has the gpu overclocked, so if you are running graphics intensive apps it doesn't surprise me that you can be getting overheating issues.
Maybe try the bootloader unlock again to reinstall the freegee kernel...
Just a suggestion.
bleached45 said:
My guess would be Sk8's kernel as well, I know it has the gpu overclocked, so if you are running graphics intensive apps it doesn't surprise me that you can be getting overheating issues.
Maybe try the bootloader unlock again to reinstall the freegee kernel...
Just a suggestion.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
v1:
- initial release
v2:
- added GPU OC and UV settings
v2.1
- revert GPU settings until i get them more stable
- add voltage control via sysfs (use system tuner to select your custom UV settings)
- fix the black screen issue for alot of users
v2.2
- fast_charge on usb (icon will still show as slow charge but it will actually charge faster)
- cpu tweak to enable use of all freqs in high stress times like games and benchmarks
^ That is the change log for Sk8's Kernel, the gpu isn't overclocked anymore, it was in the initial release. So, I know its not that, and as I stated in a previous post I tried both of them, but even when I wiped everything, I think that Sk8's kernel was sticking. The reason I say this is even after a fresh install and selecting Freegee Kernel during installation, when the rom booted back up it would show Sk8's Kernel, and I would get Kernel crashes, which would also lead to a Crash screen, asking me to go into download mode to save the dump file. Though even after messing with that and monitoring it for several days, its hard to tell what it was, but I do know I am not having the issues anymore when I brought everything back to stock, I can assume it was one of the kernels, a combination, the base rom, but I am not 100% sure.
Zekk98 said:
v1:
...
^ That is the change log for Sk8's Kernel, the gpu isn't overclocked anymore, it was in the initial release. So, I know its not that, and as I stated in a previous post I tried both of them, but even when I wiped everything, I think that Sk8's kernel was sticking. The reason I say this is even after a fresh install and selecting Freegee Kernel during installation, when the rom booted back up it would show Sk8's Kernel, and I would get Kernel crashes, which would also lead to a Crash screen, asking me to go into download mode to save the dump file. Though even after messing with that and monitoring it for several days, its hard to tell what it was, but I do know I am not having the issues anymore when I brought everything back to stock, I can assume it was one of the kernels, a combination, the base rom, but I am not 100% sure.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Shows what I know, lol.
I was going by what I read for the Base ROM Aroma installer description, maybe the Base is still using an old version, but if you installed it on your own, then you should have been the latest.
Sorry, lol.
Title says all. If possible, to how much can you overclock it?
Honestly, I don't know why you would overclock for anything other than bragging rights. this thing is fast.
All it needs is for the software to be optimized.
Undervolt is always good too.
Sorry for not really answering your question, but i'm sure it's possible. I mean, if you can undervolt, I'm sure you can overvolt and mess with the multiplier and all that jazz.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2012320
That is what I'm talking about. International only though.
From what I've gathered from reading various posts, it is generally frowned upon as a bad idea for a variety of reasons, ultimately coming down to it will end up damaging your phone one way or another. So, yeah, of course, I'm sure you could find a way to do it, but if it were me I wouldn't(and this is coming from someone who overclocked every modern phone he's had except this one).
Once I see the trusted devs talking about it and saying it's a good idea...that's when I'll try it. Just my 2 cents.
SunnyChrono6 said:
Title says all. If possible, to how much can you overclock it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well - if it behaves like the hox
you should be able to get about +15%
but why you want to do that at all
normally you only underclock this battery eater
Sent from my HTC One X+ using xda app-developers app
Well I haven't found a way. Besides, I think the phone would heat up to much anyways.
sixcarnage said:
Well I haven't found a way. Besides, I think the phone would heat up to much anyways.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well - no kernel is supporting it
so it will be hard for you to find a way
Sent from my HTC One X+ using xda app-developers app
Have you ever actually run into a situation where the phone does not have enough cpu power? I know I haven't but there have been many situations where I wished I if more battery Mah, what you really want to overclock is the gpu which is stable running at about 600mhz. The main reason why the cpu might not perform well is due to the cpu getting stuck in single core mode or failing to scale properly, just head over to nik3r's or maxwen's kernel threads and flash the latest version.
