Can anyone help me to choose between AEX and Slim?
What is your reason why I should choose (it)?
What about performance and battery?
Does Slim use a small update? Not one full ROM?
Or can you convince me to go with another ROM? And what is your reason for that?
Actually I wait DU / Los-Official but for DU is very difficult. And I hope that Los will soon get Official.
On the other hand, I am very happy with the return of PA and,or GzR_Family. However I see it does not get Official.
Why do I see Official? Because to me that Official is a very convincing development to use. I do not like to move from one to another with fast time.
What about DU? From the first I was so confident with DU. However I do not expect much for other developers who have been busy.
Thanks for your attention, forgive me with language, purpose, and more.
vyvy said:
Can anyone help me to choose between AEX and Slim? ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I went through the process you are going through now, trying to decide which custom ROM to move to.
After drawing up a shortlist, I tried Slim 2 days ago. Slim was perfectly fine. Battery performance seemed better than MultiPro 8.2.5.0 (MM) which I had been using. I installed OctOS yesterday. There is much similarity between OctOS and Slim, but I find OctOS more to my liking (for one, it is not so "slim" as Slim, which IMHO, was too minimalistic - but of course, that it how it got its name). I am still testing OctOS, and will give it another day or two.
From my brief experience with both, each of them is pretty good, fluid, etc. I could not see much objective difference, and I do not think that one is "better" than the other - much depends on individual preferences relating to "eye candy" (ie, the "look and feel" of the ROM). If OctOS passes all the tests of what I need, I will probably stay with it. But I do have a full nandroid backup of Slim, in case I change my mind.
The reason I abandoned MIUI is because of my concerns that various things in MIUI might be "phoning home". I will not return to MIUI. So, for me, it is Slim or OctOS. In my view, the core OS in AOSP and LOS based ROMs is not going to be very different. The rest is about eye candy. I don't think I will test any other custom ROM (life is too short ...).
DarthJabba9 said:
I went through the process you are going through now, trying to decide which custom ROM to move to.
After drawing up a shortlist, I tried Slim 2 days ago. Slim was perfectly fine. Battery performance seemed better than MultiPro 8.2.5.0 (MM) which I had been using. I installed OctOS yesterday. There is much similarity between OctOS and Slim, but I find OctOS more to my liking (for one, it is not so "slim" as Slim, which IMHO, was too minimalistic - but of course, that it how it got its name). I am still testing OctOS, and will give it another day or two.
From my brief experience with both, each of them is pretty good, fluid, etc. I could not see much objective difference, and I do not think that one is "better" than the other - much depends on individual preferences relating to "eye candy" (ie, the "look and feel" of the ROM). If OctOS passes all the tests of what I need, I will probably stay with it. But I do have a full nandroid backup of Slim, in case I change my mind.
The reason I abandoned MIUI is because of my concerns that various things in MIUI might be "phoning home". I will not return to MIUI. So, for me, it is Slim or OctOS. In my view, the core OS in AOSP and LOS based ROMs is not going to be very different. The rest is about eye candy. I don't think I will test any other custom ROM (life is too short ...).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ohh..Thanks a lot of time you spend.
In your experience above, I see you are not talking about AEX? Why it? Have you not tried yet?
With respect to Oct-os, I think my choice still falls to Slim, helped by your summary above. Because I'm not too close to (sort of Octos, AIM, DnD, and some others). For base Los, I prefer Mokee or Aicp and last RR (I never tried for this). And I've been using Aokp for a long time.However, all ROMs are on the basis of Los, I am not satisfied because Kernel-3rd is not available yet. I do not know since when I rely heavily on (dt2w and kcal).
Finally, I would be very happy if in the next two days, you will describe your experience with Octos.
DarthJabba9 said:
There is much similarity between OctOS and Slim, but I find OctOS more to my liking (for one, it is not so "slim" as Slim, which IMHO, was too minimalistic - but of course, that it how it got its name)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
could you please make a quick list, which features are missing in Slim, OctOS got? I'm facing the same decision between these 2 OSs.
Thanks
vyvy said:
Finally, I would be very happy if in the next two days, you will describe your experience with Octos.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^^this
mirosz said:
could you please make a quick list, which features are missing in Slim, OctOS got? I'm facing the same decision between these 2 OSs.
Thanks
^^this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why do not you talk about RR? With many features available? And I think there are many users here using RR?
Not yet any rock solid stable AOSP rom for our mido. All of them have some quirks here and there. I've tried RR, Lineage OS, Slim, Paranoid, AEX and XOSP. Slim is the best for me. It's so clean and minimalistic. When all bugs get squashed, it will be the perfect choice. Of course ymmv.
