upgrade 2 crc rom with wm6.1 - 8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin

Hi Guys!
i upgrade my hermes with the crc rom which uses wm6.1.
even i h change my settings for umts and obex my phone wastes lots of battery charge so i had to charge sometimes twice a day.
it wastes also lot of battery charge when i turned off the radio!!
Does anybody know how to change this ****ty behavior?
B'R'
el loco
previously i had the rom of schaps which was really great.

No Ideas about this issue??

loco09 said:
No Ideas about this issue??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Posting at the appropriate thread would certainly help! don't start a new one, no one will look!

Related

New Radio 1.38.30.10 Imate??

There is a new Radio from Imate in the wiki http://wiki.xda-developers.com/index.php?pagename=Hermes_ExtractedRadioRoms Anyone try it and is it any better. I didnt download it yet but I imagine take the RUUSigned and put with RUU Wrapper v4 and I'll try it out today.
Here is the thread about the ROM update that is containing the new Radio:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=299597
I combined the RUU with the Olipro RUUWrapper v4 and uploaded to a NON Rapidshare mirror and added to wiki.
http://www.bestsharing.com/files/INdT1250288/RUU Radio Only 1.38.30.10.exe.html
Radios can be uploaded to the xda ftp, the M$ crap was just for ROMs.
been trying it out for the past 2 days...i don't know if it's the new combo of the new Lvsw build with this radio but my battery has gone down faster. I work in a building where typically reception is from poor to non-existent. I carry the phone in my pocket and set to auto band mode and the past two days working from 8 to 1 Battery life have been going down to 40%. On the older wm6 builds with 1.38.00.10 I can typically get around 70% by the time I leave work...
So what's everyone else getting? Have you experienced a decrease in battery life?
On a plus note, I can see that it hangs on to a 3G signal longer before it switches to Edge and a very slight increase in reception.
its no real change from the 1.38 update.... just fixes for WCDMA on the 850Mhz band....
walshieau said:
its no real change from the 1.38 update.... just fixes for WCDMA on the 850Mhz band....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
must be the new OS i'm runnin'...maybe I should try the new Black
guapinoy said:
been trying it out for the past 2 days...i don't know if it's the new combo of the new Lvsw build with this radio but my battery has gone down faster. I work in a building where typically reception is from poor to non-existent. I carry the phone in my pocket and set to auto band mode and the past two days working from 8 to 1 Battery life have been going down to 40%. On the older wm6 builds with 1.38.00.10 I can typically get around 70% by the time I leave work...
So what's everyone else getting? Have you experienced a decrease in battery life?
On a plus note, I can see that it hangs on to a 3G signal longer before it switches to Edge and a very slight increase in reception.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I noticed the battery drain too.
I noticed something "strange" but I can't assure (yet) if it's caused by this Radio ROM or by the WWE AKU 3.3.1 ROM.
The strange behaviour is that my phone auto switched-on apparently without reason (?). It happens when I enter in the underground and the phone losses the signal, and when I leave the underground and the phone catch the signal again...
Since I've installed the Radio ROM and the AKU 3.3.1 almost at same time, I don't know what is the cause. But I will return to a prior Radio ROM in order to know it.
In any case, did anyone noticed something similar?
BTW: Bootloader 1.11 is really fast flashing radio!!!
Fail at 7% ...
Trying to upgrade from the HTC ROM 2.11 which install SPL 1.11
When I run the radio only upgrade, it will start flashing but will stop at around 7%, then reboot.
Any ideas?
Jean-Yves
jyavenard said:
Trying to upgrade from the HTC ROM 2.11 which install SPL 1.11
When I run the radio only upgrade, it will start flashing but will stop at around 7%, then reboot.
Any ideas?
Jean-Yves
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hope you have Hard-SPL installed...if not...you have bricked your device
Regards,
Primoz
VivaErBetis said:
I noticed something "strange" but I can't assure (yet) if it's caused by this Radio ROM or by the WWE AKU 3.3.1 ROM.
The strange behaviour is that my phone auto switched-on apparently without reason (?). It happens when I enter in the underground and the phone losses the signal, and when I leave the underground and the phone catch the signal again...
Since I've installed the Radio ROM and the AKU 3.3.1 almost at same time, I don't know what is the cause. But I will return to a prior Radio ROM in order to know it.
In any case, did anyone noticed something similar?
BTW: Bootloader 1.11 is really fast flashing radio!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tests finished. It's not a radio behaviour; it's a AKU 3.3.1 behaviour. Does anybody knows how to deactivate it?
Pc78 said:
Hope you have Hard-SPL installed...if not...you have bricked your device
Regards,
Primoz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not at all.
After 7% it reboot and that's it.. back to normal.
I can't install Hard-SPL for some reasons...
JY
jyavenard said:
Not at all.
After 7% it reboot and that's it.. back to normal.
I can't install Hard-SPL for some reasons...
JY
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I assume you cannot enter into OS if you don`t have HardSPL....cause if you can enter to OS you can repair it...
Regards,
Primoz
No Battery Drain here
VivaErBetis said:
I noticed the battery drain too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My battery is holding charge just fine. My phone hasn't been plugged in since I left for lunch from work yesterday afternoon. I have used it to make several calls and emails since yesterday and it's still showing a full charge.
Of course I live in an area that has really good coverage as well, so my phone doesn't search for signal that much.
I can report the same... no noticed change to battery life.
I have noticed a massive change with battery life. Also i cant go a call more than 30sec with out it breaking up, never a problem before with 1.34
Anyone else experiencing this problem?
I have been running version 2.11 for the HTC Qtek (South Africa) on my imate JasJam, it was running 1.38.00.10
I upgraded the radio to 1.38.30.10, and three times in 24 hours now I've noticed that the jasjam was asking for my PIN code and had switched the phone off.
This never happened with the earlier 1.38.
Has anyone experienced something similar ?
Thanks
JY
No, not to me..
Maybe depends by the ROM installed..
I upgraded the Radio for 2 days and can tell the followings: -
The time required to search network in Hong Kong (3 HK) has been reduced and the signal is stronger than 1.38.00.10. However, I notice one problem, I tried to call my mobile a few times after the upgrade, and 2 out of 10 calls had been directed to voice mail (signal was strong at that time). Don't know it is the problem of this rom or I had that problem long ago (as I hadn't tried before to call myself so many time).

