Kernel with EAS Support - Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Questions & Answers

Hey guys,
is it possible to include EAS in our kernels?
http://www.androidauthority.com/arm-bringing-energy-aware-scheduling-to-android-664926/
It seems promising, the pixel phones are using it by default.

I've heard of it already, let's see if it's possible

On HTC 10 eas works fine, here are some links with information about eas posted from the dev.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=70710525
@MEGAX91 @Umang96 @psndna88 @khan_frd2002 @Ashish94 Is EAS something for your kernels?

@Try it or die i was planning to give it a try but its really time consuming and i dont think i can give that much time right now but if any other dev planing you might check this out
https://github.com/android/kernel_msm/tree/android-msm-bullhead-3.10-marshmallow-mr1-eas
Google added EAS to bullhead which is close to our base kernel, so that might work for us too

@Try it or die
Mate , we need accurate energy model in order to implant EAS support in kernel source.
i used EAS on my Le Max 2 before ( daily usage battery life is way better with EAS instead of old HMP )

MEGAX91 said:
@Try it or die
Mate , we need accurate energy model in order to implant EAS support in kernel source.
i used EAS on my Le Max 2 before ( daily usage battery life is way better with EAS instead of old HMP )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so is it again dependent of whether xiaomi relases sources or something?

quantesh said:
so is it again dependent of whether xiaomi relases sources or something?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No , i got the energy model from CAF!

MEGAX91 said:
No , i got the energy model from CAF!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh, ok, so at least there is hope.

Anybody already working on it? I checked the sources a bit and it looks like a ton of backporting.

MEGAX91 said:
No , i got the energy model from CAF!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great! Good luck.
Sent from my Redmi Note 3 using Tapatalk

Any news about EAS? Is there someone working on it or is there issues about the implementation ? Just saw that HTC 10 got a EAS kernel , maybe this could help https://www.xda-developers.com/xda-...h-energy-aware-scheduling-for-lineageos-roms/

