Looks like Samsung will be sending an update for people who won't be following the recall advisory. The update will only allow you to charge your phone to 60%... I wonder if you could just deny any further updates????
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/2778...ts-samsung-quick-fix-note-7-no-full-recharge#
Update: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/xda-developers/ShsH/~3/B62H8Rt1qe4/
Looks like it's not a sure thing just yet...
I'm already capping mine to 90% since the press release of battery cell issue.
Yeah. I just charge it but never let it charge to 100%. Heck a lot of plugging in and unplugging the entire day.
Sent from my SM-N930F using Tapatalk
Why not use a debloat tool to disable the two SDM apks on the phone? That is what I did, it was my understanding that this would stop any automatic updates from happening. Unless Samsung has a backdoor to enable the SDM apk's or another way to push an update that I am not aware of.
teegunn said:
Why not use a debloat tool to disable the two SDM apks on the phone? That is what I did, it was my understanding that this would stop any automatic updates from happening. Unless Samsung has a backdoor to enable the SDM apk's or another way to push an update that I am not aware of.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im using package disabler pro and cant see anything with SDM could you give me the exact names to disable. Cheers.
Sent from my SM-N930F using XDA-Developers mobile app
jadaress1 said:
Im using package disabler pro and cant see anything with SDM could you give me the exact names to disable. Cheers.
Sent from my SM-N930F using XDA-Developers mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure. They are called "System updates". In package disabler pro, which I also use, they are near the bottom of the list of apps to disable.
com.samsung.sdm
com.samsung.sdm.sdmviewer
I have had those two SDM's disabled from almost day one I got my phone. I did take the early OTA, so I enabled these to do that then disabled them again after that. The early OTA wasn't anything big and in my research about it I went ahead and took it. But I won't be taking any OTA that caps my battery at 60%. No way, not thanks. I don't think there is anything wrong with my N7 or it's battery (one can never know for sure I guess) and it's been working flawlessly. It does not get hot during charging or any other time and I have apps to monitor those things. Still, I will be swapping my phone for the new Note 7 once they are available. I am just not going to gimp this one capping the battery at 60%.
teegunn said:
Why not use a debloat tool to disable the two SDM apks on the phone? That is what I did, it was my understanding that this would stop any automatic updates from happening. Unless Samsung has a backdoor to enable the SDM apk's or another way to push an update that I am not aware of.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hopefully the replacements will reach me before thw update does... That's just a hope tho.
Just to chime in but i dont have them 2 files. Could it be they're named differently on my exynos version?
Sent from my SM-N930F using XDA-Developers mobile app
I have the exynos and my two files I found in ez package Disabler and the two files were named "software update"
Sent from my SM-N930F using Tapatalk
Ok thanks ive disabled the 2 software update files, they were just named differently on mine nothing with sdm.
Sent from my SM-N930F using XDA-Developers mobile app
Vic5870 said:
Yeah. I just charge it but never let it charge to 100%. Heck a lot of plugging in and unplugging the entire day.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I habe basically the same usage..
I just got an update notification from T-mobile. I can't think of anything else that this could be..
teegunn said:
Sure. They are called "System updates". In package disabler pro, which I also use, they are near the bottom of the list of apps to disable.
com.samsung.sdm
com.samsung.sdm.sdmviewer
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get nothing like this on my French Note 7
I've disabled
com.sec.android.soagent ==> Software update
com.wssynccmldm ==> Software update
com.samsung.firmware.sensorhub ==>UrgentFWUpdateSensorHUb
com.samsung.android.firmware.tsp ==> UrgentFWUpdateTSP
Seems to work, but the orange 1 on settings icons is still there
I found that US customers get an IMEI Verification system to see if your phone is affected ... but in France, nothing like this ...