All PDAVIET 4.0.0.0.6-Touch users with HUGE battery drain listen!

Hi, everyone knows, that 4.000.6 Touch is the best ROM ever made, but as I read through many threads and topics on xda-dev, it seems that probably about one fifth of all users of this great rom is having a terrible problem with its battery drain. Normally, the drain is supposed to be quite good, even better than on WM5. Usually about 4% per night, some even 2% or less.
BUT those with the battery problem have often 5-10% per ONE HOUR. The drain after wake up is from 50mA to 120mA and the drain when using the phone (no wireless, display at maximum level) goes from 140mA to 450mA and so. (Drain after awake is supposed to be around 5mA on well-working ROM).
SO, if you have experienced similar problem, please write down your phone settings. Mine are below and I HAVE drain problem. So we can find out, if there is something we have in common or not and we´ll be able to solve the problem. (it is enough if you post only your Radio (GSM) version, but for being sure, I post everything )
Greetings
HTC Prophet
ROM version: 4.0.0.0.6 WWE --------------l
ROM date: 2/02/07 ---------------------------l
Radio version: 02.07.20 ----------------------l (these can be found in settings/system/device information)
Protocol version: 413.1.03 ------------------l
ExtROM version: 4.0.0.0.6 PV-Touch -----l
IPL: 2.09 ----------------------l
SPL: 2.09.0000 --------------l(these you can see during soft-reset)
I have radio v 2.19.21 and had battery drain issues but also with radio rom 2.69.xx. Usually 1-3 soft resets resolve the draining issues (and I mean _real_ soft resets with the stylus and not with ShutXP).
These problems seem to be related to the lockup-on-boot problem, the first time my battery drained that fast was after one of those lockups.
All that makes me think the problem could be registry-related, since WM6 flushes some reg settings when you do a real soft reset and keeps them when you make a software-induced soft reset.
I had the same issue as Infestor,
Not usually any massive issues, although my battery does seem to drain quicker than some of the other roms I've tried, but once my boot screen froze my battery was practically flat by the morning ( it froze overnight I think)?
The problem is in the new camera app...
ok, I´ll try few soft soft-resets and see what will happen. But I´ve never had any problems with boot lockups (and I have flashed this ROM several times already).
Also the new camera drivers shouldnt´t cause the problem, because then everyone using this ROM would have this problem as well. Btw I think, that in 4.000.6 Touch are the old camera drivers used, but I am not sure, so I will check this out...
robinhlozanka said:
ok, I´ll try few soft soft-resets and see what will happen. But I´ve never had any problems with boot lockups (and I have flashed this ROM several times already).
Also the new camera drivers shouldnt´t cause the problem, because then everyone using this ROM would have this problem as well. Btw I think, that in 4.000.6 Touch are the old camera drivers used, but I am not sure, so I will check this out...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's the old camera driver in the rom not the new driver
Well, well... After around 7 soft-resets (in different combinations) the problem seems to be still here... 135mA with screen on level 3
I thought that flash on Gollums new ROM may solve the problem, but Infestor is apparently using it and he experienced problems too, so it will not be probably something breathtaking
the camera driver in 4.000.6-Touch is really the old (supposed to be good) one: Camera 3.02.23018
Who will solve this is the Master of Riddles.
I havecome to the conclusion that it caused by SR sometime don't clear the memory and therefor there is not enough memory to boot the system so it just gets stuck.... we need an app that starts first in the boot that clears the memory or something like that.... I think that the solution we should look for
