While it may seem like (and very well may BE) a stupid question, I'm not 200% sure one way or the other.. until recently I guess. Read on..
Last night I flashed to DCD's 2.10 ROM with 3.27 radio and go to test Google Maps. I see "GPS Activated", but nothing's picked up, no satellites. This seems like it would mean I'm probably NOT working with a Rev A ROM.
Well then I go from the regular old IE/PIE to Opera Mini 4 Beta 2 and speed test from dslreports.com/stest & mobilespeedtest.com... From dslreports I get "too fast/unstable" (whereas before, with PIE it would load "fine" and average about 600kbps) and from mobilespeedtest.com I get *2.35Mbps* (which I don't think is right/even possible. is it?)
I guess the ultimate question is - Is DCD's 2.10 ROM with 3.27 Radio running EVDO Rev A/GPS or not? Again, I know this seems stupid, and probably is, but this is place to come ask questions so I figured why not. Also, is it really possible that I was getting 2.35Mbps? I've tested a few other times with some read higher (2.6Mbps) and some a little lower (2.2Mbps) but I just don't trust it
well, theoretically, it's possible that you're getting those speeds. I personally doubt it, but it's impossible to say for 100% certain.
on the GPS thing: the first time, it takes a long time (some say as long as 20 minutes) to get the fix the first time, since it has to download a lot of data from the GPS sattelites to get a fix. some have better luck doing that outside. for me, it worked inside, but it did take a long time the first time, and then it all started working.
However, I don't like to harp on a repeating admonition, if you'll go back the last few days you'll find a plethora of posts on the subject that will tell you a lot more than I can in one short post.
So, short answer: Yes, you have Rev A and GPS, but you may not notice amazing speed differences with Rev A because it depends on the infrastructure of the local station and the GPS takes some time to initialize to start with. After the first time it'll get better.
My understanding is that Opera Mini uses a proxy to optimize data for mobile devices, so you're likely to get false speed test results through Opera Mini. PIE or Opera Mobile will give you more realistic speed test results.
Any other thoughts on this?
The leaked ROM that DCD is based on includes GPS. It doesn't include Rev A. The official release is supposed to include both, but Sprint has had unexpected difficulty with Rev. A, so we'll see.
The leaked ROM that DCD is based on includes GPS. It doesn't include Rev A. The official release is supposed to include both, but Sprint has had unexpected difficulty with Rev. A, so we'll see.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As far as I know, this statement is untrue. I thought BOTH gps and RevA exist in all of dcd's roms 2.0 and up
gcincotta said:
As far as I know, this statement is untrue. I thought BOTH gps and RevA exist in all of dcd's roms 2.0 and up
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the leaked radio does include rev. a
duh
why else are people getting a huge speed boost in rev a areas?
sovrce said:
While it may seem like (and very well may BE) a stupid question, I'm not 200% sure one way or the other.. until recently I guess. Read on..
Last night I flashed to DCD's 2.10 ROM with 3.27 radio and go to test Google Maps. I see "GPS Activated", but nothing's picked up, no satellites. This seems like it would mean I'm probably NOT working with a Rev A ROM.
Well then I go from the regular old IE/PIE to Opera Mini 4 Beta 2 and speed test from dslreports.com/stest & mobilespeedtest.com... From dslreports I get "too fast/unstable" (whereas before, with PIE it would load "fine" and average about 600kbps) and from mobilespeedtest.com I get *2.35Mbps* (which I don't think is right/even possible. is it?)
I guess the ultimate question is - Is DCD's 2.10 ROM with 3.27 Radio running EVDO Rev A/GPS or not? Again, I know this seems stupid, and probably is, but this is place to come ask questions so I figured why not. Also, is it really possible that I was getting 2.35Mbps? I've tested a few other times with some read higher (2.6Mbps) and some a little lower (2.2Mbps) but I just don't trust it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
RevA is part of the 3.27 radio, not DCD's roms. The new ones won't work WITHOUT 3.27, but that's where you're getting RevA
kmartburrito said:
RevA is part of the 3.27 radio, not DCD's roms. The new ones won't work WITHOUT 3.27, but that's where you're getting RevA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK, thank you. But are there any browsers (not using proxies - Opera) that'll fully utilize Rev A and not crash? I love Opera, you just can't play YouTube/flash videos. And while you CAN play those videos through PIE (and I have no issues playing them), the browser itself stalls out and is very slow and clunky.
REV-A and you;-)
The best way to tell if you are on REV-A is to install WMWIFIRouter and ICS or tether to your PC in some way, and go to speakeasy.net/speedtest and run your tests. You may not even be in a REV-A coverage area, but if so then your download will not change so much but your upload will be above 200k or more if signal is good. REV-0 upload speed is max 153.6k, REV-A is 1.8meg.
madman34 said:
The best way to tell if you are on REV-A is to install WMWIFIRouter and ICS or tether to your PC in some way, and go to speakeasy.net/speedtest and run your tests. You may not even be in a REV-A coverage area, but if so then your download will not change so much but your upload will be above 200k or more if signal is good. REV-0 upload speed is max 153.6k, REV-A is 1.8meg.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just using the stock program 'Internet Sharing' on my phone I get:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
and
So I am running a Rev A *CAPABLE* radio/ROM, but I'm (probably) not in a Rev A coverage area? Mid-Michigan area on Alltel, if that helps.
sovrce said:
Just using the stock program 'Internet Sharing' on my phone I get:
and
So I am running a Rev A *CAPABLE* radio/ROM, but I'm (probably) not in a Rev A coverage area? Mid-Michigan area on Alltel, if that helps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct, Alltel implemented Michigan EVDO as one of their first, before the DOM-A card was released, and the later markets like Louisiana and Kansas much later, after the DOM-a release, so they got DOM-A cards but did not have VER 4.01.106 Nortel software/firmware yet to put in them so they were REV-0 anyway but upgradeable. I am not sure which newer markets have updated as it is available now cause we are on 5 in VZW land. I am sure Michigan will swap their DOMs in but bet they have not yet, so you are right.
