Let's get a thread started to discuss the problems, and hopefully SOLUTIONS for two specific issues reported in many early release Huawei P30 Pro's.
First is a very noticeable RED TINT to the video produced on the P30 Pro and the second is STUTTER & LAG (seen mostly while panning).
Do you have this problem or is your phone fine? Do third party apps solve the issue? Is the issue software or hardware? Do recent updates solve the problem? Could this simply be an issue with pre-release software in some early videos?
Let's discuss & troubleshoot.
We need video samples (good or bad) from real people with the phone!!
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
Hopefully someone can provide a 4K video recorded with Open Camera set at max bitrate, with panning and moving objects.
Stumbled upon another fairly honest clip which does mention these problems, but also clearly notes things look lot less saturated when recording with wide lens
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eP6LtcH8724&feature=youtu.be&t=336
For comparison, here are bitrates from S10:
With the H.264 codec, the [email protected] videos are captured at 72Mbps bitrate, the [email protected] - 48Mbps, the [email protected] - 28Mbps, and the [email protected] - 14Mbps.
WM_Rizzo said:
Hopefully someone can provide a 4K video recorded with Open Camera set at max bitrate, with panning and moving objects.
Stumbled upon another fairly honest clip which does mention these problems, but also clearly notes things look lot less saturated when recording with wide lens
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eP6LtcH8724&feature=youtu.be&t=336
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I saw that as well. The wide angle does not seem to suffer the same oversaturated picture. Does that mean it's hardware? I assumed this is probably software related. If it's software then third party apps could be a solution.
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
I would really like to see some video samples from someone on the .124 update. A lot of the video we are seeing from Paris is pre-release software. If someone can post some video panning and of people, to see if the red skin tones exist it would be great.
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
EricMartinSoCal said:
I would really like to see some video samples from someone on the .124 update. A lot of the video we are seeing from Paris is pre-release software. If someone can post some video panning and of people, to see if the red skin tones exist it would be great.
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmmm, this 4K video does not look that bad. It's from a Croatian review site, which is usually pretty honest in their reviews. Yes, there is some jerkiness and saturation, but it does not look horrible. I'm leaning towards this being more of a software issue.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-t5t4vXnaI
This also looks better (not great, but better) than TechTablets video test. Perhaps it's the new update?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVzAT-SoKuE
WM_Rizzo said:
This also looks better (not great, but better) than TechTablets video test. Perhaps it's the new update?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVzAT-SoKuE
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Too bad he didn't upload 1440p or 4K. He has few other videos there as well, not bad, not great, image stabilization seems a bit shaky sometimes.
---------- Post added at 10:53 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:33 PM ----------
WM_Rizzo said:
Hmmm, this 4K video does not look that bad. It's from a Croatian review site, which is usually pretty honest in their reviews. Yes, there is some jerkiness and saturation, but it does not look horrible. I'm leaning towards this being more of a software issue.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-t5t4vXnaI
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
His other videos are nice, this shows 5x video, I like it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yotUrvKQR4M
Sadly everything is 1080p again with lots of youtube overcompression. Interestingly he also has a lot of S10+ samples of the same locations.
EDIT: he has a few S10+ 4K videos there but none for P30 Pro.
---------- Post added at 11:05 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:53 PM ----------
The image shakes every now and then, kind of wobbles like some kind of distortion, it's probably software issue with image stabilization and also colors seem way off, like everything was red: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FA3fcyG9j6M
The same looks fine on S10: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qV29PdjSsX8
WM_Rizzo said:
This also looks better (not great, but better) than TechTablets video test. Perhaps it's the new update?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVzAT-SoKuE
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am hoping that some people with the .124 update can check on their color accuracy. It's possible that the update included fixes - it would explain why some seem to be unaware of the issue entirely.
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
I am also planning on using FiLMiC Pro since I can manually edit the saturation, red level etc. I understand it's not for everyone because it costs about $30 to get all the options but I'm interested to see of that gives me a 'work around' on some of the video issues. When I get my P30 Pro next week I'll be sure to update. Hopefully there will be a solution from Huawei by then and a professional video app will not be needed to produce great shots!
