Related
So, we've all seen Big Red's LTE capabilities and it's extremely impressive. Anybody care to speculate on what Sprint's LTE will be like, considering the much higher frequency it will initially be running on? Think about penetration (no homo), range, speed, and the never-ending rumor of potential bandwidth caps/throttling.
Speed, no clue. Penetration obviously won't be anywhere near as good until they get it on the iden frequency. 1900 seems only a pinch less sucky than Clear's current frequency to me.
If I understand right the iden frequency is 800mhz? I thought sprint was only going to use this for voice calls?
brownhornet said:
Speed, no clue. Penetration obviously won't be anywhere near as good until they get it on the iden frequency. 1900 seems only a pinch less sucky than Clear's current frequency to me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The penetration will be the same as 3g as the 1900 is what it uses in most places not as good as 800 but alot better than 2500
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Sprint had commitments for iden till 2012, this year, they can shut off the nextel iden network and roll out LTE on the 800mhz frequency this year and likely will do so with that new hybrid box they have been working on. This won't go in all at once, they will roll it out in stages by city and will likely take two years to get it mostly out and another 5+ to hit 95% of market coverage converted.
Nanan00 said:
Sprint had commitments for iden till 2012, this year, they can shut off the nextel iden network and roll out LTE on the 800mhz frequency this year and likely will do so with that new hybrid box they have been working on. This won't go in all at once, they will roll it out in stages by city and will likely take two years to get it mostly out and another 5+ to hit 95% of market coverage converted.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought that sprint is going to use the 800 mhz band for voice only?
http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/32-network-vision-explained/
I believe 1.9 will be used for LTE, CDMA Voice / Data
800 will be used for CDMA Voice / Data and in the future possibly LTE.
IAmSixNine said:
http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/32-network-vision-explained/
I believe 1.9 will be used for LTE, CDMA Voice / Data
800 will be used for CDMA Voice / Data and in the future possibly LTE.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice!
Beat me to posting that site...S4GRU.com is by far the most indepth and best resource for all things Sprint network related right now.
DarkManX4lf said:
I thought that sprint is going to use the 800 mhz band for voice only?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From what I was told, Sprint is building boxes that can push LTE and CDMA on 800 and 1900. How Sprint actually allocates the bandwidth I have no clue but it looks like they are leaving it open for any combination of the two, my guess would be that it depends on load.
Nanan00 said:
From what I was told, Sprint is building boxes that can push LTE and CDMA on 800 and 1900. How Sprint actually allocates the bandwidth I have no clue but it looks like they are leaving it open for any combination of the two, my guess would be that it depends on load.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From what I was told its going to be dependent on the tower location what freq will be used ... In Areas where towers are closer like major metro areas they will use 1900 in more rural areas the will use 800 because the signal will travel further and you can cover more with less towers...but the hardware is going to have all the same in every tower....as redundant backup also....
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Epix4G said:
The penetration will be the same as 3g as the 1900 is what it uses in most places not as good as 800 but alot better than 2500
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Signal wise it should be roughly the same but from what some of the LTE testing has shown is that the performance degrades much more with LTE than it does with EVDO over the signal.
http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/5...coming-800-band/page__view__findpost__p__7857
Epix4G said:
From what I was told its going to be dependent on the tower location what freq will be used ... In Areas where towers are closer like major metro areas they will use 1900 in more rural areas the will use 800 because the signal will travel further and you can cover more with less towers...but the hardware is going to have all the same in every tower....as redundant backup also....
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually, when it comes to metro areas, places like a big city with a large down town district, 800mzh overlay with the 1.9 is the ultimate solution.
800 will penetrate deeper into the buildings and overall give a better in building coverage. So densly populated areas would be a great candidate for both 800mhz and 1.9mhz.
Also there is only so much spectrum that each carrier owns in a given location. So if loading is an issue, they can offload some of the usage to the 800mhz spectrum if or when necessary.
