[Benchmark] atom exec varies rom [UPDATE - 17/8/2009] - iPAQ rw6828, XDA Atom ROM Development

just want to share with the community
not a very scientific way of testing, hard reset and no today plugin. softreset before test. all test is plug with charger on.
actually i did this for me to know which rom to use, since my priorities are:
- need the most ram i can get
- fast
the test rom i used are:
a. atom homer285 6.1 20270 (A2DP: fully working)
b. atom exec TJ 6.1 21051
c. atom exec TJ 6.5 21728
d. atom exec TJ 6.5 23009 (i think i did something wrong here, as the test was slower. the first one to test )
e. atom exec jaime 6.5 21728
f. atom exec TJ 6.5 23016 (kitchen)
g. atom exec wm5 14929
result for the memory (without any today plugin):
a. +- 26/27
b. +- 26/27
c. +- 24/25
d. +- 18/19
e. +- 24/25
f. +- 24/25
g. +- 26/27
result for speed, you can see the attachment. i think i messed up on the 23009 ROM. from what i can see is, the graphic is faster on 6.1.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
For me, the choice is a bit hard, i like th 21051, fast and lots of memory. but i really miss chome screen. so a bit torn on "b" and "c".
EDIT: updated TJ 6.1 21051 test with file system index

---

aibonlengket said:
just want to share with the community
not a very scientific way of testing, hardreset nad no today plugin. softreset before test. all test is plug with charger on.
actually i did this for me to know which rom to use, since my priorities are:
- need the most ram i can get
- fast
the test rom i used are:
a. atom homer285 6.1 20270 (A2DP: fully working)
b. atom exec TJ 6.1 21051
c. atom exec TJ 6.5 21728
d. atom exec TJ 6.5 23009 (i think i did something wrong here, as the test was slower. the first one to test )
result for the memory (without any today plugin):
a. +- 26/27
b. +- 26/27
c. +- 24/25
d. +- 18/19
result for speed, you can see the attachment. i think i messed up on the 23009 ROM. from what i can see is, the graphic is faster on 6.1.
For me, the choice is a bit hard, i like th 21051, fast and lots of memory. but i really miss chome screen. so a bit torn on "b" and "c".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, Why don't you try mine 21728 TTL. I would like to see since even though it is the same TJ's build it has a different modules re-allocation.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=421349

---

Jaime Méndez said:
Hi, Why don't you try mine 21728 TTL. I would like to see since even though it is the same TJ's build it has a different modules re-allocation.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=421349
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hmmm.. that is interesting. I'll try your rom maybe next weekend. trying to look for some free time. someone else could do it too actually. spb bencmark is free.

---

Added some more ROM, and the newest 23016.

---

redo test for TJ 6.1 21051 with file system index
the stock rom has a really fast file system index.the difference are a lot. others test are just a small difference. (opps, the picture is saying 21951, i typed it wrong. it should be 21051)

---

waiting for any new update........