Hi Dear Community,
I'm just a Noob but learning, Pardon me if the question is silly.
I'm trying to Build ROM using UBER toolchain/Hyper Toolchain.
What will be the possible issues on your opinions?
Suppose if I could use CAF sources & Uber toolchain to Build Resurrection Remix Rom,
Is it possible? If yes, what might be the possible issues ?
I'm just curious about how the Experienced devs here think of the topic.
@yuweng , @crpalmer , @BadDaemon , @gopinaidu77 , @jsbeyond
& Also I apologize for tagging if disturbed.
Cheers! :angel:
Doesn't wanna sound rude, just GTS :laugh: but first, learn how to build the ROMs first, toolchains are advance stuff, AFAIK as of now, non works on N, not to mentioned a totally different build system like Soong, Blueprint, Ninja, Kati and Go on N...
Friedrich Nietzsche said:
He who would learn to fly one day must first learn to stand and walk and run and climb and dance; one cannot fly into flying.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are toolchains for kernels, ROMs & latest addition is LLVM/ Clang, below are some custom ROMs with built-in custom Toolchains...
Cardinal-AOSP, you'll need flags like this & this, latest version is not always the best, if it doesn't boot or boots but with alot of FCs then switch to another one...
Tipsy, an Eg. here, Validus, another Eg. here & after you have successfully building it then you can move on to add-in custom toolchains to any custom ROMs, here are few worth reading... :good:
Good Luck...
Related
Hi,
Can someone make clear to me as a noobie what are the differences between "cores" of the ROMs?
I see there are most favourite ones like "XWLP9" and "AOKP" - what are the differences between them? I see AOKP has more updates from kernel and maybe some other things in addons? Besides XWLP9 seems to me more stable but I only observe rom peoples comments and replys so can someone tell me which ROM core I should be focused on when choosing ROM? Some advices, experiences what you have with them - ADVANTAGES and DISADVANTAGES maybe or something ... I see there are roms like these two from what I want to choose:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1436817
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1513150
Thank you for all your advices ...
Drahy said:
Hi,
Can someone make clear to me as a noobie what are the differences between "cores" of the ROMs?
I see there are most favourite ones like "XWLP9" and "AOKP" - what are the differences between them? I see AOKP has more updates from kernel and maybe some other things in addons? Besides XWLP9 seems to me more stable but I only observe rom peoples comments and replys so can someone tell me which ROM core I should be focused on when choosing ROM? Some advices, experiences what you have with them - ADVANTAGES and DISADVANTAGES maybe or something ... I see there are roms like these two from what I want to choose:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1436817
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1513150
Thank you for all your advices ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Google is your friend.
XWLP9 is the latest stock/official ROM version from Samsung for the SGS2 (GT-I9100).
So, these kind of ROMs are based on Samsung stock ROMs ... with some customizations (e.g. rooted, some removed bloatware, some custom themes/mods, etc.).
The other kind of custom ROMs have AOSP (Android open source project) or ASKP (Android open kang project).
So, they are either on pure Google Android OS or Linux. Usually there is a team of developers who share their parts/versions in binaries and as source code.
The kernel is kind of "core" of the firmware.
Every ROM contains its own kernel, as this is a basic part of the firmware ... and the phone can't work without it.
You can also flash other (custom) kernels on a ROM.
But not every kernel is compatible with every ROM.
OK thank you I read about these two a lot i needed some experienced opinion and clearing it up for me.
What I basically needed was opinions about these two versions from experienced users. If non oficial and trully open made ROM is better and in what ways or is it better to stay on oficial ones etc. This is what i wanted most from this thread ...
Hello everyone, I'm trying to compile a version of CM10.1 with Linaro Toolchain, but so far only managed to set the Linaro for part of the ROM (JAVA), while for the Kernel (C/C++) has not been successful.
In the link below, infected_ posted a brief tutorial on how to configure the environment to use Linaro, but only for part of the ROM (and works well :good. As for the kernel, it was unclear how to perform the configuration.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=42976693&postcount=12
Could anyone give me some help on how to configure Linaro to compile the Kernel CM10.1 along with the rest of the ROM?