P.S. I know this stuff because I was NT NI and put most of it in ;-)
I am in a Rev. A area (Austin, TX) and have no speed increase, nor have I heard of anyone with a confirmed speed increase. Where is the evidence that people are getting Rev. A speeds? If you are, please post a screenshot. I know the official release is supposed to include Rev. A, but I've seen no evidence that the leaked version actually does. My speed tests have been consistent with what I was getting prior to the new ROMs, and others have reported the same.
You have to take into account that you're using RF not a direct connection, and that those max speeds include overhead and not raw data throughput. Rev A isn't some magical speed increase, it relies on your signal to the tower. Just like how you can get less than 54Mbps on 802.11g due to signal conditions, you can get less than the maximum data rate with EVDO.
In fact you can never actually get 54Mbps, just like you'll never really get 3Mbps+ with Rev A. Rev A actually builds directly of Rev 0 and adds some new modulation techniques that are used in conditions where the signal is good enough.
Then, you still can't be sure your phone is provisioned for Rev A, which it probably isn't because your carrier does not officially support that service on your phone yet.
AmazingLarry said:
You have to take into account that you're using RF not a direct connection, and that those max speeds include overhead and not raw data throughput. Rev A isn't some magical speed increase, it relies on your signal to the tower. Just like how you can get less than 54Mbps on 802.11g due to signal conditions, you can get less than the maximum data rate with EVDO.
In fact you can never actually get 54Mbps, just like you'll never really get 3Mbps+ with Rev A. Rev A actually builds directly of Rev 0 and adds some new modulation techniques that are used in conditions where the signal is good enough.
Then, you still can't be sure your phone is provisioned for Rev A, which it probably isn't because your carrier does not officially support that service on your phone yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am on Sprint. I am in one of the first areas that deployed Rev. A. I speed tested my EVDO connection before & after the upgrade with no discernible difference. The most noticeable speed increase with Rev. A should be on the upload, which has not changed at all. In fact, nothing has. This issue has been discussed across multiple forums and still not one person has posted evidence that this ROM activates Rev. A. Again, I'm not trying to be argumentative, but can you point me to any evidence that this ROM contains Rev. A? Sprint never said this leaked early build contains Rev A, only that the release build would. People assume it does because the release build was promised to, but all those that have tested it that I'm aware of have not shown a speed increase, either in upload or download speeds.
From the Engadget Mobile article about the leaked ROM: "Rev. A -- a feature promised by Sprint to be enabled at some point in the future when the Mogul was first released -- is also apparently going to be prominently featured when this update officially hits, but it's either flaky or switched off altogether in this particular build while the devs are still hammering out some last-minute issues." Just as I said in my first post in this thread.
Source: http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/01/26/new-sprint-mogul-rom-leaks-out-gps-support-and-all/
It is important to note that if you are using Opera Mobile for your speed tests the results will be misleading as Opera Mobile uses an intermediate server and then renders a "view" of your webpage and transmits it to your phone. So when you speed test using Opera you are speed testing the intermediate server NOT your phone.
How's this for some RevA proof for whoever wanted screen shots. My phone is tethered to my desktop via USB and using Internet Sharing.
do u kno if sprint is offering EV/DO in oklahoma yet
gcincotta said:
How's this for some RevA proof for whoever wanted screen shots. My phone is tethered to my desktop via USB and using Internet Sharing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Photoshop! Just kidding, thanks, that's exactly what I asked for. I (and Engadget) was wrong. Do you get those speeds consistently? Anybody else getting those kinds of speeds, especially, on Sprint?
Related
*** NOTE: For others that are coming to this thread because you have a similar issue, the problem is with the 3.27 radio ROM and is common to all custom ROMs and has nothing to do with dcd's ROMs. Hopefully will be fixed when new radio ROMs become available ***
I am running dcd's 2.3.2 ROM and it is great but I have found an issue with downloading files using IE or Opera. Opera seems to consistently freeze at around 172KB (+/- few KB) and then eventually says that the connection was interrupted.
If it helps, I also have 3.27.00 Radio ROM and Sprint PRL 60711 loaded.
Although I believe I recall this being discussed before, I could not find a thread so if one exists, please point me in the right direction.
Oh, and man is this ROM better than Sprint's ROM!
Update: I just tried to download Adobe Flash Player 7 for Pocket PC and it downloaded fine. However, I have tried to download Live Search for Windows Mobile from http://m.live.com and it consistently fails. Could it just be a problem on certain sites, like m.mobile.com, in the way they handle downloads?
As a side note, I tried www.dslreports.com/mspeed to test my internet speed and I was averaging about 600kb/s. I thought revision A should be faster than this? This got me to wondering, how do you know if you are in a revision A area? I mean, Sprint says that I am but the phone just shows Ev... is there supposed to be a different icon for revision A speeds version revision 0?
I'm beginning to wonder whether or not the problem with live search is not based on MS's site. I had a problem downloading it, but not a problem downloading anything else. I've seen quite a few problems downloading it (from phones, of course). Wouldn't surprise me if it was indeed on MS's side. They aren't known for being stable
The problem is a bug in the 3.27 Radio Rom, Not the stuff DCD has done.
The Radio (which is what enables the GPS and Rev A) is a leaked beta and will choke on large downloads.
Doubt DCD (or anyone else other than HTC) will be able to fix this. It is also likely the reason the official release of the GPS Rev A Rom from sprint has been delayed.
Asphyx said:
The problem is a bug in the 3.27 Radio Rom, Not the stuff DCD has done.