Related

[KERNEL][3.0.31]standard + working HDMI

Hi, if someone is willing to try this kernel I will appreciate !
I need more user input, I tested it only on Droid 4 but the user base is not so large as RAZR so I made a build for it.
the kernel is a clean 3.0.31 (almost) there are no additional stuff like those present on dtrail JBX kernel, no overclocking, and based on my tests I can say it's stable. Most of the my version of kernel where merged on dtrail's kernel.
you can see in the picture attached that the standby seems to be really good (on 1735mah)
you need to use safestrap 3.65 or overwrite the files directly in the rom image.
I repeat that I don't own a RAZR and I would appreciate your input.
Edit:
the sources are here:
https://github.com/lucize/android_kernel_motorola_omap4-common
07.04.2014 - improve hdmi detection, should work 1080p everywhere, hwc.c update is needed from your ROM maintainer
19.03.2014 - hdmi from kernel 3.4, my sony avr is now a good boy and outputs sound
18.03.2014 - fixed HDMI native cable and colors, 720p and sound over HDMI on my philips but 1080p over DVI, movies 1080p over HDMI, but no sound on my sony receiver without a monitor attached, please share your experience.
17.03.2014
WIP HDMI, on my philips monitor, hdmi - hdmi is not working, only hdmi - dvi, please test if this is working for you, the colors are reversed, hopefully i'll understand why, tested only on droid 4, please share your experience.
Regards
Thanks, umts_spider ? (XT910)
By.TRabZonLu™ said:
Thanks, umts_spider ? (XT910)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No screen time on battery using screen?
Maybe later I try. anyway thanks for sharing with us
( Hacı ekran süresi yok. Bence kötü gibi denemedim ama )
By.TRabZonLu™ said:
Thanks, umts_spider ? (XT910)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
should work, I don't know if there are more stuff to be enable for UMTS except modifying the build.prop
droid 4 is made for cdma by default, but I use it on gsm
I don't know what is the average standby of the battery for razr, but for droid 4, only when the phone was in standby and not moved around would last about 20h, now I have 45% with 24h uptime and in the middle of the week.
Regards
anticor248 said:
No screen time on battery using screen?
Maybe later I try. anyway thanks for sharing with us
( Hacı ekran süresi yok. Bence kötü gibi denemedim ama )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
for screen you can see this
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=50423144&postcount=588
but the battery was ~50% when I flashed the last kernel
It's a bit laggy and battery drain is considerable. Tried it with Liquidsmooth kitkat 18/02 + PA gapps
Sent from my XT910 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
halifage said:
It's a bit laggy and battery drain is considerable. Tried it with Liquidsmooth kitkat 18/02 + PA gapps
Sent from my XT910 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thank you for testing and input !
I would like to know if someone else is having bad experience whit this (regarding to standby and not heavy usage, because lacking 100 mhz support), over jbx kernel thread I see lot of positive things after drtail incorporating it to his work.
I don't know what to think if this kernel is good on general omap4 without more tweaks or only on droid 4?
trying to merge parts of 3.4 or greater should be considered ? or is waste of time as I achieved my goals with this (except hdmi).
thank you for your input !
Regards
lucize said:
I would like to know if someone else is having bad experience whit this (regarding to standby and not heavy usage, because lacking 100 mhz support), over jbx kernel thread I see lot of positive things after drtail incorporating it to his work.
I don't know what to think if this kernel is good on general omap4 without more tweaks or only on droid 4?
trying to merge parts of 3.4 or greater should be considered ? or is waste of time as I achieved my goals with this (except hdmi).
thank you for your input !
Regards
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i will try this kernel sir, what governor and i/o scheduler available on this kernel sir? can instal on any rom? sorry for asking many question
lucize said:
I would like to know if someone else is having bad experience whit this (regarding to standby and not heavy usage, because lacking 100 mhz support), over jbx kernel thread I see lot of positive things after drtail incorporating it to his work.
I don't know what to think if this kernel is good on general omap4 without more tweaks or only on droid 4?
trying to merge parts of 3.4 or greater should be considered ? or is waste of time as I achieved my goals with this (except hdmi).
thank you for your input !
Regards
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This kernel, JBX and also the Moto stock kernel are true hybrids. Means that there are many backports from higher kernel versions, like 3.4, 3.7, etc. In JBX are addituional backports from 3.8, 3.10, 3.11. In fact these kernels are very mixed Btw: Currenlty patching JBX to 3.0.72 --> 3.0.88.
dtrail1 said:
This kernel, JBX and also the Moto stock kernel are true hybrids. Means that there are many backports from higher kernel versions, like 3.4, 3.7, etc. In JBX are addituional backports from 3.8, 3.10, 3.11. In fact these kernels are very mixed Btw: Currenlty patching JBX to 3.0.72 --> 3.0.88.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just... amazing. How are you all so overpowered/extremely talented?
