which is the Best ROM available for XT912
I had installed cm-12.1-20150516-NIGHTLY-spyder ROM but it had bugs and battery draining quickly,
if any one have suggestion for ROM please post which increase performance and battery life of XT912 compared to stock JB that came with Droid Razr
thugs.lif3 said:
which is the Best ROM available for XT912
I had installed cm-12.1-20150516-NIGHTLY-spyder ROM but it had bugs and battery draining quickly,
if any one have suggestion for ROM please post which increase performance and battery life of XT912 compared to stock JB that came with Droid Razr
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no best rom, you'll receive lots of differing opinions on the same thing. Only way is to try yourself and find the one that fits you best as that's what these forums are about.
see Ohmster's Guide: CM11 Performance and Maintenance
thugs.lif3 said:
which is the Best ROM available for XT912
I had installed cm-12.1-20150516-NIGHTLY-spyder ROM but it had bugs and battery draining quickly,
if any one have suggestion for ROM please post which increase performance and battery life of XT912 compared to stock JB that came with Droid Razr
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Or u could try downloading cm 10.2.1 from the CyanogenMod website. Its fast and has less ram consumption.
Have a nice day[emoji5]
thugs.lif3 said:
which is the Best ROM available for XT912
I had installed cm-12.1-20150516-NIGHTLY-spyder ROM but it had bugs and battery draining quickly,
if any one have suggestion for ROM please post which increase performance and battery life of XT912 compared to stock JB that came with Droid Razr
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sd Shadow is right, there are a lot of roms for this phone and it's based on personal preference. I was a devoted user Cyanogenmod but unfortunately, things seemed to fall apart at the end of their CM11 run. CM12 and CM12.1 have been too laggy to use for this phone. Surprisingly, the best rom in my humble opinion for this phone has been tonyt's AOKP rom. The link to the rom/forum is below:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/droid-razr/development/4-4-4-aokp-t2919944
I used Greenify and LagFix Premium with this rom. I never had any issues, no FC's, no lag. It was smooth and stable. As a "flashaholic", I couldn't leave well enough alone, I softbricked my XT912 with a low battery. While waiting for my cable, I acquired a used Galaxy S4 at an unbelievable price I just couldn't pass up and using that at the moment. But I'm thinking of returning to my XT912 because I really miss it. Yeah, I know, I must be crazy!
Another vote for tonyt's AOKP ROM. Currently on my stock slot. Had an older version there, tried newer version in slot 2. Worked flawlessly. Tried LS 5.1 in slot 1. No led while screen ON. Put latest version of this on stock.... Yes, it's Kitkat. Yes, tried Lollipop. Sticking with this.
Related
Hello
I have just come from a htc sensation with an ICS rom with nova launcher, getting around 20 hours battery life and a no bugs ICS experience with nova launcher and a few tweaks such as miui battery bar, centre clock etc.
I am currently using pure ICS with nova launcher set the way I want and it's very good but the battery lasts about 8 hours and there are no tweaks.
Are there any other ICS roms with better battery life and some tweaks? I can always put nova launcher on top if it is not in the rom.
I don't use the phone an awful lot and have the exact same apps andwidgets as on my sensation, hence why the battery life is strange to me, is this normal for a sgs2?
I was using the same rom , then Andyx from both ics and battery life on both was pants, I then flashed cm9 experimental which is now on nightlies and I think its the dogs bollox, only downside is no USB connect to PC until they fix it, but using from manager premium you don't need a PC anyway everything is straight to the phone, a minor hiccup for an awesome rom
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Have you got a link for that rom? I can't find it anywhere
Might as well wait for release of genuine Samsung ICS .
jje
I have been using CM9 and it's working amazing only thing is you need to live with no MTP, video recording and certain other things I forget *thats what google is for* I highly recommend it!
SensationAlex said:
Hello
I have just come from a htc sensation with an ICS rom with nova launcher, getting around 20 hours battery life and a no bugs ICS experience with nova launcher and a few tweaks such as miui battery bar, centre clock etc.
I am currently using pure ICS with nova launcher set the way I want and it's very good but the battery lasts about 8 hours and there are no tweaks.
Are there any other ICS roms with better battery life and some tweaks? I can always put nova launcher on top if it is not in the rom.
I don't use the phone an awful lot and have the exact same apps andwidgets as on my sensation, hence why the battery life is strange to me, is this normal for a sgs2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Aokp is best for tweaks.