ryanjsoo said:
Have you ever actually run into a situation where the phone does not have enough cpu power? I know I haven't but there have been many situations where I wished I if more battery Mah, what you really want to overclock is the gpu which is stable running at about 600mhz. The main reason why the cpu might not perform well is due to the cpu getting stuck in single core mode or failing to scale properly, just head over to nik3r's or maxwen's kernel threads and flash the latest version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Overclocking and people with EOS (Extreme Overclocking syndrome) care little about if they need the extra power for a purpose. There sole mission is to push a CPU as far as they dare without frying it
This is fine with a PC, as PC's have all manner of 3rd party cooling solutions. But I totally agree with everyone that trying to overclock the HOX+ CPU is futile and borderline stupid. It struggles to keep itself cool at the best of times. Putting the CPU through extra thermal stress for no reason and to gain little in the way of performance is not something I would risk....
---------- Post added at 09:57 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:55 AM ----------
maxwen said:
well - no kernel is supporting it
so it will be hard for you to find a way
Sent from my HTC One X+ using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Without being a ****.... He could just try and compile his own kernel. There are plenty of tuts on the subject and setting up the environment is not too difficult :silly:
i took geokilla's f2fs version of Calkulin's rooted stock rom and set it up to work on a hybrid f2fs/ext4 setup. /data /cache on f2fs, and /system is ext4.
credits:
@zaphodbeeb for his f2fs 44s rom
@ak for the kernel and kernel manager
@Calkulin for the rooted stock 05q
@geokilla for converting that to f2fs
flash at your own risk. it is running fine on my end and very snappy.
to install:
wipe for new rom
rom
extras
ak 087 and ukm
i don't mind and thanks or two here and there either.
hi is it work in multirom?
isoladisegnata said:
hi is it work in multirom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it does not. i am working on translating these xiaomi apps as i go so i can get these new ants smartcams working. it is taking a while using google translate. i will look into making a multirom version tonight.
phermey said:
it does not. i am working on translating these xiaomi apps as i go so i can get these new ants smartcams working. it is taking a while using google translate. i will look into making a multirom version tonight.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok..tnx a lot
Very good work bro
isoladisegnata said:
hi is it work in multirom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i am looking at the things i need to do to convert the temasek rom into multirom. and it has already been done on this updater-script. i think it might work. i don't do the multirom thing so i cannot try it to find out. what is the worst that can happen... it hangs and you gotta reflash something else? give it a shot and let peeps know if ya would.
kaushal7007 said:
Very good work bro
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks
Can you please upload battery backup ss and benchmarks
kaushal7007 said:
Can you please upload battery backup ss and benchmarks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i can do an antutu once i get done charging. don't like the heat from doing both. gimme a bit. not sure what you mean with battery backup ss.
phermey said:
i can do an antutu once i get done charging. don't like the heat from doing both. gimme a bit. not sure what you mean with battery backup ss.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Battery life screen shot..
Sent from my A001 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
k. not much of a point in posting the battery life till i run through a charge. but will post one when i do. i can say that i installed the rom at 25% had some issues and ended up flashing it three times until i got the updater script right. after that i messed around with the xiaomi apps.
i have 3h33s on battery.
1h14m sot
21m voice calls.
and the two apps them selves takes up 7% while it was sitting with 25% brightness for an hour while i translated. and was running a bit of wifi in the background to translate and stream cameras.
stuck it on to charge at 13%
so early projections are pretty dad gum good id say.
Added to OnePlus One index thread:
[INDEX] OnePlus One Resources Compilation Roll-Up
Transmitted via Bacon
so two days 4h sot. 22min phone. streamed a 4 gig new hunger games over chromecast (no screen). watched 30 min of ufc (local cast would not stream it). played twenty or so min of leo's fortune. all of the rest of screen time was from gmail, chrome, hangouts, xoaomi dropcam.
the antutu was quite low and unverified. 44k. i am used to seeing 50k on the temasek builds. although that 50k lowers to 40k when im running the ak kernel. so maybe the kernel has something to do with it.
overall... stock is not as fast as the temasek builds, and i hate having to wait 3-5 secs for the lockscreen to appear.
