[HACK] Adding codes lines to build.prop in Froyo - Nexus One Android Development

Originally Posted by stampere
you can edit the build.prop by
adb pull /system/build.prop c:\where\you\want\to\put\it\
open with wordpad and add the following lines
ro.ril.hsxpa=2
ro.ril.gprsclass=12
ro.ril.hep=1
ro.ril.enable.dtm=1
ro.ril.hsdpa.category=8
ro.ril.enable.a53=1
ro.ril.enable.3g.prefix=1
ro.ril.htcmaskw1.bitmask=4294967295
ro.ril.htcmaskw1=14449
ro.ril.hsupa.category=5
save the file
adb remount
adb push c:\where\you\want\to\put\it\build.prop /system/
reboot so that the settings take effect
________________________________________________________________
Stampere suggested this over in Paul's thread with no replys. The hxspa and gprsclass are not included in the Froyo build.prop anywhere I can see. They were included in CM 5.0.6.
Has anyone added these to Froyo and do they help or are they unnecessary and will conflict with the new Froyo 4.0.6 radio build?

I added the first two and it helped a lil....wondering the same thing tho....

Are you sure all those options are still relevant? My froyo image has none of these and performs well. I can get higher throughput by adding
Code:
ro.ril.hsxpa=2
ro.ril.gprsclass=12
But the rest are largely undocumented and should remain at default unless someone can prove what they do.
The biggest issue is the radio. With Froyo, my 3g disconnection issues are GONE, so now we can focus on latency and throughput.

damentz said:
Are you sure all those options are still relevant? My froyo image has none of these and performs well. I can get higher throughput by adding
Code:
ro.ril.hsxpa=2
ro.ril.gprsclass=12
But the rest are largely undocumented and should remain at default unless someone can prove what they do.
The biggest issue is the radio. With Froyo, my 3g disconnection issues are GONE, so now we can focus on latency and throughput.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is my point exactly. While I'm still getting some Edge flipping on Froyo radio in weak signal areas like work building, if the throughput is higher then why not add it? I don't think it can hurt anything
The rest are "relatively" undocumented as Cyanogen said he didn't know what they did, therefore he wasn't going to mess with them. My 2 thoughts were:
(1) If throughput were increased, would power consumption decrease as data would be transmitted and completed faster...or
(2) Would adding additional code lines conflict with the current image somehow as they were obviously left out on purpose?

Since this has been confirmed as a test build, perhaps some of these other properties will show up in the official build?
I too have better connection with the froyo radio - but weak throughput. I'll research and try some of these and report back if I find anything positive.

prscott1 said:
Since this has been confirmed as a test build, perhaps some of these other properties will show up in the official build?
I too have better connection with the froyo radio - but weak throughput. I'll research and try some of these and report back if I find anything positive.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I added the hsxpa and gprsclass entries to my build.prop and will test also when I get out of work into a 3g environment, lol. I had modded this in CM 5.0.6 and played with hsxpa settings of 1 and 2. 1, I believe is WCDMA preferred and 2 is universal or something like that...

my only question would be are these changes necessary, or does the device already have the settings hard coded. as in, did the carriers add these lines to some devices to level the field between the power users and the casual user.
need at least class 14 hsdpa to access tmo hspa+ 21.1 mbps
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-Speed_Downlink_Packet_Access
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-Speed_Uplink_Packet_Access

[URL=http://www.speedtest.net]
[/URL]Just Google hsdpa, hsupa, hsxpa
You need to choose the appropriate category for your local network.
I forget which is which but the category number is representative of the download/upload speeds you are capable of while on edge, 3g, beyond 3g, hsdpa.
For me, T-Mobile in Madison, Alabama,
GPRS= category 32
Hsdpa= category 14 (this doubled my speed on mobile speedtest.com!)
Hsupa= category 7
Hsxpa= category 2
I always add these to my build.prop and yes its because when I first saw them in one of Paul's desire roms, I googled each of them and tested and I can definitely tell the difference.
Good luck
Want free 2gb dropbox?
Use this link. https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTczOTM2MTY5
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Daddyroot said:
Just Google hsdpa, hsupa, hsxpa
You need to choose the appropriate category for your local network.
I forget which is which but the category number is representative of the download/upload speeds you are capable of while on edge, 3g, beyond 3g, hsdpa.
For me, T-Mobile in Madison, Alabama,
GPRS= category 32
Hsdpa= category 8
Hsupa= category 7
Hsxpa= category 2
I always add these to my build.prop and yes its because when I first saw them in one of Paul's desire roms, I googled each of them and tested and I can definitely tell the difference.
Good luck
Want free 2gb dropbox?
Use this link. https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTczOTM2MTY5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
definitely got faster UL and DL speeds with the text I bolded

Interesting... not sure itll be a good idea or even make a difference but Ill give this a try and report back my findings... If I may add though, an easier way to edit would be through root explorer app from market.

damentz said:
Are you sure all those options are still relevant? My froyo image has none of these and performs well. I can get higher throughput by adding
Code:
ro.ril.hsdpa=8
ro.ril.gprsclass=32
But the rest are largely undocumented and should remain at default unless someone can prove what they do.
The biggest issue is the radio. With Froyo, my 3g disconnection issues are GONE, so now we can focus on latency and throughput.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I added those 2 lines and 3G signal seems to be better when indoors. Especially in my room where the coverage is bad.