@vyvy I have not tried AEX. It did not make my shortlist (which was Halogen, Legend, OctOS, Slim, and Viper). I am sure that it is perfectly fine - it just didn't make my shortlist (the problem is too many ROMs to choose from - this is a very good problem). As I said, Slim is perfectly fine. It met all my requirements (after my own favorite 3rd party apps were installed) - which is why I have kept a full nandroid backup of it.
I have had plenty of time to test OctOS. It also meets all my requirements after all my favorite apps were installed. The final test was hands-free bluetooth phone calls in my car. I believe I will stay with OctOS.
@mirosz Unfortunately, I am unable to make a list of what was missing in Slim, because I did not keep records. As far as I can remember, there was no feature that was missing - just one or two apps that I expected to find in a custom ROM (which TBH, I cannot remember what they were). It was not a big problem, and I would have happily stayed with Slim. However, I decided to try another one on my shortlist, which was OctOS. And I do like it more.
BTW, in all my ROMs, I always replace the default launcher with Nova ...
---------- Post added at 02:42 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:37 PM ----------
vyvy said:
... I am not satisfied because Kernel-3rd is not available yet ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, there is this 3rd-party kernel.
Brother, use xperience ROM (CAF Based) or ANY CAF Based ROM
its way faster than any LOS based rom
Trust me.
Thingol1 said:
Not yet any rock solid stable AOSP rom for our mido. All of them have some quirks here and there. I've tried RR, Lineage OS, Slim, Paranoid, AEX and XOSP. Slim is the best for me. It's so clean and minimalistic. When all bugs get squashed, it will be the perfect choice. Of course ymmv.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then how are the two? AEX and Slim? Can you convince me to move to Slim?
DarthJabba9 said:
@vyvy I have not tried AEX. It did not make my shortlist (which was Halogen, Legend, OctOS, Slim, and Viper). I am sure that it is perfectly fine - it just didn't make my shortlist (the problem is too many ROMs to choose from - this is a very good problem). As I said, Slim is perfectly fine. It met all my requirements (after my own favorite 3rd party apps were installed) - which is why I have kept a full nandroid backup of it.
I have had plenty of time to test OctOS. It also meets all my requirements after all my favorite apps were installed. The final test was hands-free bluetooth phone calls in my car. I believe I will stay with OctOS.
@mirosz Unfortunately, I am unable to make a list of what was missing in Slim, because I did not keep records. As far as I can remember, there was no feature that was missing - just one or two apps that I expected to find in a custom ROM (which TBH, I cannot remember what they were). It was not a big problem, and I would have happily stayed with Slim. However, I decided to try another one on my shortlist, which was OctOS. And I do like it more.
BTW, in all my ROMs, I always replace the default launcher with Nova ...
---------- Post added at 02:42 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:37 PM ----------
Well, there is this 3rd-party kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay, thanks brother. I will try Slim first.
To be honest I only have one phone, and the only thing to do every day, even when I work. Of course I will be careful in choosing, because I also do not really like MIUI, I can not write more details, that's just the fact that.
Yes, brother. I read the comment there that the kernel is for now only support for AOSP-based ROM. I will follow it, and hopefully the future will be many more, available kernels
asusm930 said:
Brother, use xperience ROM (CAF Based) or ANY CAF Based ROM
its way faster than any LOS based rom
Trust me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lastly I use CAF base, it's with Citrus and Halogen.I think you are right to say so. I'm sorry, but for now, I'm not ready to try it it's because, i see some CAF base ROM is not too many users, and i think for bugs and patching will be very slow.
vyvy said:
Then how are the two? AEX and Slim? Can you convince me to move to Slim?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have experienced longer boot times and occasional lags on AEX. Slim is fast and fluid for me. It is for people who just want a clean and empty rom with few carefully selected extra additions. It's not for RR lovers that desire every extra functionality.
Thingol1 said:
I have experienced longer boot times and occasional lags on AEX. Slim is fast and fluid for me. It is for people who just want a clean and empty rom with few carefully selected extra additions. It's not for RR lovers that desire every extra functionality.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay, Thanks for the exposure. I will try it.
can anyone review of CAF based ROM i.e. Hallogen, Xperience available ryt now compared to RR & AEX?
itsmedRb said:
can anyone review of CAF based ROM i.e. Hallogen, Xperience available ryt now compared to RR & AEX?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Xperience is super smooth, one of the best among all the custom roms that I have tried.
The only gripe that I had with it was that fingerprint scanner did not work for me. I'm accustomed to waking up the device using the scanner so it became a deal-breaker for me.