Hm, yeah that sounds interesting, but again, I have to say that my Prophet after a week of hard work and lots of SR haven´t experienced any boot stuck. It works with its memory very well, only my battery acts like water pump during summer floods. But certainly such an app might help solve even this.
robinhlozanka said:
Hm, yeah that sounds interesting, but again, I have to say that my Prophet after a week of hard work and lots of SR haven´t experienced any boot stuck. It works with its memory very well, only my battery acts like water pump during summer floods. But certainly such an app might help solve even this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What apps are in startup folder? might be related to some of them using battery and not getting unloaded when not in use?
gullum said:
What apps are in startup folder? might be related to some of them using battery and not getting unloaded when not in use?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let me see... hm, nothing special. Only poutlook.ink, Services.ink and WiFiInit.Ink
Somewhere I´ve read about WiFiInit problems, but it should have been solved already I think.
i think i figured the problem, i had some occasional HUGE battery drain issues,
then my phone wakes from stand by the battery drain was huge.
i did a hard reset, installed everything except battery status, and everything got a lott better.
i think there is an incompatibility with battery status beta 1.04 and this rom.
I had the problems with PDAViet 5 and 6, I installed gullums Touch v6 just yesterday and I have no complaints on this one so far...
elFahd said:
i think i figured the problem, i had some occasional HUGE battery drain issues,
then my phone wakes from stand by the battery drain was huge.
i did a hard reset, installed everything except battery status, and everything got a lott better.
i think there is an incompatibility with battery status beta 1.04 and this rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have installed battery status just because I wanted to know how big the drain really is. I wouldn´t install it if I haven´t experienced battery problems before BS instalation, because I like SPB pocket plus much more But maybe thi sversion is somehow strange...I will find out, what version is mine... it is 0.04.203
i must add that strangely even when the thing is in absolute low consumption (hibernation???) it wakes up. and after the previously configured time goes on then it tourns off.
i know this because:
a) have seen it
b) ching battery status (i think its the name), that also has an up time counter, shows me that it has been on more than it should, 'cause i hiibernated it.
there you have a power consumption issue...
The BatteryStatus that goes well in this ROM 4.0.0.6 is the 219
The radio goes the 2.61 well to me
PS: Not English, i use translator, sorry by the annoyances
battery draining is so if you use htc cam.if you remove htc new cam your problem should be fixed, but another problem may be begun,you can not use our perivious cam,because all things in it rotate 180 degrree.
I have flashed to Gullums V6 Touch and battery problem is solved
It is not as quick as Cloudyfa´s one, but still good and very stable - and lasts more than one day
mine does get me into the 3rd day.
it depends on how many times i connect to my wifi network... or how many hours i listen to my mp3 gallery....
usually it last 2 days... using pda viet, and although the little thingy that it turns on ....
I have the problem, too.
My xda neo shows in the morning 100% and, without use, in the afternoon 8%.
My battery hold only one day without use, then I must charge again.
o2 xda neo
PDAViet 4.0.0.0.6 PV-Touch and the "finger" Cube activation from gullum
02.19.21
4.1.13.09
G4 (0001)