I've to wait until Orange sell Note 7 to public and exchange mine directly ...:crying:
Related
Is it possible / advisable to remove the "Verizon Remote Diagnosis" tool? I think that's what's triggering the OTA update. I see it running every now and then. I'd feel more comfortable with it off my phone.
drumz0rz said:
Is it possible / advisable to remove the "Verizon Remote Diagnosis" tool? I think that's what's triggering the OTA update. I see it running every now and then. I'd feel more comfortable with it off my phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2149417
this is what you want to do... and yes you can remove the Remote Diagnosis tool too
I kill off anything like that and its never been a problem. If its running on its own sometimes it will help your battery life too when you get rid of it.
Sent from my DNA... S-Off like a baws
drumz0rz said:
Is it possible / advisable to remove the "Verizon Remote Diagnosis" tool? I think that's what's triggering the OTA update. I see it running every now and then. I'd feel more comfortable with it off my phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My kernel disables this service and I still received the OTA so I don't think it is related.
drumz0rz said:
Is it possible / advisable to remove the "Verizon Remote Diagnosis" tool? I think that's what's triggering the OTA update. I see it running every now and then. I'd feel more comfortable with it off my phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The tool cannot be used without a security key tech support provides when activated.
As a tech agent for big red, I've only used it a couple times when customers have no clue how to use their phones. In those instances, its a pricesless tool!
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 2
MicroMod777 said:
The tool cannot be used without a security key tech support provides when activated.
As a tech agent for big red, I've only used it a couple times when customers have no clue how to use their phones. In those instances, its a pricesless tool!
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sounds like a cool tool would love it if I could use it from my desktop. If I could use a RDP from my home computer that would be sweet. I personally delete it from the ROM that and the other files mentioned in post above.
A couple days ago I found an interesting app make appearance on my device by the name of "Ant"
I ignored it no big deal just more Google junk auto installing but when I checked Playstore this evening I found "Ant" had update pending.
I also found tons of reviews giving overall rating 2.5 , Some call it NSA spyware etc bad bad stuff slowing device.
That got my attention so I cleared its data freezing using titanium backup.
End result no more Spyware on board and device performance has increased tremendously.
Screen shot shows app files
Most of the ant apps I believe have to do with hardware support for ant+. It's a fitness tracking device.
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
tp2215 said:
Most of the ant apps I believe have to do with hardware support for ant+. It's a fitness tracking device.
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah that's what its builders calling it.
Since it installed on my device without permission , it cant be uninstalled if your not rooted & 90% of playstore posters calling it spyware.
Thats a pretty good sign its up to no good
Don't be silly, ANT+ is just a protocol for devices to share information, an oversimplification, but compare it to Bluetooth. It allows devices (usually fitness wearables) to communicate with your phone correctly. You can uninstall it if you don't have any devices that use ANT but it's not "spyware" and it's not going to slow down your device. People posting in the Play Store are not exactly geniuses...
CitrixLemon said:
Don't be silly, ANT+ is just a protocol for devices to share information, an oversimplification, but compare it to Bluetooth. It allows devices (usually fitness wearables) to communicate with your phone correctly. You can uninstall it if you don't have any devices that use ANT but it's not "spyware" and it's not going to slow down your device. People posting in the Play Store are not exactly geniuses...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah pretty silly , app that auto installs giving you no choice to deny and cant be completely uninstalled from device hmm
its good you have the inside scoop everything's dandy.
http://www.androidauthority.com/nsa-ant-328858/
sling said:
yeah pretty silly , app that auto installs giving you no choice to deny and cant be completely uninstalled from device hmm
its good you have the inside scoop everything's dandy.
http://www.androidauthority.com/nsa-ant-328858/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are a bunch of apps like that on the phone which deal with various wireless communications, you can't turn off the WiFi apps either. Just because the NSA happens to use the same acronym for one of their divisions doesn't mean anything. Although I guess that's what got all the people from the Play Store started. Take your tinfoil hat off...