Whatever happened with the rumored upgrade to EVDO Rev B?
mike.r.olson said:
Whatever happened with the rumored upgrade to EVDO Rev B?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
was never anything but a rumor at the least. mainly b/c of the fact that the phones supported it.
Sprint will be doing do-advanced though more likely as they have at least talked about that.
---------- Post added at 07:24 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:22 PM ----------
IAmSixNine said:
Actually, when it comes to metro areas, places like a big city with a large down town district, 800mzh overlay with the 1.9 is the ultimate solution.
800 will penetrate deeper into the buildings and overall give a better in building coverage. So densly populated areas would be a great candidate for both 800mhz and 1.9mhz.
Also there is only so much spectrum that each carrier owns in a given location. So if loading is an issue, they can offload some of the usage to the 800mhz spectrum if or when necessary.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sprint has very little Spectrum in 800MHz compared to the others.....If I were to guess any off loading will be to Clears 2.5GHz which is supposed to have over 5k sites up by next June if i remember correctly...
MOST off loading will be from 3G to 4G more than anything though....hence the smith mirco deal they signed...
It seems from all the spec sheets the 3G SGS3 does NOT have support for DC-HSDPA. Would it then be reasonable to expect the radio performance of the SGS3 to be not significantly different from the SGS2?
Also if someone has had the opportunity to experience both DC-HSDPA and LTE, could they comment on which technology provided a more consistent experience? I ask because the reception and speeds of my SGS2 on my current network (Vodafone AU) has been far from stellar and thus leads me to consider getting a companion phone just for passable data performance on a different network should the SGS3's cellular radio performance be the same as my SGS2 now.
Out of curiosity, why would Samsung leave out DC-HSDPA from the spec sheet in the first place given the SGS3's heavy emphasis on connectivity (NFC, better WiFi, better BT etc)?
I saw a blog via Blinkfeed today saying the Galaxy S4 would support Verizon's new AWS data band.
Will our DNA be able to use it?
Sent from my HTC DNA
That's a big no
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 2
is the LTE radio in the DNA restricted to just the 750 MHz frequency? Because the DNA antenna can hear 1900mhz and 2100 MHz, which is the AWS frequencies.
verizon stated the S4 is the first device to support the new spectrum so no previous phone will get it and even the S4 will need a software update first
I hope the frequency change will improve the signal's ability to penetrate into buildings where I work. My service is magnificent, except for at work. There, it is positively dreadful.
Sadly, looks like it's a moot point anyway, til I upgrade to my next device.
Sent from my HTC DNA
Right now Verizon runs on 750 mhz which which is very good at penetrating buildings. The new freq they are moving to is 1.9 ghz and 2.1 ghz which will not penetrate objects as well or travel as far through open space. The higher the frequency the bigger impact objects, trees, and distance have on your connection. But higher frequency also allows for more throughput so look for better LTE speeds
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Aww shux
HTC DNA
---------- Post added at 02:40 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:39 PM ----------
Should have bought the gs4 aye?
HTC DNA
I'm wondering what Big Red and HTC will have in store for us in about 6 months.
Til then (thanks to this development community), I am quite happy with this phone.
I hope that Newt, Z, Nit, Vin, Micro, Joel, and all the other great devs here stick around for a while.
Sent from my HTC DNA
Personally I think Verizon is crazy to be giving up 750 MHz spectrum to go with 1.9 ghz and 2.1 ghz spectrum. I think they're doing it because you can place more towers in closer proximity using higher frequencies than you can using 750 MHz. The signal traveling further in 750 MHz also causes you to interfere with yourself, so by going to higher frequencies they can place more towers, which enables them to distribute the bandwidth across multiple towers.
So look for higher speed capabilities, and also more consistent speeds. It should improve the reliability if they are in fact going to put up more towers. Just don't expect to get much better performance than ATT or TMobile inside, since these are similar frequencies to what they run on.
jodell22 said:
Personally I think Verizon is crazy to be giving up 750 MHz spectrum to go with 1.9 ghz and 2.1 ghz spectrum. I think they're doing it because you can place more towers in closer proximity using higher frequencies than you can using 750 MHz. The signal traveling further in 750 MHz also causes you to interfere with yourself, so by going to higher frequencies they can place more towers, which enables them to distribute the bandwidth across multiple towers.
