Is it possible to port Android Wear 2.0 from emulator image to a G Watch? A developer ported the ZenWatch 2 system to the Gear 2 Neo so it might be possible to port from LG Watch Urbane 2 LTE, remove all features that are not compatible (SIM, WiFi, etc...) and make a ROM for G Watch. Anyone with experience here?
Developer ab123321 has ported Android Wear 2.0 from the LG G Watch R to Dory: https://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=72738902&postcount=342
This thread is now discussion about Wear 2.0
konradit said:
Is it possible to port Android Wear 2.0 from emulator image to a G Watch? A developer ported the ZenWatch 2 system to the Gear 2 Neo so it might be possible to port from LG Watch Urbane 2 LTE, remove all features that are not compatible (SIM, WiFi, etc...) and make a ROM for G Watch. Anyone with experience here?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is definitely doable, just not sure how things work exactly with the watches as far as partitions go. Maybe some of the previous ROM devs on here can help out with that bit, I am new to supporting wear devices. If we can get the blobs ironed out it should be pretty easy, we should have part of a device tree from TWRP.
@DespairFactor Hi, nice to see you around here!
Do you have the G Watch? I can provide anything you need. I have 6.0.1 Wear, root (read only /system) and TWRP 3.0.2-0. Let's just wait for a square watch to receive N preview, or maybe port from emulator image? Most people believe the G Watch will not get updated due to not having a crown button, a crown button is crucial for Android Wear since it now acts as a back function, instead of the traditional swipe to left. Also the G Watch has now 3 major OS versions (KK, LP, MM) so it's not a surprise Google abandon it now, following Nexus update cycle. The watch is incredibly useful even after the years. @invisiblek made a very good kernel for G Watch, maybe he can help. As far as the partitions go, I will reply later with a command output.
Also I can make a little app to perform a back command using swipe to left gesture like most Android Wear unofficial launchers do
DespairFactor said:
This is definitely doable, just not sure how things work exactly with the watches as far as partitions go. Maybe some of the previous ROM devs on here can help out with that bit, I am new to supporting wear devices. If we can get the blobs ironed out it should be pretty easy, we should have part of a device tree from TWRP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
See my previous answer.
Here is everything about partitions: https://gist.github.com/KonradIT/e2372ac3d74e671a3e98e8d3ecb93676
System dump: (adb pulling, will upload later)
About porting from an emulator image, are there cases of stable ports from Android emulator? I have a square android wear 280x280 cloned G Watch emulator instance running Android Wear N, I can also upload it.
Google released N Wear Developer Preview for the Huawei Watch and LG G Watch Urbane 2gen LTE, both round watches. For the G watch, a square watch is needed. Google will probably release a developer image for Asus ZenWatch 2 or Sony Smartwatch 3 (or even Samsung Gear Live??) down the road. The Asus ZenWatch 1 also does not have a crown, making it less likely to receive Android Wear 2.0 N.
G Watch and ZenWatch 2 have pretty similar specs (same SoC, same graphics module, same RAM, same internal storage space):
G Watch: http://www.gsmarena.com/lg_g_watch_w100-7718.php
ZenWatch 2: http://www.gsmarena.com/asus_zenwatch_2_wi501q-7689.php
(G watch does not have a speaker btw, ZenWatch 2 does!)
Regarding TWRP, build here (it works wonders): http://forum.xda-developers.com/g-w...recovery-twrp-2-7-1-0-touch-recovery-t2827887
I personally love my G Watch a lot, looks like I'm not upgrading this year!
konradit said:
See my previous answer.
Here is everything about partitions: https://gist.github.com/KonradIT/e2372ac3d74e671a3e98e8d3ecb93676
System dump: (adb pulling, will upload later)
About porting from an emulator image, are there cases of stable ports from Android emulator? I have a square android wear 280x280 cloned G Watch emulator instance running Android Wear N, I can also upload it.
Google released N Wear Developer Preview for the Huawei Watch and LG G Watch Urbane 2gen LTE, both round watches. For the G watch, a square watch is needed. Google will probably release a developer image for Asus ZenWatch 2 or Sony Smartwatch 3 (or even Samsung Gear Live??) down the road. The Asus ZenWatch 1 also does not have a crown, making it less likely to receive Android Wear 2.0 N.