Sent from the Ace's MB865 using Tapatalk
Aceofzeroz said:
Just... amazing. How are you all so overpowered/extremely talented?
Sent from the Ace's MB865 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, that's about 2 years of constant learning C code and not giving it up.. :laugh: And kind of a iron will to make things work like imagined before.. LOL
But there's still a LOT of stuff to learn even for me! People like Hashcode seem to have a brain, bigger than a whole football field... :silly:
dtrail1 said:
Well, that's about 2 years of constant learning C code and not giving it up.. :laugh: And kind of a iron will to make things work like imagined before.. LOL
But there's still a LOT of stuff to learn even for me! People like Hashcode seem to have a brain, bigger than a whole football field... :silly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOOOOL, you have a point there! He makes mainframe computers look like toys. xD We all still have a lot to learn, but the little we contribute can mean the world to others, thank you.
Sent from the Ace's MB865 using Tapatalk
dtrail1 said:
This kernel, JBX and also the Moto stock kernel are true hybrids. Means that there are many backports from higher kernel versions, like 3.4, 3.7, etc. In JBX are addituional backports from 3.8, 3.10, 3.11. In fact these kernels are very mixed Btw: Currenlty patching JBX to 3.0.72 --> 3.0.88.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I first started with nexus 101 but hashcode told me to rebase it to omapzoom 31, anyway they are getting the code to mainline kernel after we and other omapzoom users test it's stability
the goal is to have a better kernel in CM by standard and I don't know if your approach would be accepted, that's why I try to remain on the "vanilla" version but I don't know if the approach is good because lack of user input from other omap4 platforms.
every razr user is using your kernel ?
as I see there is ducati binary for 3.4 kernel so trying something wouldn't hurt but I'm starting to be busy and it took me almost a month to make 31 as you see it
Regards
lucize said:
I first started with nexus 101 but hashcode told me to rebase it to omapzoom 31, anyway they are getting the code to mainline kernel after we and other omapzoom users test it's stability
the goal is to have a better kernel in CM by standard and I don't know if your approach would be accepted, that's why I try to remain on the "vanilla" version but I don't know if the approach is good because lack of user input from other omap4 platforms.
every razr user is using your kernel ?
as I see there is ducati binary for 3.4 kernel so trying something wouldn't hurt but I'm starting to be busy and it took me almost a month to make 31 as you see it
Regards
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried this kernel and get a black screen after reboot sir. What iam doing this is wipe dalvik cache-cache-flash this kernel. I am on xt910 umts spyder. By the way thx for developing
aldiandrew said:
I tried this kernel and get a black screen after reboot sir. What iam doing this is wipe dalvik cache-cache-flash this kernel. I am on xt910 umts spyder. By the way thx for developing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
are you using safestrap 3.65 ? if not the files shoul be overwriten in the rom zip
lucize said:
I first started with nexus 101 but hashcode told me to rebase it to omapzoom 31, anyway they are getting the code to mainline kernel after we and other omapzoom users test it's stability
the goal is to have a better kernel in CM by standard and I don't know if your approach would be accepted, that's why I try to remain on the "vanilla" version but I don't know if the approach is good because lack of user input from other omap4 platforms.
every razr user is using your kernel ?
as I see there is ducati binary for 3.4 kernel so trying something wouldn't hurt but I'm starting to be busy and it took me almost a month to make 31 as you see it
Regards
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This ducati version doesn't work for us - unfortunately
Gesendet von meinem XT910 mit Tapatalk 4
Does this revamped kernel address kitkats bluetooth handsfree+assistant bootloops and restarts on all roms?
Crumplet said:
Does this revamped kernel address kitkats bluetooth handsfree+assistant bootloops and restarts on all roms?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
could you elaborate so I can do tests ?
Regards
lucize said:
could you elaborate so I can do tests ?
Regards
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have spoken about this issues a few times in different thread since January of this year, however i will be more then willing to explain the details so that you can maybe reinvent the situation.Rom used "Cyanfox" with and without JBX, using a bluetooth headset along with any assistant program example "Dragon Mobile Assistant" app.Use it and the phone process goes into hearing what you say to the assistant, and that's when the problem occurs.The phone starts to freeze up and the lockups then reboots.If you attempt to do it again it will just repeat the same process every time.That is all i really know.I even tried to use different assistant programs and it would create the same problem.

