I Just got an update:
Build-number:
MWD59
Android Wear:
1.5.0.2923607
Android security patch level:
May 1 2016
Nice! it seems the wear version and build number got updated.
【Version】
MWD59,MWD48B
【Model Name】
ZenWatch 2
【Release Date】
2016/06/021
【Release Note】
1.Improve the quality of display
2.Improve the stability of connection
3.Fix security vulnerabilities ( Update to May 2016 of Android Security Bulletins )
4.Improve sleep tracking
5.Peek card is set to enabled in ASUS default watch face. Notification will be always shown in normal and ambient modes
How to update your ZenWatch:
Settings > About > System updates > System will download the update file and start the system update.
Important notice:
1. Please make sure your mobile phone can reach internet.
2. Please make sure mobile phone and ZenWatch are connected and stay close to each other during the update.
3. Please make sure ZenWatch is in charge status during the update.
4. Please be patient and aware of that update time will depend on the quality of internet access.
5. After update finished, system will restart automatically. Please check the version via “Settings > About > Build number”.
Sweet, thanks for the release notes
Waiting for flashable file to do adb sideload
Sent from my ASUS_T00F using XDA-Developers mobile app
It looks like a small update, but the interface is now extremely smooth
Version 1.4 was very stuttering while using the settings, even after 10 times factory reset.
There are some new watchfaces, and the translation in settings is also a bit better.
Took me a 3 a 4 factory resets to get this update, but it is worth it.
rsnel said:
It looks like a small update, but the interface is now extremely smooth
Version 1.4 was very stuttering while using the settings, even after 10 times factory reset.
There are some new watchfaces, and the translation in settings is also a bit better.
Took me a 3 a 4 factory resets to get this update, but it is worth it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't suppose ambient has been improved? Low-bit ambient is just terrible. My only real issue with the watch.
49mm OTA
https://android.googleapis.com/pack.../43265f8630f6a01c1e822ca2afe34abbec8dea22.zip
Got the update now.
NKernel works, rootable, TWRP tethered works on big Zenwatch 2.
delete
addition....
something is preventing deep sleep.
lost 50% battery with screen off at night...
€dit:
Its probably NKernel...
I will try an OTA.
r0tati0n said:
addition....
something is preventing deep sleep.
lost 50% battery with screen off at night...
€dit:
Its probably NKernel...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good to know, I was going to try flashing nKernel since I tried momentum and it seems to break wrist gestures, although it could possibly be something else breaking them on my device
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
Sideloaded the ota zip everything seems fine :laugh:
Its definitly NKernel, battery feels normal on stock kernel.
r0tati0n said:
Its definitly NKernel, battery feels normal on stock kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Battery is draining fast for me on momentum so it looks like we'll be stuck with stock until the kernels are updated
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
Newest release is rootable, NKernel does not go to deep sleep. (Neither does Momentum apparently)
Kernel Adiutor is installable, standard tweakable settings.
Only one core active at stock, all 4 cores can be made active.
Frequencies 600 and 787 MHz, no Hotplug.
Governors available: ondemand (active), userspace, powersave, performance.
Thermal, GPU, IO Scheduler, LMK, Virtual Mem, Network Protocol is tweakable on stock kernel in Adiutor.
Stock kernel feels way more snappy than in older releases (I did uninstall some apps though), one core wit 787 seems to be as fast as 2 cores with 600 MHz Max in previous MM.
+1 for stock being snappier!
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
After this new update, my battery is draining fast. Poor update.
Is someone else also facing this problem?
charming.arpit said:
After this new update, my battery is draining fast. Poor update.
Is someone else also facing this problem?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If your have a custom kernel installed it will drain the battery. You have to run stock kernel until Asus posts new source and kernels are updated.
Other than that battery seems to be good for anyone who's taken the update
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
Related
Ok so im rooted and overclocked and was using setcpu then decided i wanna try something different so i tried system tuner! When i checked the cpu it said that one of the processors are off line! Then i pressed the info button and sure enough it says only reading one! So i went through the settings and found force both cores online!
Since then i have no lag and virtually no checkerboarding on the web! Anyway i was just wondering if im the only one who noticed this and maybe it could help those who say that they are still getting lag on they're roms using dag's kernel!
Also i hope devs will notice this thread since i can't post there yet and take advantage of this how ever they can!