So look for higher speed capabilities, and also more consistent speeds. It should improve the reliability if they are in fact going to put up more towers. Just don't expect to get much better performance than ATT or TMobile inside, since these are similar frequencies to what they run on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They're not "giving up" anything. The AWS bands will be an overlay in congested areas.
They're giving up frequencies in the 700 MHz band that they acquired in 2008 in an auction. I'm not saying they are doing away with 700 MHz altogether, but they are giving up channels in the 700 MHz band. Hopefully the hand off between their "AWS" and LTE network (aws just being the license name of the frequencies) will be more seamless than the hand off from 3g to LTE. Otherwise we will have 3g, LTE, and "AWS" that our phones will search for and need to jump between. Every time you enter a building you'll drop AWS, try to get LTE, may or may not get LTE, then drop to 3g...
Anyone that used Sprint WiMAX can tell you how bad higher frequencies penetrate buildings.
fr4nk1yn said:
Anyone that used Sprint WiMAX can tell you how bad higher frequencies penetrate buildings.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They sucked.... Hard
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
BBEgo said:
I hope the frequency change will improve the signal's ability to penetrate into buildings where I work. My service is magnificent, except for at work. There, it is positively dreadful.
Sadly, looks like it's a moot point anyway, til I upgrade to my next device.
Sent from my HTC DNA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Xenoproctologist said:
They're not "giving up" anything. The AWS bands will be an overlay in congested areas.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GOD I hope they don't drop the 700 series down the road. I went with them strictly for the building penetration (I work in a hospital). T-mobile would give me zero signal indoors.
I can't see them giving it up completely until at least 2 years after they stop making phones those radios.
jodell22 said:
They're giving up frequencies in the 700 MHz band that they acquired in 2008 in an auction. I'm not saying they are doing away with 700 MHz altogether, but they are giving up channels in the 700 MHz band. Hopefully the hand off between their "AWS" and LTE network (aws just being the license name of the frequencies) will be more seamless than the hand off from 3g to LTE. Otherwise we will have 3g, LTE, and "AWS" that our phones will search for and need to jump between. Every time you enter a building you'll drop AWS, try to get LTE, may or may not get LTE, then drop to 3g...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They're giving up lower A and B block licenses that they never did anything with anyway, due to the antenna design issues. Their existing 700mhz footprint will be entirely unaffected.
I have to assume that cross-band LTE handoff is much more robust than failover to 3g. It has to be, if they're expecting to use this network as the basis of VoLTE.
Its all in how its handed off. If you think about it as going between 2.4 ghz and 5.8 ghz on a router using the same technology just different frequency the handoff isn't smooth at all. Time will tell.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 4 Beta
So jodell..your saying that the DNA does have the proper radio?what can of speed can we expect?
I'm glad I have hung to my unlimited
I'm not saying we have the right radio, I'm just saying we have the right antenna. Our antenna is tuned for the right frequency, but whether or not our radio can demodulate LTE at those frequencies is a whole different story. I don't know enough about cellular wireless technology to tell you for sure.
Also, I believe other carriers are already running close to 2ghz LTE networks, so I would expect to see speeds similar to theirs. I think ATT, TMobile, and Sprint are all licensed for LTE at around 1.7 ghz - 2.1 ghz
Personally I wouldn't buy the first phone capable of running between the two different bands until it's proven itself. And I hope our phone isn't capable of running in the new bands.
Anyone know if our phone is capable of doing this? Verizon just rolled it out in Seattle (where I'm at) and my friend on his Note 3 had to go into his "Service Mode" and enable it manually but is getting 78megs down and 26 megs up (first test in a congested area). Here's a link to the article he had to read in order to enable it: http://forums.androidcentral.com/ve...enable-band-4-aws-sm-n900v-requires-root.html
After doing some searching it looks like we're SOL. Can anyone confirm? It's been a while since the last post in this thread so I am assuming things may have changed since this last post.