G Watch and ZenWatch 2 have pretty similar specs (same SoC, same graphics module, same RAM, same internal storage space):
G Watch: http://www.gsmarena.com/lg_g_watch_w100-7718.php
ZenWatch 2: http://www.gsmarena.com/asus_zenwatch_2_wi501q-7689.php
(G watch does not have a speaker btw, ZenWatch 2 does!)
Regarding TWRP, build here (it works wonders): http://forum.xda-developers.com/g-w...recovery-twrp-2-7-1-0-touch-recovery-t2827887
I personally love my G Watch a lot, looks like I'm not upgrading this year!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They generally will not expand the preview to other devices, they don't ever do it. Also, the OS likely has the images and stuff for the square devices in case others want to port it. I can see Sony doing it themselves and releasing it, but not ASUS. Regardless, I would need to pull apart the G watch system dump for vendor files and to rip apart the developer preview images to see what we can do with it. Chances are it'll take quite a bit of work, so I would be open to having others jump in to help out. Perhaps this should turn into a github org/hangouts chat.
DespairFactor said:
They generally will not expand the preview to other devices, they don't ever do it. Also, the OS likely has the images and stuff for the square devices in case others want to port it. I can see Sony doing it themselves and releasing it, but not ASUS. Regardless, I would need to pull apart the G watch system dump for vendor files and to rip apart the developer preview images to see what we can do with it. Chances are it'll take quite a bit of work, so I would be open to having others jump in to help out. Perhaps this should turn into a github org/hangouts chat.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you have the G Watch? I forgot my cradle and I am pushing the image via bluetooth, so it will take some hours. Any other partition you need? My emulator image is x86, download armeabi v7 now! (https://dl.google.com/android/repository/sys-img/android-wear/sysimg_wear_armeabi-v7a-N_r01.zip if anyone needs it)
konradit said:
Do you have the G Watch? I forgot my cradle and I am pushing the image via bluetooth, so it will take some hours. Any other partition you need? My emulator image is x86, download armeabi v7 now! (https://dl.google.com/android/repository/sys-img/android-wear/sysimg_wear_armeabi-v7a-N_r01.zip if anyone needs it)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do have one, I also have a Moto 360.
DespairFactor said:
This is definitely doable, just not sure how things work exactly with the watches as far as partitions go. Maybe some of the previous ROM devs on here can help out with that bit, I am new to supporting wear devices. If we can get the blobs ironed out it should be pretty easy, we should have part of a device tree from TWRP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
DespairFactor said:
I do have one, I also have a Moto 360.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cool, here is a folder with everything: https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B-CbH9Yv1OUWM2tHdGRtdkliSkE&usp=sharing
/armeabi-v7a are the Android Wear N emulator files
/G_Watch_port_armeabiv7.avd is a folder with settings from emulator which is similar to G Watch in terms of specs
/G_Watch_port_armeabiv7.ini is a file for emulator
/system_g_watch_mm.img is a system dump from G Watch with the latest Wear OS (MM)
So, what is left to start porting?
Gonna try my skills over there. Let's see what we can get with our lovely G Watch. @konradit there's as much info/files as we need I think. I'm starting porting this weekend.
konradit said:
Cool, here is a folder with everything: https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B-CbH9Yv1OUWM2tHdGRtdkliSkE&usp=sharing
/armeabi-v7a are the Android Wear N emulator files
/G_Watch_port_armeabiv7.avd is a folder with settings from emulator which is similar to G Watch in terms of specs
/G_Watch_port_armeabiv7.ini is a file for emulator
/system_g_watch_mm.img is a system dump from G Watch with the latest Wear OS (MM)
So, what is left to start porting?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will have to look when I can get acces to drive, I don't have access here
DespairFactor said:
I will have to look when I can get acces to drive, I don't have access here
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are the files useful? I am doing the swipe left to back app too.