Now don't quote me on this but most likely the second core only turns on for processor intensive activities such as high graphics games or multiple programs running at once. I do find it hard to believe that it would be totally disabled. Most likely this is done to conserve battery.
blitzer320 said:
Now don't quote me on this but most likely the second core only turns on for processor intensive activities such as high graphics games or multiple programs running at once. I do find it hard to believe that it would be totally disabled. Most likely this is done to conserve battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope i checked that i had 10 apps open two were games (dead space and gta III) One cpu online even on performance! I see 50 views i hope others chime in and let us know what you are thinking
Btw they Did this i heard to the galaxy nexus with the tiomap 1.2 so we'll see what others find
truth77 said:
Nope i checked that i had 10 apps open two were games (dead space and gta III) One cpu online even on performance! I see 50 views i hope others chime in and let us know what you are thinking
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay if this really is the case I could also see at&t disabling the second core totally to save battery because of lte but i guess it will take a dev that has more experience with how qualcomm's multicore cpus work in android. report back with differences in battery life like how much faster does it drain now that both cores are forced on.
if you want both cores on click on boot settings and enable force all cpus online. that heats up your phone and eats more battery though+I do not see any benefits doing that.
blitzer320 said:
Okay if this really is the case I could also see at&t disabling the second core totally to save battery because of lte but i guess it will take a dev that has more experience with how qualcomm's multicore cpus work in android. report back with differences in battery life like how much faster does it drain now that both cores are forced on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've had it like this for 4 days on average i will take of the charger at 8am now is 8:30pm and i have 27% but i use my navigation for my Job! By 10:30 or so ill have 15% and recharge!
Settings
1836 max
192 min
Governer
Smartassv2
Both cores pushing
Screen off
192 max
In call
384 max
Tomorrow ill post some pics of battery life usage!
And my phone doesn't get any hotter than normal not even while using my navi! Mostly it just gives no lag and better rendering in the browser/maps/etc!!
I was under the impression that Gingerbread didn't fully utilize multiple cores. Need HC or ICS...
Broken said:
I was under the impression that Gingerbread didn't fully utilize multiple cores. Need HC or ICS...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same, but having a better processor helps. Like exynos. I bet once we update to ics if it ever happens, the differences will be only minor between processors, as it runs so nice.
Got system tuner pro, and it shows speed bars on both cpus running? I didn't change a thing?
canecbr600 said:
Got system tuner pro, and it shows speed bars on both cpus running? I didn't change a thing?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really? I switched Roms twice today and had to reset that each time! Cpu.0 online Cpu.1 offline! Like i said am i the only one? Lets hear from more people and let us know of any lag or rendering changes after turning on both cpu's! Battery too, i'll post mine tomorrow.
I thought I'd play and I have CPU0 running and CPU1 running.
truth77 said:
Btw they Did this i heard to the galaxy nexus with the tiomap 1.2 so we'll see what others find
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not entirely true.. the Galaxy Nexus has a kernel governor that turns one core off when the SCREEN IS OFF, but not when the phone is being used. Multiple kernel creators have since implemented this into their kernels. It is called "hot plugging" and it just turns CPU 1 offline when the screen is off and turns it back on when the screen is on
Sent from my DROID3 using xda premium
Just checked mine, rooted and OC with DaG's 0.1 version (first version). When I looked, it said the second CPU was offline. Changed it to online, we'll see how that impacts battery life.
How much of an advantage is smartassv2 anyway?
I just tried this with system tuner and both cpus were working but wone was of and on and zero was always on.
I am running stock rooted. If you just sit yhere and watch it you will see tje sevond core fires and shuts down alot.
truth77 said:
Really? I switched Roms twice today and had to reset that each time! Cpu.0 online Cpu.1 offline! Like i said am i the only one? Lets hear from more people and let us know of any lag or rendering changes after turning on both cpu's! Battery too, i'll post mine tomorrow.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same for me (CPU 0 on, CPU1 off, most times) and I'll say I have noticed no real changes in functionality (speed, rendering, etc) or battery life...
I guess jury is still out or is this a YMMV kind of thing?
I installed system runner and watched the cpus. One was on and the other kicked in periodically
Mine said it was offline as well. Forced it on and am not noticing any difference in speed or temp.