Based on recommendations in this thread, I'm trying out OctOS and liking it a lot. It is definitely smoother than RR and AEX. The other rom that I really liked was Legend. Its pretty good and stable in terms of performance.
After a week with OctOS, I have moved back to Slim. The main reason is that Slim seems to have much better battery performance during idle/sleep time (SOT is not too different). But there is another reason - issues with WhatsApp notifications when using OctOS (messages not being received until I actually open WhatsApp) - installing an app "PNF Root" helped somewhat, but things were still erratic and unpredictable. This second reason may just be my own isolated experience, because I have not yet seem any other OctOS user complaining about this problem. However, for me, it was a real pain in the backside. So, I think I will now stay with Slim.
Yeah!
'Because less is more'
Related
This is not a thread for "which one is better."
I've not found anywhere in the i777 forums a description of how the two AOSP roms relate in similarities and differences, something I believe would be a common question.
From my googling, it appears that AOKP has all of the same features as CM9, just with a different interface.
Those of you who know best: care to share your wisdom of other differences?
From what I've seen, AOKP is kind of a smaller project than CM in terms of device coverage, but that allows them to implement more features it seems. I found a pretty quick and simple write-up here: http://knowmydroid.com/blog/what-is-aokp-rom-how-is-it-different-from-cm9
I tried them both, I'm staying with AOKP
tysj said:
From what I've seen, AOKP is kind of a smaller project than CM in terms of device coverage, but that allows them to implement more features it seems. I found a pretty quick and simple write-up here: http://knowmydroid.com/blog/what-is-aokp-rom-how-is-it-different-from-cm9
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great article!
Thanks for the thread, OP. I had been wondering this myself. I would like to use stock ICS (a la Galaxy Nexus) on my gs2, but CM9 and AOKP seem as close as I'm going to get for now (unless it's out there and I'm just not seeing it). Regardless, CM9 was giving me fits with a couple of games that I like to play and I used AOKP for a couple of hours, but that's about it. I'm not sure which is closer to stock ICS, but I'm told that CM9 is.
College kids nowadays, are so smart. Good for them.
Great read. Im leaning more towards AOKP. Been running Tasks rom for a few days and im loving it.
I did use cm9 for a while but now on AOKP and just loving it
It's really very snappy and great battery life
Task did a wonderful job
I've leaned more towards using AOKP, it's speedy, feature packed and more stable in comparison to the CM9 Nightlies. Until there's a stable release, I'm sticking with AOKP.
AOKP is really amazing, it's a great work put by people that care a lot about quality.
CM9 is breakthrough, it's the base pillar of several roms and it has really talented people contributing to it. Without CM support many devices wouldn't have AOSP ICS.
Both are great choices no matter which one you pick.
Fortunately we have great guys like atinm, codeworkx, Entropy and task (among others) that make this happen.
blackplague1347 said:
Thanks for the thread, OP. I had been wondering this myself. I would like to use stock ICS (a la Galaxy Nexus) on my gs2, but CM9 and AOKP seem as close as I'm going to get for now (unless it's out there and I'm just not seeing it). Regardless, CM9 was giving me fits with a couple of games that I like to play and I used AOKP for a couple of hours, but that's about it. I'm not sure which is closer to stock ICS, but I'm told that CM9 is.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I also had this need and came across this.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1601518
This was my first flashed ROM so have nothing to compare to other than stock Sammy Touchwiz'd ICS but it is great. Might just be what you're looking for.
tysj said:
From what I've seen, AOKP is kind of a smaller project than CM in terms of device coverage, but that allows them to implement more features it seems. I found a pretty quick and simple write-up here: http://knowmydroid.com/blog/what-is-aokp-rom-how-is-it-different-from-cm9
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Excellent report, thanks for sharing bro
skblr said:
I did use cm9 for a while but now on AOKP and just loving it
It's really very snappy and great battery life
Task did a wonderful job
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
x2.
Why isnt i777 supported directly by AOKP? Is it because they are on a much smaller scale compared to CM? Will the i777 ever get AOKP direct support at some point? Not that it matters, Task650's Roms is badass as it is but I still wonder why it isnt supported.