Bsanborn said:
Anyone know if our phone is capable of doing this? Verizon just rolled it out in Seattle (where I'm at) and my friend on his Note 3 had to go into his "Service Mode" and enable it manually but is getting 78megs down and 26 megs up (first test in a congested area). Here's a link to the article he had to read in order to enable it: http://forums.androidcentral.com/ve...enable-band-4-aws-sm-n900v-requires-root.html
After doing some searching it looks like we're SOL. Can anyone confirm? It's been a while since the last post in this thread so I am assuming things may have changed since this last post.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://androidcommunity.com/verizon...206/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=pulsenews
People we don't need the the new Korea s4 with snapdragon 800 to use lte advanced since the s4 for Verizon is the only s4 in america right now that is already capable of lte advanced all it needs is an update or firmware update to enable it just thought you should all know this for people who don't know this yet.. every other s4 is not future proof like Verizons.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using xda app-developers app
I thought that the Verizon version had AWS, which is different than LTE-Advanced...
Right?
Please correct me if I am wrong.
Aws= advanced wireless spectrum which technically is the same as lteA = long term evolution advanced
Sent from my SCH-I545 using xda app-developers app
Correct me if I am wrong but I think LTE-Advanced encompasses AWS as AWS(Advanced Wireless Services) is a spectrum.
If this is true, yes!
A key to the new high speed lte is the smaller fabrication process to emit less heat. Not seeing how this future proof is correct, since the S4 gets hot with current lte. A firmware update will not change the fabrication process. Seems a physics defying premise.
The Snap 800 uses a lower fabrication process for both cpu/gpu and the radios. The hardware jump from the S4 Snap 600 to S4 Snap 800 jump in chipset is bigger than the S3 Snap dual and the S4 Snap 600.
Samsung is being too understated with the new S4 naming. Probably as not to hurt current S4 sales.
gabrielpina4 said:
Aws= advanced wireless spectrum which technically is the same as lteA = long term evolution advanced
Sent from my SCH-I545 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AWS is the name of the spectrum band VZW will be supplementing it's current LTE network with. It has nothing do with LTE-A networks. That's not to say that AWS spectrum cannot be used for an LTE Advanced network.
Last time I checked Verizon had not indicated whether they will deploying LTE-A anytime soon.
Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong about VZW intention to deploy LTE-A.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using xda premium
Honesty, who needs speeds faster than 20mbs? It's not practical for most people
Sent from my SCH-I545 using xda premium
gabrielpina4 said:
People we don't need the the new Korea s4 with snapdragon 800 to use lte advanced since the s4 for Verizon is the only s4 in america right now that is already capable of lte advanced all it needs is an update or firmware update to enable it just thought you should all know this for people who don't know this yet.. every other s4 is not future proof like Verizons.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree.
We won't be getting those speeds for quite some time on Verizon but the new device will be coming to the US. Just not to Verizon
The LTE-A version is not compatible with Verizons AWS. Not the same technology as was pointed out earlier. A naming scheme does not bring technology with it.
What some people don't understand is that the Korean LTE-A S4 will work in the US. You just won't get the LTE-A. You will get 3g or 1x.
Guys don't feed the troll.
gabrielpina4 said:
Aws= advanced wireless spectrum which technically is the same as lteA = long term evolution advanced
Sent from my SCH-I545 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, it's not. AWS allows for a dual-link, which in theory doubles speeds. LTE-A can hit speeds of up to 1gbps. AWS LTE is NOT LTE-A.
tsangwc said:
Guys don't feed the troll.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Troll = Naysayer to the premise of the OP?
Too much higher speed LTE will run too hot on the current S4 radio, since too high of a fabrication process to efficiently (thermally + power draw) manage the signal. Sorry if I am misunderstanding your post
Added:
Isn't "future proof" with consumer electronics an oxymoron?
jaykresge said:
No, it's not. AWS allows for a dual-link, which in theory doubles speeds. LTE-A can hit speeds of up to 1gbps. AWS LTE is NOT LTE-A.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dead on right. +1
rushless said:
Troll = Naysayer to the premise of the OP?