bemolx said:
Gonna try my skills over there. Let's see what we can get with our lovely G Watch. @konradit there's as much info/files as we need I think. I'm starting porting this weekend.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice, please post updates here
konradit said:
Nice, please post updates here
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay, I will. No problem
you made my day if you can port it
I am hoping the LG G watch can be compatible with Android Wear 2.0.
ericdabbs said:
I am hoping the LG G watch can be compatible with Android Wear 2.0.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not supported, it has been discontinued: https://twitter.com/LGUSAMobile/status/735246368609083392
konradit said:
Not supported, it has been discontinued: https://twitter.com/LGUSAMobile/status/735246368609083392
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well you see it does say jk so I think he's joking.. And besides that doesn't mean anything
goast said:
Well you see it does say jk so I think he's joking.. And besides that doesn't mean anything
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe he/she was serious. I think JK is initials of the customer rep who wrote that reply.
xymic said:
I believe he/she was serious. I think JK is initials of the customer rep who wrote that reply.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well that's awesome. We all have opinions and are allowed to have them. Why wouldn't they include it? Because of one review that says something about a button? All software companies deny any info about updates, so nothing to see here.
DespairFactor said:
I will have to look when I can get acces to drive, I don't have access here
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any update on this?
Related
Anyone with a leaked image to try ?
Awww, this thread subject was exciting then the actual body of the OP was a disappointment.
Afaik there is absolutely nothing to leak.
Remix OS 3.0 has just been shown running on an arm device; so even if there was a copy of that ROM somewhere, it would be useless unless you also have that device (Remix Pro).
lol
I hope that if it is release for pc they might have fix the touch input on the surface pro lineup.
HypoTurtle said:
Afaik there is absolutely nothing to leak.
Remix OS 3.0 has just been shown running on an arm device; so even if there was a copy of that ROM somewhere, it would be useless unless you also have that device (Remix Pro).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Or (theoretically), a device with the same chipset.
However, by the time it was ported, RemixOS 3.0 may already get an official release.
wizmart said:
Anyone with a leaked image to try ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is for arm devices which is why the Android x86 port is not out yet.
I hope that 3.0 will be better then 2.0 in terms of bug fixes and comparability with more devices especially the surface pro 4 with the touch input. dual boot will be interesting on the SP4. AmiDuOS runs good but makes my pc SP4 run hot do to the CPU heavy usage. can't wait for the new release and news on it
while waiting for Remix 3.0 i went have a look at x86 6.0 rc1 witch i did install over an existing x86 4.4 (you're asked to upgrade or make a new install) it booted fine with all my settings, you do have multiwindow now except you can only have 2 or 4 windows at the same time not resizable and less compatible then remix, next i found my cpu and hd usage was too high, but the good is the settings panel is original to 6.0. Alltogether i'm back to remix on ext4 usb with swap part., it is running perfectly for me, no lags at all...
Sent from my Acer AOD255 using XDA Labs
Well, I expect development will be moving along much easier going forward. In case you missed it -- Jide Announced New Range of Android Devices & Hire Founder of Android-x86 Project
They've been very quiet since then. I think we're going to see something very big in this next update in terms of how well remix and x86 are married.
I just downloaded the latest test Chinese version . 401
Boy is it LOCKED DOWN
no root command line
no play store
Hopefully we will see something better when it is released
Sent from my on Z00A using XDA Labs
Main improvement appears to be keymapping...
Would love H264 codec enabled in latest build
Sent from my SGP621 using Tapatalk
lollyjay said:
I just downloaded the latest test Chinese version . 401
Boy is it LOCKED DOWN
no root command line
no play store
Hopefully we will see something better when it is released
Sent from my on Z00A using XDA Labs
Main improvement appears to be keymapping...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Was it Android 86 or ARM?
Knucklessg1 said:
Was it Android 86 or ARM?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's for the x86-64 architecture.
And here is a faster mirror, if anyone wishes to download.
https://mega.nz/#!9lkTWDiI!as99QTFGw2UYkFkHQWBVCX-pKpxkT7McLs27t-wfVHM
moriel5 said:
It's for the x86-64 architecture.