Battery life us ok, it can last a day for me :L
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
you could try WajkIUI if you like MIUI im on this rom for 2 weeks now and i'm really impressed
you could also wait about 2 weeks for ics to be released officially by Samsung
Whatever happened to trying out ROMs for yourself......
ICS is so 2011 we want Jelly Bean
ALL ICS roms which I've tried are not suitable for day to day use. CM9 by codeworx was the best I tried. better wait for a stable release.
this is a beautifull rom [ROM][ICS]XXLPH SconcauTeam Revolution Custom ROM GS2 OTA version
Resurrection Remix ics v9.4 black edition XXLPH 4.0.3 FULL-Wipe is a nice rom - has a few bugs though ... f.e. i cant change the lockscreen image ... the gallery keeps crashing... i had problems syncing google calendar...
well there are some small problems, but its a nice rom so far - pretty stable, smooth and fast.
[ROM] Lite'ning Rom v1.1 XXLPH - Fast as Lightning and
Offical forum
Great ROM. I didn't experience any FC's. Battery life is good. In my case 0 bugs so highly recommended! Check it out and see for yourself.
Or you could just try a bunch for yourself and tell us!
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
I don't want to try loads of roms, my main concern with my current one is the battery life so testing lots of roms isn't great for me as I need my phone at work, that's why I asked peoples opinions. I just want a nice ICS rom with a few tweaks and good battery life. I hate touch wiz so the official ICS update is no good for me.
The sgs2 is a lot faster than my sensation but with my current battery life I would rather swap back to the slower phone and get nearly three times the battery life.
There are also a lot of roms for the s2 hence why I asked people rather than trying loads and they also get updated nearly every day.
I suggest you don't go for ics just yet if your only real concern is battery and as for tw, tough luck I'm afraid.
Try the latest stock gb with neak custom kernels. Best battery life I ever had. Oh and on the subject of best roms, that's totally down to personal configuration.
Sent from the future using xda ultimate edition.
you can try aokp
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1513150
or
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1530179
great rom
SensationAlex said:
I don't want to try loads of roms, my main concern with my current one is the battery life so testing lots of roms isn't great for me as I need my phone at work, that's why I asked peoples opinions. I just want a nice ICS rom with a few tweaks and good battery life. I hate touch wiz so the official ICS update is no good for me.
T
Yes but ICS is a beta test rom base why not wait for roms to be built on the actual working firmware . I have yet to see one ICS beta based rom that does not have a problem or two and they tend to be random and varied judged by all the help ICS rom xxx dont work posts . Plus battery life is not that good on the leaks .
You might get ten replies that ICS zzz rom is good but wont see the hundred users that have removed it .
jje
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For instance, I have installed and uninstalled both LPH* and LitePro's ROM based on LPH*. Just don't even bother until the official build is released.
(*latest ICS beta leak)
M current ICS ROM
If its any help, i'm using AndyX ROM v5.3. I haven't updated it yet to v6.0 since that has problems with the camera and gallery. Resurrection ICS is really nice but it makes my phone hot for some reason so i dont use it.
You may want to try this one:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1513150
IMHO, best ICS rom out there. Using it for 5 days now (heavy user) - not a single FC in 5 days, very stable, fast, customization options rock! Battery life 12 hours really heavy usage / 24 hours moderate usage. No bugs, except video not saving and no FM radio, but these are known...
Just got a brand new Razr Maxx on the cheap! So excited to have freedom from my charger! Made the switch from galaxy nexus just because of the battery life. Anyways, I have rooted the device and installed safestrap 3.0, and I want to install CM10 but I don't know the difference between Kexec and Stock type builds. Can someone please explain the differences for me? From what I've read I think maybe kexec builds can run custom kernels? I did a bunch of searching but I'm clueless still. Although rombitch.com is down, I found a download page on goo.im for hashcode's cm10 builds here (http://goo.im/devs/Hashcode/spyder/cm10). Does hashcode upload the same builds as the ones on rombitch.com/spyder, or does anyone have a link for the latest version? Are there any drawbacks from going OEM stock to CM10? From older posts i found in my search battery life and signal issues were present but I'm curious what you all think currently. I am pretty happy with the stock motoblur ics and bloat apps removed surprisingly, but after just 1 day of use I'm already eager to try and get the purest android experience.