Too much higher speed LTE will run too hot on the current S4 radio, since too high of a fabrication process to efficiently (thermally + power draw) manage the signal. Sorry if I am misunderstanding your post
Added:
Isn't "future proof" with consumer electronics an oxymoron?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Higher speeds make the S4 hotter?? The is no reason it would run hotter at higher speeds at all. It doesn't work that way. Never mind what that guy said about fab process.
Sent from my SGS4. Go Blue!! Buck the Fuc keyes!!
Yea this S4 is such a piece...so slow...gonna have to buy the faster one, this one isn't cutting it
I am a tad confused, since Samsung mentioned that the Snap 800 was a new production process to improve battery and reduce heat and faster LTE, but the Snap 800 uses the same 28nm process. The two differences are the radios and gpu. GPU is a lot faster, but same 28nm. Seems it will run hotter than the Snap 600 unless the radios were improved to a lower fabrication process.
Not adding up. Considering the Snap 600 already plays games butter smooth, we may be hitting a diminished return curve from that regard. The biggie would be radio improvements to reduce heat resistance there.
I think I bit the Samsung marketing BS, since the 800 seems a better chip for tablets that can dissipate the heat better with a bigger footprint.
No real point in waiting for an S4 with the 800 in it. I think the 600 will be a safer chip in regards to heat concerns compare to the 800. 28nm is 28nm, no matter how they spin it. I was duped hard. Added: Not that it is hard to do.
rushless said:
I am a tad confused, since Samsung mentioned that the Snap 800 was a new production process to improve battery and reduce heat and faster LTE, but the Snap 800 uses the same 28nm process.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're confusing "new process" with "smaller process." Not every fabrication process change requires going to a smaller process. Snapdragon S600 uses the 28nm LP process, whereas the S800 uses the 28nm HPm process. This allows the CPU to be more battery efficient, which allows it to produce less heat, and therefore, reach higher clock speeds. The 600 peaks at 1.9ghz whereas the 800 peaks at 2.3ghz (yes, good batches can be overclocked further). The process has no effect on the radio. That's a separate component within the SOC.
As for the radio, Snapdragon devices have long been lauded for having a built-in radio on the SOC. The S4 Pro (used in Nexus 4, Droid DNA, Xperia Z, etc.) has a built-in radio compatible with GSM, UMTS, CDMA, and LTE (so long as it's paired with the right antenna, amplifier, and firmware). The Snapdragon 600 does NOT have built in radios. The radio is separate. So, Snapdragon 600/SOCs are typically paired with a radio (usually also made by Qualcomm) that suits the needs of the network(s) targeted by that device. The Snapdragon 800 comes in versions with and without the radio/modem. The one that comes with it supports GSM/UMTS/CDMA/LTE w/carrier aggregation up to 150mbps (IE, AWS spectrum, though it's not the only example). The Snapdragon 800 does not have on-die LTE-Advanced support. That still requires a separate chip. A future teardown of the S4 LTE-A model will show this.
Hi I'm just wondering there's a mode called High speed LTE mode in my setting i'm just wondering is it the same eith VoLTE or not(?) if so can anyone explain to me the difference?
To save a redirect...
We set out to clarify technical jargons in simple terms so that average smartphone users can make sense of it all, and be well-informed when buying a smart phone and/or a signal booster kit for it. 4G and LTE are closely-related technologies. However, despite what some people think, and despite the impression some networks try to give – they are not one and the same thing. But then what are the differences, and how much do they matter? The first step in answering these questions is to determine what exactly the two terms mean.
What is 4G?
4G is the 4th Generation of mobile internet connectivity, and refers to mobile internet networks that are able to offer certain speeds. These speed criteria were first defined in 2008, long before they were realistic, as something for mobile networks to aspire to, in developing the next generation of internet connectivity.