The Radio (which is what enables the GPS and Rev A) is a leaked beta and will choke on large downloads.
Doubt DCD (or anyone else other than HTC) will be able to fix this. It is also likely the reason the official release of the GPS Rev A Rom from sprint has been delayed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hope someone 'leaks' a better radio soon.
BTW, it isn't directly size related. I have downloaded very large files, and I have had it hang on smaller files.
I didn't want to make it seem like I was placing blame with dcd... his roms are so much better than Sprints that it is not even a competition. I really just wanted to confirm that the problem existed on other phones besides my own that are running dcd's 2.3.2 rom. It sounds like my suspicions of the 3.27 radio being the culprit are correct. I am happy... in a tongue in cheek way... to know that you are all having the same problems.
Yep.. Cannot download microsoft live on mine and I using a different rom but the same radio.
I am still wondering how you know if you are using EVDO rev. A verses rev. 0. My icon always shows Ev... is there a different icon for rev. A and I am just not getting it? How do you know your phone is using rev. A besides testing your download speeds?
I noticed that you can't download the cab from wls.live.com on a laptop if you teather through the PDA either. Very odd.
I haven't seen anything to indicate rev A either.
Confirmed that it does not work for me tethered to my laptop either. I am not really surprised though, it is still using the same radio. I definitely would not go back to a stock ROM for this minor issue though.
Still waiting for someone to confirm or deny that a separate indicator exists for EVDO revision A coverage. Mine always shows Ev or 1X.
See my post in the 1.58 radio thread for some interesting findings after I ran some tests on the new 1.58 radio. Even if you've decided to leave your Athena stock, you need to make this upgrade.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=2447473&postcount=38
bull****.
as usuall I using 1.38.00.00
I have as 3G and H (HSDPA) where my provider have a cover in this area.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-Speed_Downlink_Packet_Access
wiki your help!
You prove your ignorance.
Sure the other versions support 3G/H. Ive used 1.47, 1.50, 1.57 and now 1.58 and yes they support high-speed protocols.
If you actually read my post in the other thread you would see I said that 1.58 does high-speed much faster than the other radio versions and has much higher sensitivity thresholds.
But you were too busy being self-important... and wrong ... to do that. Enjoy your far-slower radio version.
I am using 1.58 and for the first time in my athena owner life I an having really fast UPLOAD. PLUS I have 3G coverage in the same places where I had 2G before (inside my home, inside my office and it is hard to believe they changed the cell in both places at the same time).
In some other places I have HSUPA coverage too http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-Speed_Uplink_Packet_Access
The overall feeling is also a fast download. I think download does not start until it receives the request of the upload. That's why I noticed it right away for surfing and mail reading. I normally download only a small portion of the mail, and if I want it I click to download the rest. With previous radio, the waiting time to get the rest was noticeably longer.
It's good having someone actually measure the improvement. Thanks techntrek.
Glad to post the numbers. I would be interested in seeing numbers from others (before and after).
New all-time best speed, yesterday. Previously my best was 983 kbps. Now it is 1169 kbps.
wow.
Hi
I get a message that the file is corrupted (#270) I came to 7%, then the device resets.
Any suggestions
Hans
Try to re-download the installer.
Hi
Did that twice. Are going to try again tomorrow
Hans
Are you fully unlocked?
Hi, Still no luck. Maybe a stupied question but what do you meen about unlocked? I can use my x7500 with any "phonecompany" that I want. I donĀ“t have to use someone special.
Hans
Unless you have specifically run olipro's unlocking software you are only sim unlocked. His software takes away the remaining locks, such as the one that allows you to install non-factory roms (such as the radio rom). Look in the "hard-spl..." thread in this sub-forum.
I will do that, thanks for your help
Hans
Recently I flashed my radio from 1.50 to 1.58 and I must say it is a lot better! I get HSDPA at all times now where before it would occasionally swap between Edge, 3G and H now it stays solid H all the time and goes to Edge only where there is really no 3G available.
I also noticed that at home for example. I always got a very weak H signal, but after the upgrade I get two bars at all times, also tested with Skype, seems to run smoother and I don't get as many disconnected calls as before.
I suggest everybody should upgrade the radio, it is well worth it!
michyprima r4 radio 1.58
x7501 running michy's r4 with radio 1.58, can rec calls or mms, infact the speed is great when it works, but stability has gone way down, i've seen a lot of people using connex to go back to 1.2spl and then using 2.04d with r1.58. i was wondering if people could post what roms they are using that they see good stability with.
My SPL is 1.2 and the stock rom WM6. I see a huge performance differance with this radio over 1.50, no stability issuses at all.
acids7n said:
i was wondering if people could post what roms they are using that they see good stability with.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AP4, no difference with older radios or this one - all stable.
Michi's V4 SPL 1.2 and 1.58. Coming from stock and stock WM6 there is a good performance increase in radio, typically at least 1 more bar wherever I am and no stability issues.
Because the other thread is getting way too big and contains alot of useless posts, I started this thread for FACTS only and "scientific" research. I will update this post (or the second) with findings and possible solutions that are given in this thread.
@mod, maybe this can become a sticky?
Please read before posting to keep it clean!
Please don't post:
- Your testing results without a succesful driving test because we have enough of them already
Test protocol:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=20878091&postcount=781
- Your conspiracy theories, just wait what ASUS has officially to say
- Posts with no additional information (thus which has been said already by another user, or something like "thanks")
- Posts telling people not to whine and live with it
- Useless discussions if ASUS did or did not gave an official statement
- Useless discussions why ASUS removed the GPS from the spec sheet on their USA website
- Posts telling what you are going to do with your Transformer (return it etc.)