CitrixLemon said:
There are a bunch of apps like that on the phone which deal with various wireless communications, you can't turn off the WiFi apps either. Just because the NSA happens to use the same acronym for one of their divisions doesn't mean anything. Although I guess that's what got all the people from the Play Store started. Take your tinfoil hat off...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dont forget those in XDA forums calling it none spyware.
Who could be right? hmm to each his own I guess believe what you will.
Ive disabled the crap & yes my device performance has improved.
sling said:
A couple days ago I found an interesting app make appearance on my device by the name of "Ant"
I ignored it no big deal just more Google junk auto installing but when I checked Playstore this evening I found "Ant" had update pending.
I also found tons of reviews giving overall rating 2.5 , Some call it NSA spyware etc bad bad stuff slowing device.
That got my attention so I cleared its data freezing using titanium backup.
End result no more Spyware on board and device performance has increased tremendously.
Screen shot shows app files
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can install all the apps you want, but if the NSA want to track you they will. As soon as you hit the Internet, privacy goes out the window for all those paranoids out there.
Sent from my SM-G900T using XDA Free mobile app
daxecutioner24 said:
You can install all the apps you want, but if the NSA want to track you they will. As soon as you hit the Internet, privacy goes out the window for all those paranoids out there.
Sent from my SM-G900T using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is true but why have app on board that's not manufacture released , Not google app release , auto install on device without you knowing , Cant be fully removed without root
Anyway Developers website - http://www.thisisant.com/consumer/
Everyone needs this app on board , makes sense right?
Its spyware in my book
sling said:
This is true but why have app on board that's not manufacture released , Not google app release , auto install on device without you knowing , Cant be fully removed without root
Anyway Developers website - http://www.thisisant.com/consumer/
Everyone needs this app on board , it makes sense right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think the point is that as a wireless connection standard it helps the company (ANT) if they have it preinstalled on as many devices as possible so that they are "ANT+ Ready" so to speak. Samsung's Galaxy Gear line of watches and wearables uses ANT+ so that's probably why they include it, and/or ANT paid them to do it.
CitrixLemon said:
I think the point is that as a wireless connection standard it helps the company (ANT) if they have it preinstalled on as many devices as possible so that they are "ANT+ Ready" so to speak. Samsung's Galaxy Gear line of watches and wearables uses ANT+ so that's probably why they include it, and/or ANT paid them to do it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well the good news gear functions without it being enabled
Anyway I have no need for it , Those that need enjoy what ever it does for you,
sling said:
Yeah that's what its builders calling it.
Since it installed on my device without permission , it cant be uninstalled if your not rooted & 90% of playstore posters calling it spyware.
Thats a pretty good sign its up to no good
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
90% of Play Store people rate apps 2 stars when it's a user error lol
NSA ain't watching you xD
If you don't want to be snooped on, you better remove Carrier IQ from your phone too.
sling said:
Well the good news gear functions without it being enabled
Anyway I have no need for it , Those that need enjoy what ever it does for you,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lmao.......and what? You think Google isn't keeping tabs on everything you do? And you are worried about a service app like ant?
idk
Why not just run Ubuntu...
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
Wow...this thread is hilarious. .
There watching you...lol..
They installed 2 gigs worth
Of crap I didn't give
them permission Too...lol
Sent from my SM-G900T using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
If the nsa put software on your phone, they wouldn't advertise it.
Sent from my SM-G900T using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
The reviews for this app are hilarious!
Damn narcissists ;]
And seems to have stopped becoming useful
Thread closed
FNSM
Hello my fellow people,
I am warning the people who may not know what VZW does on calls. So I called support because I am having an issue with my charging port. Simply just need it replaced so I can properly charge my phone and connect it to my PC without it randomly disconnecting. So I call them and go to tier 2 to explain my problem. I do and the representative ask me to give them a quick second to see what the issue may be. I wait for about 30 seconds and to make a long story short, their diagnostic tool found my device to be rooted, so there was nothing they would do. So yes, when you call in with a problem, software or hardware, they do a diagnostic test to see if the device has been rooted. So I had to call back several times to get a representative who would not see the previous test done, and run a new one while I was unrooted. So now my account is clean but with a major headache. So XDAers, DO NOT CALL VZW FOR SUPPRT WHILE ROOTED. I WAS GOING TO BEFORE I SENT IN THE PHONE BUT THAT DOESNT WORK. UNROOT AND BE STOCK BEFORE CALLING. Hope this little story helped.