And here is a faster mirror, if anyone wishes to download.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you get the "Decryption Error" message like I did, in G-Chrome refresh the page, before you click download through browser, hit f12, select console and type in 'skipcheck=1', then hit enter. Should work then.
Skrychi said:
If you get the "Decryption Error" message like I did, in G-Chrome refresh the page, before you click download through browser, hit f12, select console and type in 'skipcheck=1', then hit enter. Should work then.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll keep that in mind, it should be the same for Firefox.
jaime4272 said:
I hope that if it is release for pc they might have fix the touch input on the surface pro lineup.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Touch works on my Surface Pro 3.
this is not remix os 3.0!!!!! what a load of cobblers! its only version 2.0.401. what a waste of time.
alz_uk said:
this is not remix os 3.0!!!!! what a load of cobblers! its only version 2.0.401. what a waste of time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Remix OS 3.0 doesn't exist yet.
So as i undderstand there is a speaker in the moto 360 2, and today i recieved an android wear update that listed speaker usage for calls and sounds as one of the changes, anyone figure out how to enable this on the watch?
AFAIK, the Moto 360 2015 does NOT have speakers...
From a quick google search:
https://motorola-global-portal.custhelp.com/app/answers/prod_answer_detail/a_id/107029/p/2815,9542
bossman137 said:
So as i undderstand there is a speaker in the moto 360 2, and today i recieved an android wear update that listed speaker usage for calls and sounds as one of the changes, anyone figure out how to enable this on the watch?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How exactly did you find out that there is a speaker, since there isn't any?
Sent from my ONDA A9 Core4 using Tapatalk
Pnevma said:
AFAIK, the Moto 360 2015 does NOT have speakers...
From a quick google search:
https://motorola-global-portal.custhelp.com/app/answers/prod_answer_detail/a_id/107029/p/2815,9542
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that is what the spec say, i haven't found any tear down (and i'm not willing to sacrifice my own) but i'm still curious what the slot below the microphone does?
Android Wear is completely independent from the Moto 360 2nd gen. It's just the app that allows ANY Android Wear device (Moto 360, LG Urbane, Huawei Watch, etc) to share information between the phone and device. That spec in the update was only referring to some sort of fix or tweak for those Android Wear devices who DO have speakers.
The Moto 360 2nd gen (and 1st gen) does not have built-in speakers, so this change in the update does not apply to our watches. Simply put, without a speaker, no update in the world could magically make your watch produce sound. Lol
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N910A using Tapatalk
willumpie82 said:
that is what the spec say, i haven't found any tear down (and i'm not willing to sacrifice my own) but i'm still curious what the slot below the microphone does?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since the band now connect to lugs instead of the phone body, that slot beneath the microphone is there to assist in opening the device. It is not a speaker outlet.
Besides, it would really be awkward to talk to a watch in public XD
I don't even use my phone on handsfree when in public.
I saw my brother do it a few times with his Apple Watch (phone conversation that is). It wasn't exactly clear and easy, but it wasn't terrible either.
If my watch had a speaker I'd probably use it in a pinch if I couldn't get my phone out right away or I was a maybe in a different room in my house. But then I'd probably only do it long enough to answer the call and tell the caller to hold on while I went to the other room to get my phone.
At work I usually have my BT headset on so I wouldn't use it then... well, except for days like today when I forgot to grab it, dangnabbit!
I'm really pissed of with Google, it seems that their ways to stop us from using what they doesn't want is by killing what we use...
My Nexus 5X already died into the bootloop issue, and today I've just seen that the Nexus 6P is having the exact same issue, which they say as a faulty hardware (Really? 2 completely different brands, with the EXACT SAME ISSUE? You must to be kidding me..).
This is not the first time that Google is killing what we use.
I'm a user of Miracast technology, since marshmallow it wasn't present, but you could activate via a build.prop tweak if you are rooted, in nougat they introduced a bug (yes, intentionally), that the phone will crash If you this tweak and connect to the tv, forcing me to buy their Chromecast 2.
This is not the only thing, have you ever wondered why the hell it doesn't has QI charging? To make us to use their "Fast charging USB C solution..
The Nexus 6 has also had something similar with it's notification LED, which can be activated only If rooted..