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
Update: I have had several people report that their video quality is "excellent" and does not exhibit the issues we have been discussing. Perhaps the .124 update was a solution? It would be nice if Huawei (or anyone for that matter) would detail what specific improvements are contained in their updates. You would think they would want to disseminate the information to the public as fast as possible!
Can someone with the .124 update tell us if the issue is resolved?
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
We need to see examples, some people will never see the problem in the first place. You won't believe me but I have friends who can not tell a difference between 720p and 1080p, when it's obvious to you, frustrating...
There's no red tint on 124. None that i notice anyways. When does it occur ? Indoors, at night, all the time ? Panning has some slight stutters at times if you move it too fast. Feels like the stabilization can't keep up with the horizontal swivel.
Here is the same scene, daylight:
With red tint: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yotUrvKQR4M
without: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBEC1Bd1yqk
schriss said:
Here is the same scene, daylight:
With red tint:
without:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same phone? What did you changed?
schriss said:
Here is the same scene, daylight:
With red tint: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yotUrvKQR4M
without: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBEC1Bd1yqk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. I can see it in the steps immediately. Are you showing the difference between phones with the .124 update and prior to the update? Or are you showing us two different phones on the same software? What is different, because that pretty well suggests a fix.
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
The one without if from a S10+ it seems.
gm007 said:
Same phone? What did you changed?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Different phones but same location same time, to make it easier for testers to spot red tint, show what it looks like compared to no-tint video.
I do not know if the tinted video is before or after firmware update.
I think red tint goes away when he zooms in 5x.
schriss said:
Different phones but same location same time, to make it easier for testers to spot red tint, show what it looks like compared to no-tint video.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh damn. I thought you fixed it on the P30 Pro. What other phone was used? S10?
Yes the issue will not be on the other lenses. It's a problem with the main camera. My guess is the RYYB turns out to be a bad match to the way Huawei has the saturation - specifically red levels pre-set. So a 3rd party video camera app may solve if it allows me to adjust. This would be an easy fix for Huawei if they pushed an update that turns down saturation, but it don't know if they can do that for only one camera?
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
schriss said:
Different phones but same location same time, to make it easier for testers to spot red tint, show what it looks like compared to no-tint video.
I do not know if the tinted video is before or after firmware update.
I think red tint goes away when he zooms in 5x.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes red tint will go away if you use the wide or telephoto lens cause they use different sensors,but the problem is with the spectrum sensor that Huawei decided to ditch the green pixels for a yellow one that's why the red tint occur.
Related
Oh god the camera is bad, all I ask for is a decent camera that can snap pictures of words on maybe a whiteboard from a distance when I'm in a meeting and god does the image look horrible when I zoom is, there is no detail at all sort of like an over sharpening of a blur image. God even the nexus 4 has a much clearer image than this although that's plagued by its far I share of focusing bugs
beerope said:
Oh god the camera is bad, all I ask for is a decent camera that can snap pictures of words on maybe a whiteboard from a distance when I'm in a meeting and god does the image look horrible when I zoom is, there is no detail at all sort of like an over sharpening of a blur image. God even the nexus 4 has a much clearer image than this although that's plagued by its far I share of focusing bugs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey mate. Don't despair. Just load a 3rd party camera app. I'm going between Camera Zoom FX and Camera FV-5 at the moment. I think FV-5 is going to be my choice.
There's not much wrong with the optics on the Ultra just too much native compression from Sony's own app.
So with a better app I'm seeing much better results.
beerope said:
Oh god the camera is bad, all I ask for is a decent camera that can snap pictures of words on maybe a whiteboard from a distance when I'm in a meeting and god does the image look horrible when I zoom is, there is no detail at all sort of like an over sharpening of a blur image. God even the nexus 4 has a much clearer image than this although that's plagued by its far I share of focusing bugs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah @pfatty is on the money!
check out my thread here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2481316
You'll need to test others if you think there is something else better out there.