Ill leave it like this to test it further.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk
Do you have to be rooted to force both cores on?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
g2theno said:
Do you have to be rooted to force both cores on?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As far as I know yes you must have super user permission to alter such system activities
I don't know why everyone is in such a rush to force the second core online, it turns on and off when it needs to.
First off, I want to start this with saying I try most all the new phones as they come out.
I have found after clearing caches, factory resets, etc...that this phone is a little laggy sometimes.
Just scrolling through the OS, little jitters here and there.
Is it just because of the age of the CPU? I was thinking with Oxygen being close to stock, that the 801 would be fine, but I am catching some lag sometimes.
I have used the Nexus 5x, 6p, and OPT to compare and yes, I know those are flagship phones and have more powerful cpus, but just wondering if the little lags are just due to the cpu in this phone.
thanks
Same experience here. I think you must be right about the cpu
Sent from my ONE E1003 using Tapatalk
Try switch on battery saving mode, you will see how fast this phone can be.
oloczeka said:
Try switch on battery saving mode, you will see how fast this phone can be.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Opposite? Battery saver turns it slow na
oloczeka said:
Try switch on battery saving mode, you will see how fast this phone can be.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What?
Happens for me since OTA 2.1.3
Just revert to 2.1.2 and it's all butter smooth again
Problem lies within oxygen os. 801 is one of the best chips out there. Just wait for custom roms to be stable and ditch oxygen asap.
oloczeka said:
Try switch on battery saving mode, you will see how fast this phone can be.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Battery saver only leaves on essential phone activities and turn off/lower everything is else. CPU clock, animations and other radios, correct??
I just turned off all animations and only been using LTE a good amount of the time. Only lag ive seen is when I open an app, then go to home screen to open another app. A few seconds after the first app opened finally launches then the second app. This was intentional for testing
One thing is for sure, oxygen os still needs to be refined but really good for daily usage.
Since I received so many inquires into how I chose to save a moderate volume of battery power via trial and error, I decided to write up a little "this is what has worked for me" post.
First off, like I said, "this is what has worked for me," so I'm not held accountable if you manage to kcuf up your phone...cool? Ok.
Second, I take no credit in the development, research, exploits and other such methods used to obtain the following masterpieces of Android Development: Kernel Auduitor's devs, @klabit87 for his awesome work and support (as well as those who preceded his work), and @stang5litre for a brilliant ROM (v3) that allows such flexibility.
Now...keep in mind battery life greatly depends on what apps you have and frequent, location, sleep patterns...basically how you use your device. Ok, enough blabbering...
Once you have followed the instructions from http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=3321587 to a tee you must first read and study how each governor/io is structured and why.
Here are the basic parameters I'm running:
*Version 1 Configuration
Governor = darkness
I/O = fiops
Multi-core Powersaving = Aggressive
MP Decision = off
TCP Congestion Algorithm = reno*
Entropy - Read = 1024
Write = 2048
Low Memory = Aggressive
And I pulled the VFS Cache Pressure down to 5 in Virtual Memory.
Here are the basic parameters I'm running:
*Version 2 Configuration
Governor = alucard
I/O (Internal) = fiops
(External) = vr
Multi-core Powersaving = Disabled
MP Decision = off
*Thermal = SoC Temperature Throttle*
TCP Congestion Algorithm = cubic
Entropy - Read = 256
Write = 1024
Low Memory = Medium
Return VFS Cache Pressure to its default value of 10 in Virtual Memory
In addition to all of that, I use Greenify, Recently, Coolify and various native settings (i.e. Auto-bright -3, screen timeout, no transition animations).
The Version 2 Configuration is a great, harmonically balanced tapestry of performance and energy conservation.
I have tested this particular set-up fairly extensively, with a little tweaking along the way. And I feel that this is the optimal configuration, given the parameters. You guys may wanna play a little bit with the Entropy, because I did so and am still playing with it just to see what kind of performance I can achieve.
Below are a few screenshots of my set up (Version 1 Config).
Screenshots for Version 2 Config http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=66528774&postcount=15
Device: SCH-I545
ROM: stang5litre 5.0 Edition v3
Bootloader: NK4
System: OC1
Xposed: v65 _ Version3.0Alpha4
**NOTE: You WILL have to play around a bit to find out what works best for your style of use.
*EVERY DEVICE/EXPERIENCE METHOD WILL BE DIFFERENT!