Now I really don't know what to do, I'm thinking of downgrading to Marshmallow before my phone got into bootloop, and not having another paper weight on my desk.
The only thing i can assure is that my next phone will be an Galaxy S8, and not another Google Crap phone.
rcoliveirajr said:
I'm really pissed of with Google, it seems that their ways to stop us from using what they doesn't want is by killing what we use...
My Nexus 5X already died into the bootloop issue, and today I've just seen that the Nexus 6P is having the exact same issue, which they say as a faulty hardware (Really? 2 completely different brands, with the EXACT SAME ISSUE? You must to be kidding me..).
This is not the first time that Google is killing what we use.
I'm a user of Miracast technology, since marshmallow it wasn't present, but you could activate via a build.prop tweak if you are rooted, in nougat they introduced a bug (yes, intentionally), that the phone will crash If you this tweak and connect to the tv, forcing me to buy their Chromecast 2.
This is not the only thing, have you ever wondered why the hell it doesn't has QI charging? To make us to use their "Fast charging USB C solution..
The Nexus 6 has also had something similar with it's notification LED, which can be activated only If rooted..
Now I really don't know what to do, I'm thinking of downgrading to Marshmallow before my phone got into bootloop, and not having another paper weight on my desk.
The only thing i can assure is that my next phone will be an Galaxy S8, and not another Google Crap phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So that's why Miracast no longer works. ?
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
I agree. It is getting ridiculous. All of the reasons we love the Nexus line are becoming blurry. Miracast is a huge one. Smart tv, Xbox One, and now I have to have a damn Chromecast as well. I'm starting to feel like Apple users must feel. Poor souls.
I don't understand. My Miracast works perfectly fine with Panasonic TVs and LG.
mihovil13 said:
I don't understand. My Miracast works perfectly fine with Panasonic TVs and LG.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you on stock 7.1? Also did you enabled in build.prop and it worked?
My device won't work with my Samsung TV JS7200 or Windows 10 Miracast receiver.
rcoliveirajr said:
Are you on stock 7.1? Also did you enabled in build.prop and it worked?
My device won't work with my Samsung TV JS7200 or Windows 10 Miracast receiver.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am on stock 7.0.1 (latest). I didn't change anything in build.prop. I just go to Settings -> Display -> Cast
I've read online that it works with older Miracast (first, second gen) TVs. For e.g. it works with Roku 3 but not 4.
rcoliveirajr said:
This is not the only thing, have you ever wondered why the hell it doesn't has QI charging? To make us to use their "Fast charging USB C solution..
.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Given that the 6P has a metal build and that no other metal phones(from the top of my head) have Qi charging, I would assume it was due to the the metal build. And in regards to saying that they are just trying to sell "Fast Charging USB C solution", wouldn't you think that they would generate more revenue from implementing a convenient way to charge a phone?
Based on your opinion and what you had said, it sounds like the S8 is the perfect device for you. It's so great to have a plethora of device choices!
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
richii0207 said:
Given that the 6P has a metal build and that no other metal phones(from the top of my head) have Qi charging, I would assume it was due to the the metal build. And in regards to saying that they are just trying to sell "Fast Charging USB C solution", wouldn't you think that they would generate more revenue from implementing a convenient way to charge a phone?
Based on your opinion and what you had said, it sounds like the S8 is the perfect device for you. It's so great to have a plethora of device choices!
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, my dead Nexus 5X has a plastic body and Google removed QI Charger from it too, something I found really useful, which I was using since Nexus 4 and had to stop on the new ones..
mihovil13 said:
I am on stock 7.0.1 (latest). I didn't change anything in build.prop. I just go to Settings -> Display -> Cast
I've read online that it works with older Miracast (first, second gen) TVs. For e.g. it works with Roku 3 but not 4.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh, didn't know that.
But I totally understand you.
Google played a "good guy" comparing to Apple for a few years now, and I really saw this coming. Basically they're just the same. Profit, profit, profit.
You want to cast? Buy a Chromecast.
I really wouldn't be surprised if their Project Fi gains success, and they decide to lock their future devices to their own network.