I also have used both and I was a huge supporter of CM. I like AOKP better. As it stands right now I think AOKP is more polished and has more features currently. When CM9 comes more along I'm sure it will be equally as good. I flashed CM9 the day before yesterday just to see what progress has been made. I see they merged the custom lockscreen stuff and some other things, but I still found there were some things in AOKP that I missed so I flashed right back to AOKP. The good thing I must say is that both are AOSP and can usually go between the two without wiping data. I went from AOKP, to CM9, back to AOKP without doing a data wipe (just wiped the caches) and everything worked fine
tysj said:
From what I've seen, AOKP is kind of a smaller project than CM in terms of device coverage, but that allows them to implement more features it seems. I found a pretty quick and simple write-up here: http://knowmydroid.com/blog/what-is-aokp-rom-how-is-it-different-from-cm9
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's a good article but it's quite dated given the number of nightly updates since it was written. CM9 has come a long way in terms of features that have been added:
- Theme manager
- Profiles, which allow you to control features available in the power saver option
- Lock screen shortcut configuration
- Galaxy SII specific advanced features
- Performance options OC, governor, etc.
Right now, other than the weather on the notification bar, you can get pretty much get in CM9 the same features in AOKP.
One thing that AOKP doesn't have is the ability to update to the latest nightly through ROM Manager in a few (4) clicks. That's is a big plus if you are an update junkie.
In any case my recommendation is that you try them both. It's all a matter of personal choice.
projekt1 said:
Why isnt i777 supported directly by AOKP? Is it because they are on a much smaller scale compared to CM? Will the i777 ever get AOKP direct support at some point? Not that it matters, Task650's Roms is badass as it is but I still wonder why it isnt supported.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's all about kernel sources. The ICS kernel sources have not been released for the i777, so the AOKP team won't touch it.
This might be a silly question, but what exactly are the differences between the three Jellybean ROMs I see in the dev section (Paranoid, CM10, AOKP)?
None of these seem to have any kind of "feature log" or changelog.
Anyone have any insights?
tehkingo said:
This might be a silly question, but what exactly are the differences between the three Jellybean ROMs I see in the dev section (Paranoid, CM10, AOKP)?
None of these seem to have any kind of "feature log" or changelog.
Anyone have any insights?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Paranoid Android Is Jellybean
AOKP....not going there with that one
CMX, Pure build from code. Great rom.
differences, not exactly sure, but most will have a twitter to keep up with changes if possible
leo72793 said:
Paranoid Android Is Jellybean
AOKP....not going there with that one
CMX, Pure build from code. Great rom.
differences, not exactly sure, but most will have a twitter to keep up with changes if possible
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not trying to be a ****, but you kind of didn't answer my question in any way.
a) What's wrong with AOKP?
b) I know Paranoid is JB, that's why I mentioned it. Are you saying it's stock JB? Kinda confused on the wording here.
c) Obviously, you're a fan of CM10 (aka CMX). What makes it so good compared to the other two? I see the thread for it has more posts (and thus seems to be more popular), but why?
Again, I'm not trying to be difficult. Just hoping to get an answer without having to flash 3 different ROMs.
Each ROM has different features.
CM isnt just straight AOSP
Rxpert said:
Each ROM has different features.
CM isnt just straight AOSP
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As much as I am grateful that people are paying attention to this thread and attempting to answer, this is the 2nd non-answer I've received so far.
I know each ROM has different features, that's why I made this thread.
I know CM isn't just straight AOSP.
My issue is that unlike most of the Sense ROMs, these JB ROMs have no feature list at all, and don't even cite any sort of changelog. Thus, I can't make an informed decision on which ROM to flash.
leo72793 said:
Paranoid Android Is Jellybean
AOKP....not going there with that one
CMX, Pure build from code. Great rom.
differences, not exactly sure, but most will have a twitter to keep up with changes if possible
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's like.. not even fully correct.
Please make sure you know what you're talking about before you answer questions, as not knowing the answer will only cause more confusion.
To OP,
Paranoid: Paranoid Android is an AOSP JB ROM that focuses on the fusion of phone mode and tablet mode. Typically putting a phone into tablet mode would be cool, but some features of tablet mode just don't work that well on a phone. So they've worked on making the tablet mode experience work better on a phone. You can read more about it here.
AOKP: AOKP (Android Open Kang Project) is a highly customized AOSP build that is somewhat similar to CM in that it has a lot of tweaks available to it. AOKP actually has a bit more customization than CM, allowing you to center the clock, add the day of the week to the clock, weather in your notification menu, and a few other neat tricks. You can read more about it here.
CM10: CyanogenMod is the most popular custom Android ROM around, with a very large user base. It supports many different devices. We just recently received official support, meaning we will get official releases and nightlies on a daily basis. This is a plus for CM, because we don't have official support for AOKP and Paranoid, which means we might not always get the newest updates. While it has less ability for customization than AOKP, CM is still a very solid AOSP ROM. You can read more about it here.
All three are great ROMs, and at this point they have mostly the same bugs. I would personally suggest CM10 because the development for it is a bit more active and I've noticed better battery life and less buggyness while running that over AOKP.