On-the-go, a network has to offer peak speeds of no less than 100 Mbps to qualify as 4G. In more stable applications, such as stationary hotspots, peak speeds must reach at least 1Gbps. While these speeds may have been nothing more than future targets when they were first set, new technologies have allowed 4G-compliant networks to be rolled out, and some older 3G networks to be improved to offer 4G speeds. However, even so reliably achieving 4G standards proved a bit more difficult than anticipated, and this is where LTE comes in.
What is LTE?
LTE is 4G – in a sense. It stands for Long Term Evolution, and refers not to a single technology but to the processes, developments, and set of technologies used to try to bring about 4G speeds. As it proved more difficult than expected to actually bring about 4G speeds, regulators decided that LTE networks which offered a significant improvement over 3G speeds would be eligible for labelling as 4G even if they did not meet the speeds originally set as 4G standards.
This was a decision companies were quick to take advantage of, and a lot of the time when your phone claims to have 4G reception it is actually connected to an LTE network. This is 4G in a sense thanks to the regulator's decision, but it isn't true 4G in that it does not really meet 4G speed standards. LTE mobile devices are typically capable of CAT4 speeds (Category 4 speeds) and can reach a theoretical speed of 150 Mbps (Mega-Byte Per Second).
What is LTE+ (or LTE Plus) and LTE-A (or LTE Advanced)
LTE+ and LTE-A are exactly the same - The terms are used interchangeably because some carriers in some countries decided to use one or the other for no particular reason. This technology is basically based on the basic LTE platform discussed above, except that the data transfer speeds are triple or even more faster than LTE.
Availability of Plus or Advanced LTE in mobile equipment (smartphones and tablets) is increasing steadily as more manufacturers are manufacturing their flagship or higher end devices that are capable of it (Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge being a prime example). LTE mobile devices are typically capable of CAT6 speeds (Category 6 speeds) and can reach a theoretical speed of 300 Mbps.
The coverage of Advanced or Plus LTE is also gradually increasing as more cellular service providers such as Verizon, T-Mobile, AT&T, Sprint in USA and Bell, Telus, Rogers in Canada are expanding their coverage offering these incredibly high data transfer speeds outside of major cities in USA and Canada, respectively. North American mobile service providers have started this trend of starting with the largest cities first, and then aggressively building their Advanced or Plus LTE networks to support remaining vast areas of their respective coverage areas within their respective countries.
Do the Differences Matter?
In an everyday sense, the differences probably don't matter very much. Most of our signal boosters are also 4G capable (forward to 5G capable and backward to 2G & 3G compatible) whereas all of our commercial boosters are 5G/ 4G LTE compatible. There is not a hugely noticeable gap in speeds between 4G LTE and true 4G networks, and due to time and location variances, these networks will often offer virtually identical speeds. LTE Advanced or LTE Plus on the other hand, offer considerably faster wireless data transfer speeds which may be very helpful if one performs a lot of Internet activities such as frequent downloads, etc. on their mobile devices using their mobile networks. However, it is important to note that in order to take advantage of those higher speeds, the mobile devices have to be capable of those higher speeds and the cellular provider has to have that Advanced or Plus network available in areas of mobile use.
There can be something of a difference when it comes to buying signal boosting equipment. If you are buying a signal booster or repeater with the intention of extending a type of LTE or 4G reception, for example, then you will probably want the one that has "4G" included in its name or description. We sell 4G signal boosters that are compatible with both true 4G, LTE, and LTE Advanced/ Plus networks so you will be covered for all because they are backward compatible, all the way down to 3G and 2G. Now you know the differences between 4G LTE LTE+ and LTE Advanced!
miffymiffy said:
To save a redirect...
We set out to clarify technical jargons in simple terms so that average smartphone users can make sense of it all, and be well-informed when buying a smart phone and/or a signal booster kit for it. 4G and LTE are closely-related technologies. However, despite what some people think, and despite the impression some networks try to give – they are not one and the same thing. But then what are the differences, and how much do they matter? The first step in answering these questions is to determine what exactly the two terms mean.