Before someone politely send me to Google... I searched and got many errors... (I even "kill" my phone, but already revived her.).
Note: I have no interest in publishing my work, I'm just looking for knowledge because I am very curious!
New informations about Linaro configurations to compile the CM10.1 Kernel released by infected_:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=43649447&postcount=449
All information gathered here are authored by infected_, then give thanks to him!:good:
Sorry for my English and thank you!:highfive:
Someone, somewhere?
Ask the devs on here to help you mate. A few on here using that way of building . Im sure they will help out. Just ask really nice :thumbup:
andrewwright said:
Ask the devs on here to help you mate. A few on here using that way of building . Im sure they will help out. Just ask really nice :thumbup:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you my friend, I tried to ask a few things for some devs via PM, but usually they do not respond, because there are many requests all the days.
I found it interesting to create this topic because I've seen some people with the same question that I, and perhaps could be kept here a discussion.
But anyway I appreciate your interest!:good:
To be honest mate that sounds like a great idea. Keep trying pms and when you have compiled a working rom come bk and tells us (me) how. Soon im going to build a rom and am looking for all the info I can get on it. If I find what you need il come bk here. I read its smoother ui and better battery this way. It that why you choose this way of building?
Precisely, I read about it, and as I understand, when using Linaro Toochain, we get a gain of over 30% in performance, but I believe that the secret of all this performace is in the compilation of Kernel. And it is this part that I "got stuck" hehehe...
Currently my environment works well with Linaro Toochain 4.8-13.06 (compiling part of the ROM), and with Official Google GCC 4.7 (compiling the kernel).
At that moment I did not notice a significant gain in performance compared to the CM10.1 Official Nightly Builds.
Hello there guys,
As we all know we only have 3? 4? developers for the HOX+ . And they are really doing all they can to help keep the phone upto date.
But as we all know they are all busy and can't update their roms that much any longer.
EDIT: Lloir already has a guide : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2187266 but I don't think he covers how to fix camera and gps and stuff
So! Is it possible to make guide on how to compile the rom from the source? I know tombridden and lloir already made a one post guide on how to build some roms but it was too specific.
I now have an extra machine (a laptop) with 500gb free storage and ubuntu as the main OS. It's quite powerful too with 6gb RAM and i7. So Why not use it to help the community while others are busy? In the meantime I will look around for some guides for other phones but I don't think they will help that much.
And please include the answers to those questions if you make a guide:
1- What to do to fix camera/GPS/wifi/Data/sensors ?
2- What approach should I take when compiling a new ROM. For example: there are no developers for PACMAN , how will it differ during compiling between it and AOKP/CM/AOSP .
I am talking about a rom that wasn't approached by Lloir so he won't have the repos for them. What to do then?
Thanks a lot and I can't wait to help
@Lloir @tombriden @PippoX3 @mike1986. and any other developer out there.
you can start by looking at XDA-University
The reply is correct. All of us moved first steps studying at XDA University.
Anyway the case is more complex than others.
For this device there are really few developers. Other device have a lot of support from constructors, many dev and the team-work result in a lot of kernels/roms to flash for the final user.
If you wanna taste the happyness for build a rom, I'll send you a guide to setup your ubuntu, download the sources and build.
But in this case, where enrc2b is not officially support, the things are more difficult.
You must have a minimal practical with java, cpp, android and kernel code (if so).
For the moment I'm in trouble to build an AOKP 4.2.2 with new kernel. I haven't device to try, 'cause the hard is build&&try continuosly.
Not the fact to have a pc turned on for hours and hours.... and the eyes&&mind open for hours and hours... but the patience to continuously try time after time.
Now I am in a dead point... many users like have S2W enable on new CM kernel... but.... the kernel won't!
Thanks a lot anyway. Thanks to @Lloir, @tombriden, @maxwen and alls who's workin' for this device.
Stay tuned....
PippoX3 said:
The reply is correct. All of us moved first steps studying at XDA University.
Anyway the case is more complex than others.