Good luck.
I am using focal and finding that quite decent
hamdogg said:
yeah @pfatty is on the money!
check out my thread here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2481316
You'll need to test others if you think there is something else better out there.
Good luck.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
pfatty said:
Hey mate. Don't despair. Just load a 3rd party camera app. I'm going between Camera Zoom FX and Camera FV-5 at the moment. I think FV-5 is going to be my choice.
There's not much wrong with the optics on the Ultra just too much native compression from Sony's own app.
So with a better app I'm seeing much better results.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Trust me, ive tried. They look more or less the same, ive tried it all. The paid verions for fx, fv5, focal, motox camera, ics camera+ and hdr camera. They all look more or less the same, the details seems to be like a chalk painting when zoomed in. Even in the thread, the leaves edges seems to be like chalk smudge, i just need a fix that will let me take a goddamn picture of my office notes on a projected screen ahh
after root i threw in the gallery app from aosp and it included the camera app too. works fine. lets me to those photospheres too
beerope said:
Trust me, ive tried. They look more or less the same, ive tried it all. The paid verions for fx, fv5, focal, motox camera, ics camera+ and hdr camera. They all look more or less the same, the details seems to be like a chalk painting when zoomed in. Even in the thread, the leaves edges seems to be like chalk smudge, i just need a fix that will let me take a goddamn picture of my office notes on a projected screen ahh
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi Beerope.
I'm with you on this.
I get the feeling that camera apps on google market still use the same sony provided codecs for compression when using a stock rom.
Sony ZU codecs and camera force a file size of under 2mb which is why the definition when zoomed in is so crap...
I have a theory that if you use a rom like CM10.x or AOSP that the picture quality will be greatly improved when using third party camera apps or even the native camera apps as those roms are using the standard android codecs.
This will also be evident in the file sizes generated by those camera apps.
Unfortunately I cant test as I need my phone for work purposes (so it remains on stock) at the moment and haven't got time to experiment with custom roms yet.
I'm currently on 510 and refuse to got to 526 or 532 due to the weird SODs I keep reading about.
My previous ZU had 526 and had so many problems with random screen clicking.
My current ZU is on 510 and I've had no problems at all - rock solid no random clicking but obviously the picture quality from the camera sucks...
---------- Post added at 01:07 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:03 AM ----------
Also we may be able to improve the quality by using methods similar to those described in this thread...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1030603
Obviously we'd need to identify the relevant files first.
qazzi76 said:
Hi Beerope.
I'm with you on this.
I get the feeling that camera apps on google market still use the same sony provided codecs for compression when using a stock rom.
Sony ZU codecs and camera force a file size of under 2mb which is why the definition when zoomed in is so crap...
I have a theory that if you use a rom like CM10.x or AOSP that the picture quality will be greatly improved when using third party camera apps or even the native camera apps as those roms are using the standard android codecs.
This will also be evident in the file sizes generated by those camera apps.
Unfortunately I cant test as I need my phone for work purposes (so it remains on stock) at the moment and haven't got time to experiment with custom roms yet.
I'm currently on 510 and refuse to got to 526 or 532 due to the weird SODs I keep reading about.
My previous ZU had 526 and had so many problems with random screen clicking.
My current ZU is on 510 and I've had no problems at all - rock solid no random clicking but obviously the picture quality from the camera sucks...
---------- Post added at 01:07 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:03 AM ----------
Also we may be able to improve the quality by using methods similar to those described in this thread...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1030603
Obviously we'd need to identify the relevant files first.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM10.2 (flavours) are a little better. The file size is an issue as image artifacts are greatly reduced. It is a problem Sony needs to sort out. 3rd part apps can only improve so much. its up to firmware.
beerope said:
Oh god the camera is bad, all I ask for is a decent camera that can snap pictures of words on maybe a whiteboard from a distance when I'm in a meeting and god does the image look horrible when I zoom is, there is no detail at all sort of like an over sharpening of a blur image. God even the nexus 4 has a much clearer image than this although that's plagued by its far I share of focusing bugs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
Would you load some sample shots? I'd like to buy this device, but it seems like the camera isn't very good.