Nokia years ago was really something else, but it was in the way of the American capitalism so they had to remove it from their perfect market picture.
mihovil13 said:
I am on stock 7.0.1 (latest). I didn't change anything in build.prop. I just go to Settings -> Display -> Cast
I've read online that it works with older Miracast (first, second gen) TVs. For e.g. it works with Roku 3 but not 4.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can confirm that miracast works on my Roku 3. I am stock 7.1.1. not rooted.
I upgraded my PC to Asus i7-6700HQ Skylake laptop with 12 gb ram and nvidia 960m VGA. Ubuntu and most GNU linux OSs don't work easily and will usually fail due to the nvidia card not supported by nouveau. OSX has its own headache and never booted to installer. The only non windows OS that runs very good out of the box on my laptop is Remix OS By just adding EXTMOD=i915 it totally ignored the nvidia card and work pretty fast. I have a very powerful android box and it's good for studying, office work, youtubing and even GAMING
Remix OS is relatively new yet it did well to work on most of the new chips which didn't perform well on normal linux. What happened for now? Did the development really stop? Do they need donations (WE ARE HERE READY )? Did they give up on their port to normal PCs? They gave hope to many clinically dead old PCs and a better experience to new touch laptops like mine.
Phoenix OS is good but it has many Chinese stuff and their UI isn't as clean as that of Remix OS
What can we do to get Remix OS development back? The latest version 3.0.207 works pretty well on my PC but I'm still looking for more I want Nougat for example, I want better support for my fn keyboard shortcuts, I want support for keyboard backlight. I want better file explorer. Your latest version is awesome but we still expect more from you guys at Jide. Please don't give up!
Wait 'openthos' stable release
You have 3 options
1-) Phoenix OS
2-) Openthos
3-) Chromium os based build with arc++ (like flintos)
I have flintos but couldn't install Android apps. It supports them? How?
modaifallah said:
I have flintos but couldn't install Android apps. It supports them? How?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL Not yet, but it is in their main goal so it will be added. I don't know when.
It would be great if anyone make chromium os with arc++
I had hope with Neverware cloudready. I don't know if Chromium OS is coming with Android apps support any soon. They can't distribute the android part easily as it's not open source. And they can't give us something like gapps to flash as there is no clear way to make such a big modification to the OS from the user's side. I have faith in Remix OS, they may be dead now but they are coming soon I hope.
modaifallah said:
I had hope with Neverware cloudready. I don't know if Chromium OS is coming with Android apps support any soon. They can't distribute the android part easily as it's not open source. And they can't give us something like gapps to flash as there is no clear way to make such a big modification to the OS from the user's side. I have faith in Remix OS, they may be dead now but they are coming soon I hope.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can check 'Remix OS Game EDITION'
https://forum.xda-developers.com/remix/remix-os/game-edition-remix-os-pc-game-edition-t3566010
I think it's latest original release and currently i'm using it. It's better then other versions espacially 3.xxx, it still best choice untill someone making good thing
Yeah, remix os is good but it can be better
arcsnim said:
LOL Not yet, but it is in their main goal so it will be added. I don't know when.
It would be great if anyone make chromium os with arc++
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
arcsnim said:
You can check 'Remix OS Game EDITION'
https://forum.xda-developers.com/remix/remix-os/game-edition-remix-os-pc-game-edition-t3566010
I think it's latest original release and currently i'm using it. It's better then other versions espacially 3.xxx, it still best choice untill someone making good thing
Yeah, remix os is good but it can be better
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What about you trying this????
https://forum.xda-developers.com/android/software/x86-bliss-x86-pc-s-t3534657
This is pure android nougat for pcs with multiwindow support :')
modaifallah said:
What about you trying this????
https://forum.xda-developers.com/android/software/x86-bliss-x86-pc-s-t3534657
This is pure android nougat for pcs with multiwindow support :')
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually it doesn't have special multiwindow support, it uses *standart app on google play to use multiwindow so you can get on any android 7.x versions
I don't like it, if you try it you can understand what i mean, espacially try multi window, i don't want to tell bad thing about that...