Update based on speedtest.net:
NOTE: Tested each tweak 5x and took note of it, phone stayed on the same exact place the whole time.
3g
- No significant change in speed between stock FroYo build.prop/ril=1/ril=2.
Edge
- Gprs =12 gave me slower DL and UL speed.
- Gprs = category 32 showed slight increase in DL speed but noticeably slower UL speed.
I'm sticking with the stock FroYo build.prop, it works perfectly fine.

Testing update: Weird results
Ok, did some testing. Changing hsxpa from 2=>1 did help it stay on 3G and reduced the switching from 3g to Edge a little. I had hsupa=6 and was getting download speeds of around .04-.09 mbps with upload speeds of 1.72 mbps on multiple runs?????? really weird, almost like it kill the dl and supercharged the ul.
The link below shows that the T-mobile N1 is hardware configured for
gprsclass=10
hsupa=6
hsdpa=6/7
hsxpa=1 or 2
http://my.opera.com/fordcom2002/blog/2010/01/13/google-nexus-one
These are the only settings I played with and didn't do every combination as there are a bunch. Seems it didn't make a big difference no matter what I set them to. Also, there is the possibility that these settings are conflicting with built in Froyo settings somewhere else, although it would take someone much more knowledgeable than this rookie to find them, lol.

mtw4991 said:
Ok, did some testing. Changing hsxpa from 2=>1 did help it stay on 3G and reduced the switching from 3g to Edge a little. I had hsupa=6 and was getting download speeds of around .04-.09 mbps with upload speeds of 1.72 mbps on multiple runs?????? really weird, almost like it kill the dl and supercharged the ul.
The link below shows that the T-mobile N1 is hardware configured for
gprsclass=10
hsupa=6
hsdpa=6/7
hsxpa=1 or 2
http://my.opera.com/fordcom2002/blog/2010/01/13/google-nexus-one
These are the only settings I played with and didn't do every combination as there are a bunch. Seems it didn't make a big difference no matter what I set them to. Also, there is the possibility that these settings are conflicting with built in Froyo settings somewhere else, although it would take someone much more knowledgeable than this rookie to find them, lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
did you just do this today?
it might be a TMobile glitch or speedtest app. I'm on a non froyo radio and was checking my speeds today and I was getting a 0.00 DL with a 1.4 UL
WTH?
but i know its DL'ing fine because i have no problem with the browser or youtube

Its possible that it could be a glitch. Check out my DL speeds. One is from an LA server and another from a Chicago server. Im located in LA.

serialtoon said:
Its possible that it could be a glitch. Check out my DL speeds. One is from an LA server and another from a Chicago server. Im located in LA.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Damn, I hope not as I spent some time changing/rebooting/changing/rebooting etc.

ro.ril.hsxpa=0 is UMTS
ro.ril.hsxpa=1 is HSDPA only
ro.ril.hsxpa=2 is HSDPA,HSUPA this is also network dependent. if your network isn't configured for this then your better off with option 2

mtw4991 said:
Originally Posted by stampere
you can edit the build.prop by
adb pull /system/build.prop c:\where\you\want\to\put\it\
open with wordpad and add the following lines
ro.ril.hsxpa=2
ro.ril.gprsclass=12
ro.ril.hep=1
ro.ril.enable.dtm=1
ro.ril.hsdpa.category=8
ro.ril.enable.a53=1
ro.ril.enable.3g.prefix=1
ro.ril.htcmaskw1.bitmask=4294967295
ro.ril.htcmaskw1=14449
ro.ril.hsupa.category=5
save the file
adb remount
adb push c:\where\you\want\to\put\it\build.prop /system/
reboot so that the settings take effect
________________________________________________________________
Stampere suggested this over in Paul's thread with no replys. The hxspa and gprsclass are not included in the Froyo build.prop anywhere I can see. They were included in CM 5.0.6.
Has anyone added these to Froyo and do they help or are they unnecessary and will conflict with the new Froyo 4.0.6 radio build?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
they don't conflict with the radio. the additional settings help with keeping the speeds consistent for streaming while tethered to the phone.

froyo build prop

stampere said:
froyo build prop
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks man, I'll do some more testing tomorrow. Don't need tethering with wifi hotspot now

Related

slow data speeds with new official Sprint rom.

I'm torn on what to do now. Initially I did the Sprint upgrade to the new rom and then flashed DCD 3.0 kitchen. was having lots of stability issues and slow data speeds(half of what I had with 3.27 radio). To isolate the problem I went back to the new stock Sprint rom. More stable now but slow data speeds on average again of half what I had before. Before with 1 bar I got 700k ish down now I get about 350. Anybody been able to solve this? faster gps lock is nice(suspect it's now using cell tower in combination more efficiently since I get even initial lock deep inside buildings) but don't think that will offset slower data speeds. Think it is same PRL too. 60711 I think. thanks for any help on this.
shadowreader said:
I'm torn on what to do now. Initially I did the Sprint upgrade to the new rom and then flashed DCD 3.0 kitchen. was having lots of stability issues and slow data speeds(half of what I had with 3.27 radio). To isolate the problem I went back to the new stock Sprint rom. More stable now but slow data speeds on average again of half what I had before. Before with 1 bar I got 700k ish down now I get about 350. Anybody been able to solve this? faster gps lock is nice(suspect it's now using cell tower in combination more efficiently since I get even initial lock deep inside buildings) but don't think that will offset slower data speeds. Think it is same PRL too. 60711 I think. thanks for any help on this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you turn on rev A.? I think sprint forgot that one little detail. I know some...myself included...had to do it manually.
how did you do it manually? I have my msl and everything just don't know where that setting is. thx.
I JUST read another thread over at pdaphone home that said on PPCGeeks they recommend that you leave the rev A setting as "Disable"...since its supposed to already be on. People have reported big jumps in speed when it is set to Disable.
To check: ##778# > if you dont have your MSL then just view it > select data parameters...I think.
tried it both enabled and disabled after soft reset. not much difference. still about half of what I used to get. may go back to 2.3.2 and 3.27 radio as I didn't have many problems with that other than slow gps lock. Would be great to have best of both worlds though
The one thing that helped me most was changing my DNS to OpenDNS.
Also; Speedtest sites seem to be TOO FAST for the browser to handle the data, so to do a reliable test try tethering the phone or use wmwifirouter. In my case my phone usually says it's getting around 350, but when I tether it actually turns out to be between 1000 and 1800.
FWIW; I use the dsl reports speed test to check the speed.
You could of course also make yourself a nice 10Mb file and test the speed manually.
Changing the Rev.A setting does NOT make a difference, if anything it makes it slower. Leave it as it is.
I am on Sprint. I am using wmwifirouter v.91 and using speakeasy's speedtest which consistently used to give me 800-2000K(sometimes over 2meg), With new radio struggling to reach 500K. By opendns do you mean 4.2.2.2? haven't tried that. suspect it would make a difference for latency/lookup speed but not so much for data throughput right?
To compare, we should all use the same test and browser. So use PIE for real world results (Opera uses a proxy) and I've found the www.mobilespeedtest.com has a better test than DSLReports.
Anybody have an even better alternative besides tethering?
shadowreader said:
I am on Sprint. I am using wmwifirouter v.91 and using speakeasy's speedtest which consistently used to give me 800-2000K(sometimes over 2meg), With new radio struggling to reach 500K. By opendns do you mean 4.2.2.2? haven't tried that. suspect it would make a difference for latency/lookup speed but not so much for data throughput right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
4.2.2.2 is a Verizon DNS server. OpenDNS is different. See opendns.com
Geckotek said:
To compare, we should all use the same test and browser. So use PIE for real world results (Opera uses a proxy) and I've found the www.mobilespeedtest.com has a better test than DSLReports.
Anybody have an even better alternative besides tethering?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have to disagree about the accuracy of each site... I have a full T1 at my disposal, and mobilespeedtest.com churned out the following:
Your current bandwidth reading is:
645.00kbps
www.dslreports.com/mspeed, however, returned:
1358 kbit/sec
I would go with dslreports. ymmv
Foetus said:
I have to disagree about the accuracy of each site... I have a full T1 at my disposal, and mobilespeedtest.com churned out the following:
Your current bandwidth reading is:
645.00kbps
www.dslreports.com/mspeed, however, returned:
1358 kbit/sec
I would go with dslreports. ymmv
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
DSL reports only tests 1 file size at a time and the smaller files always fail. We need to find a better option.
Edit: I've got a 6MB connection, DSL reports first said it was 1.9MB but then failed on 3 subsequent tries (too fast).
Mobilespeedtest gave me 277.40kbps first try 749.30kbps second.
So you're right.
Geckotek said:
DSL reports only tests 1 file size at a time and the smaller files always fail. We need to find a better option.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Personally, I tether my laptop to my phone and use www.speedtest.net
Foetus said:
Personally, I tether my laptop to my phone and use www.speedtest.net
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To many factors added into that mix to affect the test. I want a speedtest directly from the phone.
Foetus said:
I have to disagree about the accuracy of each site... I have a full T1 at my disposal, and mobilespeedtest.com churned out the following:
Your current bandwidth reading is:
645.00kbps
www.dslreports.com/mspeed, however, returned:
1358 kbit/sec
I would go with dslreports. ymmv
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I second that.
I tried mobilespeedtest.com yesterday while connected to a 6meg line...speed was rediculously low didnt break 500k. Tried speakeasy.net...I got 5.9 meg.
Just got 225kbps on dslreports 1meg file and 559kbps on mobilespeedtest with 3.35 radio and stock new Sprint rom on sprint network in rev A area 2 bars(not that great of signal but used to get double this speed at same location with 3.27 Radio)

Radio 3.35 Speed Poll

What are your experiences with the new Radio?
For consistency, please use the following test method.
While tethering your phone to your PC, use the speedtest located here: www.speedtest.net
Please post a graphic of your results as Maccaberry has below.
Please only post if you are in a Rev A area.
Note about testing speed...
Just to make it clear, you cannot test the speed of the broadband connection accurately using the phone and Pocket IE. It will not return the correct results!
The reason for this is that the processor needs to perform double-duty in order to load a page in Pocket IE; this means it processes the incoming data and also has to render the page. While the page is rendering, the data has to wait, and vice-versa.
The correct way to accurately test the speed of the data connection is by tethering the phone to your computer and then perform a speed test, through someone like speedtest.net or something like that. This is because the phone only collects the incoming data and then ports it to the USB for your computer to render in the browser.
My results confirm this:
Download Speed using the new ROM:
Pocket IE: ~950Kbps
Tethered: 1550Kbps
The difference is due to the processor not being able to stream all of the data at the maximum speed AND render the page all at the same time.
Hope this helps!
Geckotek,
I agree that the only way to accurately test is via tethered pc. PIE has never given anything like a real number for me.
www.speedtest.net seems to be the best and the one that most posters use as their reference.
Now if you could amend your instructions to use this method we would be onto something.
EDIT: with old radio and rom I get 1400 k DOWN and 120K UP as a point of reference. EV-DO Rev0
From the VZW network side
sitting at the console, from 3.27 to 3.55.04 RNC says session is REV-A for both, BER is better for new resulting in more reliable session, speed is a little better due to the BER (a timer was tweaked in the leaked radio) S/N ratio a tad better with older ROM but if you are in a good signal area then youe EVDO stays up better because the noise ref figure for fallback is set higher, and EVDO speed drops off faster with lower signal, new radio is wayyyyyyyyy better trust me as I see it's impact on the system.
I get about 440Kbps d/l and 104Kbps u/l tehered to my laptop. Seems strange that I can't get better numbers than that with 5 bars sitting in the center of Houston, TX. Certainly we have Rev. A here...
Very good point about the processor guys. I'll make the changes.
I like www.speakeasy.net/speedtest. For my posted results (which are > 1Mbps download, >300kbps upload), I used WMWiFiRouter to tether to my laptop and ran the test out of Firefox 3.0b4 running on said laptop. I believe this should be valid.
Before I changed the ##778# setting for Rev. A to enabled:
After I changed Rev. A to enabled:
Do you see something wrong with this picture? I don't think that setting does what some think it does.
whatsit said:
Before I changed the ##778# setting for Rev. A to enabled:
After I changed Rev. A to enabled:
Do you see something wrong with this picture? I don't think that setting does what some think it does.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, that's been discussed. The entry is to "Disable" Rev A. So "Enabling" the entry would in theory "Disable" Rev A. So the general concensus is to leave it alone.
Dealing with MS registry entries you find this type of logic a lot.
Speed Map
I'm sure most people know about this, but I'll put it here for posterity's sake.
EVDO Maps
Latest version of flash 7 required
OK - slightly off topic - sorry - but when I go to speedtest.net it syas I need at least flash player 7.0 or higher. I installed the flash player bundle and thought that would do it. no dice - anyone have an idea what I'm missing?
Flashplayer on your laptop.
j-squared said:
OK - slightly off topic - sorry - but when I go to speedtest.net it syas I need at least flash player 7.0 or higher. I installed the flash player bundle and thought that would do it. no dice - anyone have an idea what I'm missing?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are not off topic. In my reference to www.speedtest.net I specifically referred to tethering to the laptop because of the issues with running speed tests on the ppc itself.
Yet another reason that they should change the name from PIE to POS.
While using wmwifirouter
used two different sites
Last Result:
Download Speed: 2235 kbps (279.4 KB/sec transfer rate)
Upload Speed: 618 kbps (77.3 KB/sec transfer rate)

			
				
There is no point in doing this at all. Would you do a speed test on a WiFi access point when you have no idea what other people using the same access point are doing? That's exactly what you're doing with EVDO. You could be sharing bandwidth with 50 other people.
VZW here in houston area
Here is my test I did this morning...
Speakeasy.net/speedtest
2324kbps Down
316kbps Up

			
				
Sprint PCS Houston
Rev. A enabled ("Disable" shown in epst)
Rev. A disabled ("Enable" shown in epst)
I have a minimum of 4 bars where I am, jumping to 6 at periods. Any clue why I can't break the 500kbps barrier?

3g/4g speed optimizer (Poll added)

I downloaded this free app and shockingly enough, I actually went from a 3mbps download average to a 6mbps average. I don't know how it works, but it simply just does. No this isn't spam.
Here are some tests that I did tonight with it.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Test it out for your self. Let us know your results.
I can honestly say that it does hurt your battery life...
I also noticed that this seems to work better when you have fast dormancy off. To disable fast dormancy...dial *#9900* and click on disable fast dormancy.
wow I can't believe this app really works!
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
whats the name of the app?
brentett said:
whats the name of the app?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry...it's the title of the thread.
Mine was actually a little bit slower after applying the tweak. went from 4200kbps to 4000kbps, but the ping time went from 220ms to 170ms.
only one test on my phone though, so can't come to any significant conclusions
I tried it at a friend's house and my speeds went from 1.27Mbps immediately down to 0.21Mbps and 0.81Mbps. I tried a few different settings, none got it back to 1.3Mbps, so I uninstalled the tweak and the app.
Just tried it at home right now and scored a 5.2Mbps down, 1.80 up which is just about the fastest speed I've ever had at my house. Usually I'm around 2-3Mbps, but never higher than 5Mbps. Just looked my result history and 4.8Mbps was my fastest here in town.
Ran the test again 5 minutes later and puled in a 5.6Mbps down, 2.35Mbps up! I have never seen speeds that high in both categories.
I'm going to try testing a few things tomorrow, but these are promising initial results.
sdmark said:
Mine was actually a little bit slower after applying the tweak. went from 4200kbps to 4000kbps, but the ping time went from 220ms to 170ms.
only one test on my phone though, so can't come to any significant conclusions
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interesting....did you turn it on to the fastest mode? Interesting result to say the least. It really has just about doubled my download speed.
Thread moved to Themes and Apps...
Just ran another test using root metrics and scored 7Mbps down. These numbers are ridiculous. Looking forward to more testing tomorrow.
I'm curious if these are build.prop tweaks. There is one way to find out... TO THE CLOUD. I mean time to backup my build.prop and do some comparisons. I am also wondering if this will break my v6.
The faster the speed, the moar battery drain.
Download tweak threw this into my build.prop:
Normal:
HTML:
ro.ril.hsxpa=1
ro.ril.gprsclass=10
ro.ril.hep=1
ro.ril.enable.dtm=1
ro.ril.hsdpa.category=10
ro.ril.hsupa.category=6
ro.ril.enable.a53=1
ro.ril.enable.3g.prefix=1
The rest of the tweaks just change 3 of them.
ro.ril.hsxpa=
ro.ril.hsdpa.category=
ro.ril.hsupa.category=
Upload just changes ro.ril.hsxpa=
Anyone else giving this a go? I'm still having great results.
Good catch cwc3. I'm checking mine and all the build.prob tweaks were gone when my speeds were really high, so I think it was a placebo effect for the most part.
Being the tinkerer that I am, I tried the tweak again last night and it dropped back down to under 2Mbps download. Still faster than before running the tweaks though.
This morning, I reinstalled and retried the "FAST" tweak. It went up around 3Mbps.
I uninstalled the tweaks and it's back around 2Mbps.
I'm going to stay without the app tweaks for now. I am just going to experiment with modifying build.prob and saving the changes.
dmm5157 said:
Good catch cwc3. I'm checking mine and all the build.prob tweaks were gone when my speeds were really high, so I think it was a placebo effect for the most part.
Being the tinkerer that I am, I tried the tweak again last night and it dropped back down to under 2Mbps download. Still faster than before running the tweaks though.
This morning, I reinstalled and retried the "FAST" tweak. It went up around 3Mbps.
I uninstalled the tweaks and it's back around 2Mbps.