Thanks!
ntdatter said:
Hi,
Would you load some sample shots? I'd like to buy this device, but it seems like the camera isn't very good.
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2481316
pfatty said:
Hey mate. Don't despair. Just load a 3rd party camera app. I'm going between Camera Zoom FX and Camera FV-5 at the moment. I think FV-5 is going to be my choice.
There's not much wrong with the optics on the Ultra just too much native compression from Sony's own app.
So with a better app I'm seeing much better results.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just purchased Fv-5 but I didn't support video
Sent from my C6802 using Tapatalk 4
Hey guys, I'm returning from a recent trip to iPhoneland and I'm looking for the camera app that's closest to keeping up with the iPhone's camera.
I'm running cm11 and so far the best I've found is this one here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2540030
This one takes a lot better pictures than the stock cm or the google camera from the play store, but it still lags behind the iPhone.
it's not about the camera app, it's about the hardware...
No camera app on LG G2 can match iPhone and/or Nokia just because of the camera hardware (sensor, lens,...) which is not that good on LG
To explore full benefits of LG camera hardware, you'll have to move to one of stock based roms and then try i.e. Xdabbeb camera...
60nine said:
it's not about the camera app, it's about the hardware...
No camera app on LG G2 can match iPhone and/or Nokia just because of the camera hardware (sensor, lens,...) which is not that good on LG
To explore full benefits of LG camera hardware, you'll have to move to one of stock based roms and then try i.e. Xdabbeb camera...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright that's what I was kind of afraid of. I know that there is a limit to how good the camera is going to be but I was hoping I hadn't found it yet. There is a significant variation between the different camera apps I have tried. It's too bad we can't use the camera to its full potential on aosp based roms.
I would strongly disagree with what 60nine just said, but that's just me. The main issue is the stock "camera" app is kinda crappy and does way too much processing on the image data from the sensor. It's not the best image sensor that's ever been made, no, of course not, but it is quite a nice one especially with the OIS as part of the hardware.
Having said that, I personally use Mi2raw nowadays which allows me to capture pure raw image data from the G2 sensor and dumps it as a DNG (Adobe Digital Negative) file which I then transfer over to my laptop for editing/post processing using Photoshop.
If you want some examples of what the G2's camera is capable of, look here:
https://www.flickr.com/groups/[email protected]/pool/
You can find more info about Mi2raw (available on the Google Play Market, it's free) in the main thread for it and yes there's more pics too:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/lg-g2/general/app-mi2raw-enables-capturing-real-raw-t2837089
Again, we're not dealing with the best image sensor ever made but I've been damned happy with the results I've been getting with my G2 because of Mi2raw (I just got this G2 like 3 weeks ago).
As far as other apps, I use Aviary (it was free a few days ago, with every single filter they had for free too so I grabbed it all and backed it up safely), PerfectlyClear which gave away their Android app for free last week (it's not too bad, actually), and Photoshop Express (which can load the DNG files directly on the G2 directly from Mi2raw for quick viewing).
There's also XCam LG which adds a lot of functionality to the G2 including giving it 4K video recording capability (just make sure to read the details in the thread):
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2548974
XCam LG has a settings app to tweak it further located on the Play Market as well, it's worth the price if you need it.
For me personally I just use Mi2raw for most every picture I snap these days then do editing/PP work when I get back home, it's what works best for me at this time.
Hope this helps...
Try Cymera. It's free and has good editing tools. Drawbacks are that it takes a bit to load and is not too stable. It's the only camera app that focuses correctly and has a proper white balance!!!! The resolution is small 1 Megapixel?, but the image is sharper and better than any 13megapixel shot from other camera apps or stock.