SoraX64 said:
That's like.. not even fully correct.
Please make sure you know what you're talking about before you answer questions, as not knowing the answer will only cause more confusion.
To OP,
Paranoid: Paranoid Android is an AOSP JB ROM that focuses on the fusion of phone mode and tablet mode. Typically putting a phone into tablet mode would be cool, but some features of tablet mode just don't work that well on a phone. So they've worked on making the tablet mode experience work better on a phone. You can read more about it here.
AOKP: AOKP (Android Open Kang Project) is a highly customized AOSP build that is somewhat similar to CM in that it has a lot of tweaks available to it. AOKP actually has a bit more customization than CM, allowing you to center the clock, add the day of the week to the clock, weather in your notification menu, and a few other neat tricks. You can read more about it here.
CM10: CyanogenMod is the most popular custom Android ROM around, with a very large user base. It supports many different devices. We just recently received official support, meaning we will get official releases and nightlies on a daily basis. This is a plus for CM, because we don't have official support for AOKP and Paranoid, which means we might not always get the newest updates. While it has less ability for customization than AOKP, CM is still a very solid AOSP ROM. You can read more about it here.
All three are great ROMs, and at this point they have mostly the same bugs. I would personally suggest CM10 because the development for it is a bit more active and I've noticed better battery life and less buggyness while running that over AOKP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks you so much for your in-depth answer.
I'll do some more research with the provided links, and will probably flash something tonight.
Thanks again.
tehkingo said:
Thanks you so much for your in-depth answer.
I'll do some more research with the provided links, and will probably flash something tonight.
Thanks again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No problem. I would suggest trying them all, since there are differences between each of them.
tehkingo said:
As much as I am grateful that people are paying attention to this thread and attempting to answer, this is the 2nd non-answer I've received so far.
I know each ROM has different features, that's why I made this thread.
I know CM isn't just straight AOSP.
My issue is that unlike most of the Sense ROMs, these JB ROMs have no feature list at all, and don't even cite any sort of changelog. Thus, I can't make an informed decision on which ROM to flash.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It was directed more twards the poster above me. My pizza got delivered in the middle of typing so I had to go let the guy in. Sorry my post was so short and abrupt.
SoraX did a great job of explaining the main goals/differences between the ROMS>
The reason there isnt a changelog is because at this point the developers are more focused on getting things working 100%. Its the nature of the beast.
Rxpert said:
It was directed more twards the poster above me. My pizza got delivered in the middle of typing so I had to go let the guy in. Sorry my post was so short and abrupt.
SoraX did a great job of explaining the main goals/differences between the ROMS>
The reason there isnt a changelog is because at this point the developers are more focused on getting things working 100%. Its the nature of the beast.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah, gotcha. Sorry for the attitude.
Firstly I'll apologise for making such a thread. Every developer gives their best to make their ROMs, but then there are normal people like me, who doesn't know anything about ROM development :3 if our phones get bricked, we're screwed. This is why I'm creating this thread. Comment away! Thanks in advance
This is why we say do some reading before jumping into flashing and try new things.
I suppose you may not be familiar.
I would have given you a long descriptive answer but I think that will break the essence of testing and some ethics of rom development possibly.
I would say - Start reading the development threads initial posts and try them out. They're quite helpful in finding out how stable it may or may not be.
On the lighter side of it : Ashwin's CM13 or Temasek's CM based ROM might be your best bet.... But like I said earlier there are other ROMS as well.
Sent from my ONE E1003 using Tapatalk
Rishi. said:
On the lighter side of it : Ashwin's CM13 or Temasek's CM based ROM might be your best bet.... But like I said earlier there are other ROMS as well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is more stable, Ashiwn's or Temasek's CM13?
I planned to ask a similar question about what ROM is least buggy so I can use it as daily driver. (I'm most of my time with no internet away from home)
This weekend I spend most of the time reading those topics of the ROMs and haven't decided which one to flash.
Kir3 said:
What is more stable, Ashiwn's or Temasek's CM13?
I planned to ask a similar question about what ROM is least buggy so I can use it as daily driver. (I'm most of my time with no internet away from home)
This weekend I spend most of the time reading those topics of the ROMs and haven't decided which one to flash.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i'd say ashwins, have used both and for now, ashwins has 0 bugs (FOR ME) people are complaining about background noise in calls, they hear the people behind yu as clear as you self etc.etc. but yeah, now you have my opinion.
Hit that Thanks if it deserves it.
for me ashwins is the best also and i have tried most of them.
