best ROM for performance and smoothness - Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 Questions & Answers

Hey everyone
I know it's not polite to compare ROMs
But can someone suggest me the best ROM for performance and smoothness?
I don't care about battery or features.
All I need is buttery smooth experience.

AOSP based: Paranoid Android and Omnirom, MIUI based the xiaomi.eu rom
Στάλθηκε από το Redmi Note 4X μου χρησιμοποιώντας Tapatalk

Sjain11 said:
Hey everyone
I know it's not polite to compare ROMs
But can someone suggest me the best ROM for performance and smoothness?
I don't care about battery or features.
All I need is buttery smooth experience.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AOSP CAF based Roms are most smooth
I am on paranoid android

Nirav Tailor said:
AOSP CAF based Roms are most smooth
I am on paranoid android
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I understand AOSP.
but can you explain what's meant by CAF?

CAF stands for the Code Aurora Forum. It's the place where Qualcomm releases source code for their phone processors. It's directly supported by Qualcomm and it's generally a more optimized branch for Snapdragon phones.
Now, there are two mainlines for Qualcomm chipsets. We have CAF, and we have AOSP.
CAF is what Qualcomm provides to all hardware vendors, as references and documentation on the chipset. Because of this, almost all non-Nexus devices are running HALs, kernels, etc from the CAF line.
AOSP is direct from Google. Google will take a fork from the CAF like, and add or retract features that they deem necessary, and then produce that for Nexus phones.
So, what this means is CAF ROMs will likely perform marginally better, but they are lacking features added by Google's AOSP line.

HalogenOS
CAF based.
not sure about the bugs. Last build is 24/06.

LineageOS is also AOSP + CAF based.
Paranoid Android is smoothest for me.

Zile995 said:
LineageOS is also AOSP + CAF based.
Paranoid Android is smoothest for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOS merges CAF a lot slower than CAF dedicated ROMs (like HalogenOS)
LOS adds a lot more foreign code and hacks
If you want Pure CAF, Pure CAF speed, then a Non LOS CAF Rom is the way to go.

Zile995 said:
LineageOS is also AOSP + CAF based.
Paranoid Android is smoothest for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct me if wrong,
But I thought Lineage was the continuation of CM ROMs,an independent entity from AOSP Or CAF.

Paranoid android, period.

asusm930 said:
LOS merges CAF a lot slower than CAF dedicated ROMs (like HalogenOS)
LOS adds a lot more foreign code and hacks
If you want Pure CAF, Pure CAF speed, then a Non LOS CAF Rom is the way to go.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, but they still use some CAF based code in.
Sent from my Redmi Note 4 using Tapatalk

Wow, how about Paranoid Android and Slim ROM?
Which is better? I haven't tried Paranoid Android, but I guess Slim ROM is worth a try. I've been using Slim ROM for a month now. But if Paranoid Android gives more buttery smooth experience, with stability and performance, guess I will try it?

I'm running paranoid android and halogen OS side by side with velvet kernel (governor - blu_active, IO - maple) and both of them are running mighty smooth. Animations are off except for transition set at .75x-1x.
Though I recommended paranoid android earlier, in this setup halogen seems to be ahead. It seems more to do with the kernel settings than anything else.
Edit: battery consumption seems a tad faster in PA.

zenjedi said:
I'm running paranoid android and halogen OS side by side with velvet kernel (governor - blu_active, IO - maple) and both of them are running mighty smooth. Animations are off except for transition set at .75x-1x.
Though I recommended paranoid android earlier, in this setup halogen seems to be ahead. It seems more to do with the kernel settings than anything else.
Edit: battery consumption seems a tad faster in PA.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where do I find the Velvet Kernel?

Hirs_E_Fruit said:
Where do I find the Velvet Kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://www.androidfilehost.com/?w=files&flid=187565

zenjedi said:
https://www.androidfilehost.com/?w=files&flid=187565
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you please share the thread link?
I can't find it.

Sjain11 said:
Can you please share the thread link?
I can't find it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no thread for it.

Ок.
I find that the AOSP rom are mo buggy for me.
I like the future for lineage to change color profile.
I miss this in all other rom.
Halogen rom was my first rom that i try.
Its extremly fast but lack of a loot of futures.
So far i try ACIP - little laggy
AOSP Extended - buggy for me (keyboard, viber bug).
Legend - normal performance good battery life.
Halogen - really fast and stable rom no futures.
And now o dont know what to doo.
Im really like the lineage color temp profile.
I like the Android Paranoid but no colof profile.
Dont know what to do.

Sectorian said:
Ок.
I find that the AOSP rom are mo buggy for me.
I like the future for lineage to change color profile.
I miss this in all other rom.
Halogen rom was my first rom that i try.
Its extremly fast but lack of a loot of futures.
So far i try ACIP - little laggy
AOSP Extended - buggy for me (keyboard, viber bug).
Legend - normal performance good battery life.
Halogen - really fast and stable rom no futures.
And now o dont know what to doo.
Im really like the lineage color temp profile.
I like the Android Paranoid but no colof profile.
Dont know what to do.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
volte present in halogen os?

Sjain11 said:
volte present in halogen os?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes

Related

[DISCUSSION] AOSP or LG stock - which do you prefer on G2?

This thread is the place to discuss what kind of ROM you prefer on the G2 and why. This is NOT a "whats best thread" but more of a: why I like AOSP ROMs more than stock LG based ROMs thread.
I will start: I prefer LG stock roms on my G2 because of extra features and d2ts+more responsive dt2w.
What do you prefer and why?
metteduch said:
This thread is the place to discuss what kind of ROM you prefer on the G2 and why. This is NOT a "whats best thread" but more of a: why I like AOSP ROMs more than stock LG based ROMs thread.
I will start: I prefer LG stock roms on my G2 because of extra features and d2ts+more responsive dt2w.
What do you prefer and why?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AOSP:
- Android 5.1.1
- CAF
- Consistently themed apps
- That much more configuration
- Lighter
- Has ported stock camera
- Better battery
- Less heat
- DT2W is hit or miss
- Some variants have SIM/connectivity issues
-41k in antutu
Stock:
- Has LG features
- Better camera features, not quality in particular
- 34k in antutu
- Worse battery since lollipop
- Heats up quicker, kernel is pretty messy
That's my experience personally!
Choristav said:
AOSP:
- Android 5.1.1
- CAF
- Consistently themed apps
- That much more configuration
- Lighter
- Has ported stock camera
- Better battery
- Less heat
- DT2W is hit or miss
- Some variants have SIM/connectivity issues
-41k in antutu
Stock:
- Has LG features
- Better camera features, not quality in particular
- 34k in antutu
- Worse battery since lollipop
- Heats up quicker, kernel is pretty messy
That's my experience personally!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I saw you responded to my post about CM12 nightlies not continuing for the G2. Wanted to ask you (since you didn't mention) what 5.1 (CAF source) ROM you're running? What would you suggest for a stable AOSP ROM that has device/kernel specific updates for our G2s?
I personally prefer CM 12.1 ROM based on my device: for now I'm running Resurrection Remix with Llama Kernel and it such a beast: Xposed, Android 5.1.1, all that good stuff that make my G2 breaths again. Only issue I think is the camera and a real "Do not distrub" on the ROM. But, yeah, AOSP / CM ROMs for me.
Tried Euphoria OS (5.1.1 CAF etc).
I felt that the CM12 5.0.2 builds were more stable. I don't remember seeing any noticeable improvement or advantage in moving on to CAF 5.1.1 builds (apart from knowing it's running the latest kernel/modem/etc). Lots of promising stuff in CAF builds but I was looking for something more stable, it's not merged to official CM12.1 yet for a reason (I was getting odd vibration bug where on some vibrates, the vibration won't stop until you do another vibration action), camera seemed even slower than on CM12, etc.
Decided to move back to an LG based ROM for the first time ever, I'm running CloudyG2 3.2 now with Nova Launcher, Settings on List View, etc. Very happy with the Xcam LG Camera running. Interface wise I think I prefer the feel of AOSP, and will probably change back if the CAF stuff ever gets merged for an official CM12.1 nightly but I'm going to give CloudyG2 a go for a while and enjoy taking some good snappy photos.
In aosp iam using the last 5.1.1 like nexus so I'm happy and very very faster than stuck rom. Lg 5.02 is very lagy
Stock because AOSP is really unstable.. AOSP is fine for common user but if you are hardcore user or you working on your phone - AOSP ROMs on G2 are mess..
Stable stock LP for me.
41k to 42k in Antutu. Not 34k. I have 2 G2 D800(s) both performed the same. One is with T-Mobile stock with selectable network band and the other with AT&T stock.
I prefer stock because camera in a
Aosp is suck
Sent from my LG-D802 using Tapatalk
CloudyG2 3.3 (almost stock) - good performance, smooth, better camera.
AOSP or Slim based Roms. Stock is ok for the normal user just doesnt have enough for the power user. CM based is not an option.
LG ROMs, tried 99% of AOSP roms for G2 and most are unstable/buggy....KK AOSP has a bad camera/interace dropping frames (same problem on my old nexus 4, status bar pull down laggy), LP AOSP worse camera, AudioFX not working, bugs, worse battery....
Mashed_Potatoes said:
LG ROMs, tried 99% of AOSP roms for G2 and most are unstable/buggy....KK AOSP has a bad camera/interace dropping frames (same problem on my old nexus 4, status bar pull down laggy), LP AOSP worse camera, AudioFX not working, bugs, worse battery....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow sounds like you used CM based roms alot. I have no issue with the camera. Even use the stock camera app on an AOSP based rom (not CM based).
Stock, because AOSP are mostly unstable, if on AOSP you could use the stock camera (with advanced drivers) and have 4G, I would use AOSP, but cause you couldn't, not...
zelendel said:
Wow sounds like you used CM based roms alot. I have no issue with the camera. Even use the stock camera app on an AOSP based rom (not CM based).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tried CAF roms like BlissPop and Euphoria, no diference
Mashed_Potatoes said:
Tried CAF roms like BlissPop and Euphoria, no diference
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Those are still based off of cm. There are only 2 that don't use cm that I know of. Dirty Unicorns and Slim. Anything that is based off of cm is known for issues. They never test any of the code they merge. I won't even mention bliss as that is one of the worst around.
Slim is a fantastic ROM,smooth and fast...it is my daily rom
Inviato dal mio LG-D802 utilizzando Tapatalk
zelendel said:
Those are still based off of cm. There are only 2 that don't use cm that I know of. Dirty Unicorns and Slim. Anything that is based off of cm is known for issues. They never test any of the code they merge. I won't even mention bliss as that is one of the worst around.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've had Slim on my old Nexus 4 but the Slim bloatware always put me off. Now CM doing the same with its Camera app, Calender, Music............
I never tried Dirty Unicorns. What about Resurrectionremix? Is that CM too?
Mashed_Potatoes said:
I've had Slim on my old Nexus 4 but the Slim bloatware always put me off. Now CM doing the same with its Camera app, Calender, Music............
I never tried Dirty Unicorns. What about Resurrectionremix? Is that CM too?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do not know about normal SlimLP,but I do know that SlimSaber is currently the fastest and lightest ROM available.
There is no bloatware,and it is always up to date with the latest Android version(5.1.1 and its subversion).
Sent from my LG-D802 using XDA Forums Pro.
Mashed_Potatoes said:
I've had Slim on my old Nexus 4 but the Slim bloatware always put me off. Now CM doing the same with its Camera app, Calender, Music............
I never tried Dirty Unicorns. What about Resurrectionremix? Is that CM too?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. 99% of roms are based off of cm. Which means they keep most of the bugs that cm has never bothered to fix.

Smoothest CM14 Based ROM?

I just had to move to my RN3Pro as a daily and I am wondering what is the best daily driver Android N ROM for RN3?
K-NineHD said:
I just had to move to my RN3Pro as a daily and I am wondering what is the best daily driver Android N ROM for RN3?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Aicp and CrDroid...
And if u want lte then Santosh build is best and only option
Nikhil Stark said:
Aicp and CrDroid...
And if u want lte then Santosh build is best and only option
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which one you preferred? There's a lot of 7.0 rom and so confusing, I couldn't test all of them one by one. Maybe you could suggest. Aicp, crdroid, strix cm14, or another else.
Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
Faster one is CrDroid and Smoother one AICP
Santosh's cm14 + any kernel with Dynamic fsync is the fastest imo (best latency )
Tesla is smooth but not as smooth as cm14 but stable & quite customizable ( substratum theme engine)
CitrusAOSP is the best on RAM usage (no bloat pure aosp) + faster than Tesla but a bit slower than santosh's cm14
Haven't tested the others
I base my testings on real life benchmarks: Discomark for app openings , androbench for latency & SQLite opérations , vellamo for speed benching.
aaz03 said:
Santosh's cm14 + any kernel with Dynamic fsync is the fastest imo (best latency )
Tesla is smooth but not as smooth as cm14 but stable & quite customizable ( substratum theme engine)
CitrusAOSP is the best on RAM usage (no bloat pure aosp) + faster than Tesla but a bit slower than santosh's cm14
Haven't tested the others
I base my testings on real life benchmarks: Discomark for app openings , androbench for latency & SQLite opérations , vellamo for speed benching.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you mean CypherOS?
Do you guys have goodix FP ? I'm trying to get it working with CM 14 but still no luck. CM 13 wolf patch give me bootloop. That is the only reason why I stick with cm 13
Hazihell said:
Do you guys have goodix FP ? I'm trying to get it working with CM 14 but still no luck. CM 13 wolf patch give me bootloop. That is the only reason why I stick with cm 13
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sorry but I don't own the device yet, just watching users opinions. Mine is coming someday from Monday to weednesday in the next week.
Jaizu said:
I'm sorry but I don't own the device yet, just watching users opinions. Mine is coming someday from Monday to weednesday in the next week.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No problem, friend. It will probably be the newest hardware variant. So you will need some patches to get fingerprint and cameras working with CM. I made it work with RR and it's flawless, except for VR quality that sucks. I'm moving to CM 14 that fixed that VR stuff but I couldn't make goodix fingerprint work on that still, cameras are fine on that btw.
If you need something, feel free to ask.
PS: You will love it. It's the best device for it's price and I love its design, my black one is so cool. lol
Cm14 of santhosh . Latest update fixes many bugs and it's quite smooth.
Also it is the option if you wanna use Volte :good:
shivamss said:
Cm14 of santhosh . Latest update fixes many bugs and it's quite smooth.
Also it is the option if you wanna use Volte :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've heard that Santosh's zips lock the bootloader, is that true?
Hazihell said:
I've heard that Santosh's zips lock the bootloader, is that true?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think so. Coz i flashed twrp through adb commands after flashing it too. Didn't had any problems.
*BUT I'M NOT CONFIRM*
Using the new Helios Rom... verry good to use and look nice.
I managed to get goodix working with Tesla, running smooth right now. Let's see how it goes on the next days.
shivamss said:
Cm14 of santhosh . Latest update fixes many bugs and it's quite smooth.
Also it is the option if you wanna use Volte :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM14, any bugs? I hear that for VoLTE many have not issues.. works only when you dirty flash?
aaz03 said:
Santosh's cm14 + any kernel with Dynamic fsync is the fastest imo (best latency )
Tesla is smooth but not as smooth as cm14 but stable & quite customizable ( substratum theme engine)
CitrusAOSP is the best on RAM usage (no bloat pure aosp) + faster than Tesla but a bit slower than santosh's cm14
Haven't tested the others
I base my testings on real life benchmarks: Discomark for app openings , androbench for latency & SQLite opérations , vellamo for speed benching.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
any of these have VoLTE working?
I personally like AICP because of nightlies and that you can be sure that you are going to get updates... some other rom may never get an update....
although some roms like Beanstalk are now less buggy than AICP....
I tried beanstalk for a couple of days and It lags like hell. I went back to Tesla, it's the smoothest for me and also works with my goodix FP.
Hazihell said:
I tried beanstalk for a couple of days and It lags like hell. I went back to Tesla, it's the smoothest for me and also works with my goodix FP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What doesn't work in TESLA? Can you share known bugs? This will help in making decision.
mGforCe said:
What doesn't work in TESLA? Can you share known bugs? This will help in making decision.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Everything works for me, except for flashlight, its out of sinc and only works when it wants lol.
Hazihell said:
Everything works for me, except for flashlight, its out of sinc and only works when it wants lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does it have VoLTE working?
Sent from RN3 Pro