***UPDATE: I have discovered that setting TCP Congestion Algorithm to reno has a *POSSIBLE* negative effect on battery life over a certain period of time (1 week to be approximate). I've specifically related this to streaming content on YouTube via background playback (Red or Xposed).
*Thermal* PLEASE READ! I did encounter and record abnormally high temperatures when this setting was set to Core Control.
Feel free to post info, screenshots or feedback that document your device's performance!
Sent from my stang5litre Edition 5.0 using Tapatalk
How yo setting gpu, thermal and low memory killer
3link22 said:
How yo setting gpu, thermal and low memory killer
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Core control only for thermal..And Aggressive for low memory killer
Sent from my stang5litre Edition 5.0 using Tapatalk
ATGkompressor said:
Core control only for thermal..And Aggressive for low memory killer
Sent from my stang5litre Edition 5.0 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CPU like this or no..
3link22 said:
CPU like this or no..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can't get the link
Sent from my stang5litre Edition 5.0 using Tapatalk
hey bruh can you pls tell me how to fix the wifi ? i flashed the kernel without problem but can you give me more instruction how to properly flash via ff maybe i do some mistakes ? my wifi doesnt work .. any help ??? : S my firmware is also OF1
Samsung love said:
hey bruh can you pls tell me how to fix the wifi ? i flashed the kernel without problem but can you give me more instruction how to properly flash via ff maybe i do some mistakes ? my wifi doesnt work .. any help ??? : S my firmware is also OF1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm on NK4 bootloader with OC1 system, so I'm not sure exactly what could be causing a Wi-Fi issue. If u go to the thread I linked in the OP, you should use the search function to search "Wi-Fi" and read thru them. Also, what ROM are u running? That could have something to do with it as well. If I recall correctly, I saw where someone had the same issue. Always make sure you follow the instructions and deviate not one iota of them.
Sent from my stang5litre Edition 5.0 using Tapatalk
ATGkompressor said:
I'm on NK4 bootloader with OC1 system, so I'm not sure exactly what could be causing a Wi-Fi issue. If u go to the thread I linked in the OP, you should use the search function to search "Wi-Fi" and read thru them. Also, what ROM are u running? That could have something to do with it as well. If I recall correctly, I saw where someone had the same issue. Always make sure you follow the instructions and deviate not one iota of them.
Sent from my stang5litre Edition 5.0 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well there was eitehr an instruction he just said *flash those kernels via FF* and i toke exactly the same firmware i had also for the OF1 and there was writen that this is fixing the Wifi ... it is not cause the roms i tried in both also stock and custom same ****t .. i had Oc1 system to ... your lucker but bruh if you search there woult be any type of devices but not for the s4 verizon it alll different hardware right ? i dont think i coult fix it in other way only if someon coult give me an advice or an well instruction on how to flash those kernels for the OF1 and how they got work it with a *working wifi* ofc but thanks for your reply appreciate it if someon coult help me woala
I will be updating the OP in a few days! I have discovered an awesome new set-up (I HOPE!). This one is performance driven and it has made a HUGE difference in network performance, as well as great multitasking performance. But it has a very small impact on battery life, given the aggressiveness of the CPU scaling. Stay tuned!
Sent from my stang5litre Edition 5.0 using Tapatalk
ATGkompressor said:
I will be updating the OP in a few days! I have discovered an awesome new set-up (I HOPE!). This one is performance driven and it has made a HUGE difference in network performance, as well as great multitasking performance. But it has a very small impact on battery life, given the aggressiveness of the CPU scaling. Stay tuned!
Sent from my stang5litre Edition 5.0 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How long now?
XxD34THxX said:
How long now?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Couple days. I need to have a high degree of certainty that these settings hold up thru a wide spectrum of variable situations. So...it is my opinion that this set up delivers a very harmonic balance of performance and battery life with impeccable stability. I've still got a few things I wanna test before I give the verdict. But I'll give a little clue, two actually...alucard and entropy.
Sent from my stang5litre Edition 5.0 using Tapatalk
ATGkompressor said:
Couple days. I need to have a high degree of certainty that these settings hold up thru a wide spectrum of variable situations. So...it is my opinion that this set up delivers a very harmonic balance of performance and battery life with impeccable stability. I've still got a few things I wanna test before I give the verdict. But I'll give a little clue, two actually...alucard and entropy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Argh fine make us wait >.<
Jk take your time. I'm just running your current config with my CPU only going up to 11-whatever
I had the Wi-Fi problem too, but a reboot fixed it. Something might not have applied correctly I'm guessing.