Thanks
Wes
wtfmate913 said:
Just got a brand new Razr Maxx on the cheap! So excited to have freedom from my charger! Made the switch from galaxy nexus just because of the battery life. Anyways, I have rooted the device and installed safestrap 3.0, and I want to install CM10 but I don't know the difference between Kexec and Stock type builds. Can someone please explain the differences for me? From what I've read I think maybe kexec builds can run custom kernels? I did a bunch of searching but I'm clueless still. Although rombitch.com is down, I found a download page on goo.im for hashcode's cm10 builds here (http://goo.im/devs/Hashcode/spyder/cm10). Does hashcode upload the same builds as the ones on rombitch.com/spyder, or does anyone have a link for the latest version? Are there any drawbacks from going OEM stock to CM10? From older posts i found in my search battery life and signal issues were present but I'm curious what you all think currently. I am pretty happy with the stock motoblur ics and bloat apps removed surprisingly, but after just 1 day of use I'm already eager to try and get the purest android experience.
Thanks
Wes
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know the differences other than stock is what is in the OTA ICS builds?
But I do know that what is on goo should be identical to what's on rombitch and rombot.
Sent from my CM10 XT912
Yes kexec can run custom kernels but the builds currently have some big issues, especially the lack of deep sleep so it kills your battery. Moving to cm10 you lose the ability of web top, HDMI, and screen rotation animation.
Full-Throttle Team
moderator at bdhroms.freeforums.org
prsterero said:
Yes kexec can run custom kernels but the builds currently have some big issues, especially the lack of deep sleep so it kills your battery. Moving to cm10 you lose the ability of web top, HDMI, and screen rotation animation.
Full-Throttle Team
moderator at bdhroms.freeforums.org
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
also I believe that camera is not working in kexec roms
thanks alot everyone. I got a stock-cm10 build up and running with safestrap v3 and it's running great.
wtfmate913 said:
thanks alot everyone. I got a stock-cm10 build up and running with safestrap v3 and it's running great.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did u use Hashcode Rom? I run it in slot 1 and LOVE it. Never a problem. Camera works great!
Hmm I'm on a kexec rom (LiquidSmooth) and deep sleep is working great and the camera also works flawlessly.
Edit: I just realised that OP was created ages ago
Hello there. Yes I have hashcodes ROM installed but at the moment I'm running the new AOKP build that is newly posted. Hashcodes works great but for some reason I still get a problem with the ROM getting stuck at a black screen sometimes when I boot and I can't figure it out. Tried older safe strap version. Deleted ROM slot1 completely...fresh installs...fixed permissions....and I still get that problem.
Comparison
Camera on stock roms is better
also the stability is better on stock roms rarely any crashes
some stock roms give the ability to use some of the motorola goodies.
whereas with kexec u get
smoother UI and android 4.2.2
Innovative features like integrated pie controls and customization( try liquidsmooth)
and also the ability to overclock with the use of the JBX OCE kernel by dtrail1
<---hit thanks if i helped any of u! :laugh:
Gautam Padirooted said:
Camera on stock roms is better
also the stability is better on stock roms rarely any crashes
some stock roms give the ability to use some of the motorola goodies.
whereas with kexec u get
smoother UI and android 4.2.2
Innovative features like integrated pie controls and customization( try liquidsmooth)
and also the ability to overclock with the use of the JBX OCE kernel by dtrail1
<---hit thanks if i helped any of u! :laugh:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kexec does not have FHD video recording, not even HD, only SD works for now. Well, you can use LG camera and it does work Full HD but it is not a standard app. Newer dtrail kernels are very stable, I have not had a reboot for over a week, just look @ some screenshots in his kernel thread. CM10.1 is very fast, very overclockable (1.5Ghz in my case) while vanilla rom (ICS or JB) are less overclockable (up to 1.35Ghz) and slower on top of that. They offer some futures not found in CM - webtop mode and working HDMI for example (not to forget about FHD recording).
Debloated vanilla rom would be a good compromise, especially with some custom launcher.
mat9v said:
Kexec does not have FHD video recording, not even HD, only SD works for now. Well, you can use LG camera and it does work Full HD but it is not a standard app. Newer dtrail kernels are very stable, I have not had a reboot for over a week, just look @ some screenshots in his kernel thread. CM10.1 is very fast, very overclockable (1.5Ghz in my case) while vanilla rom (ICS or JB) are less overclockable (up to 1.35Ghz) and slower on top of that. They offer some futures not found in CM - webtop mode and working HDMI for example (not to forget about FHD recording).