For me (only my opinion), stock oss is best. Although i hear complaints, personally i don't have any issues. It has been my daily driver since xmas i bought this phone.
Really depends. I recommend you give both AOKP and AOSParadox a try. Both great ROMs.
There really isn't a best.... It depends on ehi you are and how you use your device
Loving the color os experience.. Tried almost all the MM roms available for opx but came back to LP as it is more stable for my daily driver. I need Bluetooth which is better in cm 12.1.
Color os has gr8 battery life and loads of customization... Installation is little tricky though.
Tiongkia said:
For me (only my opinion), stock oss is best. Although i hear complaints, personally i don't have any issues. It has been my daily driver since xmas i bought this phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
If u want smoothness !
After installing gapps and other daily apps , I faced lags in all ROMs except
Purity ROM built 8/4(MM)
Cm12.1 built 11 (LL)
With ecofix!
Acc to me these are the stablest for me !
I use xposed heavily .
I was a bit disappointed after OOS 2.2.1 because Bluetooth is not fix. But after reading this thread, I would more install a third-party app instead of flashing another ROM. OK OOS is not perfect and has less customization than Cyanogen but stability and good camera is a must-have for me. Now, I never flashed my OPX.
Exodus bcoz it use layer + opendelta (no need to fladh full zip when update come) + nightly!
Kir3 said:
What is more stable, Ashiwn's or Temasek's CM13?
I planned to ask a similar question about what ROM is least buggy so I can use it as daily driver. (I'm most of my time with no internet away from home)
This weekend I spend most of the time reading those topics of the ROMs and haven't decided which one to flash.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I prefer Temasek's rom. It's pretty much stable as I haven't encountered any considerable Issues so far.
Sent from my ONE E1003 using Tapatalk
I don't know what to go now, CM customization or go for AOSP ROM and customize it with Xposed. I probably install xposed on both one so idk....
sam0056 said:
for me ashwins is the best also and i have tried most of them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is ashwins being actively developed? In the thread it's seems stagnant and no updates in the changelog for a while.
mokee coz of aegis (+ the rom is rock stable & smooth)
CrDroid with Blue Spark Kernel. Almost no bugs , pure AOSP experience. Cyanogen Tweaks. The way an Android is meant to be IMO
MoKee has been pretty good to me, and Aegis is an insane battery saver. I don't like to have too much bloat when it comes to Xposed and such so having just one great saver is awesome.
I do want to try out other ROMs though, and ColorOS might be my next stop.
RJMacReady said:
MoKee has been pretty good to me, and Aegis is an insane battery saver. I don't like to have too much bloat when it comes to Xposed and such so having just one great saver is awesome.
I do want to try out other ROMs though, and ColorOS might be my next stop.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've just tried MoKee and unfortunately, Titanium Backup is not working. And Root Explorer is crashed
namquang93 said:
I've just tried MoKee and unfortunately, Titanium Backup is not working. And Root Explorer is crashed
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
have u flashed the latest supersu on mokee? then titanium backup works fine
There are so much Custom ROMS for Redmi Note 3[QC] . But all of those are much similar to each another there's nothing new in there, not even any unique features. SO THIS IS A REQUEST TO DEVELOPERS TO PLEASE MAKE SOMETHING NEW & UNIQUE. I KNOW THERE ARE MANY PEOPLE OUT THERE WHO WANT THIS, I AM NOT THE ONLY ONE WITH THIS ISSUE
PLUS I MUST SAY ONE THING THE JOB THAT DEVS ARE DOING FOR US I MEAN LIKE PORTING ROMS AND KERNELS, MAKING NEW MODS, FIXING BUGS(WHICH IS REALLY TOUGH) ETC. WITHOUT BEING PAID FOR THEIR TERRIFIC WORK. THAT'S JUST AWESOME AND I AM VERY THANKFUL TO THEM ALL .
And meanwhile if anyone can suggest me a good custom ROM for our Beast RN3[QC] . That would be very thankful:angel::highfive::good:.
Thanx in Advance.
Developers make their rom in their free time without being paid so its really not respectful to demand more when someone is giving you something for free. There are lots of roms for redmi note 3 that you can try many cm based roms, miui roms many custom kernels i havn't tried all of them but its a good thing that so much development happens here.
Now a days You can pretty much add any feature you like to a rom with xposed. So when a dev makes a nice smooth rom be greatful and enjoy what you got for free
B!GBOY said:
Developers make their rom in their free time without being paid so its really not respectful to demand more when someone is giving you something for free. There are lots of roms for redmi note 3 that you can try many cm based roms, miui roms many custom kernels i havn't tried all of them but its a good thing that so much development happens here.