RR ROM vs Aosp extended

Hi can anyone point me a difference between those two roms? I guess both are using official kernel from xiaomi now? Is one based on aosp and another one on lineage OS? Or they are the same but loaded with different features? Which might be better for girl daily use and good similar to stock ROM battery experience?
Thanks!
terragady said:
Hi can anyone point me a difference between those two roms? I guess both are using official kernel from xiaomi now? Is one based on aosp and another one on lineage OS? Or they are the same but loaded with different features? Which might be better for girl daily use and good similar to stock ROM battery experience?
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are differences in terms of features.
Yep, both Roms based off kernel sources released by Xiaomi.
Yep, AOSP extended is AOSP base & RR is LineageOS base.
You'll notice, both were almost same & RR has few more features than AEX.
Battery is as same as Miui, 8hrs SOT guaranteed, doesn't matter whatever rom you're on.
Both Roms are official ones, choose which one to go.
So probably aosp extended would be better.
Now we have around 11h sot that is even better than my oneplus 3t. Just amazing.
terragady said:
So probably aosp extended would be better.
Now we have around 11h sot that is even better than my oneplus 3t. Just amazing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sachin n said:
There are differences in terms of features.
Yep, both Roms based off kernel sources released by Xiaomi.
Yep, AOSP extended is AOSP base & RR is LineageOS base.
You'll notice, both were almost same & RR has few more features than AEX.
Battery is as same as Miui, 8hrs SOT guaranteed, doesn't matter whatever rom you're on.
Both Roms are official ones, choose which one to go.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bro please can you please kindly expanciate more on the few more features RR has more that AEX please?

CAF or AOSP for pixel experience

i need to know which version of the pixel experience rom is better overall. the CAF or normal AOSP built
iHookar said:
i need to know which version of the pixel experience rom is better overall. the CAF or normal AOSP built
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It depends on users...
Well i care about battery life more than anything

Pls suggest a less customizable ROM

Suggest a stable also less customize opt. ROM
NVM.
amn1987 said:
NVM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
link pls
markmywordz said:
link pls
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh. I meant nevermind as I had wrongly posted in this thread.
Anyway crDroid offers a ton of customization and yet is very stable. Currently on Q builds (6.4). I have used crDroid for the past 7 months without any notable issue. No random reboots,system hanging or app freezing/crashes. Performance is very good and battery backup is excellent.
amn1987 said:
Oh. I meant nevermind as I had wrongly posted in this thread.
Anyway crDroid offers a ton of customization and yet is very stable. Currently on Q builds (6.4). I have used crDroid for the past 7 months without any notable issue. No random reboots,system hanging or app freezing/crashes. Performance is very good and battery backup is excellent.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
U r giving me opposite suggestion.
I just want a minimal ROM.
markmywordz said:
Suggest a stable also less customize opt. ROM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At present pretty much any rom based on Android 10 is stable.
Reloaded OS - performance and battery backup is great as it is a CAF rom. It has minimal but useful customization.
Pixel Experience - There are two variants. One is normal (just stock pixel phone) and the other is plus edition which offers some useful customization. Built-in kernel is okay-ish so better flash another kernel.
Pixel Rom - Authentic Pixel Port. Change kernel for better performance.
Arrow OS
Roms with customization overhaul - Evolution X, Crdroid, Aosip Derpfest, Corvus, Havoc OS and many others.
always prefer try every rom but here's some suggesstion for you
pixel experience because it is very stable and no bloatware also lineage os but for now the android 10 version is not that stable so choose your drug.
Ancient os
markmywordz said:
Suggest a stable also less customize opt. ROM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fewer customisations don't necessarily mean better experience on other aspects.
This being said, PIXEL EXPERIENCE has the fewest customisations of all. It's stable too.

Categories

Resources