Debloated vanilla rom would be a good compromise, especially with some custom launcher.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is this vanilla ROM of which you speak?
Sent from my XT912 using Tapatalk 2
garywojdan81 said:
What is this vanilla ROM of which you speak?
Sent from my XT912 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Those are Motorola roms.
mat9v said:
Those are Motorola roms.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, never heard stock ROMs referred to that way.
Sent from my XT912 using Tapatalk 2
mat9v said:
Kexec does not have FHD video recording, not even HD, only SD works for now. Well, you can use LG camera and it does work Full HD but it is not a standard app. Newer dtrail kernels are very stable, I have not had a reboot for over a week, just look @ some screenshots in his kernel thread. CM10.1 is very fast, very overclockable (1.5Ghz in my case) while vanilla rom (ICS or JB) are less overclockable (up to 1.35Ghz) and slower on top of that. They offer some futures not found in CM - webtop mode and working HDMI for example (not to forget about FHD recording).
Debloated vanilla rom would be a good compromise, especially with some custom launcher.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All of this will be fixed, be patient, hashcode is working on it! And yes I do prefer Cm 10.1 over stock rom to be honest. I never had any issues with cm 10.1 RC2.
HDMI, webtop and 1080p recording is on his todo-list and I am confident that he will fix it.
I'm not worried or dissatisfied, was just answering a question really I'm using CM10.1 myself and really happy with it.
mat9v said:
I'm not worried or dissatisfied, was just answering a question really I'm using CM10.1 myself and really happy with it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know just answering some of question for members who have not tested cm 10.1 and are worried about the performance
wtfmate913 said:
Hello there. Yes I have hashcodes ROM installed but at the moment I'm running the new AOKP build that is newly posted. Hashcodes works great but for some reason I still get a problem with the ROM getting stuck at a black screen sometimes when I boot and I can't figure it out. Tried older safe strap version. Deleted ROM slot1 completely...fresh installs...fixed permissions....and I still get that problem.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same black screen problem here with AOKP on slot 2- BMM.
and there're same complains on same problem with cm and liquidsmooth
Hi all,
I keep reading but I don't seem to find a definite answer for this question. I read somewhere that because of i9300 processor (samsung didn't reveal the codes or sth) the performance and battery life on Custom ROM based on AOSP and CM is not as satisfactory as Stock or Touch-wiz based roms.
Is this true? I love to use CM but the battery indeed seems to drain faster. Any idea of when i9300 users might get to use solid AOSP or CM based ROMs?
Thanks mates!
I am curious about this too. It seems that AOSP ROMS will always be imperfect as long as the Exynos codes arent released.
PAING1990 said:
Hi all,
I keep reading but I don't seem to find a definite answer for this question. I read somewhere that because of i9300 processor (samsung didn't reveal the codes or sth) the performance and battery life on Custom ROM based on AOSP and CM is not as satisfactory as Stock or Touch-wiz based roms.
Is this true? I love to use CM but the battery indeed seems to drain faster. Any idea of when i9300 users might get to use solid AOSP or CM based ROMs?
Thanks mates!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have messed around with a few ROMS (mainly sammy based one's) and using a SAMMY ROM with a new launcher is a strong base.
Why not start by finding a good sammy based ROM (i'm using Viking ROM although may switch to HyperLight) get a nice setup, then you can simply backup and mess with ASOP & CM yourself knowing you have a rock solid alternative to fall back on.
You can make up your own mind then ^^
PAING1990 said:
Hi all,
I keep reading but I don't seem to find a definite answer for this question. I read somewhere that because of i9300 processor (samsung didn't reveal the codes or sth) the performance and battery life on Custom ROM based on AOSP and CM is not as satisfactory as Stock or Touch-wiz based roms.
Is this true? I love to use CM but the battery indeed seems to drain faster. Any idea of when i9300 users might get to use solid AOSP or CM based ROMs?
Thanks mates!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cm10 is rock stable and has better battery life than sammy. (For me) but camera has some problems. Just try it. You can always revert it to sammy
themate1987 said:
Cm10 is rock stable and has better battery life than sammy. (For me) but camera has some problems. Just try it. You can always revert it to sammy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM10 is still nightly build right? I tried some ROMs like slimbean and liquid smooth but the battery performance is significantly not as good as stock. Am i right?
Yes right...
The stock ROM gives awesome battery life...
I tried CM10 but it seems to drain battery faster...i mean not that faster...
On my galaxy sl i9003 you cant even imagine what actually battery drain is....
Life 7hrs and gone but on my S3 the battery is OK about a day or day and a half and still 34% left !!
Sent from my Galaxy SL !! (Y)
simratcs said:
Yes right...
The stock ROM gives awesome battery life...
I tried CM10 but it seems to drain battery faster...i mean not that faster...
On my galaxy sl i9003 you cant even imagine what actually battery drain is....
Life 7hrs and gone but on my S3 the battery is OK about a day or day and a half and still 34% left !!
Sent from my Galaxy SL !! (Y)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wah. A day and a half??? I can't even achieve it with stock rom. What kind of tweaks do you use?
I just rooted a while ago and have just been flashing ROM this and that. Have never tried custom kernels or mods.
Would love to hear some tweaks that will last me 1.5 days with CM10. haha. Share with me bro.
If you can tolerate the few minor issues/glitches here and there, nothing beats CM10.
sidthegreatest said:
If you can tolerate the few minor issues/glitches here and there, nothing beats CM10.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
dualboot: the best solution
sidthegreatest said:
If you can tolerate the few minor issues/glitches here and there, nothing beats CM10.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
okay. So i do not need any kernel and tweaks for excellent battery life is it?
tried so often cm9&cm10, lately slimbean.
was AOSP fan on my desire, but not on the s3 (yet)
none of them made me stick to AOSP for more than 1week...
too many "bugs" - minor things who annoyed me like: **** camera&video (unstable), battery life, calling bugs (low voice volume) etc
ive to admit that slimbean + siyah kernel beats everything, the battery life is rly nice (nearly liek sammy roms). siyah kernel helps alot concerning the battery life on AOSP!
still ive to use a sammy rom cuz of stability and reliability.
id look forward to a fully working AOSP rom, hopefully soon.
themate1987 said:
Cm10 is rock stable and has better battery life than sammy. (For me) but camera has some problems. Just try it. You can always revert it to sammy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What good is a ROM that is stable (as in doesn't crash) but ISN'T fully functional (as in has issues w/ hardware) ?
I want a ROM that is both stable and fully functional, even if it isn't the benchmark champion.
For me, the stock ROMs offer the best of the 2 worlds: they are stable and functional.
Yeah, let the flame start, but I am yet to see an AOKP/AOSP/CM ROM that doesn't have a single issue with hardware.
So, stock ROMs for me are the winner.
I use NOVA Launcher Prime, BTW, but the TouchWiz that came with today's stock JB (France, XEF) is extremely fast and as customizable as Nova Launcher.
Simonetti2011 said:
What good is a ROM that is stable (as in doesn't crash) but ISN'T fully functional (as in has issues w/ hardware) ?
I want a ROM that is both stable and fully functional, even if it isn't the benchmark champion.
For me, the stock ROMs offer the best of the 2 worlds: they are stable and functional.
Yeah, let the flame start, but I am yet to see an AOKP/AOSP/CM ROM that doesn't have a single issue with hardware.
So, stock ROMs for me are the winner.
I use NOVA Launcher Prime, BTW, but the TouchWiz that came with today's stock JB (France, XEF) is extremely fast and as customizable as Nova Launcher.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is miui rom that offers sammy+miui experience. I think it's called rayglobe, but it's based on 4.0.4 so it is never as smooth as jb
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
I've been trying alot of ROM's for my Motorola Razr MAXX, and can't live without AOKP's ROM Control.
But i have a GSM phone and not all AOKP ROM's work on my phone.
I'm currently on "STOCK-JB-AOKP-Nov-22-2012-03.12.46-CrackTeam-Umts_Spyder",
and the Stock ROM "SPDREM_U_01.6.7.2-180_SPU-19-TA-11.6_SIGNEuropeAustraliaEMEA_USASPDRICSRTCEE_HWp2b_Service1FF_fastboot.xml.zip".
...
So ICS Stock and JB AOKP custom rom.
But i have major battery issues with it; battery lasts for less than 2 days. Compared to the original ROM which lasted like a week.
Right now i don't care if it's a JB, ICS, GB or whatever; i just want a ROM that's stable, that works and has long battery life.