I've made a new version of the 70°,75° and 80° thermal mods which I'm hoping will improve battery life without sacrificing performance at all. If you've been running any my original thermal mods and would like to test out the new versions and give me your feedback it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Rob
Just head on over to my original CTT thread to download it
Here's the link to the original thread. http://forum.xda-developers.com/lg-g3/development/thermal-mod-t2907363
Also I just added a new beta 3 version of the 75° mod here's the link
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=60916030&postcount=626
They're towards the bottom of the op
Just flash in recovery and wipe the caches
Wow, I'm the first one.
phillymade said:
Wow, I'm the first one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol I just posted it not more than 5 minutes ago
Robshr said:
Lol I just posted it not more than 5 minutes ago
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So we are the only ones awake at this hour on a Sunday morning!
phillymade said:
So we are the only ones awake at this hour on a Sunday morning!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Looks that way. I've only been up since 1 when I woke up with the idea and started working on it I'm really hoping for some good results
Gonna try this!
Later though... planning on doing a total wipe and start from scratch.
It booted up no problem. First boot was no too long, a little less than flashing a ROM. I'm at 100% battery, going to see what happens throughout the day.
Suscribed to the thread !
So the purpose of this new release is battery saving ?
Marcovanbasten said:
Suscribed to the thread !
So the purpose of this new release is battery saving ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes though it may be minor but I'm trying to get the best battery without decreasing the performance at all
Robshr said:
Yes though it may be minor but I'm trying to get the best battery without decreasing the performance at all
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your work Rob.
Battery saving would be awesome !
I know this was build for stock roms but I flashed it on cm12.1 and it seems to be working fine. Is there a reason it wouldn't work on cm12.1 or if I can check to see if it is working? Thanks
Perhaps it's just the excitement of the new mod, but I feel as though there is a reduction of heat being produced by the device. Has anyone else noticed this?
Got it installed. What specifically do you want feedback on?
I imagine I won't have a feel for the battery difference for a couple days. Anything else?
GollyJer said:
Got it installed. What specifically do you want feedback on?
I imagine I won't have a feel for the battery difference for a couple days. Anything else?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's pretty much it is battery life I want to see if the changes I've made have made any difference if not I've got a few more tweaks I'll try but this is just a start
Testing on D851 LP.
Testing on D855 flashed over last 75 version
I just installed your new 70° mod on my vs985... Let you know how it goes... Thanks
-SD 4.0/SD 4.1 Kernel-
just installed on international D855.. i'll return in a few days
I also just installed on International D855 running ChupaChups 4.2 and will report back in a few days.
currydude said:
I know this was build for stock roms but I flashed it on cm12.1 and it seems to be working fine. Is there a reason it wouldn't work on cm12.1 or if I can check to see if it is working? Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To check to see if it's working you can download 3c toolbox formally known as android tuner and under CPU you can see the temp and see if it throttles down at the correct temperature and I don't see any reason why it shouldn't work with cm12
Please let me know if it works and how well so I can post it in the op
Hoping to get a stable zip up for people that wish to try to maximize battery life
This is my phone. Tried with another and it didn't like it so much. Work in progress. Lola
https://youtu.be/Bj8uPgGd6uw
Hoping to get 20 hours screen on time. Around 3 days worth.. Will see
Found your thread. We can talk here now. Hit me up if you need assistance.
Sent from my C525c using Tapatalk
---------- Post added at 10:22 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:20 AM ----------
Moody66 said:
Hardware wise. Other phone didn't like lower voltage. Lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is the other phone on CM, or more simply put, using a custom kernel?
Sent from my C525c using Tapatalk
SHM said:
Found your thread. We can talk here now. Hit me up if you need assistance.
Sent from my C525c using Tapatalk
---------- Post added at 10:22 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:20 AM ----------
Is the other phone on CM, or more simply put, using a custom kernel?
Sent from my C525c using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same as mine. Had to put it back though. Its the wife's. I know no CPUs are exact on capabilities. Hers wasn't as forgiving. Still have tweaking to do. Lol. Less voltage drop. Won't be as huge on savings though. I figured as long as these have been made they would be more refined. Sigh. Running toms original release. Just playing with governors and voltage.
Dropped max down just a little. One of the guys that does beanstalk taught me a little. Wish they would do a bean build. I started but the old laptop is having issues. Bad ram i think. Will replace it tomorrow and try again. If I have to i will throw everything on my newer laptop. Hate tearing windows out of it. Lol. Got to much to do today with wife and kid both sick
Here is what I have do far on this charge.
Moody66 said:
Here is what I have do far on this charge.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You had 7 hours of screen time and only dropped 27% What are you using to achieve this?
MikeyLee said:
You had 7 hours of screen time and only dropped 27% What are you using to achieve this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Modifications. Over 10 hours now and am at 62%. Lol
How long before you're ready to reveal these mods to us?
Moody66 said:
Modifications. Over 10 hours now and am at 62%. Lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When can we test this out?
MikeyLee said:
When can we test this out?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Still working on it. All phones are different. Some CPUs handle voltage changes better than others.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B97V_YadJs2baVJZSlVJMUJPZjg/view?usp=docslist_api
Over 12 hours and I am at 55% battery. This thing may make 24 hours screen on. Lol
Looking forward to this when it's available
MikeyLee said:
Looking forward to this when it's available
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK. 50% battery and I have 13 hours 43 minutes screen on. 42 hours off charge. For three mates total to tinker with. Guess I will see what the lowest I can make that all three will run properly on.
Moody66 said:
OK. 50% battery and I have 13 hours 43 minutes screen on. 42 hours off charge. For three mates total to tinker with. Guess I will see what the lowest I can make that all three will run properly on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dang man let me test this lol
Done a lot of digging to find a flashable that allows the user to make adjustments to voltages and such for a device of similar hardware. Starting to think there isn't one. Lol all phones being different it really needs to be tweakable by the user. What works fine on my mate 2 doesnt for another mate 2 here. Ideas?
Moody66 said:
Done a lot of digging to find a flashable that allows the user to make adjustments to voltages and such for a device of similar hardware. Starting to think there isn't one. Lol all phones being different it really needs to be tweakable by the user. What works fine on my mate 2 doesnt for another mate 2 here. Ideas?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This sounds promising. I hope someone can some up with something soon!
---------- Post added at 11:57 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:07 AM ----------
Out of curiosity, what sort of issues did you see with one device that you didn't see with the other?
MikeyLee said:
This sounds promising. I hope someone can some up with something soon!
---------- Post added at 11:57 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:07 AM ----------
Out of curiosity, what sort of issues did you see with one device that you didn't see with the other?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And what changes were made to the first MT2?
Maybe a flashable wouldn't be ideal given the issues found amongst different devices. Possibly a guide using your tweaks as a maximum base line would be doable along with mentioned recommendations for medium and minimum modifications. Maximum being the best battery life but could result in crashes from some and not other, medium being the ideal inbetween that should suffice for everyone (theoretically speaking), and minimum meaning it will certainly work for everyone but battery life will have a slight improvement. Just brainstorming though.
However, if a flashable zip is what you seek for which would allow users to choose some options then may I suggest making an Aroma Flashable Zip?
Sent from my C525c using Tapatalk
SHM said:
Maybe a flashable wouldn't be ideal given the issues found amongst different devices. Possibly a guide using your tweaks as a maximum base line would be doable along with mentioned recommendations for medium and minimum modifications. Maximum being the best battery life but could result in crashes from some and not other, medium being the ideal inbetween that should suffice for everyone (theoretically speaking), and minimum meaning it will certainly work for everyone but battery life will have a slight improvement. Just brainstorming though.
However, if a flashable zip is what you seek for which would allow users to choose some options then may I suggest making an Aroma Flashable Zip?
Sent from my C525c using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
SHM said:
Maybe a flashable wouldn't be ideal given the issues found amongst different devices. Possibly a guide using your tweaks as a maximum base line would be doable along with mentioned recommendations for medium and minimum modifications. Maximum being the best battery life but could result in crashes from some and not other, medium being the ideal inbetween that should suffice for everyone (theoretically speaking), and minimum meaning it will certainly work for everyone but battery life will have a slight improvement. Just brainstorming though.
However, if a flashable zip is what you seek for which would allow users to choose some options then may I suggest making an Aroma Flashable Zip?
Sent from my C525c using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Excellent idea. Set back to defaults and it sureeee made a difference. Screenshots supplied.
Lol. You can clearly see it in the pics.
Moody66 said:
Excellent idea. Set back to defaults and it sureeee made a difference. Screenshots supplied.
Lol. You can clearly see it in the pics.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Impressive. Like I said I'm willing to test it out if you want to send me some settings recommendations and whatever else I would need.