WM 6.1 and Battery Life

Upgrade from wm5.0 to wm6.0 and then wm6.1 has been worth the effort and it has definitely given new lease of lief to HTC Gene- Both Old and New
One of the issues which is commonly being reported is faster draining of battery life after upgrade to wm6.1. I am infering this not only by the postings in this Forum , but many other similar forums on the net.
This issue is being mainly reported by HTC Old gene users, if I am correct.
The reported reasons for faster battery drain are multiple. Few of them are
1. Upgrade from wm6.0 to wm6.1 results in faster battery drain. I understand W6.1 upgrade is must and really makes your gene fast, However I could never calibrate/compare both these OS on the battery parameter.
2. Manilla ROMs eat the battery fast.
3. Suprisingly and Interestingly- I also read (across some forums) even the SIM cards have also a role to play. HTC gene with SIM card of one teleoperator had different battery drain experience when compared to SIM of the other teleoperator.
4. SD card use may also affect the battery use.
5. Even there is one suggestion, we should never flash a mobile when SIM is in. It may damage the SIM. Have anybody experienced this? I have flashed my gene mutliple times with always the SIM Card in HTC gene and I faced no issues (was I not doing the right thing)
All WM 6.1 users may have varied opinions on Battery life issue.
techmate said:
Upgrade from wm5.0 to wm6.0 and then wm6.1 has been worth the effort and it has definitely given new lease of lief to HTC Gene- Both Old and New
This issue is being mainly reported by HTC Old gene users, if I am correct.
The reported reasons for faster battery drain are multiple. Few of them are
5. Even there is one suggestion, we should never flash a mobile when SIM is in. It may damage the SIM. Have anybody experienced this? I have flashed my gene mutliple times with always the SIM Card in HTC gene and I faced no issues (was I not doing the right thing)
All WM 6.1 users may have varied opinions on Battery life issue.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have always been flashing ROM with the SIM in the mobile...can someone confirm if we do have to remove the sim while flashing...
Sumit,ankit,Ramersonw whats your thought on this...
Flashing Correct Roms never damage sim cards. And the reason why SDCard is recommended to be removed is because in some firmware, mostly in old gene, the bootloader gets stuck when it enconters RUU connection from both cable as well as an SD Card, which as you might know can also be used to flash ROMs. this problem is not seen in New GENE (as far as i know). But sim cards have nothing to do with flashing, i can say this after 800+ flashes i have done.
Ya, you are correct I also did not face any issue flashing the ROM with SIM on. I mentioned this in my post, as I saw this one of the suggestion/view from someone on some forum.
BTW could anybody share has upgrade from WM5 to WM6.1 seen substantial battery experience?
I find WM6.1 a much improved ROM , but is it correct that WM5 ROM are more battery friendly?
^I dont quiet agree with the battery thing. There is something wrong with the old gene XIP that chefs in this forum including me have got. Because, the problem doesnt exists on New Gene. I think, if we can find a WM 6 rom for old gene and then use its XIP to port 6.1 ROMs, battery problem will be solved. I am deeply investigating this issue and its got something to do with Filesystem drivers and filters, that i am sure. lets see
i think its just the Phone
hi
this is what i feel is the reason for batt life
i think it is about usage i think this is not designed for a person like me who is in sales and has heavy call in comming and outgoing i did not feel any batt problem when i was using non WM phone so may be WM os takes up a lot of batt is what i feel u see the whole of last week i was using my spare Motorola ( non WM)and the batt life was great 2 days and its an old mobile
so my feeling is this phone isnt made for heavy phone user its for light users who are at office and have the option of recharging the batt as an when they want
pls not im one of those guys who has changed my phone in every 6 months and the last one was this gene (hope i dont change again cant afford anymore )
the above is my feeling after using almost every brand of Non WM and now using WM phone
techmate said:
Ya, you are correct I also did not face any issue flashing the ROM with SIM on. I mentioned this in my post, as I saw this one of the suggestion/view from someone on some forum.
BTW could anybody share has upgrade from WM5 to WM6.1 seen substantial battery experience?
I find WM6.1 a much improved ROM , but is it correct that WM5 ROM are more battery friendly?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No Hari, that is not the case. I talk to my girlfriend hours with this phone, still i get 2 days of backup. Its just because of the battery issue we are having for old gene.
Sumit,