Please do post:
- Proposed fixes which have proved to work before or which have a good scientific backing
- Test results of these fixes (we don't need hundreds of them... 2 - 3 are enough)
- Other significant details which can help to come to a solution
The problem:
- The Transformer Prime (TP) can't hold a lock on GPS satellites or can't even see them and WiFi is relatively weak.
So what do we know already?
- The GPS chip is a BCM47511 Broadcom chip: http://www.broadcom.com/press/release.php?id=s548713
- Antennas are located in the top left corner (looking from the back): http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=20923418&postcount=1
- Extensive testing by users showed that the TP is losing lock very often during movement and accuracy is highly fluctuating
Possible causes:
- All metal back of the TP
- Firmware/software bugs
- Bad/weak/cheap antenna
Proposed fixes (not confirmed working):
- Changing the gps.conf file:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=20915954&postcount=910
or
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=11342772
Work-arounds:
- Using your phone's GPS by connecting the tablet with bluetooth to it:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=20891671&postcount=840
- Use the app "TetherGPS":
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=20934275&postcount=8
More info:
Pictures of the TP disassembled:
http://www.wirelessgoodness.com/201...ime-gets-torn-down-kal-el-pictured/?nggpage=2
FCC information on the TP:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=20934050&postcount=7
First response by ASUS support (which is considered not to be an official statement!):
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=20910929&postcount=884
The original thread (97 pages and counting):
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1404646
Please PM me if I forgot anything substantial or made a mistake and I'll add/correct it in this post Don't reply here in the thread!
WE ARE STILL LOOKING FOR SOMEONE WHO CAN REMOVE THE BACKCOVER OF THEIR TP AND LOOK IF GPS/WIFI IS WORKING BETTER.
Reserved.....
Reserved for test videos later...
Could do with being made sticky.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Proposed gps standard test protocol is at http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=20878091#post20878091
Seems to be a new firmware downloading this morning
This might be a fix.
Version 8.8.3.33
FCC information
If you're interested in digging around the FCC's website for pictures and reports:
Website here:
http://transition.fcc.gov/oet/ea/fccid/
Then enter:
Grantee Code: MSQ
Product Code: TF201
The first row shows WiFi-related information.
The second row shows Bluetooth-related information.
Both have very interesting diagrams! Despite them being either WiFi or Bluetooth related reports, they have some cool diagrams of the Prime.
GPS work-around - via wifi
Another work-around (in addition to bluetooth) is to get gps information from a cell phone and transfer to the Prime via wifi.
I've installed and tested TetherGPS and it worked perfectly. There is a lite version available for free on Android Market but it has time limitations. I tested with the lite version and then paid $2.99 for the full version. Here is the link https://market.android.com/details?id=com.comptonsoft.tgps&feature=order_history#?t=W251bGwsMSwxLDUwMCwiY29tLmNvbXB0b25zb2Z0LnRncHMiXQ..
I love how everyone wants their posts to be stickied
Samsung Galaxy Note, which succefully works with GPS and GLONASS, has the same Broadcom chip, thus it is reasonable to check the GP related files from him.
The latest 8.8.3.33 firmware update seems to have definitely improved things... For me at least anyway. I just updated and took the tab out onto my balcony (where it previously was unable to detect ANY satellites at all). Within 20 seconds it located 14 satellites and locked to 10 of them. The connection strength left much to be desired, but alas, I had achieved a lock.
The update also updated the GPS version from 5.8.12 to 5.8.13, so a change has definitely been made.
Sorry, I haven't done a full test as required in the original post, but given the firmware update, I think that this information is worth posting regardless.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Stepping outside onto my balcony gave me this, where previously it would not pick up anything. On my last test, a 45 minute drive, no fixes were achieved, with a maximum of 6 satellites detected.
Version numbers here. I did not take note of the WiFi version before this update, only GPS, so if someone could make known the 8.8.3.29 WiFi version that would be great.
Any others who are able to update and do a more comprehensive test, please do so.
Edit#2: With WiFi assist turned off I was still able to go outside and achieve a 8/13 fix within seconds.. though that's probably to do with the aGPS data being saved from the previous session.
obvious observation, but this does have a factor on GPS tests:
The orientation of the GPS antenna has a great deal with how it performs. Because over half of it is shielded by the aluminum backplate, it needs at least part of the front screen facing the sky to get a good reception.
as i am reading the specs of the GPS module. i'm reading GPS with combined GLONASS support. backwards compatible with old drivers.
is it using both systems?
about the problem. the chip does most processing itself. it leaves the final interpretative task to the CPU. The TEGRA 3, wich does it's own scaling. has the GPS been tested in several performance modes?(battery saver/normal etc) it seems that this last task isn't getting done properly.
with ICS requiring different drivers. (at least on devices as DHD) it seems most likely they're using an old compatible driver for 3.2 honeycomb. and await ICS before using latest drivers improving signal and calculation transfer to the TEGRA 3 (unsupported in old driver?)
i find it hard to believe that it's hardware related, FCC tests and why buy a receiver put it in and sell it, disable it. leave the receiver out in the first place. (what about certifications that have to be re-done to allow it without GPS receiver?)
if looking troug GPSCONFIG.XML from asus transformer Prime dump. there's typo's in the descriptions. A LOT of different arguments are there compared to code found online (cyanogen for samsung P4. etc.)
don't know what PPM means in the frqPlan. cause only the 2ppm is not commented. the 100 PPB and 300PPB are commented. RFType being used is GL_RF_47511_BCRM_EXT_LNA. in commented section it says RfType="GL_RF_BARRACUDA_EXT_LNA"
seems really messy. and that's just a config. (found in /etc/gps/gpsconfig.xml)
hoping ICS with better drivers is the fix
WendigoNL said:
as i am reading the specs of the GPS module. i'm reading GPS with combined GLONASS support. backwards compatible with old drivers.
is it using both systems?
about the problem. the chip does most processing itself. it leaves the final interpretative task to the CPU. The TEGRA 3, wich does it's own scaling. has the GPS been tested in several performance modes?(battery saver/normal etc) it seems that this last task isn't getting done properly.
with ICS requiring different drivers. (at least on devices as DHD) it seems most likely they're using an old compatible driver for 3.2 honeycomb. and await ICS before using latest drivers improving signal and calculation transfer to the TEGRA 3 (unsupported in old driver?)
i find it hard to believe that it's hardware related, FCC tests and why buy a receiver put it in and sell it, disable it. leave the receiver out in the first place. (what about certifications that have to be re-done to allow it without GPS receiver?)
if looking troug GPSCONFIG.XML from asus transformer Prime dump. there's typo's in the descriptions. A LOT of different arguments are there compared to code found online (cyanogen for samsung P4. etc.)
don't know what PPM means in the frqPlan. cause only the 2ppm is not commented. the 100 PPB and 300PPB are commented. RFType being used is GL_RF_47511_BCRM_EXT_LNA. in commented section it says RfType="GL_RF_BARRACUDA_EXT_LNA"
seems really messy. and that's just a config. (found in /etc/gps/gpsconfig.xml)
hoping ICS with better drivers is the fix
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this may be the answer and cause here within your post. it makes the most sense and further back up claim of it being software/driver issues. great find! ICS may be the key to solving this whole ordeal.
At this point it looks to be a hardware software combination I cannot even lock a satellite after the update......
WendigoNL said:
as i am reading the specs of the GPS module. i'm reading GPS with combined GLONASS support. backwards compatible with old drivers.
is it using both systems?
about the problem. the chip does most processing itself. it leaves the final interpretative task to the CPU. The TEGRA 3, wich does it's own scaling. has the GPS been tested in several performance modes?(battery saver/normal etc) it seems that this last task isn't getting done properly.
with ICS requiring different drivers. (at least on devices as DHD) it seems most likely they're using an old compatible driver for 3.2 honeycomb. and await ICS before using latest drivers improving signal and calculation transfer to the TEGRA 3 (unsupported in old driver?)
i find it hard to believe that it's hardware related, FCC tests and why buy a receiver put it in and sell it, disable it. leave the receiver out in the first place. (what about certifications that have to be re-done to allow it without GPS receiver?)
if looking troug GPSCONFIG.XML from asus transformer Prime dump. there's typo's in the descriptions. A LOT of different arguments are there compared to code found online (cyanogen for samsung P4. etc.)
don't know what PPM means in the frqPlan. cause only the 2ppm is not commented. the 100 PPB and 300PPB are commented. RFType being used is GL_RF_47511_BCRM_EXT_LNA. in commented section it says RfType="GL_RF_BARRACUDA_EXT_LNA"
seems really messy. and that's just a config. (found in /etc/gps/gpsconfig.xml)
hoping ICS with better drivers is the fix
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Possibility..
But with the current bootloader status, we can't even tinker with GPSconfig or other drivers to see if it'll fix the issue (like they did it with Acer Iconia and few other android devices).
Another reason for skepticism..
If your theory is correct, it really boggles my mind on how Asus is reacting & responding to GPS fiasco. If s/w or tinkering on drivers can solve the issue, Asus doesn't have to react by "removing GPS from specification" or calling it "bonus feature".
It's a possibility, and I'll be grateful if it is.. but it is leaning more towards hardware issue.
PrimeTimeBro said:
At this point it looks to be a hardware software combination I cannot even lock a satellite after the update......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same boat here. GPS was working pretty good for me before the firmware updates today. Now I can't get a lock at all, I let GPS status sit there for 30 minutes... never even saw a single sat.
My GPS seems to get an initial lock faster but is still unstable after the update. Even without being moved, receiving several satellites with a decent fix, it will suddenly lose everything and then start searching again. I had this same problem before the update. I realize the signal strength is marginal, but to just dump everything and start over is not acceptable. A drive using google maps was the same as before the update, resulting in many signal losses along with loss of position. This marginal operation is with the Prime on the dash directly under the windshield with a decent view of the sky. Other devices I've used do not have this problem. So in my opinion, it is reasonable to say Asus has not yet solved the GPS problem.
n11 said:
Another work-around (in addition to bluetooth) is to get gps information from a cell phone and transfer to the Prime via wifi.
I've installed and tested TetherGPS and it worked perfectly. There is a lite version available for free on Android Market but it has time limitations. I tested with the lite version and then paid $2.99 for the full version. Here is the link https://market.android.com/details?id=com.comptonsoft.tgps&feature=order_history#?t=W251bGwsMSwxLDUwMCwiY29tLmNvbXB0b25zb2Z0LnRncHMiXQ..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Lite version foreclosed 100% of the time I tried to start it AND did not provide widgets it said it would. Version on my phone had widgets and no FC issues.. WTF
Asus of Taiwan confirmed that it is Hardware issue (backplate). Oh, and they aren't planning to do anything to rectify the situation since "they can't do much about it" (except change the design of the back).
ok so i tried the latest and greatest blaze modem that released yesterday...
my speeds practically went up 9 fold, here's the story
using saurom, and latest blaze modem
however, here's what im running in to
the latest blaze modem that was released yesterday has increased my speeds by alot
yesterday when i was on telus sgh t989 modem, i was getting about 386kbps at my house and only 2 bars of service. on top of that, at the time it seemed as though my 4g was having a bunch of micro disconnects. also my upload was around 2kbps
today i come home and try the latest blaze modem, and my download went up to 3.8mbps (decent improvement i would say in the least), no micro disconnects, double the amount of bars in reception, but my upload is around 10kbps...