Optimized Android roms?

Hi everybody, our Kenzo device is getting now more and more stable roms now i am addressing a message to rom builders : why not try to port roms known to be greatly optimized like Ubermallow (successor of optipop for those who know about) source here build with UberTC or Screw'd rom with the brand new DragonTC , the redmi is a powerful device and i really want to see it giving the best. Thanks in advance
Aarch64 devices seem to love custom toolchains : i'm looking around in the nexus6p forum and for Screw'd roms i can see big improvements for their devices , latency reduced , 70k Antutu stock vs 85-90k on Screw'd, that's pretty promising
aaz03 said:
Aarch64 devices seem to love custom toolchains : i'm looking around in the nexus6p forum and for Screw'd roms i can see big improvements for their devices , latency reduced , 70k Antutu stock vs 85-90k on Screw'd, that's pretty promising
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think something is messed up on our phone. It could be way faster than it is. My old nexus 4 is nearly on the same level of performance, so instead of flooding our forum with ROMs(which isn't bad at all) the devs should more look at the optimisation of the kernel etc.
nexuspur said:
I think something is messed up on our phone. It could be way faster than it is. My old nexus 4 is nearly on the same level of performance, so instead of flooding our forum with ROMs(which isn't bad at all) the devs should more look at the optimisation of the kernel etc.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe Improved Camera Performance?Is that achievable?
Ab Sdr said:
Maybe Improved Camera Performance?Is that achievable?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 for that

Planned to build kernel, but for better stability and battery life, miui or cm?