Actually it would make sense if it had to do with TCP, because Wi-Fi was fine until I messed with it.
whowatchlist said:
I had the Wi-Fi problem too, but a reboot fixed it. Something might not have applied correctly I'm guessing.
Actually it would make sense if it had to do with TCP, because Wi-Fi was fine until I messed with it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I had some issues with mobile data signal dropping randomly with the algorithm set to reno. But as far as the kernel modules, I've not one problem.
I'm getting ready to update the OP with this new configuration. Should be up within the hour.
Sent from my stang5litre Edition 5.0 using XDA Labs
Sorry guys, someone or thing doesn't want to co-operate with how I want my OP strutured, So, here are the Screenshots for Version 2 Config. As well as some shots from Better Battery Stats as comfirmation of the type of insane battery live I'm achieving.
So I might have messed up somewhere, but immediately after applying your new config, my device experienced multiple, constant freezes, and up until half and hour ago and before a full wipe, loss of bluetooth... No clue how the bluetooth is related... I'll try it again after this final
XxD34THxX said:
So I might have messed up somewhere, but immediately after applying your new config, my device experienced multiple, constant freezes, and up until half and hour ago and before a full wipe, loss of bluetooth... No clue how the bluetooth is related... I'll try it again after this final
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ooo. Not good. Don't see any reason why it would be doing all that. Are u running in Global mode or LTE/CDMA? I had to switch from global to lte because I was having data drops. But they only occurred at work at a certain time of the day. Also, a good FlashFire backup and a Rom reinstall works wonders. I been running stang's v3 since beginning of February and have put it thru the ringer. App installs/uninstalls, bootloops, and all that. Write possibly the most stable Rom and kernel set up I've ever ran. .
Sent from my stang5litre Edition 5.0 using XDA Labs
Good battery saving for ultra note5 please...
3link22 said:
Good battery saving for ultra note5 please...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since I'm not on that ROM, it would be at least a month before I could give any assessment and positive results. If you have tried both methods on Ultra N5 and are not satisfied, play around with it...I explicitly advocate for ppl to play around according to the base parameters I set forth, or even completely different templates. 9 times out of 10, battery life is relative to the user's style of use, as well as what modifications [emphasis on Xposed] you may be implementing.
Sent from my stang5litre Edition 5.0 using XDA Labs
ATGkompressor said:
Ooo. Not good. Don't see any reason why it would be doing all that. Are u running in Global mode or LTE/CDMA? I had to switch from global to lte because I was having data drops. But they only occurred at work at a certain time of the day. Also, a good FlashFire backup and a Rom reinstall works wonders. I been running stang's v3 since beginning of February and have put it thru the ringer. App installs/uninstalls, bootloops, and all that. Write possibly the most stable Rom and kernel set up I've ever ran. .
Sent from my stang5litre Edition 5.0 using XDA Labs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I'm on V3 as well... No clue atm since my phone is dead(just heavy gaming while my new drivers install)
]Finally is here. Marshmallow 26.3.A.0.131 update bring us so wanted improvements.
Here you can post your thoughts, performance reports, or possible bugs you may found.
First what get better:
1. Overall performance - is so smooth, every menu scroll fast.
2. Camera - i can't confirm, seems little bit better
3. WIFI - Wow so much better, before i was trying couple times until get connected, now is instant.
4. Actual perfomance - I make test with Antutu, Asphalt etc. Is much, much better. Antutu score on Android 5 was around 29 k and 30 k max. Marshmallow wake the beast and score now is 32 k. Asphalt 8 is playable on medium settings, before very low settings was only way to play it normal. Do you know why? CPU isn't limited anymore 4 cores on 1.46 Ghz and 0.8 Ghz for the second 4 cores.