True something is amiss in ROM for OLD GENE. I find your V1.04 much battery friendly but a more sophisticated version V2.0 hard on battery.
Is it that newer builds may have some compatability/hardware issue with OLD Gene or some features actually not meant for OLD Gene are hard on battery life?
Remember HTC 3400 (OLD GENE) has only been launched with WM5.0 and officially no ROM upgrade has been given by them
People like you have and some great developers /contributors have kept the HTC gene live
BTW during these discussions if we are able to find some tweaks for battery issues that will be great and will really help all of us.
Sumit,
I am Agree with u. I also use my new Gene with Ur's 6.1 V2 R1, and also I am Is in sales and doing a lots of call, checking lotus Note Mail. My Battery Life is fine. It goes hole day..
techmate said:
Upgrade from wm5.0 to wm6.0 and then wm6.1 has been worth the effort and it has definitely given new lease of lief to HTC Gene- Both Old and New
2. Manilla ROMs eat the battery fast.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi buddy i am just sharing my experience here i have tried lomlom's fusion ROM in the past ....i have been using it for at least a good 3 months or so which is a manila ROM and i have not seen any decrease in battery performance and to mention i have a OLD gene...so i don't think that Manila ROM's eat the battery fast...
Re: Battery Life Vs Network
One thing you guys are missing out is battery life is directly dependent on the signal strength, the worse the strength, the more battery the device will eat up, trying always to get a good signal. When I am travelling on train, my battery wont last even 12 hours . Even without talking. So take a note of that too. And my personal experience with AirTel is that network quality is very poor, as far as Kolkata goes, where as Vodafone has the best quality, so whenever I put in my Vodafone SIM, my battery life automatically increases. Please note that even if your signal is showing 100%, it may not be actual. As most of you must have noticed, the moment you make a call or recieve a call, signal strength drops (not always though). For example in my office (With airtel), the signal strength is always 100%, but to attend a call, everyone has to run out of the office .
You have a very good point there Shaunak
i think u did not get wat i meant @Krazy
hi
what i meant is their are 8XXX and 7xxx old gene mine is a 8xxx old gene
what i meant is pls chek if this batt problem is with the users of 8XXX old gene or 7XXX old gene because im having no battery problem with any of ur Prouser roms so thought if may be we can clear it out it might help u
its not about my phone and ur phone(we are both using 8xxx) im asking could it be about 8xxx and 7xxx old gene just a suggestion on an area we can chek on
krazy_about_technology said:
No Hari, that is not the case. I talk to my girlfriend hours with this phone, still i get 2 days of backup. Its just because of the battery issue we are having for old gene.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@hari : Oh, i did not got what you intended. Sorry, and thanks for enlightening me
@everyone: Yeah, so far we have tried checked ONBL, SPL and GSM versions but they dont tell anything about which gene is having battery problems and which don't. I request people to try posting the serial nos also if they are having battery problem.
Registry tweaks for battery
Hi all,
I was wondering whether the various regsitry tweaks for battery power usage work. I found some of them while browsing some of the forums
As said while illustrating these tips " I owe No Responsibility for any damage"
I just found them on the forums, am using them and sharing them to you. I will share my experience and request you to use them at your own risk.
1. HKLM\Comm\AsyncMac1\Parms\DisablePowerManagement
Change Dword value from 1 (default) to 0
2. HKLM\Comm\Irsir1\Parms\DisablePowerManagement
Change Dword value from 1 (default) to 0
3. HKLM\Comm\PPTP1\Parms\DisablePowerManagement
Change Dword value from 1 (default) to 0
4. HKLM\Comm\L2TP1\Parms\DisablePowerManagement
Change Dword value from 1 (default) to 0
5. [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Drivers\SDCARD\ClientDrivers\Cl ass\SDMemory_Class]
"DisablePowerManagement" = dword : 0
Good Luck.
These tweaks are already there in Schaps Advance Config Tool, just for enlightenment of everyone
Krazy thats great. I somewhow missed it. However I find by default these are disabled.
My experience is the tweaks work and are worth a try (enable the power management features).
Ya, by default for some strange reason, they are disabled. I'll try to find on the net if there is any reason for this. I have turned these on, and checking performance. Lets see.
BTW, .NET programmers here should check out a software called Pocket C#, its a compiler and IDE using which you can create .NET software on the phone itself, i really liked it. I made a small puzzle program using it on my phone itself

[Q] Radio ( something other ? ) and battery life

Hello.
Recently I tests different ROMs. Little longer I have Novembre5 Clean from June with radio 1700.
Generally I noticed , that if radio is not in use, one can work with tg01 relatively long time. However it is enough to start internet connection ( palringo or IE ) and battery life is less than 1 hour. I realize that backlight is active then and it consumes a lot of energy but with executed navigation software like Garmin XT with GPS on and backlight on , battery is able to live above 3.5 hour.
Unfortunately I did not check how situation looks with original Toshiba WM6.5 ROM.
I know gsm transmiter can issue even 1W of power but as I know it can happen only when there is very poor quality of connection so it rather does not explain so fast battery discharging. It looks like gsm transmiter emits 1W all the time gsm connection is active.
Is anybody able to explain it ? Are radio versions more or less power consuming ?
Regards
fxdjacentyfxd
fxdjacentyfxd said:
Hello.
Recently I tests different ROMs. Little longer I have Novembre5 Clean from June with radio 1700.
Generally I noticed , that if radio is not in use, one can work with tg01 relatively long time. However it is enough to start internet connection ( palringo or IE ) and battery life is less than 1 hour. I realize that backlight is active then and it consumes a lot of energy but with executed navigation software like Garmin XT with GPS on and backlight on , battery is able to live above 3.5 hour.
Unfortunately I did not check how situation looks with original Toshiba WM6.5 ROM.
I know gsm transmiter can issue even 1W of power but as I know it can happen only when there is very poor quality of connection so it rather does not explain so fast battery discharging. It looks like gsm transmiter emits 1W all the time gsm connection is active.
Is anybody able to explain it ? Are radio versions more or less power consuming ?
Regards
fxdjacentyfxd
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This was a problem I faced with all Novembre 5 roms, Battery life. I thought that the phone's battery life was supposed to be like that, Until i tried cooked WM 6.5 roms, and I was really surprised
Try the rom in my signature and fixes are available in the thread, you'll be really glad with battery life.
Regards
wafeeq said:
Try the rom in my signature and fixes are available in the thread, you'll be really glad with battery life.
Regards
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks
Any fixes I can see there are concerned only with GPS. Am I right ?
It is possible I would have to change radio to other version - maybe 1700 ( there are different oppinions what radio is the best in Poland ). May it has any influence on battery life ?
Regards
fxdjacentyfxd
fxdjacentyfxd said:
Thanks
Any fixes I can see there are concerned only with GPS. Am I right ?
It is possible I would have to change radio to other version - maybe 1700 ( there are different oppinions what radio is the best in Poland ). May it has any influence on battery life ?
Regards
fxdjacentyfxd
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1- There are some fixes I posted in the thread for manila, like weather update and finance tab etc...
2-Changing radio:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=823706
And for my experience Radio has nothing to do with battery life
wafeeq said:
1- There are some fixes I posted in the thread for manila, like weather update and finance tab etc...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could You upload version with manila ( and radio like in original thread - 5005.1700.05 ) to any human server ?
This link :
http://share.yunfile.com/file/zhaochengw/602b29cb/TG01 WM21908+Manila20161332.rar/
is tragic
Regards
fxdjacentyfxd
If the mobile phone is struggling to find a signal, it will use more power to search for it.
elder T said:
If the mobile phone is struggling to find a signal, it will use more power to search for it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with You but it was testing in my home in the centre of the city, so it is hard to assume that signal strength is small. I suppose that described in tg01 user's manual talk time about 4-5 hours is pure fiction.
Regards
fxdjacentyfxd

solution to the problem of battery, I have !!!!!!!