Otherwise just take the stock LG camera app as a daily driver.
br0adband said:
I would strongly disagree with what 60nine just said, but that's just me. The main issue is the stock "camera" app is kinda crappy and does way too much processing on the image data from the sensor. It's not the best image sensor that's ever been made, no, of course not, but it is quite a nice one especially with the OIS as part of the hardware.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
why would you disagree if its known that iPhone and Nokia use way better sensor and lenses? (and i'm not an iphone fanboy, far from that )
i didn't say that LG hardware is crap - i'm just saying that it's no match to those two... or to say it better - "close but no cigar"
Nokia & iPhone give much better low light images than LG (partly due to better sensor, partly due to smaller f-stop lens number which lets more light onto the sensor)
for comparison
LG G2 has F/2.4 lens < iphone/nokia use F/2.2 lens (smaller the f-stop, more light comes in)
Having said that, I personally use Mi2raw nowadays which allows me to capture pure raw image data from the G2 sensor and dumps it as a DNG (Adobe Digital Negative) file which I then transfer over to my laptop for editing/post processing using Photoshop.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i didn't mention mi2raw app on purpose because it's not for everyone... and since i'm a photo hobbyist and DSLR owner, it gives me a bit of real camera world in a mobile device...
and what i like about mi2raw (besides its raw capability) is that the photos taken with that app don't look "painted" or "blurred" because of too much noise reduction that other camera apps produce
mi2raw would be too complicated to use for an average user... but hey - it's free, and everyone can try it and see
everything else you wrote - i second...
+ Snapseed is an image app worth mentioning especially with its ambiance setting that gives an image a nice "bump" in every way if it's used correctly...
personally i'm currently "stuck" with mi2raw, xdabbeb's XCam (because of those extra options you mentioned) and google camera (because it's the best for panorama/sphere images)
cheers...
In my opinion the best camera so far has been the one with CloudyG3 ROM
Sent from my LG-D805 using XDA Free mobile app
br0adband said:
Hope this helps...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the Mi2RAW suggestion, I'll check that out. I work with raws from my dslr but I don't know how badly I really need to have all my phone pictures shot as raw. I'll see how it goes
marchina said:
In my opinion the best camera so far has been the one with CloudyG3 ROM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
which is basically a stock cam app that uses xdabbeb's advanced binaries (so it's pretty much the same as XCam, but Xcam gets updated by xdabbeb every now and then)
---------- Post added at 06:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:31 PM ----------
StevenInMichigan said:
Thanks for the Mi2RAW suggestion, I'll check that out. I work with raws from my dslr but I don't know how badly I really need to have all my phone pictures shot as raw. I'll see how it goes
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sometimes you just want that bit of extra image customization that raw offers
since you have dslr as well, you know what i'm on about
60nine said:
which is basically a stock cam app that uses xdabbeb's advanced binaries (so it's pretty much the same as XCam, but Xcam gets updated by xdabbeb every now and then)
---------- Post added at 06:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:31 PM ----------
sometimes you just want that bit of extra image customization that raw offers
since you have dslr as well, you know what i'm on about
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did not know that thanks
Sent from my LG-D805 using XDA Free mobile app
"a Better Camera" app is what I use on non stock Roms and it's very good. LG camera hardware is not that good? You make me laugh... Can IPhone camera record 4k?Does it have ois?
The only thing that iPhone is better at is the image processing. That's it. (period).
I use the G2's stock camera app on AICP. It's okay, but the images look washed out compared to my Optimus G.
Sent From Capsule Corp.
60nine said:
it's not about the camera app, it's about the hardware...
No camera app on LG G2 can match iPhone and/or Nokia just because of the camera hardware (sensor, lens,...) which is not that good on LG
To explore full benefits of LG camera hardware, you'll have to move to one of stock based roms and then try i.e. Xdabbeb camera...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bulsh*t of the month/year? :fingers-crossed: Only way to reveal the potencial of any and I mean ANY camera HW is to shoot RAW only! You can say Lg stock camera is bad and I will agree but not talk about HW whenn you didnt see pure RAW data. Just look at the samples I shot with the best android camera for photo enthusiasts: Mi2raw camera which is capable of capturing pure DNG files without freaky Lg jpeg engine, which is IMHO the worst I ever seen. I took indoor photos on ISO400-800 so dont blame the small sensor of more noise, no such a small sensor will perform any better. Still great results in todays mobile photography. Even Xdabbed camera which is great contribution cannot match results from RAW data and personal approach for photography. One minute for one photo and the results are uncomparable.