I will try and give feesback. Wil also suggest any other alternatives I get to know. Thanks!
arcsnim said:
Actually it doesn't have special multiwindow support, it uses *standart app on google play to use multiwindow so you can get on any android 7.x versions
I don't like it, if you try it you can understand what i mean, espacially try multi window, i don't want to tell bad thing about that...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It didn't even boot xD
modaifallah said:
It didn't even boot xD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I feel worthless ? Remix OS works well for me more than the majority of the users so I'm sticking to it till something happens xD
aaaaaaandd, 'anbox', have anyone use this?
http://anbox.io/
arcsnim said:
aaaaaaandd, 'anbox', have anyone use this?
http://anbox.io/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Trying now
I've spoken to Remix OS Project Manager and they still don't have plans for an update yet. No resources. Too many projects on their head
Ye, I also wanna try out Anbox. Seems very promising.
Worst news I could hear today :'(
This will give better chance for competitors to rise. They have diluted their effort into a larger work. They would have better focused on Remix OS and selling it in normal x86 convertibles.
*duplicate post*
Vioner said:
I've spoken to Remix OS Project Manager and they still don't have plans for an update yet. No resources. Too many projects on their head
Ye, I also wanna try out Anbox. Seems very promising.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can anbox run games?
if so, who needs remix os then
http://anbox.io/
As for Remix OS. They pull the plug.
Dunard said:
http://anbox.io/
As for Remix OS. They pull the plug.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Has anyone tried this yet?
I'd like to know if it has the same or better performance than Remix OS. Specially on streaming apps. I'd like a solution that can stream smooth like Shield Android TV does but using a computer or Laptop.
So far Remix OS has great performance on the laptop I'm trying it. I also did some build.prop tweaks and I'm using a TV launcher and it sure does compare to my Shield Android TV, however it still does not play some streaming videos as smooth as the Shield Android TV does, it can't handle some 1080P videos in YouTube for example, the SATV can handle 4K. Some streaming apps like DirecTV stutter on the video where the SATV plays them more smooth. Then again, I guess it could be the hardware I'm using. However compatibility using Remix OS is a lot better than using Android TV OS.
Hi at all,
last time I've been looking for alternatives of the official pokemon go plus product (it's a hardware ball to catch the pokemon more easy). I found inofficial products called "go-tcha". It's a bracelet which is connected with bluetooth to your smartphone like the original one.
This product works (on my opinion) on a simple xiamo mi band 1,2,3,4. So why this software could not work on a more powerful device like the stratos watch?
Is there any developer who want to create a new project or having a solution to creative such a software/apk (not the game itself) for our smartwatches to safe the hardware-money from the pokeball/bracelet?
Maybe this will help?
https://youtu.be/fSadF21FtLI
Sent from my MI 6 using Tapatalk
Not possible.
I actually tried to get emulation of a Gotcha / Go Plus working on the Stratos, but Android doesn't support the required mimicing of the UUIDs for BLE to work. Even if it did, there's no way to generate an official UUID like the Gotchas have, as they've never disclosed how they do it.
Quinny899 said:
Not possible.
I actually tried to get emulation of a Gotcha / Go Plus working on the Stratos, but Android doesn't support the required mimicing of the UUIDs for BLE to work. Even if it did, there's no way to generate an official UUID like the Gotchas have, as they've never disclosed how they do it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What about tweaking the game app too?
GreatApo said:
What about tweaking the game app too?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Native code. Also PoGo uses SafetyNet pretty heavily so it probably wouldn't like even messing with the Java
I am not a developer but how the producer of brook- and gotcha did it? they aren't an official part of pokemon.
SM26 said:
Maybe this will help?
https://youtu.be/fSadF21FtLI
Sent from my MI 6 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It seems that it is no longer being developed. :/
dan!eL said:
I am not a developer but how the producer of brook- and gotcha did it? they aren't an official part of pokemon.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I already said, they've never disclosed their method.
The 'Gotcha' devices they have access to the low level firmware, they don't run Android, so they can emulate whatever they want.
Quinny899 said:
I already said, they've never disclosed their method.
The 'Gotcha' devices they have access to the low level firmware, they don't run Android, so they can emulate whatever they want.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh :/