I want to buy an android phone , but i am not understanding that which display is better for smart phone.
Please tell me that which type of display is suitable for me , Like
super amoled
IPS QHD Touchscreen, 16M colors, Multitouch
HD LCD Display
16M colors, IPS LCD captive touchscreen
FWVGA Screen
IPS LCD capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors, Multitouch
WHICH ONE IS BETTER IN ABOVE DISPLAYS
Hello
Some explanations :
FWVGA : resolution of 850 x 480
QHD : resolution of 2560 x 1440
qHD : resolution of 960 x 540
HD : 1280x720
you talk about screen technology too :
IPS
Super Amoled
Generally, Super Amoled will be better to display black pixel as it can deactivate pixel. By the way, with this technology the power consumption can be reduced too. Displayed colors are not very accurate too. Used by Samsung
IPS is older and had several evolution. Used by all other
My recommendation :
HD IPS LCD Display 16M colors multitouch
Related
Hi guyses.
Is it possible to use the s-pen from galaxy note on galaxy s2?
I would love to use a pen like it's used on the note.
Looks totally awesome.
Tried. Not working at all. That stylus is not capacitive
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
galaxy s2 and galaxy note have different screen
Thanks
thanks for the info. you guys answer my question too.
Samsung Galaxy Note – 5.3 inches Super AMOLED Capacitive touchscreen display
Samsung Galaxy S II – 4.3 inches Super AMOLED Capacitive touchscreen display
Both the phones uses the same technology i.e., the Super AMOLED capacitive touchscreen display for which the Samsung has got critical acclaim though the display of Galaxy Note is on the larger side which stands at 5.3 inches in height providing 285 ppi pixel density and with a maximum resolution of 1280 x 800 pixels. When you come to Galaxy S II, it has 4.3 inches Gorilla Glass display with maximum resolution of 800 x 480 pixels at 217 ppi pixel density.
Both the phones have Gorilla Glass display with multi-touch input method provided with various sensor technologies like accelerometer for auto rotate, proximity sensor and gyroscope.
gordonko said:
Samsung Galaxy Note – 5.3 inches Super AMOLED Capacitive touchscreen display
Samsung Galaxy S II – 4.3 inches Super AMOLED Capacitive touchscreen display
Both the phones uses the same technology i.e., the Super AMOLED capacitive touchscreen display for which the Samsung has got critical acclaim though the display of Galaxy Note is on the larger side which stands at 5.3 inches in height providing 285 ppi pixel density and with a maximum resolution of 1280 x 800 pixels. When you come to Galaxy S II, it has 4.3 inches Gorilla Glass display with maximum resolution of 800 x 480 pixels at 217 ppi pixel density.
Both the phones have Gorilla Glass display with multi-touch input method provided with various sensor technologies like accelerometer for auto rotate, proximity sensor and gyroscope.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All that is the same, but the digitizers are different. Which is why the s-pen for the Note doesn't work on the i9100.
i was told its not 1080p but its better then 720p ?
1280x800. HD 720 is 1280x720
rgarjr said:
1280x800. HD 720 is 1280x720
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so slightly better then 720p?
Slightly. It just has added height. It is a 16:10 ratio instead of 16:9. Its not a big difference, and is basically the same thing between 1920x1080 versus 1920x1200.
Personally, the extra height is a plus.
Aspect ratios are a funny beast. HDTV (720p as well as 1080p or FullHD in marketing terms) is 16:9. 800x480, which I consider to be the "classic" Android resolution--it's been more or less standard from the time of the Nexus one, up through the SGS2--has a 15:9 (aka 5:3) aspect ratio, so it is slightly wider when held in portrait than a GNexus. The Note is 1280x800, so at 16:10 (or 8:5) it lies in between the two--not as skinny as a 720p phone, but not as wide as a "typical" 800x480 phone.
On a complete tangent, I miss when 16:10 was the standard for monitors. Most monitors now are 1080p rather than 1920x1200; the latter is really a superior resolution for a computer imo.
Don't forget it uses Pentile display, not RGB, so there are less subpixels than regular screens. With that said, I thought my Note has excellent screen.
5.3"
1280x800
285 Pixels Per Inch (PPI)
WXGA HD Super AMOLED - PenTile
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_Note#cite_note-0
So when encoding a video what should I set the resolution too ?
phillyrican said:
So when encoding a video what should I set the resolution too ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1280x720 to keep the same aspect ratio
No its 1280x800, which is .625 aka 16:10, not .5625 which is 16:9. It doesn't matter though, keep your video at its original ratio, if you want to stretch the video, let the video player do it.
Hi guys,
I currently have a 9.7 inch ICS tablet which has a pixel density of 132, just like ipad 1 & 2. I thought it was not that bad until I got a phone with pretty high ppi (HTC One V), and now it suddenly makes my tablet look so cheap when I look at it. So I would like a tablet with higher ppi, and I thought how about an 8 inch tablet with 1024 x 768 resolution? So I tried the ppi calculation online, and it gave me 160. are 160ppi and 132 ppi a big difference in text sharpness? Currently, on my 9.7 tablet, even the blue digital clock in the status bar is somewhat pixelated.
Also I like to use 4:3 tablet in a portrait mode only, so when I'm web browsing with my 9.7 inch tablet in portrait mode, some small texts are kind of readable, BUT uncomfortably... like you can go on Yahoo desktop website in portrait mode, and try to make out the smallest text in that website, and it's kind of garbled looking. So I was wondering, IF PPI is higher, EVEN THOUGH the screen is smaller, will that make the texts sharper for the same webpages? If I had both 8 inch and 9.7 tablets, I could test it out, but I don't, so I need expert's knowledge..
Also, 8 inch tablet is cheaper and lighter than 9.7 or 10.1 tablets so I am considering this option more now.
Please answer my questions above!
Thank you.
Don't get too star struck, htc devices are meant to beautiful and only other htc devices can give you that premium look and feel, ( no company tops htc in the beauty department). My htc sensation resolution is 540×960 and has a 256 pixel density and 240 dpi. It come down to the quality of your tablet, by increasing your dpi (almost like zooming in) you will see more pixels (BAD!), but you will see the difference is you increase the ppi, however it depends on your display. Right now the top android phones (htc one s/v and sgs2 & 3 and etc) have better displays than tablets and those 7 to 8 inch tablets aren't recommended also. They are build to be budget friendly and the display quality won't be too good either. Maybe you should get a better android tablet (asus transformer prime the BEST) or iPad+Retina Display= Big Smile
I was at the Gadget Show Live yesterday and compared the 920 and 820 side by side with the same themes and the same photos. The blacks on the 820 were more darker than the 920 and blended with the black display bezel more. The red tiles were more red on the 820 and more orangey on the 920. I guess this is because the 820 has an amoled screen and the 920 has a tft screen. So despite the drop in resolution (which is hardly noticeable on a 4.3" screen) in my eyes the 820 has a better screen (to the eye) than the 920. Reds are red and blacks are blacker. Interesting.
I guess the Samsung Ativ S would have an even better screen with a Super Amoled display. Hmmm!
Amoled has too much rich colours.It is far behind the reality.IPS of Lumia 920 has more natural colours and better view angels.
tboy2000 said:
I was at the Gadget Show Live yesterday and compared the 920 and 820 side by side with the same themes and the same photos. The blacks on the 820 were more darker than the 920 and blended with the black display bezel more. The red tiles were more red on the 820 and more orangey on the 920. I guess this is because the 820 has an amoled screen and the 920 has a tft screen. So despite the drop in resolution (which is hardly noticeable on a 4.3" screen) in my eyes the 820 has a better screen (to the eye) than the 920. Reds are red and blacks are blacker. Interesting.
I guess the Samsung Ativ S would have an even better screen with a Super Amoled display. Hmmm!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
IPS panels have better color accuracy than any other technology and that's why they are used in displays demanding accurate color interpretation. I have no idea where you got the idea that the screen was tft, but it's not.
More saturated colors and deeper blacks don't necessarily equal more accurate colors.
IPS FTW. I like Amoled but technology has since advanced. I do like the rich colors in AMOLED but even the Super IPS display on the One X has better natural feel.
As far as I can tell you from my Galaxy S2, the SuperAMOLED wears out VERY quickly! I have a stain where the android status bar is already (after about 6 months)...
Sent from my GT-I9100G using xda app-developers app
Both technology have pros and cons:
Pros for AMOLED:
* deeps black and contrast is infinity.
* more colorful or vivid (can be con for others).
* much faster pixel response time (LCD can't even come close to it even the new 920 LCD).
* No viewing angle limitations.
Cons for AMOLED:
* not as bright as LCD.
* consumes more power when display mostly white screen.
* Colors are not accurate
* Pixel density currently can't match LCDs (the top of line 720p panels are using PenTile to fake the resolutions).
* Burn in is an real issue. Panel life span is around 8000 to 14000 hours.
Pros for LCD:
* Can be very bright. A few times more than AMOLED.
* Accurate color reproduction.
* Power consumption is constant given a back light level regardless of screen pixel color.
* Much higher pixel density than AMOLED without using the PenTile.
* No burn-in. Panel life is as long as the backlight.
Cons for LCD:
* Blacks can't be true black. The best LCD screen can only have true contrast level around 1000:1 (don't trust those marketing numbers using so called dynamic contrast ratios).
* Pixel response time is slow and noticable.
* Viewing angle is not as good as AMOLED. Off angle colors are way off.
The blacks of the 920 are really dark grey - to me anyway.
which display will consume more battery if we perform same operations on both phone. in other words my question is do display with more pixels consumers more battery than the display with less pixels consider screen size and type of display.
BQ - white pixel vs black pixel which consumer more battery.