So my new redmi 3 is on its way. I've chosen this phone over redmi 4a because of kernel source already available. I love tinkering, modifying and compiling kernel. But before doing so, I need to know which rom are stable for daily usage, with better battery life and overall stability, because I'll be compiling the kernel against the rom and I'll be looking into the kernel source while waiting for the phone to arrive.
From my reading on the threads here so far, I understand that miui roms have better battery life than cm roms, is that still true? Is it noticeable better on miui compared to cm? How about stability, are cm roms still buggy?
Thank you for any feedback :highfive:
LineageOS ?
Inviato dal mio Redmi 3 utilizzando Tapatalk
CM ROMs are really really stable. For me, they feel more stable than MIUI simply because some of the MIUI modifications make some apps bug out (like the battery saver and notification shade).
On the battery side, though, MIUI is way ahead of CM in terms of battery. The hotplug in CM ROMs is INCREDIBLY bad. The one in the latest LineageOS build is always keeping 1 BIG core active (that's the default setting for it) and turns on BIG cores at any touch of the screen. Previous builds had no hotplug, and other CM-based ROMs have some horrible hotplug who turns on little cores and high demand and always keeps the BIG ones active. All of them. Seriously, some ROMs heat up faster when keeping the phone idle with the screen on than MIUI does with hotspot active.
As a battery comparison, MIUI has like 8-9 minutes/1% and CM had 2-3 minutes/1% (SoT) for light tasks. It's now better for CM, like 5-6 minutes, but still a lot behind.
Since you want to modify the kernel, the above battery issue is something you might want to modify, though. You could even get some contributions for LineageOS to make it better for everyone.
vlt96 said:
CM ROMs are really really stable. For me, they feel more stable than MIUI simply because some of the MIUI modifications make some apps bug out (like the battery saver and notification shade).
On the battery side, though, MIUI is way ahead of CM in terms of battery. The hotplug in CM ROMs is INCREDIBLY bad. The one in the latest LineageOS build is always keeping 1 BIG core active (that's the default setting for it) and turns on BIG cores at any touch of the screen. Previous builds had no hotplug, and other CM-based ROMs have some horrible hotplug who turns on little cores and high demand and always keeps the BIG ones active. All of them. Seriously, some ROMs heat up faster when keeping the phone idle with the screen on than MIUI does with hotspot active.
As a battery comparison, MIUI has like 8-9 minutes/1% and CM had 2-3 minutes/1% (SoT) for light tasks. It's now better for CM, like 5-6 minutes, but still a lot behind.
Since you want to modify the kernel, the above battery issue is something you might want to modify, though. You could even get some contributions for LineageOS to make it better for everyone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for the reply!
The hotplug issue can easily be mitigated by either adding thirdparty hotplug standalone driver or inbuilt in cpu governors. I'm not sure which hotplug implementation does default miui/cm kernel uses, either standalone driver or inbuilt in cpu governor because i dont have the phone yet, but adding thirdparty standalone hotplug driver are definitely in my plan for the kernel. They usually give much more refined control on the cpu core hotplugging mechanism. Plus with thirdparty thermal driver, it should be way better than the default one in those miui/cm kernels.
Actually i like cm based rom better than miui, but reading the cm/mokee/rr threads made me believed that they're more buggy and more battery hungry than miui roms.
nulldash said:
Thank you for the reply!
The hotplug issue can easily be mitigated by either adding thirdparty hotplug standalone driver or inbuilt in cpu governors. I'm not sure which hotplug implementation does default miui/cm kernel uses, either standalone driver or inbuilt in cpu governor because i dont have the phone yet, but adding thirdparty standalone hotplug driver are definitely in my plan for the kernel. They usually give much more refined control on the cpu core hotplugging mechanism. Plus with thirdparty thermal driver, it should be way better than the default one in those miui/cm kernels.
Actually i like cm based rom better than miui, but reading the cm/mokee/rr threads made me believed that they're more buggy and more battery hungry than miui roms.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Buggy, not at all. Battery hungry not really, just that MIUI has better optimisations.
My vote is for CM/Lineage. I am currently on Mokee CM/Lineage Marshmallow. It would be great if there was a hotplug option available.
Please build it for CM/LineageOS
It would be nice if you can add better hotplug driver and options to underclock the GPU for better battery life
@nulldash check PM
Hello,
I'm actually vote for LineageOS based ROMs instead because the kernel source is complete. Xiaomi's official source code doesn't include Prima WiFi driver.
OP, choice is on your hand, and up to you. We could only expect for things to come.
Sent from my ASUS_Z00A using XDA Labs
krasCGQ said:
Hello,
I'm actually vote for LineageOS based ROMs instead because the kernel source is complete. Xiaomi's official source code doesn't include Prima WiFi driver.
OP, choice is on your hand, and up to you. We could only expect for things to come.
Sent from my ASUS_Z00A using XDA Labs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i actually already expected that their original source are incomplete and broken like what they always did with their kernel source release, hence i'm syncing cm14.1 kernel source. unless cm did major changes in their source especially in graphic driver, the kernel would theoretically boot on any lp, mm and n roms if using anykernel zip installer.
already succesfully built the kernel but my phone didnt arrive yet to test :laugh:
nulldash said:
already succesfully built the kernel but my phone didnt arrive yet to test :laugh:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol,
As for AnyKernel2 template, we need to remove BusyBox in order for the template to work correctly. I've uploaded the modified one if people want to use it as the base (it's also a part of my build script).
Sent from my ASUS_Z00A using XDA Labs
I have always wondered how to achieve great camera results with custom Roms. I know it is kind of off-topic, but it would be nice to have a kernel with xiaomi's camera source for lineageOS etc. Though, I have no idea if the kernel source release included camera sources.
George_ioannidis said:
I have always wondered how to achieve great camera results with custom Roms. I know it is kind of off-topic, but it would be nice to have a kernel with xiaomi's camera source for lineageOS etc. Though, I have no idea if the kernel source release included camera sources.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think no. Blame Xiaomi why they release incomplete sources
Sent from my ASUS_Z00A using XDA Labs
I prefer MIUI and I would appreciate the function DT2W (double tap to wake).
The most stable rom I've ever seen is RRemix. Battery life is great and there are no bugs (at least I did not see)
vesi said:
I prefer MIUI and I would appreciate the function DT2W (double tap to wake).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is already a kernel for miui with dt2w. I would like one for lineage with dt2w
Enviado desde mi Redmi 3 mediante Tapatalk
could anyone upload, or just paste the content of /system/etc/init.qcom.post_boot.sh please? if want to paste please use code tags to preserve whitespace
nulldash said:
could anyone upload, or just paste the content of /system/etc/init.qcom.post_boot.sh please? if want to paste please use code tags to preserve whitespace
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm on lineage official nightly, can't find what are you looking for
ainurrofiq said:
I'm on lineage official nightly, can't find what are you looking for
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's on the root of the ramdisk.
Sent from my ASUS_Z00A using XDA Labs
krasCGQ said:
It's on the root of the ramdisk.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So I have to unpack boot.img first?
I'll send boot image for you
---------- Post added 26th January 2017 at 12:23 AM ---------- Previous post was 25th January 2017 at 11:56 PM ----------
ainurrofiq said:
So I have to unpack boot.img first?
I'll send boot image for you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4H7TUQI5FnxSU8tZEVKam83a0E/view?usp=sharing