Update: Yes, they run the tool without permission from the user
Just had this same issue..tryed to play dumb...however...no luck..go back to stock then retry!!
Sent from my Nexus 7 using XDA Free mobile app
Slys13 said:
Just had this same issue..tryed to play dumb...however...no luck..go back to stock then retry!!
Sent from my Nexus 7 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep. I did and they retested. I'm just wondering how they can do it without customer permission.
I would have asked them to explain how they think a physical part of the phone would be damaged from a software aspect of the phone. The onus is on them to prove it.
Edit: I always call from another phone and make sure the phone I'm calling about is in airplane mode so there is no chance for them to connect to it just to be safe anyways.
What file do they use to access the phone? The my Verizon app?
Sent from my SM-N900V using XDA Free mobile app
Slys13 said:
Just had this same issue..tryed to play dumb...however...no luck..go back to stock then retry!!
Sent from my Nexus 7 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They are idiots I had same issue as op. They said I was rooted I said that's bull**** my build number reads blah blah blah. The thot said let me talk to my super and I got my replacement even thot they claimed I was rooted when in fact I reall was. Suck it vzw
warriorpluto said:
What file do they use to access the phone? The my Verizon app?
Sent from my SM-N900V using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I honestly don't know...
streetracer8605 said:
I would have asked them to explain how they think a physical part of the phone would be damaged from a software aspect of the phone. The onus is on them to prove it.
Edit: I always call from another phone and make sure the phone I'm calling about is in airplane mode so there is no chance for them to connect to it just to be safe anyways.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I always call from another phone too, but my Note wasn't in airplane mode though. Gonna do that from now on.
Should try root cloak xposed module. That may help.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk
ihavenewnike said:
Yep. I did and they retested. I'm just wondering how they can do it without customer permission.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The my Verizon app asks for root access if you have Superuser installed and requests pop up. I've seen it myself once and wondered..... If I didn't have an app to notify me, would it have given that app root access silently? I bet it does.
neyenlives said:
The my Verizon app asks for root access if you have Superuser installed and requests pop up. I've seen it myself once and wondered..... If I didn't have an app to notify me, would it have given that app root access silently? I bet it does.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct. The my Verizon app is exactly how they can tell.
neyenlives said:
The my Verizon app asks for root access if you have Superuser installed and requests pop up. I've seen it myself once and wondered..... If I didn't have an app to notify me, would it have given that app root access silently? I bet it does.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ISIS app that comes bloated on the N900V also asks for superuser access. It also will not run on a rooted device. I'm betting if It wasn't rooted it would also have gotten access silently as does my Verizon app.
I thought it was common knowledge that, if you're rooted, you disable data/wifi when you're calling into VZW support. They can't connect to their little spy-app if there's no internet service. I've called into support and they've tried, unsuccessfully, to connect to mine.
SirBindy said:
I thought it was common knowledge that, if you're rooted, you disable data/wifi when you're calling into VZW support. They can't connect to their little spy-app if there's no internet service. I've called into support and they've tried, unsuccessfully, to connect to mine.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree, I only have called in after flashing stock.
mjh68 said:
I agree, I only have called in after flashing stock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I usually do the same. I did have a problem and had my USB port go bad. I took it to the store and they never noticed it was rooted.
Sent from my Note 4 using Tapatalk.
RomsWell said:
Correct. The my Verizon app is exactly how they can tell.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think so, I didn't have it installed. And I have denied root before on other phones. Also I can't use the exposed module because they can check your installs on your phone.