Now a days You can pretty much add any feature you like to a rom with xposed. So when a dev makes a nice smooth rom be greatful and enjoy what you got for free
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is that okay buddy
B!GBOY said:
Developers make their rom in their free time without being paid so its really not respectful to demand more when someone is giving you something for free. There are lots of roms for redmi note 3 that you can try many cm based roms, miui roms many custom kernels i havn't tried all of them but its a good thing that so much development happens here.
Now a days You can pretty much add any feature you like to a rom with xposed. So when a dev makes a nice smooth rom be greatful and enjoy what you got for free
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mokee! Release. Notification, FP yet to find bugs and no battery bugs. Nice AOSP style rom. So good I donated to remove ads in mokee center.
i would love to have a stable MM rom... tried some cm12 roms and slim6, all get reboots.
Is Mokee stable?
gozzaa said:
i would love to have a stable MM rom... tried some cm12 roms and slim6, all get reboots.
Is Mokee stable?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mokee ROM is the most stable rom
Kanth's said:
Mokee ROM is the most stable rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree. :good:
Unofficial RR is the most stable. There is NO bugs. Everything is working.
nicknameaqui said:
Unofficial RR is the most stable. There is NO bugs. Everything is working.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can I have the link plz?
There's no such thing as "best rom". Intresting to see peoples comments on various roms though.
I'm currently on bliss, and it's f-ing awesome, especialy paired with arcus for theaming joy.
RR 5.7.0 and 5.7.1 have the -2% or 50% battery bug, both of them.
I tested in 2 units RedMi Note 3 Pro SnapDragon 3GB 32GB and both of them show the same behavior with ResurrectionRemix 5.7.0 and 5.7.1:
After rebooting for first time battery is stuck in -2% or 50%. Otherwise the phone works well, battery actually charges.
If you are luck you will get the 50% instance of the issue, that only results in the uncertainty of "how much juice do I have left?".
If you get the -2%, additionally to the uncertainty, you will have all the annoyances related to the phone thinking it has no-juice: popups, no flash, etc...
If you can live with those, RR is fine and stable.
SKDesignsuccw said:
Can I have the link plz?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/red...om-resurrection-remix-m-redmi-note-3-t3394168
otura said:
RR 5.7.0 and 5.7.1 have the -2% or 50% battery bug, both of them.
I tested in 2 units RedMi Note 3 Pro SnapDragon 3GB 32GB and both of them show the same behavior with ResurrectionRemix 5.7.0 and 5.7.1:
After rebooting for first time battery is stuck in -2% or 50%. Otherwise the phone works well, battery actually charges.
If you are luck you will get the 50% instance of the issue, that only results in the uncertainty of "how much juice do I have left?".
If you get the -2%, additionally to the uncertainty, you will have all the annoyances related to the phone thinking it has no-juice: popups, no flash, etc...
If you can live with those, RR is fine and stable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks bro, will try it out. :highfive:
Kanth's said:
Mokee ROM is the most stable rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since putting Mokee on haven't bothered with anything else, hell I even donated.
IR, notifications, FP all working 76000+ Antutu. Flashed with GApps.
Nice AOSP feel, some extras nothing over the top and stable.
sssaini007 said:
There are so much Custom ROMS for Redmi Note 3[QC] . But all of those are much similar to each another there's nothing new in there, not even any unique features. SO THIS IS A REQUEST TO DEVELOPERS TO PLEASE MAKE SOMETHING NEW & UNIQUE. I KNOW THERE ARE MANY PEOPLE OUT THERE WHO WANT THIS, I AM NOT THE ONLY ONE WITH THIS ISSUE
PLUS I MUST SAY ONE THING THE JOB THAT DEVS ARE DOING FOR US I MEAN LIKE PORTING ROMS AND KERNELS, MAKING NEW MODS, FIXING BUGS(WHICH IS REALLY TOUGH) ETC. WITHOUT BEING PAID FOR THEIR TERRIFIC WORK. THAT'S JUST AWESOME AND I AM VERY THANKFUL TO THEM ALL .
And meanwhile if anyone can suggest me a good custom ROM for our Beast RN3[QC] . That would be very thankful:angel::highfive::good:.
Thanx in Advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with you. All of the roms are the same. Even mooke isn't much different from CM these days. DU is just a copy of RR. All of them are the same, nothing unique.
I also would like to see something amazing.
Sent from Note 3, Xiaomi Redmi Note 3.
If you want something different you can try flymeos from Meizu. They create official flyme for redmi note 3 snapdragon.
http://www.flyme.cn/firmwarelist-51.html#7
Still beta but ok for daily usage. Imo, quite bloated but its UI is smoother than MIUI, fp work, IR blaster work, gps lock fast, battery comparable with cm/miui.