I'm going to stay without the app tweaks for now. I am just going to experiment with modifying build.prob and saving the changes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I really wish that I knew what you are talking about. Are the changes that it makes a bad thing? I really don't think that it's a placebo effect. It really is much faster. I guess I need an explanation for me to understand.
The reason I say placebo effect is because in my case I uninstalled the tweaks (removed the added lines from my build.prop file), restarted the phone, uninstalled the app, and then ran the speed test when I got my extremely fast speed test results.
That is, of course, unless the app is modifying something else.
I'm going to do some more digging when I finish helping my friend move into her new apartment.
Tries this myself and overall my speed performance went up. Not double like some but almost a full 1 mbps. From about 1.5 to 2.5. On a hell raised Rom though. Some of you guys getting like 5 what Rom are you using? People doing this test maybe put what Rom your using along with the speed increase numbers.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
ROM : ICScrewed 2.0.1
Modem is : UCKH7 Modem
Fast Dormancy is disabled
Average Download Speed is now ranging from 3.5mbps Minimum to 6.5mbps Max which is much higher than normal.
I will test this later with different Modems too....
I have a highly tweaked build.prop file, so the app thought that tweaks were already applied. The fast profile only changed 2 values in the file to values I had previously tested and had no luck with.
When I initially did a speed test, my upload went up from 0.9 to 1.6, and my download from 0.5 to 3 (I live in an area with hardly any cell towers nearby...it's like they're banned in the neighborhood).
I then uninstalled the app without removing the tweaks or rebooting, and my speed dropped. I wonder what else the app does, and if it's manipulating anything while being installed. I mean, if this app only modifies the build.prop file, theoretically it should no longer be needed once tweaks are applied.
I think maybe the tweaks caught the at&t network off-guard which gives the initial speed boost, but then the network eventually catches on and puts us back in our place. Actually, some threads even suggest that having the setting too high might eventually cause the network too slow your down below factory speeds. Hmmm
SoCaliTrojan said:
I have a highly tweaked build.prop file, so the app thought that tweaks were already applied. The fast profile only changed 2 values in the file to values I had previously tested and had no luck with.
When I initially did a speed test, my upload went up from 0.9 to 1.6, and my download from 0.5 to 3 (I live in an area with hardly any cell towers nearby...it's like they're banned in the neighborhood).
I then uninstalled the app without removing the tweaks or rebooting, and my speed dropped. I wonder what else the app does, and if it's manipulating anything while being installed. I mean, if this app only modifies the build.prop file, theoretically it should no longer be needed once tweaks are applied.
I think maybe the tweaks caught the at&t network off-guard which gives the initial speed boost, but then the network eventually catches on and puts us back in our place. Actually, some threads even suggest that having the setting too high might eventually cause the network too slow your down below factory speeds. Hmmm
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did your signal level seem to go up as well with the Mod/app? Mine did. Needless to say, I'm a bit confused.
Iskor12 said:
ROM : ICScrewed 2.0.1
Modem is : UCKH7 Modem
Fast Dormancy is disabled
Average Download Speed is now ranging from 3.5mbps Minimum to 6.5mbps Max which is much higher than normal.
I will test this later with different Modems too....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I used to get around 5 to 6. Forgot to mention Im in hell raised hyperdroid. Kk6 modem with latest siyah. Now Im lucky to get 2. With this app Im getting more consistent 2.3 to 2.8. Upload went down just slightly but that's fine cause id rather have faster download. Im in a decent size city too.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
Interesting app.. Inside home I barerly get 300kbps. With 1 signal bar, and with this app is at 2 bars, sometimes 3 and speed is around 1700kbps.