When will V30 got Energy Aware Scheduling (EAS) supporting kernel?

After seeing these 2 links out there I refuse to buy V30 as long as it has outdated kernel without sched governor support
What do you think?
Then don't get it. I'm going to.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Request a dev add it.
We'll have custom kernels.
ChazzMatt said:
Request a dev add it.
We'll have custom kernels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. I don't want to drop $840 for top-phone and than seek paths to get it hacked, rooted and flash custom kernel in it to get just the same experience which others have in their $400-$550 phones. Like Xiaomis which vendors are fast to deliver modern linux and android kernel enhancements
That's what EAS it for https://forum.xda-developers.com/z5-premium/general/announcement-energy-aware-scheduling-t3620897
I'm willing to bet it doesn't. Pixel devices were the first to launch with it because the code is baked into the AOSP mainline kernel. As much tinkering as every manufacturer does to their device, and the relative newness of this kernel schedule, chances are that it's not.
Sent from my VS995 using Tapatalk
ChazzMatt said:
Request a dev add it.
We'll have custom kernels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Billy Madison said:
No. I don't want to drop $840 for top-phone and than seek paths to get it hacked, rooted and flash custom kernel in it to get just the same experience which others have in their $400-$550 phones. Like Xiaomis which vendors are fast to deliver modern linux and android kernel enhancements
That's what EAS it for https://forum.xda-developers.com/z5-premium/general/announcement-energy-aware-scheduling-t3620897
(This below is a quote from post #1 of that link, so this is what he wants you to read... I'm posting it so you don't have to go there. But feel free to click the link anyway if you wish.)
PDesire said:
In help with @zacharias.maladroit we ported Energy Aware Scheduling (EAS) to our Xperia Z5 Premium
The benefits I already see:
The CPU is really cooler (that what Snapdragon 810 needed)
The idle time has been increased ALOT (like 50% more idle time)
Also it seems battery life has been improved alot
The Port repo:
https://github.com/PDesire/XperiaSatsukiEliteKernel/commits/hotplug
Stay Tuned, this kernel will go online soon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Too funny. The link you just posted was a dev ADDING it to a Sony Experia Z5 custom kernel -- just like I said could be done easily for our LG V30 (if it doesn't have it already).
You proved my point.
Tbh why everyone wants EAS ? To have a ****ty Scheduler implementation provided by CodeAurora and get disappointed by it ?
The only device which works very well with EAS is the Pixel, and do you know why ? They don't use the CodeAurora implementation, they use their own one. And to use Google's implementation you need Google kernels and not kernels which are based on CAF (like most Snapdragon kernels are).
So keep with HMP, it's not bad like everyone is thinking
Your PDesire
Whats next? To blame the V30 cause it wont include itunes.. (-_-)
PDesire said:
Tbh why everyone wants EAS ? To have a ****ty Scheduler implementation provided by CodeAurora and get disappointed by it ?
The only device which works very well with EAS is the Pixel, and do you know why ? They don't use the CodeAurora implementation, they use their own one. And to use Google's implementation you need Google kernels and not kernels which are based on CAF (like most Snapdragon kernels are).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, mate. I see that you know vastly more than I do in android development space
But please look at that
Even if not look into second run which V30 supposedly loose due to 4Gb onboard vs 6Gb the first round speed is also pathetic. And this link in OP is telling us of very much improved kernel in Galaxy Note 8 compared with all previous generations of Touchwiz and Samsung kernels. Samsung was a beaten boy for it's proverbial lage but it is no more. While LG is becoming the most laughed at Android vendor with it's stutters, lags and hiccups every one complaining about. LG doesn't do nothing to improve in that space, what leads to frustrated and disgruntled customers hence loss continuing for 12 quarters loss of sales and market share. With that pace LG is gonna vanish and be sold to Google as ODM like HTC at best
Does Oreo for V30 support Energy Aware Scheduling (EAS) ?

[Kernel] ||Volt|| [OOS]