Towel root
So I just got a new refurb from Verizon/Assurion and found something interesting. One of the first apks I installed was the CM Virus Protection and scanned my phone. My phone is not rooted stock everything. CM scanned my phone and found a suspicious system exploit however though... Towelroot! I guess reseting the phone factory and even from Assurion somehow the previous owner had root, and parts of it somehow sustained. Weird that they would send out a phone like this if a simple virus scanner picked it right up on first try. Just thought id throw that out there.
I wish I would have seen this earlier. 10 calls in for reception, normally airplane mode and I forgot, bam. "Take it to the Samsung booth in best buy they can read flash the phone".....odin ain't helping this problem. Lmao
I just disable the my verizon app on all my phones so I never have this issue.
What should we do now that SABS is gone?
Well I still have it installed and running fine. What's the problem with yours?
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
Vish.N said:
Well I still have it installed and running fine. What's the problem with yours?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine is also still installed but I can't use the app anymore cause I think Samsung banned my knox key
When I open it it will ask to activate the key
Can I make a new one or will they ban it again ?
does anyone have a list of what the standard package blocked?
does mmottis host still work?
when i add getaddhell standard and fanboys ultimate it blocks so much stuff i cant use half my apps (even if i shut off blocking in those apps)
I got an email not long ago that said the SDK is being discontinued and inviting me to something new. I also seen that they issues a DMCA takedown request to xda on the SABS thread. Guess they don't want you having so much control
I have it and it's still working but I guess it's dead because of Samsung =( I did not get a message or email about trying something new. I just found out about sabs and spent a good 10 hours getting it to install with using my old computer lol I want to know what is next so I can prepare. Just kind of funny, I finally got it working and then the very next day it's locked
0chilly said:
I have it and it's still working but I guess it's dead because of Samsung =( I did not get a message or email about trying something new. I just found out about sabs and spent a good 10 hours getting it to install with using my old computer lol I want to know what is next so I can prepare. Just kind of funny, I finally got it working and then the very next day it's locked
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try Adhell 3
I'm using adhell3. Check reddit for instructions; a little more hassle now that the creator removed Knox libs.
Anyway, just curious, as long as you have the source and can compile with new package names and use your own block list, wouldn't it still work forever? Just re-generate a new knox key every 3 months, right?
New phone, need instructions
Worked great, then I had to replace my phone. Reinstalled and now it doesn't block anything. Wanted to run back through the instructions and now it has all been removed.
Can anyone help?
My SABS isn't blocking anything anymore? I'm using Steven Black hosts file. Any ideas?
https://github.com/GoldenKappa/notSABS
Neo3D said:
My SABS isn't blocking anything anymore? I'm using Steven Black hosts file. Any ideas?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same problem now
Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
Im imagining that they emailed the key to you before all this went down. So im trying to find the key in my email but no such luck.
Does anyone know for sure how they sent the key when they were?
Hello!
I want to disable some bloatware and I heard bk disabler was the way to go but apparently it does not work anymore.
Is there any possible alternative to this?
Cheers
bk manager works great for me
bassgenerator said:
bk manager works great for me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which one is that one?
nad4321 said:
Which one is that one?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Package Disabler Pro
This works fine for me.
Do you have to set device owner through adb? I got the message about KNOX permission exception in adb windows.
guyd said:
Package Disabler Pro
This works fine for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's what I use too.
hyl4me said:
Do you have to set device owner through adb? I got the message about KNOX permission exception in adb windows.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did not, you need to set the companion app up though. PDP Something or other. Ic an disable pretty much and package with that, no ADB, No Root, bla bla bla...
Scott said:
That's what I use too.