Anyone tried porting the Pixelmaster camera app from the various Asus Zenfones? It takes really incredible low light photos by reducing resolution to 2 megapixels and it is awesome (the only reason I fell envious of my brother's otherwise mediocre zenfone 5). Check here too, someone had plans of porting but not sure what happened to him since... http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2712403
jimakos29 said:
Anyone tried porting the Pixelmaster camera app from the various Asus Zenfones? It takes really incredible low light photos by reducing resolution to 2 megapixels and it is awesome (the only reason I fell envious of my brother's otherwise mediocre zenfone 5). Check here too, someone had plans of porting but not sure what happened to him since... http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2712403
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why should I want 2Mpx photos from 13Mpx camera? From 13Mox->2Mpx I will do awesome photos too! 2Mpx=fullHD , 2160p=4K got it? Rather show us those amazing photos
kultus said:
Why should I want 2Mpx photos from 13Mpx camera? From 13Mox->2Mpx I will do awesome photos too! 2Mpx=fullHD , 2160p=4K got it? Rather show us those amazing photos
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
again. it takes normal pics at full resolution, then there is a night mode which takes very very nice pics in dark situations at full resolution (better than almost any other phone out there) and then there is a special night mode that reduces pic resolution to 2 megapixels, but boy those night pics are the best I have ever seen.... Check this for example. and no worries about zenfone 5 camera being 8 megapixels. the zenfone 6 has 13 and same software...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_TPqwDYStI
so you still live in a world where more megapixels mean better images?
i.e. see why HTC went for lower mpx in its flagship devices...
about my "bullsh*t of the year"... do some reading and know some basics of the digital photography...
i never said that LG G2 camera is bad, read my post again & read hardware tech specs of the other devices...
i like the mi2raw app very much (see my posts there in the app thread) - it's the best thing that happened to this device considering the camera/photo...
and i think LG G2 camera hardware can do much more - especially on the strange "painted like" image compression effect which i hate so much...
i'd say - LG G2 is close, but no cigar
kultus said:
Bulsh*t of the month/year? :fingers-crossed: Only way to reveal the potencial of any and I mean ANY camera HW is to shoot RAW only! You can say Lg stock camera is bad and I will agree but not talk about HW whenn you didnt see pure RAW data. Just look at the samples I shot with the best android camera for photo enthusiasts: Mi2raw camera which is capable of capturing pure DNG files without freaky Lg jpeg engine, which is IMHO the worst I ever seen. I took indoor photos on ISO400-800 so dont blame the small sensor of more noise, no such a small sensor will perform any better. Still great results in todays mobile photography. Even Xdabbed camera which is great contribution cannot match results from RAW data and personal approach for photography. One minute for one photo and the results are uncomparable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because of RAW the G2 is one of the top android cameras, that is true. However, the flagship Lumia devices also shoot RAW.
Yes I know, iphone can shoot RAW too, so android is behind somehow...
60nine: Ive read everything you've written, thats why I had to react. I know a lot about photography, HW a more, so Im OK. Thanks. And about pixels, even 8Mpx iphone camera is worse than 16Mpx SGN4 camera so give me a break...HTCs cameras are the worst from the biggest flagship manufacturers. HTCs cameras lags of detail and lost every shootout with competition. And I will tell you something, you will need at least 2160p for viewing on upcoming 4K display devices...so now the pixels matters. I know that more pixels suffers from dynamic range and more noise, but it will be hidden in more Mpx photo with good postprocess. So if you find comparison between IP6 and LG G2 in RAW at same settings and same scene and IP6 will be better, youll have my respect and appologies.