What wasn't fix, or improve:
Apps opening time
Overheating is same as before
Low storage
More perfomance needed
Sites loading is slow as before
I found two bugs, the one bug is in the dialer the letters under the numbers are repositioned a little bit, and idk if this is a bug but the status bar doesn't take the color of the app you are using
nrokos said:
...
and idk if this is a bug but the status bar doesn't take the color of the app you are using
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it's called "feature", you may want to try What's New (Play Store) themes if you'd like colourful status-bar. It looks like that stock themes prefer black status bars now.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/cro...ix-stock-mm-themes-black-statues-bar-t3392565
Seems to be a bug, Detect USB device does not make sense without OTG.
The update is fine but a little bit disappointed specially on performance, apps are still opening very slow although UI is faster, at least now we have a better multitasking performance and no more bugs on RAM.
I had about 35k score in Antutu so MM sucks.
Mobile Data got buggy for me, didn't work until restart. Guys what happening with the Speaker it was so loud before now is very reduced i check settings nothing to about it.
depressed_ said:
I had about 35k score in Antutu so MM sucks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have 35k on MM... E2303 Model.
Performance will always be the same coz of the ****ty chipset thats inside m4 aqua. Yes, Snapdragon 615 is pile of crap
well, this is my MM result on antutu.
Andrew21P said:
well, this is my MM result on antutu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Damn, did u anyhow change settings, tweaked MM or something like that?
depressed_ said:
Damn, did u anyhow change settings, tweaked MM or something like that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, my M4 Aqua is almost out of the box, 100% stock, bootloader locked, never root, just updated via Xperia Companion a few hours ago.
I don't like the fact that mpdecision is not included in the new update. it gives me huge battery drain.
Anyone have problems with gallery apps? My pictures doesn't render to be watched, only a black screen, the files are ok and the SD Card is new
7564321 said:
Mobile Data got buggy for me, didn't work until restart. Guys what happening with the Speaker it was so loud before now is very reduced i check settings nothing to about it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I also found that speaker was louder and clear on LP plus even have a little bit of distortion at max volume now, and in mi case, performance in 3D games was smoother in LP 3.120 with ondemand CPU governor. It might fix again if i change governor in MM but still not rooted as im waiting for a method for locked bootloader.
Morfarj said:
I don't like the fact that mpdecision is not included in the new update. it gives me huge battery drain.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Snapdragon 615 does not need it nor it's compatible with mpdecision..
Sony won't be adding any hotplug as they don't make
Custom kernel or drivers.. It's just qualcomm,s fault..
Is somebody else bothered with the weird gap between the signal bars and the battery icon?
Also, does anyone know how can I remove agv Antivirus? I'll appreciate it.
Guys i noticed that the brightest is very low for out side
Sent from my E2333 using XDA-Developers mobile app
I like New update, everything seems to work ok, i have made adoptable sfor?ie tru adb (mixed 50) and i am pleased with result. I think rom needs a day or two to settled down... Yesterday i run AnTuTu and obtained 35k scor and today i got 36.7k... maybe tomorrow i'll get 40k... :laugh:
Everything is just great, but i miss the real stamina mode from Sony..
Sent from my E2303 using Tapatalk
http://www.xda-developers.com/andro...every-car-through-updated-app-on-smartphones/
Looks like it may run on LP ROMs. Didn't tried yet.
That looks really interesting. Might be the reason I've been waiting for to upgrade to 5.1
Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk
pa.ko said:
http://www.xda-developers.com/andro...every-car-through-updated-app-on-smartphones/
Looks like it may run on LP ROMs. Didn't tried yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not installing on my LP unit running @dsa8310 October ROM. Starts the installation and after a few seconds - App not installed. At first I thought it's location-based but installed OK on my Samsung phone (Marshmallow)
m00n61 said:
Not installing on my LP unit running @dsa8310 October ROM. Starts the installation and after a few seconds - App not installed. At first I thought it's location-based but installed OK on my Samsung phone (Marshmallow)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think you installed the arm64 version. You need the arm version. Mine is working. Make sure you installed the google app and google play music app before installing. Normally android auto is installing this in its installation, but than it goes in a loop (in mine case). So install them first.
For the rest android auto is slow, because it's using google maps, which is slow in the android 5.1 version. Spotify is working fine btw.
I'm working for a MAnufacture which produces HU for cars. Right now there is a native Android System for cars in discussion.