after a thousand tests with the battery, I solved the drainage
to do this:
data- off 3g-on
22:30 - 9:00 = 97%
my rom - custom rom russian
my radio - 2.14
I tested with 3g off and off data and : 22:30-9:00 = 68%
prefiero esto a dejar el movil 7 h para k se cargue,1 gracias? solo?vaya tela , encima hay gente que protesta, madre mia cuanto ignorante
can work with all roms, sorry for my English
XBmod-WP7-V1.04b
radio 2.12
4:30--11:30---7h Data-off 3G-off Bat-75%
00:00--9:00---9h Data-off 3G-on Bat-94%
by rome said:
after a thousand tests with the battery, I solved the drainage
to do this:
data- off 3g-on
22:30 - 9:00 = 97%
my rom - custom rom russian
my radio - 2.14
I tested with 3g off and off data and : 22:30-9:00 = 68%
can work with all roms, sorry for my English
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello !
If this does work, I will love you forever!
After a 5 days with Windows Phone 2007 on my HTC HD2 -- which I absolutely LOVED! (alhtough I was very skeptical at first) -- I had to remove it last night and go back to Windows Mobile 6.5 Exactly because of the Horrible battery drainage.
Can other people also confirm that (cause its a hussle to flash Windows Phone 7 again). Anyone who can confirm I would be grateful!!
thanks again.
elitegroup said:
XBmod-WP7-V1.04b
radio 2.12
4:30--11:30---7h Data-off 3G-off Bat-75%
00:00--9:00---9h Data-off 3G-on Bat-94%
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What does this mean-- in both cases you had 100% charge?
So you are essentially confirming this (weird) combination of settings is directly related to battery drainage,?
ndamianou said:
What does this mean-- in both cases you had 100% charge?
So you are essentially confirming this (weird) combination of settings is directly related to battery drainage,?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes, in both cases 100% charge.
Seems like it's not working when we can't pick up 3G, because the battery drain is too important.
I'm a bit confused...
When you turn your data - off, doesn't that mean that u can't synchronize your e-mails and stuff anymore?
prefer to do it manually each and the battery lasts me 2 or three days to do it self every 30 minutes, with this configuration has lasted me 3 days with normal use, I and others will work
Such remedy are not a fix
edited title, what have you tried?? many people with battery drain and do not comment if you work them ??????
huismeester said:
Such remedy are not a fix
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with you... If we have that type of phone it's because we need data connection! But if it's confirmed this solution is better than the flight mode i will give it a try this night.
It works for me! Now I have 3-4 Ma battery drain in standby!
Thank you!
Radio 2.14
ROM WP7 DFT
What if I use wifi instead of 3G?
gsm83 said:
It works for me! Now I have 3-4 Ma battery drain in standby!
Thank you!
Radio 2.14
ROM WP7 DFT
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
how did you managed to know yout ma battery drainage?
by rome said:
after a thousand tests with the battery, I solved the drainage
to do this:
data- off 3g-on
22:30 - 9:00 = 97%
my rom - custom rom russian
my radio - 2.14
I tested with 3g off and off data and : 22:30-9:00 = 68%
can work with all roms, sorry for my English
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i have better idea, if you want to save battery dont tern the phone on keep it off then you will 3 days battery ;-)
edward-riko said:
i have better idea, if you want to save battery dont tern the phone on keep it off then you will 3 days battery ;-)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes thats the way for battery,s
edward-riko said:
i have better idea, if you want to save battery dont tern the phone on keep it off then you will 3 days battery ;-)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
stop saying nonsens! and playing it smart! priority is for the battery drain for me! so this can be a solution! cause betwene 12h with data and 3days without data y choice is clear
projektk said:
stop saying nonsens! and playing it smart! priority is for the battery drain for me! so this can be a solution! cause betwene 12h with data and 3days without data y choice is clear
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no need for that language mate, its only a solution for some people, to be honest turning the phone off is actually a very reasonable suggestion.
Killing data will result in several aspects of your phone not working, given that the point of WP7 is to make it MORE intigrated with our on-line lives it does seem a tad silly to kill off almost everything that makes WP7 to good...but your choice i guess.
I have another best for you, charge the phone every 6 hours, which I will upload every 3 days
the moment is what is, you can not do anything, I have set for people to try and have more battery life, no comments that are left over

Categories

Resources