Wifi Firmwares and setting of Froyo & GB

Since some users are reporting about reduced wifi reception after updating to GB roms, I decided to extract wifi related files from a Froyo rom and GB rom and see what differences are there.
There are a number of wifi related files live under /system/etc/wifi and I have extracted them from a Froyo Rom (zske2) and GB Rom (xxkpf) and put them in this zip file don't flash this!
If you unzip it, you will find 2 sets of wifi settings and firmware. What I notice is that the binary firmwares are definitely different and there are various changes in the settings as well.
The first thing that caught my eye is the pa0maxpwr parameter in nvram_mfg.txt . From the name, it seems to mean maximum power. You can see that the value was 78 in Froyo. In GB, the engineers were trying values 74, commented it out and then settled for 72.
I tried setting it back to 78, seems to get a bit better (around 10db increase) if I connect from another room.
For those who are interested in this, please report back whether certain changes in these setting files will give you better result. Not necessary the one I mentioned. However, please use some objective measure e.g. Wifi Analyzer on the Market.
To edit these files, you can copy them out using root file explorer, edit them and put it back. I think you need a reboot to activate the change.
Be nice to compare compass/orientation files to see why GB compass doesn't seem to work at all... Maybe the wifi signal is interfering, and they didn't turn it down low enough
Great you starting to make some progress. How is the signal compare to your laptop at same position with this little tweak? Looking forward to your further explore!
Sent from my YP-G70 using xda premium
Hmm, tried editing on a U.S version YP-G1, makes no noticeable difference in connection strength (using wifi analyser). I'm about 35 ft away from the router.
I just tried this on my yp-g70 International version. It seems to have actually lowered my reception a few db. I set it back to 72 and rebooted and it brought it up a couple db. I'm connecting to wifi about a block away so that may have something to do with the few db change. I don't think it really made a difference though.
My experience is similar to previous 2 posts. Playing with the maxpwr setting doesn't seem to improve much.
In fact, I even apply the entire set of Froyo firmware and settings to a GB rom. It doesn't seem to get any better.
I think to actually track down wifi reception problem. We need more information from those who experience the problem. e.g. ROM version and objective testing of the different ROM version at the same spot. May be even router brand & version as well.
WT Ho said:
My experience is similar to previous 2 posts. Playing with the maxpwr setting doesn't seem to improve much.
In fact, I even apply the entire set of Froyo firmware and settings to a GB rom. It doesn't seem to get any better.
I think to actually track down wifi reception problem. We need more information from those who experience the problem. e.g. ROM version and objective testing of the different ROM version at the same spot. May be even router brand & version as well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am using XEKP2 stock rom (Russian one) and Dlink G604T router with latest NZ fw. Some people on forum using XXKPH also suffered a bit. This seems to be a general problem for GB (independent of version). If some people got connection/disconnection from router, then it could be router dependent. Anybody can easily experience it simply revert to Froyo stock. I would say you may get 10~20db signal increase (though wifi reception in GB may still be in acceptable range). Hope to get more people report their wifi reception on comparison of GB and Froyo under same condition.
Sent from my YP-G70 using xda premium
Some positive result from anil_kilic
This is some test results sent to me by anil_kilic. It is interesting that at pa0maxpwr=72, his connection is very bad and a boost in pa0maxpwr to 78 gives him a 8-10db gain in signal strength.
It is only one data point but it might mean that this kind of tweak will benefit very bad connection but not on moderate or good connections. Hopefully, we will see some more test cases.
anil_kilic said:
Before (pa0maxpwr=72) :
*Not static signal
*Disconnect / cant get signal.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
After (pa0maxpwr=78) :
*Static signal
*I got 8-10 db
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WT Ho said:
Since some users are reporting about reduced wifi reception after updating to GB roms, I decided to extract wifi related files from a Froyo rom and GB rom and see what differences are there.
There are a number of wifi related files live under /system/etc/wifi and I have extracted them from a Froyo Rom (zske2) and GB Rom (xxkpf) and put them in this zip file don't flash this!
If you unzip it, you will find 2 sets of wifi settings and firmware. What I notice is that the binary firmwares are definitely different and there are various changes in the settings as well.
The first thing that caught my eye is the pa0maxpwr parameter in nvram_mfg.txt . From the name, it seems to mean maximum power. You can see that the value was 78 in Froyo. In GB, the engineers were trying values 74, commented it out and then settled for 72.
I tried setting it back to 78, seems to get a bit better (around 10db increase) if I connect from another room.
For those who are interested in this, please report back whether certain changes in these setting files will give you better result. Not necessary the one I mentioned. However, please use some objective measure e.g. Wifi Analyzer on the Market.
To edit these files, you can copy them out using root file explorer, edit them and put it back. I think you need a reboot to activate the change.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I`ve did exactly what you said on a SGS+ (GT-i9001) and raise that value from 72 to 78 and then extreme a bit till 90 I will post screenshots in a few mins ... no changes tho ...
Edit: well it seems I saved my screenshots as csv instead of pictures but anyway I gained not so much dB signal but more stability and ability to use wifi even on poor signal and that really help.
KPL new FW
very interesting.
SG have issued a KPL firmware with WIFI "improvments" they say.
ThisFW is for korean YP-GB70 ONLY but the wifi setting can be investigated as well.
Just my say, it is working well on my device and for me better than KPF was, so can be subjective.
Link:
http://ts.daumcdn.net/custom/blog/8...me.html?http://supportgp.tistory.com/notice/2
Thanks our Korean friends
lolo9393 said:
very interesting.
SG have issued a KPL firmware with WIFI "improvments" they say.
ThisFW is for korean YP-GB70 ONLY but the wifi setting can be investigated as well.
Just my say, it is working well on my device and for me better than KPF was, so can be subjective.
Link:
http://ts.daumcdn.net/custom/blog/8...me.html?http://supportgp.tistory.com/notice/2
Thanks our Korean friends
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Last value pack it has improvements and very good tbh but...the main GB problem isn't the driver itself it's the loading of it. I could manage to make it work by reloading sometimes but that's frustrating to reload wifi module 4-5 times/day....
mobile sent