Features from Volt
Main Tweaks:
CPU OC (2112/2592)
CPU Undervolt (uh numbers are on github)
GPU 180mhz step
GPU Undervolt (by -100mv)
Governors
Alucard
Zzmoove
Cultivation
Blu_active
Tripndroid
I/O Schedulers
Maple
Fiops
Sio
Zen
Misc Features
Dynamic Stune Boost
5,75,175mhz underclock on both clusters
WQ power savings
Backlight dimmer
Sound Control
Boeffla Wakelock Blocker
LED control
Fsync Toggle
Westwood TCP
State Notifier
And other mic tweaks under the hood (all on github)
XDA:DevDB Information
Volt, Kernel for the OnePlus 5T
Contributors
Zombie
Source Code: https://github.com/UndeadDeveloper/Volt-OP5/
Kernel Special Features: Overclock
Version Information
Status: Testing
Created 2018-01-11
Last Updated 2018-01-15
Reserved
First, cheers. GOnna try asap
All the best with your kernel, make it a beast
Ayeeeeeeeeee alright, re-opened. Now, Im working blind on this kernel since I only have the 5 and not the 5T. I would enjoy some testers in my telegram group. Heres the link https://t.me/joinchat/FxSOb0RXgohqVWCKPHha5w
As for people who dont want to join the group and be testers, can you test this real quick and tell me if it boots? https://www.androidfilehost.com/?fid=817906626617958383
Doesnt have any features other than overclock and undervolt, im just seeing if it boots
Zombie said:
Ayeeeeeeeeee alright, re-opened. Now, Im working blind on this kernel since I only have the 5 and not the 5T. I would enjoy some testers in my telegram group. Heres the link https://t.me/joinchat/FxSOb0RXgohqVWCKPHha5w
As for people who dont want to join the group and be testers, can you test this real quick and tell me if it boots? https://www.androidfilehost.com/?fid=817906626617958383
Doesnt have any features other than overclock and undervolt, im just seeing if it boots
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well she boots!! I'm 3 min into testing but it looks and feels good. OC frequencies look to stick!! Will continue testing but looks like a winner on OB1 rooted with Magisk 15.3. Nice job Dev!!
Ideas4ya said:
Well she boots!! I'm 3 min into testing but it looks and feels good. OC frequencies look to stick!! Will continue testing but looks like a winner on OB1 rooted with Magisk 15.3. Nice job Dev!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
After more testing I've noticed the following things...
1) The offscreen gestures may need to be looked at because drawing a V to enable my flashlight didn't work
2) Battery life seems to be substantially less. In 1 hr I lost 7% during idle drain while I was getting ready for work this morning.
3) Everything else seems good to go (wifi, Bluetooth, LTE, OC, etc) all good
Alright here we go. Added the features and it boots. Enjoy kiddos
Volt V1 Is Out!
Includes most if not all of the features listed in op. Cant really remember haha. Been working on 3 kernels today. One issue is that Alucard governor sticks at high frequencies so I wouldnt use that unless youre on a charger all day
Click this totally safe link to download
Is it compatible with Open Beta 2:
http://www.androidpolice.com/2018/01/16/oneplus-5t-open-beta-2/
SlyUK said:
Is it compatible with Open Beta 2:
http://www.androidpolice.com/2018/01/16/oneplus-5t-open-beta-2/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Should work just fine, ill update it later today or tomorrow with ob2 sources when I have the time. Feel free to test it and see if its working right now
V2 IS OUT!!!
Alright V2 is out. If you guys want I might go ahead and make a custom rom kernel too since I have one for the 5.
Update: Updated for latest open beta
Download Here
Zombie said:
V2 IS OUT!!!
Alright V2 is out. If you guys want I might go ahead and make a custom rom kernel too since I have one for the 5.
Update: Updated for latest open beta
Download Here
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you!
I want a custom rom kernel! !
Zombie said:
V2 IS OUT!!!
Alright V2 is out. If you guys want I might go ahead and make a custom rom kernel too since I have one for the 5.
Update: Updated for latest open beta
Download Here
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would greatly appreciate that as I am running DU for weeks now, thanks bud
@Zombie Custom rom Volt kernel would be amazing, if convenient and you have the time to do
I posted this one the 5 forums and so im just going to link it here
https://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=76210645&postcount=174
Zombie said:
I posted this one the 5 forums and so im just going to link it here
https://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=76210645&postcount=174
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will you have an XDA thread for Volt Kernel on the OP 6 forums, if possible.
SlyUK said:
Will you have an XDA thread for Volt Kernel on the OP 6 forums, if possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe, If I do im not sure how long it will remain active. Right now im just planning on using Singularity, getting overclocking and maybe possibly undervolt working and then ill just publish the commits for everyone to use, theres just a lot going on in life and I don't have the time or energy to maintain a kernel.
Zombie said:
Maybe, If I do im not sure how long it will remain active. Right now im just planning on using Singularity, getting overclocking and maybe possibly undervolt working and then ill just publish the commits for everyone to use, theres just a lot going on in life and I don't have the time or energy to maintain a kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah that no problem

Categories

Resources