I did not, you need to set the companion app up though. PDP Something or other. Ic an disable pretty much and package with that, no ADB, No Root, bla bla bla...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. I think the issue with me was I need to connect to the internet
In my S8+ days I was using Adhell, it was working great, but the Samsung Enterprise Alliance account + generated key is needed...
guyd said:
Package Disabler Pro
This works fine for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
halo boys. what is the difference between bk manager which is no longer in Play Store and Package Disabler for. well thank you. I'm using bk disabler
bassgenerator said:
halo boys. what is the difference between bk manager which is no longer in Play Store and Package Disabler for. well thank you. I'm using bk disabler
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Both do the same. I like bk disabler cause i can actually see the apps running apps. How much ram space are they using, i didnt see this with other PD.
The adb method worked fine for me
chrisrodsa210 said:
The adb method worked fine for me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the adb method is a disadvantage for me. sometimes I need to enable some application. I do not want to do factory reset. just to know your friend
bassgenerator said:
the adb method is a disadvantage for me. sometimes I need to enable some application. I do not want to do factory reset. just to know your friend
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Never really needed them, once they were gone
chrisrodsa210 said:
Never really needed them, once they were gone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it's me and you are ... it's different for every person and his needs: Dobrý:
See my extensive post on BK Disabler for Samsung: https://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-s5/help/how-to-recover-bk-disabler-induced-boot-t3793157
Cheers,
Bruce
BruceElliott said:
See my extensive post on BK Disabler for Samsung: https://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-s5/help/how-to-recover-bk-disabler-induced-boot-t3793157
Cheers,
Bruce
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats a great write up, the detail is impressive.
But pulling the battery? The S5 you used is ancient at this point, maybe wise to note the device in the post and a disclaimer that using another may yield different results.
People on here dont pay much attention to detail so just because its in the S5forum doesnt mean they will clue in lol.
That and newer sammy software/android version is much different than whats on the S5 people may get a surprise using that method on the S9 (i haven't tried it so cant be sure).
sent from my Exynos S9 plus, Pixel 2 XL or Note FE
force70 said:
Thats a great write up, the detail is impressive.
But pulling the battery? The S5 you used is ancient at this point, maybe wise to note the device in the post and a disclaimer that using another may yield different results.
People on here dont pay much attention to detail so just because its in the S5forum doesnt mean they will clue in lol.
That and newer sammy software/android version is much different than whats on the S5 people may get a surprise using that method on the S9 (i haven't tried it so cant be sure).
sent from my Exynos S9 plus, Pixel 2 XL or Note FE
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's a good point, Force70. I added the caveat to the write-up; thanks. I've never had a phone without a removable battery, so not sure how to power off such a phone when the processor hangs, in a boot loop, etc. TWRP 3.2.1-0 requires a first boot to recovery after flashing, so Odin auto-boot to system after flash feature won't work. Buying a phone without a removable battery seems to me to be a really bad idea for various reasons. For one, I must be taken kicking and screaming to the phone store to buy a new phone as I find it such a hassle. So, I might need to replace the battery during the phone's life. A sealed-in battery appears to me like built-in obsolesence perpetrated by the manufacturer. I guess it doen't matter much for people who change phones ofen, though.
Cheers!
BruceElliott said:
That's a good point, Force70. I added the caveat to the write-up; thanks. I've never had a phone without a removable battery, so not sure how to power off such a phone when the processor hangs, in a boot loop, etc. TWRP 3.2.1-0 requires a first boot to recovery after flashing, so Odin auto-boot to system after flash feature won't work. Buying a phone without a removable battery seems to me to be a really bad idea for various reasons. For one, I must be taken kicking and screaming to the phone store to buy a new phone as I find it such a hassle. So, I might need to replace the battery during the phone's life. A sealed-in battery appears to me like built-in obsolesence perpetrated by the manufacturer. I guess it doen't matter much for people who change phones ofen, though.
Cheers!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On the newer devices pressing and holding volume down, plus home plus power simulates a battery pull generally.
So not a total problem but battery pull was a sure thing lol
sent from my Exynos S9 plus, Pixel 2 XL or Note FE
where can I get an old copy of BK Disabler anybody with the apk ?