10kbps takes a long time to send mms... (trying not to be whiny, but that's all i use upload for when im not on wifi)
anybody else having this issue?
Can I ask what rom you are currently on? Also have you tried on another rom?
starting to hate this captcha image verifications
anywho, i'm a bit of a noob(sorry, but i never needed to really mod anything untill i bought the galaxy note), so i will answer this to the best of my knowledge.
im on saurom, haven't tried anything else
Some things just don't make sense. I'm also on saurom and its the only rom I can get decent speeds on. Someone else in another thread said he got good speeds on the unofficial collective. I get 10Mbps on saurom and only 3Mbps on collective.
I'm trying to figure out why but it seems everyone has different input. I wonder if saurom version matters cause I run a older build 4a.
well im glad that im not the only one that feels that way (regardless of how noob i am)
i tried multiple guides, and always stuck with the easy way
so far this is basically what i have
adw and used the latest blaze modem
saurom (latest according to the post that i saw)
the build.prop.test (of courst moved the .test part, still using this) that supposedly magically enhances reception
problems i have
a) download has improved but upload is retarded
b) reception still sucks even after the build, but when my phone is at two bars, immediately when i touch it, reception doubles...??
once again, i know im a noob, but im great at following directions... i dunno is anyone else having the issues i have?
oh and oddly, whenever i try to do a speedtest, my receptions goes from 3 bars to 4 bars... (25%...really?) as soon as speed test is done, it reverts..... does this makes sense to anyone?
tekhnologia said:
oh and oddly, whenever i try to do a speedtest, my receptions goes from 3 bars to 4 bars... (25%...really?) as soon as speed test is done, it reverts..... does this makes sense to anyone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh and another odd thing, when i run speed test on wifi, i only get around 5.6mbps, when my computer says 32mbps.
the app im running is speedtest.net on the phone
the site im running is speedtest.net on the computer...
does this makes sense to anyone?
tekhnologia said:
oh and another odd thing, when i run speed test on wifi, i only get around 5.6mbps, when my computer says 32mbps.
the app im running is speedtest.net on the phone
the site im running is speedtest.net on the computer...
does this makes sense to anyone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wifi tests on my phone show the full 25Mbps my Internet is capable of. I would suggest u try the rom I'm on if u can find it. Saurom 4a and don't apply that build.prop you are using, it could be causing you more harm then good.
Retest and repost afterwards
ok so deleted the "aftermarket" build.prop file from my system folder, and replaced it with the original build.prop that i had
results:
reception isonly at 2 bars (20% less)
speedtest with wifi shows: 15.747 mbps
speedtest on comp: 18.87 mbps, marginal difference, understandable
speedtest on 4g: 4.854 mbps, upload is at 2.487 mbps per second, YOU SOLVED THE ISSUE, although i must admit i feel dumb for not thinking of this... you get a kudos, if you ever swing by rochester, i'll buy you a round of beer
Exactly which blaze modem did you use? I just cleared my cache and flashed the blaze telus one. Rebooted twice and did a speed test and am only getting .06 mbps and somehow 1mbps upload speed. Before with jus the telus modem i only got like 512k and never passed 1mbps. I am running latest saurom and live in a pretty decent coverage area too, i also have it set to hspa only. Any reasons why mine suck??
Glad it worked out for you. Now where did u get that build.prop file? I don't remember seeing one with a .test at the end. Was it one of tomin's?
I also had the build prop.test and ill try and replace the original one and see what happens.
---------- Post added at 10:39 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:38 PM ----------
Yes the buld prop.test was one of tommins.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Somebody help me! My phone speeds sucks.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
circuit.007 said:
View attachment 976074
Somebody help me! My phone speeds sucks.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ouch, u do need help. Lol
timgt said:
Ouch, u do need help. Lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know right I've tried almost everything. I dont want to have to give up my note because of such slow speeds. Trying a different blaze modem right now. Praying it works.
circuit.007 said:
I know right I've tried almost everything. I dont want to have to give up my note because of such slow speeds. Trying a different blaze modem right now. Praying it works.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do me a favor, and try this. It's gonna suck cause your gonna have to start over but this is my setup. I get 10Mbps downloads. I wanna know if its my combo that works for others.
This ROM = http://mirror10.downloadandroidrom.com/download/GalaxyNote/roms/SauromICSROM/SAUROM_XLA2_RC4a.zip?token=884590944
This Modem = http://bayfiles.com/file/6FwV/WrxD5a/Blaze_4G_LB7_radio_ATTNOTE.zip
This build.prop = http://www.2shared.com/file/yulMhKVb/build.html
someone try it out and let me know.
the build i used can be found here
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1573568
did wonders for me, once again though you'll probably want to revert to the stock build.prop, as well as remembering to clear cache...
just to make sure i think i've covered all areas i will once again say what im running
latest saurom
stock build.prop
modem listed in above link
beats audio mod (i HIGHLY doubt this has anything to do with it)
i should mention that yes, in my previous post i only went up to 3.3 or 3.4mbps with the current setup, but that's the fastest in my area atm...
and as far as the reception issue, well honestly, quality of service and reception are two totally different things, so im not sure if what i said about reception was really worth anything
anyways this seems to have worked for me really well so far, will test for another 24 hours, if i feel anyhting is up, i'll post
timgt said:
Do me a favor, and try this. It's gonna suck cause your gonna have to start over but this is my setup. I get 10Mbps downloads. I wanna know if its my combo that works for others.