Source:
http://www.computerworld.com/articl...auto-making-your-car-a-big-mobile-device.html
I installed this on my Joying RK3188 running the latest Malaysk 5.1.1 ROM. Unfortunately, the ROM itself is so slow, Android Auto is almost unusuable. It does work, mind you, but the ROM seems to be the problem. Anyone know any bare-bones 5.1.1 ROMs that run quick? Thanks.
dcdttu said:
I installed this on my Joying RK3188 running the latest Malaysk 5.1.1 ROM. Unfortunately, the ROM itself is so slow, Android Auto is almost unusuable. It does work, mind you, but the ROM seems to be the problem. Anyone know any bare-bones 5.1.1 ROMs that run quick? Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
try DSA room, its best 5.1 rom I used
dcdttu said:
I installed this on my Joying RK3188 running the latest Malaysk 5.1.1 ROM. Unfortunately, the ROM itself is so slow, Android Auto is almost unusuable. It does work, mind you, but the ROM seems to be the problem. Anyone know any bare-bones 5.1.1 ROMs that run quick? Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not exactly the ROM. It's the combination Google Maps + Google Now + Android Auto. I tried it on a clean ROM with only root and pretty much everything removed and it's unusable.
I also noticed that a 5.1 ROM will run OK as long as you only have either Google Maps or Google Now. When you have both it's barely working.
m00n61 said:
It's not exactly the ROM. It's the combination Google Maps + Google Now + Android Auto. I tried it on a clean ROM with only root and pretty much everything removed and it's unusable.
I also noticed that a 5.1 ROM will run OK as long as you only have either Google Maps or Google Now. When you have both it's barely working.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't know if it is only RAM related. These units have very poor CPU profile - throttling. stepup clock control settings which use highest clock only rarely so most of the time CPU is running slow so many processes suffer especially when multiple apps are running in background.
I'm not using 5.1 ROM (as I see still issues and people complaining) so I cannot test if and what apps mix causes issues.
You may try some kernel tools for testing different governors, CPU throttling (yes I would try also thermal throttling if you want to be on the safe side as rumours are Chinese used above mentioned downclocked setup in order to save CPU from overheating as there is no heat sink).
It would be interesting to open new thread for this. Much improvements may be achieved only by tuning kernel. And that needs some experimenting and practising.
Also, regarding 5.1 it is well known that it is 'heavy' and one of the main points of 6 (MM) was to reduce resource usage. So instead jumping to LP and having resource issues, I'll wait to see if there will be progress on MM which may resolve much of the problems around.
pa.ko said:
Don't know if it is only RAM related. These units have very poor CPU profile - throttling. stepup clock control settings which use highest clock only rarely so most of the time CPU is running slow so many processes suffer especially when multiple apps are running in background.
I'm not using 5.1 ROM (as I see still issues and people complaining) so I cannot test if and what apps mix causes issues.
You may try some kernel tools for testing different governors, CPU throttling (yes I would try also thermal throttling if you want to be on the safe side as rumours are Chinese used above mentioned downclocked setup in order to save CPU from overheating as there is no heat sink).
It would be interesting to open new thread for this. Much improvements may be achieved only by tuning kernel. And that needs some experimenting and practising.
Also, regarding 5.1 it is well known that it is 'heavy' and one of the main points of 6 (MM) was to reduce resource usage. So instead jumping to LP and having resource issues, I'll wait to see if there will be progress on MM which may resolve much of the problems around.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree. From monitoring resource usage under 5.1 I have to say that while RAM usage will rarely go over 700 MB CPU is aggressively downclocked. However, I need to first add a heatsink and then play with governors.
However, not sure how much would that really help with Android Auto, it's so damn slow it takes like 20 seconds just to start
m00n61 said:
I agree. From monitoring resource usage under 5.1 I have to say that while RAM usage will rarely go over 700 MB CPU is aggressively downclocked. However, I need to first add a heatsink and then play with governors.
However, not sure how much would that really help with Android Auto, it's so damn slow it takes like 20 seconds just to start
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Heatsink issue is to be investigated also. For instance many phones do not have heatsinks and still endure very heavy usage. So it may be not necessary. For instance, thermal throttling may be sufficient.
Thus, both governor and thermal control should be investigated. I believe it is possible with little effort to tune these units to work very nicely without much hw poking.
SW in these units is just so bad and poor it is almost unbelievable! Beside designers didn't have basic knowledge on architecture, they even 'tuned' many things in just opposite of what is needed. They could have better situation if only leaves everything by default in AOSP