Sent from my LG-D802 using XDA Free mobile app
i won't bother answering to a person who thinks more mpx means better images (on a same sized sensor), so cheers...
raw is not for an average users anyway
There a few topics that could use some up-voting to show Adobe we want good RAW support for our P30 phones.
https://feedback.photoshop.com/phot...rofile-for-non-bayer-sensor-depthsensor-usage
https://feedback.photoshop.com/phot...select-the-image-source-on-multicamera-phones
https://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/lightroom-mobile-allow-minimum-shutter-speed
https://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/lr-mobile-combine-tof-sensors-with-raw-images
https://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/please-add-superresolution-dng-automation
Adobe only cares about supporting Apple devices, they don't give a crap about Android devices. Sadly we are never going to see P30 Pro devices supported by Adobe. It has to be done by thirdparty developers.
/ Magnus
nurps said:
There a few topics that could use some up-voting to show Adobe we want good RAW support for our P30 phones.
https://feedback.photoshop.com/phot...rofile-for-non-bayer-sensor-depthsensor-usage
https://feedback.photoshop.com/phot...select-the-image-source-on-multicamera-phones
https://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/lightroom-mobile-allow-minimum-shutter-speed
https://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/lr-mobile-combine-tof-sensors-with-raw-images
https://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/please-add-superresolution-dng-automation
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They don't even care to fix the bug in the current version of LR. almost a month now, cannot import new photos
Magnus3D said:
Adobe only cares about supporting Apple device..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well so far I can import DNGs from all 3 of the Huawei cameras and shoot HDR DNG with the ultra-wide camera with their app. Not a total failure.
I use snapseed for now.
Thanks for linking to these. It would be a nice to have if Adobe gave a timeframe for supporting new phones.
I'm finding the dngs hard to process. There are weird colour shifts on the main camera. The wide angle camera is often under exposed and has huge vignetting. The 5x camera is relatively easy by comparison, just a bit more saturation and slight pincushion tweak.
Has anyone else made correction profiles for lightroom?
Sent from my VOG-L09 using Tapatalk
So far it helps me pulling the orange tone slider towards green and correcting red and purple to the left, but if there are skintones it gets harder.
Some users of another forum have created profiles for Lightroom
https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4384104
Sent from my SHT-AL09 using Tapatalk
Anyone know of a Google Cam version that doesn't have this annoying red/brown tint. Often the pictures come out really over 'warm'.
Here are some examples of what I mean:
(See attachments)
Picture straight out of Gcam
And then edited to what it should really look like
Anyone else noticed this problem?
I can't tell if it's purely Gcam or if it exists in all images from the camera and that it's just that Gcam exacerbates it.
Any settings anywhere or Camera apps that allow tweaking of tint settings and hdr etc?
Cheers
I think gcam oversaturates the image I've noticed it on my pixel 4 xl daily driver.
ROMSG said:
I think gcam oversaturates the image I've noticed it on my pixel 4 xl daily driver.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It does a bit, but on the G5 it seems to result in this weird brown/red tint to everything.
When I used it on my Nexus 6P it gave incredible photos.
I've started playing with Snap Camera HDR a bit more recently. This app is brilliant and is usually my go-to camera app, but Is been struggling to get good results with it on the G5.
However, I've recently dedicated some more time to fiddling with the settings and think I've now found some that get great results.
I'll post my settings when I get a chance.
tooplanx said:
It does a bit, but on the G5 it seems to result in this weird brown/red tint to everything.
When I used it on my Nexus 6P it gave incredible photos.
I've started playing with Snap Camera HDR a bit more recently. This app is brilliant and is usually my go-to camera app, but Is been struggling to get good results with it on the G5.
However, I've recently dedicated some more time to fiddling with the settings and think I've now found some that get great results.
I'll post my settings when I get a chance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please do, thanks.
Sent from my LG-H850 using XDA Labs
Hi, I notice that whenever I use my front camera, especially on messager. the quality is so low or blurry. Is anyone experiencing this?
Me too its even worse than my old oneplus 6 , I'm very disappointed
Same, I don't know why the GT 2 Pro has a really bad front cam. My old Xiaomi Mi 9T can do better do. The front cam of the GT 2 Pro has a very smudgy look which I don't know if it's because of the software or something else.