This ROM = http://mirror10.downloadandroidrom.com/download/GalaxyNote/roms/SauromICSROM/SAUROM_XLA2_RC4a.zip?token=884590944
This Modem = http://bayfiles.com/file/6FwV/WrxD5a/Blaze_4G_LB7_radio_ATTNOTE.zip
This build.prop = http://www.2shared.com/file/yulMhKVb/build.html
someone try it out and let me know.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright timgt Ill try out exactly what you have and report back. Wish me luck.
tekhnologia said:
the build i used can be found here
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1573568
did wonders for me, once again though you'll probably want to revert to the stock build.prop, as well as remembering to clear cache...
just to make sure i think i've covered all areas i will once again say what im running
latest saurom
stock build.prop
modem listed in above link
beats audio mod (i HIGHLY doubt this has anything to do with it)
i should mention that yes, in my previous post i only went up to 3.3 or 3.4mbps with the current setup, but that's the fastest in my area atm...
and as far as the reception issue, well honestly, quality of service and reception are two totally different things, so im not sure if what i said about reception was really worth anything
anyways this seems to have worked for me really well so far, will test for another 24 hours, if i feel anyhting is up, i'll post
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok so with my setup i was running, i still had a few disconnects that i wasn't happy about, and my upload went from 2.4mbps to an average of 90kbps....not cool... way too much of a difference
so im gonna try this as well
keeping my fingers crossed for both of you!
Verizon Note 3
Purchased Brand New back in November
I've had zero signal issues phones entire life on 4.3 however since upgrading to K.K it's been awful like honestly terrible. I have areas in my house now where I have zero service period, never had that problem before. Also ongoing not a one night thing.
Happens on multiple KK based roms not just one example, also tried NC2, NC4 and now back on MJE radio and signal still sucks... is anyone else experiencing this? It was fine on 4.3 then out of the blue turned to crap
Also WiFi / Bluetooth have been flawless just cell radio in general sucks now, not just 4G either I barely get 3g anymore in areas and can't even send text messages
Same here
I have been dealing with the same thing. I can't ever remember having any issues with any Verizon device in the areas that I normally travel. Since taking the update, I run into problems everywhere. Almost to the point where I want to go to a different phone.
Same. Exact. Thing. Here.
Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
Joe92T said:
Verizon Note 3
Purchased Brand New back in November
I've had zero signal issues phones entire life on 4.3 however since upgrading to K.K it's been awful like honestly terrible. I have areas in my house now where I have zero service period, never had that problem before. Also ongoing not a one night thing.
Happens on multiple KK based roms not just one example, also tried NC2, NC4 and now back on MJE radio and signal still sucks... is anyone else experiencing this? It was fine on 4.3 then out of the blue turned to crap
Also WiFi / Bluetooth have been flawless just cell radio in general sucks now, not just 4G either I barely get 3g anymore in areas and can't even send text messages
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can't remember where I found it but there is a build prop edit to tweak the radios. I did it 3 months ago and it has stuck through the kk update to nc3. Try Google samsung galaxy note 3 radio tweak or poor signal. Sorry I can't remember.
Sent from my SM-N900V using XDA Free mobile app
Go to this site. Download all of the radios. But I am going to say that the MJE radio will be the one that will give you back your consistent connection. You will need Odin. If you end up having any difficult time downloading any of the items off this address. I could send you everything via drive or what not. Just hit me up in a PM. I just have to figure out how to turn on PM notifications. Otherwise I will forget to check if I have any. Any way, hope this works for you. Also, to the person that posted the idea about there being some kind of tweak to the build prop, try to find that link and post it here. Reason being is that the newer radios enable the newest higher frequency bands. And allows for greater speeds. But, obviously they suck. So if I could get the newer radio and make the phone get better signal and not drop network. Than I would rather do that. As I am sure others here would as well. And assuming those others have Root on their devices. Any way, I am just rambling on. I'm off to bed. I have to go to work soon and then get home so as can drop the sub frame on my car to replace my rear motor mount.
Sent from my SM-N900V
---------- Post added at 01:15 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:11 AM ----------
Forgot to post the link.
http://www.droidforums.net/forum/sa...ngrade-your-verizon-note-3-s-modem-radio.html
Sent from my SM-N900V
Jaytronics said:
Go to this site. Download all of the radios. But I am going to say that the MJE radio will be the one that will give you back your consistent connection. You will need mobile Odin. If you end up having any difficult time downloading any of the items off this address. I could send you everything via drive or what not. Just hit me up in a PM. I just have to figure out how to turn on PM notifications. Otherwise I will forget to check if I have any. Any way, hope this works for you. Also, to the person that posted the idea about there being some kind of tweak to the build prop, try to find that link and post it here. Reason being is that the newer radios enable the newest higher frequency bands. And allows for greater speeds. But, obviously they suck. So if I could get the newer radio and make the phone get better signal and not drop network. Than I would rather do that. As I am sure others here woukd as well. And assuming those others have Root on their devices. Any way, I am just rambling on. I'm off to bed. I have to go to work soon and then get home so as can drop the sub frame on my car to replace my rear motor mount.
Sent from my SM-N900V
---------- Post added at 01:15 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:11 AM ----------
Forgot to post the link.
http://www.droidforums.net/forum/sa...ngrade-your-verizon-note-3-s-modem-radio.html
Sent from my SM-N900V
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
were you able to get mobile odin to work I have it and says device not supported or found I let it make a dump and still nothing
Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
texaswickedtoys said:
were you able to get mobile odin to work I have it and says device not supported or found I let it make a dump and still nothing
Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I apologize for this. But I misspoke when I said Mobile Odin. It is actually just supposed to be Odin for the PC. I typed it when I was going to bed. I must have been out of it.
Sent from my SM-N900V
Oh ok
Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
Same exact problem. I can have 2 bars signal. Hit send for a call and watch the bars go to zero then doesn't even connect.
I've been on the MJE radio. You can find the MJE modem tar in the Verizon Note 3 Android Development section, the post is by BeansTown106.