Anyone reccomendations from the best community on the web?
Guess the best community on the web was busy, and i was left with you.
So, I came across a kernel that allowed dual-booting, and I was wondering if it's smart to make use of this feature? I saw that it takes up 3GB of internal space, and my S2 has 16...I'm currently running PACman ROM, and wanted to try out ChameleonOS while still keeping the former available for use. Would anyone like to help out with their opinions? Would performance and/or battery life be affected?
link to kernel page on xda
PS: I've checked, and the kernel is compatible with my ROM
No.
drfandroid said:
So, I came across a kernel that allowed dual-booting, and I was wondering if it's smart to make use of this feature? I saw that it takes up 3GB of internal space, and my S2 has 16...I'm currently running PACman ROM, and wanted to try out ChameleonOS while still keeping the former available for use. Would anyone like to help out with their opinions? Would performance and/or battery life be affected?
link to kernel page on xda
PS: I've checked, and the kernel is compatible with my ROM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
actually , u only got 10GB of about 16 GB , 6GB probally for ROM, i dont know why ,but when i flashed any rom , and checked my internal space , its only about 10~ 11 GB .
About dual-boot, there no needed to dual-boot , cause like Laptop, we can use 2 diffirent windows at the same time , but its a waste of time .
drfandroid said:
So, I came across a kernel that allowed dual-booting, and I was wondering if it's smart to make use of this feature? I saw that it takes up 3GB of internal space, and my S2 has 16...I'm currently running PACman ROM, and wanted to try out ChameleonOS while still keeping the former available for use. Would anyone like to help out with their opinions? Would performance and/or battery life be affected?
link to kernel page on xda
PS: I've checked, and the kernel is compatible with my ROM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why the heck not!!
I'm dual booting CM10-Skank (4.1.1) & MIUI V4 (4.0.3)
Siyah - 3 - v4.0.1
I like MIUI coz radio/call record/file explorer/music/themes - pretty much most of it...
But, I'm also really enjoying CM10-Skank!!
& now I can have both!! reboot and home button & I'm using MIUI (2nd rom)...
or just reboot and I'm using CM10-Skank...
Have a play & enjoy dual booting!
King_Rat said:
Why the heck not!!
I'm dual booting CM10-Skank (4.1.1) & MIUI V4 (4.0.3)
Siyah - 3 - v4.0.1
I like MIUI coz radio/call record/file explorer/music/themes - pretty much most of it...
But, I'm also really enjoying CM10-Skank!!
& now I can have both!! reboot and home button & I'm using MIUI (2nd rom)...
or just reboot and I'm using CM10-Skank...
Have a play & enjoy dual booting!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
haha, I'll give it a go then. Thanks :good: Has your device's overall performance been down at all??
drfandroid said:
haha, I'll give it a go then. Thanks :good: Has your device's overall performance been down at all??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yesterday I took ph off charger @ 7am in the morning. I still had 70% charge left @ 8pm. 2000mah battery & UV -25. Best JB battery life I've ever had. Plus cm10 skank 4.1.1 is as smooth as anything else I've used. Of course kernel+script(s)+tweaks help a bit.
NB, the camera in skank had the cm bug of black edges in view finder... Changed it out for 4.2 camera.
Sent from my GT-I9100 2x headed Hydra
King_Rat said:
Yesterday I took ph off charger @ 7am in the morning. I still had 70% charge left @ 8pm. 2000mah battery & UV -25. Best JB battery life I've ever had. Plus cm10 skank 4.1.1 is as smooth as anything else I've used. Of course kernel+script(s)+tweaks help a bit.
NB, the camera in skank had the cm bug of black edges in view finder... Changed it out for 4.2 camera.
Sent from my GT-I9100 2x headed Hydra
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Daul booting is very good for testing ROMs.I dual boot(see signature),because I like more AOSP based ROMs and their UI,but I also use MHL HDMI,for which I need Chameleon ROM.
@King_Rat: That's amazing battery life for a CM!
Thanks again to everyone, I'll do this tomorrow.
Sent from my HTC One
drfandroid said:
@King_Rat: That's amazing battery life for a CM!
Thanks again to everyone, I'll do this tomorrow.
Sent from my HTC One
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Combo of kernel+rom+extweaks settings I guess :good:
Skank roms are pretty solid, but not too flashy... I'll take battery life over bells & whistles 9x's outa 10