Minus are a little animations glitch, some not translate to English.
Sent from my Redmi Note 3 using Tapatalk
Guys which is the best andriod pie rom for oneplus x right now please help me decide
Thanks
I'd go for Yume's LOS.
Last update from 14th oct.
But some new stuffs are out right now, with little things to fix.
Thanks using lemon pie right noe its rly good
Maybe I'm blind, but somehow I cannot find the thread for Yume's LOS16 here. Can you help me with a link? Thanks!
bigapple8 said:
Maybe I'm blind, but somehow I cannot find the thread for Yume's LOS16 here. Can you help me with a link? Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can find all the Pie ROM's for OPX by Yume in this link.
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B36BEwJrvdFMMFJlZ25MdEVMazg?usp=sharing
Right now POSP rom.... very good...
Do u mean potato open sauce project ? I'm using lemon pie right now should i switch to potato open sauce project ?
Doesn't LOS have broken camera?
conta00 said:
Doesn't LOS have broken camera?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not the 14th oct LOS 16 compiled by Yumemichi
Kéno40 said:
Not the 14th oct LOS 16 compiled by Yumemichi
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that is great ;] I am gonna try it out
Bipnbarsha said:
Do u mean potato open sauce project ? I'm using lemon pie right now should i switch to potato open sauce project ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
for sure....
I think it's possibly too early for people to say (other than by first impressions) as there are a number of new pie ROMs available at the moment. And then there is the matter of personal preferences (I'm not a fan of the Omni ROMs for instance; for me sometimes less is more)
I've not tried POSP as yet so I can't comment on it but I will give it a try at some point soon (I like to give ROMs about a week of trial) For me, I am swayed greatly by the ROM with the latest patch level, regardless of the flavour of the ROM. And so, by consequence, I tend to prefer ROMs that are being actively maintained.
I have tried LOS by YumeMichi's, AOSP EXTENDED by Shahabkhan99 and POSP and the best one so far is YumeMichi's ROM. It is supersmooth, didn't had to fix anything for the one month that I used it, there is no sign of heating. And everything seems stable.
AOSP extended as per most of the users using it say that it is the best pie ROM but for me, it seemed laggy, had to fix lots of things but that said it is good to use as daily driver and my experience with it might be also due to me flashing Nano Gapps instead of Pico.
I am currently using POSP but the heating issue is driving me nuts, the battery life too sucks on this one- I am getting SOT of 4 hrs. Only reason I am using this one is OTA updates are available, looks beautiful and there is no lag and as such and seems like a complete ROM as from the ONE PLUS company itself
urban legend2 said:
I have tried LOS by YumeMichi's, AOSP EXTENDED by Shahabkhan99 and POSP and the best one so far is YumeMichi's ROM. It is supersmooth, didn't had to fix anything for the one month that I used it, there is no sign of heating. And everything seems stable.
AOSP extended as per most of the users using it say that it is the best pie ROM but for me, it seemed laggy, had to fix lots of things but that said it is good to use as daily driver and my experience with it might be also due to me flashing Nano Gapps instead of Pico.
I am currently using POSP but the heating issue is driving me nuts, the battery life too sucks on this one- I am getting SOT of 4 hrs. Only reason I am using this one is OTA updates are available, looks beautiful and there is no lag and as such and seems like a complete ROM as from the ONE PLUS company itself
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try RR too.
Kéno40 said:
Try RR too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm back on YumeMichi's LOS , 30th Jan build.
What's the SOT like on RR.?
urban legend2 said:
I'm back on YumeMichi's LOS , 30th Jan build.
What's the SOT like on RR.?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Comparing SOT between 2 users is irrelevant IMO, because depends too much of individual use.
But comparing to what I have on others Pie builds, it seems "normal".
Kéno40 said:
Comparing SOT between 2 users is irrelevant IMO, because depends too much of individual use.
But comparing to what I have on others Pie builds, it seems "normal".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK...
Thank You
I think I've tried all the currently available pie ROMs and I think the best one (for me) is shahabkhan99's AOSP Extended
https://forum.xda-developers.com/oneplus-x/development/rom-aosp-extended-rom-v6-3-t3909017
It's simple, it's smooth and it works; camera, radio, wifi... I haven't yet found a fault. For me, it has the right level configurability & personalisation too.
A few months and rom builds further do we have updated thoughts regarding stability?
winesh said:
A few months and rom builds further do we have updated thoughts regarding stability?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bootleggers, you can read various comments in there.