What is 4G?
4G is the 4th Generation of mobile internet connectivity, and refers to mobile internet networks that are able to offer certain speeds. These speed criteria were first defined in 2008, long before they were realistic, as something for mobile networks to aspire to, in developing the next generation of internet connectivity.
On-the-go, a network has to offer peak speeds of no less than 100 Mbps to qualify as 4G. In more stable applications, such as stationary hotspots, peak speeds must reach at least 1Gbps. While these speeds may have been nothing more than future targets when they were first set, new technologies have allowed 4G-compliant networks to be rolled out, and some older 3G networks to be improved to offer 4G speeds. However, even so reliably achieving 4G standards proved a bit more difficult than anticipated, and this is where LTE comes in.
What is LTE?
LTE is 4G – in a sense. It stands for Long Term Evolution, and refers not to a single technology but to the processes, developments, and set of technologies used to try to bring about 4G speeds. As it proved more difficult than expected to actually bring about 4G speeds, regulators decided that LTE networks which offered a significant improvement over 3G speeds would be eligible for labelling as 4G even if they did not meet the speeds originally set as 4G standards.
This was a decision companies were quick to take advantage of, and a lot of the time when your phone claims to have 4G reception it is actually connected to an LTE network. This is 4G in a sense thanks to the regulator's decision, but it isn't true 4G in that it does not really meet 4G speed standards. LTE mobile devices are typically capable of CAT4 speeds (Category 4 speeds) and can reach a theoretical speed of 150 Mbps (Mega-Byte Per Second).
What is LTE+ (or LTE Plus) and LTE-A (or LTE Advanced)
LTE+ and LTE-A are exactly the same - The terms are used interchangeably because some carriers in some countries decided to use one or the other for no particular reason. This technology is basically based on the basic LTE platform discussed above, except that the data transfer speeds are triple or even more faster than LTE.
Availability of Plus or Advanced LTE in mobile equipment (smartphones and tablets) is increasing steadily as more manufacturers are manufacturing their flagship or higher end devices that are capable of it (Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge being a prime example). LTE mobile devices are typically capable of CAT6 speeds (Category 6 speeds) and can reach a theoretical speed of 300 Mbps.
The coverage of Advanced or Plus LTE is also gradually increasing as more cellular service providers such as Verizon, T-Mobile, AT&T, Sprint in USA and Bell, Telus, Rogers in Canada are expanding their coverage offering these incredibly high data transfer speeds outside of major cities in USA and Canada, respectively. North American mobile service providers have started this trend of starting with the largest cities first, and then aggressively building their Advanced or Plus LTE networks to support remaining vast areas of their respective coverage areas within their respective countries.
Do the Differences Matter?
In an everyday sense, the differences probably don't matter very much. Most of our signal boosters are also 4G capable (forward to 5G capable and backward to 2G & 3G compatible) whereas all of our commercial boosters are 5G/ 4G LTE compatible. There is not a hugely noticeable gap in speeds between 4G LTE and true 4G networks, and due to time and location variances, these networks will often offer virtually identical speeds. LTE Advanced or LTE Plus on the other hand, offer considerably faster wireless data transfer speeds which may be very helpful if one performs a lot of Internet activities such as frequent downloads, etc. on their mobile devices using their mobile networks. However, it is important to note that in order to take advantage of those higher speeds, the mobile devices have to be capable of those higher speeds and the cellular provider has to have that Advanced or Plus network available in areas of mobile use.
There can be something of a difference when it comes to buying signal boosting equipment. If you are buying a signal booster or repeater with the intention of extending a type of LTE or 4G reception, for example, then you will probably want the one that has "4G" included in its name or description. We sell 4G signal boosters that are compatible with both true 4G, LTE, and LTE Advanced/ Plus networks so you will be covered for all because they are backward compatible, all the way down to 3G and 2G. Now you know the differences between 4G LTE LTE+ and LTE Advanced!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow thank you soo much for the information
i canstill achieve speeds of 120mpbs without high speed LTE however