Verizon throttling and SQLite

Was browsing thru my SQLite editor today and saw something I hadn't noticed before, some values relating to throttling. As follows:
throttle polling sec. ---setting 600
throttle threshold in bytes----- setting 0
throttle value kbitsps------setting 300
throttle notification type------setting 2
I don't recall seeing this before, but in any case was wondering if someone with more knowledge about files would know if this has to do with
Verizons throttling my speeds and if it could be changed to prevent it.
I'm thinking the notification value of 2 could be changed to zero and no notification would be passed thru to them. But WTF do I know? I'm being throttled almost daily and at times brutally and this I DO KNOW. I have an unlimited and usually hit 4 to 5 GB/month. certainly not outrageous. IMHO.
I'm on GB if it makes a diff. Rooted of course.
TIA
cbreze said:
Was browsing thru my SQLite editor today and saw something I hadn't noticed before, some values relating to throttling. As follows:
throttle polling sec. ---setting 600
throttle threshold in bytes----- setting 0
throttle value kbitsps------setting 300
throttle notification type------setting 2
I don't recall seeing this before, but in any case was wondering if someone with more knowledge about files would know if this has to do with
Verizons throttling my speeds and if it could be changed to prevent it.
I'm thinking the notification value of 2 could be changed to zero and no notification would be passed thru to them. But WTF do I know? I'm being throttled almost daily and at times brutally and this I DO KNOW. I have an unlimited and usually hit 4 to 5 GB/month. certainly not outrageous. IMHO.
I'm on GB if it makes a diff. Rooted of course.
TIA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where exactly have you found it?
cbreze said:
Was browsing thru my SQLite editor today and saw something I hadn't noticed before, some values relating to throttling. As follows:
throttle polling sec. ---setting 600
throttle threshold in bytes----- setting 0
throttle value kbitsps------setting 300
throttle notification type------setting 2
I don't recall seeing this before, but in any case was wondering if someone with more knowledge about files would know if this has to do with
Verizons throttling my speeds and if it could be changed to prevent it.
I'm thinking the notification value of 2 could be changed to zero and no notification would be passed thru to them. But WTF do I know? I'm being throttled almost daily and at times brutally and this I DO KNOW. I have an unlimited and usually hit 4 to 5 GB/month. certainly not outrageous. IMHO.
I'm on GB if it makes a diff. Rooted of course.
TIA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How do you know you're being throttled and it's not just a random lowered speed? I've speedtested twice in a row and sometimes my speed has gone from 20/10 to 4/1 or less. It could be a random slowing down.
No real hard evidence of throttling I suppose, but speeds are really terrible sometimes and were really good prior to this whole throttling gig being announced. So a presumption on my part. In any case I've made a tweak to the throttling notification file just for kicks, see if I notice any diff.
In SQLite, go to 3rd settings icon and look in secure. It also shows a reset factor of 18 days.
What day does your billing cycle starts? My showing reset 20 - that day my billing cycle starts
tvlovers said:
What day does your billing cycle starts? My showing reset 20 - that day my billing cycle starts
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My billing cycle starts on the 26th. My reset of 18 days must be something different then. I did change the one setting from 2 to 1 and then zero and I seem to be having better speeds or at
LEast more consistent. The 300 kbs setting has me wondering if that is some sort of threshold because when I feel throttling kick in I would never go over that number and usually it was way less. Maybe I'll change it to 1000 and see what happens LOL!
TBH , I think a lot of us are being throttled and just blaming an over crowed network, which kind of makes sense, but I used to be able to stream movies on Hulu with no buffering and in 3G speed with no problem. Then when they announced throttling would be happening to the so-called "heavy" users of anything over 2GB(what a joke) I then noticed a drop in speeds as soon as I hit 2GB and it's been that way ever since.
Using SQLite to hack the hotspot was a joy to have that over Verizon, but if this helps my speeds then all the nicer. It does seem to be helping, so I'm going to keep tweaking and see.
I wish someone who knew for sure one way or the other would chime in, but then don't want my bubble burst anyway
Be even better when LTE comes to the hood.
cbreze said:
Was browsing thru my SQLite editor today and saw something I hadn't noticed before, some values relating to throttling. As follows:
throttle polling sec. ---setting 600
throttle threshold in bytes----- setting 0
throttle value kbitsps------setting 300
throttle notification type------setting 2
I don't recall seeing this before, but in any case was wondering if someone with more knowledge about files would know if this has to do with
Verizons throttling my speeds and if it could be changed to prevent it.
I'm thinking the notification value of 2 could be changed to zero and no notification would be passed thru to them. But WTF do I know? I'm being throttled almost daily and at times brutally and this I DO KNOW. I have an unlimited and usually hit 4 to 5 GB/month. certainly not outrageous. IMHO.
I'm on GB if it makes a diff. Rooted of course.
TIA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where are these settings? Please.
From my ICED down MAXX!
countryfolk07 said:
Where are these settings? Please.
From my ICED down MAXX!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Using SQLite go to settings storage , the one below the other settings storage, then click and find secure. It's in there, hard to miss.
I tried some different tweaks and have settled on changing the notification type from 2 to 0.
I also have the throttle value in kbps changed from 300 to 200. This seems to be working well for me as of today. Let me know how it goes.
My speed seems better over all, but even better is the data drops on 3G seem much less. I don't have LTE here.
Just found that my settings storage secure only has one option, throttle reset days! Its set at 13. I don't have the OTA, I'm on the fast boot version. There must be some slight differences. Even the hotspots hack is on a different line. What the heck!
From my ICED down MAXX!
countryfolk07 said:
Just found that my settings storage secure only has one option, throttle reset days! Its set at 13. I don't have the OTA, I'm on the fast boot version. There must be some slight differences. Even the hotspots hack is on a different line. What the heck!
From my ICED down MAXX!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your on ICS then, that didn't even occur to me. I'm on GB. Must be a diff setup.
EDIT: I wonder why the reset days are diff? Mines 18.
cbreze said:
Your on ICS then, that didn't even occur to me. I'm on GB. Must be a diff setup.
EDIT: I wonder why the reset days are diff? Mines 18.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually my wife is on ICS also, but she's on the OTA files. She's never fast booted. So fasboot files must be different than OTA. Not sure why, unless they're trying to "patch" the throttle "hack". Who knows.
From my ICED down MAXX!
hotleadsingerguy said:
How do you know you're being throttled and it's not just a random lowered speed? I've speedtested twice in a row and sometimes my speed has gone from 20/10 to 4/1 or less. It could be a random slowing down.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When i'm getting throttled down, i have to restart my phone to get back into high speed.
Have you guys experienced similar things?
Also once I fall down into 3G during tethering, i rarely go back up to 4G without resetting the radio
I have grandfather unlimited and i can't say i've been throttled.
16.5gb so far.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my DROID RAZR using xda premium
Those settings may apply to 3G only but not sure. I thought that 3G was actually throttled at some point but 4G was not. What that point is I have no idea.
Of course this is all speculation at this point.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2

Categories

Resources