I recently got the phone and notice this too when taking pictures of items with lettering. It is not as sharp. My old Huawei P10 was better.
Is there anything to do about this? Would installing GCam improve this?
tcc13 said:
Is there anything to do about this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, get another phone. Selfie camera is below average - in every review you can read this.
tcc13 said:
Would installing GCam improve this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, it will improve, but not significantly. It makes sense especially for the main camera.
all software related, the front sensor is actually amazing. I get amazing results using third party apps.
dick_vigarista said:
all software related, the front sensor is actually amazing. I get amazing results using third party apps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Care to share those 3rd party apps
tcc13 said:
Care to share those 3rd party apps
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Free you can use open camera, it supports 4k on front camera and has camera2api support, and some gamma curves that helps a lot. But if you want amazing quality you can get mcpro24fps that supports 4k, 10bit color depth, HDR HGL profile recording, lots of gamma curves and gamuts, you can get front camera footage out of it that will make anyone think you using a professional camera if you know how to use them properly. Other option is motioncam pro that records full RAW DNG frames witch is crazy hi quality but very hard to use and extremely heavy to deal with. So my recommendation is mcpro24fps, and for photos gcam off course. If you don't use gcam in any android device you just crazy.
This video is from the front camera with mcpro24fps:
I can take a shot on full blow clear sky and sun tomorrow if you want to see the great dinamic range you can get
Wow, that is from the selfie lens? Amazing!!
mcpro24fps is in the google play store correct?
Is 8.4 the latest GCam? If so where is the best place to download the apk?
tcc13 said:
Wow, that is from the selfie lens? Amazing!!
mcpro24fps is in the google play store correct?
Is 8.4 the latest GCam? If so where is the best place to download the apk?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep, thats selfie camera, as I said.....amazing sensor but terrible Realme software.
Yes, mcpro24fps is on play store
For gcam go on the telegram realme gt2 pro gcam group you can find everything there.
Attaching here an example of the front camera dinamic range with proper software, not the stock camera blow out **** they provide.
TorstenH said:
I modified the AGC cam. The original source is: https://www.celsoazevedo.com/files/android/google-camera/dev-BigKaka/f/dl9/
Modification:
- Changed package name so Realme GT2 Pro exposes all lenses
- Added settings option which pops up if you long click on app icon on your launcher
If the app is crashing enter the settings via long click on app icon and change the Device Interface for all lenses. E.g. to "Pixel 2 XL (Taimen)".
----
Added base config. You need to unzip file before use.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have very nice results with this one mode.
tcc13 said:
mcpro24fps is in the google play store correct?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes
Wow, $23CAD for mcpro24fps
That dynamic range is crazy... So good.
tcc13 said:
Wow, $23CAD for mcpro24fps
That dynamic range is crazy... So good.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, try doing the same in the stock camera , you gonna look like a nuclear bomb exploded, I really never even bother opening the stock camera app, it makes me mad to see a good sensor wasted with this Realme software. Just the fact that front camera is capped at 1080 for no reason drives me crazy already.
I think the app is worth every penny. The developers are also amazing, just a while ago there was no support for 10bit HDR on the app for the gt2 pro, I asked about it on the official app telegram group and in one week they added support
dick_vigarista said:
Yeah, try doing the same in the stock camera , you gonna look like a nuclear bomb exploded, I really never even bother opening the stock camera app, it makes me mad to see a good sensor wasted with this Realme software. Just the fact that front camera is capped at 1080 for no reason drives me crazy already.
I think the app is worth every penny. The developers are also amazing, just a while ago there was no support for 10bit HDR on the app for the gt2 pro, I asked about it on the official app telegram group and in one week they added support
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you find presist.img from device ?
Because i need the same image
JHarlow said:
Did you find presist.img from device ?
Because i need the same image
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You need to buy the calibration tool and calibrate it yourself, there is no other way to fix it that I know