Regardless of what people say about modems and signal, etc.. NC2 and NC4 were subpar for me. MJE is stable and I get excellent signal and data speeds.
I'll try that radio today thanks
Yes my signal is awful even with mje radio on 4.4.2 as well. time to roll back. Its like I'm on sprint network.....
Sent from my SM-N900V using XDA Free mobile app
I'm in the same boat and it's very frustrating I just got off a call with verizon and they wanted to put me through all of this bs to troubleshoot and reset my phone so I said no thanks and got off the phone.
I've had the same issue. I'm currently on JasmineROM1.5
Here's what I did and it fixed the issue for me. Go to Settings/more settings/mobile networks/network mode. Mine said Global. Change it to what I have in the pic. Reboot. Mine is good to go now.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
I have noticed a difference between how KitKat and Jelly Bean handle radios. In 4.3, the phone would quickly get a mobile data connection (i.e. working data, as shown by the solid white 1X/3G/4G symbol in the status bar) on any network type and even at very low signals. Since KitKat, the phone does not want to connect to data on 3G as much or 1X most of the time. It will just stay there with the connection type grayed out (indicating no data) even though the signal could be 3 bars.
As I had only upgraded to NC2, the phone is back on MJE and will likely remain there unless what is after KK doesn't break more stuff (like VPN, which is still broken on Samsung devices). After rolling back to MJE I can confirm that radio performance is equally bad (or good) as before I updated to KK.
The GF is using my Note 3 and works in a very low signal area (flips between an unusable 1 bar of 3G, 1-2 bars of 1X, and no signal). Other devices like Moto phones and the 5S get 1 bar of LTE there or 3 bars of 3G, and there are people even tethering away. She can't call, send/receive texts, or do anything else so it is useless at work.
Hey guys thank you for all the replys and I will definitely take a look at the responses more in depth when I have a moment.
Just some things I've noticed
It's not just me, apparently there is a lot of feedback of others with the same issue
I HAVE swapped modem files specifically all while staying on a KK based rom I've tried NC2 NC4 and now MJE radio and they all suck when using the KK software even though the MJE radio was fine on 4.3 for me
Given that others are reporting it, I find it hard to believe that my phone is defective / hardware related and it must be something in the firmware/KK specifically
It's gotten to a point where I need to take immediate action. My wife called me this morning and I was not even notified, my phone never rang period and I have nothing in my call logs but my phone was on the entire day with, quote fingers, ""signal"" and this never happened previous. God forbid something bad happened and she is unable to reach me due to a software defect. That is a BIG deal, I didn't even know she tried to call me 4 times in a row until she got home later that night and asked why I didn't pick up, I said what do you mean? It never rang
I'm debating on going back to 4.3 as a whole until the issue is identified and resolved unless any other solutions come out... I'm all about having fun and flashing roms but when my wife can't reach me when she needs me and I get ripped a new asshole things need to stop lol
Sent from my SM-N900V using XDA Free mobile app
this is not a solution but thought i would post what happened to me.
had N3 since launch and no signal issues
upgraded to KK Stock NC2 leak and had no signal issues
upgraded to NC4 firmware to fix reboot issue for recovery etc.. and HAD signal issues - BAD "No mobile Network" where it used to work perfectly
tried MJE Radio switched back and forth and all over and had signal issues still
tried a full NAND restore and complete factory reset and still had signal issues
ordered a replacement that came with MJE and NO signal issues - worked like it was working on release date
upgraded to NC4 Jasmine rom and did the NC4 firmware upgrade again - worried i would have same results but NO signal issue
now can switch to any KK rom with my NC4 and NO signal issue
i can not explain why the NC4 upgrade killed my release date N3 signal and the replacement N3 has no issues but something has to be related to me getting a newer device is all i can guess
Just wanted to say I'm in the same boat. Since updating my signal has been abysmal and it's killing my battery. I even got a new Sim card, no change. These radios really suck.
I actually hated MJE, such a horrible radio. I'm actually running hyperdrive with MJ7 and loving the signal quality. Though I specifically use MJ7 since I had the best signal for Band 4 with it. I thought NC2 was okay, but I tried it out only for a few hours once I found out you could change radios.
fletch33 said:
this is not a solution but thought i would post what happened to me.
had N3 since launch and no signal issues
upgraded to KK Stock NC2 leak and had no signal issues
upgraded to NC4 firmware to fix reboot issue for recovery etc.. and HAD signal issues - BAD "No mobile Network" where it used to work perfectly
tried MJE Radio switched back and forth and all over and had signal issues still
tried a full NAND restore and complete factory reset and still had signal issues
ordered a replacement that came with MJE and NO signal issues - worked like it was working on release date
upgraded to NC4 Jasmine rom and did the NC4 firmware upgrade again - worried i would have same results but NO signal issue
now can switch to any KK rom with my NC4 and NO signal issue
i can not explain why the NC4 upgrade killed my release date N3 signal and the replacement N3 has no issues but something has to be related to me getting a newer device is all i can guess
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is something that has been bothering me on these boards. The definition of firmware is applied 3 ways and nobody references which way they are using the term.
Firmware seems to mean any or all of these 3 when in most cases it is firmware=bootloader/modem
1. To all of the software as a whole
2. To just the bootloader
3. To just the os, rom, distro of android
Now I have seen you here quite often and know your not a noob when it comes to this but...
You upgraded to the nc2 bootloader you would have used odin to do this.
you then odin the nc4 bootloader to fix an issue with ss (does not make much sense as you needed to wait for a new version of SS for this to be fixed...work around being reboot the phone then click recovery in the 10 second boot window)
you switched modems nothing fixed it
you then did a nand restore which would have only restored the /system, /data, /cache partitions not the /boot odin would be required to change that
It seems to me that your other phone had a bad bootloader flash.