For this device there are really few developers. Other device have a lot of support from constructors, many dev and the team-work result in a lot of kernels/roms to flash for the final user.
If you wanna taste the happyness for build a rom, I'll send you a guide to setup your ubuntu, download the sources and build.
But in this case, where enrc2b is not officially support, the things are more difficult.
You must have a minimal practical with java, cpp, android and kernel code (if so).
For the moment I'm in trouble to build an AOKP 4.2.2 with new kernel. I haven't device to try, 'cause the hard is build&&try continuosly.
Not the fact to have a pc turned on for hours and hours.... and the eyes&&mind open for hours and hours... but the patience to continuously try time after time.
Now I am in a dead point... many users like have S2W enable on new CM kernel... but.... the kernel won't!
Thanks a lot anyway. Thanks to @Lloir, @tombriden, @maxwen and alls who's workin' for this device.
Stay tuned....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's what i did already. I set up the periphals/kernel/device info GITs and now i am looking for the roms, I found CM and stuff but I can't find PURE AOSP , does that mean i must download it and upload it?
I also have Oracle java installed. Do I have to have open JDK?
Ghand0ur said:
That's what i did already. I set up the periphals/kernel/device info GITs and now i am looking for the roms, I found CM and stuff but I can't find PURE AOSP , does that mean i must download it and upload it?
I also have Oracle java installed. Do I have to have open JDK?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://github.com/pure-aosp/android
Lloir said:
https://github.com/pure-aosp/android
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now that we begin to have a solid CM base, will possible to build at least CM for enrc2b for noobs too.
And eventually "port" device/kernel" parts to others platforms. So who like e.g. PA can do...
If you agree, I can paste my personal appoints to a guide, from client setup (Sun java don't works) to the build zip rom.
Updated and corrected to last KK.
PippoX3 said:
Now that we begin to have a solid CM base, will possible to build at least CM for enrc2b for noobs too.
And eventually "port" device/kernel" parts to others platforms. So who like e.g. PA can do...
If you agree, I can paste my personal appoints to a guide, from client setup (Sun java don't works) updated and corrected to last KK.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Go for it. Saves me doing it which I was about to do
Sent from my One X+ using Tapatalk
I know Its pretty dumb to ask after seeing a lot of tutorial here, But I really can't understand! My Device is a huawei ascend y300. I have lots of custom rom on various forums. So I wanna built one myself! One of the developer built cm 11 from source and he is rolling out nightly on a daily basis. My interest is to build the cm11 too on my own computer based on his device specific changes he has done. and he has done a lots of changes for our device. Also if I can make any other rom from its source based of his work like mokee rom, or slimbeam etc. ANy help is appriciated. thnk you
I left condor community 4-5 months ago i am free for a while need some confidence to start again.....because my start was pretty controversial (happens with almost everyone)...so tell me if you want kernel and we can discuss here about all of my projects
INSPIRE-REX said:
I left condor community 4-5 months ago i am free for a while need some confidence to start again.....because my start was pretty controversial (happens with almost everyone)...so tell me if you want kernel and we can discuss here about all of my projects
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We need custom ROMs bro. And thanks for coming back. We/I missed u alot.
Glad we have you back after such a long time..
And yes we need Roms instead of kernels.
kernel is more utility intead rom
Hi,
There are many unofficial ROMs around. It would be good to have a maintainer for an official ROM.
DU 10.6 is one of the best ROMs I have ever used. It is great to see you back. Now we are in need of a new kernel developer. It would be great if you make a new kernel
Yes need DT2W kernel
we need kernel....???
I am using moto e 2014 running on cm14.1 (lineage OS). I need a kernel for it which supports overclocking. Please make a kernel for it. It is running on android 7.1.2.
Thank You
It would be nice to have a kernel with light tweaks and DT2W, because too many "tweaks" makes the kernel some unstable like clarity kernel.
About roms, it would be nice to have DU
Sorry for my english and any misunderstood
Kernel with DT2W
AOSIP ROM please bro :laugh::good:
Possibility of a new version of the kernel? 3.10 or maybe even the latest 3.18?